mathematical sciences he curriculum innovation project · mathematics curriculum matthew inglis,...

40
Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Graduates’ Views on the Undergraduate Mathematics Curriculum

Upload: others

Post on 22-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project

Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews

Graduates’ Views on the Undergraduate

Mathematics Curriculum

Page 2: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University
Page 3: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Graduates’ Views on the Undergraduate

Mathematics Curriculum

Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews

Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

The production of this report was financially supported by a grant from the MSOR Network as part of the Mathematical Sciences Strand of the National HE STEM Programme (to M.I. & T.C.)

and a Royal Society Worshipful Company of Actuaries Research Fellowship (to M.I.).

Page 4: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Graduates’ Views on the Undergraduate Mathematics Curriculum

Page 5: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Contents

1. Executive Summary 5

2. Introduction 7

3. Method 9

3.1 Participantrecruitment 9

3.2 Surveydesign 9

3.3 Responserate 11

4. Results 13

4.1 Samplecharacteristics 13

4.2 Developmentversusimportance 13

4.2.1 Cluster1 13 4.2.2 Cluster2 14 4.2.3 Cluster3 15 4.2.4 Cluster4 15 4.2.5 Workplaceversusfurtherstudy 15

4.3 Underdevelopedknowledge/skills 17

4.4 Teachinganddelivery 18

4.4.1 Teachingquality 18 4.4.2 Teachingstyle 19 4.4.3 Theneedformorerealworldapplications 19 4.4.4 Peersupport 20 4.4.5 Group/teamwork 20 4.4.6 Thedevelopmentofgenericskills 20 4.4.7 Coursework,assessmentandfeedback 20 4.4.8 Coursenotes 20

4.5 Developingundergraduatemathematicsdegrees 21

4.5.1 Genericskills 21 4.5.2 Realworldapplications 21 4.5.3 Modulechoices 22 4.5.4 Useofsoftwarepackagesandcomputerprogramming 22 4.5.5 Careersadvice 22

4.6 Comparinggraduateswithincomingundergraduates 23

4.6.1 Group1 23 4.6.2 Group2 23

5. Discussion 27

5.1 Genericcognitiveskills 27

5.2 Genericnon-cognitiveskills 27

5.3 Applyingmathematicstotherealworld 28

6. Conclusion 31

References 33

Contents

Page 6: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Graduates’ Views on the Undergraduate Mathematics Curriculum

Page 7: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

1. Executive Summary

InWinter2011wesurveyedtheviewsof428mathematicsgraduatesfromthe2008/9graduating cohort. Each graduate was asked to reflect on the knowledge/skills they believed thattheydevelopedduringtheirmathematicalstudy,andtoassesshowusefultheseskillshavebeenduringtheircareertodate.Wewerealsoabletobenchmarkthesedataagainstanearliersurveyofincomingundergraduates’expectations.

Ouroverallgoalwastodeterminewhetherthehighereducationmathematicssyllabusadequatelypreparesstudentsfortheworkplace.

Wefoundamixedpicture:

• Anoverwhelmingmajorityofgraduatesbelievedthattheysuccessfullydevelopedgenericcognitiveskillsduringtheirstudies(e.g.logicalreasoning,criticalthinkingandproblemsolving).Furthermore,therewaswidespreadagreementthattheseskillsareusefulintheworkplace.

• However,fewerstudentsbelievedthattheirstudieshaddevelopedgenericnon-cognitiveskillssuchasmakingpresentations,oralandwrittencommunication,teamworkingorcomputerliteracy.Alltheseskillswereconsideredtobeusefulintheworkplace,butareapparentlynotwelldevelopedbystudyingundergraduatemathematics.Furthermore,wefoundthatincomingundergraduatesexpectedtodevelopthesenon-cognitivegenericskillsduringtheirmathematicalstudy,suggestingthatthereisamismatchbetweenstudents’expectationsandoutcomes.

• Whenaskedtoselectwhatskillgraduateswishedtheyhadhadtheopportunitytodevelopmoreduringtheirmathematicalstudies,themostcommonlyselectedwas“applyingmathematicstotherealworld”.Over90%ofincomingundergraduatesexpectedtodevelopthisskill,whereasonlyaround60%ofgraduatesbelievedthattheyhad.

Thisreportraisestwoissuestoconsider.First,whetherthemathematicalcommunityis(orshould be) satisfied with the range of skills that graduates perceive the current higher education curriculum to develop. And second, if the community is satisfied by the current situation, how theapparentmismatchweobservedbetweenincomingstudents’expectationsandgraduates’perceivedoutcomescanbeaddressed.

Executive Summary

Page 8: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Graduates’ Views on the Undergraduate Mathematics Curriculum

Page 9: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

2. Introduction

ThisdocumentreportstheoutcomeofasurveyofrecentgraduatesofmathematicsprogrammesacrosstheUK.Theaimofthestudywastoexplorewhatpartsofthehighereducationcurriculumgraduatesvaluehavingstudied,andwhatelsetheyfeeltheywouldhavebenefited from, had it been included.

Several recent studies have focused on the specific mathematical requirements of particular industries(includingbanking,nursingandmanufacturing,e.g.Hoyles,Noss,&Pozzi,2001;Noss&Hoyles,1996;Smith,1999),buttheseinvestigationsareperhapsnotofdirectuseforawould-becurriculumreformer:clearly,mostmathematicsgraduateswillnotgointonursing.Topartiallyaddressthisissue,Wood(2010)interviewed18recentmathematicsgraduates(fromAustralianuniversities)abouttheirtransitiontotheworkplaceinavarietyofdifferentindustries.Shefoundamismatchbetweentheskillsgraduatesbelievedtheyneedfortheworkplace,andthosetheybelievedtheydevelopedduringtheirundergraduatestudies.Inparticular,herparticipantsnotedalackofgenericskilldevelopmentintheircourses(communication,team-workingetc.).Sheconcluded:

While it is important that graduates are able to perform mathematical and computing techniques and know the relevant jargon and notations, it is essential that they are able to communicate their knowledge in a variety of circumstances and work in multidisciplinary teams in the workplace.(p.197).

Ourgoalinthissurveywastwofold.First,toasksimilarquestionstothoseaddressedbyWood(2010),butinthecontextoftheUKhighereducationsector.Second,tobroadenthescopeof Wood’s study by asking considerably more graduates to reflect on their transition to the workplace(orfurtherstudy)thanwouldbepossibleusinganinterviewapproach.

