mergers and acquisition failures
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
In 2006, Left Parties and Opposition together Prevented Congress to Pass Banking ,Insurance and Pension fund reforms in Parliament.
![Page 3: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
As a result companies like AIG, Citi Group, Merrill lynch, Lehman Brothers, Bear Sterns, Bank of America, Wachovia, RBS and many others were restrained to acquire stakes in Indian banks and Insurance Companies.
![Page 4: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
If foreign banks had been allowed to take over 74 per cent interest in Indian banks, our banks would have collapsed. If pension funds had been privatized, crores of employees would have been ruined. Similarly, if the insurance cap had gone up to 49 per cent, the collapse of American Insurance Group (AIG) would have made Tata-AIG far more vulnerable.
![Page 5: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Bank Collapse
![Page 6: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Now, we will Analysis the various reasons why Mergers and Acquisition fails big time.
![Page 7: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
1. Bullish Stock Market.
Leads to Over Valuation.
![Page 8: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
High Valuation
![Page 9: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
On 30 January 2007, Tata Steel, part of India's Tata Group, purchased a 100% stake in the Corus Group at 608 pence per share in an all cash deal, cumulatively valued at (USD 12.04 Billion).
![Page 10: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Around the Same Period.
Hindalco acquired Canada based Novelis. The deal involved transaction of $5,982 million.
![Page 11: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Studies reveal that approximately 40% to 80% of mergers and acquisitions prove to be disappointing. The reason is that their value on the stock market deteriorates afterwards.
![Page 12: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
2. Difference in Working Culture.
One thing that can tear a merger apart is the attitude of "us versus them". This attitude is the reason
of failure for most of the mergers
![Page 13: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Quaker Oats
Snapple Beverage Co
![Page 14: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Cultural Difference
![Page 15: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
In the year 1994, Quaker Oats purchased Snapple Beverage Co. for a total cost of $1.7 billion but the Snapple business was sold off after a period of three years for a loss of $1.4 billion.
![Page 16: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The main reason of this failure was the conflict between the corporate cultures. Quaker had an extremely focused, mass-market working approach and on the other hand Snapple's style was eccentric, commercial and tilted towards its distributors.
![Page 17: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
aa
![Page 18: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
The merger of Daimler-Benz and Chrysler became a straight out clash between the business cultures of the two firms. The differentiation in corporate culture of the firms involved was the main reason for the non success of this alliance.
![Page 19: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
While the management style of Daimler-Benz’s was more of a formal and planned out sort, Chrysler’s management was more tilted towards a stress-free, unrestrictive style
As a result the company's shareholders had to bear the burden of the collision.
![Page 20: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
aa
![Page 21: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
aa
![Page 22: Mergers and Acquisition failures](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546ac9bdb4af9fbd508b47aa/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
aa