measuring the effectiveness of improvement strategies beyond district improvement plans workshop...

46
Measuring the Effectiveness of Improvement Strategies Beyond District Improvement Plans Workshop Indianapolis – November 14, 2007 Division of Compensatory Education/Title I

Upload: wilfrid-harrell

Post on 28-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Measuring the Effectiveness of Improvement Strategies

Beyond District Improvement Plans WorkshopIndianapolis – November 14, 2007

Division of Compensatory Education/Title I

04/19/23 2

Measuring the Effectiveness of Improvement Strategies

Session Outcomes

1. Participants will understand the critical components of a well-written improvement plan.

2. Participants will be able to write clear, measurable goals focused on identified student learning needs.

3. Participants will be able to identify a variety of evidence useful in determining the effectiveness of improvement actions, including the effectiveness of implementation as well as evidence of progress toward achieving desired results.

04/19/23 3

Measuring the Effectiveness of Improvement Strategies

Key Points

Effective improvement plans have a clear logic that link the plan’s components and guides action.

Effective implementation of planned strategies begins with clear, measurable goals.

The ongoing collection of evidence and data is needed to measure effectiveness of the actions in two areas: fidelity of implementation and impact on student learning.

04/19/23 4

School and District Improvement Plans Serve Multiple Purposes

Improvement Plans

1. Document compliance

2. Guide improvement efforts

04/19/23 5

A logic model depicts the theory of change behind the action.

Goal: 85% of students will be proficient writers at their grade level within three years.

Inputs / Resources

Strategies

Initial Outcomes Intermediate Outcomes

Intended Results

Full-time literacy coaches for each low-performing school and half-time coaches for other schools

Coaches provide professional development and classroom support to teachers in writing process

Teachers learn how to teach writing process

Teachers apply new knowledge and teach writing process in classrooms with support from coaches

65% of fourth grade students will score proficient on state writing assessment

04/19/23 6

Well-planned improvement efforts that follow a clear logic model

can impact student achievement

Research-based reading practices Focused professional development Coaching, support and feedback Formative assessments guiding implementation Establishing a strong reading culture

Scott (2007)

“Reading First” changed reading instruction resulting in student achievement

04/19/23 7

Types of Assessments for Improvement Planning

Planning (needs assessments)

Formative (feedback enroute)

Summative (outcome and impact)

Guskey(2000)

04/19/23 8

Effective Implementation of Strategies Begins with Clear Goals

“Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?” asked Alice.

“That depends a good deal on where you want to get to,” said the cat.

“I don’t much care where,” said Alice.

“Then it doesn’t much matter which way you go,” said the cat.

Lewis CarrollFrom Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland

04/19/23 9

Research Says…

The impact of setting instructional goals on student achievement ranges from 18 to 41 percentile points. (Marzano, 2003)

The power of student engagement in setting and monitoring goals is second only to active participation in impacting student learning. (Wang, Haertel,& Walberg, 1994).

The existence of common goals in schools was…rare and the lack of agreed upon goals makes school unique among organizations. (Schmoker, 1999).

04/19/23 10

Goals are often too broad or vague

to guide effective action.

Section 2: Create Specific, Measurable Goals Purpose: To devise goals that are specific and measurable, and have a high probability of increasing student achievement.

1. Write the findings from Section 1 in the Findings column. 2. Based on the findings, create a goal for each student subgroup, as appropriate. 3. The goal is for two years and should reflect high expectations while being realistic. 4. Incremental goals that demonstrate a move toward all students meeting AYP are acceptable; goals should also consider safe harbor

and confidence intervals. 5. Goals that are “related” to achievement are acceptable (see Finding number 3 below).

Subgroup Not Meeting AYP

Elem. Middle High Findings Goals (as related to findings)

Free and Reduced Lunch

ELA

Math

ELA

Math

ELA

Math

1. The ISTEP+ ELA achievement scores of

students on free and reduced lunch are consistently lower for males than females to a significant degree.

Increase ELA achievement scores of Free and Reduced males in elementary, middle, and high schools. Grade 4 males: from 49 to 59% passing Grade 6 males: from 43 to 53% passing Grade 8 males: from 39 to 49% passing Grade 10 males: from 25 to 35% passing

04/19/23 11

Goals are often too broad or vague to guide effective action.

