melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

114
MELT TRANSFORMATION EXTRUSION OF SOY PROTEIN; /' A Thesis Presented to / The Faculty of the College of Engineering and Technology Ohio University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree Master of Science by Corry S. Hendrowarsito ;;:;' November, 1984 OHIO UNIVERSITY LIBRARY

Upload: others

Post on 11-Sep-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

MELT TRANSFORMATION EXTRUSION OF SOY PROTEIN;/'

A Thesis Presented to

/

The Faculty of the College of Engineering and Technology

Ohio University

In Partial Fulfillment

of the Requirement for the Degree

Master of Science

by

Corry S. Hendrowarsito;;:;'

November, 1984

OHIO UNIVERSITYLIBRARY

Page 2: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to express her appreciation to

Professor John R. Collier, without whose guidance and

counsel this study could have not been possible. Thanks is

al so extended to the facul ty of the Department of Cherni cal

Engineering for their advice and help. Special thanks is

also due to Indro Subowo, whose help and patience were

invaluable.

Finally, thanks is due to my parents and brothers whose

support were unlimited.

i

Page 3: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

ABSTRACT

Hendrowarsito, Corry Suzannadevi. M.S. November 1984.Chemical EngineeringDirector of Thesis: Dr. John R. CollierTitle: Melt Transfor.ation Extrusion of Soy Protein (pp.104, 42 figures, 12 tables)

The purpose of thi s research was to apply the ~1el t

Transformation Extrusion Process to the extrusion of soy

protein. As a result, an improved layered fibrous texture

occurs in soy protein extrudates.

Commercially, fibrous soy protein products are used as

meat extenders and substitutes. The premoist soy protein was

extruded in a system consisting of 3/4 1t - d i a me t e r Brabender

single screw extruder, an eighteen inch conditioner zone,

and a uniaxial die having a deformation ratio of 24:1, 1/16 11

x 1/2 11 ribbons were produced. Variables studied included

process temperature profile (160-90 oC), screw speed (40-80

RPt4) and moisture content (30-40%). The effect of these

variables on die pressure, absorption, bulk density, product

temperature, and extruder throughput was investigated using

response surface analysis. Studies using optical and

scanning electron microscopy were conducted to examine the

product structure.

i i

Page 4: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

The r~TE process produced higher pressure drops

(300-1500 psi) and longer residence times (5-15 minutes)

compared to the more conventional low pressure extrusion

(less than 500 psi).

Control of both shear rate or stress, and temperature

profile were found to be the most important factors. Product

temperature and operating pressure were significantly

affected by screw speed. Shear rate or stress, and pressure

decreased with increasing moisture.

The best operating conditions for maximum texturization

. 0 0 0 0were a temperature pr o f t l e of 160 -135 -110 -50 C, 80 RPM,

and 40% moisture. Differential scanning calorimetry was

employed to determine the crystallinity of the dough. The

result indicated that DSC was not an appropriate method.

Scanning electron microscopy displayed clearly the

physical changes which occurred due to process conditions.

iii

Page 5: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Table of Contents

Page

List of Figures

List of Tables ..

Chapter

vi

i x

1 . Introduction 1

2. Background of Study ..

2.1 Protein

4

6

2.2

2 • 3

Soy Protein and Its Commercial Use

Mechanism of Fiber Formation.

8

11

3. Theory 16

3.1 Melt Transformation ExtrusionProcess (MTE) ••••••• 16

3.1.1 Shear Stress and Flow InducedCrystallization . . . . . . 17

3.1.2 Pressure Effect on Crystallization 21

3.2 Extrusion Cooking

3.3 Characteristics of Textured ProteinProd uc ts . . . • . . . • . . .

3.4 Response Surface Analysis (RSA)

4. Description of Equipment and Material

24

28

29

31

5 • Experimental Procedure

5.1 Preliminary Experimentation

5.2 Experimentation

5.3 Specimen Testings

i v

40

41

45

47

Page 6: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Chapter

6. Results .......•.

7. Discussion ...

8. Conclusion ....•.•..

9. Recommendation ...

Bi bl t ography •......•.

Appendixes

A. Experimental Data •.••••••

B. Response Surface Analysis Program

C. Response Surface Analysis Results

v

Page

50

74

87

89

91

97

101

102

Page 7: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

list of Figures

Figure

1. Mechanism of Protein Denaturation.

Page

12

2 . Structure of Spherulite . 18

3 . Su99ested i~ 0 del for Fib e r For mat ion •

4. Elongational Flow in a Converging Die ..

18

20

5 . Nematic Liquid Crystalline Form. 22

6. Cross Section of a Typical Food Extruder. 25

7 . Sc he (0a tic Di a gram for the Un i a x i a 1- rib bon Die 33

8 .

9 .

10.

Schematic Diagram for the Fiber Die

Photograph of Uniaxial Die Halves.

Photograph of Fiber Die Pieces ..•

34

35

35

11. Schematic Diagram for the Extrusion Processwith a Melt Conditioner Zone . . . 38

12 .

13 .

14.

Front View of the Extrusion Set-up

Simplified Extrusion Flow Sheet

Extrusion Rate versus Screw Speed atdifferent Moisture Contents ...

39

45

52

15. Extrusion Rate versus Screw Speed atdifferent Process Temperature. 53

16. The Effect of Screw Speed and Moisture on theExtrusion Rate at 8 Constant ProcessingTemperature of 150 C (zone II). • . . • 54

17. The Effect of Processing Temperature andMoisture on Extrusion Rate at a ConstantScrew Speed of 70 RPM ••..••.... 55

vi

Page 8: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Figure

18.

19 .

20.

Page

Die Pressure versus Screw Speed at differentProcessing Temperatures · · · . . . . · . . 56

Die Pressure versus Screw Speed at differentNoisture Contents . . . · · · · . . 57

Die Pressure versus Screw Speed for the FiberDie Runs . . . . . . . · · · . . · 59

21. The Effect of Screw Speed and Moisture on theDie Pressure at a COBstant ProcessingTemperature of 152.8 C (zone II). . . . 60

22. The Effect of Temperature and Moisture on theDie Pressure at a Constant Screw Speed of45 RPM • • • • •• •••••• 61

23. The Effect of Temperature and Screw Speed onthe Die Pressure at a Constant MoistureContent of 40 w/o • • • • • • • . • • • 62

24. DSC Endotherm for Indium 63

25. Typical DSC Endotherm of Texturized SoyProtein Product ... ...•.. 64

26. The Effect of Temperature and Moisture on theProduct Absorption at a Constant MoistureContent of 35 wlo . . . . . . 65

27. The Effect of Temperature and Moisture on theProduct Absorption at a Constant ScrewSpeed of 70 RPM ••• •••••• 66

28. The Effect of Screw Speed and Moisture on theProduct Absorptionoat a Constant ProcessingTemperature of 150 C (zone II) .•.• 67

29. The Effect of Temperature and Screw Speed onthe Product Bulk Density at a ConstantMoisture Content of 35 w/o • • • • • • 69

30. The Effect of Temperature and Moisture on theProduct Bulk Density at a Constant ScrewSpeed of 76 RPM •...•..•.•••. 70

v; i

Page 9: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Figure Page

31. The Effect of Temperature and Screw Speed onthe Product Temperature at a ConstantMoisture Content of 27 wlo .. . . . . 71

32. The Effect of Temperature and Moisture on theProduct Temperature at a Constant ScrewSpeed of 135 RPM . .. 72

33. The Effect of Temperature and Moisture on theProduct Temperature at a Constant Process-ing Temperature of 140°C (zone II) .... 73

34. Optical Micrograph of Fiber Die Runs, 12X .. 77

35. Scanning Electron Micrograph of Run F4 showsporous structure, 700X . . . . . . . . .. 77

36. Processing Temperature Profile at differentHeating Zones. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 81

37. Residence Time versus Screw Speed 83

38. Scanning Electron Micrograph of UntexturizedSoy Protein with Strands of Fibers, lOOOX. 84

39. Optical Microscope of Fibrous Structure ofRun F3, 150X . . . . . . . . . • . . . .. 84

40. Scanning Electron Micrograph of IsolatedFiber of Run F3, 4000x . .. ... 86

41. Scanning Electron Micrograph of Run 13, lOOOX 86

42. SAS Program . • .

vii i

101

Page 10: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Table

list of Tables

Page

1. Extruded versus Spun Texturizing Ingredients 5

3. Amino Acid Composition

2 • Typical Composition of Soy Flours,Concentrates and Isolates 9

9

4. Changes in Characteristics of Soybean Proteinat High Temperature Heating. . . . . . .. 15

5. Experimental Pattern of Processing ConditionCode s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 44

6. Effects of Variables on Extrudate Character-istics . . . . . . . . 75

7. Die Temperatures

8. Flow Rates .....

97

98

9 • Pressure Profiles. 99

10. Extrusion characteristics 100

12. Analysis of Variance

11 . Regression Coefficients. 102

103

13. Levels of Variables Significance on ExtrudateCharacteri sti cs • . . . • . • . . • • • •• 104

ix

Page 11: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Chapter 1

INTRODUCTION

The texturization of vegetable protein products to

simulate meat has been one of the significant developments

in the food engineering industry. Once these products have

been texturized and rehydrated they can be used as meat

extenders or total meat substitutes.

Food manufacturers are interested in these products,

because their use as ingredients imparts favorable changes

in the structure, texture, and composition of the finished

foods, at an attractive price. Those products which have

been texturally and histologically restructured through

processing have fibrous structures and integrity similar to

that of muscle ti ssue. They can be produced by one of the

two basic processes, wet spinning and thermoplastic

extrusion [1]. The topic of this work is the extruded

material.

Theoretically, the temperature of extrusion varies from

80 0 to 17SoC (180 o-350 oF). There is very little degradation

o f the protein, which contains 20 to 40% moisture. The

resulting pressure ranges from 14 to 60 atm (200-900 psi).

Al though the process has rel ied heavily on the theory of

plastic extrusion, food extrusion cooking has some

characteristics of its own. All aspects of production,

Page 12: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

2

storage, handling and environment should be considered a­

long with economic considerations.

At Ohio University, a melt transformation extrusion

(MTE) process to produce highly oriented semi-crystalline

polymers has been investigated by Collier [3J. In this

process a plasticating extruder supplies molten polymer to

specifically designed dies through a melt conditioner

(medium pressure pipe). The molecules of the molten polymer

are partially oriented by passing the material through this

conditioner zone (2000-8000 psi) immediately before ex­

trusion through a converging die. As shown in this research,

MTE was at a lower pressure range (500-2000 psi). This

process was useful in enhancing the fibrous texture of soy

protein.

Reports have dealt with the extrusion texturization of

soy protei n. The product characteri sti cs are thought to be

dependent upon the following independent variables: screw

speed, feed rate, moisture, product temperature, residence

time, and protein content [3-5]. The objective of this

investigation was to apply the MTE process to soy protein

and to observe a definite layered structure of fibers in the

soy protein extrudate under the predetermined conditions.

Texture was used as the basic tool of observation. It

can be viewed as a direct consequence of microstructure,

which originates from chemical composition and physical

forces acting upon it. Scanning electron micrographs of the

Page 13: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

3

inner layers will be used to reveal the morphology of the

soy protein extrudate. Advantages of using the scanning

electron micrographs in studying the ultrastructure of

soybean and soy protein have been shown by previous

researchers [6-8]. Optical microscopic observations have

also been used in support of the textural observations.

Page 14: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Chapter 2

BACKGROUND OF STUDY

In recent years texturized vegetable protein process

for the transformation of powdered soy protein into a

meat-l ike texture has received some acceptance and

popularity. The simulation of meat depends on such textural

characteristics as thickness, smoothness, cohesiveness,

shear and friction forces [9]. It has been thought that

this kind of texture develops with the formation of fibers.

Fiber formation can be obtained through several process

which can be either chemical or physical.

Many new processes have been developed to yield

textured protein products. The two most basic industrial

processes for generating texture from proteins are spinning

and extrusion. Spinning of protein fibers involves

modification of the isolated protein through solubilization

in alkali [10]. During the alkali treatment the globular

protein unwinds and deaggregates to form a series of

dispersed flexible chains. When the material is ready for

spinning, it is forced into alignment through a porous

membrane. Protein fibers (about 0.003 in diameter), which

are partially oriented, are coagulated in an acid bath. The

fibers are then stretched to a desirable strength and cut

into a desirable size. The stretching causes further

Page 15: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

5

orientation of the protein fibers.

On the other hand,' the thermoplastic extrusion process

is a simpler process. Researchers have detailed variations

of the basic thermoplastic extrusion process [11-14]. The

process involves plasticizing flour and water in an extruder

to high temperatures and pressure. The emerging extrudate

flashes off steam and expands, resulting in a dry and

textured product. This technique has been chosen for this

study because of its advantages over the spinning process

(table 1), and its similarities to the MTE process. Other

processes that are less popular are gelation [15J and direct

steam texturization [16]. Thus, extrusion is not the only

method of texturization [17]. Further details on the

extrusion process and soy protein will follow in chapter 3.

Table 1. Extruded versus Spun Texturizing Ingredients [14J

Thermoplasticextrusion

Fi berspinning

Advantages

*Inexpensive*Simple process*Good protein quality*Can absorb waterand fat

*Thermodynamicallyeffecti ve

*Versatile*Good structuredanalogue texture

Disadvantages

*Limited use*Poor structuredanalogue texture

*Flavor, color

*Expensive*Technically difficult*Low protein quality*Flavor, color

Page 16: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

6

2.1 Protein

Native protein molecules are known to be folded with

well-defined, unique three dimensional structures. Princi-

pally the molecules of proteins are made up of carbon, hy-

drogen, oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur and some traces of phospo-

ruse The protein consists of small units, called amino

acids. These amino acids play a very important role in

pol ymer t za t t on to form a long chained molecule. They have

toe following chemical formulas typified by [18]:

leucine

CH 3

>CH~HCOOHCH 3 NH 2

isoleucine

lysine

CH 3

>CHyHCOOH

CH 3 NH 2valine

The amino (-NH 2) and carboxyl (-COOH) groups are

chemically active, basic and acidic, respectively. Thus the

Page 17: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

7

amino group of one amino acid readily combines with the

carboxyl group of another and forms a peptide bond at the

center (eq. 1).

o RII I

NH 2-R '-CH2-COOH + NH 2-R-CH 2-COOH -- H2-y-C-j-I-COOH + H20R' H H (1)

dipeptide

The remaining free amino and carboxyl groups at the end can

react with independent amino acids to form polypeptides.

The possibility of variations among proteins is

enormous. This variation depends on a combination of

different amino acids, different sequences of amino acid

wi thi n a cha in and di fferent shapes the cha in assumes. The

chain can be coiled, folded or straight. These differences

are responsible for the differences in texture of the

proteins. This complex configuration of a protein can be

modified to form fibrous texture by subjecting the material

to external forces utilizing protein psychochemical

properties (dough forming, film forming, moisture holding,

emulsifying, thickening, gelling, stabilizing, cohesiveness

and others [19]).

Page 18: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

8

2.2 Soy Protein and Its Co.mercial Use

The utilization of soy protein depends on its

functional and physical properties, nutritional and

economical values. The functional value of soy protein,

including its physical and chemical properties, have been

reported [20-22]. Some of these properties, such as

emulsification, viscocity and water holding capacity are

important in meat formulation. These functional properties,

which contribute performance aspects in affecting structure

and texture formation, outweigh their nutritive contribution

[23].

There are three types of commercially available soy

protei n: soy flour (1 ess than 65~ protei n ) , soy protei n

concentrate (65 to 89% protein), and soy protein isolate

(90% and higher protein) [23-24]. All three types of these

products can be used to yield a range of textured vegetable

protein; the cost increases with the protein concentration.

A typical analysis of soy protein concentration is tabulated

in table 2. Soy concentrates (70%) is used as the raw

material in this study.

There are three dietary uses of texturized vegetable

protein (TVP) [26]:

Page 19: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Table 2. Typical Composition of Soy Flours, Concentrates andIsolates [25J

Per cent (moisture-free basis)Soy flours Concentrates Isolates

Protein 56.0 72.0 96.0Fat 1.0 1.0 0.1Fibre 3.5 4.5 0.1Ash 6.0 5.0 3.5Carbohydrates (soluble) 14.0 2.5 0carbohydrates (insoluble) 19.5 15.0 0.3

Table 3. Amino Acid Compo s t t ion'' [26J

9

Amino Acid

ArginineHistidineIsoleucineLeucineLysineMethionineMethionine + cystinePhenylalanineThreonineTryptophanValine

Soy flour

7.02.44.27.76.41.02.24.73.61.74.4

bFAO reference protein

2.02.44.24.84.22.24.22.82.61.44.2

aIn, grams per 16 g N.

bFood and Agticulture Organization

Page 20: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

10

(1) Analogues: products which are made to resemble another

product.

(2) Supplements: products which are made to meet a

deficiency. They are not added for textural purposes but

for their functional properties, especially to bind fat

and moisture.

(3) Extenders: to stretch out food which is available. This

is the most common use for extruded textured proteins.

They can be used with meat to reduce prices and, in some

cases, to improve quality.

It can be seen that in nutritional value the TVP is

comparable to meat. Soy protein is known to contain all of

the essential amino acids needed by the human body, except

it has a lower than desirable content of sulfur-containing

methionine (table 3). Hegarty and Ahn [27J proved the

nutritive value in soybeans by comparing soy-based meat

analog with ground beef.

Finally, soybean protein is abundant, commercially

available and inexpensive. It is the largest cash crop in

the United States, exceeding corn, wheat and cotton. It is

used extensively in the food industry. The price of the

texturized materials range from 27-45 cents per pound on a

dry basis, which after hydration translates into a 9-15

cents per pound meat replacement [25].

