mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs

20
1 Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti- rheumatic drugs MICHAEL FORREST PETER M. BROOKS Inflammation is a highly complex process involving interactions between many mediators and cells (Figure 1). The essential purpose of inflammation can be regarded as a homeostatic process designed to detect the presence of injurious or potentially injurious stimuli within the tissues, to respond to such stimuli by mounting appropriate defensive measures aimed at removing these stimuli and finally to restore normal structure and function. These homeo- static processes are likely to be invoked continually throughout our lifespan, yet as a result of their efficiency we are rarely aware of their presence. When these processes are excessively or inappropriately stimulated we become aware of an inflammatory response and may choose to seek exogenous assistance in the form of pharmacological therapy to reduce the magnitude of that response. The inflammatory process has been described clinically in terms of five cardinal signs: heat, redness, swelling, pain and loss of function. One could add to this list the accumulation of leukocytes at an inflammatory lesion which, although not obvious on clinical examination, is clearly a feature common to all inflammatory disease. Although these cardinal signs may adequately describe the gross symptoms of inflammation, it is clear that many and varied phenomena underlie individual inflammatory conditions. A corollary to this statement is that a single drug is unlikely to cure an inflammatory disease in which multiple perturbations of mediator and cellular systems are involved. Paradoxically, single drug therapy utilizing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is common medical management of inflammatory joint disease and does provide considerable relief of these symptoms. The reason for this paradox is that the symptoms of inflammation can to a large extent be understood in terms of a single class of inflammatory mediators, the prostaglandins, whose generation from membrane-derived fatty acids (principally arachidonic acid) can be modified with NSAIDs. However, these drugs appear to have relatively little effect on the accumu- lation of leukocytes in inflammation and, furthermore, the underlying disease process continues relatively~unabated. The purpose of this chapter will be to review the evidence that NSAIDs may control the symptoms of Bailli~re's ClinicaIRheurnatology--Vol. 2, No. 2, August 1988 275

Upload: michael-forrest

Post on 18-Sep-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs

1

Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti- rheumatic drugs

M I C H A E L F O R R E S T P E T E R M. B R O O K S

Inflammation is a highly complex process involving interactions between many mediators and cells (Figure 1). The essential purpose of inflammation can be regarded as a homeostatic process designed to detect the presence of injurious or potentially injurious stimuli within the tissues, to respond to such stimuli by mounting appropriate defensive measures aimed at removing these stimuli and finally to restore normal structure and function. These homeo- static processes are likely to be invoked continually throughout our lifespan, yet as a result of their efficiency we are rarely aware of their presence. When these processes are excessively or inappropriately stimulated we become aware of an inflammatory response and may choose to seek exogenous assistance in the form of pharmacological therapy to reduce the magnitude of that response.

The inflammatory process has been described clinically in terms of five cardinal signs: heat, redness, swelling, pain and loss of function. One could add to this list the accumulation of leukocytes at an inflammatory lesion which, although not obvious on clinical examination, is clearly a feature common to all inflammatory disease. Although these cardinal signs may adequately describe the gross symptoms of inflammation, it is clear that many and varied phenomena underlie individual inflammatory conditions. A corollary to this statement is that a single drug is unlikely to cure an inflammatory disease in which multiple perturbations of mediator and cellular systems are involved. Paradoxically, single drug therapy utilizing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is common medical management of inflammatory joint disease and does provide considerable relief of these symptoms. The reason for this paradox is that the symptoms of inflammation can to a large extent be understood in terms of a single class of inflammatory mediators, the prostaglandins, whose generation from membrane-derived fatty acids (principally arachidonic acid) can be modified with NSAIDs. However, these drugs appear to have relatively little effect on the accumu- lation of leukocytes in inflammation and, furthermore, the underlying disease process continues relatively~unabated. The purpose of this chapter will be to review the evidence that NSAIDs may control the symptoms of

Bailli~re's ClinicaIRheurnatology--Vol. 2, No. 2, August 1988 275

Page 2: Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs

276 ~ . F O R R E S T A N D P . B R O O K S

C ~ ~ X

N

I ~ -~ ~-~L~4" ~ ~ ~ I~ ~1 ~

~. ~_ _ ~ \ ~~ .~_ ~ ~ ... '~

. ~ , .-- r c- O ~

~_ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ - ~ 0 l - - ~ ~

o . . . . ~ ' - - 0 ~ 0 @

o a ~ / / I E \

o , ~ - - - - - - I D

. ~ ~N

,-IN ~.~

Page 3: Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs

MECHANISM OF ACTION 277

inflammation by preventing the generation of proinflammatory prosta- glandins from arachidonic acid and that they also have additional effects. These effects include inhibition of the generation of lipoxygenase-derived metabolites of arachidonic acid, inhibition of polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMNL) function and modulation of immune responses. Ironically this last effect of the NSAIDs may serve to heighten certain immune-mediated inflammatory responses.

ARACHIDONIC ACID METABOLISM

Arachidonic acid is a 20 carbon unsaturated fatty acid derived from the phospholipid of cell membranes by the actions of various phospholipase enzymes. The precise mechanism by which phospholipases release arachi- donic acid is incompletely understood but appears to vary with both the cell type studied and the agents used to stimulate release (Bell et al, 1979; Hsueh et al, 1981; Clark et al, 1986). Inhibition of phospholipase, viainduction of the peptide lipocortin (previously referred to as macrocortin and lipomodulin) is one of the processes by which steroids exert their anti-inflammatory activity (Blackwell et al, 1980; Hirata et al, 1980). Arachidonic acid, in its unesterified form, can be metabolized by all mammalian cell types with the exception of mature erythrocytes. There are two major pathways for the metabolism of arachidonic acid (Figure 2). The cyclo-oxygenase enzyme system converts arachidonic acid to prostaglandins (for reviews see Samuelsson et al, 1978; Needleman et al, 1986) while lipoxygenases convert arachidonic acid to monohydroperoxy acids (HPETEs), monohydroxy acids (HETEs) and dihydroxy acids (diHETEs; leukotrienes B~, C4, D4 and E4) (for reviews see Needleman et al, 1986; Parker, 1987). Recent studies have demonstrated a new series of metabolites derived from oxygenation of arachidonic acid at the C4 position. These are known as lipoxins and seem to have biological activity in early studies (Samuelsson, 1985).

The cyclo-oxygenase enzyme initially generates two unstable endo- peroxides (prostaglandin G2 and prostaglandin H2) which are further metabolized via isomerases and reductases to the stable prostaglandins E2, D2 and F2~ or metabolized via either prostacyclin synthetase to prostacyclin (Moncada et al, 1976) or thromboxane synthetase to thromboxane A2 (Needleman et al, 1976). Following liberation of free arachidonic acid the spectrum of metabolites produced is in large part determined by the profile of enzymes available within particular cell types (Samuelsson, 1983). For example, endothelial ceils produce predominantly prostacyclin whereas platelets generate thromboxane A2 (see Moncada and Vane, 1979).

