me3-cbbsg-slides
TRANSCRIPT
Mood Influences in Daily Life
Mood impacts how we perceive, experience, and remember what we encounter in the world.
Our moods shape many cognitive processes and therefore are influential in even common activities
Research and theory demonstrate that, broadly speaking, positive and negative mood lead to differences in attention and information processing
Global vs. Local Processing Positive and negative mood lead to differences in attention and processing (Abele & Petzold, 1994; Gasper & Clore, 2002)
Positive mood fosters global processing while negative mood fosters local processing.
Affect-as-informationPositive mood indicates that the current environment is
safe (Schwarz, 1990).
• Promotes use of heuristic strategies (Armitage et al., 1999)
• Utilizes accessible knowledge (Bless et al., 1996)
Negative mood indicates that the current environment is problematic.
• Triggers careful stimulus processing (Schwarz & Bless, 1991)
• Focuses on incoming information and external cues (Bless et al., 1996; Koch & Forgas, 2012)
Influences in Processes & Strategies This deviation in attention and subsequent stimulus
processing leads to individuals in positive and negative moods utilizing different processing strategies in tasks.
And so effectively fosters differences in behavior and performance for different tasks (Fiedler & Beier, 2014)
Effects of Positive MoodIncreases flexible representations (Huntsinger, Clore &
Bar-Anan, 2010)
Promotes knowledge-based organization (Bless et al., 1992)
Increases text-based and constructive inferences (Bohn-Gettler & Rapp, 2012)
Benefits performance on creative problem-solving (Hertel et al., 2000)
Effects of Negative Mood Increases careful responding and avoidance of errors
(Koch & Forgas, 2012)
Promotes item-specific processing and memory recall and recognition (Forgas et al., 2009)
Promotes use of causal explanations (Bohner et al., 1988)
Leads to better analytical reasoning (Barthe & Funke, 2010)
Benefits systematic problem-solving (Spering et al., 2005)
Mood & Reading ComprehensionResearch and theory on mood influences illustrate costs
and benefits in methodical or creative tasks
do not apply so straightforwardly to other activities
Reading comprehension requires both stimulus processing and knowledge integration
So let’s talk about reading…
Aims
Past research has focused on word lists, sentences, or fictional narratives (Bower, 1981; Ellis, Thomas, & Rodriguez, 1984; Egidi & Gerrig, 2009)
Exception is Bohn-Gettler & Rapp (2011) on differences in processes during reading and comprehension
Aim to expand the investigation of reading comprehension
Bohn-Gettler & Rapp, 2011Examined mood influences on text processing and
comprehension
Induced neutral, positive, and negative mood on 110 participants
Read one of four texts adapted from Scientific American
• Engaged in a think-aloud task as they read each sentence
• Completed a 3-min distractor task
Summarized the text
Bohn-Gettler & Rapp, 2011Results indicate:
• Both moods led to increased paraphrasing
• Positive mood increased text-based inferences
• Both moods remembered more important points of the text compared to neutral
No differences were found between positive and negative mood in text comprehension, only in reading processes
Questions: Isn’t that Strange? Reasons to think there would also be different outcomes
of subsequent text comprehension
• abundant theory on mood influences of stimulus processing and information-processing strategies
• deviation between moods in reading processes
Target nuances of positive and negative mood effects on text comprehension
• expand the text comprehension assessment
Questions: Mood Congruency?Mood congruency: an alignment between the mood of the
reader and emotional valence of a stimulus
• found to benefit various tasks of text comprehension: word, sentence, or narrative text materials (Bower, Monteiro, & Gilligan, 1978; Havas, Glenberg, & Rinck, 2007)
• Egidi & Gerrig (2009) found readers expect the content of a text to be aligned with their current mood and express surprise at incongruent narrative endings
Examined mood congruency on text comprehension
Questions: Hypotheses?Do the differences in processing styles invoked by mood
affect learning and text comprehension?
• Positive and negative mood will show differences in text comprehension
Does mood congruency of the reader and the text moderate the influence of mood on comprehension?
• Mood congruency of the reader and the text will promote comprehension
Participants N = 160 (51% female; 49% male)
completed study through Amazon Mechanical Turk
compensated $1.50 for completing the 20-25 minute study
Conditions2 x 2 between-subjects design
Randomly assigned to mood and text conditions
• Mood Induction – positive or negative
• Text – positive or negative
Mood Induction Video induction (Rottenberg, Ray, & Gross, 2007)
Each participant watched an approximately 2.5 minute long video
Texts Participants read a text adapted from a lecture on
animal adaptations
explains the concepts of adaptation, genetic variation, and sexual reproduction
uses an example of how a polar bear’s traits help it survive in the North Pole
Summary by Paragraphs
1. Polar bears can live in the North Pole because of adaptations
2. Body fat, wide paws, and white fur to survive the North Pole
3. Genetic variation, due to sexual reproduction or genetic mutation, can lead to different characteristics
4. Variations can increase an organism’s chances of survival in a particular environment
5. Changes in the environment can mean animals without adaptations would not survive.
Positive/Negative Text
Positive/negative versions were written while retaining content
Positive/negative words from database of emotion norms for nearly 14,000 English words (Warriner, Kuperman, & Brysbaert, 2013)
• included ratings of emotional valence invoked by each word
• over 700 raters
Sentences that could not be rewritten without changing the content were left neutral.
