materiality - part 1
DESCRIPTION
First Semester of Materiality coursework.TRANSCRIPT
MATERALITY Architectural Design Department
Kallis, George
Fall2010
Departing from our closest environment and analyzing
the way we deal with it, the materiality class will
focus on the processes that emerge from, and mediate
between human-nature relationships. The class
emphasizes the artificial processes that become
autonomous self-regenerating mechanisms capable of
extending its contextual influence in the environment
throughout time. In order to evaluate those processes,
the acknowledgement of the local specificities and
resources in the overall action becomes paramount. In
so doing, we expect to develop a strategy of symbiotic
coexistence between human activities and natural
environment. The seminar depicts matter as a transitive
agent that both reshapes and builds the environment,
understanding the act of constructing (and its
corollary, emptying) as the inevitable result of human
habitation. Students will be prompted to adopt a
strategy —based on their knowledge and previous
experience—, that will be instrumental to interpret the
act of design using different materials.
Environment
Geometry
Matter
Technique
Activity and Use
Form
(SURVEY) can boixeres, example, 22@
AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART01:ANALYSIS__GEORGE KALLISBIArch
T o : 2 2 @ b c n . c o m
R e : m a t e r i a l i t yThere's just so much going on.
A leap to the future one might say.
Hi-tech? Frightening? Trendy? It
might as well be. Walking past all these
new forms, watching at a variety of
experimentations with structure, materials,
construction methods… one keeps wondering
“what does this new place being born in the last few years wants to
show?” I guess it is the highly-accelerated evolution of digital
technology, translated into space, trying to fit in a rather
uncomfortable matrix deriving from a different era. An era which, just a couple of
kilometres to the west, has on its own been another symbol: that of the modern
industrial city. The grid: a powerful tool in the hands of the modern urbanist. Much more public
interaction I would say. Mostly ground floor with some pleasant exceptions here and there. A collage
of 20th century facades and some narrow passages leading to hidden areas of contemplation complete the picture. Of course there is always the retail. An indoor market that stretches along two parallel streets reminds me of the
country, where all this colourful alimentation comes from. But let's not go too far. A rather rural area, narrowed between a town and a
highway is full of adventure. Small plantations along a narrow stream, scattered throughout the almost wild landscape, surely refer to a more local
culture. Creativity in re-use of materials is common – but so are mosquitoes. All that having a reference of an old aqueduct, sign of another kind of
p r o g r e s s o f a m u c h o l d e r a g e . A n y w a y , n o w I c a n g o t o C a n B o i x e r e s m e t r o s t a t i o n a n d g e t b a c k t o t h e c i t y .
b.eixample
c:can boixeres
AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART01:ANALYSIS__GEORGE KALLISBIArch
infastructure
communication
digital platform skin
surface
technology
artificial
skin
technology
innovation
traffic flow public space
contemplation
horizontalmodernity
interaction
introverted landscapemosquitoes production
a.22@
c b a
AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART01:ANALYSIS__GEORGE KALLISBIArch
ENVIRONMENT 22@
AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART02:ENVIRONMENT__GEORGE KALLISBIArch
the built environment at its best: a series
of artificially controlled environments.
using latest technology for precise climate
control. over-designed landscape:
everything must be perfect. new trends on
“green” architecture and landscape
design can be applied; here is a platform
for experimentation. the perfect nature =
human-controlled nature = artificial nature.
from the moat-like water pond of torre
agbar to the over-detailed metal
extravaganza of the diagonal-mar park: a
sample book of micro-environments
trying to offer the maximum comfort for
t h e c o n t e m p o r a r y c i t i z e n s .