Consequently,weadoptedasimilarapproachtothatusedbyHansonandOverton(2010a,2010b)intheirstudyofchemistryandphysicsgraduates,bysurveyingrecentmathematicsgraduatesfromUKuniversities.Wefocusedonthe2008/9graduatingcohort,sothatbythetimeofthesurvey(November2011–February2012),participantshadhadapproachingtwoandahalfyear’sexperienceofworkorpostgraduatestudy.Thusparticipantswouldhavehadsuffcienttimetogainanunderstandingoftheskillsrequirementsoftheiremployment(orstudy),whilestillretainingamemoryofwhattheyhadlearntatuniversity.

Introduction

Page 10: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Graduates’ Views on the Undergraduate Mathematics Curriculum

Page 11: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

3. Method

3.1 Participant recruitment

We first approached the head of each UK mathematics department, seeking their support for thesurvey.Ofthe68headscontacted,54(79%)supportedthesurvey,1declinedto,andtheremainderdidnotrespond(afterareminder).Wethencontactedall68institutions’careers/alumni offices with a request that they send an email inviting their mathematics graduates from2008/9totakepartinthesurvey(indicatingthatthesurveyhadthesupportoftheirmathematicsdepartmentwhereappropriate).Graduateswhowishedtotakepartinthesurveyclickedalinkintheemail,whichtookthemtothesurveywebsite.Toencourageemailrecipientstocompletethesurvey,aprizedrawwasofferedasanincentivetoparticipants.

Theinvitationemailwassentby40institutions(59%).Sevenuniversitiesexplicitlydeclinedtoparticipate(10%),andtheremainderdidnotreply(afterreminders).Oneinstitutioncontactedtheiralumnibyemailandsentcopiesbyposttoalumniwhodidnothaveavalidemailaddress.Anotherusedtextmessagingwhereemailaddresseswerenotavailable.

Afteraperiodofapproximatelyeightweeks,institutionswhohadsenttheemailwerecontactedagainwitharequesttosendareminderemail,17institutions(43%)respondedthattheyhaddoneso.Weareextremelygratefulforthesupportofallparticipatinguniversitiesandmathematicsdepartments.

3.2 Survey design

Theaimofthesurveywastodeterminegraduates’viewsabouttheskillsandknowledgethattheyhaddevelopedduringtheirmathematicsdegreeprogrammes,andtheextenttowhichthesehadbeenusefulsincegraduation.

We first created a list of areas of mathematical knowledge—based on the QAA’s (2007) subject benchmark standards—and a list of ‘generic skills’, based on those used by the ‘More Maths Grads’ survey of incoming mathematics undergraduates (Challis, Robinson, & Thomlinson,2009a,2009b;Robinson,Thomlinson,&Challis,2009;Thomlinson,Challis,&Robinson,2009).ThefulllistofknowledgeandskillsmentionedinthesurveyareshowninTable1.

Thesurveyconsistedofawebsitewithfourpages,andcloselyfollowedthestructureofHansonand Overton’s (2010a, 2010b) physical sciences surveys. On the first page we asked participants forsomebackgroundpersonalinformation(theuniversityatwhichtheystudied,theirdegree,andtheircurrentemployment/studystatus).Onthesecondandthirdpagesweaskedparticipantstoconsidereachoftheskills/knowledgelistedinTable1,andtoanswertwoquestions:

1.Howwelldidyourcourseassistyouindevelopingtheknowledgeandskillsbelow?

2.Pleaseindicatetheimportanceoftheareasofknowledgeandskillslistedbelowforyourcareersofar.

Participants responded using a four-point Likert scale (“A lot”, “Quite a bit”, “Not much”, “Not at all” for the first question above; and “Very important”, “Quite important”, “Not very important” and“Notatallimportant”forthesecondquestion).

On the fourth page we asked participants to select up to five of the items from Table 1 which they,inretrospect,wishedtheyhadbeengiventheopportunitytodevelopmorewithintheirundergraduate degree. Participants were also asked to state, using a five point Likert scale (stronglyagree,agree,neutral,disagree,stronglydisagree),theextenttowhichtheyagreedwithaquotetakenfromtheSmithReport:

Method

Page 12: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Graduates’ Views on the Undergraduate Mathematics Curriculum

10

Mathematical training disciplines the mind, develops logical and critical reasoning, and develops analytical and problem-solving skills to a high degree. (Smith, 2004, p. 11)

Thefourthpagealsocontainedseveralfurtherquestions,whichparticipantswereinvitedtoanswerusingafreetextbox:

• Pleaseprovideanycommentswhichyouthinkmaybeusefulindevelopingundergraduatemathematicsdegrees.

• If you had had the opportunity to influence how your undergraduate degree had been taught inordertoimprovethelearningoutcomese.g.teachingstyle,modeofdelivery,peertutoring/mentoring,whatwouldyousuggest?

• Additionally,ifyouwish,pleaseexplainorexpandonanyoftheanswersyouhavegivenabove.

Finally,participantswerethankedfortheirtime,andinvitedtoentertheprizedraw.

MathematicalKnowledge

Algebra(e.g.GroupTheory,LinearAlgebra,RingTheoryetc.) Analysis Calculus Geometry/Topology Numbertheory DifferentialEquations Fluid/SolidMechanics MathematicalPhysics MathematicalModelling Statistics&Probability AppliedStatistics MathematicalComputing(e.g.MATLAB,MAPLE) MathematicsEducation HistoryofMathematics

GenericSkills

LogicalThinking* Analyticalapproachtoworking* Applyingmathematicstorealworldproblems* Thinking in abstract ways about difficult concepts* Researchskills* Timemanagementskills* Writtencommunication* Oralcommunication* Makingpresentations* Computer literacy (e.g. MS Office)* Problem-solvingskills Team-workingskills Independentlearningskills

Table 1: The knowledge/skills which we asked participants to reflect upon. Items marked with an asterisk were also included in the More Maths Grads survey (see Section 4.6).

Page 13: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

11

3.3 Response rate

Institutionswereaskedtoadvisehowmanyemailshadbeensentsothatresponseratestothe survey could be monitored (although this was not possible for five universities, implying that all response rate figures reported here are approximate). In total 428 responses were received, whichrepresentedanoverallapproximateresponserateof13%(402responseswerereceivedfromthe3213emailssentbyuniversitieswhowereabletokeeptrackofthenumbertheysent,plusafurther26responsesfromuniversitieswhowerenot).Therewaswidevariationinresponseratesbetweeninstitutions.ThenumberofresponsesreceivedfromthedifferentuniversitymissiongroupsisshowninTable2.

