memorandum of understanding - nbccnbccindia.gov.in/nbccindia/public/pdf_data_pub/mou/... ·...
TRANSCRIPT
2 | P a g e
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN
NBCC AND MOUD FOR THE YEAR 2012-2013
PART- I
CORPORATE VISION AND OBJECTIVES
CORPORATE VISION
Our vision is to be a widely admired and preferred construction servicescompany
MISSION
To supply customers with practical secure innovative and cost-efficientconstruction products and services that meets their needs as well asproviding the necessary supporting infrastructure
To act in a socially responsible way to contribute to national wealthwhilst upholding our responsibility for the environment and promotingthe well-being of our customers employees shareholders and otherstakeholders
To achieve a premier position by developing and adopting bestpractices and state-of-the art technology in construction services andrelated activities for gaining a competitive advantage
To deliver value to projects through cost and planning optimization andeffective risk management
To become the first ranked company of the Government of India in thefield of Contract and Construction Services
3 | P a g e
OBJECTIVES
1 Implementing management practices that encourage valueadded innovative construction services delivery
2 Ensuring the long-term viability of the company throughprudent financial management and the provision of efficientand effective services
3 Managing industry organizational and contractualrelationships in an ethical fair and professional manner
4 Maintaining the flexibility of structure policies and systemnecessary to accomplish the corporate mission in the face ofchanging circumstances and needs
5 Conducting operations in a way that helps protect andpromote the natural environment
6 Building brand awareness
7 Maintaining Human resources management practices thatadvocate and advance the well-being of employees as wellas their personal and professional development
8 Adhering to all statutory requirements public policyregulations and guidelines
9 Continuing participation in the Government initiatives fordevelopment of remote areas
10 To achieve a more diversified revenue base
4 | P a g e
PART-II
AUTONOMY AND DELEGATION OF FINANCIAL POWERS
- NIL -
P A R T -I IIP e r fo rm a n c e E v alu a tio n C r ite r ia a n d T a r g e t s
N A T IO N A L B U IL D IN G S C O N S T R U C T IO N C O R P O R A T IO N L IM IT E DM O U As s e ss m en t F o rm at 2 01 2 - 20 1 3
6 | P a g e
7 | P a g e
Annexure-A
Template for HRM Performance Evaluation under Memorandum of UnderstandingSl
NoHRM - PERFORMANCE
INDICATORSMeasurement Unit Weig
htageTarget value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
A Competency amp Leadership DevelopmentA1 Compulsory1 actualization of Training
Plan amp Training Days peremployee per year
fulfilment ampDays per
employee peryear
5 027 day employee year -Excellent025 day employee year - Very Good020 day employee year - Good018 day employee year -Averagelt018 day employee year - Poor
Certificationby TrainingHead
2 Developing critical mass ofleaders through a system ofcareer planning ampdevelopment()
fulfilment ofplanned
leadershipdevelopmentprogrammes
5 020 day employee year -Excellent019 day employee year - Very Good018 day employee year - Good017 day employee year -Averagelt017 day employee year - Poor
Certificationby TrainingHead
3 Training budget as ofemployee cost
of employeescost
5 025 - Excellent020 - Very Good015 - Good010 - Averagelt010 -Poor
ExpensesSheet andBalanceSheet
4 Fulfilment of training planfor Multi-skilling skill Up-gradation of non-executives()
5 5 - Excellent4 - Very Good3 - Good2 - Averagelt2 - Poor
TrainingSheet
Total 20
8 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
A2 Optional (Out of below five one is to be taken in the MOU) - 5 Marks5 of executives covered in
360 degree feedback systemagainst plan
X
Not Opted
6 of Senior level executives(HoDs amp GMs and above)covered in Assessment ampDevelopment Centre
X
Not Opted
7 Training interventions in new advanced technology - fulfilment of training plan innew technology
X
Not Opted
8 Interventions towardsIndustry - Academia Interface()
YesNoDetails
5
YES BIMTECH has been engaged forsupport in MDP programme4 Nos of programme- Excellent3 Nos of Programme - Very Good2 Nos of Programme- Good1 No of Programme- Average0 No of Programme- Poor
Copy ofMOU
9 fulfillmentof Plan forcarrying out CompetencyMapping of employees
X
Not Opted
Total (A1+A2) 25
9 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
B Performance Management10 To ensure implementation of
Bell Curve Approach in PMSrating ()
Yes NO 4 Yes RatingSummaryReport
11 Linkage of DevelopmentalPlan of Executives withPerformance ManagementSystem()
Yes NO 3 Yes TrainingCalander
12 Implementation of PRP linkedto PMS()
Yes NODetails 3 Yes Certificationby HR Head
Total (B) 10C Recruitment Retention amp Talent Management13 Manpower Rationalization
through Redeployment 5 30 - Excellent
25 - Very Good20 - Good15 - Averagelt15 -Poor
TranferOrder for re-deploymentand VRSScheme fromTime to Time
14 Attrition as of totalemployees ()
5 10 or below - Excellent20 - Very Good25 - Good30 - Averagegt30 - Poor
AttritionRegister
10 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
15 Presence of MentorshipDevelopment Programme -Nos of Mentors ampMentees()
YesNO Numbers
5 No Formulation of the Policy MentorPolicy
16 FormulationImplementationof systems for managementof Talent such as - Jobrotation system rewardsystem sponsoring srexecutives for AdvancedManagement Programmegrowth opportunities etc
Schemes Initiatives amptheir details
5 Formulation of the Policy Policy onManagementof Talent
Total (C) 20
D Enabling Creativity amp Innovation
17 Nos of Nominations entriessubmitted for National Awards(PM Shram Awards VishwakarmaRashtriya Puraskar)
Nos ofnominations
entries submittedfor national awards
5 1 No of Entry for the National Award Entries
18 Number of suggestions generatedper employee per year
Nos per employee 5 Formulation of the Policy Policy onsuggestionScheme
19 of Quality Circle projectscompleted against total Qualitycircle projects undertaken in ayear
fulfilment 5 Formulation of the policy on KAIZEN instead ofQuality Circle
Policy onKAIZEN
Total (D) 15
11 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
E Employee Relations amp Welfare
20 Effectiveness of GrievanceRedressal system - ofgrievances settled vis-agrave-visreceived during the year
settlement 4 70 - Excellent60 - Very Good50 - Good45 - Averagelt45 Poor
GrievanceRegister
21 Pension medicare Yogaclasses to reduce stresswhere the job is stressfulsetting up of wellness centresuch as Gym etc
4 120 -(gt 4 Programme)- Excellent100 - (gt3 Programme)- Very Good90 - (gt2 Programme) - Good85 - 1 programme)-Averagelt85 -No programme- Poor
TrainingComplitionSchedule
22 Employee satisfaction survey- ESI measure in
4 Formulation of the policy and designingof the Feedback System
ESS policy
23 Formulation ampImplementation of SocialSecurity Scheme
Yes No 4 Formulation and Documentation of theSSS
SSSDocument
24 Number of structuredmeetings with employeesrepresentatives
Number ofmeetings
4 3 Nos - Excellent2 Nos - Very Good amp Good1 No - Averagelt No Meeting - Poor
Minutes ofthe Meeting
Total (E) 20
12 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
F HR Branding amp Excellence - Indicate achievement in this field for initiatives such as25 Benchmarking projects
undertaken in area of HRDetailsregarding theinitiatives to begiven alongwithachievements
10
Induction of the KRA based e-PMSsystem
E-PMSsystem itself
Total (F) 10Grand Total (A-F) 100
NB Total score out of 100 awarded on HRM to CPSE will be converted into score out of 5 in MoU on pro-rata basis() These parameters are applicable only on A amp B Category employees only() This parameter is for the group C and D category employee
Annexure-B
RampD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific RampD Plan and RampDBudget passed by its Board will automatically be rated as Poor in RampD ofMoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Table-1 Mandatory Parameter - Total RampD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Unit Weightage Performance Target Achievement
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 Total RampD
Expenditureas of PAT(Pleaserefer para38 (i) oftheGuideline)
25 05 ofPAT
045of PAT
04of
PAT
035of PAT
03of
PAT
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
14 | P a g e
Table-2 Projects chosen by CPSE
At the time of draft MoU Every year CPSEs shall submit RampD projects (Maharatna ampNavratna-Five projects Miniratna 0I amp II and other CPSEs below - Three projectsalongwith one most importantvitalkey performance Indicator to Task force at the time ofdraft MoU The Task Force will approve the same or add any other RampD projects alongwithperformance indicator(s)
At the time of MoU Evaluation The verification of achievement in respect of approvedperformance indicator(s) and evaluationrating of each RampD Project will be done byIndependent ExpertResearch Advisory Committee of CPSE Such evaluationrating will beconsidered accepted by Task Force during evaluation for allotting MoU score on RampD
Target Value
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10SlNo
ProjectsChosen
(Annex-I)
PerformanceIndicator
(Annex-II)
Wight-age
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor Actual
21 Admn Blockat MDURohtak
Development of softwareto monitortimelycompletionof projects ampFeedback onits efficacy
10 On amp beforescheduleddate ie310313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
22 ExaminationWing atMDURohtak
05 On amp beforescheduleddate ie150313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
23 Study onEconomisingof PrefabStructure
10 20032013 250313
280313
310313
After310313
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score on RampD 5
Total allotted score for both tables
ANNEXURE- CPROJECT IMPLEMENTATION TARGETS (MILE STONE MOU 2012-13)
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
MOU TARGETS FOR CSR PROJECTS ( MOU 2012-13)Annexure - D
(Rs Lacs)S
NoName of Project Unit Weigh-
tageTgtExp
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor DocumentaryEvidence forevaluation
1 Merit-cum-Means ScholarshipScheme (100 expendituresupport) preferably for girlstudents
RsLacs
1 300 500 400 300 200 100 MOU withLoombaFoundation ampExpenditureStatement
2 Conducting Skills andEntrepreneurship DevelopmentProgram through trainingpartners of National SkillDevelopment Corporation
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 MOU withAgency andExpenditureStatement
3 Repair of Schools ProvidingToilets in Schools
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 RA Bill
4 Providing 5 nos Ambulance Mobile Medical Units withrunning cost of mobileMedicare Unit (for three years)
RsLacs
1 7000 8470 7700 7000 6300 5670 Statement Bill
5 Construction of night shelters RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
6 Construction of Road side BusStand
RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
TOTAL 500 13300 16390 14700 13300 11300 9390
18 | P a g e
CALCULATION OF BUDGETED EXPENDITURE FOR CSRACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR 2012-13
(Rs in Cr)-- Profit After Tax (PAT) for the year 2009-10 116500
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 forthe year 2010-11
3495
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities forthe year 2010-11
1720
-- Amount carried forward for the next year ie 2011-12
1775 A
-- PAT for the year 2010-11 140340
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2011-12
4210 B
-- Total Budget for the year 2011-12 (A+B) 5985 C
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities for theyear 2011-12
2650
-- Amount to be carried forward for the next year ie2012-13
3335 D
-- PAT for the year 2011-12 135420
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2012-13
4063 E
-- Total Budget for the year 2012-13 (D+E) 7398 F
20 | P a g e
Annexure-E
SD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific SD Plan and SDBudget passed by its Board or its Designated Committee will automatically berated as Poor in SD of MoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Sl No Activity
1 Whether Specific SD Plan andBudget passed by Board or itsDesignated Committee
YesNo
No and Date of Board Resolution
1 2
Table-1 SD Committee details
Board LevelDesignatedCommittee Name
Chairman of BoardLevel DesignatedCommittee
Number ofRegular meetingsheld
Key decisionsduring the year
1 2 3 4
4 4
21 | P a g e
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-2 Total SD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Target Value as of PAT
Total Expenditure(Current FY)(Rs in Lacs)
Profit after tax(Previous FY)(Rs in Lacs)
ActualExpenditure as
of PAT
1 2 3 405 x 13542 - 13542 68
Total score for this Table 10
Score allotted by the Task Force
Note The projected annual expenditure as of the PAT for the performance yearwill be considered as target for the year
Table 3 Projects chosen by CPSE
SlNo
ScheduleAB
ProjectActivity
(Please referAnnex-I)
Performance Indicator(please refer Annex-II and Para 653 of
guidelines)
TotalExpenditure
onProjectActi
vity(Rs inLacs)
DurationSML
Target Set(On a five
pointscale
Para 663of
guidelines
TargetAchiev
ed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 A NIT
DurgapurRain waterharvesting
Project objectives -To gainfully use rainwater
EnvironmentCondition Indicator(ECI)- To rechargeground water
Rs 12 lac L 5
22 | P a g e
ManagementPerformance Indicator(MPI)-One trainingon rain waterharvesting
2 B Training Projects objectives- To increaseawareness Knowledge
MPI - Implementationof policy on SD
Rs 1 Lac S 5
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-4 - Evaluation of Projects
No of projects evaluated by an Independent External AgencyExpertConsultant etc
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
3 | P a g e
OBJECTIVES
1 Implementing management practices that encourage valueadded innovative construction services delivery
2 Ensuring the long-term viability of the company throughprudent financial management and the provision of efficientand effective services
3 Managing industry organizational and contractualrelationships in an ethical fair and professional manner
4 Maintaining the flexibility of structure policies and systemnecessary to accomplish the corporate mission in the face ofchanging circumstances and needs
5 Conducting operations in a way that helps protect andpromote the natural environment
6 Building brand awareness
7 Maintaining Human resources management practices thatadvocate and advance the well-being of employees as wellas their personal and professional development
8 Adhering to all statutory requirements public policyregulations and guidelines
9 Continuing participation in the Government initiatives fordevelopment of remote areas
10 To achieve a more diversified revenue base
4 | P a g e
PART-II
AUTONOMY AND DELEGATION OF FINANCIAL POWERS
- NIL -
P A R T -I IIP e r fo rm a n c e E v alu a tio n C r ite r ia a n d T a r g e t s
N A T IO N A L B U IL D IN G S C O N S T R U C T IO N C O R P O R A T IO N L IM IT E DM O U As s e ss m en t F o rm at 2 01 2 - 20 1 3
6 | P a g e
7 | P a g e
Annexure-A
Template for HRM Performance Evaluation under Memorandum of UnderstandingSl
NoHRM - PERFORMANCE
INDICATORSMeasurement Unit Weig
htageTarget value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
A Competency amp Leadership DevelopmentA1 Compulsory1 actualization of Training
Plan amp Training Days peremployee per year
fulfilment ampDays per
employee peryear
5 027 day employee year -Excellent025 day employee year - Very Good020 day employee year - Good018 day employee year -Averagelt018 day employee year - Poor
Certificationby TrainingHead
2 Developing critical mass ofleaders through a system ofcareer planning ampdevelopment()
fulfilment ofplanned
leadershipdevelopmentprogrammes
5 020 day employee year -Excellent019 day employee year - Very Good018 day employee year - Good017 day employee year -Averagelt017 day employee year - Poor
Certificationby TrainingHead
3 Training budget as ofemployee cost
of employeescost
5 025 - Excellent020 - Very Good015 - Good010 - Averagelt010 -Poor
ExpensesSheet andBalanceSheet
4 Fulfilment of training planfor Multi-skilling skill Up-gradation of non-executives()
5 5 - Excellent4 - Very Good3 - Good2 - Averagelt2 - Poor
TrainingSheet
Total 20
8 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
A2 Optional (Out of below five one is to be taken in the MOU) - 5 Marks5 of executives covered in
360 degree feedback systemagainst plan
X
Not Opted
6 of Senior level executives(HoDs amp GMs and above)covered in Assessment ampDevelopment Centre
X
Not Opted
7 Training interventions in new advanced technology - fulfilment of training plan innew technology
X
Not Opted
8 Interventions towardsIndustry - Academia Interface()
YesNoDetails
5
YES BIMTECH has been engaged forsupport in MDP programme4 Nos of programme- Excellent3 Nos of Programme - Very Good2 Nos of Programme- Good1 No of Programme- Average0 No of Programme- Poor
Copy ofMOU
9 fulfillmentof Plan forcarrying out CompetencyMapping of employees
X
Not Opted
Total (A1+A2) 25
9 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
B Performance Management10 To ensure implementation of
Bell Curve Approach in PMSrating ()
Yes NO 4 Yes RatingSummaryReport
11 Linkage of DevelopmentalPlan of Executives withPerformance ManagementSystem()
Yes NO 3 Yes TrainingCalander
12 Implementation of PRP linkedto PMS()
Yes NODetails 3 Yes Certificationby HR Head
Total (B) 10C Recruitment Retention amp Talent Management13 Manpower Rationalization
through Redeployment 5 30 - Excellent
25 - Very Good20 - Good15 - Averagelt15 -Poor
TranferOrder for re-deploymentand VRSScheme fromTime to Time
14 Attrition as of totalemployees ()
5 10 or below - Excellent20 - Very Good25 - Good30 - Averagegt30 - Poor
AttritionRegister
10 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
15 Presence of MentorshipDevelopment Programme -Nos of Mentors ampMentees()
YesNO Numbers
5 No Formulation of the Policy MentorPolicy
16 FormulationImplementationof systems for managementof Talent such as - Jobrotation system rewardsystem sponsoring srexecutives for AdvancedManagement Programmegrowth opportunities etc
Schemes Initiatives amptheir details
5 Formulation of the Policy Policy onManagementof Talent
Total (C) 20
D Enabling Creativity amp Innovation
17 Nos of Nominations entriessubmitted for National Awards(PM Shram Awards VishwakarmaRashtriya Puraskar)
Nos ofnominations
entries submittedfor national awards
5 1 No of Entry for the National Award Entries
18 Number of suggestions generatedper employee per year