shadows of the high-rises
public vegetation
articulated small spaces
a casual water-fountain
rambla de poble-nou
scattered benches
demolished buildings
empty plots
diagonal promenade
low traffic streets
between buildings
AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART02:ENVIRONMENT__GEORGE KALLISBIArch
#dia
gonal
ave
nue
: tre
e s
had
ow
, car
nois
e, t
ram
mic
rocl
imat
e
#micro-environment package:
#restaurant near agbar
#rambla de poblenou microclimate:
#shadow, increased comfort parameters
#micro-environment package:
#diagonal-mar
#12
#07
#36
#57d
occasional exception?in-between space
AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART02:ENVIRONMENT__GEORGE KALLISBIArch
• • air-conditioning •
• climate control • •
strong shell • •
ventilation • • HVAC •
• hot and cold water
supply• • planters • •
plastic trees • •
thermal insulation • •
acoustic insulation • •
blinds • • solar panels
• • anti-glare systems
• •
• • air-
conditioning
• • climate
control • •
strong shell
• •
ventilation •
• HVAC • •
hot and cold
water
supply• •
planters • •
plastic trees
• • thermal
insulation • • the in-between: possibilities for temporary comfort
AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART02:ENVIRONMENT__GEORGE KALLISBIArch
AD.501_MATERIALITY I__PART02:ENVIRONMENT [SITE SELECTION]____GEORGE KALLISBIArch
public space under mediapro building
possibility of new in-between environment [between diagonal + mediapro buildings]
public interaction
free flows permeable boundariesin-between space
GEOMETRY can boixeres
AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART03:GEOMETRY__GEORGE KALLISBIArch
geometry as a manmade response
soft
hard
to the existing
environmental [topographical, climatic] conditions
adapting to the topography
exploiting existing contours
minimal alterations
recycling of materials
environment as boundaries
soft ground manipulation
earth as material
topography as obstacle
overcoming existing contours
strong interventions
uniform structure
avoiding ground contact
the aquaduct: overcoming the altitude
difference, crossing two
sides of a stream
layered levels: creating horizontal
surfaces for planting
defining areas : using recycled
materials or
vegetation. Porous
borders
BIArch AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART03:GEOMETRY__GEORGE KALLIS
s o f t d e f i n i n g
v e g e t a t i o n e n c l o s u r e
t o p o g r a p h y a d j u s t m e n t
p a r c e l l i n g
soft hardvs
BIArch AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART03:GEOMETRY__GEORGE KALLIS
recyclin
g o
f m
ate
rials
layere
d g
rou
nd
s
po
rou
s b
ou
nd
ari
es
veg
eta
tio
n e
nclo
sure
den
se v
eg
eta
tio
n b
ord
ers
path
way
hard
geo
metr
y: aq
uad
uct
soft hardhardvs
BIArch AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART03:GEOMETRY__GEORGE KALLIS
soft hardhardvs
AD.501_MATERIALITY I__PART03:GEOMETRY [SITE + GEOMETRY SELECTION]____GEORGE KALLISBIArch
softsoft hardhard+t e m p o r a r y h a b i t a t s i t e : “ u n d e r t h e b r i d g e ”
p r o p o s e d s o f t g e o m e t r y
e x i s t i n g h a r d g e o m e t r y
temporary habitat geometry:
existing enclosure [hard: under the
bridge + soft: between the two
river banks]
new texture [controlling porosity +
microperforation using similar local
techniques]
solar protection
wind protection
rain protection
visibility control
acoustic comfort
translucency
micro-perforation
subtle control of isolation-
integration
microclimatic control
creation of a semi-private
space
s u n di r e c
t i on
MATTER eixample
AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART04:MATTER__GEORGE KALLISBIArch
FA
CA
DE
a. GROUND FLOOR
b. UPPER FLOORS
c. ATTIC
INT
ER
FA
CE
- L
EV
EL
S O
F IN
TE
RA
CT
ION
W
ITH
P
UB
LIC
S
PA
CE
earth materials
uniform building image
different facades / constitute one multi-facade
independent materials
almost detached image
multiple layers of materials: personally controlled
interface
separate texture: controlled through time + day
direct public interaction dependent on the
material texture and transparency
public space:variable SIZE, TEXTURE, ACCESSIBILITY,
PERCEPTION
dependent on 4 SURFACES constituting its
BOUNDARIES [paving, wall, trees, street
edge]
environmental conditions + geometry
dependent on SURFACE MATERIAL treatment
in out
in out + out surface
in out
VISUAL INTERACTION
VISUAL INTERACTION
TA C T I L E I N T E R A C T I O N
matter-energy-information exchange
BIArch AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART04:MATTER__GEORGE KALLIS
PUBLIC SPACE EDGE CONDITIONS: isurface manipulation matters
generic condition:
paving - manipulated earth
special condition: path
less manipulated earth
playground: safety
selected earth
private property: differ
more manipulated earth
entrance: threshold
specially manipulated earth