MissionGroup N Approx%

1994Group 113 16Million+Group 4 –RussellGroup 251 11UniversityAlliance 8 22Unaffiliated 52 18

Table 2: The number of responses (with approximate response rate) obtained from each university mission group.

Oneuniversitywasabletomaketheirdeliverystatisticsavailable,showninTable3.Thesurveyresponserateforthisinstitutionwas12%,neartotheoverallsurveyresponserateof13%.However, as Table 3 indicates, a significant percentage of this institution’s emails were not openedbytheirrecipients,perhapsindicatingthatgraduatesdonotalwayskeepuniversitiesinformed about the email address they most regularly monitor. If this institution’s figures are representativeofthesituationacrossthecountry,thenapproximately46%ofalumniwhoreadour invitation to participate in the survey did so (although we emphasise that given the difficulty of tracking email deliveries, this figure can only be considered a crude approximation).

EmailStatus N %

Sent 207 100Notdelivered 3 1

Notopened 149 72

Opened 55 27

Surveyresponses 24 12

Table 3: Email delivery statistics from one participating institution.

Method

Page 14: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Graduates’ Views on the Undergraduate Mathematics Curriculum

1�

Page 15: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

1�

4. Results

4.1 Sample characteristics

Atotalof428responseswerereceived.Themajorityofparticipantshadstudiedforabachelorsdegree(73%),withtheremainderhavingstudiedforanundergraduatemastersdegree(MMathorequivalent).Toinvestigatewhetherparticipantshadtakenstraightmathematicsdegrees(asopposed to joint degrees), we asked them to state how many of their final year modules had beenmathematics.ResponsestothisquestionareshowninTable4.Aminorityofparticipants(6%)hadtakenadegreecontaininganindustrialplacement.

NumberofFinalYearMathematicsModules %

Allmodules 56Mostmodules 23

Abouthalfmymodules 13

Somemodules 4

Table 4: A breakdown of how many final year modules taken by participants consisted of mathematics.

Amajorityofparticipantsstatedthattheiractivitiessincegraduatinghadeitherinvolvedmathematicstosomeextent(30%),toalargeextent(19%),ortoaverylargeextent(28%).Alargemajorityofparticipantswereinemployment(75%),whileasubstantialnumberwereengagedinfurtherstudy(37%),aroundhalfofwhomwerestudyingastheirprimaryactivity(19%).Asmallminorityofparticipantswereunemployedandlookingforwork(3%).Wefoundfewinterestingdifferencesinresponsesbetweenthosewhowereinworkandthoseinfurtherstudy(althoughnotebelowwherethesedifferencesdidarise).

4.2 Development versus importance

We asked each participant to reflect upon the knowledge/skills listed in Table 1 and to estimate(a)howimportanteachhadbeenintheircareerstodate(whetherworking,trainingorundertakingotheractivities),and(b)howwelltheircourseassistedthemindevelopingeach.

ForeachentryinTable1,wecalculatedthepercentageofparticipantswhorespondedpositively: selected “Very important” or “Quite important” for question (a), and “A lot” or “Quite a lot” for question (b). To facilitate interpretation of these data, we standardised these figures and enteredthemintoahierarchicalclusteranalysis(usingWard’smethodandaEuclideansquaredmetric).Thisresultedinfourclustersofknowledge/skills.

4.2.1 Cluster 1

Cluster1consistedofknowledge/skillswhichparticipantsperceivedasimportantintheircareer,andwhichtheyconsideredhadbeenwelldevelopedbytheirmathematicalstudy.Sixdifferentareas of knowledge/skill fell into this cluster, as shown in Figure 1. These tended to be the ‘cognitive skills’traditionallyassociatedwithstudyingmathematics(logicalthinking,problemsolvingetc).

RecallthatwealsoaskedparticipantstodirectlyrespondtoaquotefromtheSmithReportwhichassertedthatstudyingmathematicsdevelopsgenericcognitiveskills(“Mathematicaltrainingdisciplinesthemind,developslogicalandcriticalreasoning,anddevelopsanalyticalandproblem-solvingskillstoahighdegree”).ResponsestothisquestionareshowninFigure2.AlargemajorityofparticipantsagreedwithSmith’s(2004)suggestion(79%).Oneparticipantexplained:

A mathematics degree definitely exercises the brain, it requires logic, patience, understanding and problem solving skills. It’s extremely hard work, this statement explains it well.

Results

Page 16: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Graduates’ Views on the Undergraduate Mathematics Curriculum

1�

Whetherornotstudyingmathematicsdoesdevelopsuchskillsisamatterofdebateamongeducationalistsandpsychologists(e.g.,Huckstep,2000,2007;Inglis&Simpson,2009;Lehman&Nisbett,1990;Nisbett,Fong,Lehman,&Cheng,1987;Thorndike,1924),butitisclearfromthesedatathatthereisawidespreadbeliefamongmathematicsgraduatesthattheirstudyhasindeedhadthiseffect.

Figure 1: The percentage of participants agreeing that skills/knowledge in Cluster 1 were (a) very/quite important in their career and (b) developed a lot or quite a bit during their course.

Figure 2: Responses to the Smith Report Quote which asserted that studying mathematics is effective at developing ‘generic cognitive skills’.

4.2.2 Cluster 2

Thesecondclusterofknowledge/skills,showninFigure3,wasformedofthoseskillswhichsomeparticipantsperceivedtobeimportantfortheircareers,andwhichwereperceivedbyareasonablenumberofparticipantstohavebeendevelopedduringtheircourse.Thecluster

Page 17: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

1�

includedsomeareasofmathematicalknowledge(calculus,analysisdifferentialequationsetc.),aswellassomegenericskills(researchskills).

Ofparticularinterest,giventheresultspresentedinSection4.3wastheresultfortheskillofapplyingmathematicstotherealworld:around65%ofparticipantsbelievedthatthiswasimportantfortheircareer,andasimilarnumberthoughtithadbeendevelopedduringtheircourse.

Figure 3: The percentage of participants agreeing that skills/knowledge in Cluster 2 were (a) very/quite important in their career and (b) developed a lot or quite a bit during their course.