Page 21: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

11

2.3 Mechanis. of Fiber For.ation

The mechanism of protein texturization during extrusion

cooking is not clearly understood. Many researchers have

reported that the extruder environment enhances the trans­

formation of amorphous soy protein to fibrous microstruc­

tures [14,31,59-63]. A fiber is defined as a body of matter

having a high ratio of length to lateral dimension and which

is principally composed of longitudinally oriented linear

molecules [28]. Fiber can be thought of as a result of

realignment of protein subunits that are disassambled due to

pressure and heat of the extruder environment. This re­

alignment is done by the shearing action of the extruder

[29,30]. Smith emphasizes that the cooking extruder has the

ability to work dough to restructure and retexture the

proteins [31].

Thermal denaturation, which is the key parameter of

texturization, involves gelation and restructuring. The

process is irreversible and is described through a sequence

of steps. Figure 1 shows the formation of hydrogen bonds and

amide bonds between aligned molecules in a denatured state.

During heating, the ionic, disulfide, hydrogen bonds and van

der Waals' forces organizing and holding the native

globular proteins are interrupted and the hydrated proteins

begin to unfold. The relatively linear protein chains are

Page 22: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Native state

unfolding

12

AssociatingAmide bond

Figure 1. Mechanism of Protein Denaturation [23J

Page 23: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

13

oriented through a shear environment, so that the reactive

sites on adjacent molecules can cross-link the protein to

achieve a fibrous texture [29,30,33].

Previous reports suggest that formation of fibers

involves the formation of certain types of intermolecular

peptide bonds (see section 2.1). The work of Cumming et al.

[34] describes the pressure and temperature influences on

the dissociation of soy protein into subunits which

subsequently become insolubilized and form high molecular

weight aggregate. On studying the formation of spun soy

fibers, Jenkins [35] demonstrated that the fibrous texture

of extruded soy protein can be improved by adding an

elemental sulfur-containing adjunct. It is believed that

molecular changes occur in the elongated curled protein

molecules by lateral reaction of the cystine bonds

{NH2 - CH- C02H)2 formed by amino acid groups between the

peptide chains, which are generally parallel and

overlapping. In 1976, Burgess and Stanley [36] suggested

that lIisopeptide ll crosslinking may playa role. They assumed

that crosslinking of protein chains occur through amide

bonds between free carboxyl and amino acid side groups of

the protein chains.

The energy for the endothermic denaturation process

consisting of breaking and forming of new bonds was

determined using differential scanning calorimetry to be

endothermic (90-100 KJ/KG) [37]. Sensible heat changes

Page 24: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

occuring because of temperature rise in the

also be considered [37].

Qualitative changes in soy protein

temperature heating are shown in table 4.

14

product must

during high

Page 25: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Tab

le4.

Cha

nges

inC

har

acte

rist

ics

of

Soyb

ean

Pro

tein

at

Hig

hT

empe

ratu

reH

eati

ng[2

9J

Tem

pera

ture

of

hea

tin

g(O

C)

100

105

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

cro

ss-s

trli

ctu

reo

fsu

buni

tsin

tact

1it

tle

degr

aded

..1*

deg

rad

ed

----

solu

bil

ity

rap

idde

cr-e

ase-

s--s

low

incr

ease

..I-ra

pid

incre

ase--

bind

ing

forc

e(d

egre

eo

fag

gre

gat

e)ra

pid

incr

-eas

e-s-

-elo

wd

ecre

ase

.1-ra

pid

decre

ase--

expa

nsio

np

rop

erty

incr

ease

....ra

p;d

decrease--------

tex

ture

hard

frag

ile

..,..so

ftela

stic

•to.

lik

eso

l-------

......

01

Page 26: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Chapter 3

THEORY

When a bulk polymer is crystallized in the absence of

external forces, there is no preferred orientation of

crystallites or molecules. Orientation, which is defined as

the degree of alignment of polymer chains in a particular

direction, is greatly influenced by deformation and

ternperature gradients in the system. As the polymer becomes

oriented, the mechanical and physical properties improve

[28,38].

3.1 Melt Transfor.ation Extrusion Process (MTE)

The MTE is a thermoforming process. The objective is to

deform a polymer melt, and to align the chains in a common

direction or directions. This process has advantages over

other orientation processes, since orientation is induced in

the molten state. In the molten state the deformation can be

quite influential; organization at all dimensional levels

can be affected either directly or indirectly: the basic

molecules, the aggregate-crystallite, the crystalline

amorphous entity, the single crystal lamella, and the larger

Page 27: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

1 7

aggregation, called spherulite [39]. The orientation due to

the deformation may be developed in glassy or amorphous

polymers, as well as in crystalline polymers. Since the

amorphous chains have not experienced crystallization, they

do not gain appreciable strength by orientation because they

fail by separation rather than by chain scission. In the

crystalline polymers, the crystallization is enhanced by

chain alignment.

3.1.1 Shear Stress and Flow Induced Crystallization

In the molten unoriented state, the linear molecules

are randomly coiled. Upon supercooling, the polymer tends to

crystallize and form spherulitic structures with no

macroscopic orientation (figure 2). The stacking of parallel

lamellae of the substructures produces a high local order

among the amorphous or disordered regions.

Flow induced crystallization and a shear field can

produce a high deformation. Mechanically, this causes the

forming lamellae to begin to slip from their originally

preferred alignment, such that the polymer axis becomes

a l i qned in the orienting direction. The extension due to

flow of the folded chains forms stacks of parallel lamellae

that can be either along or against the lamellae axis [40].

Figure 3 shows this behavior in a crystalline polymer.

Page 28: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Sphtrut,'icchoins folded atriQht anQ~ tomain alis

18

Defect, infibritt

Single .>crystalnucleus

AmorphousInter - spherulj,icmaterial

Amorphousintff- fibril tormaterial

Spheruli'e

Figure 2.

( a )

( b )

Structure of Spherulite [28J

~~---_.

Figure 3. Suggested Model for Fiber Formation(a) By unfolding of molecules from more

than one lamella,(b) By gradual chain-tilting, slip,

breaking off blocks of folded chains

Page 29: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

19

Upon approaching the entrance region of the die, the

velocity distribution of a molten polymeric material changes

to a "wine glass stem shape" (figure 4). The flow

streamlines converge rapidly inducing an elongational effect

of the previously random coiled polymer chain and giving a

higher degree of orientation [41-42]. The rate of uncoiling

of the polymer chains at the converging section depends on

the deformation ratio and the type of polymer processed

[43,44,48].

Previous work using plastics on the MTE process

describes the four important processing conditions which

contribute to the amount of orientation in the extrudate

[43,44,46-52]:

(1) die design and deformation ratio

(2) screw or line speed

(3) operating pressure

(4) temperature profile

The MTE process has been used with dies having reduction

ratios from 2:1 to 16:1, with half angles ranging from 10°

to 26°, and die geometries that deform the melt in either

uniaxial or biaxial directions. Furthermore, fiber, ribbon

and more complex dies have been used along with this process

[44,46-52]. Extrusion rates, controlled partially by screw

speed, govern the level of deformation on the polymer melt,

as well as the orientation.

Page 30: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

! , : 1 n (= 0 n f 0 rm d t ion

z

Flow streamlines

Crystal growth tr ontand i sot he rma 1 line

20

Figure 4. Elongational Flow in the "Wine Glass Stem"Region of a Converging Die

Page 31: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

21

3.1.2 Pressure Effect on Crystallization

As proposed by Brown [53], the development of the

extended chain crystals may be related to the formation of

the nematic Illiquid crystals." A nematic structure consists

of a parallel stacking of rods with relatively perfect

internal structure, but not necessarily matched from end to

end (figure 5). Collier postulated that a liquid crystalline

form could occur in the materials studied under critical

temperature, pressure, and field conditions [2]. This

behavior of different crystalline structures (polymorphism)

is not limited to the simpler polymers but is also observed

in proteins and synthetic polypeptides [54,55]. In the case

of synthetic polymers, the working pressure for MTE ranges

from 2000 to 8000 psi, which is 1/4-1/5 that of a solid

state extrusion [56].

Thermal properties

Earlier observations of oriented (extended) polymer

have shown a higher melting point than that of a random melt

(quiescent) [43.44,46-52]. In terms of entropy change,

( 2 )

The melting points are,

( 3 )

Page 32: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

(

( D

y

)-'2X

22

Figure 5. Nematic Liquid Crystalline Form

Page 33: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

23

( 4 )

where subscript f stands for fusion, q for quiescent, and ex

for extended.

As,

( 5 )

then,

Tm / Tm =6.5 / ~Sffex q q ex

from ( 2 ) ,

Tm / Tmq > 1 or T > Tmex mex q

Tm = Tm - Tmex q

( 6 )

( 7 )

( 8 )

Hence, the melting point of polymeric material is directly

related to its degree of orientation.

Page 34: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

3.2 Extrusion Cooking

Extrusion, in general, refers to the shaping of the

products to the desired size and consistency by forcing the

material through a die under a high pressure. Extrusion has

long been used in the food industry in the making of special

shapes of food products (e.g. macaroni, bacon bits).

Previous researchers have shown that the extrusion process

ca n produce mea t 1i ke fi ber s [14,31,57-61]. These repor ts

provide the "s t a t e of the a r t " of protein texturization by

using the extruder.

The basic patents of soy protein extrusion are those of

Atkinson [62] and Jenkins [35]. The newer patents, which

were an improvement over the prior patent, did not use a die

on the extruder and therefore had a lower pressure drop

(below 200 - 500 psi); the resultant product's characteris­

tics were less spongy, less hydrated, and more fibrous

[57-59].

Food extrusion owes much of its design and theory to

plastic science [37,42]. However, it should be noted that

there are differences between plastics as 'chemical',

artificial polymers and protein as "b t opol yme r s ! , natural

polymers. Zuilichem [63] explained these differences as:

1. Biopolymers shows no spontaneous melting-temperature or

trajectory but simply need a certain amount of shear to

Page 35: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

25

plasticize the protein-water mix.

2. The biopolymer is highly sensitive for a long time span

of exposure to heat and pressure.

3. It is important that some water be present during

extrusion to assure a continuous working condition of an

extruder.

The main components of a food extruder are the same as

those of a thermoplastic extruder. They are: feeder,

compression screw, barrel, d t e Ls ) , and heating system. In

this process, moistened products are plasticized in a tube

by a combination of heat, pressure, and mechanical shear.

Figure 8 shows the basic process in the food extruder

barrel, which i s divided into 3 stages: mixing and

compressing, heating and cooking.

DRIVE, GEARRE DUCER aTHRUST BEARING

\

FEEDHOPPER

FEED

SECTION

SCREW WITHINCREASING

ROOT DIAMETER

COOLINGWATERJACKET

THERMOCOUPLES

COMPRESSION METERING

SECTION SECTION

PRESSURETRANSDUCER

/ DIE

DISCHARGETHERMOCOUPLE

BREAKERPLATE

BARREL WITHHARDENED LINER

Figure 6. Cross Section of a typical food extruder [39]

Page 36: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

26

(1) Mixing and Co.pressing (feed zone)

The moi stened material enters the extruder through the

feed zone. The relatively free-flowing granular particles of

the meal cause a turbulent like pattern in the intake

section of the extruder. This flow insures intimate contact

of protein with water with very little internal shear of

food. Then the screw further compresses and mixes the

product. No cooking is desired in this zone [64].

(2) Heating (transition zone)

The second zone continues the mixing action, and

concomitantly imparts heat into the mixture due to shearing

action of the screw. This heat is used by the proteinaceous

material to coagulate and polymerize. This transition from

solid to a fluid is associated with a set of chemical

reaction called 'cooking'.

(3) Cooking (.etering section)

The meaning of cooking here is the conversion and/or

reaction of the major food constituents - carbohydrate, fat

protein, and water. Two types of cooking reactions which

occur with food biopolymers are protein denaturation

(section 2.2) and starch gelatinization. In these reactions,

water and food materials themselves interact to create new,

altered forms which have a distinctly different rheological

behavior. This cooking process is time and temperature

Page 37: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

the variables of extrusion processing

27

dependent, which probably changes with the concentration and

quantities of the chemical species present and the shear

environment. Food extrusion results in the chemical

alteration of the feed ingredients through the cooking and

texturizing process and in this respect is significantly

different from the melting processes, which occur during the

extrusion of thermoplastic resin. Thus, the application of

the words 'melt' or 'melting' is a misuse [39J.

Most of the cooking is done in this critical zone. The

cooking is mainly done by externally supplied and viscous

shear heat as the material is conveyed through the barrel to

the die. The highly turbulent flow pattern is transformed

into a laminar flow to minimize back flow across the protein

strands. At this stage the materials are simultaneously

oriented and coagulated in the direction of the chamber.

During this whole process, the viscocity and physical

properties of the dough can differ drastically. Information

about this is very limited. According to Briskey [65] and

Hermansson [66], the viscosity of the system changes with

the degree of protein hydration.

Therefore,

conditions are,

1. temperature profile

2. screw speed/line speed

3. design of die(s)

Page 38: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

28

4. moisture

5. pressure profile, and

6. residence time

3.3 Characteristics of textured protein products

A variety of tests have been used to characterize the

texture and other properties of textured protein products.

These tests are used to determine the effects of varying

extrusion conditions on product characteristics, and to

maintain quality standards for production runs. Comparison

of results from different investigations is difficult,

because no standard set of tests is used [37J.

Only two types of tests were possible in our

laboratory: bulk density and water absorption (hydration

value). Bulk density gives the degree of expansion of the

extruded dried products, while water absorption gives the

degree of po r o s i ty of the products' textures. Water

absorption is an important functional property of textured

protein products as the products are used after rehydration.

This value gives an indication of the extrudate maximum

absorption and retention capabilities. Hydration conditions

vary in different laboratories.

Page 39: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

29

3.4 Response Surface Analysis (RSA)

It is convenient to visualize geometrically the

relation between response and the various factor levels. RSA

method represents the response by assuming that when k

factors ( or independent variables, exist in an

experiment, the response (or dependent variables) will be a

function of the levels at which these factors are combined

[61].

( 10 )

The function ~ is called the response function.

The response surface is represented by a polynomial.

For the case of three variables, a quadratic polynomial was

proven adequate to fit the data [3-5]. The model is,

( 11 )

The above equation takes into account variations due to

first and second degree as

i nt e'r act ion s •

well as those due to

Response of the independent variables in a certain

region is represented by contours. These surface contours

are obtained by making one variable equal to a constant

Page 40: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

30

value and then solving the fitted equation as a quadratic

equation in the other two.

The application of this method in food industry is

quite popular [3,45,68].

Page 41: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Chapter 4

DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL

A. Extruder

A laboratory single-screw extruder, C.W.

Brabender, Model 200, had the following

specifications: barrel diameter - 0.75 11; LID 20:1;

feed hopper gravity feed; heating 2 zone

electric heaters, independently controlled by 800

watt heaters monitored by two West Model JPC

on-off proportional controllers; drive unit

variable speed motor assembly, equipped with a

tachometer, and capable of controlling screw speed

from 0-200 RPM. The discharge pressure was

indicated on a West Model 1586 pressure indicator

with a range of a to 10,000 psi. The motor speed

was controlled by a Fincor 2400 MKII DC Motor

Controller, manufactured by INCOM, International

Inc.

B. Extruder Screw

The screw used was made of 4140 chrome alloy with

a standard compression ratio of 2:1. It had 20

flights with increasing screw root diameter from

0.475" to 0.605 11 with a 0.608" axial channel width

Page 42: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

32

and a 0.007 11 flight clearance. Angle of the

helical screw was 25°.

c. A Melt Conditioning Pipe

as a connection between the

(medium pressure-lO,OOO psi)

insidediameter and 0.687"

A 15 11 length pipe

barrel and the die •

with 111 outside

diameter was used

..;

D. Extruder Dies

The dies were made of 304 stainless steel:

(a) A split die with a uniaxial deformation ratio

of 6:1 was used. The die opening consisted of

a slit 1/16 11 thick and 1/2 11 wide which

produced a tape or ribbon like extrudate.

(b) A fiber die with a circular opening of 0.020"

diameter and 111 length was also used. This die

was fitted to a holder and produced a

string-like extrudate.

Each of the above dies produced a vertical,

downward extrusion and were heated with fitted 600

watt heaters controlled automatically from the

control board. Figures 7 - 10 show the designs,

dimensions, and views of the dies.

Page 43: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

o•

-1/16" 1/2"J

L--- -2 1/4"-----­3/16"

---------3 1/2 ..-------......

33

Figure 7 . Schematic Diagram for(A) Side view, and (B)

the Uniaxial-ribbonTop view

Die

Page 44: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

34

-CD~,

\9I

•"10J QJ

..c:-4->

S-o4-

Ertj

S-O)

rtj

0

U QJ.,.... .,....-4->0rtj

E S-QJ Q)

..c: ..0u·,....

U1 u,

co

QJ

S-~

0)

lJ......

4.

..........t:-:-:-:·:-:-:-:·............................t::::::::::::::::~:.

4 8 /~ 1--.II

~

f ",...

='""-....

::::::::::::::::~

-+-- 9 /1.--+It

r ~

r~:::::::::::::::

f- ~::::::::::::~

=- =N .. •"' " ",... ....

PI)

r- ~:::::::::::::::i ,.... IL

r'i"••••••, ••••••••

1:::::::::::::::::Il

.~

--It)

Page 45: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Figure 9. Photograph of Uniaxial Die Halves

Figure 10. Photograph of Fiber Die Pieces

35

Page 46: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

36

E. Controllers

Two of the three Gardsman temperature control

units manufactured by West Instrument Corporation

were used to control temperatures in the barrel.

They had a range of Q-800oF (425°C). The tem­

peratures in the piping and the dies were

controlled with two Love Model 52 controllers

mounted on the control board. They had a range up

to 400 oC. Temperatures and pressures in the barrel

and the die were sensed by Dynisco strain gauges,

r~1 0 del TPT43 2A-I QM- 6 / 18 , and measur e d byaWest

Model 15-86 and a Dynisco Model ER 478Al pressure

gauges.