Section 2: Create Specific, Measurable Goals Purpose: To devise goals that are specific and measurable, and have a high probability of increasing student achievement.

1. Write the findings from Section 1 in the Findings column. 2. Based on the findings, create a goal for each student subgroup, as appropriate. 3. The goal is for two years and should reflect high expectations while being realistic. 4. Incremental goals that demonstrate a move toward all students meeting AYP are acceptable; goals should also consider safe harbor

and confidence intervals. 5. Goals that are “related” to achievement are acceptable (see Finding number 3 below).

Subgroup Not Meeting AYP

Elem. Middle High Findings Goals (as related to findings)

Free and Reduced Lunch

ELA

Math

ELA

Math

ELA

Math

1. Free and reduced lunch scores are much

lower than paid scores in most grade levels.

2. Progress is being made in grades 3 & 5. Paid scores are close to even with F & R scores.

3. Free and reduced lunch scores also contain special education scores so part of the issue is special education students that are also F & R students.

Increase achievement of F & R student subgroup by 10%.

04/19/23 12

SMART Goals: A Critical Step in Improving Student Learning

S Strategic and Specific

M Measurable

A Attainable

R Results-based

T Time-bound

O’Neill & Cozemius (2006)

04/19/23 13

SMART Goals Tree Diagram:Making goals focused and concrete

GOAL INDICATORS MEASURES TARGETS

--O’Neill and Conzemius, The Power of Smart Goals, 2006

04/19/23 14

Goals focus on the “greatest area of need.”

GOAL INDICATORS MEASURES TARGETS

--O’Neill and Conzemius, The Power of Smart Goals, 2006

85% of students will be proficient writers at their grade level within two years.

04/19/23 15

Indicators are the evidence used to determine if the goal is being achieved.

GOAL INDICATORS MEASURES TARGETS

--O’Neill and Conzemius, The Power of Smart Goals, 2006

85% of students will be proficient writers at their grade level within two years.

Organization

Mechanics / Conventions

04/19/23 16

Measures are the assessments usedto gauge progress on the indicators.

GOAL INDICATORS MEASURES TARGETS

--O’Neill and Conzemius, The Power of Smart Goals, 2006

85% of students will be proficient writers at their grade level within two years.

Organization

Mechanics / Conventions

ISTEP

Classroom Assessment

6 + 1 Traits Assessment

ISTEP

04/19/23 17

Targets are the incremental steps toward a longer-range goal.

GOAL INDICATORS MEASURES TARGETS

--O’Neill and Conzemius, The Power of Smart Goals, 2006

85% of students will be proficient writers at their grade level within two years.

Organization

Mechanics / Conventions

ISTEP

Classroom Assessment

6 + 1 Traits Assessment

ISTEP

70% proficient by end of year one

95% will score proficient on writing

rubric

95% will score level 4 (effective) on 4th

grade samples

70% proficient by end of year one

04/19/23 18

Breaking down the component parts helps to focus the goal toward action.

GOAL INDICATORS MEASURES TARGETS

--O’Neill and Conzemius, The Power of Smart Goals, 2006

All teachers will complete the 6+1 Traits Writing Model professional development and implement the model in their classroom

Participation

Classroom Implementation

Workshop Attendance Log

Teacher Writing Instruction Log

Classroom Walkthrough

100% participation

95% completion rate on teacher logs

4 rating on teacher practice

rubric

04/19/23 19

Measurable goals guide thoughtful action

A well-written goal framing a research-based strategy is the foundation for action that can be measured and adjusted as the improvement team implements the plan.

McKeever, Nine Lessons of Successful School Leadership Teams, (2003)

04/19/23 20

Clearly identify what teachers need

to know and be able to do

Sub-group

Elem. Middle High Findings Research Summary

What do teachers need to know and be able to do?

Who will receive this PD?

Black

ELA

Math

ELA

Math

ELA

Math

Black students

writing skills are 15% lower than the scores of their peers.

Student writing

performance is improved by explicit teaching of the elements of the writing process.

1) Teachers learn to evaluate student

writing with accuracy and reliability using the 6+1 Trait Writing Model: Ideas, Organization, Voice, Word Choice, Sentence Fluency, and Conventions, + Presentation

2) Train classroom teachers to use clearly defined scoring Guides

3) Train teachers to use clearly defined scoring Rubrics to examine and assess student papers

4) Train teachers to use a range of teaching strategies to support the Traits Writing Model

Elementary: all teachers and assistants (includes all specialists) Middle: all teachers and assistants High: all teachers and assistants Principals: all

04/19/23 21

Identify measures of effective implementation of new practice

Corresponding Research Base: Student writing performance is improved by explicit teaching of the elements of the writing process.