4.2.3 Cluster 3

Thethirdclusterofknowledge/skills,showninFigure4,consistedofareaswhichwererarelyperceivedtobeimportantforparticipants’careers,butwhichwereperceivedbyareasonablenumberofparticipantstohavebeendevelopedduringtheircourse.

4.2.4 Cluster 4

The final cluster of knowledge/skills, shown in Figure 5, consisted of areas which were widely agreedtobeimportantforparticipants’careers,butwhichwerenotwidelyagreedtohavebeenwelldevelopedduringtheircourses.WhereasCluster1consistedofgenericcognitiveskills(logical thinking etc), Cluster 4 could be classified as consisting of generic non-cognitive skills: oralandwrittencommunication,team-working,makingpresentationsandcomputerliteracy.Alltheseareaswereconsideredbythelargemajorityofmathematicsgraduatestobeimportantfortheircareers,butonlyaminorityofparticipantsbelievedthattheyhadbeendevelopedduringtheirundergraduatestudies.

4.2.5 Workplace versus further study

Wefoundfewinterestingorsurprisingdifferencesinresponsesbetweenthosewhowereinemploymentastheirprimaryactivity,andthosewhowereprimarilyengagedinfurtherstudy.Weassessedthesedifferencesbycomparingresponsestotheuseful/developedquestionsusing(Bonferronicorrected)MannWhitneyUtests.

Results

Page 18: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Graduates’ Views on the Undergraduate Mathematics Curriculum

1�

Figure 4: The percentage of participants agreeing that skills/knowledge in Cluster 3 were (a) very/quite important in their career and (b) developed a lot or quite a bit during their course.

Figure 5: The percentage of participants agreeing that skills/knowledge in Cluster 4 were (a) very/quite important in their career and (b) developed a lot or quite a bit during their course.

Page 19: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

1�

Withrespecttoknowledge/skillsdevelopedduringtheircourses,thoseinemploymentclaimedtohavedevelopedmoreknowledgeaboutmathematicseducationandnumbertheory,butotherwise there were no significant between-groups differences.

Withrespecttotheusefulnessofthevariousskills,thoseinemploymentbelievedthatcomputerliteracyandteam-workingweremoreimportanttothemthanthoseinfurtherstudy.Thereversewas true for: applying mathematics to the real world, thinking in abstract ways about difficult concepts,researchskills,writtencommunication,makingpresentations,independentlearning,andmanyoftheareasofmathematicalknowledge(algebra,calculus,geometry/topology,differential equations, fluid/solid mechanics, mathematical physics, mathematical modelling and mathematicalcomputing).

4.3 Underdeveloped knowledge/skills

We asked participants to select the five of the knowledge/skills given in Table 1 which they wishedtheyhadhadtheopportunitytodevelopfurtherduringtheirdegreestudies.Theresultsofthisquestionareshown,organisedbyCluster,inFigure6.

Figure 6: The percentage of participants selecting each area of knowledge/skill among the “top five” of those that they wished they had had the opportunity to develop more during their degree course, by Cluster.

Perhapsunsurprisingly,theknowledge/skillsinClusters1and3(thosewhicheitherwereperceivedashavingbeenwelldeveloped,orwhichwerenotconsideredimportantforgraduates’careers)werenotoftenpickedbyparticipantswhenrespondingtothisquestion.Incontrast,allthegenericnon-cognitiveskillsinCluster4scoredhighly:inparticular,participants

Results

Page 20: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Graduates’ Views on the Undergraduate Mathematics Curriculum

1�

felt that they would have benefited from the opportunity to develop further their skills of presenting,communicationandteam-working.

Perhapsmoresurprisingwerethescoresoftheknowledge/skillsinCluster2.Inparticular,participantsfeltthattheywouldhavelikedtohavedevelopedtheabilitytoapplymathematicstotherealworldtoagreaterextentthantheydid.Recallthataround65%ofparticipantsfeltthatthisskillswasimportantintheircareerandaround60%feltitwasdevelopedduringtheircourse.

4.4 Teaching and delivery

Recall that we asked participants to reflect on the teaching during their degree course:

If you had had the opportunity to influence how your undergraduate degree had been taught in order to improve the learning outcomes e.g. teaching style, mode of delivery, peer tutoring/mentoring, what would you suggest?

Therewere242responsestothisquestion,withmanyofferingsuggestionsforimprovement.WecarriedoutathematicanalysisoftheirresponseswhichgaverisetotherecurringthemesshowninTable5.

Theme N

Teachingquality 40Teachingstyle 31

Realworldapplicationsofmathematics 19

Peersupport 16

Groupwork 15

Opportunitytolearntransferableskills 12

Coursenotes 10

Various other comments

Table 5: The themes that emerged from an analysis of participants’ free text responses to a question concerning the teaching and delivery of mathematics degrees.

Frequentlytherewerecontradictoryresponses.Forexample,manyparticipantsaskedformorelectures,moretutorials;othersforlesslecturesandlesstutorials.Neverthelessthegeneralmessage was that participants would have liked to have had more in the way of ‘teaching’ than lecturing,moreopportunitiesforproblemsolvingsessionsandmoreopportunitiestodiscussmathematicswiththeirlecturers.Participantsemphasisedtheneedtoseemorerealworldapplicationsofthemathematicstheystudied,partlysothattheywouldbebetterpreparedtousemathematicsintheworkplace.Thedevelopmentofgenericnon-cognitiveskillswasalsoemphasisedasbeingimportantandunderdevelopedinuniversitymathematicseducation.Theissueofteachingqualityattractedalargenumberofsuggestions,thoughthemessagewasvariable:manyreportedupontheexcellentteachingexperiencetheyhadhad,whereasothersclearlyfelttherewasmuchroomforimprovement.

4.4.1 Teaching quality

Therewerefortyresponsesregardingthequalityoftheteachingprovidedatuniversity.Theseweredistinctfromresponsesaboutthestyleofteaching(reportedbelow).Thesecommentsshowedthegreatestamountofvariabilitybothwithinandbetweeninstitutions.Twelveparticipantswerefulsomeintheirpraiseforthequalityoftheteachingthattheyexperienced:

I was taught fantastically and there was always support there if needed

All the teachers were very involved and prepared to help all students after hours

I think the teaching at the university was amazing and I couldn’t think of an area I would change.

The teaching during my degree was excellent.

