may 17, 20002 platform design considerations jim choate intel corporation

23

Upload: dwain-tucker

Post on 23-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation
Page 2: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation

May 17, 2000 2

Platform Design ConsiderationsPlatform Design Considerations

Jim ChoateJim Choate

Intel CorporationIntel Corporation

Page 3: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation

May 17, 2000 3

AgendaAgenda

GuidelinesGuidelines Measurement TechniquesMeasurement Techniques Early Testing ResultsEarly Testing Results SummarySummary

Page 4: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation

May 17, 2000 4

GuidelinesGuidelines

USB 2.0 guidelines will be more systematic, USB 2.0 guidelines will be more systematic, detailed than 1.x whitepapersdetailed than 1.x whitepapers

Proposed guideline areas:Proposed guideline areas:– Attenuation, jitter budgetsAttenuation, jitter budgets– Package/board/chassis designPackage/board/chassis design– EMI/EMC EMI/EMC – Use of test modes and testing for complianceUse of test modes and testing for compliance

Page 5: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation

May 17, 2000 5

Board DesignBoard Design

4 layer sufficient; trace impedance4 layer sufficient; trace impedancematching is keymatching is key

3 ns + 26 ns + 1 ns3 ns + 26 ns + 1 ns Avoid long runsAvoid long runs Do not cross plane splitsDo not cross plane splits Minimize viasMinimize vias Maximize distance to other tracesMaximize distance to other traces

Motherboard Is theToughest Environment

Motherboard Is theToughest Environment

Page 6: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation

May 17, 2000 6

Board Design GuidelinesBoard Design Guidelines

Board Stack-up:Board Stack-up:– 4 layer, impedance controlled boards required4 layer, impedance controlled boards required– Impedance targets must be specifiedImpedance targets must be specified– Ask your board vendor what they can achieveAsk your board vendor what they can achieve

Classic four-layer stackClassic four-layer stackSignal 1Signal 1

PrepregPrepreg

VCCVCCCoreCoreGroundGround

PrepregPrepreg

Signal 2Signal 2

Example target impedance:Example target impedance:0.005 in trace at 60+/-15%0.005 in trace at 60+/-15%7.5mil traces with 7.5mil7.5mil traces with 7.5milspacing Zdiffspacing Zdiff 90 90

Page 7: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation

May 17, 2000 7

Routing GuidelinesRouting Guidelines

Control trace widths to obtain target impedanceControl trace widths to obtain target impedance– Ask your board vendor what they can achieveAsk your board vendor what they can achieve– As always, cost is a considerationAs always, cost is a consideration

Maintain strict trace spacing controlMaintain strict trace spacing control Minimize stubsMinimize stubs

D-D-D-D-

D+D+D+D+

15k15k

15k15kCorrect way to connect to resistorsCorrect way to connect to resistors

Page 8: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation

May 17, 2000 8

Routing GuidelinesRouting Guidelines

Routing over plane splitsRouting over plane splits Creating stubs with test pointsCreating stubs with test points Violating trace spacing guidelinesViolating trace spacing guidelines

Common Routing MistakesCommon Routing Mistakes

Ground or power planeGround or power plane

tptpDon’t cross plane splitsDon’t cross plane splits

Proper routing technique Proper routing technique maintains spacing guidelinesmaintains spacing guidelines

Page 9: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation

May 17, 2000 9

Measurement TechniquesMeasurement Techniques

Selecting appropriate test equipmentSelecting appropriate test equipment– Accurate measurement of signal quality requires an Accurate measurement of signal quality requires an

oscope and probes with adequate BW and sample rateoscope and probes with adequate BW and sample rate

– Proper test fixtures are also importantProper test fixtures are also important

Equipment that will workEquipment that will workScope: TDS 694C - 10GS/s, 3GhzScope: TDS 694C - 10GS/s, 3GhzProbe: P6247 Fet Probe - 4Ghz, .4pF typProbe: P6247 Fet Probe - 4Ghz, .4pF typ

9090

Differential ProbeDifferential Probe

Page 10: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation

May 17, 2000 10

Board TestingBoard Testing

Use TDRs to verify adherence to budgetUse TDRs to verify adherence to budget– Typical TDR measurementTypical TDR measurement

Refer to section 7.1.6.2 of the specification for detailsRefer to section 7.1.6.2 of the specification for details

0.00E+00 2.00E-09 4.00E-09 6.00E-09 8.00E-09 1.00E-08 1.20E-08

time

imp

ed

an

ce

Connector Connector ReferenceReference

TimeTime

Page 11: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation

May 17, 2000 11

EMIEMI

USB1.X EMI solutions don’t work for USB2USB1.X EMI solutions don’t work for USB2– Low pass filters damage signal qualityLow pass filters damage signal quality

D+

D -

Vcc

USB AConnector

Typical USB 1.1 Termination SchemeTypical USB 1.1 Termination Scheme

Page 12: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation

May 17, 2000 12

EMIEMI

Proper grounding of chassis is crucialProper grounding of chassis is crucial– Connector shell must connect to green wireConnector shell must connect to green wire

ground early and wellground early and well– IO shield must connect securely to chassisIO shield must connect securely to chassis

and receptacleand receptacle 2 wire common mode choke is preferred2 wire common mode choke is preferred