In mammalian systems there are three major lipoxygenase enzymes which differ in the particular double bond on the arachidonic acid molecule where enzymatic attack is initiated. These enzymes are a 5-1ipoxygenase found predominantlyin leukocytes (Borgeat et al, 1976), a 12-1ipoxygenase foundin platelets (Hamberg and Samuelsson, 1974; Nugteren, 1975) and a 15- lipoxygenase whose distribution is less well characterized but is certainly found in leukocytes, particularly eosinophils (Turk et al, 1982), and epithelial

Page 4: Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs

278 M. FORREST AND P. BROOKS

u.7 ~ -

"a -a "a u~ t - e- e-

e- e,- ~

~ - ~ - - ~

~ E g

x: E

~ 0 r "

"~ ~ o

-~ 2 .~ ~ ~. ~

o ~ ~ ~ .~ ~-~ ~. o > .o c -o ~ o

. - c~ -~-~ -~-~ .~ ~ U o

~ \ ~ =,~ ~-~ ..~ ~ ._ .:-

~ o ~ ~ o o

.- ~ 8 ~ E

, , , " ~ \ ,.~ ~ . ~ / ~ > ~ o

�9 ~ , \ -', ~ ~ ~

,...., q) o o ~ \

It~ ~ 0

~ '~

&

'1:D

�9

E 3

U

8

o

o o . . o

,,,..,

..=

" a

E 0 ,m

.o

0

.2.

'6 ,4

Page 5: Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs

MECHANISM OF ACTION 279

cells (Hunter et al, 1985). The lipoxygenase enzymes initially generate monohydroperoxy fatty acids (HPETEs) which undergo further transform- ations to produce monohydroxy acids (HETEs). The 5-1ipoxygenase enzyme may also generate a series of compounds called leukotrienes which contain a characteristic conjugated triene structure (Murphy et al, 1979). Leukotriene A4 is the substrate for either leukotriene A4 hydrolase to produce leukotriene B4 or glutathione-S-transferase to produce the sulphidopeptide leukotriene C4. The action of successive peptidases then metabolizes leukotriene C4 to leukotriene D4 and leukotriene E4. As with the generation of cyclo- oxygenase products there are differences in the profiles of lipoxygenase- derived arachidonic acid metabolites depending on the cell type, the species and the stimulus used. In general, leukocytes, platelets and mast cells are the major sources of lipoxygenase products, although they are also produced from epithelial cells (Hunter et al, 1985), keratinocytes (Brain et al, 1982; Grabbe et al, 1984) and blood vessels (Greenwald et al, 1979). There are reports on the synthesis of leukotriene B4 from lymphocytes (Goetzl, 1981), however this finding has not been repeated by other groups (Borgeat et al, 1985; Parker, 1987).

Role of arachidonic acid metabolites in inflammation

The view that metabolites of arachidonic acid play a role in inflammation arises from three lines of evidence. Firstly, the detection of arachidonic acid metabolites in inflammatory lesions; secondly, the ability of these purified compounds to mimic aspects of the inflammatory process and, finally, the observed effects of inhibitors of arachidonic acid metabolism on the inflammatory process.

Detection of arachidonic acid metabolites in inflammatory lesions

Prostaglandin E2, 6-oxo-prostaglandin FI~ (the stable breakdown product of prostacyclin), thromboxane B2 (the stable breakdown product of thromboxane A2) and leukotrienes B4, C4 and D4 have all been detected at relevant concentrations in a variety of both animal models of inflammation and in human inflammatory diseases (Table 1). This mass of data leaves little doubt that arachidonic acid metabolites are generated in inflammatory diseases although the relative amounts produced in particular models or human conditions varies considerably. For example, leukotriene B4 is found in high concentrations in the skin of patients with psoriasis (Brain et al, 1984) and in the synovial fluid of patients with gout, whereas its concentration in synovial fluid taken from patients with rheumatoid arthritis is low (Rae et al, 1982).

Proinflammatory properties of arachidonic acid metabolites

The proinflammatory properties of prostaglandin E2 and prostacyclin upon application in a variety of models include vasodilatation (Solomon et al, 1968; Williams, 1979), oedema formation in man and rats where the effect is

Page 6: Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs

280 M. FORREST AND P. BROOKS

Table 1. Some inflammatory lesions in which arachidonic acid metabolites have been detected.

Lesion Reference

Animal models Rat air pouch

Adjuvant arthritis Carrageenin granuloma Rat gastric ulcer model Rabbit hydronephrosis Rabbit myocardial infarction Rat brain ischaemia Human disease Gout Rheumatoid synovial fluid Psoriatic skin lesions

Human skin after allergic challenge Inflammatory bowel disease

Cystic fibrosis sputum Asthma Acute anterior nveitis Obstructive airways disease sputum

Ohuchi et al (1984) Brooks et al (1987) Parnham et al (1978) Ch~ing et al (1976) Basso et al (1983) Okegawa et al (1983) Barst and Mullane (1985) Moskowitz et al (1984)

Rae et al (1982) Klickstein et al (1980) Brain et al (1984) Brain et al (1985) Bisgaard et al (1985) Gould (1975) Sharon and Stenson (1984) Cromwell et al (1981) Green et al (1974) Eakins et al (1972) O'Driscoll et al (1984)

an indirect one via the degranulation of mast cells (Crunkhorn and Willis, 1971; Takagi et al, 1987) potentiation of oedema formation (Williams and Morley, 1973; Moncada et al, 1973), potentiation of neutrophil accumu- lation induced by other mediators (Issekutz and Movat, 1982) and hyper- algesia (Solomon et al, 1968; Ferreira, 1972). Lipoxygenase-derived products, particularly leukotriene B4, are both chemotactic and chemo- kinetic for a number of cell types including neutrophils, monocytes and eosinophils (Palmer et al, 1980; Bray, 1983). Leukotriene B4 increases vascular permeability via an interaction between neutrophils and vascular endothelial cells (Wedmore and Williams, 1981) and also interacts with neutrophils to stimulate a variety of cell functions including lysosomal enzyme release, generation of oxygen-free radicals and increased cellular adhesiveness (Naccache and Sha'afi, 1983). Leukotrienes C4 and D4 have variable effects on the microcirculation, being constrictor in some species (Peck et al, 1981) yet vasodilator in others (Bisgaard et al, 1982), and increase vascular permeability in some species but not others (Ueno et al, 1981).

THE EFFECTS OF NON-STEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGS (NSAIDs)

Effect of NSAIDs on the cyclo-oxygenase pathway of arachidonic acid metabolism

Perhaps the most compelling evidence for a role of arachidonic acid metabolites in inflammation arises from the use of inhibitors of the

Page 7: Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs

MECHANISM OF ACTION 281

generation of these products and the resultant effects on the inflammatory process. In 1971, Vane (see also Ferreira et al, 1971; Smith and Willis, 1971) demonstrated that a common property of NSAIDs was their ability to inhibit the cyclo-oxygenase enzyme responsible for the metabolism of arachidonic acid to prostaglandins. The known proinflammatory properties of prosta- glandins at that time led to the conclusion that the anti-inflammatory activity of NSAIDs could be attributed to their effects on the cyclo-oxygenase enzyme. Further support for this concept arose by demonstrating significant correlations between the concentrations of drug required to inhibit the cyclo-oxygenase enzyme (both in vivo and in vitro) and the concentrations of drug required to inhibit inflammation in experimental models (Higgs et al, 1976) and clinically (Robinson et al, 1978).

