methane presentation
TRANSCRIPT
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 1/28
BOILERS ANDBOILERS AND
COMBUSTION CONTROLCOMBUSTION CONTROL
Presented By:Presented By:
Ryan Thompson, P.E.Ryan Thompson, P.E.
Project ManagerProject ManagerDepartment of Utilities and Energy ManagementDepartment of Utilities and Energy Management
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 2/28
University of Texas at AustinUniversity of Texas at Austin¾Utility Plant supports
– 17 million square feet of facilities– 51,000 students
– 25,000 faculty and staff
¾Providing– 61 MW of power
– 30,000 Tons of chilled water – 200,000 lbs per hour steam
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 3/28
BackgroundBackground
¾Voluntary Emissions ReductionPermit (VERP) submitted in Augustof 2003
¾Proposed reducing NOx byapproximately 80%
¾Accepted by the TCEQ in December of 2003
¾Completion March 1, 2007
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 4/28
BackgroundBackground
¾Issued Request for Qualifications(RFQ) in May of 2004
¾Over 20 firms responded to RFQ
¾Four firms, including Benz Air Engineering, interviewed
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 5/28
RFQ SubmittalsRFQ Submittals
Technology Drawbacks
SCR Expensive, requires ammonia or other chemical, stackmodification
Low NOxBurners
Expensive, requires extensiveboiler modification resulting in
unknown characteristics.
Over-fired Air Requires boiler modification,
increases parasitic load
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 6/28
RFQ Submittals Cont.RFQ Submittals Cont.
Technology Drawbacks
Water / SteamInjection
Water costs, reduced boiler capacity.
Induced DraftFGR
Could not guarantee reductionswithout water injection
Compu-NOx ®
Unanimous Selection
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 7/28
CompuCompu--NOxNOx ® ®
¾Lowest first cost by more than 50%
¾Guaranteed lowest NOx emissionsrate
¾Improve turndown from 10:1 to 20:1
¾Lowest operating cost (boiler operating costs reduced)
¾Shortest down-time requirements
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 8/28
Problem DescriptionProblem Description
¾NOx emission mandates.
¾Higher Fuel Costs
¾Burner Replacement = Uncertainty
– Unstable operation
– Inefficient
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 9/28
SolutionSolution
Innovative boiler control system thatmatches combustion air, fuel, and
flue gas recirculation to provide:•NOx reduction to below mandated
levels throughout boiler operatingrange
•Higher Efficiency for ROI
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 10/28
Combustion and ThermalCombustion and Thermal NOxNOx
¾CH4 + 2O2 CO2 + 2H2O + Heat
¾O2 + N2 N- + O- +NO-
Heat
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 11/28
Natural Gas ConstituentsNatural Gas Constituents
¾ Component Typical Analysis(mole %)¾ Methane 94.9
¾ Ethane 2.5¾ Propane 0.2¾ iso – Butane 0.03¾ normal – Butane 0.03¾ iso – Pentane 0.01¾ normal – Pentane 0.01¾ Hexanes plus 0.01
¾ Nitrogen 1.6¾ Carbon Dioxide 0.7¾ Oxygen 0.02
¾ Hydrogen trace
http://www.uniongas.com/aboutus/aboutng/composition.asp
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 12/28
NOx versus Excess OxygenNOx versus Excess OxygenNOx versus Excess Stack O2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Excess O2
N O x c o r r e c t e d t o 3 % o 2
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 13/28
¾Fixed speed fan controlled by dampers
¾ Inaccurate control means high excess air delivered to combustion section of boiler
(typically 14-16%).¾High temperatures and abundant oxygenradicals in flame promote NOx formation.
¾Flame instabilities at lower loads due toinability to control air flow from fixedspeed fans.
Standard Boiler OperationStandard Boiler Operation
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 14/28
¾Near Stoichiometric Combustion.
¾Little FGR needed for high NOxreduction.
¾Air, fuel, and flue gas recirculationflows are metered throughout the
boiler’s operating range – from hotstandby to full load conditions.
CompuCompu--NOxNOx DesignDesign
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 15/28
Combustion EquationCombustion Equation
StoichiometricCH4 + 2(O2) +7.52(N2) = CO2 + 2(H2O) +7.52(N2)
15% Excess O2
CH4 + 2.3(O2) +8.648(N2) = CO2 + 2(H2O) +8.648(N2) + 0.3(O2)
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 16/28
CompuCompu--NOxNOx AdvantagesAdvantages
¾Utilizes existing boiler burners and fans¾Can be integrated into existing plant
operating networks
¾>100 to one boiler turn-down.
¾VFD Combined with Proper PLC Control =
Control of Air and Flue gas¾Cubic Reduction of Horsepower
– 600hp fan will consume 75hp at 50% load---
0.6hp at 10% load!
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 17/28
Positive slope characteristic at loadsless than 50%. Impossible to control!
Stable Operating Point throughout theload. Repeatable Control throughout
the load with Unlimited Turndown.
Cubic Reduction in Power
Damper Control VFD Control
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 18/28
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 19/28
Boiler #3Boiler #3 – – University of TexasUniversity of Texas
¾ 1950’s vintage Babcock & Wilcox Boiler ¾ 500F Combustion Air Temperature.
– Competing proposals required eliminating air preheat.¾ 4 ring burners (original) and rated for 150,000
lbm/hr
¾ Compu-NOx installed 2005.¾ NOx reduced from 220ppm to 18ppm - Natural
Gas
¾ NOx reduced from 320ppm to 28ppm - #2 Oil¾ Boiler efficiency increased from 76% to 85%¾ Ability to bank boiler results in $6000.00/day
savings
¾ Simple payback in 2.2 months
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 20/28
Unexpected ResultsUnexpected Results
¾After control modifications boilerswere much more responsive
¾Although 20 to 1 turndown possible,water treatment issues surfaced
¾Discovered it was possible to “Bank”either boiler
¾This allowed a new operating
condition
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 21/28
Original PlanOriginal Plan
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 22/28
New PlanNew Plan
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 23/28
Actual ResultsActual Results
¾Savings from reduction in HP slightly
higher ~$110,000 per year ¾Savings from “Banking” boiler
– Over $2 million annually
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 24/28
Project SummaryProject Summary¾Both boilers surpassed the VERP
required reductions both on naturalgas and fuel oil
– Boiler 3 - 184 ppm to 22.2 ppm– Boiler 7 – 296 ppm to 27.5 ppm
¾Efficiency improvements of between5 and 10% depending on load
¾Turndown better than 20 to 1
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 25/28
Project Summary (Cont.)Project Summary (Cont.)
¾Savings from reduction in HP
– ~$100,000 annually
¾Savings from increased boiler efficiency (lower excess air)
– ~$850,000 annually
¾Less than a 2 year payback
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 26/28
ConclusionsConclusions
¾Both Emissions reduction andefficiency gains can be achievedthrough proper boiler control.
¾Existing equipment can be utilized to
achieve significant value to operatingplants.
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 27/28
For More InformationFor More Information
¾Robert Benz
¾Benz Air Engineering Co. Inc.
¾4061 Silvestri St. Las Vegas, NV89119
7/29/2019 Methane Presentation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-presentation 28/28
Contact InformationContact Information
¾Ryan Thompson
¾University of Texas at Austin
¾215 E. 24th Street, Austin, 78712