Page 21: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

1�

Ontheotherhand,24participantswerehighlycriticalofteachingstandards:

[Universities should get] rid of lecturers that are well-known to be bad at lecturing

In my opinion a lot of lecturers I had were good at maths but very poor teachers

Severalparticipantsreferredtotheneedtoimposetrainingrequirementsonteachingstaff:

More rigorous teaching qualifications for lecturers—a large number of lecturers were terrible and a waste of time.

There should be regular departmental assessment of [postgraduate] tutors

Fourothersnotedthevariabilityintheirexperience,forexample:

There is huge variation in the quality of teaching.

Some of the lecturers were really excellent but some were really awful.

Several participants noted that they had experienced foreign lecturers who they found difficult tounderstand.

4.4.2 Teaching style

Asdistinctfromteachingquality,31participantscommenteduponthestyleofuniversityteachingandhowthismightbeimproved.Manyreferredtotheadvantagesofthetraditional“chalkandtalk”methodoverPowerpointdelivery:

The learning comes in seeing concepts evolve through lines of logic—this means a lecture paced at the speed a lecturer can write can work very well.

The teachers should write as much on the board as possible.

The blackboard/whiteboard forces the lecturer to consider what is being written and leads to more valuable insights being shared than in Powerpoint presentations.

Manywroteabouttheneedtomakelecturesmoreinteractiveandengaging.

I felt I was lectured to and not actively taught.

Lectures are a poor (but necessary evil perhaps) method of conveying the material to large groups of students. They don’t cause one to engage with the material

Less mindless copying of notes during lectures.

Make it more interactive. I stopped going to lectures because I got bored by someone just talking at me.

4.4.3 The need for more real world applications

Nineteenresponsesreferredtotheneedtoincorporatemorerealworldapplicationsintoundergraduatecoursesandforteachingstafftohavemoreawarenessofmathematicalapplicationsoutsideoftheuniversityenvironment.Typicalcommentsincluded:

[There should be a] higher emphasis on applying the concepts learnt to problems currently faced in industry

Find lecturers who actually apply mathematics in their jobs, not just sit at uni—their lectures are much more interesting and useful.

My only issue relates to real world experiences as I feel that this is where mathematics students have been let down. There is little if any mention of how to link mathematics to the real world of work.

I would have tried to develop modules where the practicality of mathematics into real world applications would have been more obvious in order to better prepare students for the job market.

Results

Page 22: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Graduates’ Views on the Undergraduate Mathematics Curriculum

�0

4.4.4 Peer support

Therewere16separatereferencestopeersupport.Withoneexception,thesereferredtothepotentialvalueoftheuniversitydevelopingapeersupportscheme:

If the department had been able to match together people from different year groups who had taken similar combinations of modules. . .

Oneparticipantnotedhowimportantitisthattheuniversity“showthat[peersupport]isoffered”.Whilstoneparticipantthoughtaformalsystemwasunnecessary“asyouoftenmakefriendsonyourcourse”,anothernotedthat“perhapsweshouldbeallocatedtostudygroupstoassist those who don’t naturally find friends on the course and end up working alone.”

4.4.5 Group/team work

There were 15 responses regarding the benefits of including more group-based learning, which, forexample,mightprovideopportunitiestopresentproblemsandsolutionstopeers.

[. . . the course could be improved by] a lot more team work.

Oneparticipantnotedthattheemphasisinhisdegreeoncompetitionandworkingalonemeantthat“studentsmissedoutongainingvaluableteamworkingskills.”Anotheradded“Teamworkingisoneofthemostimportantemployabilityaspectsandthereislittletononeofitintheundergraduateprogramme.”

4.4.6 The development of generic skills

The need to develop generic skills—those skills which participants believed to be important in the workplace—received 15 mentions. Many stated that there was insufficient opportunity to develop theseonundergraduatemathematicscoursesbutthattheywereessentialfortheworkplace:

I would strongly advise that students desperately need presentation skills, written and oral communication skills which are generally not obtained during their degrees. While maths students leave with extensive maths skills their skills are hard to transfer in the workplace due to inadequate presentation practice.

[There should be more] speaking in front of groups, presentations, organisational skills, soft skills

I think there is a distinct lack of communication skills taught in a maths degree.

4.4.7 Coursework, assessment and feedback

Thereweretwelvereferencestocoursework,assessmentandfeedbackissues.Mostsuggested that there should be more continuous assessment and less reliance on a final examination.Somesuggestedtheneedformoreinformativefeedback:

Ensure there is a decent balance between continuous assessment and examination.

Continuous assessment would have forced me to study harder all the way along.

Explanations of why an answer was wrong can be extremely useful.

4.4.8 Course notes

Thereweretenreferencestotheprovisionofcoursenoteswithparticipantssuggestingthatafullsetofnotesatthestartishelpful,thatpre-printednotesenablestudentstospendmoretimelisteningandlesstimecopying.

More lecturers to have their notes available for annotation in lectures.

My best lecturer wrote LaTeX notes for his courses which displayed tremendous insight and were inspiring to read.

Oneparticipantsuggestedthatmultiplesourcesofinformationshouldbeavailablewhereassometimestheonlysourceofinformationwasthelecturenotesthemselves.Anothersuggestedthatallnotesshouldbeavailableonlinesothat“thattherearenotgapsinyourlearningifyou

Page 23: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

�1

hadtomisslectures”.Oneparticipantwasatoddswiththerest,suggestingthatprintoutsofthenotesshouldnotbeprovidedinfullatthestartofthemodule.

4.5 Developing undergraduate mathematics degrees

Weaskedforparticipantstooffercommentsthattheythoughtmightbeusefulininformingdevelopmentofundergraduatemathematicsdegrees.182participantsprovidedcomments.WecarriedoutathematicanalysisoftheirresponseswhichgaverisetotherecurringthemesshowninTable6.

Theme N

Genericskills 41Realworldapplicationsofmathematics 34

Modulechoices 33

Useofsoftwarepackagesandprogramming 26

Careersandcareersadvice 13

Various other comments

Table 6: The themes that emerged from an analysis of participants’ free text responses to a question concerning how mathematics degrees could be developed.

4.5.1 Generic skills

Forty one participants referred to the development of generic skills. Those specifically mentionedwereteamworking,oralandwrittenpresentations,timemanagement,presentingworktonon-mathematicians,researchskills,independentstudy,entrepreneurialskills.Theoverwhelmingmajoritythoughtthatthesewereimportantandoughttobedevelopedmoreduringundergraduatestudies:

At [my university] there is an obligation to do a small amount of team working and the occasional presentation, but these skills should be developed FAR more as they will always be needed in the workplace.