An apparent paradox was noticed when it was found that prostaglandins of the E series produced only modest increases in oedema formation when injected into the skin of either guinea-pigs (Williams and Morley, 1973) or rabbits (Williams and Peck, 1977). However, in these experiments it was found that prostaglandins could produce a significant potentiation of the oedema formation induced by the permeability-increasing mediators, hista- mine and bradykinin. These observations have since been extended to show that synergism exists between a wide range of permeability-increasing mediators and vasodilators in inducing oedema formation (Williams et al, 1983). This phenomenon is believed to be a result of prostaglandins increasing dermal blood flow and intravenular hydrostatic pressure. This contention is supported by the finding that the synergistic effect of prostaglandins and permeability-increasing mediators is less in the peritoneal cavity of animals where basal blood flow is higher (Forrest et al, 1986). One can therefore speculate that if inflammatory oedema formation is occurring in response to the generation of a wide range of permeability-increasing mediators together with a vasodilator prostaglandin, then NSAIDs will inhibit the oedema formation through inhibition ofprostaglandin synthesis. The ability to reduce inflammatory oedema through inhibition of a single class of compounds, the prostaglandins, will clearly be more satisfactory than trying to inhibit the generation or action of many different permeability-increasing mediators.

Effect of NSAIDs on the lipoxygenase pathway of arachidonic acid metabolism

Whereas there is a clear relationship between NSAIDs and inhibition of the cyclo-oxygenase pathway of arachidonic acid metabolism, the effect of these drugs on the generation of lipoxygenase-derived arachidonic acid metab- olites is less clear. For some NSAIDs such as indomethacin there is evidence that at low doses there is an increased generation of lipoxygenase products (Salmon et al, 1983; Robinson et al, 1986). The mechanism behind this potentiation is uncertain, although it has been suggested that by blocking the cyclo-oxygenase path more free arachidonic acid is available for metabolism by the lipoxygenase pathway (Salmon et al, 1983). An alternative expla- nation for this phenomenon is that prostaglandins normally serve to reduce the production of leukotrienes, inhibition of prostaglandin production

Page 8: Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs

282 M. FORREST AND P. BROOKS

will therefore result in increased generation of leukotrienes. Evidence for such a mechanism is suggested by the observation that E-type prosta- glandins can inhibit leukotriene B4 production in polymorphonuclear leuko- cytes (Ham et al, 1983) and that prostacyclin reduces the efflux of leukotriene C4 from perfused rat hearts (Karmazyn, 1987).

Inhibition of the 5-1ipoxygenase enzyme has been reported for a number of NSAIDs although the concentrations required are generally higher than those that are likely to be achieved therapeutically (Kitchen et al, 1985; Ku et al, 1985; Boctor et al, 1986). There also appear to be marked differences in the ability of NSAIDs to inhibit 5-1ipoxygenase depending on the species, cell type and stimulus used in different experiments (Kitchen et al, 1985). Some compounds have been produced which exhibit similar inhibitory activities against both the lipoxygenase and cyclo-oxygenase enzymes. One such compound, BW 755c (Higgs et al, 1979), was particularly effective at suppressing leukocyte infiltration in an animal model of inflammation but has subsequently proven too toxic for clinical use. Benoxaprofen was also reported to inhibit the 5-1ipoxygenase enzyme (Walker and Dawson, 1979), although this claim has been disputed (Salmon et al, 1984a,b). Again toxicity forced the withdrawal of this compound. There are also reports of NSAIDs inhibiting other lipoxygenase enzymes such as the peroxidase converting 12-HPETE to 12-HETE (Siegel et al, 1979) and of the 11- and 15-1ipoxygenase of rat neutrophils (Siegel et al, 1980).

In addition to direct effects on lipoxygenase enzymes, some NSAIDs have the ability to reduce the production of lipoxygenase products via other mechanisms. For example, aspirin and indomethacin have both been reported to show inhibitory activity against phospholipases A2 (Kaplan et al, 1978) and C (Bomalski et al, 1986; Clark et al, 1986). In addition, diclofenac reduces leukotriene production from leukocytes, not by an effect on either the lipoxygenase or phospholipase enzymes but apparently by stimulating the reincorporation of free arachidonic acid into triglycerides (Ku et al, 1986).

Anti-inflammatory effects of NSAIDs unrelated to inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase

There is an increasing body of evidence to suggcst that many of the anti- inflammatory effects of the NSAIDS arc unrelated to an inhibition of the cyclo-oxygenase enzyme system. Should this ultimately prove to be the case then a major implication is that novel drugs may be designed to exploit particular pharmacological properties of compounds with precise therapeutic activities and, hopefully, with minimal toxic side-effects.

In animal studies there was little difference in the potency of acetyl- salicylic acid and sodium salicylate against carrageenin-induced paw oedema (Niemegeers et al, 1964), and yet in vitro, acetylsalicylic acid is a more potent inhibitor of the cyclo-oxygenase enzyme (Vane, 1971). Furthermore, the dose of aspirin which is required to inhibit the generation of prostaglandins is considerably less than the amounts which are used therapeutically in the treatment of inflammatory joint disease (Atkinson

Page 9: Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs

MECHANISM OF ACTION 283

and Collier, 1981). It has been suggested that aspirin may act as a pro-drug for salicylate (Henderson et al, 1986) and that both drugs inhibit inflam- mation as a consequence of salicylate inhibiting prostaglandin E2 formation. An alternative explanation would be that salicylate (either administered or derived from aspirin) inhibits leukocyte accumulation by an effect indepen- dent of the inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase and that the reduced cell numbers are responsible for the observed reduction in prostaglandin levels.

We have recently demonstrated (Forrest et al, 1987a) that indomethacin (2-50 mg/kg body weight) and piroxicam (3-30 mg/kg body weight) inhibit lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced plasma leakage and polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMNL) accumulation in the rat subcutaneous air-pouch in a dose-dependent manner. The inhibition of plasma leakage is readily reversed by administering prostaglandin E2 together with the LPS, suggest- ing that prostaglandins play a role in mediating plasma leakage. Prosta- glandin E2 also reversed the inhibition of PMNL accumulation in indomethacin-treated animals but not that in piroxicam-treated animals. This clearly indicates that some NSAIDs have inhibitory effects on the inflammatory process quite unrelated to an inhibition of the cyclo-oxygenase enzyme.

Clinically there are also suggestions that a common mechanism of action for NSAIDs is unlikely. This view is proposed because there are some inflammatory joint diseases which respond particularly well to a particular NSAID; for example, the use of indomethacin in gout (Smyth and Percy, 1973) and of phenylbutazone in ankylosing spondylitis (Rosenbloom et al, 1985). It seems unlikely that this variability in response to particular NSAIDs in particular diseases can be explained solely on a pharmacokinetic basis; it is more likely to be due to pharmacodynamic factors (Day and Brooks, 1987).

Arachidonic acid metabolites, NSAIDs and their effect on neutrophil functions

The polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMNL) plays a major role in the genesis of inflammatory responses. It is the first cell type to accumulate in sub- stantial numbers in inflammatory lesions and predominantly serves the function of clearing both viable and non-viable particulate matter by the processes of phagocytosis and extracellular killing of microbial organisms. To this end the accumulation of PMNL in an inflammatory lesion is a useful defensive process. However, in inflammatory diseases the PMNL appear to be either excessively or inappropriately activated, such that their defensive roles become offensive. In this situation the cells can cause host tissue damage through the generation of reactive oxygen species and the release of lysosomal enzymes with the capacity to degrade connective tissues.

The principal biological activities of PMNL (Table 2) which become expressed during inflammation are: increased adhesiveness, allowing the cells to adhere initially to the vascular endothelium and subsequently to the connective tissue matrix; chemotaxis and chemokinesis for localizing PMNL at the inflammatory focus; phagocytosis of particulate material; the

Page 10: Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs

284 M. FORREST AND P. BROOKS

Table 2. Biological activities of polymorphonuclear leukocytes which become expressed during inflammation.

