maven pfp mechanical peer review sep (solar energetic particles) instrument may 10, 2010 david...
TRANSCRIPT
MAVEN PFP Mechanical Peer ReviewSEP (Solar Energetic Particles) Instrument
May 10, 2010
David GlaserDavin LarsonRobert LillisPaul Turin
David Curtis
2PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
Overview
• Background: THEMIS SST– Flight Heritage– Mechanical Design
• Proposed Design Changes for MAVEN SEP
– Science Driven– Improved Assembly– Spacecraft Driven
3PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
Background: THEMIS SST
SEP will be much the same as the Solid State Telescope (SST) on THEMIS
4PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
Background: THEMIS SST
Flight Heritage• 10 SSTs were flown on THEMIS – 2 on each Spacecraft• Mechanical design has performed well on all instruments• Solid Models, drawings, and assembly procedures are
well documented• Most of SST design team is present
Design Team• Davin Larson – Lead Scientist• Robert Lee – Lead Mechanical Engineer (no longer at
SSL)• Paul Turin – Supporting Senior Mechanical Engineer• Craig Tindall (LBL) – Detector Design/Fabrication
5PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
SST Mechanical Design
• SST Sensor Unit– DFE (Detector Front End) Subassembly– Magnet-Yoke Subassembly– Attenuator-Actuator Subassembly– Collimators– Support Structure– Bi-Directional FOV
• Attenuator Actuation– Linear Actuators– Position Switches
• Attenuator Control• Thermal Shield• Sensor Orientation on Spacecraft
6PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
Sensor Unit Schematic
• The Solar Energetic Particle (SEP) instrument measures the energy spectrum and angular distribution of solar energetic electrons (30keV–1 MeV) and ions (30 keV-12 MeV).
FoilCollimator
Thick Detector
Sm-Co Magnet (sweeps away electrons <350 keV)
Attenuator
Al/Polyamide/Al Foil(stops ions <350 keV?)
Open Detector
Attenuator
Open Collimator
Foil Detector
IonsElectrons
7PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
Sensor Cross Section
Attenuator
Foil
Magnet
Detector Stack
Attenuator
Foil Collimator
Open Collimator
8PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
Typical Electrical Connection Between Detector and Flex-Circuit
SST Mechanical Design
Kapton Flex-Circuit
Detector (pixelated side)
Wirebond Loop
(NOT to scale – actual loop height < 300 micron)
9NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009
Detectors (4)
Spring Clamp
Spring Plate (2)
Detector Board Composition (exploded view)
PEEK Spacer (4)
BeCu Gasket (3)
Kapton Flex-Circuit (4) AMPTEK Shield
KaptonHeater
Thermostat
DFE Board Subassembly
SST Mechanical Design
10NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009
DFE Board Subassembly Relative Positions
(2 per sensor)
AMPTEK Shielding
Detector Stack Subassembly
Multi-Layer Circuit Board (62 mil thickness)
Foil Frame
Thermostat
SST Mechanical Design
11NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009
Magnet-Yoke AssemblyCo-Fe Yoke (2)
Sm-Co Magnet (4) (currently not visible)
Aluminum Magnet Cage
SST Mechanical Design
12NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009
Attenuator Assembly
Attenuator (4)
Cam (2)
SMA Lever (2)
SST Mechanical Design
13NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009
Actuators and Position Switches
Honeywell SPDT Hermetically Sealed Switch (2)
SMA Actuator (2)
SST Mechanical Design
15NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009
Four Collimators Per Sensor
Ion Side
Electron Side
Electron SideIon Side
SST Mechanical Design
16NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009
Support Structure
(back section)
Electrical Connector
Bottom Closeout Panel
Rigid Mounting Flange
SST Mechanical Design
17NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009
Support Structure
(front section)
