mathematics, science and technology mst education in get & … · (dinaledi schools) lolt -...
TRANSCRIPT
National Strategy for Mathematics, Science and Technology
MST Education in GET & FET (2019-2030)
6 August 2018Premier Hotel, OR Tambo
STEM Education Discussion Forum led by proSET of the NSTF, in collaboration with Ukuqonda Institute
Presentation Outline1. Background of the National Strategy on MST
Education in GET and FET
2. National Development Plan Goals (2011)
3. MST Ministerial Task Team Recommendations(2013)
4. Revised National Strategy for Mathematics,Science and Technology Education in GET & FET(June 2001)
5. MST Education Strategy Implementation Plan– Participation and Performance Targets
– High Impact Activities & Interventions
– Mathematics Framework
– Short, Medium and Long Term Plans
Background
of the National Strategy on
MST Education in
GET and FET
Revised National Strategy for
Mathematics, Science and Technology
Education in GET & FET
(2001)(Dinaledi Schools)
MST Integrated Framework
DST/DBE/DHET
2014
Reviewed
MST Education Strategy
2019-2030
MST Implementation
Plan
2005
National Development
Plan (NDP)
2011
CAPS
2012
MST Ministerial Task Team
Report
2013
National Strategy for Mathematics, Science and Technology Education in GET & FET (June 2001)
Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP)
❑ Identified the development of South Africa’s
Human Resource as key to the Growth and
Reconstruction of Society;
❑ President Thabo Mbeki, in his state of nation
addresses during the opening of parliament in
2000 and 2001, emphasised the Centrality of
Mathematics & Science as part of our
Human Resource Development Strategy
(Page 7)
❑ Dedicated Maths & Science Schools
(Dinaledi Schools)❖ LoLT - Strengthen the teaching of English
(First Additional Language) FAL
❖ Special incentives for GIRLS to study Maths &
Science
❖ Supply of competent MST teachers
❖ Incentives for attracting students to train as
Teachers in MST Education
Consolidating, Deepening, and Widening the National Strategy for Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
Implementation Plan (2005-2009):Guiding Principles
• Systemic covering of all the different
levels from Reception Year to Higher
Education;
• Integration of Technology into Teaching
and Learning and Management;
• Improvement of LoLT (English FAL);
• Assignment of Responsibilities and
Indication of the level of the system
responsible for improving
Accountability; and
• Schools will be expected to produce
Results that match the Resources
and the level of attention invested(Cabinet, January 2004)
Implementation Plan for the National Strategy for MST Education in GET and FET• The first thrust - participation and performance by
historically disadvantaged learners, receives most ofthe attention, with shortcomings in the dedicatedschools strategy being a principal concern;
• Acknowledged that Technology Education was notpromoted effectively;
• The document also introduces new terminology:Pillars replaced Thrusts in defining the followingimplementation strategies:A. Improving of Participation and Performance of Girl
Learners.
B. Support for Teaching and Learning.
C. Teacher Development.
D. Provision of Resources.
National Development Plan
(NDP) Goals (2011)
Increase the Number of Students Eligible to Study Mathematics and Sciences at University
• The Commission proposes a target for 2030 of 450 000
learners being eligible for a bachelor's programme with
Mathematics and Physical Sciences.
• Action is required throughout the education system, but
particularly in Early Childhood Development (ECD),
given that the cohort that will enter university in 2030
started Grade 1 in 2018.
• Consideration should be given to expanding the Dinaledi
Schools Initiative, which increases access to
Mathematics and Physical Sciences in underprivileged
schools.
(National Development Plan, Chapter 9, page 305)
Mathematics Achievement at
50% and Above (2017)
Physical Sciences Achievement at
50% and Above (2017)
Improving Literacy, Numeracy/Mathematics and Science Outcomes
• The Commission proposes that 90
percent of learners in grades 3, 6 and 9
must achieve 50 percent or more in the
Annual National Assessments in these
subjects (languages, numeracy and
science).
(National Development Plan, Chapter 9, page 305)
Grade 3 ANA Performance in 2013 and 2014
ProvinceAverage Mark (%)
Acceptable
Achievement (≥ 50%)
2013 2014 2013 2014
EC 50.6 52.2 54.9 58.1
FS 54.9 58.5 63.2 71.0
GP 58.9 60.7 69.6 73.4
KZN 55.5 59.1 64 70.9
LP 45.5 46.8 44.4 48.7
MP 47.8 52.5 50.2 60.3
NC 50.5 53.3 54.0 60.3
NW 49.1 49.3 51.9 53.5
WC 57.4 60.5 66.0 72.6
National 53.1 55.5 59.1 64.5
In the ANA 2014, only Gauteng and Western Cape had reached the 60%
average mark, with Free State in third place with an average mark of 58,5%.