Phagocytosis Binding of immunoglobulin and complement Degranulation and release of lysosomal enzymes Oxygen radical generation Release of proteinases which liberate peptide mediators from plasma protein precursors

(kinins, angiotensin, C5a) Release of prostaglandin E2 and leukotriene B4

generation of reactive oxygen species; the release of lysosomal enzymes and an ability to control postcapillary venular permeability to plasma proteins. There is evidence that all of these functions can be modulated by both arachidonic acid metabolites and by inhibitors of arachidonic acid metab- olism (Abramson et at, 1983; Fantone, 1985).

The effect of NSAIDs on neutrophil function is complex and variable results are seen between in vivo and in vitro experiments. The reasons for this complexity are that although NSAIDs predominantly inhibit the cyclo- oxygenase pathway they also have both stimulatory and inhibitory effects on the lipoxygenase pathway, depending on the dose and the particular NSAID under consideration. Furthermore, it is apparent that some NSAIDs have effects on neutrophils quite unrelated to an effect on arachidonic acid metabolism.

Effects on neutrophil chemotaxis

In vivo effects

A number of experiments have shown NSAIDs to inhibit neutrophil accumulation in vivo during inflammatory responses initiated by a variety of stimuli (Walker et al, 1976; Ackerman et al, 1982; Shimanuki et al, 1985; Palder et al, 1986). However, an inhibition of PMNL accumulation by NSAIDs is not a general phenomenon and, indeed, some authors find an increase in cell numbers following treatment with NSAIDs (Eakins et al, 1980). These discrepancies may be explained partly on the basis of different doses of drugs being used in different models in response to different stimuli. Certainly the observation that lipoxygenase-derived arachidonic acid metabolites show potent chemotactic activity towards neutrophils both in vivo and in vitro would suggest that NSAIDs with an ability to inhibit the production of these compounds would be particularly useful at reducing cellular accumulation. Indeed Salmon et al (1983) have found that BW 755c does inhibit both leukotriene B4 production and neutrophil accumulation in carrageenin-soaked polyester sponges implanted subcutaneously in rats. Whether these effects are causally related is not clear, particularly as recent studies suggest that leukotriene B4 is not chemotactic for rat neutrophils either in vitro (Kreisle et al, 1985) or in vivo (Foster et al, 1986; Forrest, 1987b).

Our own experience using the rat subcutaneous air-pouch suggests that the

Page 11: Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs

MECHANISM OF ACTION 285

ability of NSAIDs to inhibit neutrophil accumulation is clearly dependent on the nature of the inflammatory stimulus used, which in turn will generate a different profile of inflammatory mediators. Thus, indomethacin (2 mg/kg i.v.) inhibits peptone-induced neutrophil accumulation by approximately 80% yet has only a marginal effect on monosodium urate (MSU) crystal- induced neutrophil accumulation (Figure 3). Despite this differential effect on cell accumulation, indomethacin inhibits plasma leakage induced by either stimulus to a similar extent (Figure 3). These results can be explained on the basis of different stimuli generating different chemotactic mediators. For example, if peptone stimulates neutrophil accumulation through activation of the complement system, then indomethacin could reduce cell accumu- lation by preventing plasma leakage and hence the supply of plasma-derived complement components. On the other hand, MSU crystals may be acting through the generation of a non-plasma-derived chemotactic factor. In this instance, although indomethacin has again reduced plasma leakage it has had no effect on the generation of chemotactic mediators.

2 x 107-

1 x l O 7-

~ 5 x 1 0 6 - _J Z

1 xlO'

700-

6oo-

r~ 5oo-

400

E. 300

200

100-

_ _ _ _ L~ __ 0 PBS MSU MSU Peptone Peptone

+ + indomethacin indomethacin

. . . .

PBS MSU MSU Peptone Peptone + +

indomethacin indomethacin

Figure 3. Inflammation was initiated in the rat subcutaneous air-pouch by injecting 10 ml of either 3% bacteriological peptone or 10 ml of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals (10 mg/ml) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Four hours later exudates were removed and analysed for the total amount of (a) plasma leakage and (b) the number of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNL). The effect of pretreating animals with indomethacin (2 mg/kg i.v.) was determined. Each bar represents the mean value for ten animals and vertical lines represent the sE mean.

In vitro effects

As with the in vivo effect of NSAIDs on neutrophil chemotaxis, these drugs exhibit variable in vitro effects depending on the source of the cells, the nature of the chemoattractant and the method used to assess chemotaxis (Kitchen et al, 1985). Furthermore, there has been a suggestion that the

Page 12: Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs

286 M. FORREST AND P. BROOKS

processes of chemotaxis and chemokinesis may be differentially susceptible to the effects of NSAIDs (Rivkin et al, 1976). There are reports of NSAIDs inhibiting neutrophil chemotaxis in vitro (Brown and Collins, 1977; Perianin et al, 1985; Nielsen and Webster, 1987). However, one can equally find reports demonstrating no effect of NSAIDs on chemotaxis in vitro (Perianin et al, 1984; Boot et al, 1985; Palder et al, 1986).

Effect of NSAIDs on the generation of superoxide and the release of lysosomal enzymes

An inhibition of the generation of superoxide anions and of the release of lysosomal enzymes is a property of many NSAIDs (Smolen and Weissman, 1980; Abramson et al, 1983; Minta and Williams, 1985). However, the ability of NSAIDs to inhibit these functions is clearly stimulus-dependent, such that FMLP-induced superoxide production and lysosomal enzyme release is inhibited by many NSAIDs, whereas PMA-induced production is not affected (Abramson et al, 1983; Nielsen and Webster, 1987). PMA is believed to stimulate PMNL by a direct activation of protein kinase C, whereas FMLP acts via a receptor-linked mechanism. It has been reported that NSAIDs can interfere with the binding of FMLP to this receptor, thus producing an inhibition of PMNL responses (Minta and Williams, 1985; Skubitz and Hammerschmidt, 1986). However, this is probably not the sole reason for their inhibitory action as ibuprofen can inhibit PMNL functions stimulated by a variety of ligands including FMLP, the complement derived peptide C5a and the particulate stimulus serum opsonized zymosan. This would suggest that ibuprofen was acting at some other stage in stimulus- response coupling (Nielsen and Webster, 1987).

Effect of NSAIDs on neutrophil aggregation and adhesion

The adhesion of neutrophils to each other (aggregation) and their adhesion to vascular endothelium are processes with important physiological and pathological consequences (Jacob, 1981, 1983). Although it is possible that these processes share common biochemical mechanisms, any extrapolation from drug effects on one process to the other should be treated with some caution. However, it is observed that of all the neutrophil processes influenced by NSAIDs, adherence (Nielsen and Webster, 1987) and aggre- gation (Kaplan et al, 1984) appear to be the most sensitive. Furthermore, inhibition of neutrophil aggregation is achieved by the majority of NSAIDs, whereas not all NSAIDs will inhibit other aspects of neutrophil activation such as lysosomal enzyme release (Abramson et al, 1983; Kaplan et al, 1984).

