maral alyari, state university of new york at buffalo on

12
Top quark-antiquark cross section from highly Lorentz-boosted tops Maral Alyari, State University of New York at Buffalo on behalf of the CMS collaboration USLUA Annual meeting 2015 US LHC Users Association Meeting 11-13 Nov 2015, Batavia, IL (United States) 1

Upload: others

Post on 16-Oct-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Maral Alyari, State University of New York at Buffalo on

Top quark-antiquark cross section from highly Lorentz-boosted tops

Maral Alyari, State University of New York at Buffaloon behalf of the CMS collaboration

USLUA Annual meeting2015 US LHC Users Association Meeting11-13 Nov 2015, Batavia, IL (United States)

1

Page 2: Maral Alyari, State University of New York at Buffalo on

Introduction

2M. Alyari USLUA Annual meeting, 11-13 Nov 2015Documentation: CMS PAS TOP-14-012

Goal:

Motivation:

• Measure differential tt production cross section in µ/e+jets final state at parton and particle level for PT(top) > 400 GeV

• Full 8 TeV 2012 data sample of 19.7 ± 0.5 fb-1

• Boosted topology- decay products fully merged- Sensitive to new physics- Important background for many searches

• Complementary measurement- Existing CMS analyses suboptimal for high PT region

arXiv:1511.00549

Page 3: Maral Alyari, State University of New York at Buffalo on

3

Analysis Strategy

• Measure tt cross section for top PT > 400 GeV decay products are merged & reconstructed as one “top-tagged” jet

• Final State:- Top-tagged jet- Single µ/e- b-tagged jet

• Perform fit in 3 kinematic regions to determine top-tagging efficiency

• Extract background normalizations • Measure integrated cross section • Unfold background subtracted top PT to

extract differential cross section in bins of PT(top) at particle and parton levels

M. Alyari USLUA Annual meeting, 11-13 Nov 2015

• Backgrounds: - Single Top (POWHEG)- Non Signal tt (POWHEG)- W+Jets (Madgraph)- QCD (Data driven)

Log likelihood (2*log(L)) as a function of the top-tagging scale factor nuisance parameter and signal cross section multiplier for combined µ+e channels

CMS Work in Progress

Page 4: Maral Alyari, State University of New York at Buffalo on

4

Event Selections and Kinematic Regions

M. Alyari USLUA Annual meeting, 11-13 Nov 2015

top-tagged jet b-tagged jet

µ/e• PT > 45/35 GeV• |η| < 2.1/2.5 • Pass a 2D cutΔR(μ/e, jet) > 0.5 or pTrel (μ/e, jet) > 25 GeV

• e passes triangle cut|∆φ(e or leading j, ETmiss )-1.5|<1.5* ETmiss

75 GeVRed

uce

QC

D

• AK5 jet (anti-KT, R=0.5)• PT > 30 GeV• Leptonic side: ∆R (µ/e, j)<π/2• Secondary vertex mass > 0• Combined Secondary Vertex

medium

• CA8 jet (Cambridge-Aachen, R=0.8)• PT > 400 GeV• Hadronic side: ∆R (µ/e, j)>π/2• Reconstructed using

cmsTopTagger algorithm

Three exclusive kinematic regions: • 0 top-tag• 1 t-tag 0 b-tag• 1 t-tag 1 b-tag } used for differential measurement

used to constrain the top-tag efficiency}

Page 5: Maral Alyari, State University of New York at Buffalo on

-1

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.81

1.00 -0.28 -0.10 0.00 -0.19 -0.44 -0.39 -0.87

-0.28 1.00 0.18 0.02 0.20 -0.00 -0.57 0.10

-0.10 0.18 1.00 0.00 0.16 0.06 -0.20 0.04

0.00 0.02 0.00 1.00 0.49 -0.03 -0.31 -0.06

-0.19 0.20 0.16 0.49 1.00 -0.00 -0.34 0.11

-0.44 -0.00 0.06 -0.03 -0.00 1.00 -0.06 0.37

-0.39 -0.57 -0.20 -0.31 -0.34 -0.06 1.00 0.50

-0.87 0.10 0.04 -0.06 0.11 0.37 0.50 1.00

signal

β JEC JER N(el QCD)N(mu QCD)

N(single top)

N(W+jet)Top-tagging

signalβ

JEC

JER

N(el QCD)

N(mu QCD)

N(single top)

N(W+jet)

Top-tagging

CMSPreliminary (8 TeV)-119.7 fb

5

Systematic Uncertainties

M. Alyari USLUA Annual meeting, 11-13 Nov 2015

Experimental Uncertainties (treated as nuisance parameters in likelihood fit)

Theoretical Uncertainties

• Top-tagging efficiency (dominant) (rate and shape) • Jet energy scale (rate and shape) • Jet energy resolution (rate and shape)• Normalization (rate only)

• W+jets normalization ±50%• Single top normalization ±50% • QCD normalization ±100%

