methane presentation

28
BOILERS AND BOILERS AND COMBUSTION CONTROL COMBUSTION CONTROL Presented By: Presented By: Ryan Thompson, P.E. Ryan Thompson, P.E. P roj e ct Ma n a g e r P roj e ct Ma n a g e r D e pa r tm e nt of Utilities a nd Ene r gy Ma na ge m e nt D e pa r tm e nt of Utilitie s a nd Ene r gy Ma na ge m e nt

Upload: vinod-mahajan

Post on 03-Apr-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 1/28

BOILERS ANDBOILERS AND

COMBUSTION CONTROLCOMBUSTION CONTROL

Presented By:Presented By:

Ryan Thompson, P.E.Ryan Thompson, P.E.

Project ManagerProject ManagerDepartment of Utilities and Energy ManagementDepartment of Utilities and Energy Management

Page 2: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 2/28

University of Texas at AustinUniversity of Texas at Austin¾Utility Plant supports

– 17 million square feet of facilities– 51,000 students

– 25,000 faculty and staff 

¾Providing– 61 MW of power 

– 30,000 Tons of chilled water – 200,000 lbs per hour steam

Page 3: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 3/28

BackgroundBackground

¾Voluntary Emissions ReductionPermit (VERP) submitted in Augustof 2003

¾Proposed reducing NOx byapproximately 80%

¾Accepted by the TCEQ in December of 2003

¾Completion March 1, 2007

Page 4: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 4/28

BackgroundBackground

¾Issued Request for Qualifications(RFQ) in May of 2004

¾Over 20 firms responded to RFQ

¾Four firms, including Benz Air Engineering, interviewed

Page 5: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 5/28

RFQ SubmittalsRFQ Submittals

Technology Drawbacks

SCR Expensive, requires ammonia or other chemical, stackmodification

Low NOxBurners

Expensive, requires extensiveboiler modification resulting in

unknown characteristics.

Over-fired Air Requires boiler modification,

increases parasitic load

Page 6: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 6/28

RFQ Submittals Cont.RFQ Submittals Cont.

Technology Drawbacks

Water / SteamInjection

Water costs, reduced boiler capacity.

Induced DraftFGR

Could not guarantee reductionswithout water injection

Compu-NOx ® 

Unanimous Selection

Page 7: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 7/28

CompuCompu--NOxNOx ®  ® 

¾Lowest first cost by more than 50%

¾Guaranteed lowest NOx emissionsrate

¾Improve turndown from 10:1 to 20:1

¾Lowest operating cost (boiler operating costs reduced)

¾Shortest down-time requirements

Page 8: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 8/28

Problem DescriptionProblem Description

¾NOx emission mandates.

¾Higher Fuel Costs

¾Burner Replacement = Uncertainty

– Unstable operation

– Inefficient

Page 9: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 9/28

SolutionSolution

Innovative boiler control system thatmatches combustion air, fuel, and

flue gas recirculation to provide:•NOx reduction to below mandated

levels throughout boiler operatingrange

•Higher Efficiency for ROI

Page 10: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 10/28

Combustion and ThermalCombustion and Thermal NOxNOx

¾CH4 + 2O2 CO2 + 2H2O + Heat

¾O2 + N2 N- + O- +NO-

Heat

Page 11: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 11/28

Natural Gas ConstituentsNatural Gas Constituents

¾ Component Typical Analysis(mole %)¾ Methane 94.9

¾ Ethane 2.5¾ Propane 0.2¾ iso – Butane 0.03¾ normal – Butane 0.03¾ iso – Pentane 0.01¾ normal – Pentane 0.01¾ Hexanes plus 0.01

¾ Nitrogen 1.6¾ Carbon Dioxide 0.7¾ Oxygen 0.02

¾ Hydrogen trace

http://www.uniongas.com/aboutus/aboutng/composition.asp

Page 12: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 12/28

NOx versus Excess OxygenNOx versus Excess OxygenNOx versus Excess Stack O2

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Excess O2

   N   O  x  c  o  r  r  e  c   t  e   d   t  o   3   %  o   2

Page 13: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 13/28

¾Fixed speed fan controlled by dampers

¾ Inaccurate control means high excess air delivered to combustion section of boiler 

(typically 14-16%).¾High temperatures and abundant oxygenradicals in flame promote NOx formation.