Example sentencesNegative: Our polar bear resides in the bleak, miserable
North Pole, which means that it has to suffer the freezing temperatures.
Positive: Our polar bear lives in the North Pole, which means that it heartily faces the challenges of the wintry weather and finding food in the environment.
Neutral (in both texts): How can animals that are related to each other be different?
Text Length: both versions of the text were 58 sentences.
Difficulty: assessed by Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) (Klare, 1974)
• Negative FKGL = 9.3
• Positive FKGL = 9.1
Positive/Negative content: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) category scores (Pennebaker, Booth, & Francis (2007)
Negative Positive
positive emotion 0.57 4.12
negative emotion 4.12 0.11
Test Questions & Error TypesMultiple choice questions created using Graesser &
Person (1994) question-asking taxonomy
• 14 surface questions: 7 in pre-test and 7 in post-test counterbalanced
• 6 inference questions in post-test
Four answer choices (Ozuru et al., 2007):
• Correct answer
• Near miss error
• Thematic miss error
• Distractor error
Error TypesNear miss errors overlap conceptually with the correct
answer
• technically correct, but not the best answer
Thematic miss errors are plausible, but demonstrate a misconception or actually refer to a different but related point
• Accurate, but not correct answers
Distractor errors are inconsistent altogether
Surface Question Example Text: Also, the polar bear is white, so it can blend in with
his snowy environment. This allows it to sneak up on its food prey when it hunts!
Question: According to the text, what are polar bears able to do because of their white color?
• Correct answer: sneak up on prey
• Near miss: hide from predators
• Thematic miss: reflect light
• Distractor: blend in with the ice and snow
Inference Question ExampleText: These variations among individuals in a species
usually have no effect on the individual or its survival... But sometimes, these variations can negatively impact the individuals survival!
Question: Genetic mutations occurred in a population of field mice so that some mice have red fur bright enough to be easily spotted, some mice can run very fast, and some mice are unchanged. Which mice would you expect to reproduce?
• Correct answer: the mice that run very fast and the mice that are unchanged
• Near miss: only the mice that run very fast
• Thematic miss: all are equally likely to reproduce
• Distractor: There is not enough information to predict chances of survival
ProcedureCompleted pre-test
Watched positive/negative video and self-reported affect
Read positive/negative text and self-reported affect
• Self-paced, presented one sentence at a time
• advanced by pressing the space bar
Completed post-test
If watched negative video, ended with positive video
Manipulation check
used ratings of pleasantness in a univariate ANOVA by video condition
Scale: 1-9
• Very unpleasant – very pleasant
N = 79 N = 81
Negative Positive0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
4.46
6.98
Pleasantness*
examined valence after watching the videos to verify the effectiveness of the mood induction
Arousal
same analyses with ratings of arousal
Scale 1 – 9
• Sleepy – active
Arousal included as covariate for post-test analyses Negative Positive
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
6.647.04
Arousal
determine if mood had unintentional effect on arousal (Bohn-Gettler & Rapp, 2012)
N = 79 N = 81
Confounds: overall reading time
N = 45 N = 66 N = 52 N = 59
Neg Video Pos Video0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
3.51 3.66
RT By Video
Neg Text Pos Text0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
3.453.73
RT by Text
2x2 ANOVA of total reading time in minutes by video and by text
Confounds: Prior Knowledge
Neg Video Pos Video0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.240.26
Prior Knowledge By Video
Neg Text Pos Text0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.25 0.24
Prior Knowledge by Text
N = 79 N = 81 N = 78 N = 82
2x2 ANOVA of pre-test performance by video and by text
Post-test Analyses2x2 ANOVAs by video and by text on proportions of:
• Post-test surface and inference-level questions
• Near miss, thematic miss, and distractor proportions
Covariates: pre-test performance (prior knowledge) and arousal
Found no main effects of text or interaction effects of video x text
Post-test Performance
N = 79 for Neg Video; N = 81 for Pos Video
Surface Inference Combined0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
0.43
0.56
0.49
0.42
0.490.45
Neg Video
Pos Video
Error Analyses
N = 79 for Neg Video; N = 81 for Pos Video
NearMiss ThematicMiss Distractor Combined0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
0.38
0.20
0.42
0.51
0.33
0.25
0.42
0.55
Neg Video
Pos Video
ConclusionsDifferences in performance on inference questions
because answer choices involved picking the best answer to the question.
• required understanding content and using detailed knowledge to discern correct answer, near miss, and thematic miss
Negative mood paid more attention to text-specific details
• Performance bolstered by careful stimulus processing
Positive mood integrated knowledge with big ideas
• Made more thematic miss errors
ContributionsIn conjunction with Bohn-Gettler & Rapp (2011), our study
demonstrates that mood clearly influences the processes and products of text comprehension
Whether mood effects will impact comprehension activity depends on the level of detail required
• Both moods promote memory of important details (Bohn-Gettler & Rapp, 2011)
• No difference in surface-level questions
Negative mood can be beneficial when required to understand main ideas and select best answer
ImplicationsNegative mood can perform better on tasks that require
understanding ideas and attention to detail
While mood clearly influences reading comprehension, different tasks, texts, and circumstances play a role in determining whether positive or negative mood may be more beneficial
Future work can identify those situations and investigate similar effects on texts on different subjects