• PDF• Q2

Page 6: Maral Alyari, State University of New York at Buffalo on

6

Event Counts

M. Alyari USLUA Annual meeting, 11-13 Nov 2015

Background}

}

Background

Integrated Cross Section for PT > 400 GeV :

Sample

Number of events (µ+jets channel)

0 t tag 1 t tag, 0 b tag 1 t tag, 1 b tag

t

¯

t(signal) 1923 ± 144 359 ± 27 271 ± 20

t

¯

t(non-semilep) 478 ± 36 44.7 ± 3.4 29.7 ± 2.2

Single top 294 ± 135 14.4 ± 6.6 4.1 ± 1.9

W+jets 4786 ± 327 154 ± 11 3.9 ± 0.3

QCD 358 ± 169 13.4 ± 6.3 7.6 ± 3.6

Total 7838 586 317

Data 7712 622 306

Sample

Number of events (e+jets channel)

0 t tag 1 t tag, 0 b tag 1 t tag, 1 b tag

t

¯

t(signal) 1562 ± 117 289 ± 22 226 ± 17

t

¯

t(non-semilep) 458 ± 34 40.0 ± 3.0 30.1 ± 2.3

Single top 261 ± 120 11.6 ± 5.3 3.2 ± 1.5

W+jets 3667 ± 250 130 ± 8.9 2.7 ± 0.2

QCD 757 ± 128 68 ± 11 10.5 ± 1.8

Total 6704 537 273

Data 6833 538 242

1

Page 7: Maral Alyari, State University of New York at Buffalo on

7

Post-Fit Kinematics

M. Alyari USLUA Annual meeting, 11-13 Nov 2015

0 top-tag 1 t-tag 0 b-tag 1 t-tag 1 b-tag

(hadronic top) [GeV]T

p400 500 600 700 800 900

Even

ts /

10 G

eV

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800Data

Signaltt Othertt

Single Topνµ →W

QCDUncertainty

CMSPreliminary

(8 TeV)-119.7 fb

0 b-tag≥0 t-tag + +Jetsµ

Post-fit yields

(hadronic top) [GeV]T

p400 500 600 700 800 900

Dat

a/M

C

0

1

2

(hadronic top) [GeV]T

p400 500 600 700 800 900

Even

ts /

10 G

eV

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Data Signaltt Othertt

Single Topνµ →W

QCDUncertainty

CMSPreliminary

(8 TeV)-119.7 fb

0 b-tag≥0 t-tag + e+JetsPost-fit yields

(hadronic top) [GeV]T

p400 500 600 700 800 900

Dat

a/M

C

0

1

2

(hadronic top) [GeV]T

p400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200

Even

ts /

25 G

eV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Data Signaltt Othertt

Single Topνµ →W

QCDUncertainty

CMSPreliminary

(8 TeV)-119.7 fb

1 t-tag + 0 b-tag+Jetsµ

Post-fit yields

(hadronic top) [GeV]T

p400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200

Dat

a/M

C0

1

2

(hadronic top) [GeV]T

p400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200

Even

ts /

25 G

eV

0

20

40

60

80

100

Data Signaltt Othertt

Single Topνµ →W

QCDUncertainty

CMSPreliminary

(8 TeV)-119.7 fb

1 t-tag + 0 b-tage+JetsPost-fit yields

(hadronic top) [GeV]T

p400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200

Dat

a/M

C

0

1

2(hadronic top) [GeV]

Tp

400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200

Even

ts /

25 G

eV

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Data Signaltt Othertt

Single Topνµ →W

QCDUncertainty

CMSPreliminary

(8 TeV)-119.7 fb

1 t-tag + 1 b-tage+JetsPost-fit yields

(hadronic top) [GeV]T

p400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200

Dat

a/M

C0

1

2

µ +

jets

e +

jets

(hadronic top) [GeV]T

p400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200

Even

ts /

25 G

eV

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Data Signaltt Othertt

Single Topνµ →W

QCDUncertainty

CMSPreliminary

(8 TeV)-119.7 fb

1 t-tag + 1 b-tag+Jetsµ

Post-fit yields

(hadronic top) [GeV]T

p400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200

Dat

a/M

C

0

1

2

Page 8: Maral Alyari, State University of New York at Buffalo on

8

Differential Cross Section and Uncertainties

M. Alyari USLUA Annual meeting, 11-13 Nov 2015

POWHEG, MadGraph predict harder distribution than measured

(1/G

eV)

T/d

1/

-410

-310

-210

DatatPowheg+Pythia6 t

tMadGraph+Pythia6 tStat. Uncertainty

Syst.⊕Stat.

CMS Preliminary

(8 TeV)-119.7 fb

(GeV)T

Particle-level top p400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200Th

eory

/Dat

a

0.60.8

11.21.4

(1/G

eV)

T/d

1/

-410

-310

-210

DatatPowheg+Pythia6 t

tMadGraph+Pythia6 tStat. Uncertainty

Syst.⊕Stat.

