matthew for the 21 st century
DESCRIPTION
Matthew for the 21 st Century. An applied Hermeneutics of Resonance For the Lectionary Year B, 2014. Hermeneutics of Resonance. Fidon Mwombeki Trust Analogy “A view from somewhere” - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Matthew for the 21 st Century](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062814/56816722550346895ddba995/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Matthew for the 21st Century
![Page 2: Matthew for the 21 st Century](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062814/56816722550346895ddba995/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
An applied
Hermeneutics of Resonance
For the Lectionary Year B, 2014
![Page 3: Matthew for the 21 st Century](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062814/56816722550346895ddba995/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Fidon Mwombeki Trust Analogy “A view from somewhere” The hermeneutic, contrary to some
contemporary views, supposes that an ancient text can still speak to a modern world.
Hermeneutics of Resonance
![Page 4: Matthew for the 21 st Century](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062814/56816722550346895ddba995/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Textual-canonical Theological Ecclesial Socio-cultural
Particularly we focus on the move from socio-cultural resonance to theological and ecclesial
Hermeneutics of Resonance
![Page 5: Matthew for the 21 st Century](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062814/56816722550346895ddba995/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Our society disguises its values as “common
sense” Sociologists call this a “hegemony”- an
engineered consensus The gospel calls us to examine the values on
which our society is based. We look critically at the “common sense”
hegemony.
The 21st Century Context
![Page 6: Matthew for the 21 st Century](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062814/56816722550346895ddba995/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Since Marx, “common sense” has been
dominated by economics. This applies to both left and right. Alisdair MacIntyre on the effects of
utilitarianism:the values that modernity imbibes are those of profit,
power and status. These have become the goods of effectiveness replacing
goods of excellence. (summary)
Common Sense Today 1
![Page 7: Matthew for the 21 st Century](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062814/56816722550346895ddba995/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
A market economy An “economy of scarcity” The promotion of competition The fear of loss.
How does this shape our behaviour? As Individuals?
As a society?
Common Sense Today 2
![Page 8: Matthew for the 21 st Century](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062814/56816722550346895ddba995/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Who thinks this? David Hume:“If nature supplied abundantly all our wants and desires…the jealousy of interest, which justice
supposes, could no longer have a place”Treatise of Human Nature, III.2
Common Sense Today 3
![Page 9: Matthew for the 21 st Century](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062814/56816722550346895ddba995/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Nicholas Rescher:“An economy of scarcity is, by definition, one in which justice (in a restricted sense of the term) cannot be done because there is not enough to go around: if everyone is given a share proportional to his claims and desert then someone- or everyone- is pressed beneath the floor of the minimally acceptable level.”Public Concerns: Philosophical Studies of Social Issues, 123
Common Sense Today 4
![Page 10: Matthew for the 21 st Century](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062814/56816722550346895ddba995/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
An Honour/Shame Society Cultural anthropology and ancient rhetoric but like ours one living in tension between
goods of excellence and goods of effectiveness
Ancient Common Sense
![Page 11: Matthew for the 21 st Century](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062814/56816722550346895ddba995/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
1. Honour is the pivotal social value2. Seeking honour for the family was the primary task of males3. Honour was limited in supply: to gain honour meant someone else lost it.4. A loss of honour demanded retaliation of some form. The society was thus agonistic and competitive in nature.5. Status and honour were revealed in the ways in which participants were treated in social settings such as meals.
Ancient Common Sense
![Page 12: Matthew for the 21 st Century](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062814/56816722550346895ddba995/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Desirable attributes in a spouse include: Rank ( citizenship, social rank) Wealth Character Looks Health
Are these goods of excellence or external goods? How might our values compare?
Ancient Common Sense
![Page 13: Matthew for the 21 st Century](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062814/56816722550346895ddba995/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
The contexts align: limited good/scarcity Inverting or rejecting “common sense”? Putting a stress on goods of excellence
through the rejection of goods of effectiveness
Matthew’s Jesus in Contexts
![Page 14: Matthew for the 21 st Century](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062814/56816722550346895ddba995/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The Kingdom of God
“The Bible gives us a perfectly consistent pattern. God has absolute sway in heaven. He should have absolute sway also on earth” (O’Neill 1993, 131)
This geographical or territorial aspect is echoed in the OT imagery used of the kingdom which is frequently described as a town or a city.
And we also need to note a rabbinic convention that the Kingdom stands for a “coming kingdom” which is taken on by the believe, meaning,
“acknowledging the effective sovereignty of God, an acknowledgment made by someone living in the world, but expecting the coming of the kingdom” (O’Neill 1993, 133).
With this background in mind, we can note a common schema in the NT: “(I) the Kingdom is like a delectable house or city or territory which people
long to be able to enter when it comes; (II) people can talk about the kingdom; and (III) people can prepare to enter the Kingdom by taking its yoke upon themselves now.”(O’Neill 1993, 134)
Jesus’ “Goods of Excellence”
![Page 15: Matthew for the 21 st Century](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062814/56816722550346895ddba995/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Dikaiosune- righteousness Not based on human conventions (how often
are popular views of justice reflections of the lex talionis)
Righteousness to be based on God’s character and action
Available for everyone Based on a paradigm of forgiveness and love See how this expands to include all: the
inclusivist biblical tradition, but not universalism
Jesus’ “Goods of Excellence”
![Page 16: Matthew for the 21 st Century](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062814/56816722550346895ddba995/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The gospel often stresses the difficulty of
attaining goods of excellence. This can make Matthew look very legalistic
and depressing. An alternative view: the impossibility of DIY
demands a different approach: reliance on God
Means of Acquisition
![Page 17: Matthew for the 21 st Century](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062814/56816722550346895ddba995/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Many readings are parables. Greek parabole Hebrew mashal The dynamic of the story may be more
important than the details ( allegorical reading)
Consider how parables are comments on the lfe and ministry of Jesus.
Parables
![Page 18: Matthew for the 21 st Century](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062814/56816722550346895ddba995/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Suggestions for further
Reading