Grade 6 ANA Performance in 2013 and 2014
ProvinceAverage Mark (%)
Acceptable
Achievement (≥ 50%)
2013 2014 2013 2014
EC 33.0 36.8 16.2 23.3
FS 40.0 47.7 26.5 44.0
GP 44.7 51.1 38.4 51.7
KZN 41.2 43.8 30.4 36.4
LP 32.9 35.3 15.3 21.3
MP 33.6 39.9 16.1 27.0
NC 35.6 39.3 20.5 28.2
NW 36.5 38.8 20.8 26.6
WC 44.9 50.9 37.7 50.9
National 39.0 43.1 26.5 35.4
Achievement of learners in Grade 6 was at an average of 43,1% in the ANA
2014, with provinces showing improvement from the ANA 2013 – Gauteng
leading at 51,1%, followed by Western Cape at 50,9% and Free State at
47,7%
Grade 9 ANA Achievement in 2013 and 2014
The analysis of the quality of learner performance (≥ 𝟓𝟎%) revealed an average
performance of 3.4% and 2.9% in 2013 and 2014 respectively. Although these
performance levels are alarmingly low, there were five provinces that performed
below the national average in 2013 and four in 2014. Western Cape Province is
the better performing province, followed by Gauteng and Free State.
ProvinceAverage Mark (%)
Acceptable Achievement
(≥ 50%)
2013 2014 2013 2014
EC 15.8 13.3 3.3 3.3
FS 15.3 12.9 4.1 4.0
GP 15.9 12.4 5.2 4.0
KZN 14.4 10.7 3.4 2.9
LP 9.0 5.9 0.9 0.7
MP 13.7 11.3 1.8 1.9
NC 12.6 9.7 2.4 2.5
NW 13.3 10.6 2.3 1.4
WC 17 13.0 7.2 6.2
National 13.9 10.8 3.4 2.9
Annual National Assessments
• At the end of 2014…
– Grade 3 (55,5%),
– Grade 6 (43,1%),
– Grade 9 (10,9%),
• Learner Performance had not reached the NDP target that envisages “90 percent of learners in Grades 3 (64.5%), Grade 6 (35.4%), and Grade 9 (2,9%) achieving 50 percent or morein the Annual National Assessments”
Improve Performance in International Comparative Studies
• The Department of Basic Education aims to improveSouth Africa's average Southern and East AfricanConsortium for Monitoring Education Quality(SACMEQ) results for Grade 6 languages andMathematics from 495 to 600 points by 2022.
• And to improve average grade 8 (9) scores in theTrends in Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS)from 264 to 420 points by 2023.
• The Commission proposes that grade 8 scores inthe round of TIMSS closest to 2030 should reach500 points.
(National Development Plan, Chapter 9, page 305)
National Strategy for MSTEducation:
Progress in TIMSS
TIMMS progress
• Grade 9 learners in Mathematics in the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS)
• Baseline 352 (2011)
• Achievement 361 (2015)
• First time South Africa participated in TIMSS at the Grade 5
Maths.
• South Africa has shown the largest improvement-– 87 points in Maths
– 90 points in Science
• Gauteng achieved the highest scores in the country-– Maths: 408 and Science: 405
• Eastern Cape has the lowest scores, – Maths: 346 and Science:328
MATHEMATICS SCIENCE
Grade 5 Maths
2015: 376 (3.4)
Grade 9 Maths
2015: 361 (4.5)
2011: 352 (2.5)
2003: 285 (4.2)
Grade 9 Science
2015: 358 (5.6)
2011: 332 (3.7)
2003: 268 (5.5)
2015 Grade 5 Provincial Mathematics Performance
441420
384 376 373 373 367 355 344 343
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
WC GP MP SA NC FS KZ NW LP EC
Difference between the
highest and lowest
performing provinces is
98 points
Grade 9 TIMSSPerformance by Province, 2015
408391
370 369 367 364 361 354 346
405388
348 352 351 356 339 335 328
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
GT WC MP KZ FS NC LP NW EC
Ach
iev
em
en
t sc
ore
Mathematics Science
2015 TIMSS
There is progress made which is evident in the TIMSS analysis whichreflects a significant increase in the number of learners performing aboveminimum level of competence particularly in Mathematics and Sciencefrom 2003 to 2015.