Dates Presenter and Credentials

Title / Description of Presentation

In Attendance (include grade levels, specialty areas, etc.)

Session Length

Is this ongoing?

How will teachers’ effective implementation of the practice be

measured? 8/2-3/08

9/6/08 10/1/08 1/11/08

Mark Shore, Trainer 6+1 Trait Writing Model

Introduction to 6+1 Trait Writing Model. Teachers will learn to evaluate student writing with accuracy and reliability using the 6+1 Trait Writing Model: Ideas, Organization, Voice, Word Choice, Sentence Fluency, and Conventions, + Presentation.

K–5 teachers

K–5 principals

K–5 teacher assistants

5 hours for each session (initial workshop two 5-hour sessions)

Yes Mark Shore will conduct initial walkthroughs of classrooms with principals, modeling how to gather data using focused recording sheets.

Each principal will conduct focused walkthroughs of each classroom every two weeks and discuss trends and feedback at grade level meetings.

Teachers will maintain a log of when they provided writing instruction and which trait they addressed.

04/19/23 22

Teacher professional development should affect student achievement

Institute for Education Sciences (2007)

1. The professional development activities increase and improve

teachers’ subject matter knowledge.

2. The new knowledge includes and leads to use of instructional

practices, curriculum and assessment that adhere to the research.

Evaluation of changes in

teachers’ practice

conducted.

3. Changes in instruction, curriculum and assessments lead to increased

student achievement, motivation, and interest. .increases

Evaluation of changes in

students’ behavior and learning conducted.

04/19/23 23

An improvement plan that is useful for guiding action…

Follows a logical path Identifies critical student learning needs Has clear, measurable goals Uses research-proven practices Includes measures of changing practice And measures of impact of practice on

student learning

04/19/23 24

Bartholomew Consolidated School Corporation

Columbus, Indiana

Dr. George Van HornDirector of Special Education

04/19/23 25

Disaggregating Student Data

Subgroup not meeting AYP

Questions to better understand this group

Answer to Question

Special ed - Math Elem, Mid, HS Special ed - ELA Elem, Mid, HS

3. Of the additional academic interventions offered to students with disabilities last year which were the most effective (% passing ISTEP+)?

a. Summer Packet only 38% b. Tutoring only 44% c. Summer school only 47% d. Summer school & Packet 46% e. Summer school & Tutoring 48% f. Summer school, Tutoring, & Packet 48%

Section 1b: Disaggregate Student Data Purpose: To determine specific facts or “findings” about the students from the data.

1. Develop a list of questions that need to be answered about the students in the subgroups in order to better understand this group.

2. Determine the data sources that will assist in answering the questions. 3. As a group (include administrators, teachers, and parents), study the data sources and answer

each question. 4. Review the answers, looking for patterns and themes within and across the subgroups. 5. Reword the results as factual findings (perhaps three to four findings). Do not include

possible causes or solutions; simply state “what is.” Write the findings and the data sources on page

04/19/23 26

Creating Specific, Measurable Goals

Specific, measurable goals

4. Ensure use of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles to drive instruction and assessment throughout all classrooms as measured by the documented number of classrooms/teachers using UDL with a target of 25% for 2008-09 and 50% in 2009-2010.

Section 2: Create Specific, Measurable Goals Purpose: To devise goals that are specific and measurable, and have a high probability of increasing student achievement.

1. Write the findings from Section 1 in the Findings column. 2. Based on the findings, create a goal for each student subgroup, as appropriate. 3. The goal is for two years and should reflect high expectations while being realistic. 4. Incremental goals that demonstrate a move toward all students meeting AYP are acceptable;

goals should also consider safe harbor and confidence intervals. 5. Goals that are “related” to achievement are acceptable (see Finding number 3 below).

04/19/23 27

Measuring Effect of Practices on Student Achievement

Specific, measurable goals

How will effectiveness of this practice for increasing student achievement

be measured? 4. Ensure use of Universal Design for

Learning (UDL) principles to drive instruction and assessment throughout all classrooms as measured by the documented number of classrooms /teachers using UDL with a target of 25% for 2008-09 and 50% in 2009-2010.

