Partnership for AiR Transportation Noise and Emission Reduction Partnership for AiR Transportation Noise and Emission Reduction

An FAA/NASA/TC-sponsored Center of Excellence

Matthew Woody and Saravanan Arunachalam

Institute for the Environment, UNC Chapel Hill

October 19-21, 20098th Annual CMAS User’s Conference, Chapel Hill, NC

Secondary Organic Aerosol Produced Secondary Organic Aerosol Produced from Aircraft Emissions at the Atlanta from Aircraft Emissions at the Atlanta

Airport – An Advanced Diagnostic Airport – An Advanced Diagnostic Investigation Using Process AnalysisInvestigation Using Process Analysis

2

Overall Motivation for FAA Research

• Aviation activities have emissions of CO, NOx, VOC, SOx, PM2.5 and numerous hazardous air pollutants– Critical to understand exposure to these to protect public health

• Compared to all other sources that impact air quality, aviation emissions are usually small– For e.g. in the U.S., NOx from aviation contributes < 1% in 77% of

counties, PM2.5 contributes < 1% in 94% of counties– However, in some counties, airport contribution could be significant

• Concerns about potential growth of aviation emissions in the future

• Aviation emissions vary in 4-D (in space and time), undergo complex chemical transformation in the atmosphere– Need to be characterized accurately for better understanding their

atmospheric impacts

3

Background

Emissions at ATL airport

• CMAQ modeling performed to determine effects of aircraft emissions on air quality at 3 airports– Atlanta Hartsfield (ATL), Chicago O’Hare (ORD) and Providence

T.F. Green (PVD) airports

• MM5-SMOKE-CMAQ (v4.6) modeling system used along with the FAA Emissions Dispersion and Modeling System (EDMS)– Emissions from Landing-

TakeOff cycle (LTO) up to 10,000 ft

– Aircraft emissions processed through SMOKE using EDMS2INV interface (Baek et al, 2007)

4

Background • CMAQ Modeling Scenarios

– base02 (NEI-2002 based emissions for non-aviation sources)– sens_airc (above plus aircraft emissions from ATL, ORD, and

PVD)

• June and July modeled at 36k, 12k, and 4k resolutions

• Contributions from aircraft computed from the difference of sens_airc (with aircraft emissions) minus base02 (without)

• Model performance evaluated using AMET for PM2.5 data from various networks (Arunachalam et al, 2008)

Modeling Domains

5

Monthly Average Change in PM2.5 due to Aircraft Emissions at ATL

0.50%

1.47%

5.66%

0.51%

1.18%

5.61%

Overall, aircraft emissions increase PM2.5 concentrations at the grid- cell containing the airport.

However, aircraft emissions reduce SOA concentrations at 36k and 12k grid resolutions while SOA concentrations increase at

the 4k resolution.

6

Overall Goals

• Determine the chemical and physical processes behind the changing concentrations of SOA at the various grid resolutions– SOA reduced at 36k and 12k, increase at 4k– Focus on grid-cell containing airport

• Test modeling updates in CMAQ v4.7 (aero5) with new SOA pathways and precursors, and determine the impacts of changes in SOA concentrations due to aircraft emissions, relative to CMAQ v4.6 (aero4)

7

Process Analysis Approach

• Chose the 2 days from June and July which exhibited the largest reduction of SOA concentrations in the 12k and 36k grid resolutions– June 6 and 7, 2002

• Two days rerun in CMAQ v4.6 with Process Analysis– Integrated Process Rates– Integrated Reaction Rates

04-km grid-cell

12-km grid-cell

36-km grid-cell

JST

• Compare results at 3 resolutions (36k, 12k, and 4k) for the single grid-cell containing the airport and for the 9 grid-cells (at 12k resolution) and 81 grid-cells (at 4k resolution) that match the spatial extents of the 36k grid-cell

8

Changes in SOA Concentrations Due to Aircraft at ATL

36k 4k12k

SOA changes due to aircraft are driven by aerosol process.Since aircraft emissions do not contain SOA precursors, what is happening

to free radical budgets that oxidize SOA precursors?

9

Changes in NO3 Concentrations Due to Aircraft at ATL

36k 4k12k

Aircraft emissions cause reductions in NO3, hindering oxidation of SOA precursors. Vertical diffusion drives the changes in NO3.

10

Changes in NO3 Concentrations Due to Aircraft at ATL – Layers 1 through 14

36k 4k12k

ONONO

ONNONO

2NONONO

ONOONO

2hv-

3

522-3

2-3

2-332

Reductions of NO3 concentrations from aircraft in lower 14 lowers driven by chemistry. NOx emissions from aircraft react to reduce NO3 concentrations

(not shown)

11

Changes in Primary Organic Aerosol Concentrations Due to Aircraft at ATL

36k 4k12k

Increase in Primary Organic Aerosol (POA) from direct aircraft emissions at the 4k resolution provide additional surface area for SOA to partition onto.

12

Changes in POA Emissions Due to Aircraft at ATL

Concentration (μg/m3) Based Emissions

Mass Per Time (g/s) Based Emissions

Emissions are equivalent on a mass basis but are diluted over larger grid cells at coarse resolution.

13

Changes in SOA Concentrations – Analysis for Equivalent Areas

36k, 12k, and 4k resolutionsEquivalent Areas at 36k, 12k

(3x3), and 4k (9x9) resolutions

Equivalent spatial extents at 3 grid resolutions exhibit similar patterns – gas phase chemistry dominates change in SOA concentrations due to aircraft

SOA

14

Changes in SOA Concentrations Due to Aircraft at ATL – v4.6 vs. v4.7

36k 12k

4k

Solid lines indicate v4.6Dotted lines indicate v4.7

Change in SOA concentrations follow similar diurnal patterns in v4.6 and v4.7, but with differing magnitudes

15

Changes in NO3 and POA Concentrations Due to Aircraft at ATL – v4.6 vs. v4.7

Solid lines = v4.6 Dotted lines = v4.7

No change in NO3 or POA from v4.6 to v4.7 (expected)

NO3

POA

36k 4k12k

16

Comparison of Total Carbon Against Jefferson Street (JST) SEARCH Monitor

36k 12k

4k

CMAQ v4.7 performs better at the 4k resolution while performance at 36k and 12k resolutions remains relatively unchanged

17

Conclusions

• Used Process Analyses to explain CMAQ sensitivity to aircraft emissions at different grid resolutions– SOA changes due to aircraft emissions are dependent on grid resolution, and

the relative magnitude of POA and radical budgets

• At 36k and 12k, SOA concentrations are reduced at the grid-cell containing the airport due to gas phase chemistry– NOx emissions react with NO3, preventing NO3 from oxidizing SOA

precursors

• At the 4k grid resolution, SOA concentrations increase due to POA emissions from aircraft at the airport– POA provides additional surface area for SOA to partition onto

• Changes in SOA concentrations exhibit similar diurnal patterns in CMAQ v4.6 and v4.7– Smaller magnitude of changes in SOA concentrations due to aircraft in v4.7

• Comparison against Total Carbon at JST indicates v4.7 performs better at 4k resolution than 4.6 while performance remains relatively unchanged at 36k and 12k resolutions

18

Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of

the FAA, NASA or Transport Canada.

This work was funded by FAA and Transport Canada under FAA Award Nos.:

07-C-NE-UNC, Amendment Nos. 001, 002, 003 and 004

The Investigation of Aviation Emissions Air Quality Impacts project is managed by Christopher Sequeira.

Acknowledgements

• CSSI, Inc. for EDMS outputs• Jim Boylan, GA DNR for providing ATL 4k input datasets• Barron Henderson, for assistance with PERM