mechanics of 2d materials - unitrento...exercise 4 derive the maximal graphene curvature. for...
TRANSCRIPT
MECHANICS OF 2D
MATERIALS
Nicola Pugno Cambridge
February 23rd, 2015
Outline
⢠Stretching Stress
Strain
Stress-Strain curve
⢠Mechanical Properties Youngâs modulus
Strength
Ultimate strain
Toughness modulus
⢠Size effects on energy dissipated
2
⢠Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM) Stress-intensity factor
Energy release rate
Fracture toughness
Size-effect on fracture strength
⢠Quantized Fracture Mechanics (QFM) Strength of graphene (and related materials)
⢠Bending Flexibility
Bending stiffness
Elastic line equation
Elastic plate equation
3
Exercises by me
1. Apply QFM for deriving the strength of realistic thus defective
graphene (and related 2D materials);
2. Apply LEFM for deriving the peeling force of graphene (and
related 2D materials).
Exercises by you
1. Apply LEFM for measuring the fracture toughness of a sheet
of paper;
2. Apply the Bending theory for calculating the maximal
curvature before fracture.
4
Stretching Fiber under tension
A ð
F
F
âð
2
âð
2
Stress: ð =ð¹
ðŽ
Strain: í =âð
ð
5
Stress-strain curve:
Signature of the material and main tool for deriving its
mechanical properties
Ï
ε
A
C
D B
x
x x
x = failure
If the curve is monotonic, a
force-control is sufficient.
You can derive AB in
displacement control, CD in
crack-opening. The dashed
area is the kinetic energy
released per unit volume
under displacement control.
6
Mechanical properties Ï
ε
x
ðððð¥
íð¢
1
ðž ðž
ð
ðð
ðð 0
â¡ ðž â¡ Youngâs modulus
ðððð¥ = maximum stress â¡ Strength
íð¢ = ultimate strain
ððí =ðž
ð=
ðð¢
0 Energy dissipated per unit volume or Toughness modulus.
ðž = ð¹ðð ð = ðŽð
ðž
ð=
ð¹
ðŽ
ðð
ð= ððí
The toughness modulus is a material
property only for ductile materials.
7
The post-critical behaviour is size-dependent especially for brittle
materials.
Ï
ε
ð 0
â
ð â 0 ductile
ð â â brittle
Size-effects
8
ðž = ðºððŽ
ðºð â¡ fracture energy or energy
dissipated per unit area
ððí â¡ðž
ð=
ðºððŽ
ððŽ=
ðºð
ð
For brittle materials ðž
ð has no meaning: instead of the toughness modulus we
have to use the fracture energy.
Fracture
The reality is in between: energy dissipated on a fractal domain:
ðž
ðâ ð ð·â3 ð = ð
3
D is the fractal exponent, 2 †ð· †3
9
10
Fracture Mechanics
Ï
ðð¡ðð
2a r
ðŸðŒ â¡ Stress intensity factor
ðð¡ðð~ðŸðŒ
2ðð
constant
Elastic solution is singular:
We cannot say
ðð: ðð¡ðð = ðððð¥
ðð stress at fracture
11
Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics
(LEFM) Griffithâs approach
ðº = âðð
ððŽ ð = ðž â ð¿
Energy release
rate Crack surface
area
Total potential
energy
Stored elastic
energy
External work
Crack propagation criterion:
ð® = ð®ðª ðºð â¡ fracture energy
ðº =ðŸðŒ
ðž Elastic solution
ðŸðŒ only for a function of external load and geometry
ð²ð° = ð²ð°ðª ðŸðŒð¶ = ðºð¶ðž Fracture toughness
12
ðŸðŒ values reported in stress-intensity factor Handbooks
E.g., infinite plate (i.e. width â« crack length ~ graphene)
ðŸðŒ = ð ðð
Strength of graphene with a crack of length 2ð
ðŸðŒ = ð ðð = ðŸðŒð¶
ðð =ðŸðŒð¶
ðð
Assuming statistically ð â ð â¡ structural size:
ðð â ð â1
2
Size effect on a fracture strength larger is weaker
problem of the scaling upâŠ.
13
Paradox ðð â â ð â 0
With graphene pioneer Rod Ruoff we invented Quantized Fracture
Mechanics (2004).
The hypothesis of the continuous crack growth is removed: existence of
fracture quanta due to the discrete nature of matter.