National Strategy for MST Education:
Progress in SACMEQ
READING SCORES IN SACMEQ IV
CountriesReading Score
SACMEQ IV SE S IV – SIII (diff)
1. Seychelles 608.9 11.43 33.9
2. Mauritius 587.8 5.25 13.8
3. Kenya 577.6 5.17 34.6
4. Swaziland 570.1 3.36 21.1
5. Botswana 567.1 5.18 32.1
6. South Africa 538.3 4.26 43.3
7. Namibia 537.8 2.90 40.8
8. Zanzibar 525.7 2.84 -8.3
9. Uganda 512.0 4.48 33
10. Lesotho 510.7 3.89 42.7
11. Zimbabwe 508.4 5.50 0.4
12. Malawi 457.7 3.91 23.7
13. Zambia 456.1 3.88 22.1
SACMEQ 513.3 1.90
MATH SCORES IN SACMEQ IV
CountriesMathematics score
SACMEQ IV SE S IV – SIII (diff)
1. Mauritius 644.1 6.71 21.1
2. Kenya 608.1 5.35 51.1
3. Seychelles 599.1 8.24 48.1
4. Swaziland 577.6 3.11 36.6
5. Botswana 562.9 4.31 41.9
6. South Africa 551.5 4.05 56.5
7. Zimbabwe 524.1 5.25 4.1
8. Uganda 523.2 4.23 41.2
9. Namibia 522.4 2.53 51.4
10. Lesotho 513.5 2.99 36.5
11. Zanzibar 498.6 2.29 12.6
12. Malawi 479.2 2.76 32.2
13. Zambia 477.3 3.08 42.3
SACMEQ IV 523.5 1.61
TEACHER SCORES IN SACMEQ IV
S4 CountryReading Scores
S4 CountryMathematics Scores
Mean SE Mean SE
Seychelles 790.9 14.42 Kenya 927.2 8.34
Zimbabwe 769.1 4.34 Zimbabwe 872.5 5.49
Kenya 744.9 7.30 Uganda 844.9 6.15
Botswana 739.9 3.76 Swaziland 821.7 7.67
Swaziland 729.6 5.54 Seychelles 812.0 19.75
South Africa 726.6 4.94 Botswana 793.9 5.60
Namibia 718.3 3.94 South Africa 780.5 7.18
Zambia 716.8 4.95 Namibia 774.1 6.63
Uganda 696.8 5.03 Malawi 750.2 9.96
Malawi 694.1 7.18 Zambia 732.0 6.99
Lesotho 692.4 4.62 Lesotho 711.5 9.04
Zanzibar 687.5 4.54 Zanzibar 708.9 6.04
Mauritius x x Mauritius x x
SACMEQ IV 720.6 2.06 SACMEQ IV 777.1 3.03
SACMEQ: OVERALL ACHIEVEMENT TRENDS
Overall Mean Scores – Maths & Reading
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8
Rural Urban
SACMEQ IV Project Report, Aug 2017:
Mathematics Competencies of Grade 6 Learners in 2013:
Comparison between Rural Schools and Urban Schools
MST Ministerial Task Team
Recommendations (2013)
MST Ministerial Task Team Report (2013)In 2013, the Minister appointed a Task Team
(MTT) to conduct an investigation into the
implementation of the National Strategy for
Mathematics, Science and Technology
Education in GET & FET (2001)
The recommendations were presented at
the 1st MST Roundtable (June 2013):• Review of the National Strategy to align with
Sector Plan and NDP Goals
• Establishment of a dedicated MST Office in the
Department;
• A focused Teacher Development and Support
Programme;
• Norms and Standards for a Resource
Provisioning and Management Programme;
and
• Strengthening and re-orientation of the Dinaledi
Programme
Revised
National Strategy for
Mathematics, Science and
Technology Education in
GET & FET (2019-2030)
Po
vert
y a
nd
In
eq
uali
ty
National Development Plan (NDP) Prioritisation & Accountability
Un
em
plo
ym
en
t
Oth
er
Re
lev
an
t A
cts
an
d P
oli
cie
s
Wh
ite
Pa
pe
r 1
on
Tra
nsfo
rma
tio
n;
Wh
ite
Pa
pe
r 6
on
In
clu
siv
e E
du
ca
tio
n
Actio
n P
lan
20
14
: F
ram
ew
ork
fo
r T
ea
ch
er
Ed
uca
tio
n
NDP Goals (2030) Number of learners achieving more than 50% in Literacy and Mathematics; 90% of Grade 3,6 and 9 obtaining more than 50% in National Assessments
Learners qualifying to study towards Maths and Science to 450 000; Artisans produced: 30 000 per year; & Increase Participation Rates in FET Colleges to 25%;
MS
T S
trate
gy
(20
01
)
Vision
Inspired Learners Equipped with Mathematics, Science and Technology Competencies to meet the Growing Demands of a Changing World.