The accumulation of neutrophils within tissues during inflammation requires that the cells initially adhere to the vascular endothelium prior to their diapedesis through the vessel wall and subsequent migration to the inflammatory focus. One might therefore speculate that a drug which reduces neutrophil adhesion would produce a corresponding reduction in cell accumu- lation. This hypothesis is in part supported by the experiments of Ackerman

Page 13: Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs

MECHANISM OF ACTION 287

et al (1982) who found that both indomethacin and dexamethasone reduced the in vitro adhesion of neutrophils and the in vivo accumulation of neutro- phils. However, the anti-rheumatic drug levamisole inhibited the in vitro adhesion of neutrophils but not their in vivo accumulation, suggesting that there is not a simple relationship between these two processes.

Effect of NSAIDs on neutrophil-dependent inflammatory oedema formation

In 1981 Wedmore and Williams found that permeability-increasing mediators could be grouped into those that acted directly on vascular endothelium (for example, histamine and bradykinin) and those that had an indirect effect through an interaction between neutrophils and vascular endothelium. These indirectly acting mediators all share the common property of stimulat- ing neutrophils and include the complement-derived peptide C5a and leukotriene B4. Subsequently, Rampart and Williams (1986) have found that ibuprofen inhibits neutrophil-dependent oedema formation but not that induced by bradykinin.

Effect of prostaglandins and NSAIDs on the immune system

There is much evidence (Goodwin and Webb, 1980; Lewis, 1983; Goodwin, 1984) to support a role for prostaglandins in the immune response. This concept was proposed after observing that E-type prostaglandins inhibited a number of lymphocyte responses both in vitro (Smith et al, 1971; Morley, 1974; Gordon et al, 1976) and in vivo (Quagliata et al, 1973). That prosta- glandin production during the immune response played an immunoregu- latory role came from the work of Webb and Osheroff (1976) who found an increase in intrasplenic prostaglandin Fza following the injection of sheep red blood cells into mice. If mice were pretreated with indomethacin the rise in prostaglandin F2~ was abrogated, while an increase in splenic plaque- forming units was observed. This strongly suggested that prostaglandin production during the immune response was serving as a negative feedback mechanism to limit the magnitude of the immune response.

It is clear that prostaglandins exhibit many suppressive activities in cellular immune function (Table 3). One might predict therefore that NSAIDs would augment cellular immune function in vivo. This indeed has proven to be the case. For example, the delayed hypersensitivity response to Mycobacterium in guinea pigs was greatly enhanced by the simultaneous administration of indomethacin (Muscoplat et al, 1978). Furthermore, in normal human subjects indomethacin failed to enhance delayed hyper- sensitivity responses (Goodwin et al, 1978a) but was effective in a group of patients with depressed cellular immunity (Goodwin et al, 1978b).

The effect of pr0staglandins on the humoral immune response is mostly achieved through effects on T cell regulation (Goodwin, 1984). The activity of suppressor T cells appears to be inhibited by prostaglandin E2. Thus, stimu- lation of antibody from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in response to pokeweed mitogen is inhibited by pretreatment of cell cultures

Page 14: Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs

288 M. FORREST AND P. BROOKS

Table 3. Immunomodulatory activity of arachidonic acid metabolites.

Metabolite Action

LTB4

PGE2

PMN aggregation Enhanced C3B receptor expression on PMN Chemotaxis of PMN and eosinophils induces superoxide production

May inhibit suppressor T cells May increase mitogen-induced proliferation Inhibits lymphokine production Regulates B-cell immunoglobulin production

From Ford-Hutchinson, 1984; Goodwin et al, 1984; Kunkel and Chensue, 1984.

with NSAIDs and this effect can be reversed with physiological doses of prostaglandin E2 (Ceuppens and Goodwin, 1982a). These phenomena are abolished if the cell cultures are depleted of suppressor T cells. Comparable results are found when looking at rheumatoid factor production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from rheumatoid arthritis patients (Ceuppens and Goodwin, 1982b).

Although NSAIDs are used so extensively in the treatment of inflam- matory disease, where they play an important role in the alleviation of symptoms, it is likely that they may in fact be contributing to the chronicity of the disease. This will arise because NSAIDs inhibit the production of prostaglandins which play a role in feedback inhibition of the immune response.

CONCLUSION

There can be little doubt that metabolites of arachidonic acid play many functional roles in both inflammation and immunity. The fact that we can inhibit the generation of these compounds with relative ease, yet cannot cure inflammatory or immunologically based diseases, suggests a complex interrelationship between eicosanoids and inflammation. This complexity is compounded by both physiological and biochemical interactions between different eicosanoids, some of which are incompletely understood (Borgeat et al, 1983). It is most important that we should fully understand the biochemistry of eicosanoid metabolism, such that we may subsequently be able to understand the effects of drugs. It is feasible that our currently available drugs are interfering at an inappropriate stage in eicosanoid metabolism and that greater benefit may be derived through the use of compounds with a more selective action against particular metabolites of arachidonic acid.

It is also apparent that some of the biological effects of the NSAIDs are not related to effects on arachidonic acid metabolism. This provides the tantalizing possibility that novel anti-inflammatory drugs could be developed with effects quite unrelated to an inhibition of arachidonic acid metabolism.

Page 15: Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs

MECHANISM OF ACTION 289

REFERENCES

Abramson S, Edelson H, Kaplan H, Given W & Weissmann G (1983) The neutrophil in rheumatoid arthritis: its role and the inhibition of its activation by nonsteroidal anti- inflammatory drugs. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism 13 (supplement 1): 148-153.

Ackerman N, Martinez S, Thieme T & Mirkovich A (1982) Relationship between adherence, chemotaxis and the accumulation of rat polymorphonuclear leukocytes at an inflammatory site. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 221: 701-707.

Atkinson DC & Collier HOJ (1981) Salicylates: molecular mechanism of therapeutic action. Advances in Pharmacology and Chemotherapy 17: 233-288.

Barst S & Mullane K (1985) The release of a leukotriene D4-1ike substance following myo- cardial infarction in rabbits. European Journal of Pharmacology 114: 383-387.

Basso N, Materia A, Forlini A, Rossi P & Jaffe BM (1983) Gastric mucosal prostaglandin generation in rats with stress ulcer. Advances in Prostaglandin, Thromboxane and Leuko- triene Research 11: 383-388.

Bell RL, Kennerley DA, Stanford N & Majerus PW (1979) Diglyceride lipase: a pathway for arachidonate release from human platelets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 76: 3238-3241.

Bisgaard H, Kristensen J & Sondergaard J (1982) The effect of leukotriene Ca and D4 on cutaneous blood flow in humans. Prostaglandins 23: 797-801.

Bisgaard H, Ford-Hutchinson AW, Charleson S & Taydorf E (1985) Production of leuko- trienes in human skin and conjunctival mucosa after specific allergen challenge. Allergy 40: 417-423.

Blackwell G J, Carnuccio R, DiRosa M, Flower RJ, Parente L & Persico P (1980) Macrocortin: a polypeptide causing the anti-phospholipase effect of glucocorticoids. Nature 287: 147- 149.

Boctor AM, Eickholt M & Pugsley TA (1986) Meclofenamate sodium is an inhibitor of both the 5-1ipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase pathways of the arachidonic acid cascade in vitro. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Medicine 23: 229-238.

Bomalski JS, Hirata F & Clark MA (1986) Aspirin inhibits Phospholipase C. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 139: 115-121.

Boot JR, Kitchen EA, Walker JR, Harvey J & Dawson W (1985) Directional movement of cells in vivo and in vitro under the influence of 5-1ipoxygenase inhibitors. British Journal of Dermatology 113 (supplement 28): 168-176.

