mathematical modeling of natural and anthropogenic change of regional climate and environment

Download Mathematical modeling of natural and anthropogenic change of regional climate and environment

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: talasi

Post on 10-Jan-2016

23 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

International Conference on Environmental Observations, Modeling and Information Systems ENVIROMIS-2004 17-25 July 2004, Tomsk, Russia. Mathematical modeling of natural and anthropogenic change of regional climate and environment V.N. Lykosov - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

  • International Conference on Environmental Observations, Modeling and Information Systems ENVIROMIS-200417-25 July 2004, Tomsk, Russia

    Mathematical modeling of natural and anthropogenic change of regional climate and environment V.N. Lykosov Russian Academy of Sciences Institute for Numerical Mathematics, Moscow E-mail: [email protected]

  • Climate System

    1. ATMOSPHERE the gas envelope of the Earth (oxygen, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, water vapor, ozone, etc.), which controls the solar radiation transport from space towards the Earth surface.

    2. OCEAN the major water reservoir in the system, containing salted waters of the World ocean and its seas and absorbing the basic part of the incoming solar radiation (a powerful accumulator of energy).

    3. LAND surface of continents with hydrological system (inland waters, wetlands and rivers), soil (e.g. with groundwater) and cryolithozone (permafrost).

    4. CRYOSPHERE continental and see ice, snow cover and mountain glaciers.

    5. BIOTA vegetation on the land and ocean, alive organisms in the air, water and soil, mankind.

  • The Climate System(T. Slingo, 2002)

  • 3

    -1.2

    -1.17

    -1.12

    -1.2

    -1.09

    -0.78

    -0.87

    -0.98

    -1.17

    -1.13

    -1.13

    -1.08

    -1.2

    -1.2

    -1.38

    -1.39

    -1.08

    -1.2

    -1.42

    -1.46

    -1.68

    -1.48

    -1.68

    -2.02

    -2.07

    -2.02

    -2.46

    -2.38

    -2.29

    -2.23

    -2.25

    -2.32

    -2.16

    -1.94

    -1.83

    -1.61

    -1.37

    -1.22

    -1.2

    -1.28

    -1.29

    -1.28

    -1.04

    -0.87

    -0.85

    -0.91

    -1.01

    -1.1

    -1

    -0.63

    -0.57

    -0.6

    -0.87

    -0.99

    Decades

    C degrees

    Annually mean air temperature in Khanty-Mansiisk for the time period from 1937 to 1999 (Khanty-Mansiisk Hydrometeocenter).

    1

    193719381939194019411942194319441945194619471948194919501951195219531954195519561957195819591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002

    3.7-1.5-0.3-8.2-3.8-2.5-3.35.8-0.72.40.52.49-8.80.34.42-0.26.70.3-0.43.83.1-3.36.9-1.5-3.7-1.20.2-0.6-2.1-10.2-4.91.8-11-5.9-5.133.6-4.83.9-4.1-2.66.2-2.45.46.6-0.51.2-33.9-3.3-4.93-0.76.747.1-1.4-6.92.1-1.2-1.2-4.33.9

    19371936193719381939194019411942194319441945194619471948194919501951195219531954195519561957195819591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002

    -1.5-3.42.12.70.7-2-41.43.9-1.9-0.51.6-0.20.83.93.2-2.9-0.61.3-2.72.1-5.5-52.42.5-5.5-5.64.6-1.55.75.6-2.53.6-1.4-31.92.14.2-0.21.31.92.1-0.5-0.9-4.73.15.33.64.32.15.97.83.5-4.71.32.83.45.83.25.73.4-5.562.14.4

    1937-461938-471939-481940-491941-501942-511943-521944-531945-541946-551947-561948-571949-581950-591951-601952-611953-621954-631955-641956-651957-661958-661959-681960-691961-701962-711963-721964-731965-741966-751967-761968-771969-781970-791971-801972-811973-821974-831975-841976-851977-861978-871979-881980-891981-901982-911983-921984-931985-941986-951987-961988-971989-981990-99

    189191192192193195193192191191190188188188186186189188187186189188186185187183184183184183183182182182184183188189188188192193191191190190188186187190189190190190

    1937-461938-471939-481940-491941-501942-511943-521944-531945-541946-551947-561948-571949-581950-591951-601952-611953-621954-631955-641956-651957-661958-661959-681960-691961-701962-711963-721964-731965-741966-751967-761968-771969-781970-791971-801972-811973-821974-831975-841976-851977-861978-871979-881980-891981-901982-911983-921984-931985-941986-951987-961988-971989-981990-99

