maria helena nazaré universidade de aveiro portugal post 2010 a new reality
TRANSCRIPT
Maria Helena NazaréUniversidade de AveiroPortugal
Post 2010 A New Reality.
A Decade of Change 2000/2010
• Bologna 3 cycle degree
structure, ECTS, diploma
supplement
• Greater flexibility of learning
paths
• Convergent National Policy
Changes
Institutional autonomy
Funding
Quality Assurance
Implementation of Bologna cycles (TRENDS 2010)
Impact of National Policies (Autonomy, Funding and Quality) at Institutional level.
Impact at European level.
• Negative demographic trends ( Ireland is the exception).
• Financial meltdown caused by the banking sector results in
a global economic crisis (still!) impacting severely on
Europe.
• Increase in youth unemployment.
• 40 million migrants; 10% from Síria
• A Brave New World? Not brave at all and not so new!
• A NEW OLD ROLE for UNIVERSITIES.
The Changed Context 2010------
Evolution of 65+ age group 2004-2014
Average age of population 20042014
unemployment Youth
The national policy reform process remains very dynamic but IS NO
LONGER CONVERGENT even within the EU.
Funding QA Student recruitment Internationalisation Governance&Autonomy0
4
8
12
16
20
Comparison 2010-20152010 2015
Reforms with high degree of importance
nº o
f Cou
ntrie
s
The Changed Context 2010------ impacts HE
451 Institutions, 46 Countries.
Funding Reform – the most recurrent policy change
The crisis has had a number of consequences:
Different ways of allocating funds: in some cases altering the
balance between core and competitive project funding
Growth in the nº of researchers on fixed term contracts
Freezes and contractual changes
Salaries of academic and administrative staff have been cut in a
number of countries.
Note: Fees an hot topic
Funding 2008-2014
Student recruitment & Internationalisation
The new economic reality- crisis, youth unemployment, requirements of the knowledge society, globalization – has led to additional emphasis on increasing student participation.
42%
20%
16%
10%
9%
3%
Enrolment change (last 5 years)
Increased by more than 10%
Increased by less than 10%
Decreased by less than 10%
No change
Decreased by more than 10%
No information
Notes: Tendency (weak) of large institutions reporting an increase. Decrease attributed to demography and financial situation. Responses about expectations seem to correlate with institutional size and country location, Ex: Czech R, Lithuania and Poland are among the 14% that anticipated a decrease.
39%
35%
14%
10%
2
Expected development of student enrolment
Will increase Remain at current level
Will decrease Impossible to predict
NA
Looking into the crystal ball
Changing composition of the student body over the last five years
Notes: Greater diversity of backgrounds. The growth of international students (EU and non-EU) is the main change (may be linked to the possibility of charging higher fees for non-EU students). The Ranking effect!
Non-EU
EU
FT
Disabled
PT
Socio-economic disadvantaged
Mature
Ethnic minority
Without standard entry qualifcations
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
NA No change
Decreased Increased
Open access to research publications
• OA transition must not increase costs – integration into grants
• University self-archiving• The issue of data
EUA monitoring national developments and in dialogue publisher groups
Challenges
Evolving geographical divide in Europe in terms of
investment in universities and negative demography.
Entrenchment of policies previously presented as temporary
measures.
Recovery may become increasingly more difficult; loss of
competitiveness. Alarming state of universities infrastructure.
Challenge for Europe harmed by these imbalances and
weaknesses.
The larger picture: Social Cohesion – generations, migrants
Challenges represent Responsibilities and
Opportunities for Universities.
Issues which need contribution from all
disciplines and research fields plus commitment
from academics.
Universities can and should do something
about it!
Integrate Knowledge. Educate Citizens!
Education ≠ Training. Ethics.
Role for Universities
Light House