Borgeat P, Hamberg M & Samuelsson B (1976) Transformation of arachidonic acid and dihomo-u acid by polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Journal of Biological Chemistry 251: 7816-7820.

Borgeat P, Fruteau de Laclos B & Maclouf J (1983) New concepts in the modulation of leukotriene synthesis. Biochemical Pharmacology 32: 381-387.

Borgeat P, Sirois P, Braquet P & Rola-Pleszczynski M (1985) Leukotrienes and inflammation. In Cohen MM (ed.) Biological Protection with Prostaglandins, vol. 1, pp 13-26. Florida: CRC Press.

Brain SD, Camp RDR, Leigh IM & Ford-Hutchinson AW (1982) The synthesis of leukotriene Bz-like material by cultured human keratinocytes. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 78: 328.

Brain SD, Camp RDR, Dowd PM, Black AK & Greaves MW (1984) The release of leukotriene B4-1ike material in biologically active amounts from the lesional skin of patients with psoriasis. Journal of lnvestigative Dermatology 83: 70--73.

Brain SD, Camp RDR & Kobza-Black A (1985) Leukotrienes C4 and D4 in psoriatic skin lesions. Prostaglandins 29: 611-619.

Bray MA (1983) Pharmacology and pathophysiology of leukotriene B4. British Medical Bulletin 39: 249-254.

Brooks PM, Burton D & Forrest MJ (1987) Crystal induced inflammation in the rat sub- cutaneous air pouch. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 90: 413-419.

Brown KA & Collins AJ (1977) Action of nonsteroidal, anti-inflammatory drugs on human and rat peripheral leukocyte migration in vitro. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 36: 239-243.

Ceuppens J & Goodwin JS (1982a) Endogenous prostaglandin E enhances polyclonal immuno-

Page 16: Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs

290 M. FORREST AND P. BROOKS

globulin production by tonically inhibiting T suppressor cell activity. Cellular Immunology 70: 41-54.

Ceuppens J & Goodwin JS (1982b) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents inhibit the synthesis of IgM rheumatoid factor in vitro. Lancet i: 528-533.

Chang WC, Murota S-I & Tsuryfuji S (1976) A new prostaglandin transformed from arachidonic acid in carrageenin-induced granuloma. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Com- munications 72: 1259-1264.

Clark MA, Bomalski JS, Conway TM, Wartell J & Crooke ST (1986) Differential effects of aspirin and dexamethasone on phospholipase A2 and C activities and arachidonic acid release from endothelial cells in response to bradykinin and leukotriene D4. Prosta- glandins 32: 703-708.

Cromwell D, Walport MJ, Morris HR et al (1981) Identification of leukotrienes D and B in sputum from cystic fibrosis patients. Lancet ii: 164-165.

Crunkhorn P & Willis AC (1971) Cutaneous reactions to intradermal prostaglandins. British Journal of Pharmacology 41: 49-56.

Day RO & Brooks PM (1987) Variations in response to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 23: 655-658.

Eakins KE, Whitelocke RAF, Bennett A & Martenet AC (1972) Prostaglandin-like activity in ocular inflammation. British Medical Journal 111: 452-453.

Eakins KE, Higgs GA, Moncada S, Mugridge KG & Vane JR (1980) The effects ofindomethacin and BW 755c on leukocyte migration and prostaglandin production in carrageenin-induced inflammation. British Journal of Pharmacology 69: 270P-271P.

Fantone JC (1985) Mechanisms of chemotactic factor stimulation of polymorphonuclear leukocytes: modulation by prostaglandins. In Higgs GA & Williams TJ (eds) Inflammatory Mediators, pp 12%148. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Ferreira SH (1972) Prostaglandins, aspirin-like drugs and analgesia. Nature 240: 200-203. Ferreira SH, Moncada S & Vane JR (1971) Indomethacin and aspirin abolish prostaglandin

release from the spleen. Nature 231: 237-239. Ford-Hutchinson AW (1984) Leukotrienes as potential mediators of inflammation. Advances

in Inflammation Research 7: 29-37. Forrest MJ, Jose PJ & Williams TJ (1986) Kinetics of the generation and action of chemical

mediators in zymosan-induced inflammation of the rabbit peritoneal cavity. British Journal of Pharmacology 89: 719-730.

Forrest MJ, Zammit V & Brooks PM (1987) Reversible and irreversible inhibition of neutro- phil chemotaxis by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. British Journal of Pharmacology.

Forrest M J, Zammit V & Brooks PM (1988) Inhibition of leukotriene B4 synthesis by BW 755c does not reduce monosodium urate crystal-induced polymorphonuclear leukocyte accumulation. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 47: 241-246.

Foster SJ, McCormick ME, Howarth A & Aked D (1986) Leukocyte recruitment in the subcutaneous sponge implant model of acute inflammation in the rat is not mediated by leukotriene B4. Biochemical Pharmacology 35: 1709-1717.

Goetzl EJ (1981) Selective feedback inhibition of the 5-1ipoxygenation of arachidonic acid in human T-lymphocytes. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 101: 344- 350.

Goodwin JS (1984) Immunologic effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. American Journal of Medicine 77(4B): 7-15.

Goodwin JS & Webb DR (1980) Regulation of the immune response by prostaglandins. Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology 15: 106--122.

Goodwin JS, Selinger DS, Messner RP & Reed WP (1978a) Effect of indomethacin in vivo on humoral and cellular immunity in humans. Infection and Immunity 19: 430-437.

Goodwin JS, Bankhurst AD, Murphy S, Selinger DS, Messner RP & Williams RC (1978b) Partial reversal of the cellular immune defect in common variable immunodeficiency with indomethacin. Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Immunology 1: 197-204.

Goodwin JS, Ceuppens JL & Guade N (1984) Control of the immune response in humans by prostaglandins. Advances in Inflammation Research 7: 79-92.

Gordon D, Bray M & Morley J (1976) Control of lymphokine secretion by prostaglandins. Nature 262: 401-407.

Gould SR (1975) Prostaglandins, ulcerative colitis and sulphasalazine. Lancet ii: 988-989. Grabbe J, Czarnetzki BM & Mardin M (1984) Release of lipoxygenase products of arachidonic

Page 17: Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs

MECHANISM OF ACTION 291

acid from freshly isolated human keratinocytes. Archives of Dermatological Research 276: 128-130.

Green K, Hedqvist P & Svanborg N (1974) Increased 15-keto-13,14 dihydro prostaglandin F2,~ after allergen provoked asthma in man. Lancet i i: 1419-1421.

Greenwald JE, Bianchine JR & Wong LK (1979) The production of the arachidonate metabolite HETE in vascular tissue. Nature 281: 588-589.

Ham EA, Soderman DD, Zanetti ME, Dougherty HW, McCauley E & Kuehl FA (1983) Inhibition by prostaglandins of leukotriene B4 release from activated neutrophils. Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 80: 4349-4353.

Hamberg M & Samuelsson B (1974) Prostaglandin endoperoxides. Novel transformations of arachidonic acid in human platelets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 71: 3400-3404.

Henderson B, Higgs GA, Salmon JA & Vane JR (1986) Is aspirin a pro-drug for salicylate? British Journal of Pharmacology 88: 400P.

Higgs GA, Harvey EA, ~Ferreira SH & Vane JR (1976~ The effects of antiinflammatory drugs on the production of prostaglandins in vivo. In Samuelsson B & Paoletti R (eds) Advances in Prostaglandin and Thromboxane Research, vol. 1, pp 105-110. New York: Raven Press.