On my degree everything was quite abstract—my mathematical understanding has improved by teaching others—having to explain to others by communicating mathematically.

[There should be] more presentations and teamwork—something I struggle with in my current job

Make writing a compulsory component of the degree

Whilst the mathematics taught was interesting, in my experience what was more useful in my degree were the non-maths skills that I learnt

More group work and oral presentations—jobs often look for these skills and I do not have many concrete examples to give.

More opportunities for entrepreneurial development

Ontheotherhand,asmallnumberofparticipantsthoughtthatmathematicalmaterialshouldnotbedisplacedtomakewayforkeyskillsdevelopment:

I wouldn’t want maths degrees to lose any academic rigour in trying to cover more soft skills. The rigour is what has developed my most important skill: problem solving, analytical thinking and the tenacity to keep trying until a solution is found.

Some of the skills [listed in Table 1] are relevant to me now, but it would have been inappropriate to dedicate more time to them during the undergraduate course.

4.5.2 Real world applications

Thirtyfourparticipantsreferredtorealworldapplicationsofmathematics.Theneedtoseesuchapplicationscamethroughverystronglyinparticipants’comments,thoughnotunanimously.

Results

Page 24: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Graduates’ Views on the Undergraduate Mathematics Curriculum

��

Manyparticipantsaskedformorepracticalusesofmathematics,applyingittorealworldissuesandproblems.Someparticipantsreferredtogettingpeopleinfromindustryandtheneedforagreaterexposuretothebusinessandprofessionalapplicationsofmathematics.

[There was] little or no application to the real world—an improvement could be constant relating back to practical problems.

Make more relevant to real world situations.

Incorporate industrial case studies

Butnotallparticipantsagreed:

It is satisfying to learn mathematics for its own sake—don’t try and make it more applied.

For me the most worthwhile aspects of the degree were those modules I took because they interested me. Please include the pure modules that may not seem applicable to most careers.

4.5.3 Module choices

Thirtythreeparticipantsofferedsuggestionsaboutmodules.Themajorityofthesethoughtthatabroaderrangeofmodulesfromwhichtochoosewouldbeanimprovement.Manyreferred to the perceived advantage of being able to take modules in finance and related areas andinstatistics.Somewereclearlydisappointedwiththelackofchoiceandthemoduleson offer. Some found it difficult to know in advance what a particular module would be about andrecommendedmoreworkbedonetoassiststudentsmakingchoices.Asmallnumberremarkedthatlearningaboutthehistoryofmathematicswouldhavebeenvaluable.Somecalledformoreoptionsandothersformorecompulsorymodules.

A wider choice of modules would have been nice.

Keep the variety of modules open so students can choose—you enjoy the work more and get more out of it if you have more control

Make stats compulsory—I chose not to do it and now wish I had.

It would have been nice to study a module that would have helped me directly in my career.

There were not many applied modules—it was largely pure maths but was not advertised that way.

4.5.4 Use of software packages and computer programming

Twentysixparticipantsofferedsuggestionsinrespectoftrainingintheuseofsoftware.Manyemphasisedhowusefulthiswouldbeintheworkplace.Withoneexception,theyaskedformore coverage mentioning particularly Excel, SAS, SPSS, R, C++, Matlab, LaTeX, Fortran, VBA, Java,.Net.Typicalcommentsincluded:

A degree should include essential programming languages

There should be better integration of computing within courses.

I definitely think we should have been taught to use Excel. It sounds simple—it wouldn’t take long to teach, but I realised when I started work how little I knew about it. It is certainly the tool I use most for analysis and I reckon that would be the case for most graduates entering the corporate world.

Teach programming as compulsory throughout

I think it is important to provide students with skills in the most commonly used statistical programmes such as SAS.

4.5.5 Careers advice

Thirteenparticipantsreferredtocareerswithmanyhighlightingtheneedtoofferbettercareersadvice,particularlysothatearlyonintheirundergraduatestudiestheycanstartthinkingaboutwheretheymightwork:

Page 25: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

��

A better understanding of just how mathematicians are employed in as many different fields as possible.

Better industrial links would be nice—I am finding it hard to find employment. . .

More industry links so that undergraduate students have an idea about where they could go after studying. This should happen earlier—we didn’t receive any guidance until 3rd year.

There should be third year options available which are directly related to a maths-related career.

Whilstmostwantedtoseemorelinksbetweentheirdegreeandpotentialcareersthatviewwasnotunanimous:

I think it would be a shame if maths degrees became too career focused. Learning maths for its own sake was the most enjoyable part of my university experience.

I think maths degrees are generally great. I think adapting them to suit future jobs is nonsensical. If people want something more applicable to their jobs they should choose a different degree.

4.6 Comparing graduates with incoming undergraduates

AsdiscussedinSection3,wedesignedthesurveysothatthedatacouldbecomparedwiththatcollectedbytheMoreMathsGrads(MMG)projectintheirsurveyofincomingundergraduatestudents(Challisetal.,2009a,2009b;Robinsonetal.,2009;Thomlinsonetal., 2009). The MMG surveyed 223 first year undergraduate mathematics students from three diverse institutions before they had taken their first class.

OfparticularinterestforourpurposeswasthequestionintheMMGsurveywhichaskedparticipants to reflect on ten of the areas of knowledge/skill listed in Table 1, and to state to whatextenttheyexpectedtodevelopthemduringtheircourse(likeoursurvey,participantsintheMMGstudywereaskedtoselecteither“alot”,“quiteabit”,“notmuch”,or“notatall”).WearegratefultotheMMGteamformakingtheirdataavailabletousforreanalysis.

WecomparedthemedianresponsetotheseshareditemsfromgraduatesandincomingundergraduatesusingMannWhitneyUtests,afterBonferronicorrection.1Threegroupsofskill emerged: (1) those where there was no significant difference between how well incoming undergraduatesexpectedtodeveloptheskillduringtheircourseandhowwellgraduatesbelievedtheyhaddevelopedit,(2)thosewheretheincomingundergraduatesexpectedtodeveloptheskillmorethanthegraduatesbelievedtheyhad,and(3)oneskillwhichgraduatesbelievedtheyhaddevelopedtoagreaterextentthanincomingundergraduatesexpectedto.Asonlyoneskill(writtencommunication)fellintoGroup3,inthediscussionthatfollowswehavecombineditwiththoseinGroup1.