Nos per employee 5 Formulation of the Policy Policy onsuggestionScheme
19 of Quality Circle projectscompleted against total Qualitycircle projects undertaken in ayear
fulfilment 5 Formulation of the policy on KAIZEN instead ofQuality Circle
Policy onKAIZEN
Total (D) 15
11 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
E Employee Relations amp Welfare
20 Effectiveness of GrievanceRedressal system - ofgrievances settled vis-agrave-visreceived during the year
settlement 4 70 - Excellent60 - Very Good50 - Good45 - Averagelt45 Poor
GrievanceRegister
21 Pension medicare Yogaclasses to reduce stresswhere the job is stressfulsetting up of wellness centresuch as Gym etc
4 120 -(gt 4 Programme)- Excellent100 - (gt3 Programme)- Very Good90 - (gt2 Programme) - Good85 - 1 programme)-Averagelt85 -No programme- Poor
TrainingComplitionSchedule
22 Employee satisfaction survey- ESI measure in
4 Formulation of the policy and designingof the Feedback System
ESS policy
23 Formulation ampImplementation of SocialSecurity Scheme
Yes No 4 Formulation and Documentation of theSSS
SSSDocument
24 Number of structuredmeetings with employeesrepresentatives
Number ofmeetings
4 3 Nos - Excellent2 Nos - Very Good amp Good1 No - Averagelt No Meeting - Poor
Minutes ofthe Meeting
Total (E) 20
12 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
F HR Branding amp Excellence - Indicate achievement in this field for initiatives such as25 Benchmarking projects
undertaken in area of HRDetailsregarding theinitiatives to begiven alongwithachievements
10
Induction of the KRA based e-PMSsystem
E-PMSsystem itself
Total (F) 10Grand Total (A-F) 100
NB Total score out of 100 awarded on HRM to CPSE will be converted into score out of 5 in MoU on pro-rata basis() These parameters are applicable only on A amp B Category employees only() This parameter is for the group C and D category employee
Annexure-B
RampD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific RampD Plan and RampDBudget passed by its Board will automatically be rated as Poor in RampD ofMoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Table-1 Mandatory Parameter - Total RampD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Unit Weightage Performance Target Achievement
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 Total RampD
Expenditureas of PAT(Pleaserefer para38 (i) oftheGuideline)
25 05 ofPAT
045of PAT
04of
PAT
035of PAT
03of
PAT
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
14 | P a g e
Table-2 Projects chosen by CPSE
At the time of draft MoU Every year CPSEs shall submit RampD projects (Maharatna ampNavratna-Five projects Miniratna 0I amp II and other CPSEs below - Three projectsalongwith one most importantvitalkey performance Indicator to Task force at the time ofdraft MoU The Task Force will approve the same or add any other RampD projects alongwithperformance indicator(s)
At the time of MoU Evaluation The verification of achievement in respect of approvedperformance indicator(s) and evaluationrating of each RampD Project will be done byIndependent ExpertResearch Advisory Committee of CPSE Such evaluationrating will beconsidered accepted by Task Force during evaluation for allotting MoU score on RampD
Target Value
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10SlNo
ProjectsChosen
(Annex-I)
PerformanceIndicator
(Annex-II)
Wight-age
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor Actual
21 Admn Blockat MDURohtak
Development of softwareto monitortimelycompletionof projects ampFeedback onits efficacy
10 On amp beforescheduleddate ie310313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
22 ExaminationWing atMDURohtak
05 On amp beforescheduleddate ie150313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
23 Study onEconomisingof PrefabStructure
10 20032013 250313
280313
310313
After310313
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score on RampD 5
Total allotted score for both tables
ANNEXURE- CPROJECT IMPLEMENTATION TARGETS (MILE STONE MOU 2012-13)
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
MOU TARGETS FOR CSR PROJECTS ( MOU 2012-13)Annexure - D
(Rs Lacs)S
NoName of Project Unit Weigh-
tageTgtExp
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor DocumentaryEvidence forevaluation
1 Merit-cum-Means ScholarshipScheme (100 expendituresupport) preferably for girlstudents
RsLacs
1 300 500 400 300 200 100 MOU withLoombaFoundation ampExpenditureStatement
2 Conducting Skills andEntrepreneurship DevelopmentProgram through trainingpartners of National SkillDevelopment Corporation
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 MOU withAgency andExpenditureStatement
3 Repair of Schools ProvidingToilets in Schools
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 RA Bill
4 Providing 5 nos Ambulance Mobile Medical Units withrunning cost of mobileMedicare Unit (for three years)
RsLacs
1 7000 8470 7700 7000 6300 5670 Statement Bill
5 Construction of night shelters RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
6 Construction of Road side BusStand
RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
TOTAL 500 13300 16390 14700 13300 11300 9390
18 | P a g e
CALCULATION OF BUDGETED EXPENDITURE FOR CSRACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR 2012-13
(Rs in Cr)-- Profit After Tax (PAT) for the year 2009-10 116500
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 forthe year 2010-11
3495
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities forthe year 2010-11
1720
-- Amount carried forward for the next year ie 2011-12
1775 A
-- PAT for the year 2010-11 140340
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2011-12
4210 B
-- Total Budget for the year 2011-12 (A+B) 5985 C
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities for theyear 2011-12
2650
-- Amount to be carried forward for the next year ie2012-13
3335 D
-- PAT for the year 2011-12 135420
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2012-13
4063 E
-- Total Budget for the year 2012-13 (D+E) 7398 F
20 | P a g e
Annexure-E
SD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific SD Plan and SDBudget passed by its Board or its Designated Committee will automatically berated as Poor in SD of MoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Sl No Activity
1 Whether Specific SD Plan andBudget passed by Board or itsDesignated Committee
YesNo
No and Date of Board Resolution
1 2
Table-1 SD Committee details
Board LevelDesignatedCommittee Name
Chairman of BoardLevel DesignatedCommittee
Number ofRegular meetingsheld
Key decisionsduring the year
1 2 3 4
4 4
21 | P a g e
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-2 Total SD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Target Value as of PAT
Total Expenditure(Current FY)(Rs in Lacs)
Profit after tax(Previous FY)(Rs in Lacs)
ActualExpenditure as
of PAT
1 2 3 405 x 13542 - 13542 68
Total score for this Table 10
Score allotted by the Task Force
Note The projected annual expenditure as of the PAT for the performance yearwill be considered as target for the year
Table 3 Projects chosen by CPSE
SlNo
ScheduleAB
ProjectActivity
(Please referAnnex-I)
Performance Indicator(please refer Annex-II and Para 653 of
guidelines)
TotalExpenditure
onProjectActi
vity(Rs inLacs)
DurationSML
Target Set(On a five
pointscale
Para 663of
guidelines
TargetAchiev
ed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 A NIT
DurgapurRain waterharvesting
Project objectives -To gainfully use rainwater
EnvironmentCondition Indicator(ECI)- To rechargeground water
Rs 12 lac L 5
22 | P a g e
ManagementPerformance Indicator(MPI)-One trainingon rain waterharvesting
2 B Training Projects objectives- To increaseawareness Knowledge
MPI - Implementationof policy on SD
Rs 1 Lac S 5
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-4 - Evaluation of Projects
No of projects evaluated by an Independent External AgencyExpertConsultant etc
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
4 | P a g e
PART-II
AUTONOMY AND DELEGATION OF FINANCIAL POWERS
- NIL -
P A R T -I IIP e r fo rm a n c e E v alu a tio n C r ite r ia a n d T a r g e t s
N A T IO N A L B U IL D IN G S C O N S T R U C T IO N C O R P O R A T IO N L IM IT E DM O U As s e ss m en t F o rm at 2 01 2 - 20 1 3
6 | P a g e
7 | P a g e
Annexure-A
Template for HRM Performance Evaluation under Memorandum of UnderstandingSl
NoHRM - PERFORMANCE
INDICATORSMeasurement Unit Weig
htageTarget value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
A Competency amp Leadership DevelopmentA1 Compulsory1 actualization of Training
Plan amp Training Days peremployee per year
fulfilment ampDays per
employee peryear
5 027 day employee year -Excellent025 day employee year - Very Good020 day employee year - Good018 day employee year -Averagelt018 day employee year - Poor
Certificationby TrainingHead
2 Developing critical mass ofleaders through a system ofcareer planning ampdevelopment()
fulfilment ofplanned
leadershipdevelopmentprogrammes
5 020 day employee year -Excellent019 day employee year - Very Good018 day employee year - Good017 day employee year -Averagelt017 day employee year - Poor
Certificationby TrainingHead
3 Training budget as ofemployee cost
of employeescost
5 025 - Excellent020 - Very Good015 - Good010 - Averagelt010 -Poor
ExpensesSheet andBalanceSheet
4 Fulfilment of training planfor Multi-skilling skill Up-gradation of non-executives()
5 5 - Excellent4 - Very Good3 - Good2 - Averagelt2 - Poor
TrainingSheet
Total 20
8 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
A2 Optional (Out of below five one is to be taken in the MOU) - 5 Marks5 of executives covered in
360 degree feedback systemagainst plan
X
Not Opted
6 of Senior level executives(HoDs amp GMs and above)covered in Assessment ampDevelopment Centre
X
Not Opted
7 Training interventions in new advanced technology - fulfilment of training plan innew technology
X
Not Opted
8 Interventions towardsIndustry - Academia Interface()
YesNoDetails
5
YES BIMTECH has been engaged forsupport in MDP programme4 Nos of programme- Excellent3 Nos of Programme - Very Good2 Nos of Programme- Good1 No of Programme- Average0 No of Programme- Poor
Copy ofMOU
9 fulfillmentof Plan forcarrying out CompetencyMapping of employees
X
Not Opted
Total (A1+A2) 25
9 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
B Performance Management10 To ensure implementation of
Bell Curve Approach in PMSrating ()
Yes NO 4 Yes RatingSummaryReport
11 Linkage of DevelopmentalPlan of Executives withPerformance ManagementSystem()
Yes NO 3 Yes TrainingCalander
12 Implementation of PRP linkedto PMS()
Yes NODetails 3 Yes Certificationby HR Head
Total (B) 10C Recruitment Retention amp Talent Management13 Manpower Rationalization
through Redeployment 5 30 - Excellent
25 - Very Good20 - Good15 - Averagelt15 -Poor
TranferOrder for re-deploymentand VRSScheme fromTime to Time
14 Attrition as of totalemployees ()
5 10 or below - Excellent20 - Very Good25 - Good30 - Averagegt30 - Poor
AttritionRegister
10 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
15 Presence of MentorshipDevelopment Programme -Nos of Mentors ampMentees()
YesNO Numbers
5 No Formulation of the Policy MentorPolicy
16 FormulationImplementationof systems for managementof Talent such as - Jobrotation system rewardsystem sponsoring srexecutives for AdvancedManagement Programmegrowth opportunities etc
Schemes Initiatives amptheir details
5 Formulation of the Policy Policy onManagementof Talent
Total (C) 20
D Enabling Creativity amp Innovation
17 Nos of Nominations entriessubmitted for National Awards(PM Shram Awards VishwakarmaRashtriya Puraskar)
Nos ofnominations
entries submittedfor national awards
5 1 No of Entry for the National Award Entries
18 Number of suggestions generatedper employee per year
Nos per employee 5 Formulation of the Policy Policy onsuggestionScheme
19 of Quality Circle projectscompleted against total Qualitycircle projects undertaken in ayear
fulfilment 5 Formulation of the policy on KAIZEN instead ofQuality Circle
Policy onKAIZEN
Total (D) 15
11 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
E Employee Relations amp Welfare
20 Effectiveness of GrievanceRedressal system - ofgrievances settled vis-agrave-visreceived during the year
settlement 4 70 - Excellent60 - Very Good50 - Good45 - Averagelt45 Poor
GrievanceRegister
21 Pension medicare Yogaclasses to reduce stresswhere the job is stressfulsetting up of wellness centresuch as Gym etc
4 120 -(gt 4 Programme)- Excellent100 - (gt3 Programme)- Very Good90 - (gt2 Programme) - Good85 - 1 programme)-Averagelt85 -No programme- Poor
TrainingComplitionSchedule
22 Employee satisfaction survey- ESI measure in
4 Formulation of the policy and designingof the Feedback System
ESS policy
23 Formulation ampImplementation of SocialSecurity Scheme
Yes No 4 Formulation and Documentation of theSSS
SSSDocument
24 Number of structuredmeetings with employeesrepresentatives
Number ofmeetings
4 3 Nos - Excellent2 Nos - Very Good amp Good1 No - Averagelt No Meeting - Poor
Minutes ofthe Meeting
Total (E) 20
12 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
F HR Branding amp Excellence - Indicate achievement in this field for initiatives such as25 Benchmarking projects
undertaken in area of HRDetailsregarding theinitiatives to begiven alongwithachievements
10
Induction of the KRA based e-PMSsystem
E-PMSsystem itself
Total (F) 10Grand Total (A-F) 100
NB Total score out of 100 awarded on HRM to CPSE will be converted into score out of 5 in MoU on pro-rata basis() These parameters are applicable only on A amp B Category employees only() This parameter is for the group C and D category employee
Annexure-B
RampD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific RampD Plan and RampDBudget passed by its Board will automatically be rated as Poor in RampD ofMoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Table-1 Mandatory Parameter - Total RampD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Unit Weightage Performance Target Achievement
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 Total RampD
Expenditureas of PAT(Pleaserefer para38 (i) oftheGuideline)
25 05 ofPAT
045of PAT
04of
PAT
035of PAT
03of
PAT
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
14 | P a g e
Table-2 Projects chosen by CPSE
At the time of draft MoU Every year CPSEs shall submit RampD projects (Maharatna ampNavratna-Five projects Miniratna 0I amp II and other CPSEs below - Three projectsalongwith one most importantvitalkey performance Indicator to Task force at the time ofdraft MoU The Task Force will approve the same or add any other RampD projects alongwithperformance indicator(s)
At the time of MoU Evaluation The verification of achievement in respect of approvedperformance indicator(s) and evaluationrating of each RampD Project will be done byIndependent ExpertResearch Advisory Committee of CPSE Such evaluationrating will beconsidered accepted by Task Force during evaluation for allotting MoU score on RampD
Target Value
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10SlNo
ProjectsChosen
(Annex-I)
PerformanceIndicator
(Annex-II)
Wight-age
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor Actual
21 Admn Blockat MDURohtak
Development of softwareto monitortimelycompletionof projects ampFeedback onits efficacy
10 On amp beforescheduleddate ie310313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
22 ExaminationWing atMDURohtak
05 On amp beforescheduleddate ie150313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
23 Study onEconomisingof PrefabStructure
10 20032013 250313
280313
310313
After310313
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score on RampD 5
Total allotted score for both tables
ANNEXURE- CPROJECT IMPLEMENTATION TARGETS (MILE STONE MOU 2012-13)
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
MOU TARGETS FOR CSR PROJECTS ( MOU 2012-13)Annexure - D
(Rs Lacs)S
NoName of Project Unit Weigh-
tageTgtExp
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor DocumentaryEvidence forevaluation
1 Merit-cum-Means ScholarshipScheme (100 expendituresupport) preferably for girlstudents
RsLacs
1 300 500 400 300 200 100 MOU withLoombaFoundation ampExpenditureStatement
2 Conducting Skills andEntrepreneurship DevelopmentProgram through trainingpartners of National SkillDevelopment Corporation
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 MOU withAgency andExpenditureStatement
3 Repair of Schools ProvidingToilets in Schools
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 RA Bill
4 Providing 5 nos Ambulance Mobile Medical Units withrunning cost of mobileMedicare Unit (for three years)
RsLacs
1 7000 8470 7700 7000 6300 5670 Statement Bill
5 Construction of night shelters RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
6 Construction of Road side BusStand
RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
TOTAL 500 13300 16390 14700 13300 11300 9390
18 | P a g e
CALCULATION OF BUDGETED EXPENDITURE FOR CSRACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR 2012-13
(Rs in Cr)-- Profit After Tax (PAT) for the year 2009-10 116500
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 forthe year 2010-11
3495
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities forthe year 2010-11
1720
-- Amount carried forward for the next year ie 2011-12
1775 A
-- PAT for the year 2010-11 140340
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2011-12
4210 B
-- Total Budget for the year 2011-12 (A+B) 5985 C
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities for theyear 2011-12
2650
-- Amount to be carried forward for the next year ie2012-13
3335 D
-- PAT for the year 2011-12 135420
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2012-13
4063 E
-- Total Budget for the year 2012-13 (D+E) 7398 F
20 | P a g e
Annexure-E
SD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific SD Plan and SDBudget passed by its Board or its Designated Committee will automatically berated as Poor in SD of MoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Sl No Activity
1 Whether Specific SD Plan andBudget passed by Board or itsDesignated Committee
YesNo
No and Date of Board Resolution
1 2
Table-1 SD Committee details
Board LevelDesignatedCommittee Name
Chairman of BoardLevel DesignatedCommittee
Number ofRegular meetingsheld
Key decisionsduring the year
1 2 3 4
4 4
21 | P a g e
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-2 Total SD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Target Value as of PAT
Total Expenditure(Current FY)(Rs in Lacs)
Profit after tax(Previous FY)(Rs in Lacs)
ActualExpenditure as
of PAT
1 2 3 405 x 13542 - 13542 68
Total score for this Table 10
Score allotted by the Task Force