F. Optical Microscope

A Wild M5A Stereomicroscope was used for

texture observations i n the 1abora tory. The

overall magnification range was 1.4X to 20QX,

depending on the optical combination.

Photomicrographs of the structure were taken by

MPS15/11 Semiphotomat (632.8 mm) assembled on the

M5A Stereomicroscope using a 35 mm film (ASA

400/DIN 27).

G. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)

A Hitachi Model HHS-2R Scanning Electron

Page 47: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

37

Microscope was used to photograph the sample on

positive/negative black and white Polaroid film,

type 665 (ASA 75/DIN 20). The SEM is capable of

viewing three-dimensional structures over a range

of 20-280,000 magnification.

H. Sputter Coater

Prior to SEM examination, the samples were

coated with gold or gold/palladium deposition in a

Hummer V sputter coater, manufactured by Technics.

I. Differential Scanning Calorimeter

A Perkin-Elmer, Model DSC-1B differential

scanning calorimeter was used to detect the

melting point of soy protein. This equipment was

connected to a Perkin-Elmer, Model 56 chart

recorder to plot the rate of heat input versus

temperature.

J. Soybean

Defatted Soybean protein concentrate, PROCON

2000, was obtained from A.E. Staley, Mfg. Co.,

Decatur, 11. It contained 70% protein on a dry

solid basis and 5-7% moisture.

Page 48: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Tacla

•••t

.r

Zon

l4

Zo

ne

3

r--------

Pr•

••ur

.-T.

.p

.rat

urt

,G

auae

~

Zon

e2

Zon

f1

o

I8

ar

r•

Ile

on

dIt

Ion

.r

Z0

ne

1-D

ie~

Fig

ure

11

.S

chem

atic

Dia

gram

for

the

Ex

tru

sio

nP

roce

ssw

ith

aC

on

dit

ion

erZ

one

w cc

Page 49: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

c:o.,...

OJ..s::+->4-o

.,...:>

Q)

S­::s0')

u,

39

Page 50: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Chapter 5

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

All the samples tested in this investigation were

prepared by extruding premoist soybean flour in a C.W.

Brabender laboratory extruder, Model 200. To complete the

screw assembly, a conditioner zone (18" spacer) was placed

between the die plate and the barrel, which provided

additional volume after extruder screw discharge. Previous

workers proved that the conditioning zone improved pressure

uniformity behind the die plate, increased the residence

time of the material in the extruder, and improved

crystallization [51,52].

All compression fittings in the assembly line were

torqued to 75 ft-lb (figures 11 and 12). Prior to setting

up, the die channels were cleaned from old polymer by

sanding with 600 grit sandpaper. The ribbon die halves were

assembled with six 0.25" X 2.5 11 grade eight socket head cap

screws, which then were torqued to 90 ft-lb. All

t he r mo coupl e s , transducers were tightened to prevent any

leaking during operation.

Independent variables selected for the process were

temperature, feed moisture and screw speed. The selection of

these critical variables were based on findings reported by

previous researchers and through preliminary experimentation

Page 51: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

41

[14,31,59-63]. The dependent variables are pressure profile

and line speed.

6.1 Preliminary experi.entation

The first objective was to find the best temperature

profile and processing conditions. The extrusion assembly

was divided into 5 temperature zones: I and II - the barrel,

III and IV - the conditioner zone, and V - the die (figure

11). Through preliminary experimentation, it was necessary

to force feed the material through the hopper. The premoist

soybean was ground by the screw and pushed back into the

feed hopper. Because of the considerable amount of steam

generated, the soybean developed a tacky consistency and

clogged the feed inlet. This effect was reduced by not

heating the section nearest to the hopper. If this section

were heated, the steam would be absorbed by the incoming soy

material. The steam caused caking and made smooth operation

impossible.

The temperature settings for the assembly were

determined by careful observation of extrudate quality. A

decreasing temperature distribution toward the die was a

better choice than that of an increasing temperature

distribution. The former case had two advantages:

Page 52: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

42

(a) Most of the cooking was done in the barrel zone. A

decreasing temperature distribution prevented de­

gradation of the material.

(b) The material did not extrude at too high a

temperature in the die. Excessive expansion caused

by flashing steam could destroy or seriously limit

the formation of the fibrous structure, however, a

certain amount of expansion of the product was also

important in order to obtain a fibrous structure.

In the past, a steep temperature gradi ent was appl ied

to enhance and freeze the highly oriented extrudate

[48,51,52]. This was usually done by immersing the tip of

the die in a water bath as a cooling medium, which also

caused the pressure to build up. In this study, the effects

of the die land temperature gradient were not observed to

occur.

The die temperature was heated to SOOC, since a lower

temperature caused the material to stop flowing out of the

die passage. Too high a temperature (100°C) at the die made

the product emit separated bursts of burnt individual

pieces. It appeared that some pieces would stick in the die

nozzle until the pressure built up sufficiently to dislodge

them. The material near the end of the die expanded rapidly,

producing a rapid outflowing of material which fragmented

into individual pieces. This product was unassayable.

Page 53: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

43

Once particular processing temperatures were set, a

series of experiments with the same temperature setting were

conducted. This reduced excessive use of raw material during

the transition periods to a new temperature settings.

Since the extruder was not self emptying, too little

moisture, too high a temperature, and too high a compression

ratio were all avoided because any of these would cause the

materials remaining in the barrel to harden and lock the

screw [69]. A blocked extruder, due to overheating or high

frictional drag of the product, costs a considerable amount

of maintenance time for dismantling, cleaning and repair.

An experimental design was chosen with three levels of

temperature, three levels of moisture and four levels of

screw speed to allow estimation of second order effects in

the empirical statistical model for three independent

variables (table 5).

Page 54: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Tab

le5.

Exp

erim

enta

lP

atte

rno

fP

roce

ssin

gC

ondi

tion

Cod

es

Pro

cess

ing

tem

pera

ture

pro

file

,Zo

nes

II-

III

-IV

(OC)

M0

istu

re

wlo 30 35 40

140

-11

590

RP

M

4060

8010

0

Al

A2A3

A4

B182

8384

C1C2

C3C4

150

-12

5-

100

RP

~1

4060

8010

0

0102

0304

E1E2

E3E4

F1F2

F3F4

160

-13

5-

110

RP

M

4060

8010

0

G1G2

G3G4

HIH2

H3H4

II12

1314

Not

e:Th

ete

mpe

ratu

reat

zone

sI

and

Vw

ere

unhe

ated

and

50°C

,re

spec

tiv

ely

~ +::at

Page 55: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

45

6.2 Experi.entation

DRY a WET SOLID - LIQUID........

INGREDIENTS BLENDER

AFTERDRYER .... EXTRUDER. .-.... ,

Figure 13. Simplified extrusion flow sheet

Figure 13 shows a simplified flowsheet. Moisture was

added to the soybean meal prior to extrusion because the

residual moisture content of the meal after oil extraction

is normally very low (5-7 weight percent or w/o) [69]. As

the present design did not allow direct water addition in

the extruder, a food processor was used for moistening the

powder. In order to have a uniform product, a food processor

was used to mix the dry flour with water. Distilled water

was added slowly along with the continuous mixing and

breaking action of the steel blade, so that it maintained a

free fl owi ng movement of powder to prevent the development

of large aggregates. Water addition was accomplished in 3-5

Page 56: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

46

minutes and mixing ceased after an additional 3 minutes.

Batch sizes were normally about 300 grams of dry blend.

Once the temperature settings on the extrusion system

were reached, the motor was turned on and the screw speed

was adjusted to achieve the desired tachometer setting. Then

the hopper was fed with premo;stened soybean meal. In order

to achieve a continuous feeding, the mix was hand-fed to the

extruder hopper. An excessive amount of mix in the hopper

prevented free flow of the material into the extruder

because of caking or bridging of ingredients in the feed

hopper.

Sufficient time (20-30 minutes) was allowed in order to

have a steady state system. Estimation of the steady state

was based on the temperature and pressure readings. After

enough material at each shear rate had been produced (.!.15

feet), the screw speed was changed to another desired shear

rate. Elapsed time was allowed for the transition period (20

minutes).

Data collected consisted of the steady state values of

temperatures in all zones in degree Celsius, pressure at the

exit of the barrel, pressure at the die in psi, and

extrusion rate in in/min. Table 5 shows the variations of

variables selected.

Extruded samples were collected, placed in sealed

plastic bags, labeled with the extruder run codes and

refrigerated.

Page 57: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

47

The second objective was to analyze the effect of using

higher pressure conditioning. Higher pressure drop at the

die was attempted. This was done by replacing the ribbon die

with a fiber die. Temperature profile chosen was unheated­

160-135-10Q-50oC and screw speed of 40, 60, 80 and 100 rpm.

c. Speci.en Testings

All the samples were photographed and tested for

moisture absorption capacity, bulk density and thickness. It

was necessary to examine the specimens as soon as possible

because the extrudates will not remain fresh due to

microbial and enzyme action. Under refrigerated conditions

the material lasted only for 2-3 weeks.

Water absorption capacity was evaluated by soaking 50

grams of extrudate segments in a beaker filled with 200 ml

water. After 15 minutes of rehydration, the excess water was

removed by draining with a tea strainer for 15 seconds.

Afterwards, the sample was reweighed. The percent water

absorption was calculated as the percentage weight increased

based on the dry weight.

Bulk density was determined by weighing 12-in long

extrudate. The volume was obtained by multiplying the length

by average width and thickness. Average degree of puffing

was 40.8S; puffing is defined as the degree of extrudate's

Page 58: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

into two

Electron

studies

because

divided

Scanning

microscopic

extruded,

48

volume expansion due to pressure drop and flashing of the

water vapor. The product density was obtained by dividing

the weight by the calculated volume.

Microscopic Examinations were

stages, optical microscopic and

f4 i c r 0 9 rap h s (S EM). Sam p1e s for 0 ptic a 1

were taken immediately after they were

they were still moist and easy to layer.

Preparing samples for SEM was more complicated than for

the optical microscope. However, only a small area of the

sample can be viewed at one time. The samples obtained

during the extrusion were frozen in liquid nitrogen. Samples

for SEM were placed onto a specimen stub covered with

double-coated cellulose adhesive tape. The area around the

specimen was coated with a small streak of silver conductive

paint in order to minimize charge build-up from the primary

electron beam. Afterwards, the specimens were coated with

gold-palladium (60:40) in a sputter coater. The coated

specimens were examined in a Hitachi scanning electron

microscope, Model HHS-2R. The photographs were taken on

positive/negative black and white Polaroid film (ASA 75/DIN

20) •

Differential Scanning Calorimeter (OSe). Samples

were cut into thin pieces and weighed to the nearest tenth

of a milligram. They weighed approximately 5-15 milligrams.

Then they were sealed into specially designed aluminum pans

Page 59: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

49

supplied by Perkin-Elmer and placed on the Perkin-Elmer DSC

unit. The instrument was calibrated with a standard heavy

Indium sample (163.S oC melting point) at 20°C/min and a full

scale deflection of eight millicalories. The recorder was

set at a full scale range of five millivolts and the chart

speed was set at 40 rom/min.

Statistical Design. The data were analyzed by means

of a stepwise multiple regression. The analyses were

performed using the extrudate characteristics as dependent

variable versus the processing temperature, screw speed, and

moisture. All possible subsets of the regression were

performed using the SAS package [70]. Then, response surface

plots were made from the derived regression equations.

Page 60: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Chapter 6

RESULTS

A series of experiments was conducted according to the

above design. The intent was to investigate the effect of

independent process variables upon dependent variables. The

protein concentrates used on all runs were assumed to

contain 5% moisture prior to any water addition.

The results of response surface analysis are tabulated

in tables 11 and 12 in Appendix C. The response surface

plots include all the experimental design data and the

predicted data. These plots illustrate the contour of the

dependent variable against two of the independent variables,

while setting one of the variables constant. Response

analysis usually predicts the area with optimum response,

e.g. highest output, highest absorption rates, etc. The

shape of the optimum, the "center of the sy s t e ra'", can be a

maximum, minimum, or a mix of the two, a "saddle point". The

results of the dependent variables of this study show a

"saddle po i nt " which implies the existence of two distinct

regions of maximum yield a two peak system (figures 23, 29,

and 32). The area of the two peak system means that there

are two maximum peaks in the system. Sometimes the center of

this area is found outside the experimental design. The

surface in this region of the experiments represents either

Page 61: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

51

an inclined ridge or an inclined trough.

The effects of screw speed on extrusion rate or

volumetric flow rate was primarily a function of screw

speed. Figures 14 and 15 show the trends at different

moisture contents and process t emp e r a t ur e s , respectively.

Moisture content effects were more significant than that of

processing temperature. Higher moisture content produced

caking of the material t reducing output rate. Process

temperature effects were more dramatic at lower screw speed

and leveled off at higher screw speed. Effects of all the

three processing variables are represented by the response

surface plots in figures 16 and 17. For e xamp l e , in figure

16, the effect of screw speed and moisture on the extrusion

rate at a constant temperature is represented by five

symbols. The darkest symbols, at the upper left of the

figure with a value of 62.18 to 69.53 inches per mi nut e ,

represents the highest value range of extrusion rate shown

in this figure. The value occured at a screw speed of 90 to

100 RPM at a moisture content of 20 to 22.5 weight percent.

Decreasing extrusion rates are represented by the other

symbols along contour lines, at roughly 15 inches per minute

interval.

Figures 18 and 19 depict the pressure profile at the

die versus screw speeds. This pressure was an indication of

how much energy was required to force the material out of

the die orifice. To overcome high frictional forces in the

Page 62: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

52

20 40 80 80SCREW SPEED (Rpm)

OJs;:::::sen

L.L..

Vl:::::ss;~

xw

Vl::::sVls;Q)

>Q)

~

res0:::

c:o

3:OJs,u

V>

o::::

(J-a:...LLI:2::)..Jo>

-0Q)Q)

0­Vl

Vl~c:OJ~

c:ouOJs;

,..... ::::s.. ~

:a: Vl

"­",c-

D

...

.

.

RUNS. ZONE II .

0 ...!L '30%

A H 35%---8 I 40%.........

o

19

41

15

"'­c:

zo-(/)

Ja:t­)(

I&J

....-..-c:-

Page 63: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

U1

W

-.....

LaJ ... 4(

8:

~~ o .J &

I.,...

a- X , IQc: -

50 o C I­ &&

IZ J ..

J o >10

10

08

0

14

0·C

Ieo·

c

16

0·C

ZO

NE

II

Fc

RU

NS

o o C:i

60 (R

pm

)

o 40

SCRE

WSP

EE

D2.

0I

I

-----0 J

.....-

---8

.,..",.

""'-

I----

---",

,---

...A

"",

../

.....

//

a.

./

./'

.[]

/'

.A

/'

••••

•~

~/

...~

/.

~..

/.

/...

/.

/'

./

../'

"...

../

.../

.../

../

.,/

~...

/...

/....

/.

/..

/.

../

...../'

./

./

...../

....../

.....r

»:

01

·····F;

gure

15.

Ext

rusi

onR

ate

vers

usSc

rew

Spee

dat

0;ff

eren

tP

roce

ss;n

gT

empe

ratu

res

....

5

30

z o iii J .: l­ X &II

11.I ... C a:....,

,...

&: - 2 '-- a:

Page 64: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

54

Cn~!TOlJR PLOT OF SCREW SPE:::" (Pf"'~) "'.Jf' MrtsT'JPF: (~'/Q)CO~JTOURS AF<F EX""RU5JQf'~ r-~T~C:: (rN/~rN)

c~t'JTrlJR PLC~ l'F X2*X3

t 1) +

I

F') +J

1

90 +

I

1 J) +,l

IJIK~" ,.F8F8~@~e

R•• . PFpe?Q8A XXXXXXXXXXXX ~~+++++++++++

.~ ~@pe6~eA~ XXXXXXXXXXXX. ++++~++~+ ........ ++" FRcPT?€ee€ XXXXXXXXXXYX ++++++++++++++~ ~~FGS~~B~ xxxxxxyxxx~xx +++++++++++++++~FP8~~8Q xxxxxxxxxxxxx ++++++++++++++++

~~F@~P~P~ 'XYY~XXXYXXXX +++++++++++++++++~FGFPQe~ XXXXXXXXXXXX +++++++~++++++++++

~8e~eQFQ_XXXXXXXXXYXX +++++++++++++++++++~PP~A.XXXXXXXXXXYX++++++++++++++++++++rF~~~P XXXXXXXXXXXX. ++++++++++++++++++++8e-ef:lE- \ '( XX X X X X XX X X ~ ++ .. +++ ++ +++ ...~~FP~ X~XXXXXXXXXX ++++++++++++++++++++++PA8~ ..XX~XXXXXXXX +++++++++++++++~+++++++

~F yxyx~x>:xxxx ++++ ...++ .... ++++++ ...++ .....+++++ H~ xxy~XXXXYX +++++++++++++++++++++++.1 4;, X)(XXXXXXXX. ++ .....++ ...~++++++++++ ...++++ •••

I 8 .. XXXXXYXXXXX +++++++++++++++++++++X X X '<X )( ~)( X)(." ++ ++++ + +++ + ++ + ++ ++ + + +~XX~~X~XXX ++++++++++++++++++++

~ XX~X~xXXX +++++++++++++++++++ ••••••••••

I XXXX~X~X, +++++++++++++++++~ ••••••••••••~X~XXXX.~++++++++++++++++++

~y~XXX ~+++++++++++++++++

, XXXXX ++++++++.+++++++++ ••••••••••••••••+ ~x~x+++++++++++++++++ ••••••••••••••••••

t~XX ++~+++++++.+~++++ •••••••••••••••••••xx +++++++++++++++~ ••••••••••••••••••••X +++++++++++++++.••••••••••••••••••••••

·1 X ++++.++++++++++ •••••••••••••••••••••••+ +++++++++++++++ ••••••••••••• ~ ••••••••••-----+------+------+------+------+------.----------

~J.0 ~~.5 27.0 30.~ ~4.J 3~.5

4:>

7J

5

~...

p

y

••••••++++ ......XXXYXXPFRQSe

IO.72 L58

18.0 7492

:12. 7755 ~

47."-7626

18.074t:;232.775:5947.47E?6(,2.17()q~....... 62. 1 7(,C)~ (.,Q .52 7 2 ( )

Figure 16. The Effect of Screw Speed and Moisture on theExtrusion Rate at a Constant Processing Temperatureof 150-125-100-50°C.