14
Related papers:
N. M. Pugno, âDynamic quantized fracture mechanicsâ, Int. J. Fract, 2006
N. M. Pugno, âNew quantized failure criteria: application to nanotubes and
nanowiresâ, Int. J. Fract, 2006
15
Quantized Fracture Mechanics (QFM)
ðºâ = ââð
âðŽ
Quantized energy
release rate
âðŽ = fracture quantum of surface area = ðð¡
Plate
thickness
Fracture
quantum
of length
ð®â = ð®ðª
ðº = âðð
ððŽ âð = â ðºððŽ = â
ðŸðŒ2
ðžððŽ
ðºâ = ââð
âðŽ=
ðŸðŒ
2
ðž ððŽ
âðŽ ðºâ = ðºð
1
âðŽ
ðŸðŒ2
ðžððŽ =
ðŸðŒð¶2
ðž
Quantized stress-intensity factor (generalized): ðŸðŒâ =
1
âðŽ ðŸðŒ
2 ððŽ = ðŸðŒð¶
16
Monolayer graphene and examples
Tennis racket made of
graphene (Head ©)
Youngâs modulus â¡ ðž = 1 TPa
Intrinsic strength ðððð¡ = 130 GPa
Ultimate strain íð¢ = 25 %
C. Lee, X. Wei, J.W. Kysar, J. Hone,
âMeasurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer grapheneâ, Science, 2008 :
Monolayer graphene hanging on a
silicon substrate (scale bar: 50µm) Tensile test on macro samples
of graphene composites
17
Carbon nanotubes
The MWCNTs breaks in the outermost layer
(âsword-in-sheathâ failure),
Youngâs modulus â¡ ðž =250 to 950 GPa
Tensile strength Ï = 11 to 63 GPa
Ultimate strain íð¢ = 12 %
Min-Feng Yu, Oleg Lourie, Mark J. Dyer, Katerina Moloni, Thomas F. Kelly, Rodney S. Ruoff, âStrength and
Breaking Mechanism of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Under Tensile Loadâ, Science, 2000:
Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs)
The singlewalled carbon nanotubes
(SWCNTs) presents:
Youngâs modulus â¡ ðž =1000 GPa
Tensile strength Ï = 300 GPa
Ultimate strain íð¢ = 30 %
18
Exercise 1
E.g., infinite plate
ðŸðŒ = ð ðð
ðŸðŒâ =
1
ðð¡ ð2ððð¡ ðð
ð+ð
ð
= ðð
2ðð + ð 2 â ð2 = ð ð ð +
ð
2
Strength of graphene ðŸðŒâ = ðŸðŒð¶
ðð =ðŸðŒð¶
ð ð +ð2
ð â ðð â
Unstable crack growth
19
ð â 0 Correspondence Principle ðð¹ð â ð¿ðžð¹ð
ð â 0 ðð = ðððððð
ðððððð =ðŸðŒð¶
ðð2
â¹ ð =2
ð
ðŸðŒð¶2
ðððððð2
ð
ðððððð ~ 100 GPa
ðð =ðŸðŒð¶
ð ð +ð2
ðŸðŒð¶ ~ 3MPa m
(QFM 2004)
Very close to predictions
by MD and DFT
Very close to experimental
measurement (2014)
ðððððð ~ ðž
10 ðž~1 TPa
P. Zhang, L. Ma, F. Fan, Z. Zeng, C. Peng, P. E. Loya, Z. Liu, Y. Gong, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, P. M. Ajayan, T.
Zhu & J. Lou, Fracture toughness of graphene, Nature, 2014
20
Exercise 2 Peeling of graphene
ð
ð¿
ð
ð¹
ðž â â ðž â 0
ð¿ = ð â ð cos ð
ðº = âðð
ððŽ=
ðð¿
ððŽ ð¿ = ð¹ð ððŽ = ððð
ðº =ð
ðððð¹ð 1 â cos ð =
ð¹ 1 â cos ð
ð
ðº = ðºð¶ â¹ ð¹ð¶ =ððºð¶
1 â cos ð
ð¹ð¶ strongly dependent on ð
N. M. Pugno, âThe theory of multiple peelingâ, Int. J. Fract, 2011
21
Exercise 3
Apply LEFM for measuring the fracture
toughness of a sheet of paper with a
crack of a certain length in the middle:
22
Bending theory Bending of beams
â
ð
ðð§
ð ð
ððð
ðð§
ðð¥ ðð¥
Bending Moment
ððð
2
ð§ ðŠ
íðð§
2â ðŠ
ððð
2
ðð§ =ðð¥
ðŒð¥ðŠ â ðŸðŠ ðð¥ = ðð§ðŠðððŠ
â2
ââ2
= ðŸðŒð¥
ðð¥ =1
ð ð¥=
ððð¥
ðð§=
íð§
ðŠ=
ðð§
ðžðŠ=
ðð¥
ðŒð¥ðž
ðððð¥ =íð§,ððð¥
â 2
Moment of inertia
ðŒð¥ =ðâ3
12
23
Exercise 4 Derive the maximal graphene curvature.
For graphene â = ð¡ â 0.34 ðð â ðððð¥huge â flexibility is more a structural
than a material property
ðð¥ = âðð£
ðð§ â¹
ð2ð£
ðð§2 = âðð¥
ðŒð¥ðž
ðð§
M M
q T T
N N
ðð
ðð§= âð
ðð
ðð§= ð
â¹ ð4ð£
ðð§4 =ð
ðŒð¥ðž
Elastic line equation
Load per unit length
For plates: ð»4ð =ð
ð·
Elastic plane equation
Load per unit area
Bending stiffness ð· =ðžð¡3
12 1 â ð2