Note The projected annual expenditure as of the PAT for the performance yearwill be considered as target for the year
Table 3 Projects chosen by CPSE
SlNo
ScheduleAB
ProjectActivity
(Please referAnnex-I)
Performance Indicator(please refer Annex-II and Para 653 of
guidelines)
TotalExpenditure
onProjectActi
vity(Rs inLacs)
DurationSML
Target Set(On a five
pointscale
Para 663of
guidelines
TargetAchiev
ed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 A NIT
DurgapurRain waterharvesting
Project objectives -To gainfully use rainwater
EnvironmentCondition Indicator(ECI)- To rechargeground water
Rs 12 lac L 5
22 | P a g e
ManagementPerformance Indicator(MPI)-One trainingon rain waterharvesting
2 B Training Projects objectives- To increaseawareness Knowledge
MPI - Implementationof policy on SD
Rs 1 Lac S 5
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-4 - Evaluation of Projects
No of projects evaluated by an Independent External AgencyExpertConsultant etc
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
P A R T -I IIP e r fo rm a n c e E v alu a tio n C r ite r ia a n d T a r g e t s
N A T IO N A L B U IL D IN G S C O N S T R U C T IO N C O R P O R A T IO N L IM IT E DM O U As s e ss m en t F o rm at 2 01 2 - 20 1 3
6 | P a g e
7 | P a g e
Annexure-A
Template for HRM Performance Evaluation under Memorandum of UnderstandingSl
NoHRM - PERFORMANCE
INDICATORSMeasurement Unit Weig
htageTarget value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
A Competency amp Leadership DevelopmentA1 Compulsory1 actualization of Training
Plan amp Training Days peremployee per year
fulfilment ampDays per
employee peryear
5 027 day employee year -Excellent025 day employee year - Very Good020 day employee year - Good018 day employee year -Averagelt018 day employee year - Poor
Certificationby TrainingHead
2 Developing critical mass ofleaders through a system ofcareer planning ampdevelopment()
fulfilment ofplanned
leadershipdevelopmentprogrammes
5 020 day employee year -Excellent019 day employee year - Very Good018 day employee year - Good017 day employee year -Averagelt017 day employee year - Poor
Certificationby TrainingHead
3 Training budget as ofemployee cost
of employeescost
5 025 - Excellent020 - Very Good015 - Good010 - Averagelt010 -Poor
ExpensesSheet andBalanceSheet
4 Fulfilment of training planfor Multi-skilling skill Up-gradation of non-executives()
5 5 - Excellent4 - Very Good3 - Good2 - Averagelt2 - Poor
TrainingSheet
Total 20
8 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
A2 Optional (Out of below five one is to be taken in the MOU) - 5 Marks5 of executives covered in
360 degree feedback systemagainst plan
X
Not Opted
6 of Senior level executives(HoDs amp GMs and above)covered in Assessment ampDevelopment Centre
X
Not Opted
7 Training interventions in new advanced technology - fulfilment of training plan innew technology
X
Not Opted
8 Interventions towardsIndustry - Academia Interface()
YesNoDetails
5
YES BIMTECH has been engaged forsupport in MDP programme4 Nos of programme- Excellent3 Nos of Programme - Very Good2 Nos of Programme- Good1 No of Programme- Average0 No of Programme- Poor
Copy ofMOU
9 fulfillmentof Plan forcarrying out CompetencyMapping of employees
X
Not Opted
Total (A1+A2) 25
9 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
B Performance Management10 To ensure implementation of
Bell Curve Approach in PMSrating ()
Yes NO 4 Yes RatingSummaryReport
11 Linkage of DevelopmentalPlan of Executives withPerformance ManagementSystem()
Yes NO 3 Yes TrainingCalander
12 Implementation of PRP linkedto PMS()
Yes NODetails 3 Yes Certificationby HR Head
Total (B) 10C Recruitment Retention amp Talent Management13 Manpower Rationalization
through Redeployment 5 30 - Excellent
25 - Very Good20 - Good15 - Averagelt15 -Poor
TranferOrder for re-deploymentand VRSScheme fromTime to Time
14 Attrition as of totalemployees ()
5 10 or below - Excellent20 - Very Good25 - Good30 - Averagegt30 - Poor
AttritionRegister
10 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
15 Presence of MentorshipDevelopment Programme -Nos of Mentors ampMentees()
YesNO Numbers
5 No Formulation of the Policy MentorPolicy
16 FormulationImplementationof systems for managementof Talent such as - Jobrotation system rewardsystem sponsoring srexecutives for AdvancedManagement Programmegrowth opportunities etc
Schemes Initiatives amptheir details
5 Formulation of the Policy Policy onManagementof Talent
Total (C) 20
D Enabling Creativity amp Innovation
17 Nos of Nominations entriessubmitted for National Awards(PM Shram Awards VishwakarmaRashtriya Puraskar)
Nos ofnominations
entries submittedfor national awards
5 1 No of Entry for the National Award Entries
18 Number of suggestions generatedper employee per year
Nos per employee 5 Formulation of the Policy Policy onsuggestionScheme
19 of Quality Circle projectscompleted against total Qualitycircle projects undertaken in ayear
fulfilment 5 Formulation of the policy on KAIZEN instead ofQuality Circle
Policy onKAIZEN
Total (D) 15
11 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
E Employee Relations amp Welfare
20 Effectiveness of GrievanceRedressal system - ofgrievances settled vis-agrave-visreceived during the year
settlement 4 70 - Excellent60 - Very Good50 - Good45 - Averagelt45 Poor
GrievanceRegister
21 Pension medicare Yogaclasses to reduce stresswhere the job is stressfulsetting up of wellness centresuch as Gym etc
4 120 -(gt 4 Programme)- Excellent100 - (gt3 Programme)- Very Good90 - (gt2 Programme) - Good85 - 1 programme)-Averagelt85 -No programme- Poor
TrainingComplitionSchedule
22 Employee satisfaction survey- ESI measure in
4 Formulation of the policy and designingof the Feedback System
ESS policy
23 Formulation ampImplementation of SocialSecurity Scheme
Yes No 4 Formulation and Documentation of theSSS
SSSDocument
24 Number of structuredmeetings with employeesrepresentatives
Number ofmeetings
4 3 Nos - Excellent2 Nos - Very Good amp Good1 No - Averagelt No Meeting - Poor
Minutes ofthe Meeting
Total (E) 20
12 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
F HR Branding amp Excellence - Indicate achievement in this field for initiatives such as25 Benchmarking projects
undertaken in area of HRDetailsregarding theinitiatives to begiven alongwithachievements
10
Induction of the KRA based e-PMSsystem
E-PMSsystem itself
Total (F) 10Grand Total (A-F) 100
NB Total score out of 100 awarded on HRM to CPSE will be converted into score out of 5 in MoU on pro-rata basis() These parameters are applicable only on A amp B Category employees only() This parameter is for the group C and D category employee
Annexure-B
RampD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific RampD Plan and RampDBudget passed by its Board will automatically be rated as Poor in RampD ofMoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Table-1 Mandatory Parameter - Total RampD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Unit Weightage Performance Target Achievement
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 Total RampD
Expenditureas of PAT(Pleaserefer para38 (i) oftheGuideline)
25 05 ofPAT
045of PAT
04of
PAT
035of PAT
03of
PAT
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
14 | P a g e
Table-2 Projects chosen by CPSE
At the time of draft MoU Every year CPSEs shall submit RampD projects (Maharatna ampNavratna-Five projects Miniratna 0I amp II and other CPSEs below - Three projectsalongwith one most importantvitalkey performance Indicator to Task force at the time ofdraft MoU The Task Force will approve the same or add any other RampD projects alongwithperformance indicator(s)
At the time of MoU Evaluation The verification of achievement in respect of approvedperformance indicator(s) and evaluationrating of each RampD Project will be done byIndependent ExpertResearch Advisory Committee of CPSE Such evaluationrating will beconsidered accepted by Task Force during evaluation for allotting MoU score on RampD
Target Value
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10SlNo
ProjectsChosen
(Annex-I)
PerformanceIndicator
(Annex-II)
Wight-age
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor Actual
21 Admn Blockat MDURohtak
Development of softwareto monitortimelycompletionof projects ampFeedback onits efficacy
10 On amp beforescheduleddate ie310313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
22 ExaminationWing atMDURohtak
05 On amp beforescheduleddate ie150313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
23 Study onEconomisingof PrefabStructure
10 20032013 250313
280313
310313
After310313
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score on RampD 5
Total allotted score for both tables
ANNEXURE- CPROJECT IMPLEMENTATION TARGETS (MILE STONE MOU 2012-13)
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
MOU TARGETS FOR CSR PROJECTS ( MOU 2012-13)Annexure - D
(Rs Lacs)S
NoName of Project Unit Weigh-
tageTgtExp
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor DocumentaryEvidence forevaluation
1 Merit-cum-Means ScholarshipScheme (100 expendituresupport) preferably for girlstudents
RsLacs
1 300 500 400 300 200 100 MOU withLoombaFoundation ampExpenditureStatement
2 Conducting Skills andEntrepreneurship DevelopmentProgram through trainingpartners of National SkillDevelopment Corporation
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 MOU withAgency andExpenditureStatement
3 Repair of Schools ProvidingToilets in Schools
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 RA Bill
4 Providing 5 nos Ambulance Mobile Medical Units withrunning cost of mobileMedicare Unit (for three years)
RsLacs
1 7000 8470 7700 7000 6300 5670 Statement Bill
5 Construction of night shelters RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
6 Construction of Road side BusStand
RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
TOTAL 500 13300 16390 14700 13300 11300 9390
18 | P a g e
CALCULATION OF BUDGETED EXPENDITURE FOR CSRACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR 2012-13
(Rs in Cr)-- Profit After Tax (PAT) for the year 2009-10 116500
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 forthe year 2010-11
3495
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities forthe year 2010-11
1720
-- Amount carried forward for the next year ie 2011-12
1775 A
-- PAT for the year 2010-11 140340
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2011-12
4210 B
-- Total Budget for the year 2011-12 (A+B) 5985 C
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities for theyear 2011-12
2650
-- Amount to be carried forward for the next year ie2012-13
3335 D
-- PAT for the year 2011-12 135420
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2012-13
4063 E
-- Total Budget for the year 2012-13 (D+E) 7398 F
20 | P a g e
Annexure-E
SD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific SD Plan and SDBudget passed by its Board or its Designated Committee will automatically berated as Poor in SD of MoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Sl No Activity
1 Whether Specific SD Plan andBudget passed by Board or itsDesignated Committee
YesNo
No and Date of Board Resolution
1 2
Table-1 SD Committee details
Board LevelDesignatedCommittee Name
Chairman of BoardLevel DesignatedCommittee
Number ofRegular meetingsheld
Key decisionsduring the year
1 2 3 4
4 4
21 | P a g e
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-2 Total SD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Target Value as of PAT
Total Expenditure(Current FY)(Rs in Lacs)
Profit after tax(Previous FY)(Rs in Lacs)
ActualExpenditure as
of PAT
1 2 3 405 x 13542 - 13542 68
Total score for this Table 10
Score allotted by the Task Force
Note The projected annual expenditure as of the PAT for the performance yearwill be considered as target for the year
Table 3 Projects chosen by CPSE
SlNo
ScheduleAB
ProjectActivity
(Please referAnnex-I)
Performance Indicator(please refer Annex-II and Para 653 of
guidelines)
TotalExpenditure
onProjectActi
vity(Rs inLacs)
DurationSML
Target Set(On a five
pointscale
Para 663of
guidelines
TargetAchiev
ed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 A NIT
DurgapurRain waterharvesting
Project objectives -To gainfully use rainwater
EnvironmentCondition Indicator(ECI)- To rechargeground water
Rs 12 lac L 5
22 | P a g e
ManagementPerformance Indicator(MPI)-One trainingon rain waterharvesting
2 B Training Projects objectives- To increaseawareness Knowledge
MPI - Implementationof policy on SD
Rs 1 Lac S 5
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-4 - Evaluation of Projects
No of projects evaluated by an Independent External AgencyExpertConsultant etc
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
6 | P a g e
7 | P a g e
Annexure-A
Template for HRM Performance Evaluation under Memorandum of UnderstandingSl
NoHRM - PERFORMANCE
INDICATORSMeasurement Unit Weig
htageTarget value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
A Competency amp Leadership DevelopmentA1 Compulsory1 actualization of Training
Plan amp Training Days peremployee per year
fulfilment ampDays per
employee peryear
5 027 day employee year -Excellent025 day employee year - Very Good020 day employee year - Good018 day employee year -Averagelt018 day employee year - Poor
Certificationby TrainingHead
2 Developing critical mass ofleaders through a system ofcareer planning ampdevelopment()
fulfilment ofplanned
leadershipdevelopmentprogrammes
5 020 day employee year -Excellent019 day employee year - Very Good018 day employee year - Good017 day employee year -Averagelt017 day employee year - Poor
Certificationby TrainingHead
3 Training budget as ofemployee cost
of employeescost
5 025 - Excellent020 - Very Good015 - Good010 - Averagelt010 -Poor
ExpensesSheet andBalanceSheet
4 Fulfilment of training planfor Multi-skilling skill Up-gradation of non-executives()
5 5 - Excellent4 - Very Good3 - Good2 - Averagelt2 - Poor
TrainingSheet
Total 20
8 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
A2 Optional (Out of below five one is to be taken in the MOU) - 5 Marks5 of executives covered in
360 degree feedback systemagainst plan
X
Not Opted
6 of Senior level executives(HoDs amp GMs and above)covered in Assessment ampDevelopment Centre
X
Not Opted
7 Training interventions in new advanced technology - fulfilment of training plan innew technology
X
Not Opted
8 Interventions towardsIndustry - Academia Interface()
YesNoDetails
5
YES BIMTECH has been engaged forsupport in MDP programme4 Nos of programme- Excellent3 Nos of Programme - Very Good2 Nos of Programme- Good1 No of Programme- Average0 No of Programme- Poor
Copy ofMOU
9 fulfillmentof Plan forcarrying out CompetencyMapping of employees
X
Not Opted
Total (A1+A2) 25
9 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
B Performance Management10 To ensure implementation of
Bell Curve Approach in PMSrating ()
Yes NO 4 Yes RatingSummaryReport
11 Linkage of DevelopmentalPlan of Executives withPerformance ManagementSystem()
Yes NO 3 Yes TrainingCalander
12 Implementation of PRP linkedto PMS()
Yes NODetails 3 Yes Certificationby HR Head
Total (B) 10C Recruitment Retention amp Talent Management13 Manpower Rationalization
through Redeployment 5 30 - Excellent
25 - Very Good20 - Good15 - Averagelt15 -Poor
TranferOrder for re-deploymentand VRSScheme fromTime to Time
14 Attrition as of totalemployees ()
5 10 or below - Excellent20 - Very Good25 - Good30 - Averagegt30 - Poor
AttritionRegister
10 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
15 Presence of MentorshipDevelopment Programme -Nos of Mentors ampMentees()
YesNO Numbers
5 No Formulation of the Policy MentorPolicy
16 FormulationImplementationof systems for managementof Talent such as - Jobrotation system rewardsystem sponsoring srexecutives for AdvancedManagement Programmegrowth opportunities etc
Schemes Initiatives amptheir details
5 Formulation of the Policy Policy onManagementof Talent
Total (C) 20
D Enabling Creativity amp Innovation
17 Nos of Nominations entriessubmitted for National Awards(PM Shram Awards VishwakarmaRashtriya Puraskar)
Nos ofnominations
entries submittedfor national awards
5 1 No of Entry for the National Award Entries
18 Number of suggestions generatedper employee per year
Nos per employee 5 Formulation of the Policy Policy onsuggestionScheme
19 of Quality Circle projectscompleted against total Qualitycircle projects undertaken in ayear
fulfilment 5 Formulation of the policy on KAIZEN instead ofQuality Circle
Policy onKAIZEN
Total (D) 15
11 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
E Employee Relations amp Welfare
20 Effectiveness of GrievanceRedressal system - ofgrievances settled vis-agrave-visreceived during the year
settlement 4 70 - Excellent60 - Very Good50 - Good45 - Averagelt45 Poor
GrievanceRegister
21 Pension medicare Yogaclasses to reduce stresswhere the job is stressfulsetting up of wellness centresuch as Gym etc
4 120 -(gt 4 Programme)- Excellent100 - (gt3 Programme)- Very Good90 - (gt2 Programme) - Good85 - 1 programme)-Averagelt85 -No programme- Poor
TrainingComplitionSchedule
22 Employee satisfaction survey- ESI measure in
4 Formulation of the policy and designingof the Feedback System
ESS policy
23 Formulation ampImplementation of SocialSecurity Scheme
Yes No 4 Formulation and Documentation of theSSS
SSSDocument
24 Number of structuredmeetings with employeesrepresentatives
Number ofmeetings
4 3 Nos - Excellent2 Nos - Very Good amp Good1 No - Averagelt No Meeting - Poor
Minutes ofthe Meeting
Total (E) 20
12 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
F HR Branding amp Excellence - Indicate achievement in this field for initiatives such as25 Benchmarking projects
undertaken in area of HRDetailsregarding theinitiatives to begiven alongwithachievements
10
Induction of the KRA based e-PMSsystem
E-PMSsystem itself
Total (F) 10Grand Total (A-F) 100
NB Total score out of 100 awarded on HRM to CPSE will be converted into score out of 5 in MoU on pro-rata basis() These parameters are applicable only on A amp B Category employees only() This parameter is for the group C and D category employee
Annexure-B
RampD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific RampD Plan and RampDBudget passed by its Board will automatically be rated as Poor in RampD ofMoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Table-1 Mandatory Parameter - Total RampD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Unit Weightage Performance Target Achievement
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 Total RampD
Expenditureas of PAT(Pleaserefer para38 (i) oftheGuideline)
25 05 ofPAT
045of PAT
04of
PAT
035of PAT
03of
PAT
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
14 | P a g e
Table-2 Projects chosen by CPSE