CMS Preliminary

(8 TeV)-119.7 fb

(GeV)T

Top quark p400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200Th

eory

/Dat

a0.60.8

11.21.4

Particle Level Parton Level

Page 9: Maral Alyari, State University of New York at Buffalo on

9

Conclusion

M. Alyari USLUA Annual meeting, 11-13 Nov 2015

• Measured differential tt production cross section at parton and particle level for PT(top) > 400 GeV

• Preliminary 8 TeV result public, publication in progress

• POWHEG, MadGraph predict harder distribution than measured

• Repeat the analysis at 13 TeV with greater statistics

Page 10: Maral Alyari, State University of New York at Buffalo on

Backup Slides

USLUA Annual meeting, 11-13 Nov 2015M. Alyari 10

Page 11: Maral Alyari, State University of New York at Buffalo on

|ηMuon |

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2

Muo

ns /

0.1

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Data Signaltt Othertt

Single Topνµ →W

QCDUncertainty

CMSPreliminary

(8 TeV)-119.7 fb

+Jetsµ 0 b-tag, ≥0 t-tag + Post-fit yields

|ηMuon |0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2

Dat

a/M

C

0

1

2

11

Data and MC Predictionµ

+ je

tse

+ je

ts

M. Alyari USLUA Annual meeting, 11-13 Nov 2015

0 top-tag 1 t-tag 0 b-tag 1 t-tag 1 b-tag

|ηElectron |

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Elec

trons

/ 0.

1

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Data Signaltt Othertt

Single Topνµ →W

QCDUncertainty

CMSPreliminary

(8 TeV)-119.7 fb

0 b-tag, e+Jets≥0 t-tag + Post-fit yields

|ηElectron |0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Dat

a/M

C

0

1

2

|ηMuon |

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2

Muo

ns /

0.1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Data Signaltt Othertt

Single Topνµ →W

QCDUncertainty

CMSPreliminary

(8 TeV)-119.7 fb

+Jetsµ1 t-tag + 0 b-tag, Post-fit yields

|ηMuon |0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2

Dat

a/M

C0

1

2

|ηElectron |

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Elec

trons

/ 0.

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70Data

Signaltt Othertt

Single Topνµ →W

QCDUncertainty

CMSPreliminary

(8 TeV)-119.7 fb

1 t-tag + 0 b-tag, e+JetsPost-fit yields

|ηElectron |0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Dat

a/M

C

0

1

2

Leptonic-side secondary vertex mass (GeV)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Even

ts /

0.2

GeV

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Data Signaltt Othertt

Single Topνµ →W

QCDUncertainty

CMSPreliminary

(8 TeV)-119.7 fb

1 t-tag + 1 b-tag+Jetsµ

Post-fit yields

Leptonic-side secondary vertex mass (GeV)0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Dat

a/M

C

0

1

2

Leptonic-side secondary vertex mass (GeV)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Even

ts /

0.2

GeV

0

5

10

15

20

25

30Data

Signaltt Othertt

Single Topνµ →W

QCDUncertainty

CMSPreliminary

(8 TeV)-119.7 fb

1 t-tag + 1 b-tage+JetsPost-fit yields

Leptonic-side secondary vertex mass (GeV)0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Dat

a/M

C0

1

2

Page 12: Maral Alyari, State University of New York at Buffalo on

(GeV)T

Particle-level top p400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200

(GeV

)T

Top

quar

k p

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

57.2 4.3 1.5 0.7 0.5

25.7 64.0 4.7 1.2 1.6

2.7 22.5 66.3 5.0 3.0

1.1 2.9 20.4 67.0 7.7

0.1 0.8 1.7 12.9 82.0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80CMS Preliminary +Jets)µ( (8 TeV)-119.7 fb

(GeV)T

Particle-level top p400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200

(GeV

)T

Top

quar

k p

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

57.7 4.4 1.6 0.9 0.4

25.9 63.0 5.3 1.6 1.4

3.6 23.4 63.6 5.2 3.7

0.6 2.1 24.0 65.1 7.9

0.3 1.3 4.5 16.6 75.1

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

CMS Preliminary (e+Jets) (8 TeV)-119.7 fb

12

Response Matricesµ

+ je

tse

+ je

ts

Detector -> Particle Level Particle -> Parton Level

M. Alyari USLUA Annual meeting, 11-13 Nov 2015

(GeV)T

Reconstructed top-jet p400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200

(GeV

)T

Parti

cle-

leve

l top

p

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

86.7 13.3 0.0

12.1 76.2 11.6

2.3 14.0 71.6 12.1

0.9 3.2 12.7 69.1 14.1

2.6 1.1 1.5 16.4 78.3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

CMS Preliminary +Jets)µ( (8 TeV)-119.7 fb

(GeV)T

Reconstructed top-jet p400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200

(GeV

)T

Parti

cle-

leve

l top

p

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

84.5 15.5 0.0

9.4 77.3 13.2

2.4 9.7 73.6 14.3

1.7 1.3 12.5 67.1 17.5

2.1 2.6 3.5 5.7 85.5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

CMS Preliminary (e+Jets) (8 TeV)-119.7 fb