planting: edges
earth vs. manipulated earth
street: accessibility
carefully manipulated earth
open space: enclosure
plant on manipulated earth
services: infrastructure
modules on manipulated earth
special feature: signage
inscriptions on manipulated earth
physical vs manipulated matter:
BIArch AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART04:MATTER__GEORGE KALLIS
PUBLIC SPACE EDGE CONDITIONS: ii
threshold matters
condition: private entrance
light metallic barrier
condition: inviting
glass-transparency, wood
condition: controlled entry
strong metal - movable
condition: no access
strong metal, opaque stone
THRESHOLD 1: PUBLIC-PRIVATE
variable material - different properties
alteration of earth manipulation
[wood-stone-masonry-glass-metal]
THRESHOLD 2: STREET PROTECTION
vegetation as material
modules of greenery defining space
[safety-visual comfort]
l e v e l s o f m a t t e r m a n i p u l a t i o n – a c c e s s i b i l i t y + u s e c o n t r o l
BIArch AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART04:MATTER__GEORGE KALLIS
PUBLIC SPACE EDGE CONDITIONS: iii
enclosure matters
ground side
topside
physical state matter
as enclosure
manipulated matter
as enclosure
AD.501_MATERIALITY I__PART04:MATTER [SITE + GEOMETRY + MATERIAL]____GEORGE KALLISBIArch
C A R R E R D E A R A G Ó : L A C K O F N AT U R A L M AT T E R L A C K O F E N C L O S E D P U B L I C S PA C E
INVERTED BALCONIES : TEMPORARY PARASITE HABITAT[S ]
lack of nature as material no enclosed public space new enclosed public space
lifted green habitat
public-private interface:
low-tech
non-opaque
veg
eta
tio
nw
icker
fab
ric
recycle
d s
cra
p
osb
bam
bo
o
recycle
d p
last
ic
sun control
visibility control
TECHNIQUE eixample
ATEV AI CR CP G EN SIR SET L E -H S P- RNO OIT VCU IR DTS IN NOC G
D I VL ISO US A - L AE ND DA C AA CF OL UA SN TR IE C
T COX ME F- O R TE -C LIA MF ITIR NGU AS C CET SSN -E IND N DEPE
S E- PSS AECO RCA AM R L O - TE A NU IE F S OR V I EU XT TC ERU IR O
T RS AR NET D - IH NLI TG N ERIO OI RT
CU
RTS INN NEO R FC A CYE A LF DR EAM N I - A Min
terior
to
exterior
conditio
ns
outer
to
inner
facade
AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART05:TECHNIQUE__GEORGE KALLISBIArch
inner
tech
niq
ue[s]
oute
r te
chniq
ue[s]
inte
riorize
d
tech
niq
ue[s]
techniq
ue[s] o
f separa
tion +
connectio
n
BIArch AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART05:TECHNIQUE__GEORGE KALLIS
solid/perforated
solid+image
solid/articulated
filigree/controlledopened-up/ornamented
INNER FACADE
OUTER FACADE
space between
BIArch AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART05:TECHNIQUE__GEORGE KALLIS
FROMTO TO
TOTOFROM
FROM
FROM
control
methods
between
inside
and
outside
technique[s]
of inner facade
technique[s]
of outer facadeinteraction?
BIArch AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART05:TECHNIQUE__GEORGE KALLIS
separation area: between facades
ACTIVITY AND USE
eixample
AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART06:ACTIVITY / USE__GEORGE KALLISBIArch
activity / use
infrastructure
accessibility
mechanisms allowing for “activation”
transparency--opacity
exposed--hiddenfree--restricted
internal
(private)
external
(public)
how can the area of transition between the interior and the
exterior space of the ”eixample manzanas” be manipulated to
allow for public activation of the interior?
open--closed
pre-requisites for activity
transition networks
urban furniture
supply networks
regulations
going to / coming from
going to / coming from
space of transition
BIArch AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART06:ACTIVITY / USE__GEORGE KALLIS
infrastructure: urban furniture
infrastructure: supply networks-water
regulations: pedestrian crossing
accessibility: transparent/exposed
infrastructure-accessibility:
light post
accessibility: open/inviting
infrastructure: playground
BIArch AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART06:ACTIVITY / USE__GEORGE KALLIS
public activity public activity extension private activity extension private activity
underground parking
bar/café passage - public courtyard
arcade
shop
inter twining: extension of public activity into private space
BIArch AD.501_MATERIALITY I_PART06:ACTIVITY / USE__GEORGE KALLIS
FROM PRIVATE TO PUBLIC ACTIVITY
FROM PUBLIC TO PRIVATE ACTIVITY
AD.501_MATERIALITY I__PART06:ACTIVITY / USE [SITE: EIXAMPLE]____GEORGE KALLISBIArch
from horizontal ground-level public activity to multi-level public + private interactivity
infrastructure
accessibility
regulations
public activators
inserted across private space
new public space
= transition space between street + inner courtyard
= temporary habitat for temporary activities
FORM eixample
how can the area of transitionbetween the street and the
courtyard of eixample allow for public activation?