Page 65: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

55

CONl"OUR PLOT OF TEMPERATURE (e) AND MOISTtfAE. CONTeNT (W/O)CONTOURS ARe E>eTRlIsrON RATES (IN/MIN)

CONTOUR PLOT a~ Xl*~3

_K.~ FPPF~~P XYXXXXXXXY ++++++++++++++++~~_ PFF~~g~ xx~~~xxxx ~+++++++++++++.+ ••~~ ~papeF-F-~ .xx.xXXXXYX>'~+"'''''"+",~+,,+++,,,+ ••••~ FQFEE8E XXYXXXYXX ++++++++++++++ •••••

. FP~~8~ XXXXXXXXy +++++++++++++~•••••••RER~~8, ~,~X)(XXXXXX ++ .... ++ ... +++++++ ••••••••

Q8ee~F~ xxx~yxxxx +++++++++++++ •••••••••P~A~PR XXXX~YXXX. +++++++~+++~+ ••••••••••8~F:.::.P~· y.xxXy)(XX)(X ++++++ + ++ .AQ~~O .xxxxxxxx~ ~+.+++++++++ ••••••••••••~~Q., )<XX)(XXXXX +++++++++++-+ •••••••••••••Ae8~ )(X)'XXXXXX +f-++++++++++ •••••••••••••~FF ~x~xxxxx~ ~++++++++++++ •••••••••••••P8F xxxxxxxxx ++++++++++++&~&, ~xxxxxxxx ++~++.++++++

~8 ~~xxxxxxxx +~++++++++++

F~ X '< 't( x )C xxx X' + ++ + + + .. + ....... + +- ..~Q xxxxx~xxx +++++++++++++~~ xxxXXXXXX +-++++++~+~+++

F~~~~~YXXX~X ++++++++++++++ •••••••••••••~ XXXYXXXXXX +++++~+++~++++ •••••••••••••F_ ~xv~xxxxxx +++++++++++++++ ••••••••••••F .xx~xxxxxxx ++~++++++++++++ ••••••••••••F. '<XXX)(XXXXX +++++.+++++++-+++~ •••••••••••A& . Y ~ x y x x >: x~: ++ + ..... + + + + .. + ......... -t.+ ... +- • • • • • • • • •~F XX~XXXXYYX ++++++++++++++~+++

XXY~XXXYXv. ++++++++++~+~~++++++

pc ~~xYXXYXXYX ++++++++.+++++++++++++PFP xxx>:xxxxxx ,++~++++++++++...++++ .... +++++++FF.p., XXXXXXYXXXX +++++ ++++++++++++++++++++P~~Q XYXXXY~XXXX.++++++++++++++++++++++++

p~p~ ~XXYXXY~XX~X,++++~++~+++++++++++++++

1 /-J. .J. \J + F;:'~~'::' .. X)~ Xx)')( x X X X V. X , + + .......+- + +... + + ...+- + + .......... + + + .-,-----+------+------~------+------.------+----------

~0.J ?'.~ 2 7 . ) 3).5 34.0 ?7.S

I1 c. .)• ;..; +

,15 7.5 +

IlSS.J +,,. IE

1'\ IS? r; +p I-;R r

f. lr;).J +T

IuR •E 1 t. 7 • 5 +

I14r:;.J +

14?C-: +,II

MOl STU~E

...... ;' I, • J? ~ c: ~.,~. tJ~R~.?

x'Xxx~x

EEdFF€? r;. r'J2 Rf...·?4'":9 •.~:_:4i)(J

4-;. ?~4)(~~·~.7::t"'0

6c;.6QIQl

Figure 17. The Effect of Processing Temperature and Moistureon Extrusion Rate at a Constant Screw Speed of70 RPM.

Page 66: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

••...•

••..••

...•.•

··M.••

..•••••

••

..

f

~••

••••

•"""'M

'?1

............

·········t

~. ...

....

...

-----!----------~I

--....

........

..--.

<,

~"

/"

'~-

........

.. ----

---

.-..­

.....

'1' £

--------

1300

....-- ~ ..., ..., tI: ::) en (I)

LLt

g:

A.

&LI - Q

70

0

20

40

60

J8

0--

--~--~IO()

SCRE

WSP

EE

D(R

pm

)

RU

NS

ZO

NE

IIFi

gure

18.

Die

Pre

ssu

rev

ersu

sSc

rew

Spee

dat

Diff

eren

tP

roce

ssin

gT

empe

ratu

res

0A

14

0·C

A0

ISO

·C-_

.......

G1

60

·C(J

"1

~0

"\'...

......

......

..

Page 67: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

I,

~.:

..

~

o•

57

......,ccuS­cu4­4-

"'0cucuc..

V1

~cuS­U

V')

til::::stil (/)S-~cu c:>cu~

cu c:S- 0::::sutil(/) cucu S­S- ~a......,

(/)cu.,...

',... 0C):E

ooIt)-

ooIf)- (I lei) lynSS3Yd 310

ooM)

.,...u,

Page 68: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

58

die land of the fiber die, pressure was increased to one and

a half times that of the ribbon die (figure 20). Pressure

variance was graphically represented with a 90% confidence

limit. Response surface plots for the die pressure are on

figure 21-23.

A differential scanning calorimeter was used to detect

the melting point and heat of fusion. The DSC was

standardized using an Indium sample. The peak melting point

occured at 430 oK, which depressed the actual melting point

(163.S oC) by 4% (figure 24).

Figure 25 shows the typical DSC scanning for the

extruded protein product. Mel ting point did not occur and

the decreasing curve indicated that the tested material

experienced an endothermic reaction. This behavior will be

further discussed in the next chapter.

Figures 26-28 represent the correlations of extrusion

parameters with product absorptions, or water retention

value. The increase in water uptake implies that more water

penetrated the structure. This is an important value because

commercial texturized vegetable protein products are

rehydrated prior to use, and rehydration characteristics of

the cooked food is also important for digestion.

Furthermore, the extrusion processing conditions influenced

the protein to restructure and reduce its solubility.

Bulk density of the dried extruded soy protein product

indicated the degree of product expansion. This exothermic

Page 69: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

1600

'(

15

00

........ ... • Q. ....., I.IJ~ J CD en w ~ A

. w - o 10

00

20

40

60

80

SC

RE

WS

PE

ED

(Rp

m)

100

Figu

re20

.D

ieP

ress

ure

vers

usSc

rew

Spee

dfo

rth

eF

iber

Die

Run

s(J

1

1...0

Page 70: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

60

ceNTOUR PLOT CF SCPEW jf'P:£:O (Pr'M) 'IS. '''O''~T1JQE: CONT~"'JT ("'/0)CONTnups ~RE OlE PPESSUPF5 (n)I~)

CCNTOUR ~LDT ~F XZ*X3

....

Feese xx~xx~ +++++++++ ••••••••••••••••••~eEA_ x~~x~xx +++++++++ ••••••••••••••••••€~~e, ~X)(XXXX ......... +.......... ++ •••••••••••••••••APSeeq ~~xxx~ +++++++++ •••••••••••••••••eaeeq xxxxxx ~+++~+++••••••••••••••••••G86ee xxxxxx +++++++++ •••••••••••••••••~8R ~xxxxx ++++++~+++•••••••••••••••••~AESe ~xxxxx ++++++++++ ••••••••••••••••e~ee xxxxxx, .... +++++.++ ••••••••••••••••

e~p@e xxxxxxx +++.+++++ ••••••••••••••••e@ee.~XXXXXX +++++++++ ••••••••••••••••

ee xxxxxx +++++++++ ••••••••••••••••Q68S8 XXXXXX •• +++++++ee~Re xx~xxx .+ ... +++++++ •••••••••••••••ee~A xxxxxx +++~++++++ •••••••••••••••f'ee~ 't x )( x~ x, + + ...+ ... + +-+ + .... • ••••••••••••••seese xxxxxx .+++++~+++ •••••••••••••••qEee~ xxxxxxx ++.++++++ •••••••••••••••

JI 86A8. XXXXXXX ++++ ..++++ •••••••••••••••~QI ... A-8e~ '. )( xx xxxx ............ + +... ....... • ••••••••••••••w see xxxxxxx ++++++++++ ••••••••••••••••• eeee~ xxxxxx ++++++ .... ++ ••••••••••••••••RR eAee~ xxxxxx ++.+++++++ ••••••••••••••~. eeeee x xxx xx: ++++++++++ ••••••••••••••3tI eee€e xxxxxx ++++++++++ •••••••••••••••• seeSE XXXXXX ++++++++++ •••••••••••••••• eeees xxxx~x ++++++++~••••••••••••••••• eS8 _XXXx.xx + .... ++++++.f. ••••••••••••••~. EA8€ XXXXX ++++++++++ ••••••••••••••KR seeee xxxxx •• +++++ .... + ••••••••••••••

.. II. ~ege XXXXXX ++++++ ...+++ ••••••••••••••----+------+-----+----_.+------+------+----------

2J.0 23.5 27.) '0.5 ~4.J '7.~

...

I+

I

70

80

6J

40

50

+

I-+

I90 +

I..I

110

100

5CREW

5pEED

~(j!STupe:

sv ~8CL y

•••••• .334.7247 t=JQ7.9039+++ ........ 6'J7.9039 14.24.2A24

XXXXXX 1424.2624 ~lS0.6:~Jqg~ee~q 21~J.620Q 287f1.9794

~~JlC4"~ 2a7~.97q4 3240.t58';

Figure 2 1. The Effect of Screw Speed and Moisture on theDie Pressure at a.Constant Processing Temperatureof 152.8°C (Zone II ~

Page 71: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

61

CONTOUP PLOT CF Tp:,JPf':"pATUnE r r j VS. r··OT~TlJPr CCNTE~~T ('1J/O)cnNTPUn~ ARF OYE PRESSUR~S (PSI~)

crr~'TOU~ PLOT or xt*X3

+++++~++~ ••••••••••••••••+++++++++ ••••••••••••••••+++++++.~ ••••••••••••••••++++~+++~ ••••••••••••••••+++++~+++ ••••••••••••••••++++.+++~ ••••••••••••••••+++++++.+ ••••••••••••••••+++++++++ ••••••••••••••••+++++++++ ••••••••••••••••+++++++++ ••••••••••••••••+++++++++ ••••••••••••••••+++++++++ ••••••••••••••••+++++++++ ••• 4 ••••••••••••

+++++++++ ••••••••••••••••++++++++++ •••••••••••••••++++++++++ •••••••••••••••+~++++++++ •••••••••••••••+~+++++~++ •••••••••••••••++++++++++ •••••••••••••••++++++++++ •••••••••••••••

+++++++++++++••++++ ••••••••••••••+++++++~++ ••••••••••••••.+++++++++ ••••••••••••••++++++++++ ••••••••••••••... ++++++++++++++++++++ •••••••••••••++++++~+++ •••••••••••••++++++++++ •••••••••••••+++++~+++.+ ••••••••••••+++++++++++ ••••••••••••++++++ •• +++ ••••••••••••++++++++++++ ••••••••••••

)(~XXXXXX

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

eeEEA XXXXY)(XXFP.F~RC XXXXXXXAFeP~ )(XXXXXX~F~8F XXXXXXX8E8~f? XXXXXX138R.. XXXXXXXee-8AP )(XXYXXXeefJ4=F XXXYX)(XR989E XXXYXXX8~qF XXXXXXX@BSRE; XXXXX.XX

.8F-Pf? XXXXXXXsees xxxxxxx.espp .. XXXXXXXERees xxxxxx8E1S@'8 XXX)(XXFge-AE X )( X.X xx~epee XXXXYXEeRP@ XXXXXXXFeess xxxxxxx

• eSReP XXXXXXX•• 6PS8E? XX)fXXX•• _sespp ,XX)(XXX•• f:Fl8Eq )(XXXXX•• 8RPRP XXXXXX• a ee8B6 XXXXXXX8G1 986S6 XXX')(XXX•• ~Re8F Xyyxxxx.• a PP8EE:XXXXXXX.•• ~eeRe x xxx x x:

I+

I+

J+

J+

I+

I+

I+

t+

J+1-----+------+------+------~------~------+---------

20.0 ?3.~ 2~.~ 3J.~ '4.0 3~.5

140.v

147.5

145.0

142.5

150.0

160.0

1'55.0

157.5

152.5

Tc=

MPEpATURE

SYMBOL y

•••••• 401.7417 795.1 r;11++++++ 795.1511 1581.9699

xxxxxx 1 ~81. QF1<:lq 2.36~.-':.1e7

PR8~P5 2.368.7887 ~1:;r:;.6'7~

.a"C'-~ ~155.6075 3549.0169

Figure 22. The Effect of Temperature and Moisture on theDie Pressure at a Constant Screw Speed of 45 RPM

Page 72: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

160.0

157.5

155.0

TEM 152.5pER~ 150.0T

tJ~- 147.5

14.5.Q

142.5

140.0

62

CONTOtff-l PLnT r;r Tcr~pF:f'''T(JP~ VS. SCREW SPEEr)CCNTCURS ~F:'~ nYE Dpr-:-SStJ~ES

C~NTClJR PLO T OF Xl")( 2

I+XXXXXX)(XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX;<XXXXXX ' .+-fa .

t

~~~~xx~x~~~xxxxxxx~~~~xxx~xxx . ++ •• + ... + ~+++~~~xx~~x~XXXXXXX~X~X~)XXX ++++ ...++++++ ••• ++++.~X~XXX~X~XXXXXXXXXXX~ +++ •• +++++++.~+.+++++++

+~x~xxx~x~~~xxxx~ .+++++++++++++++++++++++++ ••

t~~xx~x~x~ ++++++++++~+++++~.++++~+++++~ •••

• +++++.+++++++.+++~++++ •••+ •• ++++.~+++ •••••+++++.++++ •• ++ •• +++++.++++++++++++++++++~+••••••

+++++++++++++.+++ •• +.++~+++++~+.+.+.++.~~+ •••••••

I.++.+++++.+++++++++++++++++++++.+++~++.+ ••••••••++~++••• ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ••• ++ •••••••••+.++++.+++.+++++~++++++.++++~+++.++++++•••••••••

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ••••••••••

I.. +~++++++.+++++++++~++++++++++++++++++ •••••••••+++++++++++++.++++++.+++++++~~++++++.++•••••••••+++++++++++++++.++++++++++++++++++++++++ ••••••••

+.+.+++.++ ••++++++++.+++++++++++++.++++.+~•••••••

1++ •• ++++++++++++++++~~+.+++++++~.+++ •••••

~x~xxxxxx~ ++++++.+~+~++~+•• ++ •• ~~+~+~+~ •••~xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx~J ++++++++++.+++++++++.++~+••

+)X~XXX~XXX~xxxxxxx~xX, .+.+++.++++++~++~++~+~.

JX X X X X X ~ X X X X X X X X X X X X X ~ X X X X +++.++.+++++.++~+.+XXXXXX~XXXXXXXX~XXX~~XXXy~XXX +++++++++++~.+++

~XXXXX)XX)XXXXX~~XXXXXXXXXXX~~~XYX +~+~++~+++~+

+XX~XXX~XXXXXXXXXXXX~~~~XX~XX~xxxx~xx~ ++ •• ++++

IX XXXXX~XXXXXXXXX~~XXXXXXXX+ ++++&8Ef1€e6-Ae€€6e-:;e€~_ .., X X X xx ~)l X '( XX X X xx ~< '( X:< '( ,E6€-.g~€E~ee6R€~~e~~pee8Ee~ .. ~, ~ '< X X xX X v '( x.x)( X)t x X xx -e

+ee€e98eReeee6~-AF.qFAep~eA~E.c~~~ -'. ~ '.(XX~<XXX'<'l.XXXX

I

EEee.q·t{;~~eeeEeee-@,,-eea. t;Eeet;8. t::;~'?ec.~C...C .. 8/.' . ~. '( '(X ~<Y.' '(3.~.aaa· '_ ~J:.t;AP€~e~.p-eCQ~~+:~~~A~. xxx X

1I11.1I•••~••••• III •• III.Jt ~_ ~~EQE€~~eeeAP~QC:;.

+.~....I~~.W.~~~.~.~.~.'~R.~~~ _~~FF~PAE~€~~€€~J~

I-+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------~-

40 50 60 70 ao 90 100

SCREW ~PEE~

SY~8CL y

•••••• 344. 4135 ~67. 2702+ ..... +++ 367.2702 412.Q835

~""II""50~. ~lO) 32,7.2.61CJ

X)('(xxx 41~.qq~t') t\S 8.6969eER€~e 453.6q6<J 504.4103

Figure 23. The Effect of Temperature and Screw Speed onthe Die Pressure at a Constant Moisture Contentof 40 w/o.

Page 73: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

dqdt

410TEMPERATURE

Figure 24. DSC Endotherm for Indium

63

Page 74: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

dq - dt

34

0I

'-I

J3

60

38

0TE

MPE

RA

TUR

EC

eK)

40

0

Figu

re25

.T

ypic

alDS

CE

xoth

erm

ofT

extu

rize

dS

oypr

otei

nPr

oduc

t

(j"\ +=a

Page 75: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

65

CONTOUR rt CT flF "'E~l~CRJ\Tt'qE r c i v s , ~CREW Sr>EEr.> (RP~)C 0 ~ T oU f< S \ n '::: 1\8 ') C P n TIn N S (W / C )

160. a

1'37.5

155.0

T"-

M 152.5pfRA 150.0T

U~

E 141.5

14'5.0

142.5

140.0

,+X'(XX'C,o( <~,. +++++++++++++++ .. +++.f- •••••••••••••••••1 '<!:XX,(,(J!.~XX. "~+"+++++++++-"'+++++f- •••••••••••••

~< x ;< ;: :<:< :< '< x <:< X ;<. I ~ +- to + f- -+- +- + +- ~ .........+ 4- • • • • ••••t " <X'J( :\ .~ X )( ~< :< )( xxx x + + ++ +- -fa + ~ .. +.. -+ .... .. ... .. • • • • •+8F- ,;<~<xx:(XX'<xx'(:'L..'<x ++++++-++ ++++++ ... ++++ +++ ...., EF~.g . ':(~·'<".('(f(X)(:(y~x'<xx +.... +++++++++++ .. +++++++++.. •l pc~pc "XX;<XXXX;<X;<~<XXX>~. ....... +++++++-+++++++++++ .......1~AR-8g~~9 x xx x xz x« x xxx xxx~< + ... -+ ++ -+ +++ +- +++ ++-+++~ 8';; ~A=;";F~f=tF./X X:<;< x ~< '< )(x ~<:x x:<x X' + + + + ++ ... + + ++ + + ++ ++ +

Iq~ e.Gp ~ f=.F F F-p.,. " xy :< '< X '( X '< '< x;J(;< x:{ ;< + fa+ + + ..cQc~~a~F~~R~R YXYVXX~XYXXXXXXX ++++++++++++ •• ++++t~p~EPce8AERRqA xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;~++~+++.++++++++++, E-el::=G@~O-8p~q_ x y x x xxxxx xx X)I xxX. :I-++ + ++++ ++ ++ +++ +­,~ _C~A~CgRPRF~q8 XXXXXYXXXXXX~XXX ++++++++ ... ++++++J~~ .~G~ARq888gqgc~X~XXXXXXYXXXXXYX++++++++++++++I :1~ ~ ·F~F+=:f:8~~8~R~ X xXxxxx xxxxxX~;( x . + ... ++ + +... +++ +++-+- .".1Il ~PRC~QQAFQPF~F- -. xxxxxx x><xxxxxx xx +++++++++++++

~' ~~~_~ ':;flQaAPf=i.. ';,·M.:::~F .. ~<XXYXXXXX.~<XXXyyx +++++++++++++I~~~~ F~cRF~R~c~~~ XXXXXXXYXXXXXYXXX+++++++++++++~~ K~R. ':~c8Rr;Q8R'::~FtXX;<xxx x ~< x x x x:< x x X x " ++ ++ ... + + .. ++ ...

~ ~"~R~~, ':lpaAeq?A~~F '( ~'< x xxx xxx xxxxx ~x +++ + ++ ++ ... ++ +

(

' ~.,.~~~~. ~eE.€AE~8Fe.c.8X'<XXXXXXXXXX~<XXX, +++++j.++-+++++R8~R~~ ~eBeBe8RP xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx~ ++++++.+.~+++

1 ~~,,,,.~ +;&E~E.Q~.:ep_ 'C:X)(XXX':(XXXXXXXX ++++++++++t-+++t-I~.~"II p~s=eFI=PAFc.fl XXXXXXXXXXXXXYX ... +++++ ...+++ .. +++, ~ ~ ~ R ~ . ~e~AEg8A8~~ xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ++ .. ++++++++++++~_~~~~•._QAe~8.P8Q8.RR xxxxxxxxxxxxx++++.++++++++++++t3~~~~ RPP98P~~Qg8_xxxxxxxxxxxxx+ ++++++++++++-+++++-aJi ~~~ ~GFee~@F-F-&/ x '< x '(xxx x '( x x x,. +++ + ........... ++ ++ ...~

I