4a. Teachers self-assessment using new rubric to measure use of UDL.

4b. Principals observations using new rubric to

measure use of UDL. 4c. Student performance on standardized tests,

corporation’s assessments, and classroom assessments.

04/19/23 28

Framework for Evaluating Professional Development

Collect and Analyze Five Levels of Information

1. Participants' reactions2. Participants' learning3. Organization’s support and change4. Participants' use of new knowledge and skills5. Students’ learning outcomes

Guskey (2002)

04/19/23 29

Framework for Evaluating Professional Development

Collect and Analyze of Five Levels of Information

1. Participants' reactions2. Participants' learning3. Organization’s support and change

4. Participants' use of new knowledge and skills

5. Students’ learning outcomes

Guskey (2002)

04/19/23 30

What guideposts will help to assess progress along the way?

“Feedback is

the breakfast of champions.”

Blanchard (2001)

04/19/23 31

Types of Evidence

Classroom observations or WalkthroughsPrincipal – Coach - Peer

Teacher logs or documentation of activity Journals of reflective practice Teacher portfolios Teacher surveys Instructional materials (e.g., lessons, units) Videotapes Pre-post documentation of knowledge (K-W-L)

Of increased teacher knowledge and/or change in classroom practices

04/19/23 32

Types of Evidence

Local assessments District assessments Local rubrics or scoring guides Structured warm up activities Assessments embedded in units of study Talking with students Grades

Of impact of instruction on student learning

04/19/23 33

Types of Evidence

From published formative assessments Measures of Academic Progress (NWEA) Scholastic Reading Inventory (Scholastic) Progress Assessment Series (Pearson) Texas Assessment of Knowledge & Skills (Merit)

Of impact of instruction on student learning

04/19/23 34

Types of Evidence

Of impact of instruction on student learning

Descriptive information Attendance data Discipline referral data Surveys Promotion and graduation data

04/19/23 35

Characteristics of Measures of Effectiveness

Yield reliable information Can be used efficiently Are minimally intrusive Provide feedback that guides action Are aligned with standards Are consistent with larger, summative measures Indicate progress toward a larger goal

04/19/23 36

A well written goal framing a research-based strategy can be measured and adjusted as the plan is implemented.

Subgroup Not Meeting AYP

Elem. Middle High Findings Goals (as related to findings)

Free and Reduced Lunch

ELA

Math

ELA

Math

ELA

Math

1. Free and Reduced Lunch student scores

are much lower than paid scores in most grade levels.

2. Progress is being made in grades 3 & 5. Paid scores are close to even with F & R scores.

3. Free and reduced lunch scores also contain special education scores so part of the issue is special education students that are also F & R students (addressed in separate goal).

Students receiving Free and Reduced Lunch will improve their scores on the writing portion of ISTEP in 2007: Gr. 3: From 55% to 70% Gr. 4: From 52% to 70% Gr. 5: From 66% to 76% Students receiving Free and Reduced Lunch will improve their scores on the writing portion of ISTEP in 2008: Gr. 3: From 70% to 85% Gr. 4: From 70% to 85% Gr. 5: From 76% to 85%

04/19/23 37

Formative assessments allow for monitoring of the strategy’s

impact on student learning.

Timeline Research-based Strategy to Implement

Lead Person Names of Schools and Grade Span to

be Implemented

How will the effectiveness of this practice for increasing student achievement be measured?

2007-08

6 + 1 Writing Traits Model

Mary Simon; Literacy Coaches; Building Principals

All schools grades 1-5

Teachers will use the district writing rubric to score

classroom writing assignments, tracking individual and class progress and aiming for 95% proficient.

Teachers will use 6 + 1 Writing Traits to present

and assess four unit lesson plans from October through March, tracking individual and class progress and aiming for 95% of students scoring at level 4 (effective) or higher.

Teachers will complete the 6 + 1 Traits Model

teacher survey upon completion of the 4th unit lesson and survey results will be analyzed by the staff, along with student results on all writing assessments.

04/19/23 38

The gathered evidence guides the effective implementation

of new instructional skills.

Corresponding Research Base: Student writing performance is improved by explicit teaching of the elements of the writing process.