Pro
vid
ing
ap
pro
pri
ate
ed
uc
ati
on
al
ma
teri
al
an
d t
rain
ing
;
Mission Increase Learner Participation and Improve Performance of Learners (Grade R – 12) in Mathematics, Science and Technology (MST) by 2030
Mo
bilis
ing
pa
rtne
rsh
ips
to e
nh
an
ce
lea
rnin
g o
utc
om
es
Eff
ecti
ve u
se o
f A
cti
on
Researc
hes/P
ilo
t B
ased
Acti
vit
ies f
or
wid
er
ap
plicati
on
s
School S
ubje
ct P
rofile
s (
Cre
ating F
ocu
sed S
chools
for
Technolo
gy a
nd O
ccupational
Subje
cts
)
Pre-Conditions for Successful Implementation Operational Structural Alignment between DBE and PEDS (Establishment of MST Directorate/Institute)
Development of a Master Plan based on Benchmarks reflected in the NDP with dedicated Budgets/Resources and Timeframes
Mo
bilis
ing
pa
rtne
rsh
ips
to e
nh
an
ce
lea
rnin
g o
utc
om
es
Str
ate
gic
Aim
3
To
Im
pro
ve
Pro
vis
ion
, M
an
ag
em
en
t a
nd
Eff
ec
tiv
e
Uti
liza
tio
n o
f R
es
ou
rce
s
Strategic Aim 1 To Provide Quality Learning for all Learners through Relevant MST Curriculum and
MST Interventions
Stra
teg
ic A
im 4
T
o Im
pro
ve
Pa
rtne
rsh
ip to
En
ha
nc
e Q
ua
lity M
ST
Ed
uc
atio
n G
oa
ls
Incre
ase
Pro
vis
ion
of
Re
so
urc
es
Imp
rove
Ma
na
ge
me
nt
of
Pro
vis
ion
of
Re
so
urc
es
Goals Strengthen the MST Curriculum Responding to the
Skills Needed for a Changing World Strengthen Learners’ Motivation and Awareness
Go
als
E
sta
blis
h N
etw
ork
s to
Enhance S
usta
inable
M
ulti-D
iscip
linary
Sta
kehold
er P
artn
ers
hip
s
inclu
din
g c
oopera
tion in
School B
ase
d
Develo
pm
ents
ls
Stre
ngth
enin
g In
tern
atio
nal N
etw
ork
s to
Add
Valu
e to
MS
T P
rogra
ms
Outputs
Activities
Classroom
Goals Improve Management of MST Teacher Demand,
Supply and Utilization Improve Teacher Capacity, Development and
Support
Strategic Aim 2 To improve Teacher Demand, Supply, Utilization, Development and Support
Principle of Prioritisation (Customisation) Principle of Monitoring, Evaluation and Accountability
Updating Curriculum Content to enhance Innovation, Creativity and Implementation Methods in response to Societal Needs; Developing adequate mechanism to respond to Teacher Demand, Supply, Utilization, Development and Support;
MTT Challenges Alignment between National and Provincial Plans/activities; CAPS Implementation; Annual National Assessment; Lack of District capacity To Support, Coordinate, Monitor and Evaluate MST;
Inadequate quality of MST Teachers; Urban and Multigrade Schools; Language of Learning; Use of ICTs; Lack of Co-ordination with other State Departments
Economy
NDP
Reduce Unemployment
Eradicate Poverty
Develop the Economy
Principles of Prioritisation
and Accountability
MST Strategy(2001)NDP Goals (2030)Learners qualifying to study towards Mathematics and Physical Sciences to 450 000;Artisans produced: 30 000 per year;Number of learners achieving more than 50% in Mathematics;Increase participation rates in TVET Colleges to 25%;90% of Grade 3,6 and 9 obtaining more than 50% in national assessment.MTT ChallengesAlignment between National and Provincial Plans/activities;Effective CAPS Implementation;Annual National Assessment;Lack of District Capacity to support, coordinate, monitor and evaluate MSTInadequate quality of MST Teachers;Rural and Multigrade SchoolsLanguage of LearningUse of ICTsLack of Co-ordination with other State Departments.Other Relevant Acts and PoliciesWhite Paper 1 on Transformation;White Paper 6 on Inclusive EducationAction Plan 2014: Framework for Teacher Education
VISIONInspired Learners Equipped with
Mathematics, Science and Technology
Competencies to meet the growing
demands of a Changing World.
MissionIncrease learner participation and
improve performance of learners from
Birth to Grade 12 in Mathematics, Science
and Technology (MST) by:
• Updating curriculum contents to
enhance innovation, creativity and
implementation methods in response to
societal needs;
• Developing adequate mechanism to
respond to Teacher Demand, Supply,
Utilisation, Development and Support;
• Providing appropriate educational
material and training;
• Mobilising partnerships to enhance
learning outcomes
Pre-conditions for successful Implementation)
• Operational Structural alignment between DBE and PEDS
(Establishment of MST Directorate/Institute)
• Development of a master plan based on benchmarks
reflected in the National Development Plan with dedicated
Budgets/Resources and Timeframes
• Effective use of Action Researchers/Pilot Based Activities
for wider applications
• School Subject Profiles (Creating Focused Schools for
Technology and Occupational Subjects through
revolutionary process)
• Capacitation of Subject Advisory Service to provide
leadership for teaching methodology for4th industrial
revolution.