At the time of draft MoU Every year CPSEs shall submit RampD projects (Maharatna ampNavratna-Five projects Miniratna 0I amp II and other CPSEs below - Three projectsalongwith one most importantvitalkey performance Indicator to Task force at the time ofdraft MoU The Task Force will approve the same or add any other RampD projects alongwithperformance indicator(s)
At the time of MoU Evaluation The verification of achievement in respect of approvedperformance indicator(s) and evaluationrating of each RampD Project will be done byIndependent ExpertResearch Advisory Committee of CPSE Such evaluationrating will beconsidered accepted by Task Force during evaluation for allotting MoU score on RampD
Target Value
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10SlNo
ProjectsChosen
(Annex-I)
PerformanceIndicator
(Annex-II)
Wight-age
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor Actual
21 Admn Blockat MDURohtak
Development of softwareto monitortimelycompletionof projects ampFeedback onits efficacy
10 On amp beforescheduleddate ie310313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
22 ExaminationWing atMDURohtak
05 On amp beforescheduleddate ie150313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
23 Study onEconomisingof PrefabStructure
10 20032013 250313
280313
310313
After310313
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score on RampD 5
Total allotted score for both tables
ANNEXURE- CPROJECT IMPLEMENTATION TARGETS (MILE STONE MOU 2012-13)
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
MOU TARGETS FOR CSR PROJECTS ( MOU 2012-13)Annexure - D
(Rs Lacs)S
NoName of Project Unit Weigh-
tageTgtExp
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor DocumentaryEvidence forevaluation
1 Merit-cum-Means ScholarshipScheme (100 expendituresupport) preferably for girlstudents
RsLacs
1 300 500 400 300 200 100 MOU withLoombaFoundation ampExpenditureStatement
2 Conducting Skills andEntrepreneurship DevelopmentProgram through trainingpartners of National SkillDevelopment Corporation
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 MOU withAgency andExpenditureStatement
3 Repair of Schools ProvidingToilets in Schools
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 RA Bill
4 Providing 5 nos Ambulance Mobile Medical Units withrunning cost of mobileMedicare Unit (for three years)
RsLacs
1 7000 8470 7700 7000 6300 5670 Statement Bill
5 Construction of night shelters RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
6 Construction of Road side BusStand
RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
TOTAL 500 13300 16390 14700 13300 11300 9390
18 | P a g e
CALCULATION OF BUDGETED EXPENDITURE FOR CSRACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR 2012-13
(Rs in Cr)-- Profit After Tax (PAT) for the year 2009-10 116500
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 forthe year 2010-11
3495
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities forthe year 2010-11
1720
-- Amount carried forward for the next year ie 2011-12
1775 A
-- PAT for the year 2010-11 140340
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2011-12
4210 B
-- Total Budget for the year 2011-12 (A+B) 5985 C
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities for theyear 2011-12
2650
-- Amount to be carried forward for the next year ie2012-13
3335 D
-- PAT for the year 2011-12 135420
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2012-13
4063 E
-- Total Budget for the year 2012-13 (D+E) 7398 F
20 | P a g e
Annexure-E
SD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific SD Plan and SDBudget passed by its Board or its Designated Committee will automatically berated as Poor in SD of MoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Sl No Activity
1 Whether Specific SD Plan andBudget passed by Board or itsDesignated Committee
YesNo
No and Date of Board Resolution
1 2
Table-1 SD Committee details
Board LevelDesignatedCommittee Name
Chairman of BoardLevel DesignatedCommittee
Number ofRegular meetingsheld
Key decisionsduring the year
1 2 3 4
4 4
21 | P a g e
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-2 Total SD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Target Value as of PAT
Total Expenditure(Current FY)(Rs in Lacs)
Profit after tax(Previous FY)(Rs in Lacs)
ActualExpenditure as
of PAT
1 2 3 405 x 13542 - 13542 68
Total score for this Table 10
Score allotted by the Task Force
Note The projected annual expenditure as of the PAT for the performance yearwill be considered as target for the year
Table 3 Projects chosen by CPSE
SlNo
ScheduleAB
ProjectActivity
(Please referAnnex-I)
Performance Indicator(please refer Annex-II and Para 653 of
guidelines)
TotalExpenditure
onProjectActi
vity(Rs inLacs)
DurationSML
Target Set(On a five
pointscale
Para 663of
guidelines
TargetAchiev
ed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 A NIT
DurgapurRain waterharvesting
Project objectives -To gainfully use rainwater
EnvironmentCondition Indicator(ECI)- To rechargeground water
Rs 12 lac L 5
22 | P a g e
ManagementPerformance Indicator(MPI)-One trainingon rain waterharvesting
2 B Training Projects objectives- To increaseawareness Knowledge
MPI - Implementationof policy on SD
Rs 1 Lac S 5
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-4 - Evaluation of Projects
No of projects evaluated by an Independent External AgencyExpertConsultant etc
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
7 | P a g e
Annexure-A
Template for HRM Performance Evaluation under Memorandum of UnderstandingSl
NoHRM - PERFORMANCE
INDICATORSMeasurement Unit Weig
htageTarget value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
A Competency amp Leadership DevelopmentA1 Compulsory1 actualization of Training
Plan amp Training Days peremployee per year
fulfilment ampDays per
employee peryear
5 027 day employee year -Excellent025 day employee year - Very Good020 day employee year - Good018 day employee year -Averagelt018 day employee year - Poor
Certificationby TrainingHead
2 Developing critical mass ofleaders through a system ofcareer planning ampdevelopment()
fulfilment ofplanned
leadershipdevelopmentprogrammes
5 020 day employee year -Excellent019 day employee year - Very Good018 day employee year - Good017 day employee year -Averagelt017 day employee year - Poor
Certificationby TrainingHead
3 Training budget as ofemployee cost
of employeescost
5 025 - Excellent020 - Very Good015 - Good010 - Averagelt010 -Poor
ExpensesSheet andBalanceSheet
4 Fulfilment of training planfor Multi-skilling skill Up-gradation of non-executives()
5 5 - Excellent4 - Very Good3 - Good2 - Averagelt2 - Poor
TrainingSheet
Total 20
8 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
A2 Optional (Out of below five one is to be taken in the MOU) - 5 Marks5 of executives covered in
360 degree feedback systemagainst plan
X
Not Opted
6 of Senior level executives(HoDs amp GMs and above)covered in Assessment ampDevelopment Centre
X
Not Opted
7 Training interventions in new advanced technology - fulfilment of training plan innew technology
X
Not Opted
8 Interventions towardsIndustry - Academia Interface()
YesNoDetails
5
YES BIMTECH has been engaged forsupport in MDP programme4 Nos of programme- Excellent3 Nos of Programme - Very Good2 Nos of Programme- Good1 No of Programme- Average0 No of Programme- Poor
Copy ofMOU
9 fulfillmentof Plan forcarrying out CompetencyMapping of employees
X
Not Opted
Total (A1+A2) 25
9 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
B Performance Management10 To ensure implementation of
Bell Curve Approach in PMSrating ()
Yes NO 4 Yes RatingSummaryReport
11 Linkage of DevelopmentalPlan of Executives withPerformance ManagementSystem()
Yes NO 3 Yes TrainingCalander
12 Implementation of PRP linkedto PMS()
Yes NODetails 3 Yes Certificationby HR Head
Total (B) 10C Recruitment Retention amp Talent Management13 Manpower Rationalization
through Redeployment 5 30 - Excellent
25 - Very Good20 - Good15 - Averagelt15 -Poor
TranferOrder for re-deploymentand VRSScheme fromTime to Time
14 Attrition as of totalemployees ()
5 10 or below - Excellent20 - Very Good25 - Good30 - Averagegt30 - Poor
AttritionRegister
10 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
15 Presence of MentorshipDevelopment Programme -Nos of Mentors ampMentees()
YesNO Numbers
5 No Formulation of the Policy MentorPolicy
16 FormulationImplementationof systems for managementof Talent such as - Jobrotation system rewardsystem sponsoring srexecutives for AdvancedManagement Programmegrowth opportunities etc
Schemes Initiatives amptheir details
5 Formulation of the Policy Policy onManagementof Talent
Total (C) 20
D Enabling Creativity amp Innovation
17 Nos of Nominations entriessubmitted for National Awards(PM Shram Awards VishwakarmaRashtriya Puraskar)
Nos ofnominations
entries submittedfor national awards
5 1 No of Entry for the National Award Entries
18 Number of suggestions generatedper employee per year
Nos per employee 5 Formulation of the Policy Policy onsuggestionScheme
19 of Quality Circle projectscompleted against total Qualitycircle projects undertaken in ayear
fulfilment 5 Formulation of the policy on KAIZEN instead ofQuality Circle
Policy onKAIZEN
Total (D) 15
11 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
E Employee Relations amp Welfare
20 Effectiveness of GrievanceRedressal system - ofgrievances settled vis-agrave-visreceived during the year
settlement 4 70 - Excellent60 - Very Good50 - Good45 - Averagelt45 Poor
GrievanceRegister
21 Pension medicare Yogaclasses to reduce stresswhere the job is stressfulsetting up of wellness centresuch as Gym etc
4 120 -(gt 4 Programme)- Excellent100 - (gt3 Programme)- Very Good90 - (gt2 Programme) - Good85 - 1 programme)-Averagelt85 -No programme- Poor
TrainingComplitionSchedule
22 Employee satisfaction survey- ESI measure in
4 Formulation of the policy and designingof the Feedback System
ESS policy
23 Formulation ampImplementation of SocialSecurity Scheme
Yes No 4 Formulation and Documentation of theSSS
SSSDocument
24 Number of structuredmeetings with employeesrepresentatives
Number ofmeetings
4 3 Nos - Excellent2 Nos - Very Good amp Good1 No - Averagelt No Meeting - Poor
Minutes ofthe Meeting
Total (E) 20
12 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
F HR Branding amp Excellence - Indicate achievement in this field for initiatives such as25 Benchmarking projects
undertaken in area of HRDetailsregarding theinitiatives to begiven alongwithachievements
10
Induction of the KRA based e-PMSsystem
E-PMSsystem itself
Total (F) 10Grand Total (A-F) 100
NB Total score out of 100 awarded on HRM to CPSE will be converted into score out of 5 in MoU on pro-rata basis() These parameters are applicable only on A amp B Category employees only() This parameter is for the group C and D category employee
Annexure-B
RampD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific RampD Plan and RampDBudget passed by its Board will automatically be rated as Poor in RampD ofMoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Table-1 Mandatory Parameter - Total RampD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Unit Weightage Performance Target Achievement
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 Total RampD
Expenditureas of PAT(Pleaserefer para38 (i) oftheGuideline)
25 05 ofPAT
045of PAT
04of
PAT
035of PAT
03of
PAT
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
14 | P a g e
Table-2 Projects chosen by CPSE
At the time of draft MoU Every year CPSEs shall submit RampD projects (Maharatna ampNavratna-Five projects Miniratna 0I amp II and other CPSEs below - Three projectsalongwith one most importantvitalkey performance Indicator to Task force at the time ofdraft MoU The Task Force will approve the same or add any other RampD projects alongwithperformance indicator(s)
At the time of MoU Evaluation The verification of achievement in respect of approvedperformance indicator(s) and evaluationrating of each RampD Project will be done byIndependent ExpertResearch Advisory Committee of CPSE Such evaluationrating will beconsidered accepted by Task Force during evaluation for allotting MoU score on RampD
Target Value
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10SlNo
ProjectsChosen
(Annex-I)
PerformanceIndicator
(Annex-II)
Wight-age
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor Actual
21 Admn Blockat MDURohtak
Development of softwareto monitortimelycompletionof projects ampFeedback onits efficacy
10 On amp beforescheduleddate ie310313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
22 ExaminationWing atMDURohtak
05 On amp beforescheduleddate ie150313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
23 Study onEconomisingof PrefabStructure
10 20032013 250313
280313
310313
After310313
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score on RampD 5
Total allotted score for both tables
ANNEXURE- CPROJECT IMPLEMENTATION TARGETS (MILE STONE MOU 2012-13)
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
MOU TARGETS FOR CSR PROJECTS ( MOU 2012-13)Annexure - D
(Rs Lacs)S
NoName of Project Unit Weigh-
tageTgtExp
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor DocumentaryEvidence forevaluation
1 Merit-cum-Means ScholarshipScheme (100 expendituresupport) preferably for girlstudents
RsLacs
1 300 500 400 300 200 100 MOU withLoombaFoundation ampExpenditureStatement
2 Conducting Skills andEntrepreneurship DevelopmentProgram through trainingpartners of National SkillDevelopment Corporation
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 MOU withAgency andExpenditureStatement
3 Repair of Schools ProvidingToilets in Schools
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 RA Bill
4 Providing 5 nos Ambulance Mobile Medical Units withrunning cost of mobileMedicare Unit (for three years)
RsLacs
1 7000 8470 7700 7000 6300 5670 Statement Bill
5 Construction of night shelters RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
6 Construction of Road side BusStand
RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
TOTAL 500 13300 16390 14700 13300 11300 9390
18 | P a g e
CALCULATION OF BUDGETED EXPENDITURE FOR CSRACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR 2012-13
(Rs in Cr)-- Profit After Tax (PAT) for the year 2009-10 116500
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 forthe year 2010-11
3495
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities forthe year 2010-11
1720
-- Amount carried forward for the next year ie 2011-12
1775 A
-- PAT for the year 2010-11 140340
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2011-12
4210 B
-- Total Budget for the year 2011-12 (A+B) 5985 C
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities for theyear 2011-12
2650
-- Amount to be carried forward for the next year ie2012-13
3335 D
-- PAT for the year 2011-12 135420
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2012-13
4063 E
-- Total Budget for the year 2012-13 (D+E) 7398 F
20 | P a g e
Annexure-E
SD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific SD Plan and SDBudget passed by its Board or its Designated Committee will automatically berated as Poor in SD of MoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Sl No Activity
1 Whether Specific SD Plan andBudget passed by Board or itsDesignated Committee
YesNo
No and Date of Board Resolution
1 2
Table-1 SD Committee details
Board LevelDesignatedCommittee Name
Chairman of BoardLevel DesignatedCommittee
Number ofRegular meetingsheld
Key decisionsduring the year
1 2 3 4
4 4
21 | P a g e
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-2 Total SD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Target Value as of PAT
Total Expenditure(Current FY)(Rs in Lacs)
Profit after tax(Previous FY)(Rs in Lacs)
ActualExpenditure as
of PAT
1 2 3 405 x 13542 - 13542 68
Total score for this Table 10
Score allotted by the Task Force
Note The projected annual expenditure as of the PAT for the performance yearwill be considered as target for the year
Table 3 Projects chosen by CPSE
SlNo
ScheduleAB
ProjectActivity
(Please referAnnex-I)
Performance Indicator(please refer Annex-II and Para 653 of
guidelines)
TotalExpenditure
onProjectActi
vity(Rs inLacs)
DurationSML
Target Set(On a five
pointscale
Para 663of
guidelines
TargetAchiev
ed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 A NIT
DurgapurRain waterharvesting
Project objectives -To gainfully use rainwater
EnvironmentCondition Indicator(ECI)- To rechargeground water
Rs 12 lac L 5
22 | P a g e
ManagementPerformance Indicator(MPI)-One trainingon rain waterharvesting
2 B Training Projects objectives- To increaseawareness Knowledge
MPI - Implementationof policy on SD
Rs 1 Lac S 5
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-4 - Evaluation of Projects
No of projects evaluated by an Independent External AgencyExpertConsultant etc
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
8 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
A2 Optional (Out of below five one is to be taken in the MOU) - 5 Marks5 of executives covered in
360 degree feedback systemagainst plan
X
Not Opted
6 of Senior level executives(HoDs amp GMs and above)covered in Assessment ampDevelopment Centre
X
Not Opted
7 Training interventions in new advanced technology - fulfilment of training plan innew technology
X
Not Opted
8 Interventions towardsIndustry - Academia Interface()
YesNoDetails
5
YES BIMTECH has been engaged forsupport in MDP programme4 Nos of programme- Excellent3 Nos of Programme - Very Good2 Nos of Programme- Good1 No of Programme- Average0 No of Programme- Poor
Copy ofMOU
9 fulfillmentof Plan forcarrying out CompetencyMapping of employees
X
Not Opted
Total (A1+A2) 25
9 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
B Performance Management10 To ensure implementation of
Bell Curve Approach in PMSrating ()
Yes NO 4 Yes RatingSummaryReport
11 Linkage of DevelopmentalPlan of Executives withPerformance ManagementSystem()
Yes NO 3 Yes TrainingCalander
12 Implementation of PRP linkedto PMS()
Yes NODetails 3 Yes Certificationby HR Head
Total (B) 10C Recruitment Retention amp Talent Management13 Manpower Rationalization
through Redeployment 5 30 - Excellent
25 - Very Good20 - Good15 - Averagelt15 -Poor
TranferOrder for re-deploymentand VRSScheme fromTime to Time
14 Attrition as of totalemployees ()
5 10 or below - Excellent20 - Very Good25 - Good30 - Averagegt30 - Poor
AttritionRegister
10 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
15 Presence of MentorshipDevelopment Programme -Nos of Mentors ampMentees()
YesNO Numbers
5 No Formulation of the Policy MentorPolicy
16 FormulationImplementationof systems for managementof Talent such as - Jobrotation system rewardsystem sponsoring srexecutives for AdvancedManagement Programmegrowth opportunities etc