4.6.1 Group 1

The skills in Group 1—those where the retrospective beliefs of graduates were similar to the predictions of incoming graduates—are shown in Figure 7. Three of the four skills in this groupwerethetraditionalgenericcognitiveskillsfromCluster1(seeSection4.2).Theother,writtencommunication,wastheonlyskillwhichgraduatesbelievedtheydevelopedtoagreaterextentthanincomingundergraduatesbelievedtheywould.

4.6.2 Group 2

TheskillsinGroup2,showninFigure8,representamismatchbetweenundergraduates’expectations,andgraduates’experiences.Theyincludedmanyofthegenericnon-cognitiveskillsfromCluster4(seeSection4.2):timemanagement,researchskills,oralcommunication,computerliteracyandmakingpresentations.Ineachofthesecases,incomingundergraduatesexpectedtodeveloptheskilltoagreaterdegreethangraduatesfelttheyhad.

Results

1Whencomparingthesedataitshouldbeborninmindthatthesamplingmethodinthetwosurveyswasratherdifferent:whereasweusedanonlinesurveyacrossaverylargenumberofuniversities,theMMGteamusedapen-and-paperquestionnaireinthreeuniversities.Nevertheless,webelievethatcomparingthesedatadoesyieldsomeusefulinsights.

Page 26: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Graduates’ Views on the Undergraduate Mathematics Curriculum

��

TheotherskillinGroup2concernedtheapplicationofmathematicstotherealworld.Over90% of incoming undergraduates expected to develop this skill ‘a lot’ or ‘quite a bit’ during theirstudies,whereasonly62%ofgraduatesfeltthattheyhad.Recallthatthiswastheskillmostoftenselectedwhengraduateswereaskedtoselectthosetheywishtheyhadhadtheopportunitytodevelopmore(seeSection4.3).

Figure 7: The percentage of (a) incoming undergraduates and (b) graduates stating that skills in Group 1 would be or were developed ‘a lot’ or ‘quite a bit’ during their mathematical study.

Figure 8: The percentage of (a) incoming undergraduates and (b) graduates stating that skills in Group 2 would be or were developed ‘a lot’ or ‘quite a bit’ during their mathematical study.

Page 27: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

��

Results

Page 28: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Graduates’ Views on the Undergraduate Mathematics Curriculum

��

Page 29: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

��

5. Discussion

Wesurveyed428mathematicsgraduatesfromthe2008/9graduatingcohort.Weaskedparticipants to reflect on the knowledge/skills they acquired during their degree course, and the knowledge/skills they found useful during their careers. In this discussion we highlight three firm messagesofthesedata,relatedto(i)genericcognitiveskills;(ii)genericnon-cognitiveskills;and(iii)applicablemathematics.

5.1 Generic cognitive skills

TheEnglishphilosopherJohnLockeonceassertedthat

[Mathematics] should be taught to all those who have time and opportunity, not so much to make them mathematicians as to make them reasonable creatures (Locke, 1706/1971, p.20)

This belief—that mathematics should be studied because it develops the generic cognitive skills of logical reasoning, critical thinking and problem solving—is known to educational psychologistsastheTheoryofFormalDiscipline.Whilethistheoryiscontroversialinthepsychologicalcommunity(forareview,seeNisbettetal.,1987),wefoundthatmathematicsgraduatesstronglyendorseit:overwhelmingmajoritiesofourparticipantsbelievedthatstudyingundergraduatemathematicsdevelopedtheirgenericcognitiveskills(thoseinCluster1).Furthermore,ourparticipantsoverwhelminglybelievedthatsuchskillsareusefulintheircareers.

5.2 Generic non-cognitive skills

Incontrasttogenericcognitiveskills,wefoundthatfewparticipantsbelievedthattheirundergraduatestudyhaddevelopedgenericnon-cognitiveskills:thoseofmakingpresentations,oralandwrittencommunication,teamworkingandcomputerliteracy.Alltheseskillswerewidelyseenbyourparticipantsasbeingofsubstantialimportanceintheworkplace,butwerenotwidelyseenashavingbeendevelopedduringmathematicalstudy.Ourresultsarethus consistent with the findings of Wood’s (2010) interview study.

Is this finding a cause for concern for the mathematical community? It is clear that many participantswishedthattheyhadhadtheopportunitytodeveloptheirgenericnon-cognitiveskillsmoreintheirdegreecourse(inparticular,oralcommunicationandmakingpresentationsscored strongly on this measure), and that they believe that this would have benefited their career.Consequentlyitmightbeworthwhiletoconsiderhowthesegenericnon-cognitiveskillscouldbebettercateredforwithinexistingdegreeprogrammes.However,onemightchallengethissuggestionbyasserting,assomeofourparticipantsdid,thatthegoalofamathematicsdegreeshouldnotbeadaptedtosuitfuturejobs.Thispositioniswellillustratedbythisremarkfromoneofourparticipants:

I think adapting [mathematics degrees] to suit future jobs is nonsensical. If people want something more applicable to their jobs they should choose a different degree.

Indeed,onecouldarguethatincreasingthefocusongenericnon-cognitiveskills,mightinevitablyreducethefocusongenericcognitiveskills,andthereforebeundesirable.

Aproblemforcolleagueswhomightwishtoarguethatthefocusongenericnon-cognitiveskillsshouldnotbeincreasedinthemathematicscurriculumcomesfromouranalysisofthedifferencesbetweentheexpectationsofincomingundergraduates,andtheretrospectiveopinionsofgraduates.Inparticular,thereweresubstantiallymoreincomingundergraduateswhoexpectedtodevelopgenericnon-cognitiveskills,thangraduateswhobelievedthattheydid(seeFigure8).Thus,ifmathematicsdegreesaretocontinuebeingstructuredinawaythatdoesnotprioritisethedevelopmentofgenericnon-cognitiveskills(perhapsforperfectlyvalidreasons),wesuggestthatthisfocusneedstobebetterexplainedtoincomingundergraduates.Indeed,glancingthrough

Discussion

Page 30: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Graduates’ Views on the Undergraduate Mathematics Curriculum

��

undergraduateprospectusesindicatesthatmanydepartmentsexplicitlydothereverse,andclaimthattheirstudentsdodeveloppresentationandcommunicationskills(inaninformalanalysisofundergraduateprospectusentriesformathematicswefoundthat11ofoursampleof25prospectusesexplicitlymentionedoralpresentations).