    -1.2-1.17-1.12-1.2-1.09-0.78-0.87-0.98-1.17-1.13-1.13-1.08-1.2-1.2-1.38-1.39-1.08-1.2-1.42-1.46-1.68-1.48-1.68-2.02-2.07-2.02-2.46-2.38-2.29-2.23-2.25-2.32-2.16-1.94-1.83-1.61-1.37-1.22-1.2-1.28-1.29-1.28-1.04-0.87-0.85-0.91-1.01-1.1-1-0.63-0.57-0.6-0.87-0.99

    1

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    1936-2002 ( -10,8)

    2

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    3

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

  • 1

    3.912.810.46.4

    7.812.310.46.4

    6.711.310.46.4

    7.211.910.46.4

    3.711.710.46.4

    3.77.510.46.4

    7.811.810.46.4

    14.521.710.46.4

    16.323.210.46.4

    17.221.810.46.4

    6.712.810.46.4

    10.719.110.46.4

    14.620.510.46.4

    9.817.710.46.4

    5.4910.46.4

    8.714.910.46.4

    13.620.210.46.4

    4.123.810.46.4

    9.622.110.46.4

    8.613.110.46.4

    10.615.810.46.4

    13.220.710.46.4

    18.724.310.46.4

    16.320.210.46.4

    11.815.610.46.4

    7.814.610.46.4

    5.110.710.46.4

    13.921.910.46.4

    15.620.710.46.4

    9.414.310.46.4

    5.911.310.46.4

    C degrees

    Air temperature. May 2003 (Khanty-Mansiisk Hydrometeocenter)

    2

    0.4

    3.9

    6.3

    5.4

    2.2

    0

    0

    7.3

    0

    0

    4.3

    1.2

    4.9

    27.9

    64 . 47

    (). 2003.

    1

    2003.

    -

    13.912.810.40-6.36.400

    27.812.310.401.86.4000.4

    36.711.310.4036.4003.9

    47.211.910.4046.4006.3

    53.711.710.402.36.4005.4

    63.77.510.401.46.4002.2

    77.811.810.402.56.400

    814.521.710.406.96.400

    916.323.210.4011.76.400

    1017.221.810.4012.86.4000

    116.712.810.4036.4000

    1210.719.110.401.56.400

    1314.620.510.407.46.400

    149.817.710.406.56.4007.3

    155.4910.402.16.400

    168.714.910.402.26.4000

    1713.620.210.405.86.400

    184.123.810.408.96.400

    199.622.110.4014.56.400

    208.613.110.4036.4000

    2110.615.810.403.36.400

    2213.220.710.403.66.400

    2318.724.310.4013.86.400

    2416.320.210.4013.96.4004.3

    2511.815.610.407.16.4001.2

    267.814.610.404.66.4004.9

    275.110.710.4016.400

    2813.921.910.406.96.400

    2915.620.710.4010.16.400

    309.414.310.4066.400

    315.911.310.4036.40027.9

    509.3168.363.8

  • Features of the climate system as physical object-IBasic components of the climate system atmosphere and ocean are thin films with the ratio of vertical scale to horizontal scale about 0.01-0.001.

    On global and also regional spatial scales, the system can be considered as quasi-twodimensional one. However, its density vertical stratification is very important for correct description of energy cycle. Characteristic time scales of energetically important physical processes cover the interval from 1 second (turbulence) to tens and hundreds years (climate and environment variability).

    Laboratory modelling of such system is very difficult.

  • Features of the climate system as physical object-II

    It is practically impossible to carry out specialized physical experiments with the climate system. For example, we have no possibility to pump the atmosphere by the carbon dioxide and, keeping other conditions, to measure the system response. We have shirtterm series of observational data for some of components of the climate system.

    Conclusion: the basic (but not single) tool to study the climate system dynamics is mathematical (numerical) modeling.

    Hydrodynamical climate models are based on global models of the atmosphere and ocean circulation.

  • Objectives of climate modelingTo reproduce both climatology (seasonal and monthly means) and statistics of variability: intra-seasonal (monsoon cycle, characteristics of storm-tracks, etc.) and climatic (dominated modes of inter-annual variability such as El-Nino phenomenon or Arctic Oscillation)

    To estimate climate change due to anthropogenic activity

    To reproduce with high degree of details regional climate: features of hydrological cycle, extreme events, impact of global climate change on regional climate, environment and socio-economic relationships

    Fundamental question (V.P. Dymnikov): what climatic parameters and in what accuracy must by reproduced by a mathematical model of the climate system to make its sensitivity to small perturbations of external forcing close to the sensitivity of the actual climate system?