• Principle of Prioritisation (Customisation)
• Principle of Monitoring, Evaluation and Accountability
(evidence based and data driven).
• Develop agreement on roles and accountability of DBE and
State Depts, Unions, Academia and Business towards the
realisation of the goals of MST Strategy
• Particular attention should be given to the expansion of
Focused schools of learning to promote:
• Agriculture
• Technology/Occupational Subjects
• Arts as a methodology of teaching
Effective use
of Action
Researchers/
Pilot Based
Activities for
wider
Applications
Evaluating existing pilots on MST Education with a view to
expanding activities that have great potential of enhancing
learning and teaching including compiling successful “Case
Studies” on Interventions related to resources, procurement
and/or management (e.g. implementation of MST
Conditional Grant)
A collective agreement with DBE and other relevant
Departments, Unions, Academia and Business on their
roles in supporting and being accountable for the realisation
of the goals of the MST Strategy.
Identifying critical curriculum needs to support Academic,
Technical and Occupational Skills to enhance the quality
of Teaching and Learning in the MST subjects.
Reviewing the existing Post Provisioning Norms to make
provisions for additional MST teachers in under resourced
schools, Multi-Grade Schools and Focused MST
Schools; Research and acceleration of implementation of
Models similar to the Three Streams Model;
Clarifying the Language of Learning and Teaching of the
MST education in Foundation Phase and schooling in
general
Identifying and promoting IKS (Indigenous Knowledge
System) based on researches done in Africa for possible
integration into MST Education
Developing creative teaching methodologies through the
integration of Arts and ICTs in the teaching of Mathematics,
Science, Technology and Engineering across the curriculum
would further enhance the methodology for the promotion of
the softer skills.
Developing and promoting a wider range of subjects related
to Engineering including Civil Engineering, Electrical
Engineering, Mechanical engineering and other related
areas.
Research methodologies and mechanisms to attract the
best teachers to work in rural schools.
Quality Learning and Teaching
Relevant Curriculum taught by
competent and professionally
qualified teachers with the
necessary resources to
Inspire and equip learners with
competencies for the demands of
a changing world.Social justice, Information, creativity,
problem solving, initiation, responsibility,
endurance, utilization, collaboration,
negotiation, globalization, artistic.
CLASSROOM
Strategic Aim 1To Provide Quality Learning for All Learners through Relevant
MST Curriculum and Interventions
Goal 1
Strengthen MST curriculum to
respond to the skills needed for a
changing world with specific
reference to the
4th Industrial Revolution and taking
cognisance of Arts and ICTs
across the curriculum.
Output 1
Address the status of the MST subjects
(Futuristic vision)
Output 2
Strengthening the grounding of MST subjects in the
ECD - G12 to align the curriculum of MST subjects to
further technical, occupational and professional
career pathways
Output 3
Ensure quality performance in MST subjects.
Goal 2
Strengthen Learners Motivation
and Awareness
Output 4
Increase learner participation from historically
under-represented groups
Output 5
Provide opportunities in learning of MST subjects to
improve learner motivation and encourage
participation and learning. (Focus on Skills for the
4th Industrial Revolution
Strategic Aim 2To Improve Teacher Demand, Supply, Utilization, Development and Support
Goal 3:
Improve Management of
MST Teacher Demand, Supply
and Utilisation
Output 6
Support Recruitment and Training of New, High
Quality MST Teachers
Output 7
Strengthen Retention of MST Teachers
Output 8
Improve synergy between pre-service teacher
training programmes and school curriculum
Goal 4
Improve Teacher Capacity,
Development and Support
Output 9
Support Continuous Professional Development
(CPU) of teachers to respond to the needs of the
4th Industrial Revolution.
Output 10
Enhance support to increase teachers’
confidence in MST pedagogics (focus on skills for
the 4th Industrial Revolution) and Assessment
Strategic Aim 3To Improve Provision, Management and Effective Utilisation of Resources
Goal 5
Increase Provision of Resources
Linking with MST Curriculum
Output 11
Facilitate development and
distribution of Additional Resources
linking with MST Curriculum
Goal 6
Improve Management of Provision
of Resources
Output 12
Improve Effective Management and
Monitoring of the
MST Conditional Grant
Strategic Aim 4To Improve Partnership to Enhance Quality MST Education
Goal 7
Establish Networks to Enhance
Sustainable Multi-Disciplinary
Stakeholder Partnerships
Output 13
Establish/enhance sustainable
multi-stakeholder partnerships and
collaborate with various institutions
including NECT, DST, DHET and SETAs
Goal 8
Strengthening International
Networks to Add Value to MST
Programs
Output 14
Strengthening Networking to Learn
from International Experiences in
MST Education
MST Education Strategy
Implementation Plan
Revised MST Education Strategy
(2019-2030)
Inspired Learners Equipped with Mathematics, Science and
Technology Competencies to meet the growing demands of a
Changing World.