– Blocks common mode EMI from leaving chassisBlocks common mode EMI from leaving chassis– Differential signal rolloff frequency should be highDifferential signal rolloff frequency should be high

Page 13: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation

May 17, 2000 13

ESD, EMCESD, EMC

ESD strikes spread out in time by inductanceESD strikes spread out in time by inductanceof cables and hubs in seriesof cables and hubs in series– Bypass/flyback caps on Vbus near connector helpBypass/flyback caps on Vbus near connector help

Hardware ProtectionHardware Protection– Well-grounded shield Well-grounded shield – 4 wire common mode choke4 wire common mode choke– Spark gap arrestorsSpark gap arrestors– Shielded cablesShielded cables

Page 14: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation

May 17, 2000 14

DP1DP1

DM1DM1

1.5 1.55 1.6 1.65 1.7 1.75 1.8 1.85 1.9

x 10-5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

s

V

keyboard glitchkeyboard glitchkeyboard glitchkeyboard glitch

ESD, EMCESD, EMC

Differential squelch/disconnectDifferential squelch/disconnect Pattern matching before connectivityPattern matching before connectivity Sampling over extended times e.g. ChirpSampling over extended times e.g. Chirp

Noise Immunity Built IntoLow-Level Protocol

Noise Immunity Built IntoLow-Level Protocol

Page 15: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation

May 17, 2000 15

Early Testing ResultsEarly Testing ResultsUSB2 Validation Motherboard USB2 Validation Motherboard

Fron

t Pan

elFr

ont P

anel

Test ChipBack PanelBack Panel

Test ChipTest Chip

Page 16: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation

May 17, 2000 16

Routing Paths Tested Routing Paths Tested

USB ConnectorUSB Connector

Motherboard

PCI S

LOT

PCI S

LOT

LANLAN

PCI S

LOT

PCI S

LOT

PCI S

LOT

PCI S

LOT

PCI S

LOT

PCI S

LOT

South Bridge

NEC test chip

Long RouteLong Route

Front Panel HeaderFront Panel Header

Early Testing ResultsEarly Testing Results

Motherboard

PC

I S

LOT

LAN

PC

I S

LOT

PC

I S

LOT

PC

I S

LOT

South Bridge

USB ConnectorUSB Connector

Short RouteShort Route

NEC test chip

Page 17: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation

May 17, 2000 17

TP2 TP3

Early Testing ResultsEarly Testing Results

Back panel eye pattern resultsBack panel eye pattern results– EMI/ESD componentsEMI/ESD components– Both at A-connector (TP2) and at end of USB cable (TP3)Both at A-connector (TP2) and at end of USB cable (TP3)– Three-stack connector on MBThree-stack connector on MB

Page 18: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation

May 17, 2000 18

MotherboardMotherboard Front PanelDaughter Card

Front PanelDaughter Card

Board DesignBoard Design

Daughtercard at front/side panelDaughtercard at front/side panel– Bypass caps, EMI control components, strain reliefBypass caps, EMI control components, strain relief

Header and cableHeader and cable– Keyed header, cable of limited length andKeyed header, cable of limited length and

matched impedance matched impedance

Front/Side Panel ConnectorsFront/Side Panel Connectors

Page 19: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation

May 17, 2000 19

18” Shielded, twisted pair

18” ribbon cable

Early Testing ResultsEarly Testing Results

Front Panel Header Cable Options TestedFront Panel Header Cable Options Tested

Page 20: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation

May 17, 2000 20Shielded Front Panel CableShielded Front Panel Cable Ribbon Front Panel CableRibbon Front Panel Cable

Early Testing ResultsEarly Testing Results

Front-panel cable implementation eye pattern resultsFront-panel cable implementation eye pattern results– 18 inch, twisted pair, shielded front panel cable18 inch, twisted pair, shielded front panel cable– 18 inch unshielded front panel “ribbon” cable18 inch unshielded front panel “ribbon” cable

Page 21: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation

May 17, 2000 21

Early Testing ResultsEarly Testing Results

Front-panel cable implementation eye pattern resultsFront-panel cable implementation eye pattern results– 18 inch, twisted pair, shielded front panel cable18 inch, twisted pair, shielded front panel cable– 18 inch unshielded front panel “ribbon” cable18 inch unshielded front panel “ribbon” cable

80

72

Con

nect

or re

fere

nce 110

1.4 nsexception window

Shielded, Twisted PairShielded, Twisted PairFront Panel CableFront Panel Cable

114

145

114

RibbonRibbonFront Panel CableFront Panel Cable

Con

nect

or re

fere

nce

Page 22: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation

May 17, 2000 22

SummarySummary

USB 2.0 design presents new challengesUSB 2.0 design presents new challenges– Board layoutBoard layout– Common mode chokesCommon mode chokes– Chassis groundingChassis grounding– Signal Quality MeasurementSignal Quality Measurement– Compliance TestingCompliance Testing

USBIF will be providing design guidesUSBIF will be providing design guidesin such areasin such areas

Page 23: May 17, 20002 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation