maven pfp mechanical peer review sep (solar energetic particles) instrument may 10, 2010 david...

54
MAVEN PFP Mechanical Peer Review SEP (Solar Energetic Particles) Instrument May 10, 2010 David Glaser Davin Larson Robert Lillis Paul Turin David Curtis

Upload: william-mcbride

Post on 26-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

MAVEN PFP Mechanical Peer ReviewSEP (Solar Energetic Particles) Instrument

May 10, 2010

David GlaserDavin LarsonRobert LillisPaul Turin

David Curtis

2PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

Overview

• Background: THEMIS SST– Flight Heritage– Mechanical Design

• Proposed Design Changes for MAVEN SEP

– Science Driven– Improved Assembly– Spacecraft Driven

3PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

Background: THEMIS SST

SEP will be much the same as the Solid State Telescope (SST) on THEMIS

4PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

Background: THEMIS SST

Flight Heritage• 10 SSTs were flown on THEMIS – 2 on each Spacecraft• Mechanical design has performed well on all instruments• Solid Models, drawings, and assembly procedures are

well documented• Most of SST design team is present

Design Team• Davin Larson – Lead Scientist• Robert Lee – Lead Mechanical Engineer (no longer at

SSL)• Paul Turin – Supporting Senior Mechanical Engineer• Craig Tindall (LBL) – Detector Design/Fabrication

5PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

SST Mechanical Design

• SST Sensor Unit– DFE (Detector Front End) Subassembly– Magnet-Yoke Subassembly– Attenuator-Actuator Subassembly– Collimators– Support Structure– Bi-Directional FOV

• Attenuator Actuation– Linear Actuators– Position Switches

• Attenuator Control• Thermal Shield• Sensor Orientation on Spacecraft

6PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

Sensor Unit Schematic

• The Solar Energetic Particle (SEP) instrument measures the energy spectrum and angular distribution of solar energetic electrons (30keV–1 MeV) and ions (30 keV-12 MeV).

FoilCollimator

Thick Detector

Sm-Co Magnet (sweeps away electrons <350 keV)

Attenuator

Al/Polyamide/Al Foil(stops ions <350 keV?)

Open Detector

Attenuator

Open Collimator

Foil Detector

IonsElectrons

7PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

Sensor Cross Section

Attenuator

Foil

Magnet

Detector Stack

Attenuator

Foil Collimator

Open Collimator

8PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

Typical Electrical Connection Between Detector and Flex-Circuit

SST Mechanical Design

Kapton Flex-Circuit

Detector (pixelated side)

Wirebond Loop

(NOT to scale – actual loop height < 300 micron)

9NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009

Detectors (4)

Spring Clamp

Spring Plate (2)

Detector Board Composition (exploded view)

PEEK Spacer (4)

BeCu Gasket (3)

Kapton Flex-Circuit (4) AMPTEK Shield

KaptonHeater

Thermostat

DFE Board Subassembly

SST Mechanical Design

10NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009

DFE Board Subassembly Relative Positions

(2 per sensor)

AMPTEK Shielding

Detector Stack Subassembly

Multi-Layer Circuit Board (62 mil thickness)

Foil Frame

Thermostat

SST Mechanical Design

11NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009

Magnet-Yoke AssemblyCo-Fe Yoke (2)

Sm-Co Magnet (4) (currently not visible)

Aluminum Magnet Cage

SST Mechanical Design

12NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009

Attenuator Assembly

Attenuator (4)

Cam (2)

SMA Lever (2)

SST Mechanical Design

13NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009

Actuators and Position Switches

Honeywell SPDT Hermetically Sealed Switch (2)

SMA Actuator (2)

SST Mechanical Design

14NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009

Two Collimators Per Side

Electron SideIon Side

SST Mechanical Design

15NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009

Four Collimators Per Sensor

Ion Side

Electron Side

Electron SideIon Side

SST Mechanical Design

16NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009

Support Structure

(back section)

Electrical Connector

Bottom Closeout Panel

Rigid Mounting Flange

SST Mechanical Design

17NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009

Support Structure

(front section)

Kinematic Flexure (2)

Rigid Mounting Flange

SST Mechanical Design

18NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009

Bi-Directional Fields-of-View

SST Mechanical Design

19NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009

• Sensor Unit Mounting Using Kinematic Flexures– Each sensor mounted to spacecraft panel at

three points• One rigid mounting flange• Two mounting flanges with kinematic flexures

– Allows relative motion due to CTE differences between sensor structure and spacecraft panel• Predicted expansion differential along instrument

axes with 120 ºC temperature gradient:– X-Axis: 0.006” (0.15 mm)– Y-Axis: 0.013” (0.33 mm)

– Flexure dimensions sized to keep maximum bending stresses below 6061-T6 yield strength• Factor of Safety (F.S.) > 1.4 per NASA-STD-5001

SST Mechanical Design

20NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009

Attenuator Actuation – CLOSED position

Honeywell Switch (extended-position)

SMA Actuator (extended)

Honeywell Switch (compressed-position)

SMA Actuator (retracted)

SST Mechanical Design

21NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009

Attenuator Actuation – OPEN position

Honeywell Switch (compressed-position)

SMA Actuator (retracted)

Honeywell Switch (extended-position)

SMA Actuator (extended)

SST Mechanical Design

22NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009

• Attenuator Control – CLOSED to OPEN (INITIAL)

CLOSEAttenuator

OPEN Attenuator

PCB

+5V

SEP Sensor

+5V

GNDGND

MonitorMonitor

PCB

SPDT Switch

FREE COMPRESSED

C C

NC NC

NONO

FRONT SMA(ACTIVE)

BACK SMA

HIGHLOW

SST Mechanical Design

23NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009

• Attenuator Control – OPEN to CLOSED (INITIAL)

PCB

+5V

SEP Sensor

+5V

GNDGND

MonitorMonitor

PCB

SPDT Switch

CLOSEAttenuato

r

OPEN Attenuator

COMPRESSED FREE

C C

NC NC

NONO

FRONT SMABACK SMA(ACTIVE)

LOWHIGH

SST Mechanical Design

24NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009

SST Mechanical Design

Thermal Shielding Box was added after CDR

Silver Teflon Tape

25NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009

SEP Mechanical Design

•Sensor Orientation Relative to Spacecraft Bus

26PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

MAVEN SEP

SEP – Solar Electric Particle Instrument•Largely identical in mechanical design to SST with a few small changes•Flight heritage will allow rapid development of engineering and flight instrument models

27PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

MAVEN SEP

Mechanical Design Team•Davin Larson – Lead Scientist•Robert Lillis – Research Scientist•David Glaser – Mechanical Design•Paul Turin – PFP Mechanical Lead•Craig Tindall (LBL) – Detector Design/Fabrication

28PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

MAVEN SEP

Mechanical Work to Date•Weekly meetings since February 2010•Compiled a list of desired improvements•Preliminary Designs of Improvements made in SolidWorks•Drivers of Design Changes

•Improve science capability•Improve ease of assembly•Spacecraft Driven

29PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

SEP Design Changes from SST

1. Increase Detector Area in Y dimension2. Increase Collimator FOV in Y dimension3. Add relief in magnet cages to reduce unwanted reflections4. Move detector foils closer to detectors5. Change foil thickness from 4.3µm to 2µm (?)6. Eliminate electron side attenuator (?)7. Blacken the attenuator paddle8. Reverse attenuator pinhole angle (?)9. Change Detector Stack Holder from PEEK to brass10. Change soldered detector connections to spring loaded buttons11. Change from one 26-pin connector to two 21-pin connectors12. Change Attenuator Winchester Connectors from 4-pin to 2-pin13. Removal of heater and thermostat from Amptek Amplifiers14. Survival Heaters added to housing exterior15. Minor changes to thermal protection box (reflect changes in allowable

instrument footprint)16. Change Purge System

Science

Assembly

Spacecraft

30PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

MAVEN SEP

Science Driven Changes

How can the science data be increased/improved without inducing any major design changes to the instrument?

1. Increase the FOV2.Try to reduce scattered light reaching the

detector

31PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

1. Increase Detector Size in Y Direction

7 mm 8.2 mm

Design Changes from SST

SST Active Detector Area: 92.4 mm2

SST Active Detector Area: 108.2 mm2

17% Larger

13.2 mm

32PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

2. Increase Collimator FOV in Y Direction

Design Changes from SST

SST 40° x 23° SEP 40° x 31°

33PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

2. Increase Collimator FOV in Y Dimension

Design Changes from SST

SST FOVs were6° and 23°, are now11° and 31°

Baffles and Collimator Apertures Enlarged in Y Dimension

34PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

2. Increase Collimator FOV in Y Direction

Design Changes from SST

Path to Detector At Sun Angles Less Than

Direct 15.5°

1 Bounce – Magnet Cage ~25°

1 Bounce – Outer Baffle Edge

15°

Sunlight Reaching the DetectorNominal Sun Angle is 45° from instrument axis

35PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

3. Add Relief in Magnet Cages – to Reduce Reflections

Inner Surface of Magnet Cage Can Reflect to Detector

Design Changes from SST

36PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

Design Changes from SST

Surfaces Relieved By .010 inches (Material Thickness Changed from .030” to .020”)

3. Add Relief in Magnet Cages – to Reduce Reflections

37PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

4. Move Foils Closer to Detectors – To lose fewer electrons to scattering

Original Distance: 0.29 inches (7.4 mm)

Design Changes from SST

Foil

Detector

38PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

4. Move Foils Closer to Detectors

Design Changes from SST

39PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

4. Move Foils Closer to Detectors

New Distance: 0.07 inches (~1.8 mm)

Design Changes from SST

Foil (5. Change thickness of foil (?))

Detector Detector Stack Holder

(9. Changed from PEEK to Brass)

New location: beneath stack holder

Issue: Detector Vents are covered up by foil frame

40PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

6. Eliminate Electron Side Attenuators (?)-Predicted electron fluxes indicate attenuator may not be necessary

Design Changes from SST

41PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

7. Blacken Attenuator Paddles 8. Reverse Angle of Attenuator Aperture (?)

Design Changes from SST

Current SolidWorks ModelIncoming particles can

reflect from sides of aperture

Aperture reversed – less opportunity for reflection

from sides

42PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

MAVEN SEP

Instrument Assembly Driven Changes

43PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

10. Improve Upon Soldered Detector Connections

Original Design - Contacts were soldered together

Design Changes from SST

Kapton Flex Circuits

BeCuSpacers

44PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

New Design – Contacts via Spring Buttons

Design Changes from SST

Gold Plated Brass Button Contacts Flex Circuit Above

Gold Plated StainlessSpring – Squared End Contacts Pad on Board

OD .080”

Spring Deflection: 0.025”Spring Force: 0.58 lbContact Stress: ~1000 psi

10. Improve Upon Soldered Detector Connections

45PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

Design Changes from SST

Flex Circuits Pressed Down on Spring Buttons by an Aluminum Clamp

10. Improve Upon Soldered Detector Connections

Flex Circuit Tabs Shortened

Pads on Flex Circuits Enlarged

46PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

11. Change from one 26-pin connector to two 21-pin connectors (one for each DFE Board)

Design Changes from SST

SST SEP

47PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

12. Change Attenuator Winchester Connectors from 4-Pin to 2-Pin- extra pin was used for a monitor, smaller connector occupies less space

Design Changes from SST

11. Change from one 26-pin connector to two 21-pin connectors (one for each DFE Board)

48PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

11. Change from one 26-pin connector to two 21-pin connectors

Design Changes from SST

Each connector is mounted to its DFE board

Glenair Micro-D 21-pin Right AnglePCB Mount Connector

Nut Plate (2-56 tapped holes)

49PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

MAVEN SEP

Changes Driven by MAVEN Spacecraft

50PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

Design Changes from SST

13. Remove Heater and Thermostat from Amptek Boxes- Because of spacecraft harnessing and also reduces noise

Kapton Heater

Thermostat

SST DFE Board

51PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

14. Add Survival Heaters to Housing Exterior

Design Changes from SST

Two 1-2 W heaters (Location TBD)

52PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

15. Minor Changes to Thermal Shield Assembly

Design Changes from SST

SST SEP

Bevel was necessary on THEMIS due to space constraints on instrument platform

53PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

16. Change Purge System

Design Changes from SST

•THEMIS SST had remove-before-flight N2 purge hardware•MAVEN SEP will require a hard plumbed system on the instrument•Redesign not done yet

THEMIS SSTN2 Purge System

54PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010

Summary/Conclusion

• THEMIS SST provides successful heritage to SEP

• Only minor modifications are necessary

• Need to be careful to follow most recent SST design and procedures when documentation is not clear