mcelroy, haynes, & franjoine 2009. m r franjoine & m p haynes dimensionfunctional...

52
cElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Upload: mariah-hodge

Post on 02-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009 M R Franjoine & M P Haynes

Dimension Functional Domain Disability Domain

A. Body structure & functions

Structural & functional integrity

Impairments

A.Primary

B.Secondary

B. Motor functions Effective posture & movement

Ineffective posture & movement

C. Individual functions

Functional activities Functional activity limitations

D. Social functions Participation Participation restriction

+ Domains -

From: NDT Approach Theoretical Foundations & Principles of Clinical Practice, Table 2.1 pg. 82

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Be transient and disappearPreterm infantsMedically fragile children

Continue as Hypotonic CP

Later be diagnosed as Athetoid, Ataxic, or Spastic CP

May:

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Be part of an obvious or later diagnosed genetic syndrome

Down SyndromePrader-WilliJoubert Syndrome

Other syndromesFetal alcohol syndrome (FAS)Fragile X syndromeMaternal drug abuse

May:

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

A muscle fiber type disorder

Sensory integration disorder

MR

Autism

May be:

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

CognitionNeuromuscular SystemSensory SystemMusculoskeletal SystemRegulatoryGastrointestinalCardiopulmonaryIntegumentary

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Variable:Child to childEtiology

Cognition often underestimatedFlat affectAppears “slow” or “lazy”Latency of response time

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Abnormally low muscle resting tone

Abnormally low resistance to being lengthened

Feels “soft” when handledDescribed as “floppy”

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Impaired Muscle Synergies

Impaired Muscle Activation

Inability to Initiate, Sustain, Terminate

Insufficient Co-activation

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Holding joint positions in midrange is difficultMove quickly through transitions

Tend to work at end rangesDecrease degrees of freedom distallyHyperextention of elbows and knees

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Difficulty initiating muscle contractionThreshold for fiber firingInsufficient number of fibers recruitedSlow to respondResponse is then short-lived“Good baby”…later “lazy”May have a flat affectIn supine “look flat”

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Difficulty in sustained holding against gravity…especially postural muscles

Look like gravity is pulling them downHave a “belly” when upright

Often turns muscles off to quicklyi.e. Collapse when standing

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

• Impaired Motor Execution

Impaired Modulation and Scaling of Forces

Impaired Timing and Sequencing

Excessive overflow of Intra-Interlimb contractions

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Phasic bursts of movement

Little grading – moves quickly to end ranges

Overshoots target or strikes target inappropriately

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Primary—Difficulty grading agonists and antagonists

Timing and sequencing difficulties may be secondary to initiate, sustain, and strength issues

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Impaired Force Generation

Strength: the ability to contract a muscle to a sufficient degree to impact the task

Primaryinability to reach threshold for muscle firinginability to recruit enough muscle fibers

SecondaryLittle muscle holding: decreased strength/atrophyChanges in muscle fiber type 2°to phasic use

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Anticipatory Postural Control—Probably not a primary impairment

Difficult with latency of initiation

Often they may anticipate a movement and “lock out their joints” in anticipation

Anticipation may be present…just not appropriate

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Poverty of Movement

“Poverty”--they don’t move muchHappy to stay in one place

Movement repertoires are somewhat limited

Secondary to strength, alignment, and stability available to them during developmentMovements in the frontal and, especially, the transverse planes are less frequently seen

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Fractionated or Dissociated Movements

Often use pure reciprocal innervation rather than co-contraction

Movements may be “too dissociated”Need to control degrees of freedom to support purposeful isolated controlOften fix distally

Splaying of fingersPlantar-flexion of ankles

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Vision

Vestibular

Somatosensory

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Primary ImpairmentsRefractory errorsVisual field lossStrabismusCortical visual impairment not as common as in SQ

Secondary ImpairmentUses eyes for postural stabilization

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Difficulty using: proprioceptive informationtactile information

Primary impairmentIf inappropriate firing of receptors

Secondary impairmentIf caused by lack of experience due to little movement, ability to read the input didn’t develop well

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

“ the ability of the nervous system to perceive, interpret, modulate, and organize sensory input for use in generating or adapting motor responses… (Miller & Lane 2000)

Degree of difficulty varies widely by etiology of the hypotonia

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Bones:Changes are usually secondary to static positons

PlagiocephalyFlattend ribcageKyphosisShoulder instabilityHip instability

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Muscles:AtrophyWeaknessFiber type changesMuscle shorteningMuscle overlengthening

Connective tissue:

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Muscles:AtrophyWeaknessFiber type changesMuscle shorteningMuscle overlengthening

Primary or Secondary Impairments?