¾Flame instabilities at lower loads due toinability to control air flow from fixedspeed fans.

Standard Boiler OperationStandard Boiler Operation

Page 14: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 14/28

¾Near Stoichiometric Combustion.

¾Little FGR needed for high NOxreduction.

¾Air, fuel, and flue gas recirculationflows are metered throughout the

boiler’s operating range – from hotstandby to full load conditions.

CompuCompu--NOxNOx DesignDesign

Page 15: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 15/28

Combustion EquationCombustion Equation

StoichiometricCH4 + 2(O2) +7.52(N2) = CO2 + 2(H2O) +7.52(N2)

15% Excess O2

CH4 + 2.3(O2) +8.648(N2) = CO2 + 2(H2O) +8.648(N2) + 0.3(O2)

Page 16: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 16/28

CompuCompu--NOxNOx AdvantagesAdvantages

¾Utilizes existing boiler burners and fans¾Can be integrated into existing plant

operating networks

¾>100 to one boiler turn-down.

¾VFD Combined with Proper PLC Control =

Control of Air and Flue gas¾Cubic Reduction of Horsepower 

– 600hp fan will consume 75hp at 50% load---

0.6hp at 10% load!

Page 17: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 17/28

Positive slope characteristic at loadsless than 50%. Impossible to control!

Stable Operating Point throughout theload. Repeatable Control throughout

the load with Unlimited Turndown.

Cubic Reduction in Power

Damper Control VFD Control

Page 18: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 18/28

Page 19: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 19/28

Boiler #3Boiler #3 – – University of TexasUniversity of Texas

¾ 1950’s vintage Babcock & Wilcox Boiler ¾ 500F Combustion Air Temperature.

– Competing proposals required eliminating air preheat.¾ 4 ring burners (original) and rated for 150,000

lbm/hr 

¾ Compu-NOx installed 2005.¾ NOx reduced from 220ppm to 18ppm - Natural

Gas

¾ NOx reduced from 320ppm to 28ppm - #2 Oil¾ Boiler efficiency increased from 76% to 85%¾ Ability to bank boiler results in $6000.00/day

savings

¾ Simple payback in 2.2 months

Page 20: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 20/28

Unexpected ResultsUnexpected Results

¾After control modifications boilerswere much more responsive

¾Although 20 to 1 turndown possible,water treatment issues surfaced

¾Discovered it was possible to “Bank”either boiler 

¾This allowed a new operating

condition

Page 21: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 21/28

Original PlanOriginal Plan

Page 22: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 22/28

New PlanNew Plan

Page 23: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 23/28

Actual ResultsActual Results

¾Savings from reduction in HP slightly

higher ~$110,000 per year ¾Savings from “Banking” boiler 

– Over $2 million annually

Page 24: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 24/28

Project SummaryProject Summary¾Both boilers surpassed the VERP

required reductions both on naturalgas and fuel oil

– Boiler 3 - 184 ppm to 22.2 ppm– Boiler 7 – 296 ppm to 27.5 ppm

¾Efficiency improvements of between5 and 10% depending on load

¾Turndown better than 20 to 1

Page 25: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 25/28

Project Summary (Cont.)Project Summary (Cont.)

¾Savings from reduction in HP

– ~$100,000 annually

¾Savings from increased boiler efficiency (lower excess air)

– ~$850,000 annually

¾Less than a 2 year payback

Page 26: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 26/28

ConclusionsConclusions

¾Both Emissions reduction andefficiency gains can be achievedthrough proper boiler control.

¾Existing equipment can be utilized to

achieve significant value to operatingplants.

Page 27: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 27/28

For More InformationFor More Information

¾Robert Benz

¾Benz Air Engineering Co. Inc.

¾4061 Silvestri St. Las Vegas, NV89119

¾[email protected]

Page 28: Methane Presentation

7/29/2019 Methane Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 28/28

Contact InformationContact Information

¾Ryan Thompson

¾University of Texas at Austin

¾215 E. 24th Street, Austin, 78712

¾[email protected]