  • Computational technologies

    Global climate model (e.g. model with improved spatial resolution in the region under consideration) implemented on computational system of parallel architecture (CSPA)

    Methods of regionalization: 1) statistical approach (downscaling);

    2) hydrodynamical mesoscale simulation ( e.g., mesoscale model 5) requires CSPA; 3) large-eddy simulation of geophysical boundary layers (requires CSPA)

    Assessment of global climate change and technological impact on regional environment

  • Observational data to verify models1) ECMWF reanalysis ERA-15 (1979-1993 ..), ERA-40 (1957-2001) http://www.ecmwf.int/research/era

    2) NCEP/NCAR (National Center of Environment Protection/National Center of Atmospheric Research, USA), 1958-1997, http://wesley.wwb.noaa.gov/reanalysis.htm

    3) Precipitation from 1979 to present time http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/globalprecip 4) Archive NDP048, containing multiyear data of routine observations on 225 meteorological stations of the former USSR http://cdiac.esd.oml.gov/ftp/ndp048 Numerical experiments with modern global climate models produce a large amount of data (up to 1Gb for 1 month). This requires special efforts for its visualization, postprocessing and analysis.

  • Large-scale hydrothermodynamics of the atmosphere Subgrid-scaleprocessesparameterization

    ,

    ,

    ,

    ,

    ,

    where

    .

    _1119850510.unknown

    _1119850544.unknown

    _1120137379.unknown

    _1120137402.unknown

    _1119850556.unknown

    _1119850536.unknown

    _1119850482.unknown

  • Parameterization of subgrid-scale processes Turbulence in the atmospheric boundary layer, upper ocean layer and bottom boundary layer Convection and orographic waves

    Diabatic heat sources (radiative and phase changes, cloudiness, precipitation, etc.)

    Carbon dioxide cycle and photochemical transformations Heat, moisture and solute transport in the vegetation and snow cover Production and transport of the soil methane

    Etc.

  • T.J. Philips et al. (2002). Large-Scale Validation of AMIP II Land-Surface Simulations

  • Table 2. Model codes and features of the sixteen AMIP2 models analysed in Zhang et al. (2002)

    Code

    Resolution

    Land-surface components

    No. of layers in soil temp. calculations

    No. of layers in soil moist. calculations

    Model

    Country

    Soil model complexity

    Canopy representation

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    H

    I

    J

    K

    L

    M

    N

    O

    P

    T42L18

    T63L45

    4x5 L21

    T159L50

    T63L30

    T42L18

    T62L18

    T42L18

    3.75x2.5 L58

    3.75x2.5 L19

    T47L32

    4x5 L20

    T42L30

    T42L18

    4x5 L24

    4x5 L15

    bucket

    force-restore

    multi-layer diffusion

    multi-layer diffusion

    multi-layer diffusion

    multi-layer diffusion

    multi-layer diffusion

    multi-layer diffusion

    multi-layer diffusion

    multi-layer diffusion

    multi-layer diffusion

    multi-layer diffusion

    multi-layer diffusion

    multi-layer diffusion

    bucket

    bucket

    const. canopy resistance

    intercept. + transpiration

    intercept. + transpiration

    intercept. + transpiration

    intercept. + transpiration

    intercept.+transpiration+CO2

    intercept. + transpiration

    intercept. + transpiration

    intercept.+transpiration+CO2

    intercept.+transpiration+CO2

    intercept. + transpiration

    intercept. + transpiration

    intercept. + transpiration

    intercept.+transpiration+CO2

    no

    no

    3

    2

    24

    4

    4

    6

    3

    2

    4

    4

    3

    2

    3

    6

    1

    1

    1

    2

    24

    4

    3

    6

    2

    3

    4

    4

    3

    3

    3

    6

    1

    1

    CCSR, Japan

    CNRM, France

    INM, Russia

    ECMWF, UK

    JMA, Japan

    NCAR, USA

    NCEP, USA

    PNNL, USA

    UGAMP, UK

    UKMO, UK

    CCCMA, Can

    GLA, USA

    MRI, Japan

    SUNYA, USA

    UIUC, USA

    YONU, Korea

    PAGE

    35

  • The Taylor diagram for the variability of the latent heat flux at the land surface as follows from results of AMIP-II experiments (Irannejad et al., 2002).

  • Sensitivity of the climate system to small perturbations of external forcing

    (invited lecture at the World Climate Conference, Moscow, 29 September 3 October, 2003)

    V.P. Dymnikov, E.M. Volodin, V.Ya. Galin, A.S. Gritsoun, A.V. Glazunov, N.A. Diansky, V.N. LykosovInstitute of Numerical Mathematics RAS, Moscow

  • INM coupled atmosphere - ocean general circulation model

    AGCM

    - Finite difference model with spatial resolution 5x4 and 21 levels in sigma-coordinates from the surface up to 10 hPa.

    - In radiation absorption of water vapour, clouds, CO2, O3, CH4, N2O, O2 and aerosol are taken into account. Solar spectrum is divided by 18 intervals, while infrared spectrum is divided by 10 intervals.

    - Deep convection, orographic and non-orographic gravity wave drag are considered in the model. Soil and vegetation processes are taken into account.

    ||

    Non-flux-adjusted coupling

    ||

    OGCM

    -The model is based on the primitive equations of the ocean dynamics in spherical sigma-coordinate system. It uses the splitting-up method in physical processes and spatial coordinates. Model horizontal resolution is 2.5x2, it has 33 unequal levels in the vertical with an exponential distribution.

  • The climate model sensitivity to the increasing of CO2

    CMIP - Coupled Model Intercomparison Projecthttp://www-pcmdi.llnl.gov/cmipCMIP collects output from global coupled ocean-atmosphere general circulation models (about 30 coupled GCMs). Among other usage, such models are employed both to detect anthropogenic effects in the climate record of the past century and to project future climatic changes due to human production of greenhouse gases and aerosols.

  • Response to the increasing of CO2CMIP models (averaged)INM model

  • Global warming in CMIP models in CO2 run and parameterization of lower inversion clouds

    T - global warming (K), LC - parameterization of lower inversion clouds (+ parameterization was included, - no parameterization, ? - model description is not available). Models are ordered by reduction of global warming.

    Model

    T

    LC

    NCAR-WM

    3.77

    ?

    GFDL

    2.06

    -

    LMD

    1.97

    -

    CCC

    1.93

    -

    UKM03

    1.86

    -

    CERF

    1.83

    -

    CCSR

    1.75

    -

    CSIRO

    1.73

    +

    GISS

    1.70

    -

    UKMO

    1.59

    -

    BMRC

    1.54

    +

    ECHAM3

    1.54

    -

    MRI

    1.50

    -

    IAP

    1.48

    +

    NCAR-CSM

    1.26

    +

    PCM

    1.14

    +

    INM

    0.99

    +

    NRL

    0.75

    +

  • Mesoscale non-hydrostatic modelingMM5 - Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Modeling System http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/mm5Program code: Fortran77, Fortran90, C. Hybrid parallelization (shared and distributed memory) + vectorizationDocumentationImplemented by V. Gloukhov (SRCC/MSU) on MVS-1000M

  • International Conference on Computational Mathematics ICCM-2004, 21-25 June, 2004, Novosibirsk, Russia

    Large-Eddy Simulation of Geophysical Boundary Layers on Parallel Computational Systems V.N. Lykosov, A.V. Glazunov Russian Academy of Sciences Institute for Numerical Mathematics, Moscow E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]

  • Geophysical Boundary Layers (GBLs) as elements of the Earth climate systemAtmospheric Boundary Layer HABL ~ 102 - 103 mOceanic Upper Layer HUOL ~ 101 - 102 mOceanic Bottom Layer HOBL ~ 100 - 101 m

    GBL processes control:

    1) transformation of the solar radiation energy at the atmosphere-Earth interface into energy of atmospheric and oceanic motions

    2) dissipation of the whole Earth climate system kinetic energy

    3) heat- and moisture transport between atmosphere and soil (e.g. permafrost), sea and underlying ground (e.g. frozen one).

  • Dynamic structure of GBLs

    Three types of motion:

    totally organized mean flowcoherent semi-organized structures (large eddies and waves)chaotic three-dimensional turbulence

  • Turbulence in PBLs

    Rough surface Large scales Stratification

  • Inertial range Dissipation range Energy range Synoptical variationsBoundary-Layer flows

  • Differential formulation of models

    Models are based on Reynolds type equations obtained after spatial averaging of Navier-Stokes equations and added by equations of heat and moisture (or salt):

  • Turbulent ClosureEquation for turbulent kinetic energy (of subgrid-scale motions): Equation for turbulent kinetic energy dissipation:Constraint on maximal value of sub-grid turbulence length scale:

  • Finite-difference approximation on C grid

    Explicit time scheme of predictor-corrector type (Matsuno scheme)

    Numerical scheme

  • Calculation of tendenciesdiffusionCoriolis forcegravityadvection

    pressure gradientdiffusionadvectiondiffusionadvectionBoundary conditionsVelocity components

    Calculation of eddy viscosity and diffusioncoefficientsSumming up of tendencies, dissipationTemperature, moisture, salinitySolver for the Poisson equationCalculation of the Poisson equation R.H.S., dissipationproduction, dissipation, non-linear terms velocity componentstemperature, moisture, salinity

    , dissipation

  • Parallel version of models is developed to be mainly used on supercomputers with distributed memoryProcesor-to-processor data exchange is realized with the use of MPI standard non-blocked functions of the data transfer-receive 3-D decomposition of computational domain on each time step, processes are co-exchanged only by data which belongs to boundary grid cells of decomposition domains The Random Access Memory (operative memory) is dynamically distributed between processors (the features of FORTRAN-90 are used) Debuging and testing of parallel versions of models is executed on supercomputer MVS1000- of Joint Supercomputer Center (768 processors, peak productivity - 1Tflops)

    PARALLEL IMPLEMENTATION

  • Extreme case:

    Domain 768 x 768 x 256 (= 150 994994) grid points

    574 processors

    3D decomposition (12 x 12x 4)

    MGD Poisson solver

    15 Gbytes of memory

    1 step of scheme ~ 20 s of computer time.

    EMBED MSGraph.Chart.8 \s

    _1113840107.xls

  • Spectra of kinetic energy calculated using results of large-eddy simulation of the convective upper oceanic layer under different spatial resolution (m3)

  • von Karman votrex street behind a round cylinder, Re =200: top - from . (1986). , bottom - model results

  • Turbulent flow between buildingsWind 2.24 /s

  • Lagrangian transport of fine-dispersive particle tracer

    Large number of particles in turbulent flow generated by the LES-model of the atmospheric boundary layer.

    The calculation of trajectories is carried out simultaneously with numerical integration of the hydrodynamic part of the model.

    It is assumed that each of particles has non-zero mass and size. It is possible to sort particles in few groups

    accordingly to their size and density.

    The code of tracer transport is parallelized with the use of MPI. The data exchange between processors is realized with the help of non-blocking transfers and takes place on the background of basic calculations.

    Using results of calculations, the spatial distribution of the particle tracer concentration is calculated for each time step.

    On parallel computational system this algorithm allows to simultaneously calculate trajectories of tens millions particles. The time which is needed to calculate the particles transport is significantly less then the time of the ABL model integration.

    Equation of the particle motion in the air flow:

    where xi (i=1,2,3) particle coordinates, m mass of particle, f drag force.

    To calculate f , the Stokes formula is used:

    r , , V , .

    EMBED Equation.3

    EMBED Equation.3

    _1143542808.unknown

    _1148897591.unknown

  • An example of the particle transport by the turbulent flow between buildings Wind Particle concentrationParticles are ejecting near the surface (along the dotted line). The maximal number of particles is about 10 000 000.

  • SnowUpper iceWaterGroundLower iceUH,LEEsEaSThermodynamics of shallow Reservoir (Stepanenko & Lykosov, 2003, 2004)

    1) One-dimensional approximation.

    2) On the upper boundary: fluxes of momentum, sensible and latent heat, solar and long-wave radiation are calculated On the lower boundary: fluxes are prescribed

    3) Water and ice: heat transport Snow and ground: heat- and moisture transport

    U wind velocityH sensible heat fluxLE latent heat fluxS shirt-wave radiationEa incoming long-wave radiation Es outgoing long-wave radiation

  • Mathematical formulation

    - for water and ice:

    , - heat conductivity - for snow:

    - temperature

    - liquid water

    - for ground:

    - temperature

    - liquid water

    - ice

  • Kolpashevo

  • Simulated snow surface temperature versus measured one on meteorologicalstation Kolpashevo (1961)Quality of snow surface temperature reproduction is an indicator of quality of heat transfer parameterization in the atmospheric surface layer snow system.

    Accuracy of temperature measurementson meteorological station is about 0.5 .

  • Syrdakh Lake

  • Ground temperature under Syrdakh Lake (modeling results)

    As follows from results of numerical experiments, the talik is stably existing during all of integration time (20 years, 1965-1984). Its depth varies from 1.2 to 2 meters under the lake bottom.

  • THANK YOU for YOUR ATTENTION