Kinematic Flexure (2)
Rigid Mounting Flange
SST Mechanical Design
19NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009
• Sensor Unit Mounting Using Kinematic Flexures– Each sensor mounted to spacecraft panel at
three points• One rigid mounting flange• Two mounting flanges with kinematic flexures
– Allows relative motion due to CTE differences between sensor structure and spacecraft panel• Predicted expansion differential along instrument
axes with 120 ºC temperature gradient:– X-Axis: 0.006” (0.15 mm)– Y-Axis: 0.013” (0.33 mm)
– Flexure dimensions sized to keep maximum bending stresses below 6061-T6 yield strength• Factor of Safety (F.S.) > 1.4 per NASA-STD-5001
SST Mechanical Design
20NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009
Attenuator Actuation – CLOSED position
Honeywell Switch (extended-position)
SMA Actuator (extended)
Honeywell Switch (compressed-position)
SMA Actuator (retracted)
SST Mechanical Design
21NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009
Attenuator Actuation – OPEN position
Honeywell Switch (compressed-position)
SMA Actuator (retracted)
Honeywell Switch (extended-position)
SMA Actuator (extended)
SST Mechanical Design
22NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009
• Attenuator Control – CLOSED to OPEN (INITIAL)
CLOSEAttenuator
OPEN Attenuator
PCB
+5V
SEP Sensor
+5V
GNDGND
MonitorMonitor
PCB
SPDT Switch
FREE COMPRESSED
C C
NC NC
NONO
FRONT SMA(ACTIVE)
BACK SMA
HIGHLOW
SST Mechanical Design
23NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009
• Attenuator Control – OPEN to CLOSED (INITIAL)
PCB
+5V
SEP Sensor
+5V
GNDGND
MonitorMonitor
PCB
SPDT Switch
CLOSEAttenuato
r
OPEN Attenuator
COMPRESSED FREE
C C
NC NC
NONO
FRONT SMABACK SMA(ACTIVE)
LOWHIGH
SST Mechanical Design
24NGIMS MSR, 10/19/2009
SST Mechanical Design
Thermal Shielding Box was added after CDR
Silver Teflon Tape
26PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
MAVEN SEP
SEP – Solar Electric Particle Instrument•Largely identical in mechanical design to SST with a few small changes•Flight heritage will allow rapid development of engineering and flight instrument models
27PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
MAVEN SEP
Mechanical Design Team•Davin Larson – Lead Scientist•Robert Lillis – Research Scientist•David Glaser – Mechanical Design•Paul Turin – PFP Mechanical Lead•Craig Tindall (LBL) – Detector Design/Fabrication
28PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
MAVEN SEP
Mechanical Work to Date•Weekly meetings since February 2010•Compiled a list of desired improvements•Preliminary Designs of Improvements made in SolidWorks•Drivers of Design Changes
•Improve science capability•Improve ease of assembly•Spacecraft Driven
29PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
SEP Design Changes from SST
1. Increase Detector Area in Y dimension2. Increase Collimator FOV in Y dimension3. Add relief in magnet cages to reduce unwanted reflections4. Move detector foils closer to detectors5. Change foil thickness from 4.3µm to 2µm (?)6. Eliminate electron side attenuator (?)7. Blacken the attenuator paddle8. Reverse attenuator pinhole angle (?)9. Change Detector Stack Holder from PEEK to brass10. Change soldered detector connections to spring loaded buttons11. Change from one 26-pin connector to two 21-pin connectors12. Change Attenuator Winchester Connectors from 4-pin to 2-pin13. Removal of heater and thermostat from Amptek Amplifiers14. Survival Heaters added to housing exterior15. Minor changes to thermal protection box (reflect changes in allowable
instrument footprint)16. Change Purge System
Science
Assembly
Spacecraft
30PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
MAVEN SEP
Science Driven Changes
How can the science data be increased/improved without inducing any major design changes to the instrument?