~~~~ ,Pi?.fl..;.;Ff3fle~= ~<'<~('(xxxxxxxx +-++++++++-++++ ...+ ••;1J1!I ..~ _&e8FF8BER~ ,.~ x x v. '( xxx x x x ~ + +++ f-+++ + + ••••~" ..AA-F::;8A~GePAR '·('.(X:{~<)(XXXXX .. +++ ++++++++ ••••••

+-1~ Ft=.A~Pf;pp.Qe..q ;(Xxxx'<~XXYX/ ++++++ ..++++++ .,;-+-------+-------+--------+-------+-------+-------+-40 SO 60 70 80 90 lOu

SCREW SPEED

......<''( .'< '< ~/ ;<~8~R8'1

25.(-t:B45L~7.:6l13

31.94649]{).13185

40.31721

y

27 • 7 () 1 t 33 1 .91.649

36. 1 :1 t 3540.31721

42.4-0988

Figure 26. The Effect of Temperature and Screw Speed on theProduct ~bsorption at a Constant Moisture Level of35 wlo

Page 76: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

66

CO~JT(JUR PLoT OF T!::-1!'s.:P/\Tt'ClE r c i V~. r~ntSTtJPF CCt-4TENT (W/O)C'lr"TGUP~ t\RC .\n~OPPTtONS (w/r-:)

[~C"~T(-:UP PL':T OF Xl*X3

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •:( X X v <X X t- .... ++ + ........... + ... +

q, XXX(XXX,++ ++++++++'. '( '~ X X '( X. ... + + +- ...+ ... + .......

ce- '<.~Xi<X~<X. ++++++++++++Q~e~~~~xxxx~ +++++++++++++ ••••••••••••••q.f:.~ '( .( XX XX ~~ X ...+ ........ +++ ... ++ + ........~~EA ~xxxxxxx ++++++++++++++~~8~~ XXXXXXXX ++++++++++++++~8AFP,_ '(xx:<v.X"<x ~+++++ +++++-+++ ....c.8cf?-~ xxxx:<xxx +++++ + ... ++++ +~

~SF 8 c; X X X "~ .( Z XX ...+ ... + + + + + .... + + + ... + •••••••~gF&F-l=+A .XX~<X·<X'(X +++++1-++"++++++++ ••••••

f;eRFA'1 X",XX'(;(XX ++++++++++++++++++ ••••f:pf=.,ge ''r(X'<'<XYXX ...+... ++ .. ++ ... ~++++++ ...++ ••8AAR88 XYXXXXXX +++++++++++++++++++++e~Q~88 ;<:<x'<xxxx .++ .......+++~ ........ +++++++++++

~ _&pc.3f=-e xxx:t.xxxx +++++++++-++++~++-++~+.. +~~ P~AP8F! xxx~xxxx +~+++.++~+++++++++++++

~x A:'-;~E6.g' '/"''.'lXXXX .. ++ .. +++++++++- .. ++++ ...... ++~~ FFcA6R yxyxx~xx'+.++++.+~+-++++++.... +.+++~'X AOR6eeQ XX:<XXY;<X ++ ....... f-++++++++ ....+++++X3 &~FoE=-Ec:;. .;<~I(~~X'<)(XX -1-++++ ...+++++++++++++ •~~~ ,APeE@9 xx"<XXXXy ++++++++~+++++++++ ••~~gII_FeaE~c xx:<x'(xxx +++++++++++++++++J~~ q~RFeA xxxxxxxx .+~++++.~+++++++

~~~ Qg888~ XXXXXXXX +.+++++++++++++~ •••••'~~~. ~@8~8R xx:{x:(XXX .. ++++++++ .. +++ ..+••••••~.~~ ~t:;e8A8 x~<;<x.:<xxx ++'++++++- .. +++++ ••••••JI~. A~~R.g . X~ X XXX XX ",,,,.f- ++++ ++ + ....f4~" AQ@Aeg .X'(:.()4'XXXX +++ ++++ +++~~~ 88Q&e~.Xxxxxxx +++++++++.+X ~ 3 ,98eR A. , X X ;<X X X X + .... + ++ ++ + ... •••••••••:4~ , Q~ 9_ X >< ~-( X X X X X + + + +.. + ...+

I---+-------+------+------+----- ..-----+--------

~o.o ?3.5 27.0 30.5 34.J 37.5

1 t4- 0 • o

I1 fj Q • 0 +

\f

151.5 ...

I155.0 +

.,. IE!'A 152.5 ...p

IER~ 150.0 ....T Il JRr> 1 /+ 7 • 5 +

t1

145.0 ...,

142.5 +-,I

'.40ISiURE

y

......t- .. ~ .. 4- to

'< XX '< ~~ ~~

EFA":'A8.......22.1273632.55552Al.4118350.2fS\.l13

59.12.444

32. 55552.\. 1 • .:. t 1 83

50. 1~681359.12444-03.55260

Figure 27 . The Effect of Temperature and Moisture on theProduct Absorption at a Constant Screw Speedof 70 RP~1

Page 77: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

67

CONTOUR PLOT OF SCPE~ S~EEDCONTOUR S ARE

(Pf"'~) v s , r~()I$:tJRE CO",JTE~~T

~BSOhPTrON~ (~/a)

('11/0 )

CONTOlJP nLor or X2*)(3

..........

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •................

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••••••••••••••••

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• ••••••••••••••••••••••••

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

••• +++~++++ •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.+ ++++++++++ + f- + + +

+ + + + + ........ +++++++++++

...... ++++ .... +++XX +++++++++~+.++

~xx ++++++++++++++~xxx +.++++ ...+++++++~,XXXX ++++++++++ .. ++++ •••••••••••••••••••~x~xx~ +~+~++++++.++++

~x~xxx~ +++++++++++++++)CX)("( )C)()()(. ++ ....... +........ + .... +........~XXX~)(XXX +.+++++++++++~+~ ••••••••••••••~~~~~xxxx ++++++ ••+++.+~.~ •••••••••••••xx~~~x~~ ... +++++~++++++++~ ••••••••••••

Q, xxxx~x~x +++~~~~++++++.+~

x~~~~x~xx +++++++ ... ++++++++eF8 )( )( x)( x)( '(xx. ... ++ ..... + ++ ...... + .. fa++ f­ReeS x~~xxx~xx .++~++++++++++.... + •••••••••FEPB X)(XXXXX:<X++ ....... ++++ .......f- .... ++++ ••••••••eeB6S- xxxxxxxx +++++++++ ...~++~++ •••••••~@eee ~xxxx~~xx ++++++~++++++++++ ••••••~~F9Ae8 XXXXXxxxx .~+++++++~+++++++ •••••

pease x~xxxxxxx, ~++++++++.++++++~ ••••F8SA8E xxxx~xxx ++++++.+++.+ ... +++ ••••eeepe8.XXX~XXXXX ++++++++++~++++++ •••

12 eEe~eee xx~xxxxxx,++++++++.+++++++~ •••• Ee~~ee_ xxxxxxxxx ++.+++++~++++~+++ •I~R eE@8EeR_XXXXX~xxxx +++++~.++++++++++

+ ~••~ eQS8BF9 ~xxxxxxxx. +++++++~+++~+++++f

----+------+-_._---+._-----+------+------+----------20.0 23.5 27.0 30.5 34.0 37.5

40

9J

50

70

....

I+

I+

I80 ....

I+

I+

I+

I

60

1 :) ')

110

c.

5CREw

MO T 5 TlJR E

SYMBOL y

••••••• ++ ++ +

'J( XXXXX€EA~F1~

2g.6358435. 9 7~23

48.6510061.3277£3

74.00456

35. 974234~3.6~tOO

61.327787~ .00456

aO.3~294

Figu re 2'8. The Effect of Screw Speed and Moisture on the ProductAbso~ption at a Constant Processing Temperature of150°C (zone II)

Page 78: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

68

expansion was caused by the sudden release from elevated

pressure at the die to atmospheric pressure and the flashing

of the water vapor. Figure 29 shows the effect of

temperature and the screw speed at a constant) initial

moisture content of 30 w/o. The result indicated an area

near a minimum; an increase in screw speed at low

temperature produced a high and low bulk density.

The relation of temperature and moisture on the bulk

density is illustrated in figure 30. Increased temperature

and moisture content increased the bulk density, because

high temperature produced the flashing of water vapor, which

increased the expansion.

As previously mentioned, it was desirable to maintain a

low enough temperature at the die to prevent the product

from overheating, yet high enough to enable sufficient heat

to be added to cause proper fiber formation. The die

temperature was set at SOoC. The actual temperature was

greater; the dies used were not equipped with a cooling

system allowing an increase in temperature due to mechanical

friction and chemical reaction. The actual temperature of

the die was taken as a dependent variable of the product

temperature. Response surface analysis plots are shown in

figures 31-33.

Page 79: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

69

Cn~JTCUP PLCT CF -r:~~PER,\Tt'RE r c i VS. SCRr=\-j 3rr::::: f) (CP~)

CC~~rOUf'S \PE 13ULK OE";S1TiES r5/C()

160.0

157.5

155.0

T~

M 152.5pEpA 150 • .JTuPE 147.5

145.0

142.5

140.0

I+W3 .~~e xxxxxx ~~++++~~~+++~+•••••• ~++~+~+~~~+++~

I~ ~ ~ _ R ~F~. ~ X. XXXXX ++++++++++++.~+~~+++~+++~~~~.++4~~~~ &8P~ ~xxxxx ++++++++~+++++++++++~++++++~++~+ ·~~~.eeFg ~xxxxx, ++++++++++++++++++++~++++~+++~' y

+ •••.pcEAe XXXXXX ++ ..+++++++++ .....+~ ...... ++++++++++++ .~y

I~'-II .F9S8Q XXXXXX ++++-++++++++-+-+++++++ ...+++~+ .. ~+ xx.~. f;f=oEF8 XX XX X X ...++ ..... + +++ ++++'-++ +- + ++ +++++ + + ~.... x;·- x.~~ A@eeR XXXXXX ++++++++++++++.+++++++++++++ ,xxx

...... q9f;~. XXXXXXI +++++++++++++++ ... ++++++++++ xx).~x

f11K ~F-_.e-A. iO(XXXXX' + ... +++ ............... + ........... ++ .............. + ... + )·XY;<.~~ PBeF xxxxxxx +++++++++++++++~+++~++~+++xXXyv,,~ Ee~ep x xx xx x x: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ~XYY~';··

+~~ FEq~_ XXXXXXXX ++++++++++++++~~+++++++++ YVYXYX

I.~ .. e~p_.. ~ XXXXXXXX +++++++++++++++++++++++++ VYYXXX• fTFU?& XXXXXXXX ++f-+ +++++++.+++ ... --4-+++++ ....+++ :<Xy>:~/}:

~ e6pq~ ~~xxxxx ++++++++++~++++~++++++++++

+, SAgeS X)()tyXXX ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ~X)(>~vYX

I8E~~E8 XXXXXX ++++++++++~+.+++~++++++++++XYYYXXv

._866fi8 :<'<XXXXX +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ XYX.XXXeA88A8 XXXXXX ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ XYXXXX

+sese8 .xxxxxx +++++++++.~+++++++~++++.++++ xxx~xx

Isese . "'X)t:'()t)( ++++++++++++++ .... ++++.++++++++++ XYXYXX.eeee x~xxxx ++++++.+~.++.+++++++++++++++++XXXyyy-se ~ xx )C)()(~ +++++++++.+++++++++++++++++++++ XYXXXX

+eeB xxxxxx ~+++++++++++++~+++++~+++++.++++ xxxxxx, ee X)(")XX x.++.... +-++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++ rxxxx x

8A XXXXX +++++~++++++ •••••• ++~++++++++++ XYXXY~xxxx +++++++++++ •••••••••• +++++++++++ xx~xx

+ ~xxxx ++++++++++ ••••••••••••• +++++++++++ xxxx

I x~xxx +++++++++ •••••••••••••••• +++++++++ XXXX)XXXX +++++++++ +++++++ xxxXXXX ++-++++++ ••••••••••••••••••••• +++++++ .. )tXX

+xxxx ++++++++ ••••••••••••••••••••••• ++++++++ xxI-+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-4~ 50 60 70 80 90 100

SCPEW SPEED

SYMBOL

••••••.+++++XX)txxxe~B-"..,."

1.548828I.S75964

1.6302371.684-510

1.738783

y

1.5759641.630237

1.6A45l01 .738783

1.765919

Fi gure 29. The Effect of Temperature and Screw Speed onthe Broduct Bulk Density at a Constant MoistureContent of 35 wlo

Page 80: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

mn

C·..

.,.:nm1)~m-t

......

........

....~

......

....l:-

.f>~

~lit

c.nU1

U10\

0N

U1'"

0N

Ul

"""0

••

••

••

••

•0

Ul

0tn

0111

(;,J

U10

n 0 Z -f 0 C ;0 "r Q ....~o

0"

Z ....-

4am C~

~;.

01

)0

L1;T

1Z

1)

-4J>

J-C

)~

...C

",C

.",t

)

]1

.'-0

CI

r......

.o

~n

-4~J

0f'1

..."z<

:.J)

V)

X....

........

-i'*

-~'~

xt'l

f'J;.j

.J1,;

1!""

"'4

~)

.....-.

.:l:

,-n

)',:

1~~ ...".

.., ~ .?.

---i ".l'.. ·4 ..... ~ "

'-J

(J0

++

++

++

++

++

++

++

++

++

++

++

++

++++++++++++++~+~+U~~~~~~~

~++++++++++++++

~~~~~~~XXX~

+.+

++

++

++

++

+XXX~XXxxX~XXX~XX

++

++

++

++

++

KXXXX~~XX~XXXXXXXXX~

~++++++

x~XXXXXXXXX~XXXxXXX~XXX

++

++

XXXX~XXXXXXXXXXXXXX~XX~XXX

+,~X><X><XXX)(X><XXX)(X)(XXXX

XXXX~XXXXXXXXXXXX

.m

mm

nmm

mx

x)(

x)(

xx

xx

xx

)()(X~J)

JJn

,n.n

:b:'n

n1

)'D

nen

m~x~~~xxxxx

~~~~

nVD~~mm~n~,o~m~

)(x

xX

X)(

xJJ

:.DrtJ

J)(J

)-n

.n-11

:0J)

'n~

111\

ttl1

).J

)rn

en:n

.flm

~)(

xX

X--

'on

11:tJ

J)"V

~uIV

Du

ell'D

J)11

1)11

(n·o

nrn

Itl

1)D

;lJ-n

><X

,1

)m

rnCD

rn1)

.n11

-n1)

'b1)

Tlm

11rt

l-n11

1len

1lttl

m1'J

1111

:1),n

1l'D

'1l3

JItl

m'n

(D1)

1l'1

)enen

11

1)

1111

m.n

'1lrn

'Drn

rom

dl1'

1J(f

)n

11.n

111

)n.

nm

n.n

n(1

)'1)

J)\.1)

IIIn

.1)'n

mn

·nII

.nr1

ln

nen

~1l

:nj)

11D

Inni

l11

D,.,

n,1)

'DiJ

)rn

11:tJ

'll1

Jn11

'~b

'n,t

1)0

-n1)

'Dn

1).

'"D

'nn~n~~nm~~m~~~~~~nn

••••

n~~~m~~~~~m~~~'

••~.~••••~.w••

1)11

l':t)

11n

11'f

);0

'n!'b

•,.

JI•

51"

""

J!II

I"

JII•

II•

,.,.

:IInn~~~DD~n

.~••••••••_~~••~•••~.

11h

10J)

'0m

rn.

•,.••

:.••

"••

"•

:.•

,.•

,.•

""•••

,.n

0'D

'J)

n"

•:J

I•:.

211•

11JI••

JI]I

JI11

JI•••

JII,

."

,.JI

""

mn

n.

tila

:I'•

•"

•,.

""

•"

•,.

"•

""

III•

""

,.JI

•]I

",n

0••

JI

JIllJ

III

":I

I•311

11••

JI"

,.)t

)1"

JI

JII)

ItJI

11•

,.•

,."

••~••~••~••

w••••a.»

».a

•••••

R•••

~~~.R••~••

W•••••••••~•••••••

_•••

­w••~~_~.~••••~~.~.~~••~.R~~~~~M~~

~.~~3~~~••••

_.M~..