Dates Presenter and Credentials

Title / Description of Presentation

In Attendance (include grade levels, specialty areas, etc.)

Session Length

Is this ongoing?

How will teachers’ effective implementation of the practice be

measured? 8/2-3/08

9/6/08 10/1/08 1/11/08

Mark Shore, Trainer 6+1 Trait Writing Model

Introduction to 6+1 Trait Writing Model. Teachers will learn to evaluate student writing with accuracy and reliability using the 6+1 Trait Writing Model: Ideas, Organization, Voice, Word Choice, Sentence Fluency, and Conventions, + Presentation.

K–5 teachers

K–5 principals

K–5 teacher assistants

5 hours for each session (initial workshop two 5-hour sessions)

Yes Mark Shore will conduct initial walkthroughs of classrooms with principals, modeling how to gather data using focused recording sheets.

Each principal will conduct focused walkthroughs of each classroom every two weeks and discuss trends and feedback at grade level meetings.

Teachers will maintain a log of when they provided writing instruction and which trait they addressed.

04/19/23 39

Activity: Identifying measures of effectiveness to guide improvement

1. Work with a LEA colleagues or join with another team/person if you are alone.

2. Discuss the sample goal statement and identify two measures of teachers’ effective implementation of the practice and two measures effectiveness of this practice for increasing student achievement.

3. Use the “Characteristics of Measures of Effectiveness” tool to review your work.

04/19/23 40

Identifying Useful Measures of Effectiveness to Guide Improvement Planning

Subgroup Not Meeting AYP

Elem. Middle High Findings Goals (as related to findings)

Free and Reduced Lunch

ELA

Math

ELA

Math

ELA

Math

1. Free and reduced lunch scores are much

lower than paid scores in most grade levels.

2. Progress is being made in grades 3 & 5. Paid scores are close to even with F & R scores.

Raise the math performance of Free and Reduced Lunch students on the 2007 ISTEP: Gr. 3: Raise from 64% to 75% Gr. 4: Raise from 65% to 75% Gr. 5: Maintain at 79%

Timeline Research-based Strategy

to Implement Lead Person Names of Schools

and Grade Span to be Implemented

How will the effectiveness of this practice for increasing student achievement be measured?

Dates Presenter and

Credentials Title / Description

of Presentation In Attendance

(include grade levels, specialty areas, etc.)

Session Length

Is this ongoing?

How will teachers’ effective implementation of the practice be measured?

04/19/23 41

Characteristics of Measures of Effectiveness

Yield reliable information Can be used efficiently Are minimally intrusive Provide feedback that guides action Are aligned with standards Are consistent with larger, summative measures Indicate progress toward a larger goal

04/19/23 42

Measuring the Effectiveness of Improvement Strategies

Useful improvement plans have clear logic that drives the plan’s components and guides the actions.

Effective implementation of planned strategies begins with clear, measurable goals.

A well written goal framing a research based strategy can be measured and adjusted.

Measures of effectiveness evaluate the degree of implementation with fidelity and the impact on student learning.

04/19/23 43

Break-out Session

A set-aside time to review and revise district improvement plans and apply knowledge gained here.

Available assistance from Great Lakes East Comprehensive Center:

Stacy Rush – Students with disabilities Maria Derrick-Mescua – Students learning English Doug Walker Jayne Sowers

Assistance with measuring effectiveness

within district improvement plans

04/19/23 44

References

Blanchard, K. & Johnson, S. (2001). The one minute manager. London: HarperCollins.

Guskey, T. R., (1999). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Guskey, T. R. (2002) Does it make a difference? Evaluating

professional development. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 45–51.

Institute for Education Sciences, (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved 11/7/07 from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/southwest/pdf/REL_2007033.pdf

04/19/23 45

References, continued

McKeever, B. (2003). Nine lessons of successful school leadership teams. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.

Marzano, R. J. (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction.

Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.

O’Neill, J. & Cozemius, A. (1999) The power of SMART goals: Using goals to improve student learning. Bloomington, IN.

Schmoker, M. (1999). Results: The key to continuous school improvement (2nd ed). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Scott, C. (2007). Reading First: Locally appreciated, nationally troubled.

Washington, DC. Center on Education Policy. Retrieved 11/6/07 from http://www.cep-dc.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=document.showDocumentByID&nodeID=1&DocumentID=228

04/19/23 46

References, continued

Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63(3), 249–294.