1. Increase the FOV2.Try to reduce scattered light reaching the
detector
31PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
1. Increase Detector Size in Y Direction
7 mm 8.2 mm
Design Changes from SST
SST Active Detector Area: 92.4 mm2
SST Active Detector Area: 108.2 mm2
17% Larger
13.2 mm
32PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
2. Increase Collimator FOV in Y Direction
Design Changes from SST
SST 40° x 23° SEP 40° x 31°
33PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
2. Increase Collimator FOV in Y Dimension
Design Changes from SST
SST FOVs were6° and 23°, are now11° and 31°
Baffles and Collimator Apertures Enlarged in Y Dimension
34PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
2. Increase Collimator FOV in Y Direction
Design Changes from SST
Path to Detector At Sun Angles Less Than
Direct 15.5°
1 Bounce – Magnet Cage ~25°
1 Bounce – Outer Baffle Edge
15°
Sunlight Reaching the DetectorNominal Sun Angle is 45° from instrument axis
35PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
3. Add Relief in Magnet Cages – to Reduce Reflections
Inner Surface of Magnet Cage Can Reflect to Detector
Design Changes from SST
36PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
Design Changes from SST
Surfaces Relieved By .010 inches (Material Thickness Changed from .030” to .020”)
3. Add Relief in Magnet Cages – to Reduce Reflections
37PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
4. Move Foils Closer to Detectors – To lose fewer electrons to scattering
Original Distance: 0.29 inches (7.4 mm)
Design Changes from SST
Foil
Detector
38PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
4. Move Foils Closer to Detectors
Design Changes from SST
39PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
4. Move Foils Closer to Detectors
New Distance: 0.07 inches (~1.8 mm)
Design Changes from SST
Foil (5. Change thickness of foil (?))
Detector Detector Stack Holder
(9. Changed from PEEK to Brass)
New location: beneath stack holder
Issue: Detector Vents are covered up by foil frame
40PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
6. Eliminate Electron Side Attenuators (?)-Predicted electron fluxes indicate attenuator may not be necessary
Design Changes from SST
41PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
7. Blacken Attenuator Paddles 8. Reverse Angle of Attenuator Aperture (?)
Design Changes from SST
Current SolidWorks ModelIncoming particles can
reflect from sides of aperture
Aperture reversed – less opportunity for reflection
from sides
43PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
10. Improve Upon Soldered Detector Connections
Original Design - Contacts were soldered together
Design Changes from SST
Kapton Flex Circuits
BeCuSpacers
44PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
New Design – Contacts via Spring Buttons
Design Changes from SST
Gold Plated Brass Button Contacts Flex Circuit Above
Gold Plated StainlessSpring – Squared End Contacts Pad on Board
OD .080”
Spring Deflection: 0.025”Spring Force: 0.58 lbContact Stress: ~1000 psi
10. Improve Upon Soldered Detector Connections
45PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
Design Changes from SST
Flex Circuits Pressed Down on Spring Buttons by an Aluminum Clamp
10. Improve Upon Soldered Detector Connections
Flex Circuit Tabs Shortened
Pads on Flex Circuits Enlarged
46PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
11. Change from one 26-pin connector to two 21-pin connectors (one for each DFE Board)
Design Changes from SST
SST SEP
47PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
12. Change Attenuator Winchester Connectors from 4-Pin to 2-Pin- extra pin was used for a monitor, smaller connector occupies less space
Design Changes from SST
11. Change from one 26-pin connector to two 21-pin connectors (one for each DFE Board)
48PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
11. Change from one 26-pin connector to two 21-pin connectors
Design Changes from SST
Each connector is mounted to its DFE board
Glenair Micro-D 21-pin Right AnglePCB Mount Connector
Nut Plate (2-56 tapped holes)
50PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
Design Changes from SST
13. Remove Heater and Thermostat from Amptek Boxes- Because of spacecraft harnessing and also reduces noise
Kapton Heater
Thermostat
SST DFE Board
51PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
14. Add Survival Heaters to Housing Exterior
Design Changes from SST
Two 1-2 W heaters (Location TBD)
52PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
15. Minor Changes to Thermal Shield Assembly
Design Changes from SST
SST SEP
Bevel was necessary on THEMIS due to space constraints on instrument platform
53PFP Mechanical Peer Review – May 10, 2010
16. Change Purge System
Design Changes from SST
•THEMIS SST had remove-before-flight N2 purge hardware•MAVEN SEP will require a hard plumbed system on the instrument•Redesign not done yet
THEMIS SSTN2 Purge System