Schemes Initiatives amptheir details
5 Formulation of the Policy Policy onManagementof Talent
Total (C) 20
D Enabling Creativity amp Innovation
17 Nos of Nominations entriessubmitted for National Awards(PM Shram Awards VishwakarmaRashtriya Puraskar)
Nos ofnominations
entries submittedfor national awards
5 1 No of Entry for the National Award Entries
18 Number of suggestions generatedper employee per year
Nos per employee 5 Formulation of the Policy Policy onsuggestionScheme
19 of Quality Circle projectscompleted against total Qualitycircle projects undertaken in ayear
fulfilment 5 Formulation of the policy on KAIZEN instead ofQuality Circle
Policy onKAIZEN
Total (D) 15
11 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
E Employee Relations amp Welfare
20 Effectiveness of GrievanceRedressal system - ofgrievances settled vis-agrave-visreceived during the year
settlement 4 70 - Excellent60 - Very Good50 - Good45 - Averagelt45 Poor
GrievanceRegister
21 Pension medicare Yogaclasses to reduce stresswhere the job is stressfulsetting up of wellness centresuch as Gym etc
4 120 -(gt 4 Programme)- Excellent100 - (gt3 Programme)- Very Good90 - (gt2 Programme) - Good85 - 1 programme)-Averagelt85 -No programme- Poor
TrainingComplitionSchedule
22 Employee satisfaction survey- ESI measure in
4 Formulation of the policy and designingof the Feedback System
ESS policy
23 Formulation ampImplementation of SocialSecurity Scheme
Yes No 4 Formulation and Documentation of theSSS
SSSDocument
24 Number of structuredmeetings with employeesrepresentatives
Number ofmeetings
4 3 Nos - Excellent2 Nos - Very Good amp Good1 No - Averagelt No Meeting - Poor
Minutes ofthe Meeting
Total (E) 20
12 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
F HR Branding amp Excellence - Indicate achievement in this field for initiatives such as25 Benchmarking projects
undertaken in area of HRDetailsregarding theinitiatives to begiven alongwithachievements
10
Induction of the KRA based e-PMSsystem
E-PMSsystem itself
Total (F) 10Grand Total (A-F) 100
NB Total score out of 100 awarded on HRM to CPSE will be converted into score out of 5 in MoU on pro-rata basis() These parameters are applicable only on A amp B Category employees only() This parameter is for the group C and D category employee
Annexure-B
RampD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific RampD Plan and RampDBudget passed by its Board will automatically be rated as Poor in RampD ofMoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Table-1 Mandatory Parameter - Total RampD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Unit Weightage Performance Target Achievement
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 Total RampD
Expenditureas of PAT(Pleaserefer para38 (i) oftheGuideline)
25 05 ofPAT
045of PAT
04of
PAT
035of PAT
03of
PAT
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
14 | P a g e
Table-2 Projects chosen by CPSE
At the time of draft MoU Every year CPSEs shall submit RampD projects (Maharatna ampNavratna-Five projects Miniratna 0I amp II and other CPSEs below - Three projectsalongwith one most importantvitalkey performance Indicator to Task force at the time ofdraft MoU The Task Force will approve the same or add any other RampD projects alongwithperformance indicator(s)
At the time of MoU Evaluation The verification of achievement in respect of approvedperformance indicator(s) and evaluationrating of each RampD Project will be done byIndependent ExpertResearch Advisory Committee of CPSE Such evaluationrating will beconsidered accepted by Task Force during evaluation for allotting MoU score on RampD
Target Value
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10SlNo
ProjectsChosen
(Annex-I)
PerformanceIndicator
(Annex-II)
Wight-age
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor Actual
21 Admn Blockat MDURohtak
Development of softwareto monitortimelycompletionof projects ampFeedback onits efficacy
10 On amp beforescheduleddate ie310313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
22 ExaminationWing atMDURohtak
05 On amp beforescheduleddate ie150313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
23 Study onEconomisingof PrefabStructure
10 20032013 250313
280313
310313
After310313
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score on RampD 5
Total allotted score for both tables
ANNEXURE- CPROJECT IMPLEMENTATION TARGETS (MILE STONE MOU 2012-13)
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
MOU TARGETS FOR CSR PROJECTS ( MOU 2012-13)Annexure - D
(Rs Lacs)S
NoName of Project Unit Weigh-
tageTgtExp
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor DocumentaryEvidence forevaluation
1 Merit-cum-Means ScholarshipScheme (100 expendituresupport) preferably for girlstudents
RsLacs
1 300 500 400 300 200 100 MOU withLoombaFoundation ampExpenditureStatement
2 Conducting Skills andEntrepreneurship DevelopmentProgram through trainingpartners of National SkillDevelopment Corporation
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 MOU withAgency andExpenditureStatement
3 Repair of Schools ProvidingToilets in Schools
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 RA Bill
4 Providing 5 nos Ambulance Mobile Medical Units withrunning cost of mobileMedicare Unit (for three years)
RsLacs
1 7000 8470 7700 7000 6300 5670 Statement Bill
5 Construction of night shelters RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
6 Construction of Road side BusStand
RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
TOTAL 500 13300 16390 14700 13300 11300 9390
18 | P a g e
CALCULATION OF BUDGETED EXPENDITURE FOR CSRACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR 2012-13
(Rs in Cr)-- Profit After Tax (PAT) for the year 2009-10 116500
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 forthe year 2010-11
3495
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities forthe year 2010-11
1720
-- Amount carried forward for the next year ie 2011-12
1775 A
-- PAT for the year 2010-11 140340
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2011-12
4210 B
-- Total Budget for the year 2011-12 (A+B) 5985 C
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities for theyear 2011-12
2650
-- Amount to be carried forward for the next year ie2012-13
3335 D
-- PAT for the year 2011-12 135420
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2012-13
4063 E
-- Total Budget for the year 2012-13 (D+E) 7398 F
20 | P a g e
Annexure-E
SD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific SD Plan and SDBudget passed by its Board or its Designated Committee will automatically berated as Poor in SD of MoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Sl No Activity
1 Whether Specific SD Plan andBudget passed by Board or itsDesignated Committee
YesNo
No and Date of Board Resolution
1 2
Table-1 SD Committee details
Board LevelDesignatedCommittee Name
Chairman of BoardLevel DesignatedCommittee
Number ofRegular meetingsheld
Key decisionsduring the year
1 2 3 4
4 4
21 | P a g e
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-2 Total SD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Target Value as of PAT
Total Expenditure(Current FY)(Rs in Lacs)
Profit after tax(Previous FY)(Rs in Lacs)
ActualExpenditure as
of PAT
1 2 3 405 x 13542 - 13542 68
Total score for this Table 10
Score allotted by the Task Force
Note The projected annual expenditure as of the PAT for the performance yearwill be considered as target for the year
Table 3 Projects chosen by CPSE
SlNo
ScheduleAB
ProjectActivity
(Please referAnnex-I)
Performance Indicator(please refer Annex-II and Para 653 of
guidelines)
TotalExpenditure
onProjectActi
vity(Rs inLacs)
DurationSML
Target Set(On a five
pointscale
Para 663of
guidelines
TargetAchiev
ed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 A NIT
DurgapurRain waterharvesting
Project objectives -To gainfully use rainwater
EnvironmentCondition Indicator(ECI)- To rechargeground water
Rs 12 lac L 5
22 | P a g e
ManagementPerformance Indicator(MPI)-One trainingon rain waterharvesting
2 B Training Projects objectives- To increaseawareness Knowledge
MPI - Implementationof policy on SD
Rs 1 Lac S 5
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-4 - Evaluation of Projects
No of projects evaluated by an Independent External AgencyExpertConsultant etc
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
9 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
B Performance Management10 To ensure implementation of
Bell Curve Approach in PMSrating ()
Yes NO 4 Yes RatingSummaryReport
11 Linkage of DevelopmentalPlan of Executives withPerformance ManagementSystem()
Yes NO 3 Yes TrainingCalander
12 Implementation of PRP linkedto PMS()
Yes NODetails 3 Yes Certificationby HR Head
Total (B) 10C Recruitment Retention amp Talent Management13 Manpower Rationalization
through Redeployment 5 30 - Excellent
25 - Very Good20 - Good15 - Averagelt15 -Poor
TranferOrder for re-deploymentand VRSScheme fromTime to Time
14 Attrition as of totalemployees ()
5 10 or below - Excellent20 - Very Good25 - Good30 - Averagegt30 - Poor
AttritionRegister
10 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
15 Presence of MentorshipDevelopment Programme -Nos of Mentors ampMentees()
YesNO Numbers
5 No Formulation of the Policy MentorPolicy
16 FormulationImplementationof systems for managementof Talent such as - Jobrotation system rewardsystem sponsoring srexecutives for AdvancedManagement Programmegrowth opportunities etc
Schemes Initiatives amptheir details
5 Formulation of the Policy Policy onManagementof Talent
Total (C) 20
D Enabling Creativity amp Innovation
17 Nos of Nominations entriessubmitted for National Awards(PM Shram Awards VishwakarmaRashtriya Puraskar)
Nos ofnominations
entries submittedfor national awards
5 1 No of Entry for the National Award Entries
18 Number of suggestions generatedper employee per year
Nos per employee 5 Formulation of the Policy Policy onsuggestionScheme
19 of Quality Circle projectscompleted against total Qualitycircle projects undertaken in ayear
fulfilment 5 Formulation of the policy on KAIZEN instead ofQuality Circle
Policy onKAIZEN
Total (D) 15
11 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
E Employee Relations amp Welfare
20 Effectiveness of GrievanceRedressal system - ofgrievances settled vis-agrave-visreceived during the year
settlement 4 70 - Excellent60 - Very Good50 - Good45 - Averagelt45 Poor
GrievanceRegister
21 Pension medicare Yogaclasses to reduce stresswhere the job is stressfulsetting up of wellness centresuch as Gym etc
4 120 -(gt 4 Programme)- Excellent100 - (gt3 Programme)- Very Good90 - (gt2 Programme) - Good85 - 1 programme)-Averagelt85 -No programme- Poor
TrainingComplitionSchedule
22 Employee satisfaction survey- ESI measure in
4 Formulation of the policy and designingof the Feedback System
ESS policy
23 Formulation ampImplementation of SocialSecurity Scheme
Yes No 4 Formulation and Documentation of theSSS
SSSDocument
24 Number of structuredmeetings with employeesrepresentatives
Number ofmeetings
4 3 Nos - Excellent2 Nos - Very Good amp Good1 No - Averagelt No Meeting - Poor
Minutes ofthe Meeting
Total (E) 20
12 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
F HR Branding amp Excellence - Indicate achievement in this field for initiatives such as25 Benchmarking projects
undertaken in area of HRDetailsregarding theinitiatives to begiven alongwithachievements
10
Induction of the KRA based e-PMSsystem
E-PMSsystem itself
Total (F) 10Grand Total (A-F) 100
NB Total score out of 100 awarded on HRM to CPSE will be converted into score out of 5 in MoU on pro-rata basis() These parameters are applicable only on A amp B Category employees only() This parameter is for the group C and D category employee
Annexure-B
RampD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific RampD Plan and RampDBudget passed by its Board will automatically be rated as Poor in RampD ofMoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Table-1 Mandatory Parameter - Total RampD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Unit Weightage Performance Target Achievement
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 Total RampD
Expenditureas of PAT(Pleaserefer para38 (i) oftheGuideline)
25 05 ofPAT
045of PAT
04of
PAT
035of PAT
03of
PAT
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
14 | P a g e
Table-2 Projects chosen by CPSE
At the time of draft MoU Every year CPSEs shall submit RampD projects (Maharatna ampNavratna-Five projects Miniratna 0I amp II and other CPSEs below - Three projectsalongwith one most importantvitalkey performance Indicator to Task force at the time ofdraft MoU The Task Force will approve the same or add any other RampD projects alongwithperformance indicator(s)
At the time of MoU Evaluation The verification of achievement in respect of approvedperformance indicator(s) and evaluationrating of each RampD Project will be done byIndependent ExpertResearch Advisory Committee of CPSE Such evaluationrating will beconsidered accepted by Task Force during evaluation for allotting MoU score on RampD
Target Value
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10SlNo
ProjectsChosen
(Annex-I)
PerformanceIndicator
(Annex-II)
Wight-age
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor Actual
21 Admn Blockat MDURohtak
Development of softwareto monitortimelycompletionof projects ampFeedback onits efficacy
10 On amp beforescheduleddate ie310313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
22 ExaminationWing atMDURohtak
05 On amp beforescheduleddate ie150313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
23 Study onEconomisingof PrefabStructure
10 20032013 250313
280313
310313
After310313
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score on RampD 5
Total allotted score for both tables
ANNEXURE- CPROJECT IMPLEMENTATION TARGETS (MILE STONE MOU 2012-13)
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
MOU TARGETS FOR CSR PROJECTS ( MOU 2012-13)Annexure - D
(Rs Lacs)S
NoName of Project Unit Weigh-
tageTgtExp
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor DocumentaryEvidence forevaluation
1 Merit-cum-Means ScholarshipScheme (100 expendituresupport) preferably for girlstudents
RsLacs
1 300 500 400 300 200 100 MOU withLoombaFoundation ampExpenditureStatement
2 Conducting Skills andEntrepreneurship DevelopmentProgram through trainingpartners of National SkillDevelopment Corporation
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 MOU withAgency andExpenditureStatement
3 Repair of Schools ProvidingToilets in Schools
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 RA Bill
4 Providing 5 nos Ambulance Mobile Medical Units withrunning cost of mobileMedicare Unit (for three years)
RsLacs
1 7000 8470 7700 7000 6300 5670 Statement Bill
5 Construction of night shelters RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
6 Construction of Road side BusStand
RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
TOTAL 500 13300 16390 14700 13300 11300 9390
18 | P a g e
CALCULATION OF BUDGETED EXPENDITURE FOR CSRACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR 2012-13
(Rs in Cr)-- Profit After Tax (PAT) for the year 2009-10 116500
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 forthe year 2010-11
3495
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities forthe year 2010-11
1720
-- Amount carried forward for the next year ie 2011-12
1775 A
-- PAT for the year 2010-11 140340
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2011-12
4210 B
-- Total Budget for the year 2011-12 (A+B) 5985 C
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities for theyear 2011-12
2650
-- Amount to be carried forward for the next year ie2012-13
3335 D
-- PAT for the year 2011-12 135420
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2012-13
4063 E
-- Total Budget for the year 2012-13 (D+E) 7398 F
20 | P a g e
Annexure-E
SD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific SD Plan and SDBudget passed by its Board or its Designated Committee will automatically berated as Poor in SD of MoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Sl No Activity
1 Whether Specific SD Plan andBudget passed by Board or itsDesignated Committee
YesNo
No and Date of Board Resolution
1 2
Table-1 SD Committee details
Board LevelDesignatedCommittee Name
Chairman of BoardLevel DesignatedCommittee
Number ofRegular meetingsheld
Key decisionsduring the year
1 2 3 4
4 4
21 | P a g e
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-2 Total SD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Target Value as of PAT
Total Expenditure(Current FY)(Rs in Lacs)
Profit after tax(Previous FY)(Rs in Lacs)
ActualExpenditure as
of PAT
1 2 3 405 x 13542 - 13542 68
Total score for this Table 10
Score allotted by the Task Force
Note The projected annual expenditure as of the PAT for the performance yearwill be considered as target for the year
Table 3 Projects chosen by CPSE
SlNo
ScheduleAB
ProjectActivity
(Please referAnnex-I)
Performance Indicator(please refer Annex-II and Para 653 of
guidelines)
TotalExpenditure
onProjectActi
vity(Rs inLacs)
DurationSML
Target Set(On a five
pointscale
Para 663of
guidelines
TargetAchiev
ed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 A NIT
DurgapurRain waterharvesting
Project objectives -To gainfully use rainwater
EnvironmentCondition Indicator(ECI)- To rechargeground water
Rs 12 lac L 5
22 | P a g e
ManagementPerformance Indicator(MPI)-One trainingon rain waterharvesting
2 B Training Projects objectives- To increaseawareness Knowledge
MPI - Implementationof policy on SD
Rs 1 Lac S 5
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-4 - Evaluation of Projects
No of projects evaluated by an Independent External AgencyExpertConsultant etc
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
10 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
15 Presence of MentorshipDevelopment Programme -Nos of Mentors ampMentees()
YesNO Numbers
5 No Formulation of the Policy MentorPolicy
16 FormulationImplementationof systems for managementof Talent such as - Jobrotation system rewardsystem sponsoring srexecutives for AdvancedManagement Programmegrowth opportunities etc
Schemes Initiatives amptheir details
5 Formulation of the Policy Policy onManagementof Talent
Total (C) 20
D Enabling Creativity amp Innovation
17 Nos of Nominations entriessubmitted for National Awards(PM Shram Awards VishwakarmaRashtriya Puraskar)
Nos ofnominations
entries submittedfor national awards
5 1 No of Entry for the National Award Entries
18 Number of suggestions generatedper employee per year
Nos per employee 5 Formulation of the Policy Policy onsuggestionScheme