Higgs GA, Flower RJ & Vane JR (1979) A new approach to antfinflammatory drugs. Bio- chemical Pharmacology 28: 1959-1961.

Hirata F, Schiffman E, Venkatsubramanian K, Solomon D & Axelrod J (1980) A phospho- lipase A2 inhibitory protein in rabbit neutrophils induced by glucocorticoids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 77: 2533-2536.

Hsueh W, Desai U, Gonzalez-Crussi F, Lamb R & Chu A (1981) Two phospholipase pools for prostaglandin synthesis in macrophages. Nature 290: 710-713.

Hunter JA, Finkbeiner WE, Nadel JA, Goetzl EJ & Holtzman MJ (1985) Predominant generation of 15-1ipoxygenase metabolites of arachidonic acid by epithelial cells from human trachea. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 82: 4633- 4637.

Issekutz AC & Movat HZ (1982) The effect of vasodilator prostaglandins on polymorpho- nuclear leukocyte infiltration and vascular injury. American Journal of Pathology 107: 300-309.

Jacob HS (1981) The role of activated complement and granulocytes in shock states and myocardial infarction. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 98: 645-653.

Jacob HS (1983) Neutrophil activation as a mechanism of tissue injury. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism 13 (supplement 1): 144-147.

Kaplan L, Weiss J & Elsbach P (1978) Low concentrations of indomethacin inhibit phospho- lipase A2 of rabbit polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 75: 2955-2958.

Kaplan HB, Edelson HS, Korchak HM, Given WP, Abramson S & Weissmann G (1984) Effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents on human neutrophil functions in vitro and in vivo. Biochemical Pharmacology 33: 371-378.

Karmazyn M (1987) Calcium paradox-evoked release of prostacyclin and immunoreactive leukotriene C4 from rat and guinea-pig hearts. Evidence that endogenous prostaglandins inhibit leukotriene biosynthesis. JournalofMolecular and Cellular Cardiology 19: 221-230.

Kitchen EA, Dawson W, Rainsford KD & Cawston T (1985) Inflammation and possible modes of action of antiinflammatory drugs. In Rainsford KD (eds) Antiinflammatory and Anti- rheumatic Drugs, vol. 1, pp 21-87. Florida: CRC Press.

Klickstein LB, Shapleigh C & Goetzl EJ (1980) Lipoxygenation of arachidonic acid as a source of polymorphonuclear leukocyte chemotactic factors in synovial fluid and tissue in rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis. Journal of ClinicalInvestigation 66:1166-1170.

Kreisle RA, Parker CW, Griffin GL, Senior RM & Stenson WF (1985) Studies of leukotriene B4 specific binding and function in rat polymorphonuclear leukocytes: absence of a chemotactic response. Journal oflmmunology 134: 3356-3363.

Ku EC, Lee W, Kothari HV, Kimble EF, Liauw L & Tjan J (1985) The effects of diclofenac sodium on arachidonic acid metabolism. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism 15 (supplement 1): 36-41.

Ku EC, Lee W, Kothari HV & Scholer DW (1986) Effect of diclofenac sodium on the arachidonic acid cascade. American Journal of Medicine 80(4B): 18--23.

Page 18: Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs

292 M. FORREST AND P. BROOKS

Kunkel SL & Chenue SW (1984) Prostaglandin and the regulation of immune responses. Advances in Inflammation Research 7: 93-109.

Lewis GP (1983) Immunoregulatory activity of metabolites of arachidonic acid and their role in inflammation. British Medical Bulletin 39: 243-248.

Minta JO & Williams MD (1985) Some nonsteroidal drugs inhibit the generation of superoxide anions by activated polymorphs by blocking ligand-receptor interactions. Journal of Rheumatology 12: 751-757.

Moncada S & Vane JR (1979) Pharmacology and endogenous roles of prostaglandin endo- peroxides, thromboxane A2 and prostacyclin. Pharmacological Reviews 30: 293-331.

Moncada S, Ferreira SH & Vane JR (1973) Prostaglandins, aspirin-like drugs and the oedema of inflammation. Nature 246: 217-219.

Moncada S, Gryglewski R, Bunting S & Vane JR (1976) An enzyme isolated from arteries transforms prostaglandin endoperoxides to an unstable substance that inhibits platelet aggregation. Nature 263: 663-665.

Morley J (1974) Prostaglandins and lymphokines in arthritis. Prostaglandins 8: 315-326. Moskowitz MA, Kiwak KJ, Hekemian K & Levine L (1984) Synthesis of compounds with

properties of leukotrienes C4 and D4 in gerbil brains.after ischaemia and reperfusion. Science 224: 886-889.

Murphy RC, Hammarstrom S & Samuelsson B (1979) Leukolriene C: a slow-reacting substance from murine mastocytoma cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 76: 4275-4279.

Muscoplat CC, Rakich PM, Thoen CO & Johnson DW (1978) Enhancement of lymphocyte blastogenic and delayed hypersensitivity skin responses by indomethacin. Infection and Immunity 20: 627-632.

Naccache PH & Sha'afi RI (1983) Arachidonic acid, leukotriene B4, and neutrophil activation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 414: 125-139.

Needleman P, Moncada S, Bunting S, Vane JR, Hamberg M & Samuelsson B (1976) Identification of an enzyme in platelet microsomes which generates thromboxane As from prostaglandin endoperoxides. Nature 261: 558-560.

Needleman P, Turk J, Jakschik BA, Morrison AR & Lefkowith JB (1986) Arachidonic acid metabolism. Annual Review of Biochemistry 55: 6%102.

Nielsen VG & Webster RO (1987) Inhibition of human polymorphonuclear leukocyte functions by ibuprofen. Immunopharmacology 13: 61-71.

Niemegeers CJ, Verbruggen FJ & Janssen PA (1964) Effect of various drugs on carrageenin- induced oedema in the rat hind paw. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 16: 810-816.

Nutgeren DH (1975) Arachidonate lipoxygenase in blood platelets. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 380: 29%307.

O'Driscoll BR, Cromwell I & Kay AB (1984) Sputum leukotrienes in obstructive airways disease. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 55: 397-404.

Ohuchi K, Watanabe M & Levine L (1984) Arachidonate metabolism in acute and chronic allergic air pouch inflammation in rats and the anti-inflammatory effects of indomethacin and dexamethasone. International Archives of Allergy and Applied Immunology 75: 157-163.

Okegawa T, Jonas PE, De Schryver K, Kawasaki A & Needleman P (1983) Metabolic and cellular alterations underlying the exaggerated renal prostaglandin and thromboxane synthesis in ureter obstruction in rabbits. Journal of Clinical Investigation 71: 81-90.

Palder SB, Huval W, Lelcuk S e t al (1986) Reduction of polymorphonuclear leukocyte accumulations by inhibition of cyclooxygenase and thromboxane syntase in the rabbit. Surgery 99: 72-81.

Palmer RMJ, Stepney R J, Higgs GA & Eakins KE (1980) Chemokinetic activity of arachidonic acid and lipoxygenase products on leukocytes of different species. Prostaglandins 20: 411-418.

Parker CW (1987) Lipid mediators produced through the lipoxygenase pathway. Annual Review of lmmunology 5: 65-84.

Parnham M J, Bonta IL & Adolfs MJP (1978) Cyclic AMP and prostaglandin E in perfusates of rat hind paws during the development of adjuvant arthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 37: 218-224.