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Connective Tissue:Hyperextensible jointsLigamentous laxity

Primary or Secondary Impairments?

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009 M R Franjoine & M P Haynes

Dimension Functional Domain Disability Domain

A. Body structure & functions

Structural & functional integrity

Impairments

A.Primary

B.Secondary

B. Motor functions Effective posture & movement

Ineffective posture & movement

C. Individual functions

Functional activities Functional activity limitations

D. Social functions Participation Participation restriction

+ Domains -

From: NDT Approach Theoretical Foundations & Principles of Clinical Practice, Table 2.1 pg. 82

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Antigravity postures are difficult so use phasic bursts of movement

Move quickly to ends of range

Rest on ligaments, joint capsules, and bones

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Use wide BOS in both UEs and LEs

Move quickly to ends of range

Rest on ligaments, joint capsules, and bones

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Postures:Hyperextends neck and “rests” head backMouth is often openShoulder complex is often elevated to support headLower extremities are widely abducted and externally rotated

Movement:Even neck extension is phasic…head may fall forward without controlNo lateral weight shifts!!!!

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Postures:Prefers arms abducted and legs abductedBody “melted” onto the floor

Movement:Antigravity of extremities difficultSometimes “walks” extremities with hand movementsCan’t lift head against gravity“Flings” extremities

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Postures:Retains flexed spinal position with hyperextended head resting positionSometimes looks like their chest “folds” in frontUses UEs for support (hyperextended elbows)

May use feet as handsPosteriorly tilted pelvisBOS is very wide, knees flexed or extended

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Movement:Keeps the COM in the middle of the BOS

Will pivot rather than rotate spine

Often transitions out of sitting in the sagittal plane with legs abducted

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Postures:Hyperextension at the neck and elbowsUEs abductedHips and knees flexed greater than 90°Hips abducted

Movement:Moves extremities rapidly with longer periods of 4s support with extremities “locked” when possibleMuch rather scoot on bottom!!!

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Postures:Support with UEsHips are abductedHips rest on feet or floor

Movement:Difficult position to maintainWill not transition to ½ kneel, pushes with legs at the same time to get to standing

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Postures:Still like hyperextended neck and kyphotic upper spineUEs used to increase stiffness of trunkPelvis may be anteriorly or posteriorly tiltedWide BOS in LEs Knees hyperextended, out-toeing

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Movement:Legs may “fold” unexpectedlyDifficulty shifting weight laterally to unweight one leg for gaitWide BOS and short steps make gait awkward and inefficient

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009 M R Franjoine & M P Haynes

Dimension Functional Domain Disability Domain

A. Body structure & functions

Structural & functional integrity

Impairments

A.Primary

B.Secondary

B. Motor functions Effective posture & movement

Ineffective posture & movement

C. Individual functions

Functional activities Functional activity limitations

D. Social functions Participation Participation restriction

+ Domains -

From: NDT Approach Theoretical Foundations & Principles of Clinical Practice, Table 2.1 pg. 82

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

LOCOMOTOR SKILLS

• Independent, efficient upright mobility difficult• Coordination and safety is a concern

COMMUNICATION • Though may be difficult to understand, communication is usually verbal

BASIC ADL’S • Usually can master ADLs• May be more limited by cognition than motor ability

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009 M R Franjoine & M P Haynes

Dimension Functional Domain Disability Domain

A. Body structure & functions

Structural & functional integrity

Impairments

A.Primary

B.Secondary

B. Motor functions Effective posture & movement

Ineffective posture & movement

C. Individual functions

Functional activities Functional activity limitations

D. Social functions Participation Participation restriction

+ Domains -

From: NDT Approach Theoretical Foundations & Principles of Clinical Practice, Table 2.1 pg. 82

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Accepted by family…”good child” or “lazy child”

Often not accepted by peers due to latency of responses and communicationsSometimes problems safely accessing playgrounds and community centers

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Work upright whenever possible

Attend closely to alignment

Narrow the base of supportEmphasize weight shifts

May need to increase attention and/or arousal

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

Increase proprioception by activating co-contraction around joints…holding and graded movements

Build strength working in midranges… concentric and eccentric

McElroy, Haynes, & Franjoine 2009

“Good” babies and children are often ignored

The static situation of these children interferes with exploration and learning

Don’t under-estimate the power of the biomechanical limits these children face.