BIArch __AD.501_MATERIALITY I___FALL 2010_____GEORGE KALLIS
internal external
going to / coming from
going to / coming from
SPACE OF TRANSITIONEXTERIOR 1
PUBLIC
TRAFFIC
CITY SCALE
EXTERIOR 2
PRIVATE [PUBLIC]
CONTEMPLATION
BLOCK SCALE
PASSAGE
PUBLICCOURTYARD
GARDEN
MARKET
BUILDING +PARK
“CROSSING” EIXAMPLE BLOCKSTHE TRANSITION AREA BETWEEN STREET AND COURTYARD:ALLOWING FOR PUBLIC ACTIVATION
pass
atge
de
la C
once
pció
mer
cat de
la
Conc
epció
palau
robe
rtjard
ins
de la
torre
de les
aigüe
sbo
ulev
ard
rosa
- f
unda
ció
Tap
iés
jard
ins
de r
ecto
r oliver
asbibliote
ca d
e sa
nt a
nton
i
THE GENERIC PLAN:CERDA’S BLOCK TYPOLOGIES VISION (1859)
ALTERATION OF THE GENERAL BLOCK TYPOLOGY: FROM MASS ON VOID
BETWEEN VEGETATION TO VOID IN MASS.
CLEAR DISTINCTION AND SEPARATION BETWEEN INNER AND OUTER ENVIRONMENT
OF THE BLOCK
PRIVATE
P U B L I C
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
SEMIPRIVATE
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
P U B L I C
P U B L I C
HOW IS “ACTIVE CROSSING” ACHIEVED?
EXCEPTIONS OF THE GRID - PUBLIC ACTIVITY CROSSING PRIVATE AND ENTERING
THE COURTYARD
PRIVATE SPACE (APARTMENT, OFFICE)
“PASSIVE CROSSING”
ARCADES
BIArch __AD.501_MATERIALITY I___FALL 2010_____GEORGE KALLIS
1. “CAR CROSSING”: PARKING AREAS
2. “FUNCTIONAL CROSSING”: BUILDINGS + OPEN PUBLIC SPACES
2. “CROSSING MECHANISMS”: PUBLIC ACCESSIBILITY INFRASTRUCTURE
STREETTYPOLOGES
EXCEPTION:PLAZA CREATION
PLAYGROUNDFACILITIES
PUBLICFACILITIES
PASSAGE
RAMPACCESS
MARKET
CHURCH ANDPUBLIC BUILDING
SHOP ARCADE
SHOP ARCADE
TYPOLOGYEXCEPTION
BIArch __AD.501_MATERIALITY I___FALL 2010_____GEORGE KALLIS
FROM PASSIVE (PRIVATE) TO ACTIVE (PUBLIC) TRANSITION: “FORMS OF CROSSING”
COURTYARD
STREET
STREET
FROMTO
FROM
TO
CONTEMPLATION
MICRO-COURTYARD
FROM
TO
STREET
SHOPCOURTYARD(S)
COURTYARD
STREET
FROM
TO
TO FROM
RELIGIOUSBUILDING
COURTYARD
S I G N A G E - I N F O
SIGNAGE
P
STREET
STREET
STREET
P U B L I CACTIVITYP U B L I C
COURTYARD
FROMTO
FROMTO
COURTYARD(PUBLIC)
STREET
PUBLICFACILITY
PRIVATE
COURTYARD(PUBLIC)
STREET
CHURCH
PRIVATE
PATIO
STREET
PARKING(UNDER COURTYARD)
PRIVATE
STREET
PRIVATE
STREET
COURTYARD(SEMI-PUBLIC)
STREET
STREET
PATIO
PATIO
PRIVATE
UNDERGROUND PARKING - UNDER COURTYARD
OVER-GROUND PARKING - ON COURTYARD
STREET
STREET
STREET STREET
SHOP
COURTYARD(COVERED)
SHOP
COURTYARD
STREET
FROMTO
FROM
TO
COURTYARD(PUBLIC)
STREET
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
ARCADE CROSSING - COURTYARD ON TOP
OVERLAPPING OF CROSSINGS:BUILDING / ARCADE / PARKINGGEOMETRY DERIVING FROM PROPERTY
PUBLIC CROSSING THROUGH ALL THE BLOCK
FUNDACIÓTAPIÉS P
SHOP
SHOP
SHOP
SHOP
SHOP
SHOP
SHOP
SHOP
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
PASSAGE CROSSINGCOURTYARD BECOMES PUBLICDIFFERENT PROXIMITY WITH PRIVATE
A
B
C
D
E
F