NDP MTT
Recommendations4th Industrial
Revolution
Other
Departmental
Policies
Establishment and Capacitation of Well-Resourced Schools for
Academic, Technical and Occupational Subjects at an Accelerated Pace
in line with International Trends and Standards .
MST Education Strategy: Strategic Structure/Approach
Inspired Learners Equipped with
Mathematics, Science and Technology
Competencies to meet the growing demands
of a Changing World.
Strategic Aim1To Provide Quality
Learning for All Learners through
Relevant MST Curriculum and Interventions
Strategic Aim2To improve
Teacher Demand, Supply,
Utilization, Development and Support
Strategic Aim3To Improve Provision,
Management and Effective Utilization of
Resources
Strategic Aim4To Improve
Partnership to Enhance Quality MST Education
“Strong foundation of competencies on MST subjects” “Up-to-date/Real Life based MST Education”
Research Monitoring and Evaluation
INTENDED CURRICULUM (Research, Policy Development, Planning. • National Curriculum: Academic; Technical and Occupational
subjects including LSED.
• Substantially increase Focused Schools including Technical and Occupational schools of learning
• Provision for differentiated PPN for Rural and Multi-grade Schools.
• Provision of guidelines for textbooks, guides, equipment and facilities.
• Develop Norms and Standards for capacity to support, monitor and evaluate MST Programmes
• Develop Norms and Standards for operational structures to ensure alignment across National and Provincial Education Departments.
• Develop comprehensive teacher development programmes based on Content, methodology and problem solving
• Provide targets (benchmarks) for National and Provincial Education Departments.
IMPLEMENTED CURRICULUM (Implementation)
• All learners have textbooks, guides for all subjects.
• Competent and professionally qualified teachers for all MST subjects including Academic, Technical, Occupational and LSED to ensure quality learning and teaching in implementing curriculum.
• Equipment and facilities available for all streams.
• HODs and Subject Advisors support, monitor and evaluate curriculum implementation.
• Partnerships to enhance learning and Teaching.
ATTAINED CURRICULUM (Measuring Success – Reduce gap between
Intended Curriculum and Attained Curriculum.
• Assessments including School based assessments, Provincial, National and International.
• Analysis and Interpretation of Goals/Targets including review of strategy.
• Ensure accountability
Feedbacks
(Action Research/
Monitoring and
evaluation
Futuristic
Vision, Arts,
ICTs across
the
curriculum.
STEM,
STEAM Creativity
Problem-
solving
InnovationLearning
Outcomes
Policy Dialogue
Scope of SubjectsMST Education Strategy in the GET and FET
MATHEMATICS SCIENCES TECHNOLOGY
ECD Birth to 4
• Exploring
Mathematics
Grade R- 3
• Mathematics
Grade 4-6
• Mathematics
Grade 7-9
• Mathematics
Grade 10-12
• Mathematics
• Technical Mathematics
• Mathematical Literacy
ECD Birth to 4
• Knowledge and
understanding of the World
Grade R-3
• Life Skills (Natural Sciences)
Grade 4-6
• Natural Science & Technology
Grades 7-9
• Natural Sciences
Grades 10-12
• Agricultural Sciences
• Life Sciences
• Physical Sciences
• Technical Sciences
ECD Birth to 4
• Knowledge and understanding of
the World
Grade R-3
• Life Skills
Grade 4-6
• Natural Science & Technology
Grades 7-9
• Natural Science
• Technology
Grades 10-12
• Agricultural Management Practices
• Agricultural Technology
• Computer Applications Technology
• Information Technology
• Engineering Graphics & Design
(EGD)
• Civil Technology
• Electrical Technology
• Mechanical Technology
High Impact Activities & Interventions
0
50 000
100 000
150 000
200 000
250 000
300 000
350 000
400 000
450 000
500 000
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
No of Learners with Bachelor passes in Mathematics, Science or both
Target 450 000 by year 2030
NDP TARGETS: BACHELOR PASSES WITH
MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE 450 000 BY YEAR 2030
629103
802913
975945
1186268
96509
191952
322743
450000
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1400000
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Total number ofLearners
NDP Target: Learnerswith Bachelor Pass inMaths and Science
NDP Targets: Learners with Bachelor Passes
in Mathematics & Science
Quality of Passes:
Provincial Performance
MST EDUCATION STRATEGY (2019 -2030)
IMPLEMENTATION TARGETS
• The table below reflects key policy directives and guidelines(assumptions) for the projected targets for 2030 and are based onthe following:
– The ratio between Science and Technology is 75% : 25%
– The ratio between Mathematics/Tech Maths and Maths Lit is60% : 40%;
– There is an average percentage growth of 5% pa in the numberof learners at grade 12 (between 2014 and 2017 the growth hasbeen 4.9% pa);