5.3 Applying mathematics to the real world

Whenaskedtoselectwhichareaofknowledgeorskilltheywishedtheyhadhadtheopportunitytodevelopmoreduringtheirmathematicalstudies,overathirdofparticipantsselected“applyingmathematicstotherealworld”.Thisviewwasalsostronglyexpressedinthefreetextresponsesleftbyparticipants.

Learninghowtoapplymathematicsappearstobeanotherareawherethereisasubstantialmismatchbetweenincomingstudents’expectationsandgraduates’experiences:over90%ofincomingundergraduatesexpectedtodevelopthisskill,whereasonly62%ofgraduatesfeltthattheyhad.Again,thismismatchinexpectationsandexperiencesmayberelatedtohowmathematicsdegreesareadvertised:inourinformalsurvey,20ofthe26prospectusentriesexplicitlymentionedhowstudentswouldlearnhowtoapplymathematicstorealworldproblems.

Page 31: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

��

Discussion

Page 32: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Graduates’ Views on the Undergraduate Mathematics Curriculum

�0

Page 33: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

�1

6. Conclusion

Wesurveyedtheviewsof428mathematicsgraduatesfromthe2008/9graduatingcohort,and asked them to reflect on the knowledge/skills they believed they developed during their mathematicalstudy,andhowusefulorotherwisesuchknowledge/skillshavebeenduringtheirsubsequentcareer.

Wefoundamixedpicture.Ontheonehand,mathematicsdegreesareperceivedasbeingextremelysuccessfulatdevelopingveryusefulgenericcognitiveskills,suchaslogicalthinking,abstractthinkingandproblemsolving.However,thereareaseriesofgenericnon-cognitiveskills—oral and written communication, presentations, and team-working—which incoming undergraduatesexpecttodevelopbystudyingmathematics,whichgraduatesbelievewouldbeusefulintheircareers,butwhichgraduatesdonotbelieveweresuccessfullydevelopedduringtheirstudies.

Conclusion

Page 34: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Graduates’ Views on the Undergraduate Mathematics Curriculum

��

Page 35: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

��

References

[1] Challis,N.,Robinson,M.,&Thomlinson,M.(2009a).“Employability”skillsinmathematicalcourses.MSOR Connections,9,38-41.

[2] Challis, N., Robinson, M., & Thomlinson, M. (2009b). More Maths Grads project—the HE Curriculumtheme.MSOR Connections,9,34-40.

[3] Hanson,S.,&Overton,T.(2010a).Skills required by new chemistry graduates and their development in degree programmes.Hull:HigherEducationAcademyUKPhysicalSciencesCentre.

[4] Hanson,S.,&Overton,T.(2010b).Skills required by new physics graduates and their development in degree programmes.Hull:HigherEducationAcademyUKPhysicalSciencesCentre.

[5] Hoyles,C.,Noss,R.,&Pozzi,S.(2001).Proportionalreasoninginnursingpractice.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,4-27.

[6] Huckstep, P. (2000). Mathematics as a vehicle for ‘mental training’. InS.Bramall&J.White(Eds.),Why learn maths?(p.85-100).London:InstituteofEducation,UniversityofLondon.

[9] Huckstep,P.(2007).Elevateorrelegate?Therelativeimportanceofmathematics.Cambridge Journal of Education,37,427-439.

[10]Inglis,M.,&Simpson,A.(2009).Conditionalinferenceandadvancedmathematicalstudy:Furtherevidence.Educational Studies in Mathematics,72,185-198.

[11]Lehman,D.R.,&Nisbett,R.E.(1990).Alongitudinalstudyoftheeffectsofundergraduatetrainingonreasoning.Developmental Psychology,26,952-960.

[12]Locke,J.(1706/1971).Conduct of the understanding.NewYork:BurtFranklin.

[13]Nisbett,R.E.,Fong,G.T.,Lehman,D.R.,&Cheng,P.W.(1987).Teachingreasoning.Science,238,625-631.

[14]Noss,R.,&Hoyles,C.(1996).Thevisibilityofmeanings:Modellingthemathematicsofbanking.International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning,1,3-31.

[15] QAA. (2007). Mathematics, statistics and operational research subject benchmark standards.Onlinearticle[accessed29/03/2012]:http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Documents/Maths07.pdf.

[16]Robinson,M.,Thomlinson,M.,&Challis,N.(2009).Small-groupteaching.MSORConnections,9,26-30.

[17]Smith,A.(2004).Making mathematics count: The report of Professor Adrian Smith’s inquiry into post-14 mathematics education. London: The Stationery Office.

[18]Smith,J.P.,III.(1999).Trackingthemathematicsofautomobileproduction:Areschoolsfailingtopreparestudentsforwork?American Educational Research Journal,36,835-878.

[19]Thomlinson,M.,Challis,N.,&Robinson,M.(2009).Studentexperiencesofthetransitiontouniversity.MSOR Connections,9,48-51.

[20]Thorndike,E.L.(1924).Mentaldisciplineinhighschoolstudies.Journal of Educational Psychology,15,1-22.

[21]Wood,L.N.(2010).Graduatecapabilities:puttingmathematicsintocontext.International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology,41,189-198.

References

Page 36: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Graduates’ Views on the Undergraduate Mathematics Curriculum

��

Page 37: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

��

Good Practice on Inclusive Curricula in the Mathematical Sciences

Page 38: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Graduates’ Views on the Undergraduate Mathematics Curriculum

��

Page 39: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University
Page 40: Mathematical Sciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project · Mathematics Curriculum Matthew Inglis, Tony Croft & Janette Matthews Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University

Over400mathematicsgraduatesweresurveyed2.5 years after graduation. They were asked toreflect on the knowledge and skills they believed that they developed during their mathematicalstudy,andtoassesshowusefultheseskillshavebeen during their career to date. These datawere benchmarked against an earlier survey ofincoming undergraduates’ expectations. Thisaimedtodeterminewhetherthehighereducationmathematics syllabus adequately preparesstudents for theworkplace.This reportprovidescontext, describes and discusses the findings of thisresearch.

This work was supported by the MathematicalSciences HE Curriculum Innovation Project,operated by the Maths, Stats and OR (MSOR)Network as part of the Mathematical SciencesStrandoftheNationalHESTEMProgramme.Findoutmoreatwww.mathstore.ac.uk/hestem