~~.~.~

••~•••••••

M••••••••••••••••••••••

••~~~•••••~•••

w•••

_•••••~•••~•••~

~.~~••~•••~••

»••••••

a••~~••••••

a•

.~~...

.w~.~...

•....•

...a•••~.~•••

~..~

w.~

~..~

~"

~_..

~

.~~~

•••••R~~.»W••••••••

W••••••••~

.~~~~~~~...

~.~....

~..~.

...~~-~~~~

••~.~aa.~••••~~•••~•••••~••••~~••

•••••••••••~ww~•••••••••••••••••

)It

•"

"~

""

"...

""

•]1

11

,.

•"

"JI••

]II,.

",.

•JI

"JII

J)"

)it

]II

JI)I,.

""

.M)4

""

JI"

,.,>

e_

JIJI

,."

,.)I

I"

""

JI)I

I.

nn

.11,.".

:JlIJ

"..

II)I

I"

",.

•JI

•)I.....

,.

JII:

II:JI

ll.J

I~

"n

1111

nn

I-+

......

....-

....+

........

....--+-----+---+~+.............-+............-

+--

----

+--

--I

~t

•+

01 I t

!\)I

Wi

•1­

U1

I I I t;\

lI

~I

•+

ot I I t

'JJ

I0

1

•+

011 I I I

UJ

,

~t

•+-

L)

I I I IU

JI~I

•+

VlI I I I I I t I I I

"--I.

1C C -S ro W .0

(j')

ri"

--I

•11

)(+

.(J

)

'"0

::J:

:rII

rnX.'

-<ro

mm

•:ll

)(+

.~

m•

mx

+.

CDC

L-0

rn""

"S-t)

:Mll

X+

.0

OO

-t)

;II

C1'lX

••I

-t)o

..m

c()

"-J

()

rt

O"'a

rt

-0

.......

...~;0

CO

--t)

••

••

•-0

C(J

lL

Jf.

)...

03

:--

-'--

I!'J

\:)U

l...~

:tA

m 3\J

r'J~

"-J3

)::J

0'"

0V1

uU

'lo

f\)

.'1

rom

...").W

;u~,n

Ul

~")

.......

r'Jfj

WG

)....

Ul

OJ

--I.

rt

CrtC

I, I

I,

.:u<-<

")rn

roO

J-

.........

.~

.....rtO

J ~.

••

••

OJ

0-

','On

U1

WtJ

...

\JIIJ

\.JU

'...

n3

:J)

\1)

;VJ)t~

o0

~--I.

r.>.J

lc)

tJ1

0U

lU

l.')

~jJ

N...

.rt

rt

rJ1.-

;'JN

:..J

~O

Jc:

~")

rtro

(,/)0

n::s

") ro :£

Page 81: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

71

CO~jTCUR r-i.nr GF TEMryEPI\T'JRE (C) 'Is. ·SCREW SPEED (RPM)CONTOURS ~Rc ppa~UCT TEMPEP\TU~cS (e)

CONTCUR ~LOT OF Xl*X2

160.0

15?5

155.J

TEM 152.5p

Eq,A 150.0,\JRE 147.5

145.0

142.5

140.0

I++++++ XXXXXXXXXXX/~qp~~A~~cpopqc~e~ ~.~~.~~._w.. ~

1++ ++ + )(X)t':(X. X;(XXX'(X 4?~~.... A+=1~Q~c.~q~,=-=~c... ~••«.IIII.JII • .II1.+++++ xxxxxxxxxxxx BB€AR€~~BA~8~E~~~ ~~.~~~~R~_

++.+++ ~xxxxxx~~xxx FC8~RQ68CAQq~Q~AC ~1.~~R•••++++++++ xxxxxxxxxxxxx 88e~~~8c~Qa~c~~F~Q I~ ••• ~I

1+++ xxxxxx.x:<:<xxY;< ..eG.. ~.IQ..f;Q.Qe~. fl~...R~~~. ~.,.qQ. . .. . . ~.JI.

..... + + xxx xxx xxxxxxxx -AP.~A~~l:;.pQ4;q::lC~~t=.~A .a.~ •

..+ ++ + .. + ... + x x x xx XX X)( 'J( '()( Y'. ~'3~"3eC;€C;'?At::~qR.o~C I~ II+++++~.+++ xyxxxxxxxxxxx BEe8€~~CEC~~~QE8QCAC .~

1. + + + + + ++ + + xxxxx~xxxxxxxx BP.Q._@€.EQ~..~~A~FRe~~~EQF.~ •••••+t+++++ XXXXXXXXXXXXXX qgc~~c~~q8~CCFC~8~~=

+.++++t++++ XXXXXXXXXXXXX ~~C~~~~CQ=~c~~QCC~C~~

+ + ++ + + + + ++. +,. xxx'(X:<;( X)( xxx x ';( 9qt=lA~P~FQ'::~Q4=-QA~C4=~~Q

1. + +++ ••• ++++ 'XXXXXXXXXXXXXX cc~p~.Rgg~.. q~pgo~c~RC.C• ++ ........ ++++++ XXXXXXX)()(XXXX;<. QCAE~Qt:?f:~gc.e"::QQC~;)':;

t •• ++++++++++.+ XXXXX'(XXXXXXXX ....e~~E~A8~EQ.-E-~pccc~8+ •• ... .......... ++ ...... + xXXX ;.<:()()( X)t x~ xx X gC8c~t;C;Q..AEc9c;.;:.~~g ~

f

.. ++.++++++++ xxxxXXXXXXyxxYx'p~EP~CQCPQ~~Q~~~QF

••• +++ .....+++++++ xxxx~xxx.. xxxxxxx_~~p~c .. ~q~~.. c~cc~.·cc=••• +++.+++++++ XXXXXXXXXXXXXYX ~~P~~PBp~~~c~~~e

+ •••. +....... ++++..... XX;(~(~XXXXXX)(X;<x g,?gQ~.g8~CQQQC.t=;F'?

I....• ".+++++++++,XX.)(X"(XXXXX.'Y,<X. ~v.. ~€p...,.c.. a'.'AQ.e.•. gc.. pq+;~Qc;•••• +~+++++++++ xxxx~xxxxxxvxxv _~~c8~g~CQ~CC~~C

•••• +++++++++++ XXXX~YXXXXXXXY~~ ~~88PRRF~F8~~~Q

+ •••• ++ ••• ++++.++ xxxxxxxx~xxxxxx ~~~C~~FCC~~CCCQ

I

..... +++ •••++++++ x'(xxxxxx:<xxxxxxx g~~88~~=;~P~~FF

•••••• f~++ .. +++++~ xxxxxxxx~xxx.xxxx 8~.CqQ.QqgC=CQC.~..••••• +++++++++++ XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, c~qp~8~~F~~~q~

.........+ ......... ++ ..+ ... ++ xxxxxxxxxxxX~Y:X. ,C;C.A~QCPFR~~C~

,•••••• ++++++.+++++ x~xxx.xxx~XV~~XXy ~epcc=c~.~F~A8•••••••••• +.++++++ XXXXXXXXXXXXXYXX. ~A~8~Q888CCCQ•••••• ++++++++++++)(;('(XXXXYXXX'lXX)lY QPP~~C~C=~~~~

+ •••••• +++++++~++++ XXYXXXXXXYXXXYX CC~~~Q~~~~C:

I-.-------+-------+-------+-------.-------+-------~-4J 50 60 70 80 90 100

scpr-:'fi SO"=:~!')