19 of Quality Circle projectscompleted against total Qualitycircle projects undertaken in ayear
fulfilment 5 Formulation of the policy on KAIZEN instead ofQuality Circle
Policy onKAIZEN
Total (D) 15
11 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
E Employee Relations amp Welfare
20 Effectiveness of GrievanceRedressal system - ofgrievances settled vis-agrave-visreceived during the year
settlement 4 70 - Excellent60 - Very Good50 - Good45 - Averagelt45 Poor
GrievanceRegister
21 Pension medicare Yogaclasses to reduce stresswhere the job is stressfulsetting up of wellness centresuch as Gym etc
4 120 -(gt 4 Programme)- Excellent100 - (gt3 Programme)- Very Good90 - (gt2 Programme) - Good85 - 1 programme)-Averagelt85 -No programme- Poor
TrainingComplitionSchedule
22 Employee satisfaction survey- ESI measure in
4 Formulation of the policy and designingof the Feedback System
ESS policy
23 Formulation ampImplementation of SocialSecurity Scheme
Yes No 4 Formulation and Documentation of theSSS
SSSDocument
24 Number of structuredmeetings with employeesrepresentatives
Number ofmeetings
4 3 Nos - Excellent2 Nos - Very Good amp Good1 No - Averagelt No Meeting - Poor
Minutes ofthe Meeting
Total (E) 20
12 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
F HR Branding amp Excellence - Indicate achievement in this field for initiatives such as25 Benchmarking projects
undertaken in area of HRDetailsregarding theinitiatives to begiven alongwithachievements
10
Induction of the KRA based e-PMSsystem
E-PMSsystem itself
Total (F) 10Grand Total (A-F) 100
NB Total score out of 100 awarded on HRM to CPSE will be converted into score out of 5 in MoU on pro-rata basis() These parameters are applicable only on A amp B Category employees only() This parameter is for the group C and D category employee
Annexure-B
RampD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific RampD Plan and RampDBudget passed by its Board will automatically be rated as Poor in RampD ofMoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Table-1 Mandatory Parameter - Total RampD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Unit Weightage Performance Target Achievement
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 Total RampD
Expenditureas of PAT(Pleaserefer para38 (i) oftheGuideline)
25 05 ofPAT
045of PAT
04of
PAT
035of PAT
03of
PAT
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
14 | P a g e
Table-2 Projects chosen by CPSE
At the time of draft MoU Every year CPSEs shall submit RampD projects (Maharatna ampNavratna-Five projects Miniratna 0I amp II and other CPSEs below - Three projectsalongwith one most importantvitalkey performance Indicator to Task force at the time ofdraft MoU The Task Force will approve the same or add any other RampD projects alongwithperformance indicator(s)
At the time of MoU Evaluation The verification of achievement in respect of approvedperformance indicator(s) and evaluationrating of each RampD Project will be done byIndependent ExpertResearch Advisory Committee of CPSE Such evaluationrating will beconsidered accepted by Task Force during evaluation for allotting MoU score on RampD
Target Value
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10SlNo
ProjectsChosen
(Annex-I)
PerformanceIndicator
(Annex-II)
Wight-age
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor Actual
21 Admn Blockat MDURohtak
Development of softwareto monitortimelycompletionof projects ampFeedback onits efficacy
10 On amp beforescheduleddate ie310313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
22 ExaminationWing atMDURohtak
05 On amp beforescheduleddate ie150313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
23 Study onEconomisingof PrefabStructure
10 20032013 250313
280313
310313
After310313
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score on RampD 5
Total allotted score for both tables
ANNEXURE- CPROJECT IMPLEMENTATION TARGETS (MILE STONE MOU 2012-13)
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
MOU TARGETS FOR CSR PROJECTS ( MOU 2012-13)Annexure - D
(Rs Lacs)S
NoName of Project Unit Weigh-
tageTgtExp
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor DocumentaryEvidence forevaluation
1 Merit-cum-Means ScholarshipScheme (100 expendituresupport) preferably for girlstudents
RsLacs
1 300 500 400 300 200 100 MOU withLoombaFoundation ampExpenditureStatement
2 Conducting Skills andEntrepreneurship DevelopmentProgram through trainingpartners of National SkillDevelopment Corporation
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 MOU withAgency andExpenditureStatement
3 Repair of Schools ProvidingToilets in Schools
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 RA Bill
4 Providing 5 nos Ambulance Mobile Medical Units withrunning cost of mobileMedicare Unit (for three years)
RsLacs
1 7000 8470 7700 7000 6300 5670 Statement Bill
5 Construction of night shelters RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
6 Construction of Road side BusStand
RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
TOTAL 500 13300 16390 14700 13300 11300 9390
18 | P a g e
CALCULATION OF BUDGETED EXPENDITURE FOR CSRACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR 2012-13
(Rs in Cr)-- Profit After Tax (PAT) for the year 2009-10 116500
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 forthe year 2010-11
3495
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities forthe year 2010-11
1720
-- Amount carried forward for the next year ie 2011-12
1775 A
-- PAT for the year 2010-11 140340
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2011-12
4210 B
-- Total Budget for the year 2011-12 (A+B) 5985 C
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities for theyear 2011-12
2650
-- Amount to be carried forward for the next year ie2012-13
3335 D
-- PAT for the year 2011-12 135420
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2012-13
4063 E
-- Total Budget for the year 2012-13 (D+E) 7398 F
20 | P a g e
Annexure-E
SD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific SD Plan and SDBudget passed by its Board or its Designated Committee will automatically berated as Poor in SD of MoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Sl No Activity
1 Whether Specific SD Plan andBudget passed by Board or itsDesignated Committee
YesNo
No and Date of Board Resolution
1 2
Table-1 SD Committee details
Board LevelDesignatedCommittee Name
Chairman of BoardLevel DesignatedCommittee
Number ofRegular meetingsheld
Key decisionsduring the year
1 2 3 4
4 4
21 | P a g e
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-2 Total SD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Target Value as of PAT
Total Expenditure(Current FY)(Rs in Lacs)
Profit after tax(Previous FY)(Rs in Lacs)
ActualExpenditure as
of PAT
1 2 3 405 x 13542 - 13542 68
Total score for this Table 10
Score allotted by the Task Force
Note The projected annual expenditure as of the PAT for the performance yearwill be considered as target for the year
Table 3 Projects chosen by CPSE
SlNo
ScheduleAB
ProjectActivity
(Please referAnnex-I)
Performance Indicator(please refer Annex-II and Para 653 of
guidelines)
TotalExpenditure
onProjectActi
vity(Rs inLacs)
DurationSML
Target Set(On a five
pointscale
Para 663of
guidelines
TargetAchiev
ed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 A NIT
DurgapurRain waterharvesting
Project objectives -To gainfully use rainwater
EnvironmentCondition Indicator(ECI)- To rechargeground water
Rs 12 lac L 5
22 | P a g e
ManagementPerformance Indicator(MPI)-One trainingon rain waterharvesting
2 B Training Projects objectives- To increaseawareness Knowledge
MPI - Implementationof policy on SD
Rs 1 Lac S 5
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-4 - Evaluation of Projects
No of projects evaluated by an Independent External AgencyExpertConsultant etc
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
11 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
E Employee Relations amp Welfare
20 Effectiveness of GrievanceRedressal system - ofgrievances settled vis-agrave-visreceived during the year
settlement 4 70 - Excellent60 - Very Good50 - Good45 - Averagelt45 Poor
GrievanceRegister
21 Pension medicare Yogaclasses to reduce stresswhere the job is stressfulsetting up of wellness centresuch as Gym etc
4 120 -(gt 4 Programme)- Excellent100 - (gt3 Programme)- Very Good90 - (gt2 Programme) - Good85 - 1 programme)-Averagelt85 -No programme- Poor
TrainingComplitionSchedule
22 Employee satisfaction survey- ESI measure in
4 Formulation of the policy and designingof the Feedback System
ESS policy
23 Formulation ampImplementation of SocialSecurity Scheme
Yes No 4 Formulation and Documentation of theSSS
SSSDocument
24 Number of structuredmeetings with employeesrepresentatives
Number ofmeetings
4 3 Nos - Excellent2 Nos - Very Good amp Good1 No - Averagelt No Meeting - Poor
Minutes ofthe Meeting
Total (E) 20
12 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
F HR Branding amp Excellence - Indicate achievement in this field for initiatives such as25 Benchmarking projects
undertaken in area of HRDetailsregarding theinitiatives to begiven alongwithachievements
10
Induction of the KRA based e-PMSsystem
E-PMSsystem itself
Total (F) 10Grand Total (A-F) 100
NB Total score out of 100 awarded on HRM to CPSE will be converted into score out of 5 in MoU on pro-rata basis() These parameters are applicable only on A amp B Category employees only() This parameter is for the group C and D category employee
Annexure-B
RampD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific RampD Plan and RampDBudget passed by its Board will automatically be rated as Poor in RampD ofMoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Table-1 Mandatory Parameter - Total RampD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Unit Weightage Performance Target Achievement
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 Total RampD
Expenditureas of PAT(Pleaserefer para38 (i) oftheGuideline)
25 05 ofPAT
045of PAT
04of
PAT
035of PAT
03of
PAT
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
14 | P a g e
Table-2 Projects chosen by CPSE
At the time of draft MoU Every year CPSEs shall submit RampD projects (Maharatna ampNavratna-Five projects Miniratna 0I amp II and other CPSEs below - Three projectsalongwith one most importantvitalkey performance Indicator to Task force at the time ofdraft MoU The Task Force will approve the same or add any other RampD projects alongwithperformance indicator(s)
At the time of MoU Evaluation The verification of achievement in respect of approvedperformance indicator(s) and evaluationrating of each RampD Project will be done byIndependent ExpertResearch Advisory Committee of CPSE Such evaluationrating will beconsidered accepted by Task Force during evaluation for allotting MoU score on RampD
Target Value
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10SlNo
ProjectsChosen
(Annex-I)
PerformanceIndicator
(Annex-II)
Wight-age
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor Actual
21 Admn Blockat MDURohtak
Development of softwareto monitortimelycompletionof projects ampFeedback onits efficacy
10 On amp beforescheduleddate ie310313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
22 ExaminationWing atMDURohtak
05 On amp beforescheduleddate ie150313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
23 Study onEconomisingof PrefabStructure
10 20032013 250313
280313
310313
After310313
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score on RampD 5
Total allotted score for both tables
ANNEXURE- CPROJECT IMPLEMENTATION TARGETS (MILE STONE MOU 2012-13)
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
MOU TARGETS FOR CSR PROJECTS ( MOU 2012-13)Annexure - D
(Rs Lacs)S
NoName of Project Unit Weigh-
tageTgtExp
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor DocumentaryEvidence forevaluation
1 Merit-cum-Means ScholarshipScheme (100 expendituresupport) preferably for girlstudents
RsLacs
1 300 500 400 300 200 100 MOU withLoombaFoundation ampExpenditureStatement
2 Conducting Skills andEntrepreneurship DevelopmentProgram through trainingpartners of National SkillDevelopment Corporation
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 MOU withAgency andExpenditureStatement
3 Repair of Schools ProvidingToilets in Schools
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 RA Bill
4 Providing 5 nos Ambulance Mobile Medical Units withrunning cost of mobileMedicare Unit (for three years)
RsLacs
1 7000 8470 7700 7000 6300 5670 Statement Bill
5 Construction of night shelters RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
6 Construction of Road side BusStand
RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
TOTAL 500 13300 16390 14700 13300 11300 9390
18 | P a g e
CALCULATION OF BUDGETED EXPENDITURE FOR CSRACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR 2012-13
(Rs in Cr)-- Profit After Tax (PAT) for the year 2009-10 116500
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 forthe year 2010-11
3495
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities forthe year 2010-11
1720
-- Amount carried forward for the next year ie 2011-12
1775 A
-- PAT for the year 2010-11 140340
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2011-12
4210 B
-- Total Budget for the year 2011-12 (A+B) 5985 C
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities for theyear 2011-12
2650
-- Amount to be carried forward for the next year ie2012-13
3335 D
-- PAT for the year 2011-12 135420
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2012-13
4063 E
-- Total Budget for the year 2012-13 (D+E) 7398 F
20 | P a g e
Annexure-E
SD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific SD Plan and SDBudget passed by its Board or its Designated Committee will automatically berated as Poor in SD of MoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Sl No Activity
1 Whether Specific SD Plan andBudget passed by Board or itsDesignated Committee
YesNo
No and Date of Board Resolution
1 2
Table-1 SD Committee details
Board LevelDesignatedCommittee Name
Chairman of BoardLevel DesignatedCommittee
Number ofRegular meetingsheld
Key decisionsduring the year
1 2 3 4
4 4
21 | P a g e
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-2 Total SD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Target Value as of PAT
Total Expenditure(Current FY)(Rs in Lacs)
Profit after tax(Previous FY)(Rs in Lacs)
ActualExpenditure as
of PAT
1 2 3 405 x 13542 - 13542 68
Total score for this Table 10
Score allotted by the Task Force
Note The projected annual expenditure as of the PAT for the performance yearwill be considered as target for the year
Table 3 Projects chosen by CPSE
SlNo
ScheduleAB
ProjectActivity
(Please referAnnex-I)
Performance Indicator(please refer Annex-II and Para 653 of
guidelines)
TotalExpenditure
onProjectActi
vity(Rs inLacs)
DurationSML
Target Set(On a five
pointscale
Para 663of
guidelines
TargetAchiev
ed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 A NIT
DurgapurRain waterharvesting
Project objectives -To gainfully use rainwater
EnvironmentCondition Indicator(ECI)- To rechargeground water
Rs 12 lac L 5
22 | P a g e
ManagementPerformance Indicator(MPI)-One trainingon rain waterharvesting
2 B Training Projects objectives- To increaseawareness Knowledge
MPI - Implementationof policy on SD
Rs 1 Lac S 5
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-4 - Evaluation of Projects
No of projects evaluated by an Independent External AgencyExpertConsultant etc
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
12 | P a g e
SlNo
HRM - PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Measurement Unit Weightage
Target value under five point scale - BasicTarget (GoodVery Good)-To be filled at the time of submission of draftMoU by CPSE
VerificationDocument
F HR Branding amp Excellence - Indicate achievement in this field for initiatives such as25 Benchmarking projects
undertaken in area of HRDetailsregarding theinitiatives to begiven alongwithachievements
10
Induction of the KRA based e-PMSsystem
E-PMSsystem itself
Total (F) 10Grand Total (A-F) 100
NB Total score out of 100 awarded on HRM to CPSE will be converted into score out of 5 in MoU on pro-rata basis() These parameters are applicable only on A amp B Category employees only() This parameter is for the group C and D category employee
Annexure-B
RampD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific RampD Plan and RampDBudget passed by its Board will automatically be rated as Poor in RampD ofMoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Table-1 Mandatory Parameter - Total RampD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Unit Weightage Performance Target Achievement
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 Total RampD
Expenditureas of PAT(Pleaserefer para38 (i) oftheGuideline)
25 05 ofPAT
045of PAT
04of
PAT
035of PAT
03of
PAT
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
14 | P a g e
Table-2 Projects chosen by CPSE
At the time of draft MoU Every year CPSEs shall submit RampD projects (Maharatna ampNavratna-Five projects Miniratna 0I amp II and other CPSEs below - Three projectsalongwith one most importantvitalkey performance Indicator to Task force at the time ofdraft MoU The Task Force will approve the same or add any other RampD projects alongwithperformance indicator(s)
At the time of MoU Evaluation The verification of achievement in respect of approvedperformance indicator(s) and evaluationrating of each RampD Project will be done byIndependent ExpertResearch Advisory Committee of CPSE Such evaluationrating will beconsidered accepted by Task Force during evaluation for allotting MoU score on RampD
Target Value
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10SlNo
ProjectsChosen
(Annex-I)
PerformanceIndicator
(Annex-II)
Wight-age
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor Actual
21 Admn Blockat MDURohtak
Development of softwareto monitortimelycompletionof projects ampFeedback onits efficacy
10 On amp beforescheduleddate ie310313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
22 ExaminationWing atMDURohtak
05 On amp beforescheduleddate ie150313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
23 Study onEconomisingof PrefabStructure
10 20032013 250313
280313
310313
After310313
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score on RampD 5
Total allotted score for both tables
ANNEXURE- CPROJECT IMPLEMENTATION TARGETS (MILE STONE MOU 2012-13)
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
MOU TARGETS FOR CSR PROJECTS ( MOU 2012-13)Annexure - D
(Rs Lacs)S
NoName of Project Unit Weigh-
tageTgtExp
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor DocumentaryEvidence forevaluation
1 Merit-cum-Means ScholarshipScheme (100 expendituresupport) preferably for girlstudents