Peck MJ, Piper PJ & Williams TJ (1981) The effect of leukotrienes C4 and D4 OI1 the microvasculature of guinea-pig skin. Prostaglandins 21: 315-321.

Page 19: Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs

MECHANISM OF ACTION 293

Perianin A, Roch-Arveiller M, Giroud J-P & Hakim J (1984) In vivo interaction of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs on the locomotion of neutrophils elicited by acute non-specific inflammations in the rat--effect of indomethacin, ibuprofen and flurbiprofen. Biochemical Pharmacology 33: 2239-2243.

Perianin A, Gougerot-Pocidalo M-A, Giroud J-P & Hakim J (1985) Diclofenac sodium, a negative chemokinetic factor for neutrophil locomotion. Biochemical Pharmacology 34: 3433-3438.

Quagliata F, Lawrence VJW & Phillips-Quagliata JM (1973) Prostaglandin E1 as a regulator of lymphocyte function. Selective action on B lymphocytes and synergy with procarbazine in depression of immune responses. Cellular Immunology 6: 457-465.

Rae SA, Davidson EM & Smith MJH (1982) Leukotriene B4, an inflammatory mediator in gout. Lancet ii: 1122-1124.

Rampart M & Williams TJ (1986) Suppression of inflammatory oedema by ibuprofen involving a mechanism independent of cyclooxygenase inhibition. Biochemical Pharmacology 35: 581-586.

Rivkin I, Foschi GV & Rosen CH (1976) Inhibition of in vitro neutrophil chemotaxis and spontaneous motility by anti-inflammatory agents. Proceedings of the Society for Experi- mental Biology and Medicine 153: 236-240.

Robinson DR, McGuire MB, Bastian D, Kantrowitz F & Levine L (1978) The effects of anti-inflammatory drugs on prostaglandin production by rheumatoid synovial tissue. Prostaglandins and Medicine 1: 461-477.

Robinson DR, Skoskiewicz, M, Bloch KJ et al (1986) Cyclooxygenase blockade elevates leukotriene E4 production during acute anaphylaxis in sheep. Journal of Experimental Medicine 163: 1509-1517.

Rosenbloom D, Brooks P, Bellamy N & Buchanan W (1985) Clinical trials in the Rheumatic Diseases, p 265. New York: Praeger.

Salmon JA, Simmons PM & Moncada S (1983) The effects of BW 755c and other anti- inflammatory drugs on eicosanoid concentrations and leukocyte accumulation in experimentally-induced acute inflammation. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 35: 808-813.

Salmon JA, Tilling LC & Moncada S (1984a) Benoxaprofen does not inhibit formation of leukotriene B4 in a model of acute inflammation. Biochemical Pharmacology 33: 2928- 2930.

Salmon JA, Higgs GA, Tilling L, Moncada S & Vane JR (1984b) Mode of action of benoxa- profen. Lancet i: 848.

Samuelsson B (1983) Leukotrienes: mediators of immediate hypersensitivity reactions and inflammation. Science 230: 568-575.

Samuelsson B (1985) Leukotrienes and related compounds. Advances in Prostaglandin, Thromboxane and Leukotriene Research 15: 1-9.

Samuelsson B, Goldyne M, Granstrom E, Hamberg M, Hammarstrom S & Malmsten C (1978) Prostaglandins and thromboxanes. Annual Review of Biochemistry 47: 997-1029.

Sharon P & Stenson WF (1984) Enhanced synthesis of leukotriene B4 by colonic mucosa in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 86: 453-460.

Shimanuki T, Nakamura RM & diZerega GS (1985) In vivo modulation of leukotaxis by non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Agents and Actions 17: 80--83.

SiegelMI, McConnell RT & Cuatrecasas P (1979) Aspirin-like drugs interfere with arachidonate me tabolism by inhibition of the 12-hydroperoxy-5,8,10,14-eicos atetraenoic acid pe roxidase activity of the lipoxygenase pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 76: 3774-3778.

Siegel MI, McConnell RT, Porter NA et al (1980) Aspirin-like drugs inhibit arachidonic acid metabolism via lipoxygenase and cyclo-oxygenase in rat neutrophils from carrageenin pleural exudates. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 92: 688-695.

Skubitz KM & Hammerschmidt DE (1986) Effects of ibuprofen on chemotactic peptide- receptor binding and granulocyte response. Biochemical Pharmacology 35: 3349-3354.

Smith JB & Willis AL (1971) Aspirin selectively inhibits prostaglandin production in human platelets. Nature 231: 235-237.

Smith JW, Steiner AL & Parker CW (1971) Human lymphocytic metabolism. Effects of cyclic and non-cyclic nucleotides on stimulation by phytohaemagglutinin. Journal of Clinical Investigation 50: 442-448.

Page 20: Mechanism of action of non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs

294 M. FORREST AND P. BROOKS

Smolen JE & Weissmann G (1980) Effects of indomethacin, 5,8,11,14-eicosatetraynoic acid and p-bromophenacyl bromide on lysosomal enzyme release and superoxide anion generation by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Biochemical Pharmacology 29: 533-538.

Smyth CJ & Percy JS (1973) Comparison of indomethacin and phenylbutazone in acute gout. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 32: 351-353.

Solomon IM, Juhlin L & Kirschenbaum MB (1968) Prostaglandins on cutaneous vasculature. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 51: 280-282.

Takagi T, Forrest MJ & Brooks PM (1987) A pharmacological and histological examination of the microcirculation of the rat subcutaneous air-pouch. Pathology 19: 294-298.

Turk J, Maas RL, Brash AR, Jackson Roberts II L & Oates JA (1982) Arachidonic acid 15-1ipoxygenase products from human eosinophils. Journal of Biological Chemistry 257: 7068-7076.

Ueno A, Tanaka K, Katori M, Hayashi M & Arai Y (1981) Species differences in increased vascular permeability by synthetic leukotriene C4 and D4. Prostaglandins 21: 637-648.

Vane JR (1971) Inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis as a mechanism of action tor the aspirin- like drugs. Nature 231: 232-235.

Walker JR & Dawson W (1979) Inhibition of rabbit PMN lipoxygenase activity bybeno• Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 31: 778-780.

Walker JR, Smith MJH & Ford-Hutchinson AW (1976) Anti-inflammatory drugs, prosta- glandins and leukocyte migration. Agents and Actions 6: 602-606.

Webb DR & Osheroff PL (1976) Antigen stimulation of prostaglandin synthesis and control of immune responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 73: 1300--1304.

Wedmore CV & Williams TJ (1981) Control of vascular permeability by polymorphonuclear leukocytes in inflammation. Nature 289: 646-650.

Williams TJ (1979) Prostaglandin E2, prostaglandin 12 and tbe vascular changes of inflam- mation. British Journal of Pharmacology 65: 517-524.

Williams TJ & Morley J (1973) Prostaglandins as potentiators of increased vascular permea- bility in inflammation. Nature 246: 215-217.

Williams TJ & Peck MJ (1977) Role of prostaglandin-mediated vasodilatation in inflammation. Nature 270: 530-532.

Williams TJ, Jose PJ, Wedmore CV, Peck MJ & Forrest MJ (1983) Mechanisms underlying inflammatory oedema: the importance of synergism between prostaglandins, leuko- trienes, and complement-derived peptides. In Samuelsson B, Paoletti R & Ramwell PW (eds) Advances in Prostaglandin, Thromboxane and Leukotriene Research, vol. 11, pp 33-37. New York: Raven Press.