– There would be a 10% gravitation towards Science andTechnology towards 2030 (There has been an average of 1%per year shift towards Science and Technology since 2015 to2017);
– Tech Maths and Tech Science will account for 1.5% and 2%respectively (no baseline at this stage)
Participation Rate:
Number of Learners at
Offering MST Subjects
276084
388912
543529
693967
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
20172018201920202021202220232024202520262027202820292030
Participation Rate: Mathematics Grade 12 Targets
Mathematics
197960
274905
380348
482942
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Participation Rate:Physical Sciences Grade 12 Targets
PhysicalSciences
Quality of Passes:
Percentage of Learners who will obtain more than 50%
22,2
37,8
45,8
50,0
0,0
10,0
20,0
30,0
40,0
50,0
60,0
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Success Rate at 50% and above:Mathematics Targets
Mathematics
26,9
39,8
46,5
50,0
0,0
10,0
20,0
30,0
40,0
50,0
60,0
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Success Rate at 50% and above:Physical Sciences Targets
PhysicalSciences
High Impact Interventions
Implementation Structure
• The establishment of MST Directorates/Institutesboth at the National and provincial levels with thenecessary structure and capacity to ensure:• effective co-ordination,• support,• monitoring; and• alignment of the MST Education strategic
activities across the provinces.
• Continuous review of MST curriculum offeringsresponding to the skills required for the 4th IndustrialRevolution including low participating subjects e.g.Technology, and Agricultural Sciences
• Research and Develop Conceptual Frameworks for
the teaching and learning of Mathematics, Science
and Technology Subjects, including Curriculum for:• Agricultural Sciences (Grade R-9)
• Natural Sciences (Grade R-3)
• Technology (Grade R-3)
• Computer Studies (Grade 4-9)
High Impact Interventions
National
High Impact Interventions• Continuous review of MST curriculum offerings
responding to the skills required for the 4th industrialrevolution including low participating subjects (e.g.Technology and Agricultural Science) taking cognisanceof the contribution of Indigenous Knowledge to the worldof Science and engineering.
• Also critical is the introduction of subject areas in linewith STEM and should include:
• Ocean and Marine Engineering• Aerospace engineering• Robotics• Biomedical Engineering• Earth and Space Sciences• Earth and Human Sciences
Mathematics Teaching and Learning Framework
• The Minister of Basic Education, Mrs A Motshekga, MP hosted aMathematics Indaba on 12-14 December 2016;
• The Indaba was hosted under the theme: ‘Meaningful and effectiveMathematics teaching and learning: In search of the ‘South Africanpedagogical identity’ ;
• The purpose of the Indaba was to initiate a dialogue to meaningfullyaddress the problem of low achievement levels in Mathematics in SouthAfrica;
• The Maths Indaba of 2016 recommended the appointment of aMinisterial Maths Task Team (MMTT) to develop a National Frameworkon the approach to the teaching and learning of Mathematics;
• The MMTT consisting of 14 members from various sectors wasappointed ;
• The draft framework was developed and presented to the Minister on the19th March 2018;
• The Minister approved the work of the Task Team and requested that theFramework be popularised and discussed more widely in preparation forimplementation in 2019.
• Implementing the developed national frameworkon the teaching and learning approach ofmathematics in South Africa
• A balanced approach to teaching and learningfor MST subjects underpinned by the followingkey dimensions as reflected in the MathematicsFramework:
• Conceptual Understanding• Mathematical Procedures• Learners' Own Strategies• Reasoning
High Impact Interventions
National
CONCEPTUAL
UNDERSTANDING
LEARNERS’ OWN
STRATEGIES
MATHEMATICAL
PROCEDURES
REASONING
DYNAMIC CLASSROOM CULTURE
Act
ive
lear
nin
g
Inve
stig
ativ
e te
ach
ing
Pu
rpo
sefu
l ass
essm
ent
Co
nce
pt
dev
elo
pm
ent
Pro
ced
ura
l flu
ency
Ap
plic
atio
n o
f m
ath
s
Mat
hs
lan
gu
age
Lo
gic
al r
easo
nin
g
Err
or
anal
ysis
Mu
ltip
le r
epre
sen
tati
on
s
Pro
ble
m s
olv
ing
Mathematics Teaching and Learning Frameworkfor South Africa: Teaching Mathematics for Understanding
The Mathematics Framework Design
Four sections
1. Introduction to situate the Framework in the context of
teaching and learning Mathematics in South Africa
2. Framework exposition to outline and explain with examples
3. Phase exemplars to inspire teachers and offer guidance on
implementing the 4 dimensions in the classroom
4. Implications of the Framework in key areas like
assessment, LTSM, LoLT, ICTs, teacher development
The formula for the area of a triangle is
Area = 1
2𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 × ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡
Where does this formula come from?