SYMBOL y

•••••• 66.91517 71.02899.+++++ 71.02819 7?25662xx xxxx 79.25662 87.481\25c;eq~AA 87.4q425 95.71188

~~~~~. 95.71183 - 99.62570

Figure 31. The Effect of Temperature and Screw Speed onProduct Temperature at a Constant Moisture Contentof 27 wlo

Page 82: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

72

CONTOlJR PLOT OF TEMPt:R~TlJPr: r c i 'IS. 1~(1t:STURE c ourer-r (\I/O)CONTOURS ~PE PRGDlJCT "'F~~nEP~iUPES r c i

CCf'4TfltJP f'LCT SF XlftX3,160.v +

t157.5 ....

I155.0 +

T ,EM 152.5 +p IEqA 150.0 +T Iu~

F: 147.'5 +

I145.0 +

I142.5 +

J14-0.0

..qeee 1.lmlll.... I".I.IIIII""'11.~ .€~8.c;~t:; YVYYXA€EPE .•R.~R~••I.I~R~R.~.~ PFQcc~q .~yvXX

qeeqae ••••••••••I.W.~~. q~Q~~G~~ xxxxxfQE6e~Ee ~ R~•••••• I.R~••R CCCP~~Q~~ Xyxxx+gaeSARgRR ••~•• ~ ••a •• _eR~QQBQQg'XXxxx~.8AESA8E9S9 ~••~IWW ~e~g~~q~9~ XXYXy~+

geee~Eeef1~e . ~GQ';~QBA~~;:;g ~xxx)('+1++ee"~8E-6.c;8Be-eBt:1E~A€~€-Ac;~~~-E.c:; XXYXX:l.f++

, E.g~A.g~cA~et;e.pe~PFt?RF ~~€;gQ~QR e~ ;< ''.X Y)f :(i+'"+X eAP8€qQAqFFR6AR~~e~g=c~~~=c~ .xxyxxx/++~X :Eee{;€.13f;-E1=16~8-&EBE,,=€r;€~·~Ee-Et:; ~ X:< if XX X/+" + +XX qpeeeESpe8PG8~e~F4q~ggqq~~ xxxxxx~~+++

XX e€€€e&e~e~8€A~eAE~€~· ;(XYXXXx,t.++++XXX G68e'3e;::"'~PR~Q86RASqC;84?':; .xxxx'(xxj.............~~x ee€~€eBeeeBg~€e~pe~B~~E ~xxxx~~++~++

xxxx Aeq8~89pPA8~AF8~9Qq~f= .t·(XXX~('1'.( ++-+++)( X X X e6-e.;;.geEAA8~~-E€eR.g+::B~-A ... :" X X :< X X X ',+",,,"''' ..xxxxx ~~~g~e~R6Rq~~F88~8q X~XXXXXXt+++++.

X)()(XX €e9B~.e8€e€QE€A-Ae:;;~~ X~'(XXXY'('/"'++~+-+-.

X)()()( X X Re~9E8~6eReFg~ ,,-=log X X <'t X v y X y' ~+- of- +- .. + •'( '()(~)()( 8RBA..g+:;ee€..g~A-e~ X X X:'( )( X '( X: ++ + + +- ....XX))(XX Fe88ggAe~EEq~8~ xxxxxxxxx ..++~+ ••)()( )C ~ '( X X €-EAePE6€fl~€f=tFA'; .:< X X;.< X )( X X y • ++ .. +- .....)()()C:x)( XX 8FRfH3A88pe~~s~.X X X X X .'< X X X ~ + ++ + ++ ••X)r"}('fX)(X .E-A~eaE~6f;Ae~ .)(XX'<XXXXX .++++++ ••X)()C)C)()(XX 86eE-lee~~C;:;~8~._. XXXX)(XXXX +++++-+ ••)()( )C X )I X)( X e8~SBe-F-E€~.:< X X X ';l X X X X X It- .... + ........XX)(X,.:xxxx ,AeegeEA~8 XXXXYXXXXX~++++f-•••xx~~~~xxx AE€Seee€ee xxxxx~~~xx~~+++++~•••X~)()(XXXXX P98f;f;f;6$:f?8. X;lXXX.(:~XXXX++++f-"•••'(X)()()(~XXXX f;t?8eee~ec;; .X'lXX'/)(:~)(XX)( ++++~ •••)()( )( :< X X X X X X 68eeEe.e~~ X" X X:~ X X)( X X X + + .

.. X)()(XXXXXXX ee9888eee .xxXX~<':<'<;'<X~X +++++ •••,---- +----- ...----- ... ------ +------ + - --_.- -+ _.- - - - -----

20.J 2~.5 2 7 . 0 3J.5 34.0 3 7 . 5

MOISTU~E

SYMBOL y

•••••• 82.€Sq87 - ~'5.1q520

++++++ a5.19~20 90.26586

X:< xX)(X 9.).~65AF) - 95.3365~

g-Ase€e ~S.J~652 - 1 0 .) • 40"" 1 q

~".1"~. 100.~~07t8 - 1 ('2.9425 1

Figure 32. The Effect of Temperature and Moisture on theProduct Temperature at a Constant Screw Speed of135 RPM

Page 83: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

73

CONTOUP PLOT OF SCPEW SP~~D (PP") "J. MnT5T'JRE COf'~TENT CW/O)C~tITntJP<; ~PC: DP~DUCT rE~~flER\T'.JPES (e)

ABAAS Ra ••••R.R~~~~~~~~.~~I~~~R. -c~~q~~~~ge68 .WWR~~~~••~.~~.~RI~~RI8.R ~~~c~Ba~EeaE€e~ 1•••• I ••III~I~~I~R~I~8~1 ~~~~P86a.c;+:; 43 e€ ~ ;;_ .. a .. JII. II • I • III II JI" ... JlIIIII,. ~ Jt Q C C OR £; t?,Cf8~@REe88 .~•• ~•••~al~~3~~~~I~ ~G~9~~~8Q

ReFee~~~F ~~.R~.W~.I~~~~.~~~ ~~AA=~8~~~

PB·~Be~~RRI=;~ •••a~ .. 311~~ ~~ ~ _J11 ~ _J~~t.:.c;~~-C.G+=.c~

~6AeBBeeeEee 1.11~IR.I. ~~cEFA~~&8~pg

. eee€t3AeeaE6et;p...:; ... ,.. ~gc=;~ a€~E€~6RA~Q

x ~~€~~~e~~@~~~e8GQE~AAeg~FP~cc~~~FCC~Q~q

x EAPReeAgqqAe~~BeeA~QC~~AqQ~~~~~~RP

XX' Ee@€€Be8AAB6~8B~€e~E~~~Bp~~~~c~SP8CA

xxxx ~~~e8EA~&8eReq~~qe~qqqF8~~S~qc~~QQx.~ xxx X €€E43-E€-':-F6-8€~~8€qeA~-E~.c;~+=.c4::EC~::;8. x 'I..X XX X X X .c:8~ep:::;C,PA.Q~l;FcP6=1qQQ~O~oS =:~.q 8::J X v:~

xx x ~ X)( '( .g~6-e~-e6.e~~f=Al?.c;R~~.cCCO€~~C~, X y ~" ,">c:<xxxx'Xxx ,,oP9=1Q6Q~C;PP8-c,gqG=9pQEt;.gc" "'(xx/~<

'j. X X)( )C )( ~ )( xx ,~e8€€qq€-F~R-Eq~~Q~~f;~~'::: \ x '~)! Y" '(.. xxxxxxxxx'(x, ,Fe.gqEEge88~~Q8~R~ .;'XXX'('I.'<+ XX)tX)C)()(XX'i.YX'( . B8EB8EeAe-e~ )(~XXX'<~<~~x

++ X)( x':( xxxxx;< xxxxx '< , ,~< x '( )( ~< ,'.I '< '( )( xx ;-< x.+. XX(XXXXXxxxxx~xYXXxxxxxx~~~~XXvxxxxx

++ + ...~ ~ )(.( ';( x xxx )( x)( X :< :( )( )t' x'( X "Jf X X)( '< "~'~ X y. "( ".I.. X '~ X X x X.... + ++ + xxx )( x x x x xx )( x )( )C x:< x )( x x x x '( X )( )( x ;( x x '< x ;.'+... + .. .. .. x x;< x "! X X X X '~ )( x xx xx x xx x:< x )( x x x x ,'.( x x ' ....... + ++ ++ + )( x xx J( )( '.( x yx x x x x x x x xx )( x ;~ X 'I ~( ..<x+-..-

+ + + ... ~ xxx)( x x )( xxx )( x xxxx ',( '( )( x X ~i. :< . .. ... ..-• • .. +.. + +....... xY'< xxxx xx ~< xx X '(X X X X ...... ~ +••• +++++++.+++++ ~XXYXXYXYXX~ .++++++•••• +.++++++.+++++++ ~.++~~+++++

+ ••••••• +++.+++++.++.++~.+.+~~~+~.~+..... ++-----.------+------.------+------+------+----------

20.0 23.5 27.) 30.5 34.0 37.5

50

8J

70

60

90

11 0 +

I..I+

I+

I+

I+

I+

I

1 u,J

w

sCR

sPEED

SYM80L v

••••••.... +++

)(XXXXXEEqFee"",~ ... 11I ..

S6.26426 ­cu.76u41 -

f,q.75':'-70 -7'3.74499 -

87.73728 -

60. 76·)4.169.75270

73.7·":~99

87.73728

92.23342

Figure 33. The Effect of Screw Speed and Moisture on the ProductTemperature at a Constant Processing Temperature of1400 C (Zone I I )

Page 84: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Chapter 7

DISCUSSION

The results of SEM and the analysis of variance prove

that it was possible to produce different product

characteristics. Texture, which is a product of va r t ab l e s '

interaction, can be manipulated by controlling the process

variables.

As expected, extrusion rate was primarily a function of

screw speed. Increased screw speed increased the quantity of

material passing through the die. Analysis of variance shows

that moisture and temperature also had a very significant

effect (P~O.Ol-table 6). This trend was probably related to

flow characteristics of the feed material. Increased dough

moisture resulted in lower bulk density and greater

percentage water absorption. Increased moisture content

produced a certain degree of swelling (caking) of protein

molecules, which caused the decrease in flow rate. An

increased temperature enhanced the swelling effect. It was

not known to what extent water absorption could be taken as

a measure of the degree of swelling of protein molecules

[65,66J.

Extrusion -rate at high screw speed was also a result of

pressure gradient. The pressure profile indicated the

location of maximum pressure, which was greatly dependent on

Page 85: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Tab

le6

Eff

ects

of

Var

iab

les

onE

xtr

ud

ate

Ch

ara

cte

rist

ics

LEV

ELS

OFSI

GN

IFIC

AN

CE

VA

RIA

BLE

SE

xtr

usi

on

Die

Bul

kA

bso

rp-

Pro

du

ctRa

teP

ress

ure

Den

sity

tio

nT

emp

erat

ure

Tem

per

atu

re~

0.0

1~

0.0

1NS

NS~

0.0

5

Scr

ewsp

eed

~0

.01

~0

.05

NS~

0.0

1~

0.0

1

Mo

istu

re~

0.0

1~

0.0

1NS

~0

.05

NS

Reg

ress

ion

88

.3%

89

.8%

14

.0%

53

.89

%74

.26%

(P~O.Ol)

(P~O.Ol)

(NS

)(P

-,O

.Ol)

(P~O.Ol)

.........

(Jl

Page 86: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

76

operating conditions, such as barrel temperature. flow rate,

frequency of screw rotation, screw geometry, and moisture

level [71J. In general, minimum pressure drop across the

ribbon die orifice ranged from 300 to 500 psi, which was

almost twice as much as the conventional method. The

pressure trend was difficult to establish. Increased screw

speed did not always increase pressure. This variable was

related to the viscocity of the molten material in the die

zone. As temperature and moisture increased, the viscocity

decreased. and the less viscous material flowed out faster,

so that pressure decreased.

The fiber die runs had a small die orifice (0.020 11) and

generated a higher pressure range (1000-1600 psi). This

indicated a higher friction in the land of the die. Too high

a die pressure was very significant for fiber formation. An

optical micrograph of the extrudate at too high a pressure

showed no fiber formation; the product was tightly

compacted, very dense and had very little rehydration value

(figure 34). After the die was disassembled, fibrous

structures were found in the reservoir section. It was

apparent that the high pressure, which produced high shear

strain and back flow, disrupted the fibers.

Fiber formation began in the screw channel. The shear

strain in the screw provided a good environment to align the

protein molecules during their flow. Therefore, increased

shear rate increased the possibility for chemical reaction

Page 87: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Figure 34. Optical Micrograph of Fiber Die Runs, 12X

77

Figure 35. Scanning Electron Micrograph of Run.F4 shows

Porous Structure, 700X

Page 88: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

78

and produced texturization. Fibers were further formed and

aligned in each consecutive heating section. The final

texture of the extrudate was a result of all these

reactions. The final extrudate seemed to remember the

formation in the screw section by showing interlaced fibers.

Analysis of variance gave an indication that all

process variables, temperature, screw speed and moisture had

a very significant effect on the die pressure (table 6).

The result of Differential Scanning Calorimetry showed

an e ndo t her a i c curve without a peak. This was expected

because soy protein undergoes an irreversible reaction and

behaved more like a dough. DSC analysis might not be an

appropriate method for characterizing soy protein

texturization. Furthermore, layers of the fibers were easily

separated along the direction of orientation. High

temperature produced a lateral fissuring to such an extent

tha t they had a weak 1i nk , Probabl s , the soy protei n wa s

only a semicrystalline or amorphous polymer.

Product absorption showed a decrease with higher feed

moisture, and an increase with higher process temperature

(figure 27). At lower temperature the product was uncooked,

tightly compacted, and very dense. There was very little

penetration of water during rehydration. As the product

temperature increased, the product was more structured

(fibrous), cooked and spongy, because upon exiting from the

die, the product expanded, becoming more porous and less

Page 89: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

79

dense. Figure 35 reflects the microstructure which shows

larger cavities and smaller filaments. The microstructure

illustrates that some of the tight fibrillar arrangement

observed at the die were lost due to sudden expansion. The

more spongelike the structure the more water will be imbibed

in the product.

~igh screw speed not only reduced the heat exposure the

protein received but also produced interlaced fibers. This

structure tended to trap the expanding steam within the

product when it left the die. This also elevated the

v;scocity of the dough, and reduced product expansion as it

left the extruder. Thus, it was less porous.

Table 6 shows that the absorption value was mostly

governed by screw speed and moisture content.

During the rehydration period, the protein did not

disintegrate or lose its structure and shape. This proved

that the protein denatured or changed its physical-chemical

and functional properties due to heat processing. The

extrusion process caused most of the water soluble soybean

protein to break into subunits and/or become insoluble.

Thus, heat and moisture caused progressive insolubility of

the protein in soybean meal [34,72]. A high pressure gave

higher extrusion rates and, in effect, increased the rate of

shear, which resulted in better cohesion and better

retention of structure on rehydration. Work done by Taranto

et ale showed that fibers formed at higher screw speed

Page 90: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

80

extrusion are stronger [5].

Theoretically, the passage from die to atmospheric

pressure is characterized by "puffing", which controls the

product bulk density. This is mainly due to flashing-off

superheated vapor and to the release of normal stresses. As

the material cools, it sets into a definite porous structure

with a slight size reduction.

There is no significant correlation between the

variables on the bulk density. Perhaps, it is related more

to the die temperature. Even though density changed quite

markedly over the range of temperature, width and thickness

remained constant (average degree of puffing was 40%). This

suggests that all physical changes occured prior to final

extrusion.

Temperature increases were not only found in die

temperature but also in the heating zones (figure 36). It

appeared that there were substantial heat sources other than

the heating element. The increased temperature came from the

mechanical work and frictional heat in the screw section and

in the die section, where the shearing action existed; the

dough temperature might be even higher than the desired

temperature.

Exceeding a floor temperature was necessary to provide

sufficient energy for denaturation. The thermal denaturation

of aligned protein molecules to form cross-link layers is an

irreversible endothermic chemical reaction in the extruder

Page 91: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

81

>!J L&.I

/1 z0

: I N

: /I

I >II

LIJ

Iz0

Vl

:QJ

/ N c:0

/N. rn

Ic:, -r-.

: I+Jct1:', QJ- :r:-

I - +oJc:QJ

LIJ S-

Z QJ

...: /4-

0 C+-

N .r-

/ -0

:

/.....,

.. ~

/ cu

•r--

-~,.

/'r-

e: 4-0

"- 0-.- I S-...- , 0-

"C " &1.1 QJ

0 S-

U • Z :::3

0 0+oJ., . ct1

65.

N S-

CI c: '\"OJ

c 0C-

;: .a ... E

• y-. Q).. ~ ..D ~.,ii Ii:en C'l

\c:

IVlVl

\QJU

I I&J 0S-

I \z CL.

0N

\(.,0(V').QJS-:::3en

.r-

0 0 0U-

ti)~ 4D

J o aJnl~Jadwal

Page 92: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

82

behaving as a reactor. Figure 37 shows the dependency of

residence time versus screw speed. Increasing residence time

would provide an environment giving a greater degree of

thermal denaturation. Zuilichem noted that residence time

distribution controlled the degree of mixing and the degree

of uniformity of the strain exerted on the dough [63]. In

the MTE system, residence time was increased by the addition

of the conditioner zone, this was about 5-10 minutes longer

than the conventional extrusion.

Extrudates obtained at lower than 40 RPM and higher

than 100 RPM demonstrated the erratic behavior of the

extruder. This study indicated that shear values decreased

as the initial moisture content increased, but above 40%

there was virtually no influence of moisture on texture.

Also, at lower moisture content (less than 20%), no

interaction was observed between shear value and process

temperature.

Observation of the physical appearance of the products

indicated that as temperature increased, orientation and

fiberization increased. The scanning electron micrographs

revealed alterations in physical structure during

processing. Figure 38 shows the appearance of fibers among

unstructured globular protein of run Gl (zone II-160°C, 30%

moisture, 40 RPM) at lOOOx magnification. Figure 39 shows

the exellent fibrous structure of run F3 (zone II-150°, 40%

moisture, 80 RPM) at 150x magnification. An isolated fiber

Page 93: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

16 83

8

..l.

99...

•.•...•.....•.•.,

•••••~.•.o .•..•.-­ •-.••

~t

-·-...0~......

••• •.... .....~ .

\

o•,,.,,.,,•,•...

40

6

RUN$ ZONEII

EJ C 140·C

14 & F I~OoC----0 160·C._....-..

12

LtJ2-I-

10

I.IJ(.)

ZlIJQ-enLtJ~

8

,..c-:2

SCREW SPEED (Rpm)Fi gure 37. Res i dence Time versus Screw Speed

Page 94: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Figure 38 Scanning Electron Micrograph of UntexturizedSoy Protein with Strands of Fibers, lOOOX

Figure 39. Optical Microscope of Fibrous Structure of Run F3,150X

84

Page 95: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

from figure 39 was

figure 41 shows the

moisture, 80 RPM).

85

shown in figure 40 (4000x). Finally,

fibers of run 13 {zone II-160°C, 35%

The limitation of this observation was the

unavailability of mechanical apparatus to measure the

quality of fibers on breaking strength, shear» or "c he w",

Also, the results were equipment specific. Larger scale

experiments should have an increase effect of temperature

and more complex non-Newtonian flow behavior [73].

Page 96: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Figure 40. Scanning Electron Micrograph of an Isolated Fiberof Run F3, 4000X

Figure 41. Scanning Electron Micrograph of Run 13, 1000X

86

Page 97: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Chapter 8

CONCLUSIONS

This study described the importance of controlling the

shear environment in the screw and die, the dough

temperature, and the residence time to produce varying

texturized extruded products of soy protein. The results

indicate the formation of fibrous layers. A summary of the

study follows:

1. Soy protein was continuously extruded by the MTE

process.

2. Controlling the shear rate and the flow rate through

the screw and the die was important in cantrall ing

fiber formation. Too high a shear rate at the die wall

disrupted the fibers.

3. Increasing the shear rate and the residence time (5-10

minutes) tended to enhance cross-linking between

protein.

4. The extrudate characteristics were highly dependent on

screw speed and temperature.

5. The operating pressure and extrusion rate were

dependent on the temperature, moisture, and screw

speed.

6. Process conditions were altered as a result of a longer