RsLacs
1 300 500 400 300 200 100 MOU withLoombaFoundation ampExpenditureStatement
2 Conducting Skills andEntrepreneurship DevelopmentProgram through trainingpartners of National SkillDevelopment Corporation
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 MOU withAgency andExpenditureStatement
3 Repair of Schools ProvidingToilets in Schools
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 RA Bill
4 Providing 5 nos Ambulance Mobile Medical Units withrunning cost of mobileMedicare Unit (for three years)
RsLacs
1 7000 8470 7700 7000 6300 5670 Statement Bill
5 Construction of night shelters RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
6 Construction of Road side BusStand
RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
TOTAL 500 13300 16390 14700 13300 11300 9390
18 | P a g e
CALCULATION OF BUDGETED EXPENDITURE FOR CSRACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR 2012-13
(Rs in Cr)-- Profit After Tax (PAT) for the year 2009-10 116500
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 forthe year 2010-11
3495
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities forthe year 2010-11
1720
-- Amount carried forward for the next year ie 2011-12
1775 A
-- PAT for the year 2010-11 140340
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2011-12
4210 B
-- Total Budget for the year 2011-12 (A+B) 5985 C
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities for theyear 2011-12
2650
-- Amount to be carried forward for the next year ie2012-13
3335 D
-- PAT for the year 2011-12 135420
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2012-13
4063 E
-- Total Budget for the year 2012-13 (D+E) 7398 F
20 | P a g e
Annexure-E
SD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific SD Plan and SDBudget passed by its Board or its Designated Committee will automatically berated as Poor in SD of MoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Sl No Activity
1 Whether Specific SD Plan andBudget passed by Board or itsDesignated Committee
YesNo
No and Date of Board Resolution
1 2
Table-1 SD Committee details
Board LevelDesignatedCommittee Name
Chairman of BoardLevel DesignatedCommittee
Number ofRegular meetingsheld
Key decisionsduring the year
1 2 3 4
4 4
21 | P a g e
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-2 Total SD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Target Value as of PAT
Total Expenditure(Current FY)(Rs in Lacs)
Profit after tax(Previous FY)(Rs in Lacs)
ActualExpenditure as
of PAT
1 2 3 405 x 13542 - 13542 68
Total score for this Table 10
Score allotted by the Task Force
Note The projected annual expenditure as of the PAT for the performance yearwill be considered as target for the year
Table 3 Projects chosen by CPSE
SlNo
ScheduleAB
ProjectActivity
(Please referAnnex-I)
Performance Indicator(please refer Annex-II and Para 653 of
guidelines)
TotalExpenditure
onProjectActi
vity(Rs inLacs)
DurationSML
Target Set(On a five
pointscale
Para 663of
guidelines
TargetAchiev
ed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 A NIT
DurgapurRain waterharvesting
Project objectives -To gainfully use rainwater
EnvironmentCondition Indicator(ECI)- To rechargeground water
Rs 12 lac L 5
22 | P a g e
ManagementPerformance Indicator(MPI)-One trainingon rain waterharvesting
2 B Training Projects objectives- To increaseawareness Knowledge
MPI - Implementationof policy on SD
Rs 1 Lac S 5
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-4 - Evaluation of Projects
No of projects evaluated by an Independent External AgencyExpertConsultant etc
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
Annexure-B
RampD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific RampD Plan and RampDBudget passed by its Board will automatically be rated as Poor in RampD ofMoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Table-1 Mandatory Parameter - Total RampD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Unit Weightage Performance Target Achievement
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 Total RampD
Expenditureas of PAT(Pleaserefer para38 (i) oftheGuideline)
25 05 ofPAT
045of PAT
04of
PAT
035of PAT
03of
PAT
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
14 | P a g e
Table-2 Projects chosen by CPSE
At the time of draft MoU Every year CPSEs shall submit RampD projects (Maharatna ampNavratna-Five projects Miniratna 0I amp II and other CPSEs below - Three projectsalongwith one most importantvitalkey performance Indicator to Task force at the time ofdraft MoU The Task Force will approve the same or add any other RampD projects alongwithperformance indicator(s)
At the time of MoU Evaluation The verification of achievement in respect of approvedperformance indicator(s) and evaluationrating of each RampD Project will be done byIndependent ExpertResearch Advisory Committee of CPSE Such evaluationrating will beconsidered accepted by Task Force during evaluation for allotting MoU score on RampD
Target Value
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10SlNo
ProjectsChosen
(Annex-I)
PerformanceIndicator
(Annex-II)
Wight-age
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor Actual
21 Admn Blockat MDURohtak
Development of softwareto monitortimelycompletionof projects ampFeedback onits efficacy
10 On amp beforescheduleddate ie310313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
22 ExaminationWing atMDURohtak
05 On amp beforescheduleddate ie150313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
23 Study onEconomisingof PrefabStructure
10 20032013 250313
280313
310313
After310313
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score on RampD 5
Total allotted score for both tables
ANNEXURE- CPROJECT IMPLEMENTATION TARGETS (MILE STONE MOU 2012-13)
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
MOU TARGETS FOR CSR PROJECTS ( MOU 2012-13)Annexure - D
(Rs Lacs)S
NoName of Project Unit Weigh-
tageTgtExp
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor DocumentaryEvidence forevaluation
1 Merit-cum-Means ScholarshipScheme (100 expendituresupport) preferably for girlstudents
RsLacs
1 300 500 400 300 200 100 MOU withLoombaFoundation ampExpenditureStatement
2 Conducting Skills andEntrepreneurship DevelopmentProgram through trainingpartners of National SkillDevelopment Corporation
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 MOU withAgency andExpenditureStatement
3 Repair of Schools ProvidingToilets in Schools
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 RA Bill
4 Providing 5 nos Ambulance Mobile Medical Units withrunning cost of mobileMedicare Unit (for three years)
RsLacs
1 7000 8470 7700 7000 6300 5670 Statement Bill
5 Construction of night shelters RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
6 Construction of Road side BusStand
RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
TOTAL 500 13300 16390 14700 13300 11300 9390
18 | P a g e
CALCULATION OF BUDGETED EXPENDITURE FOR CSRACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR 2012-13
(Rs in Cr)-- Profit After Tax (PAT) for the year 2009-10 116500
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 forthe year 2010-11
3495
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities forthe year 2010-11
1720
-- Amount carried forward for the next year ie 2011-12
1775 A
-- PAT for the year 2010-11 140340
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2011-12
4210 B
-- Total Budget for the year 2011-12 (A+B) 5985 C
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities for theyear 2011-12
2650
-- Amount to be carried forward for the next year ie2012-13
3335 D
-- PAT for the year 2011-12 135420
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2012-13
4063 E
-- Total Budget for the year 2012-13 (D+E) 7398 F
20 | P a g e
Annexure-E
SD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific SD Plan and SDBudget passed by its Board or its Designated Committee will automatically berated as Poor in SD of MoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Sl No Activity
1 Whether Specific SD Plan andBudget passed by Board or itsDesignated Committee
YesNo
No and Date of Board Resolution
1 2
Table-1 SD Committee details
Board LevelDesignatedCommittee Name
Chairman of BoardLevel DesignatedCommittee
Number ofRegular meetingsheld
Key decisionsduring the year
1 2 3 4
4 4
21 | P a g e
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-2 Total SD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Target Value as of PAT
Total Expenditure(Current FY)(Rs in Lacs)
Profit after tax(Previous FY)(Rs in Lacs)
ActualExpenditure as
of PAT
1 2 3 405 x 13542 - 13542 68
Total score for this Table 10
Score allotted by the Task Force
Note The projected annual expenditure as of the PAT for the performance yearwill be considered as target for the year
Table 3 Projects chosen by CPSE
SlNo
ScheduleAB
ProjectActivity
(Please referAnnex-I)
Performance Indicator(please refer Annex-II and Para 653 of
guidelines)
TotalExpenditure
onProjectActi
vity(Rs inLacs)
DurationSML
Target Set(On a five
pointscale
Para 663of
guidelines
TargetAchiev
ed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 A NIT
DurgapurRain waterharvesting
Project objectives -To gainfully use rainwater
EnvironmentCondition Indicator(ECI)- To rechargeground water
Rs 12 lac L 5
22 | P a g e
ManagementPerformance Indicator(MPI)-One trainingon rain waterharvesting
2 B Training Projects objectives- To increaseawareness Knowledge
MPI - Implementationof policy on SD
Rs 1 Lac S 5
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-4 - Evaluation of Projects
No of projects evaluated by an Independent External AgencyExpertConsultant etc
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
14 | P a g e
Table-2 Projects chosen by CPSE
At the time of draft MoU Every year CPSEs shall submit RampD projects (Maharatna ampNavratna-Five projects Miniratna 0I amp II and other CPSEs below - Three projectsalongwith one most importantvitalkey performance Indicator to Task force at the time ofdraft MoU The Task Force will approve the same or add any other RampD projects alongwithperformance indicator(s)
At the time of MoU Evaluation The verification of achievement in respect of approvedperformance indicator(s) and evaluationrating of each RampD Project will be done byIndependent ExpertResearch Advisory Committee of CPSE Such evaluationrating will beconsidered accepted by Task Force during evaluation for allotting MoU score on RampD
Target Value
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10SlNo
ProjectsChosen
(Annex-I)
PerformanceIndicator
(Annex-II)
Wight-age
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor Actual
21 Admn Blockat MDURohtak
Development of softwareto monitortimelycompletionof projects ampFeedback onits efficacy
10 On amp beforescheduleddate ie310313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
22 ExaminationWing atMDURohtak
05 On amp beforescheduleddate ie150313
1monthdelay
2monthdelay
3monthdelay
4monthdelay
23 Study onEconomisingof PrefabStructure
10 20032013 250313
280313
310313
After310313
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score on RampD 5
Total allotted score for both tables
ANNEXURE- CPROJECT IMPLEMENTATION TARGETS (MILE STONE MOU 2012-13)
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
MOU TARGETS FOR CSR PROJECTS ( MOU 2012-13)Annexure - D
(Rs Lacs)S
NoName of Project Unit Weigh-
tageTgtExp
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor DocumentaryEvidence forevaluation
1 Merit-cum-Means ScholarshipScheme (100 expendituresupport) preferably for girlstudents
RsLacs
1 300 500 400 300 200 100 MOU withLoombaFoundation ampExpenditureStatement
2 Conducting Skills andEntrepreneurship DevelopmentProgram through trainingpartners of National SkillDevelopment Corporation
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 MOU withAgency andExpenditureStatement
3 Repair of Schools ProvidingToilets in Schools
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 RA Bill
4 Providing 5 nos Ambulance Mobile Medical Units withrunning cost of mobileMedicare Unit (for three years)
RsLacs
1 7000 8470 7700 7000 6300 5670 Statement Bill
5 Construction of night shelters RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
6 Construction of Road side BusStand
RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
TOTAL 500 13300 16390 14700 13300 11300 9390
18 | P a g e
CALCULATION OF BUDGETED EXPENDITURE FOR CSRACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR 2012-13
(Rs in Cr)-- Profit After Tax (PAT) for the year 2009-10 116500
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 forthe year 2010-11
3495
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities forthe year 2010-11
1720
-- Amount carried forward for the next year ie 2011-12
1775 A
-- PAT for the year 2010-11 140340
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2011-12
4210 B
-- Total Budget for the year 2011-12 (A+B) 5985 C
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities for theyear 2011-12
2650
-- Amount to be carried forward for the next year ie2012-13
3335 D
-- PAT for the year 2011-12 135420
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2012-13
4063 E
-- Total Budget for the year 2012-13 (D+E) 7398 F
20 | P a g e
Annexure-E
SD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific SD Plan and SDBudget passed by its Board or its Designated Committee will automatically berated as Poor in SD of MoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Sl No Activity
1 Whether Specific SD Plan andBudget passed by Board or itsDesignated Committee
YesNo
No and Date of Board Resolution
1 2
Table-1 SD Committee details
Board LevelDesignatedCommittee Name
Chairman of BoardLevel DesignatedCommittee
Number ofRegular meetingsheld
Key decisionsduring the year
1 2 3 4
4 4
21 | P a g e
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-2 Total SD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Target Value as of PAT
Total Expenditure(Current FY)(Rs in Lacs)
Profit after tax(Previous FY)(Rs in Lacs)
ActualExpenditure as
of PAT
1 2 3 405 x 13542 - 13542 68
Total score for this Table 10
Score allotted by the Task Force
Note The projected annual expenditure as of the PAT for the performance yearwill be considered as target for the year
Table 3 Projects chosen by CPSE
SlNo
ScheduleAB
ProjectActivity
(Please referAnnex-I)
Performance Indicator(please refer Annex-II and Para 653 of
guidelines)
TotalExpenditure
onProjectActi
vity(Rs inLacs)
DurationSML
Target Set(On a five
pointscale
Para 663of
guidelines
TargetAchiev
ed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 A NIT
DurgapurRain waterharvesting
Project objectives -To gainfully use rainwater
EnvironmentCondition Indicator(ECI)- To rechargeground water
Rs 12 lac L 5
22 | P a g e
ManagementPerformance Indicator(MPI)-One trainingon rain waterharvesting
2 B Training Projects objectives- To increaseawareness Knowledge
MPI - Implementationof policy on SD
Rs 1 Lac S 5
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-4 - Evaluation of Projects
No of projects evaluated by an Independent External AgencyExpertConsultant etc
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
ANNEXURE- CPROJECT IMPLEMENTATION TARGETS (MILE STONE MOU 2012-13)
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
MOU TARGETS FOR CSR PROJECTS ( MOU 2012-13)Annexure - D
(Rs Lacs)S
NoName of Project Unit Weigh-
tageTgtExp
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor DocumentaryEvidence forevaluation
1 Merit-cum-Means ScholarshipScheme (100 expendituresupport) preferably for girlstudents
RsLacs
1 300 500 400 300 200 100 MOU withLoombaFoundation ampExpenditureStatement
2 Conducting Skills andEntrepreneurship DevelopmentProgram through trainingpartners of National SkillDevelopment Corporation
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 MOU withAgency andExpenditureStatement
3 Repair of Schools ProvidingToilets in Schools
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 RA Bill
4 Providing 5 nos Ambulance Mobile Medical Units withrunning cost of mobileMedicare Unit (for three years)
RsLacs
1 7000 8470 7700 7000 6300 5670 Statement Bill
5 Construction of night shelters RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
6 Construction of Road side BusStand
RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
TOTAL 500 13300 16390 14700 13300 11300 9390
18 | P a g e
CALCULATION OF BUDGETED EXPENDITURE FOR CSRACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR 2012-13
(Rs in Cr)-- Profit After Tax (PAT) for the year 2009-10 116500
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 forthe year 2010-11
3495
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities forthe year 2010-11
1720
-- Amount carried forward for the next year ie 2011-12
1775 A
-- PAT for the year 2010-11 140340
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2011-12
4210 B
-- Total Budget for the year 2011-12 (A+B) 5985 C
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities for theyear 2011-12
2650
-- Amount to be carried forward for the next year ie2012-13
3335 D
-- PAT for the year 2011-12 135420
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2012-13
4063 E
-- Total Budget for the year 2012-13 (D+E) 7398 F
20 | P a g e
Annexure-E
SD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific SD Plan and SDBudget passed by its Board or its Designated Committee will automatically berated as Poor in SD of MoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Sl No Activity
1 Whether Specific SD Plan andBudget passed by Board or itsDesignated Committee
YesNo
No and Date of Board Resolution
1 2
Table-1 SD Committee details
Board LevelDesignatedCommittee Name
Chairman of BoardLevel DesignatedCommittee
Number ofRegular meetingsheld
Key decisionsduring the year
1 2 3 4
4 4
21 | P a g e
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-2 Total SD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Target Value as of PAT
Total Expenditure(Current FY)(Rs in Lacs)
Profit after tax(Previous FY)(Rs in Lacs)
ActualExpenditure as
of PAT
1 2 3 405 x 13542 - 13542 68
Total score for this Table 10
Score allotted by the Task Force
Note The projected annual expenditure as of the PAT for the performance yearwill be considered as target for the year
Table 3 Projects chosen by CPSE
SlNo
ScheduleAB
ProjectActivity
(Please referAnnex-I)
Performance Indicator(please refer Annex-II and Para 653 of
guidelines)
TotalExpenditure
onProjectActi
vity(Rs inLacs)
DurationSML
Target Set(On a five
pointscale
Para 663of
guidelines
TargetAchiev
ed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 A NIT
DurgapurRain waterharvesting
Project objectives -To gainfully use rainwater