Phase: SeniorDimension in focus: Conceptual understanding
Formula for area of a triangle
is derived from formula for
area of a rectangle.
Area ∆ = 1
2𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 × ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡
= 1
2𝒂𝒓𝒆𝒂 𝒐𝒇 𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒈𝒍𝒆
Phase: SeniorDimension in focus: Conceptual understanding
Phase: SeniorDimension in focus: Conceptual understanding
Area ∆ = 1
2𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 × ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡
= 1
2𝒂𝒓𝒆𝒂 𝒐𝒇 𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒈𝒍𝒆
=𝒃𝒂𝒔𝒆 × 𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕
𝟐
Implications of the Framework for the Sector
Brief notes on the implications of the Framework
discussed under the following headings:
• Curriculum
• Assessment
• Learning and Teaching Support Materials (LTSM)
• Information and Communication (ICT)
• Teacher development (pre- and in-service)
• Language of Learning and Teaching (LoLT)
National
High Impact Interventions
• Agreement through a collective accordwith DBE, DHET, DST, Unions, Business,Academia and other key stakeholders.
• National assessments and internationalassessments to be used continuously asa means of monitoring the successesand/or challenges in the implementation ofthe MST Education Strategy both at theGET and FET bands.
National Provincial
High Impact Interventions
• Teacher development :– a critical dimension to implement a nationwide teacher
development programme focusing on content and methodologyusing Arts and ICT and aligned to specific needs based on acompetency audit.
– Extensive support by Subject advisors who are key in supportingteachers
• MST Resources:– Provision of appropriate facilitates, equipment and learning support
materials in accordance with CAPS (national guidelines).
• Competent MST Teachers:– Mechanisms to attract and retain highly qualified and professional
MST teachers.
High Impact Programmes
MST Implementation Plan:
• Prioritising Relevant intervention programmesto improve participation and performance ofhistorically disadvantaged learners includinglearners with special educational needs.
• These interventions may include amongst others:
– HeyMath;
– Talent search by University of Witwatersrand;
– IBP solution by Free State University;
– Telematics by Stellenbosch University;
– Sasol Inzalo Camps and LTSM; and
– Teach South Africa (TeachSA) by Deloitte.
MST Implementation Plan: Effective Implementation Conditions
• Ensuring that well-balanced Intervention Programmes are facilitated inthe Three Phases of the Curriculum:– Intended Curriculum;– Implemented Curriculum; and– Attained Curriculum.
• A system of accountability:– Consistent Monitoring and Evaluation;– Appropriate Managerial Tools by DBE together with PEDs and other relevant
stakeholders has the capacity to fulfil the achievement of the targets of NDP.
• Ultimately, every classroom should be a space where quality learningand teaching is evident through:– relevant curriculum;– taught by competent and professionally qualified teachers;– with the necessary resources;– to inspire learners with competencies for the demands of the changing world;
which would include skills related to the Arts, Creativity, Innovation, InformationAnalysis, Problem Solving, Endurance, Collaboration, Negotiation, Globalisation andJustice.
MST Education Strategy - Moving ForwardTime
Frame MST Implementation Plan Key Activities
Short
Term
2018-2021
• MST Directorate with capacity established
• National and Provincial implementations plans in place
• Field Testing (showcasing) of MST Education Strategy in a few Districts
• Framework developed for strengthening of curriculum (Mathematics
Framework)
• Conceptual Framework for comprehensive Teacher Development
Programme and showcased
• Relevant Provincial Intervention programmes implemented,
monitored and evaluated
• Guidelines on Norms and Standards for MST Infrastructure/Resources
• Established accord with Key Stakeholders
Medium
Term
2022-2025
• Full scale implementation of teacher development programmes
• Review of MST Curriculum in line with Framework
• Review of Targets against Plan
• Full-scale implementation of MST Education Strategy
• Mechanisms to attract and retain quality MST Teachers in place
• All schools fully equipped with necessary resources and capacity
Long
Term
2026-2030
• Every classroom has competent and qualified MST Teachers
• Monitor and evaluate MST Strategic actions against outputs
• Continuous review of Curriculum
• Review MST Education Strategy in terms of Findings and
Recommendations