assembly line than in normal extrusion; pressure drop

Page 98: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

88

was increased from 300 to 1500 psi and residence time

from 5 to 15 minutes.

7. The product absorption was dependent on screw speed and

initial moisture content.

8. Product temperature was found to be a function of the

zone set temperatures and screw speed.

9. Dough temperature. was higher than the process

temperature due to the lack of a cooling system and

heat generation.

10. Plugging of the die to increase pressure was not

feasible, since the resultant prolonged cooking time

would cause degradation.

11. Optimum operating conditions to a produce fibrous

texture were found to be a temperature profile of

160-135-110 0C, 80 RPM, and 40% moisture for the

equipment used in this study.

Page 99: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

89

Chapter 9

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. The use of a cooling system would provide better

control of the dough temperature, resulting in better

control of bulk density. Frictional heat due to

mechanical work usually builds up at the screw section

and the die land.

2. The use of mechanical tests to evaluate the f i ber s '

quality, such as:

shear force - Warner-Bratzler shear,

shear force and work - Kramer Shear Press,(firmness and crispness)

texture measurement - General Food Texturometer,

and breaking strength - Instron, Model TM.

would yield better evaluation.

3. Extrusion should be attempted at lower temperature

gradients.

4. The feed system should be modi fied for better control

of feed ra te.

5. Horizontal extrusion causing a higher deformation would

produce better fibers.

6. Extrusion with the Leistritz twin screw extruder should

be attempted. Good shearing, flow control, and

controllable feed rate in the twin screw extruder will

provide a better control of the final texture of the

Page 100: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

90

soy protein product.

7. Higher die temperatures should be attempted.

8. Further study is needed to determine if soy protein

crystallization is affected by the independent

variables.

9. Computer simulation should facilitate better control of

the pressure, temperature, and screw speed.

Page 101: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1 • J • Ra k 0 sky , J • ~ • F0 0 d ~~!!!., Vol. ~ , p • 1a05(1970).

2. J.R. Collier, Research Proposal to the National ScienceFoundation (1983).

3 • J . ~1 • Ag ui 1era and F. V. K0 s i k 0 Wski, J. £.!. F0 0 d Sci.,Vol. il, pp. 647-651 (1976).

4. T.J. Maurice and D.W. Stanley, Canadian lnst. Food Sci.Te c hn 0 1. ~., Vol. .!.! ' No.1, pp. 1- 6"--TJan:-r9 7ar:-

5. n.v. Taranto et al., i. of Fo~~ ~.i., Vol. 40, pp.1264-1269 (1975).

6. J.M. Aguilera, F.V. Kosikowski, and L.F. Hood, J. ofFood ~!., ~l. !!. ' pp , 12 0 9 - 1 2 13 (1 9 76 ) • -

7. W.J. Wolf and F.l. Baker, Cereal Sci. Today, Vol • .!1.,No.5, pp. 125-147 (May 1972). --

8 . W.J. Wolf and F.L. Baker, American Assoc.Chem i s t s , Vol. g, pp. 38 7- 3 96 (I g-1"s-) •

of Cereal

9. J.L. Ko k i n i , J.B. Kadane, and r .t.. Cassler, J. TextureStudi e s , Vol. ~, p , 195 (1977).

10. R.A. Boyer, U.S. Patent No. 2,682,466, 1964.

11. O.B. Smith, in New Protein Foods, Vol. 2, Techno.l0,9,YPart S, edited bY A.A. Altschul, AcademTc Press, NewY0 r k , -1 9 76, p , 8 6 •

12. F.E. Horan, JAO~, Vol. g, p , 67A (1974).

13. O.B. Smith, in World Soybean Research, edited by L.D.Hill, the Interstate Printers and PUbTishers, Danville,11., 1976, p. 861.

14. Alonzo Feldbrugge, Marshal M. Rankowitz, and Cynthia K.Travers, in Food Pharmaceutical and Bioen~ineerin~

1976/77, edited by George T. Tsao, Vol. 74, No. 172,AIChE--,1978, pp. 148-152.

15. P.K. Strommer, U.S. Patent No. 3,754,926, 1973.

16. S.J. Circle, E.W. Meyer, and R.W. Whitney, Cereal Chern,Vol. i!, p. 157 (1964).

Page 102: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

92

17. Judson M. Harper, Letters, ~. £! Food ~£!, Vol. 44, No.3, p. ii (197gb).

18. H. Potter, Food Science, The - AVI Publishing Co.,Westport, CT.~68.

19. Sidney J. Circle and Alan K. Smith, in Sym£osium: SeedProteins, edited by G.E. Inglett, The AVI Publishing~-Westport,CT., 1972.

20. W.J. Wol f , Baker IS Q.i.[., Vol. 43, No.5, pp. 30-37(1969).

21. W.J. Wolf, J. Al!:. ~od Ch~~., Vol.~, p p , 969-976(1970).

22. M.F. Campbell, in World Soybean Research Conference II:proceed~, edited by--FrederTCI--r-: Corbin, pp.713-719.

23. D.W. Johnson,(1970).

J. Am. Oil Chern. ~.£. , Vol. !I, p , 402

24. S.E. Fleming et al., J. £! Food ~i., Vol. ~2., p , 188(1974).

25. F.E. Horan, Food Technology !.!1. Au~ralia, No. 11, pp.4 92 - 503 (N 0 v , 19 74T:

26. James S. Pagington, Inst. of Food Sci. ~~ Technol.,Vol. ~ , No.1, Pp , 41~ ( 1 975 )-.-

27. P.V.J. Hegarty and P.C. Ahn, J. of Food Sc t , , ~l· il,p , 1133 (1976). -

28. Herman V. Boenig, Structure and Proeerties of Polym~~,

John Wiley and Sons, New Yorr:-1973, p. Tb.--

29. S.H. Holay and J.M. Harper, "Plant ProteinTexturization under Varying Shear Environments,Detroit, Michigan, AIChE 1981 Summer National Meeting,August 18, 1981.

30. S.H. Holay and J.M. Harper, J. of Food Sc i . , Vol. 47,No.6, pp. 1869-1974 (1982). - -- ---- ---

31. Oak B. Smith, Food En9ineerin9.. Vol. 47, No.7, pp •48-50 (July 197~

32. C.H. Remsen and J.P. Clark, J. of Food Proc. ~., Vol.~, No.1, p. 39 (1978).

Page 103: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

93

33. Ashton et a l . , Scientific and Technical Survey, No. 62,p p , 3- 20 (A ug. 1970 ) • -- -----

34 • 0 • B. Cumm i ng, D. W. Stan 1ey, and J. ~1. De r,1 an, J. ~ F00 dSci ., Vol. l~ , pp • 320 - 323 (1 973 ) •

35. S.L. Jenkins, U.S. Patent 3,496,858, 1970 in GutchaFood Technology Review, No.1, Textured Foods andAllied Products, Noyes-Data Corp., Park Ridge, N.J.,1973.

36. L.D. Burgess and D.W. Stanley, J. Inst. Can. Sci.Technol., Alim~~, Vol. ~, No.4, pp. ~231~197b~

37.

38.

39.

Judson M. Harper, Extrusion of Foods, Vol. li, eRCPress, Boca Ra to n , Fla., 1981. -

K • Sa i 0 , M. Terashima, and T. Watanabe, J • of FoodSci. , Vo 1 • 40, pp. 541-544 (1975).-Judson M. Harper, Extrusion of Foods, Vo1 • !, CRe-r- - ---Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 981.

40. A.Peterlin, J. of Polym. Sci.: Par! f, No.9, p. 80(1965). --

41. W.A. Holmes-walker, Polymer Conversion, Applied SciencePublishers, London, 1976.

42. W.O. Statton, J. of Polym. Sci.: Part f., No. 20, pp.117-144 (1967):- -

43. J.R. Collier, T.Y.T. Tam, J. Newcome, and N. Dinos,Polym. ~. Sci., Vol • .!i, No.3, p • 204 (March 1976).

44. B.P. Pandya, M.S. Thesis, Chemical Engineering, OhioUniversity, 1981.

45. L. Holiday and I.M. Ward in Structure and Pro~ties ofOriented Polymers, edited by I.M. Ward:-ApprTed-SCTencePublishers, London, 1975, p. 18.

46. J.R. Collier, S.L. Chang, S.K. Upadhyayula, IIFlowInduced Crystallization," Monog,raph, No.6. (1979).

47. T.Y.T. Tam, Ph.D. Thesis, Chemical Engineering, OhioUniversity, 1975.

48. J. Newcome, Ph.D. Thesis, Chemical Engineering, OhioUniversity, 1976.

Page 104: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

94

49. S.K. Upadhyayula, M.S. Thesis, Chemical Engineering,Ohio University, 1978.

50. C.B. Rao, M.S. Thesis, Chemical Engineering, OhioUniversity, 1980.

51. K. Lakshmanan, M.S. Thesis, Chemical Engineering, OhioUniversity, 1980.

52. M. Barger, M.S. Thesis, Chemical Engineering, OhioUniversity, 1982.

53. G.H. Brown, Amer. ~i., Vol. 60, No.1, p , 64 (1972).

5 4 • Leo Man del k ern , Cry s tal 1 i z a t ion 0 f Pol ym~!~ , Mc Graw ­Hill, New York, 1964.

55. P.H. Geil, The Morphology of Crystallization Polymers,APreli min aryE ~1 MSEe d ucat ion mod u1e pre par ed for theASEE Meeting, Urbana, 11., June 1980.

56. O.M. Bigg et al., Polym. Enir. Sc i . , Vol. ~~, No.1,pp. 27-33 (Jan. 19821. -- - -

57. John T. Hayes et al., U.S. Patent No. 3,886,298,1975.

58. G. Puski and A.H. Konwinski, U.S. Patent No. 3,950,564,1976.

59. A. Felbrugge et al., U.S. Patent No. 3,886,299,1975.

60. Oak B. Smith, Inst. of Food Sci. and Technol., Vol. g,No.1, pp. 15-~March-yg19r:-

61. M.F. Campbell, JAO~, Vol. 58, pp. 336-338 (March1981).

62. Atkinson, U.S. Patent No. 3,488,770, 1970.

63. D. van Zuilichem, Inst. of Food Sci. ~~ Te£hnol., Vol.~, No.1, pp. 5-1~arCh 1929)-.-

64. J.M. Faubion, R.C. Hoseney and P.A. Seib, Cereal FoodsW0 r 1d , Vo 1. ~, No.5, Pp , 212 - 216 ( May 1982). ---

65. E.J. Briskey in Evaluation of Novel Protein Products,edited by A.E. Bender et al ~ Pergamon Press,---=tOronto,1970.

66. A.M. Hermansson, Lebensm. Wis. U. Technol., Vol. ~, No.1, pp. 24-29 (1972).

Page 105: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

67.

68.

95

Owen L. Davies, ed., The Desi~ and Analysis ofI nd us t ria 1 ExEe rim e n t s J lla1 nerlfUDl i s1iTn 9 ,---Y:V:-;-l 9bf ,p p , 495-578.

E.G.Henika, Cereal Sc!. radar, ~£l. !i, p. 309 (1972).

69. Daniel K. Tang, Senior Development Engineer, A.E.Staley, Mfg. Co., Personal Communication, 1983.

70. SAS Institute Inc., SAS Circle, P.O. Box 8000,Cary,N.C. 27511-8000.

71. Zehe v Ta?m0 r. and I mric h K1e in, En9 i nee r i n.[ Pr i .!!£!.e.1e sof Plastlcatlng Extrusion, Van Nostrand, Reinhold Co.,New York, 1970, p • 384

72. Y. Victor Wu and George E. Inglett, J. of Food Sc t • ,Vol. ~, pp. 218-225 (1974). - ----

73. T.F. Tsao, J.M. Harper and K.M. Repholz,Pharmaceutical and Bioe~~erin,[ 1967/ll,George T. Tsao, Vol. 74, No. 172, AIChE,142-147.

in Fooded i te<rby1978, pp ,

Page 106: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

APPENDICES

96

Page 107: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

APPENOIX ATable 7

Die Temperatures

97

===============================================================CONDITION TEMPERATURE (C)* SPEEO*

CODE ZONE II ZONE III ZONE IV (RPM)MOISTURE Die

(w/o)* Temp C===============================================================

AlA2A3A4

81628384

ClC2C3C4

DlD20304

E1E2E3E4

F1F2F3F4

G1G2G3G4

HIH2H3H4

I 1121314

140140140140

140140140140

140140140140

150150150150

150150150150

150150150150

160160160160

160160160160

160160160160

115115115115

115115115115

115115115115

125125125125

125125125125

125125125125

135135135135

135135135135

135135135135

90909090

90909090

90909090

100100100100

100100100100

100100100100

110110110110

110110110110

110110110110

406080

100

406080

100

406080

100

406080

100

406080

100

406080

100

406080

100

406080

100

406080

100

30303030

35353535

40404040

30303030

35353535

40404040

30303030

35353535

40404040

67.578.388.390.0

75.080.085.090.0

65.075.075.079.0

78.679.086.795.0

50.075.0

100.0100.0

75.075.080.090.0

80.688.694.3

100.0

80.091 . 795.092.1

75.082.590.090.0

Note: *Zone I was unheated, and Zone V washeated to 50 degrees Celsius.

Page 108: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Table 8 98Flo:w Rate s

CONDITION VO[.RATEEXT.RATE*CODE (in/min) (in3/hr)

=============================================Al 20.5 + 2. 7 38.4-A2 33.7 + 1 . 5 63.2

37.7-

70 . 7A3 + 3 . 144.0

-1.8 82.5A4 ±

B1 24.0 ± 0.5 45.082 23.7 ± 3 . 1 44.483 33.3 ± 0.9 62.484 44.1 ± 4 . 1 82.7

C1 19.0 + 2.8 35.6C2 29.0 + 2.9 54.4

32.2 - 3.2 60.4C3 +-C4 34.4 ± 3.4 64.5

01 24.0 + 2.5 45.0-02 22.3 ± O. 7 41.803 31.0 ± 3.8 58 . 104 44.3 ± 2.4 83.1

E1 7.5 ± 1 . 2 14. 1E2 16.5 + 2.2 30.9-E3 21.6 + 4.1 40.5E4 33.2 + 3.8 62.2

Fl 12.9 + 2.6 24.223.8

-1.3 44.6F2 +-

45.0F3 24.0 + 1 . 7F4 27.1 + 1 . 7 50.8

Gl 20.6 + 1.8 38.6G2 27.9

-2.5 52.3+

G3 30.8 + 2.2 57.8G4 45.7 -:;: 4.1 85.7-

HI 18.6 + 1 . 5 34.9H2 27.3 + 2.3 51.2-H3 31.7 + 2 . 7 59.4

42.9-

3.2 80.4H4 +-

11 13.2 ± 0.3 24.812 24.8 ± 3. 1 46.513 27.7 ± 1.4 51.914 28.9 ± 4.0 54.2

*90% confidence 1i mi t

Page 109: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Table 999

Pressure Profiles

============================================================CONDITION P R E S S U R E* ( psi )

CODE barrel die drop============================================================

Al 2742 ±124 1442 ± 45 1300 ± 85A2 2608 ± 45 1350 ± 70 1258 ± 58A3 2300 ±183 1150 ± 76 1150 ±.130A4 2075 ±109 1068 ± 75 1007 ± 92

81 864 ± 44 543 ± 42 321 ±. 4382 943 ±177 543 ± 42 400 ±. 8083 978 ± 36 629 ±. 25 350 ± 3184 1043 ± 73 621 ± 52 430 ±. 62

Cl 1207 ±332 664 ±281 528 ±300C2 985 ± 35 543 ± 36 372 ±. 35C3 980 ±116 480 ± 68 420 ±. 48C4 900 ± 50 450 ± 45 460 ± 23

01 1885 ±216 1157 ± 73 729 ±14502 1767 ±146 1150 ± 76 617 ±.lll03 1571 ±103 864 ±153 773 ±12804 1400 ±320 793 ±260 575 ±290

E1 680 ±213 310 ±111 270 .± 16 2E2 857 ±266 546 ±142 341 ±204E3 1000 ±.100 550 ±. 50 470 ± 25E4 1030 ±194 530 ± 75 550 ±135

Fl 540 ± 83 450 ± 87 80 ± 85F2 550 ± 76 441 ± 73 108 ± 74F3 558 ± 73 425 ±. 55 133 ± 64F4 557 ± 86 393 ± 49 170 ± 45

G1 1729 ± 45 950 ± 38 779 ± 41G2 1914 ±164 1012 ± 29 854 ±. 96G3 1800 ±141 900 ±130 900 ±136G4 1714 ±155 785 ± 99 917 ±127

HI 1120 ±117 710 ± 66 410 ±. 92H2 1071 ±.103 614 ± 35 457 ±.. 69H3 1121 ± 99 586 ± 44 535 ± 72H4 1150 ±. 60 560 ± 60 589 ±. 60

I 1 720 ± 24 470 ± 25 250 ± 4012 600 ± 50 363 ± 13 238 ± 1013 529 ± 70 321 ± 59 209 ± 6514 479 ± 36 300 ± 38 179 ± 37

*95S conffdence limit

Page 110: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Table 10Extrusion Characteristics

-~~-~-~---~-~~-----~~--~~~-----~--~~~~-----~­~~--~--~-~~~~-~~----~~-~-~~-----~~-------~-~~

100

CONDITIONCODE

ABSORP­TION(w/o)

Bulk den.(glee)

=============================================AlA2A3A4

81828384

C1C2C3C4

01020304

E1E2E3E4

FlF2F3F4

G1G2G3G4

HIH2H3H4

I 1121314

63.847.833.833.5

25.925.825.727.5

33.533.930.930.5

45.839.432.526.8

56.347.533.030.0

39.333.530.322.5

39.934.534.530.9

28.027.527.332.4

27.031.035.520.3

1.491.531.581.66

1.541 . 511.461.53

1.781.541.821 • 79

1.561.581.611.66

2.561.701.481.59

1.491.541.541.61

1 . 711.661.601.67

1.641.591.581.57

1.651.621.571.56

Page 111: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

Appendix B

101

FILE: c sj- r r S4S A

//H4J5eCS~ JOB (.// H6617~P~t15).XCSHll.PLPT

// EXEC 5-S•*------------RESpnNsE SUPF.rE ANALYSI3----------------*

THE QE5PCNSE SUPf=ACE AN·,\l.Y51 s -~s nr:pror.-~~D eNSOYBEAN PPOTEIN EXTTPU5TQN IN ~ELT Tn.NSF~RM_TtON

EXTRUSICN PROCESS. T~E 08JECTIV~ WAS TO OIscaVEPWHIC~ FACTOR VALUES (INDF~ENnENT VAPtAAL~~l

OPTIMIZE A RESPONSE. T~F P~P_METERS IN T~F M~OEL

_ERE EST[~ATEO BY THE LE~ST-snU'RES R~GRF~SIrN

THE RSPEG PROCEDUPE FI~ i~E PAPA~~~FPS OF ACO,.:JLETE QUADRAT IC RESPONSE ~UPF"_CE 4NO THENDETERMINED cPtTtC~L V~LU~S TC CP~I~T7~ ~H= PESP~N5E

WIT~ RESPECT TO T~E ~ACT~~S T~ ~~E MODEL

.-----------------------------------------------------*•O_TA A;INPUT y X I-X 3 G1a;

LABEL V=EXTPUSICN QATEXt=TEMPER4TUPEX2=SC REW c;PE E ')X.3=MO I STURE;

CARDS;20.5 140 40 30 24.0 140 40 35 19.0 16.0 40 40 ~4.0 150 40 30.33. 7 140 6J 30 23.7 16.e 60 .,c:: 2'1.0 16.V tiC 40 :!2.3 150 60 3037.7 140 AO 30 ~1.3 140 FiO ,! ~?2 1 A·O PO 40 , t , 0 150 80 ::10••• 0 140 100 30 44.1 140 100 35 ""'.4- 140 1 00 40 44."1 ISO 100 307.5 150 40 35 12.Q l~u 4\j 40 20.f» l~O 40 30 18.() IFt~ 40 15

16.5 150 60 35 23.8 150 60 J!: ;'7.1 1"0 1;0 ~c=; ';'7.' 160 60 ~5

21.6 150 eo 35 24..0 ISO 80 3~ '0.8 If,O ~o 35 :JI.7 160 80 ~5

33.2 150 IJJ 35 27. t I~O 100 :JS 4".7 1" 0 tOO J5 42.q 160 100 3513.2 160 40 40 24.£, 160 60 40 27.7 1(,0 ~o 40 ?P'.q t~O ro o 40.PRce SOR~: AY Xl-X3;PROC RSQEG;

\1C DEL V= x 1- X ~/ L .\ CK FIT;OAT_ B:

$--THE ACTUAL VALlES--;se T A EP\O=EC"F:OUTPUT;*--FOLLCWED BY _N X2*X3 GPIO ~n~ PLO~TING--;

I~ EOF THEN DC: Y:.; Xl=15~.6~pq;

00 )(2=40 TC 100 HV 1;00 X3= 2u TO 4-U 8V o.~;

OUTPUi: ENO; END; END;PRQC RSPEG DAT~=A OUl=C ppcnIC~ NOPP~NT:

,..OOEL V=XI-X3;D~ ,. ~ 0; SE T C; I F Xl =I 53 .66 eq ~

PAOe PLOl 04TA=O;PLOT X2*X3=V/CONTCUR=5 HPOS=~O VPCS:36:

TITLE CONTOuP PLOT OF 5CPE~ SPFEn (~P'~) ~Nf' ~ISTUPE (W'Cl;TITLE2 CCNTCUR~ APE EXTRUSYCN ~A~~~ (IN/~IN):

/.

Page 112: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

APPENDIX C

Table 11Regression Coefficient

102

Coefficients Extrusion Die Absorp- Bulk ProductRa te Pressure tion Density Temperature

~~--~------------~---~~~~---~-~~-~-~--~---------~~~~-~----~---

80 1719. 35479. -390.78 -11.80 258.82

B1 -23.22 -267.63 9.86 0.13 -4.55

82 0.35 -11.47 -2.15 0.00 1.27

83 2.31 -727.89 -11.73 0.21 4.97

B11 0.08 0.77 -0.04 0.00 0.02

822 0.00 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00

B33 0.06 7.40 0.07 0.00 -0.08

812 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 -0.01

B13 -0.04 0.85 0.03 0.00 0.01

823 0.00 0.31 0.03 0.12 -0.01

Page 113: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

df

Tab

le12

An

aly

sis

of

Var

ian

ce

Ex

tru

sio

nD

ieB

ulk

Ab

sorp

-R

ate

Pre

ssu

reD

ensi

tyti

on

Die

Tem

per

atu

re

Lin

ear

Qu

adra

tic

Cro

ssP

rod

uct

Lac

ko

fF

it

Err

or

R

3 3 3

20 6

.00

01

.00

01

.07

45

.25

96

.88

34

.00

01

.00

04

.22

76 1

.89

8

.84

02

.44

63

.88

45

.00

19

.14

01

.00

06

.62

76

.25

35

.21

28

.53

89

.00

01

.41

8

.87

72 1

.74

26

......

o w

Page 114: melt transformation extrusion of soy protein

VA

RIA

BLES

Tab

le13

Lev

els

of

Vari

ab

les

Sig

nif

ican

ce

onE

xtr

ud

ate

Ch

ara

cte

rist

ics

Ex

tru

sio

nD

ieB

ulk

Ab

sorp

-R

ate

Pre

ssu

reD

ensi

tyti

on

Pro

du

ctT

emp

erat

ure

Tem

per

atu

re.0

00

1.0

06

4.9

07

1.3

90

8.0

21

4

Scr

ewS

pee

d.0

00

1.0

5.5

78

.00

81

.00

01

~10

is

ture

.00

04

.00

01

.93

23

.06

54

.14

4

Reg

ress

ion

88.3

%89

.8%

14.0

%53

.89%

74.2

6%(R

-sq

uar

e)

~ o +::a