EnvironmentCondition Indicator(ECI)- To rechargeground water
Rs 12 lac L 5
22 | P a g e
ManagementPerformance Indicator(MPI)-One trainingon rain waterharvesting
2 B Training Projects objectives- To increaseawareness Knowledge
MPI - Implementationof policy on SD
Rs 1 Lac S 5
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-4 - Evaluation of Projects
No of projects evaluated by an Independent External AgencyExpertConsultant etc
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
MOU TARGETS FOR CSR PROJECTS ( MOU 2012-13)Annexure - D
(Rs Lacs)S
NoName of Project Unit Weigh-
tageTgtExp
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor DocumentaryEvidence forevaluation
1 Merit-cum-Means ScholarshipScheme (100 expendituresupport) preferably for girlstudents
RsLacs
1 300 500 400 300 200 100 MOU withLoombaFoundation ampExpenditureStatement
2 Conducting Skills andEntrepreneurship DevelopmentProgram through trainingpartners of National SkillDevelopment Corporation
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 MOU withAgency andExpenditureStatement
3 Repair of Schools ProvidingToilets in Schools
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 RA Bill
4 Providing 5 nos Ambulance Mobile Medical Units withrunning cost of mobileMedicare Unit (for three years)
RsLacs
1 7000 8470 7700 7000 6300 5670 Statement Bill
5 Construction of night shelters RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
6 Construction of Road side BusStand
RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
TOTAL 500 13300 16390 14700 13300 11300 9390
18 | P a g e
CALCULATION OF BUDGETED EXPENDITURE FOR CSRACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR 2012-13
(Rs in Cr)-- Profit After Tax (PAT) for the year 2009-10 116500
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 forthe year 2010-11
3495
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities forthe year 2010-11
1720
-- Amount carried forward for the next year ie 2011-12
1775 A
-- PAT for the year 2010-11 140340
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2011-12
4210 B
-- Total Budget for the year 2011-12 (A+B) 5985 C
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities for theyear 2011-12
2650
-- Amount to be carried forward for the next year ie2012-13
3335 D
-- PAT for the year 2011-12 135420
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2012-13
4063 E
-- Total Budget for the year 2012-13 (D+E) 7398 F
20 | P a g e
Annexure-E
SD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific SD Plan and SDBudget passed by its Board or its Designated Committee will automatically berated as Poor in SD of MoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Sl No Activity
1 Whether Specific SD Plan andBudget passed by Board or itsDesignated Committee
YesNo
No and Date of Board Resolution
1 2
Table-1 SD Committee details
Board LevelDesignatedCommittee Name
Chairman of BoardLevel DesignatedCommittee
Number ofRegular meetingsheld
Key decisionsduring the year
1 2 3 4
4 4
21 | P a g e
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-2 Total SD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Target Value as of PAT
Total Expenditure(Current FY)(Rs in Lacs)
Profit after tax(Previous FY)(Rs in Lacs)
ActualExpenditure as
of PAT
1 2 3 405 x 13542 - 13542 68
Total score for this Table 10
Score allotted by the Task Force
Note The projected annual expenditure as of the PAT for the performance yearwill be considered as target for the year
Table 3 Projects chosen by CPSE
SlNo
ScheduleAB
ProjectActivity
(Please referAnnex-I)
Performance Indicator(please refer Annex-II and Para 653 of
guidelines)
TotalExpenditure
onProjectActi
vity(Rs inLacs)
DurationSML
Target Set(On a five
pointscale
Para 663of
guidelines
TargetAchiev
ed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 A NIT
DurgapurRain waterharvesting
Project objectives -To gainfully use rainwater
EnvironmentCondition Indicator(ECI)- To rechargeground water
Rs 12 lac L 5
22 | P a g e
ManagementPerformance Indicator(MPI)-One trainingon rain waterharvesting
2 B Training Projects objectives- To increaseawareness Knowledge
MPI - Implementationof policy on SD
Rs 1 Lac S 5
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-4 - Evaluation of Projects
No of projects evaluated by an Independent External AgencyExpertConsultant etc
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
MOU TARGETS FOR CSR PROJECTS ( MOU 2012-13)Annexure - D
(Rs Lacs)S
NoName of Project Unit Weigh-
tageTgtExp
Excellent VeryGood
Good Fair Poor DocumentaryEvidence forevaluation
1 Merit-cum-Means ScholarshipScheme (100 expendituresupport) preferably for girlstudents
RsLacs
1 300 500 400 300 200 100 MOU withLoombaFoundation ampExpenditureStatement
2 Conducting Skills andEntrepreneurship DevelopmentProgram through trainingpartners of National SkillDevelopment Corporation
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 MOU withAgency andExpenditureStatement
3 Repair of Schools ProvidingToilets in Schools
RsLacs
1 2000 2500 2200 2000 1500 1000 RA Bill
4 Providing 5 nos Ambulance Mobile Medical Units withrunning cost of mobileMedicare Unit (for three years)
RsLacs
1 7000 8470 7700 7000 6300 5670 Statement Bill
5 Construction of night shelters RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
6 Construction of Road side BusStand
RsLacs
05 1000 1210 1100 1000 900 810 Statement Bill
TOTAL 500 13300 16390 14700 13300 11300 9390
18 | P a g e
CALCULATION OF BUDGETED EXPENDITURE FOR CSRACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR 2012-13
(Rs in Cr)-- Profit After Tax (PAT) for the year 2009-10 116500
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 forthe year 2010-11
3495
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities forthe year 2010-11
1720
-- Amount carried forward for the next year ie 2011-12
1775 A
-- PAT for the year 2010-11 140340
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2011-12
4210 B
-- Total Budget for the year 2011-12 (A+B) 5985 C
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities for theyear 2011-12
2650
-- Amount to be carried forward for the next year ie2012-13
3335 D
-- PAT for the year 2011-12 135420
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2012-13
4063 E
-- Total Budget for the year 2012-13 (D+E) 7398 F
20 | P a g e
Annexure-E
SD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific SD Plan and SDBudget passed by its Board or its Designated Committee will automatically berated as Poor in SD of MoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Sl No Activity
1 Whether Specific SD Plan andBudget passed by Board or itsDesignated Committee
YesNo
No and Date of Board Resolution
1 2
Table-1 SD Committee details
Board LevelDesignatedCommittee Name
Chairman of BoardLevel DesignatedCommittee
Number ofRegular meetingsheld
Key decisionsduring the year
1 2 3 4
4 4
21 | P a g e
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-2 Total SD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Target Value as of PAT
Total Expenditure(Current FY)(Rs in Lacs)
Profit after tax(Previous FY)(Rs in Lacs)
ActualExpenditure as
of PAT
1 2 3 405 x 13542 - 13542 68
Total score for this Table 10
Score allotted by the Task Force
Note The projected annual expenditure as of the PAT for the performance yearwill be considered as target for the year
Table 3 Projects chosen by CPSE
SlNo
ScheduleAB
ProjectActivity
(Please referAnnex-I)
Performance Indicator(please refer Annex-II and Para 653 of
guidelines)
TotalExpenditure
onProjectActi
vity(Rs inLacs)
DurationSML
Target Set(On a five
pointscale
Para 663of
guidelines
TargetAchiev
ed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 A NIT
DurgapurRain waterharvesting
Project objectives -To gainfully use rainwater
EnvironmentCondition Indicator(ECI)- To rechargeground water
Rs 12 lac L 5
22 | P a g e
ManagementPerformance Indicator(MPI)-One trainingon rain waterharvesting
2 B Training Projects objectives- To increaseawareness Knowledge
MPI - Implementationof policy on SD
Rs 1 Lac S 5
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-4 - Evaluation of Projects
No of projects evaluated by an Independent External AgencyExpertConsultant etc
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
18 | P a g e
CALCULATION OF BUDGETED EXPENDITURE FOR CSRACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR 2012-13
(Rs in Cr)-- Profit After Tax (PAT) for the year 2009-10 116500
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 forthe year 2010-11
3495
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities forthe year 2010-11
1720
-- Amount carried forward for the next year ie 2011-12
1775 A
-- PAT for the year 2010-11 140340
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2011-12
4210 B
-- Total Budget for the year 2011-12 (A+B) 5985 C
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities for theyear 2011-12
2650
-- Amount to be carried forward for the next year ie2012-13
3335 D
-- PAT for the year 2011-12 135420
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2012-13
4063 E
-- Total Budget for the year 2012-13 (D+E) 7398 F
20 | P a g e
Annexure-E
SD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific SD Plan and SDBudget passed by its Board or its Designated Committee will automatically berated as Poor in SD of MoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Sl No Activity
1 Whether Specific SD Plan andBudget passed by Board or itsDesignated Committee
YesNo
No and Date of Board Resolution
1 2
Table-1 SD Committee details
Board LevelDesignatedCommittee Name
Chairman of BoardLevel DesignatedCommittee
Number ofRegular meetingsheld
Key decisionsduring the year
1 2 3 4
4 4
21 | P a g e
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-2 Total SD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Target Value as of PAT
Total Expenditure(Current FY)(Rs in Lacs)
Profit after tax(Previous FY)(Rs in Lacs)
ActualExpenditure as
of PAT
1 2 3 405 x 13542 - 13542 68
Total score for this Table 10
Score allotted by the Task Force
Note The projected annual expenditure as of the PAT for the performance yearwill be considered as target for the year
Table 3 Projects chosen by CPSE
SlNo
ScheduleAB
ProjectActivity
(Please referAnnex-I)
Performance Indicator(please refer Annex-II and Para 653 of
guidelines)
TotalExpenditure
onProjectActi
vity(Rs inLacs)
DurationSML
Target Set(On a five
pointscale
Para 663of
guidelines
TargetAchiev
ed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 A NIT
DurgapurRain waterharvesting
Project objectives -To gainfully use rainwater
EnvironmentCondition Indicator(ECI)- To rechargeground water
Rs 12 lac L 5
22 | P a g e
ManagementPerformance Indicator(MPI)-One trainingon rain waterharvesting
2 B Training Projects objectives- To increaseawareness Knowledge
MPI - Implementationof policy on SD
Rs 1 Lac S 5
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-4 - Evaluation of Projects
No of projects evaluated by an Independent External AgencyExpertConsultant etc
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
CALCULATION OF BUDGETED EXPENDITURE FOR CSRACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR 2012-13
(Rs in Cr)-- Profit After Tax (PAT) for the year 2009-10 116500
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 forthe year 2010-11
3495
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities forthe year 2010-11
1720
-- Amount carried forward for the next year ie 2011-12
1775 A
-- PAT for the year 2010-11 140340
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2011-12
4210 B
-- Total Budget for the year 2011-12 (A+B) 5985 C
-- Less Expenditure done on CSR Activities for theyear 2011-12
2650
-- Amount to be carried forward for the next year ie2012-13
3335 D
-- PAT for the year 2011-12 135420
-- Budget allocation for CSR Activities 3 for theyear 2012-13
4063 E
-- Total Budget for the year 2012-13 (D+E) 7398 F
20 | P a g e
Annexure-E
SD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific SD Plan and SDBudget passed by its Board or its Designated Committee will automatically berated as Poor in SD of MoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Sl No Activity
1 Whether Specific SD Plan andBudget passed by Board or itsDesignated Committee
YesNo
No and Date of Board Resolution
1 2
Table-1 SD Committee details
Board LevelDesignatedCommittee Name
Chairman of BoardLevel DesignatedCommittee
Number ofRegular meetingsheld
Key decisionsduring the year
1 2 3 4
4 4
21 | P a g e
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-2 Total SD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Target Value as of PAT
Total Expenditure(Current FY)(Rs in Lacs)
Profit after tax(Previous FY)(Rs in Lacs)
ActualExpenditure as
of PAT
1 2 3 405 x 13542 - 13542 68
Total score for this Table 10
Score allotted by the Task Force
Note The projected annual expenditure as of the PAT for the performance yearwill be considered as target for the year
Table 3 Projects chosen by CPSE
SlNo
ScheduleAB
ProjectActivity
(Please referAnnex-I)
Performance Indicator(please refer Annex-II and Para 653 of
guidelines)
TotalExpenditure
onProjectActi
vity(Rs inLacs)
DurationSML
Target Set(On a five
pointscale
Para 663of
guidelines
TargetAchiev
ed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 A NIT
DurgapurRain waterharvesting
Project objectives -To gainfully use rainwater
EnvironmentCondition Indicator(ECI)- To rechargeground water
Rs 12 lac L 5
22 | P a g e
ManagementPerformance Indicator(MPI)-One trainingon rain waterharvesting
2 B Training Projects objectives- To increaseawareness Knowledge
MPI - Implementationof policy on SD
Rs 1 Lac S 5
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-4 - Evaluation of Projects
No of projects evaluated by an Independent External AgencyExpertConsultant etc
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
20 | P a g e
Annexure-E
SD PERFORMANCE TARGET SETTING CUM EVALUATION TEMPLATE
1 To be filled and submitted by each CPSE to the Task Force prior to AnnualTarget Setting as well as performance evaluation of MoU
2 Circuit Breaker Any CPSE which has not got its specific SD Plan and SDBudget passed by its Board or its Designated Committee will automatically berated as Poor in SD of MoU
3 CPSE while submitting self-evaluation report to DPE will not fill up scoreallotted for each Table and the Total Score as the same will be awarded bythe Task Force at the time of performance evaluation of the MoU
Sl No Activity
1 Whether Specific SD Plan andBudget passed by Board or itsDesignated Committee
YesNo
No and Date of Board Resolution
1 2
Table-1 SD Committee details
Board LevelDesignatedCommittee Name
Chairman of BoardLevel DesignatedCommittee
Number ofRegular meetingsheld
Key decisionsduring the year
1 2 3 4
4 4
21 | P a g e
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-2 Total SD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Target Value as of PAT
Total Expenditure(Current FY)(Rs in Lacs)
Profit after tax(Previous FY)(Rs in Lacs)
ActualExpenditure as
of PAT
1 2 3 405 x 13542 - 13542 68
Total score for this Table 10
Score allotted by the Task Force
Note The projected annual expenditure as of the PAT for the performance yearwill be considered as target for the year
Table 3 Projects chosen by CPSE
SlNo
ScheduleAB
ProjectActivity
(Please referAnnex-I)
Performance Indicator(please refer Annex-II and Para 653 of
guidelines)
TotalExpenditure
onProjectActi
vity(Rs inLacs)
DurationSML
Target Set(On a five
pointscale
Para 663of
guidelines
TargetAchiev
ed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 A NIT
DurgapurRain waterharvesting
Project objectives -To gainfully use rainwater
EnvironmentCondition Indicator(ECI)- To rechargeground water
Rs 12 lac L 5
22 | P a g e
ManagementPerformance Indicator(MPI)-One trainingon rain waterharvesting
2 B Training Projects objectives- To increaseawareness Knowledge
MPI - Implementationof policy on SD
Rs 1 Lac S 5
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-4 - Evaluation of Projects
No of projects evaluated by an Independent External AgencyExpertConsultant etc
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
21 | P a g e
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-2 Total SD Expenditure as a percentage of PAT
Target Value as of PAT
Total Expenditure(Current FY)(Rs in Lacs)
Profit after tax(Previous FY)(Rs in Lacs)
ActualExpenditure as
of PAT
1 2 3 405 x 13542 - 13542 68
Total score for this Table 10
Score allotted by the Task Force
Note The projected annual expenditure as of the PAT for the performance yearwill be considered as target for the year
Table 3 Projects chosen by CPSE
SlNo
ScheduleAB
ProjectActivity
(Please referAnnex-I)
Performance Indicator(please refer Annex-II and Para 653 of
guidelines)
TotalExpenditure
onProjectActi
vity(Rs inLacs)
DurationSML
Target Set(On a five
pointscale
Para 663of
guidelines
TargetAchiev
ed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 A NIT
DurgapurRain waterharvesting
Project objectives -To gainfully use rainwater
EnvironmentCondition Indicator(ECI)- To rechargeground water
Rs 12 lac L 5
22 | P a g e
ManagementPerformance Indicator(MPI)-One trainingon rain waterharvesting
2 B Training Projects objectives- To increaseawareness Knowledge
MPI - Implementationof policy on SD
Rs 1 Lac S 5
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-4 - Evaluation of Projects
No of projects evaluated by an Independent External AgencyExpertConsultant etc
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
22 | P a g e
ManagementPerformance Indicator(MPI)-One trainingon rain waterharvesting
2 B Training Projects objectives- To increaseawareness Knowledge
MPI - Implementationof policy on SD
Rs 1 Lac S 5
Total Score for this table 25
Score allotted by the Task Force
Table-4 - Evaluation of Projects
No of projects evaluated by an Independent External AgencyExpertConsultant etc
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
23 | P a g e
Table-5 - Publication of SD Performance Report
Activity Yes No Mode of SD Report
(If reported whether a stand-aloneSD Report or a part of Annual
Report etc)
1 2 3
SD Performance Report
Total Score for this table 05
Score allotted by the Task Force
Total Score of all Tables 5
Total allotted score for all tables
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
24 | P a g e
PART-IV
COMMITMENTS ASSISTANCE FROM THEGOVERNMENT
1 To pursue with GNCTD to comply with the orders of HighCourt relating to land at Ghitorni
2 To assist NBCC to procure land from State Govts Development Authorities for construction of affordablehousing
3 To assist NBCC in procuring business from otherGovernment Departments Agencies
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
25 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
31 | P a g e