manuscript writing and publishing · draft make it flow, use proper language revise clarify ideas...
TRANSCRIPT
MANUSCRIPT WRITING AND PUBLISHING
Jennifer Cunningham Erves , PhD, MPH, MAEd, MS, CHESAssistant Professor of Research
Meharry Medical College
Objectives
We will discuss:
■ Core Components of Writing a Successful Manuscript
■ Manuscript Preparation
■ Choosing a Journal
■ The Peer Review Process
■ Ethical Issues in Medical Research Writing
Anatomy of a Manuscript
■ Title Page
■ Abstract
■ Introduction
■ Methods
■ Results
■ Tables/Figures
■ Discussion
■ Acknowledgements
■ References
Which to Write First?
Methods
Introduction
Figures/Tables
Results
Discussion
Abstract
Title Page
Acknowledgements
References
Title Page
■ Title– A few words to describe content– Many indicate study design (i.e.,
epidemiological studies)
■ Additional content of title page:– Authors affiliations, corresponding
author, running title, keywords, list of abbreviation
– Optional: Word Count, Number of Tables/Figures, Sources of grant support
ATTENTION GRABBER!!
Abstract
■ Summary of manuscript
■ 200-300 words
■ Structured or Unstructured
■ Descriptive, Critical, or Informational
■ Second most important section of manuscript
■ Content can vary pending on the type of article written
■ Be direct and succinct
Do NOT ….
■ Repeat the title
■ Refer to things outside the abstract– It needs to be able to stand alone!
■ Use References
■ Use Abbreviations
Keywords
■ Captures main topics for indexing
■ 3- 10 words
■ Be strategic so will be found in literature searches
■ Link it to what you are known for (e.g., community engagement, health disparities)
■ If a medical topic, then use the MeSH term in the keywords
What are MeSH terms?
■ Stands for Medical Subject Headings
■ U.S. National Library of Medicine medical vocabulary resource
■ Purpose: Provides hierarchical-organized terminology for indexing and cataloging of biomedical information in databases such as PUBmed/MEDLINE and other NLM databases.
■ Use of MeSH terms is not applicable for all journal submissions!
For more information on MeSH and identification of MeSH terms, please go to https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/meshhome.html
Introduction
■ Describes Importance of Topic
■ Summarizes relevant literature
■ “Funnel-Shaped Approach” for Writing
■ 1-1.5 pages
CONTENT
• Describe Public Health Burden
• Contributing factors to the Problem
• Previous work to address the problem
• Gap in the Literature• Thesis statement• Public health significance
Methods
■ Be clear on each step
■ 3-5 paragraphs
■ Most Common Components– Study Design– Theory (when applicable)– Subject Selection – Variables and Procedures– Analytic Methods– Human Subjects Approval
Quantitative Results
■ Narrative should be same logical sequence as tables/figures■ Summarize and not repeat all data from tables■ Include absolute numbers with percentages■ 3-4 paragraphs
– Paragraph 1: Patient Characteristics– Paragraph 2: Evidence for Objective 1– Paragraph 3: Evidence for Objective 2– Paragraph 4: Evidence for Objective 3
Qualitative Results
■ Narrative should be same logical sequence as tables/figures
■ Summarize and not repeat all data from tables
■ 3-4 paragraphs– Paragraph 1: Patient Characteristics– Paragraph 2: Theme 1– Paragraph 3: Theme 2– Paragraph 4: Theme 3– Paragraph 5: Theme 4
Discussion
■ Summarize new and important findings
■ Compare findings with the literature
■ Conclusions follow objectives
■ Describes where the topic is heading
■ Suggest clinical implications
■ Discuss Limitations and Next Steps
■ Provide Conclusion
References
■ Cite primary work over review articles
■ Avoid abstracts when possible
■ “In Press” Articles require permission
■ Avoid personal communication unless essential and not in public source
■ Check accuracy and formatting
■ Electronic citations should be considered
Reference Management Software
• EndNote• Zotero• Mendeley• RefWorks• BibTeX• RefME
Electronic Citations
■ Electronic citations must be cited because someone wrote the content.
■ How to evaluate an electronic citation– Is the author a qualified expert?– Who is the sponsoring organization? (.edu, .gov, .org)– Date of posting
■ Some electronic websites have no clear author such as government or organization websites.
■ Note: Wikipedia is NOT a reliable source!
Tables and Figures
Tables
■ Double space■ Each table on a single page■ Title summarizes data■ Do not use horizontal lines■ Give each column a heading■ Footnote explains content■ Identify statistical measures of
variation
Figures
■ Number consecutively according to cited
■ High resolution images■ Letters, numbers, and figures need
to be sufficient size■ Include titles and detailed
explanations in legends rather than figure
Writing Process
■ Co-Authors identify writing process– First author writes sections and co-authors edit– Co-authors choose sections
■ Choose your writing process– Write then Edit OR Edit while Writing
■ Prewrite brainstorm, outline, free write
■ Draft make it flow, use proper language
■ Revise clarify ideas
■ Edit grammar, mechanics
■ Publish finished product
Make sure to:
1. Create a Timeline for Co-Authors
2. Create a Block for Writing Times for
Yourself3. Identify the right setting
for writing4. Review Other Articles
for Guidance
Setting for Writing- BE CREATIVE!
Young pretty busines
Cheerful mixed race girl typin
Determining Authorship
■ Substantial contribution to:– Conception and design– Acquisition of data– Analysis and interpretation– Writing of Article
■ Draft and critical revision of manuscript for intellectual contact
■ Final approval of submitted version
■ Note: Some journals will provide authorship criteria upon submission!
Authorship Order
■ First Author: Design or conceive study; writes first draft; partners with last author for subsequent drafts
■ Second Author: Major contribution
■ Third Author: Important contributions
■ Last Author: Usually experienced investigator who partners with first author in interpretation, analysis, and writing
■ Middle Authors: Everyone else who qualifies for authorship
Authorship Grid
Choosing a Journal
■ Review Scope of Journal– If your articles does not have the same scope, NEXT!
■ Journal Prestige and Rankings– Impact Factors, Quality, Rankings
■ Review Published Studies– Compare most sections of manuscripts to see if a good fit.– For example, just because the scope is similar the journal may not have
a history of publishing qualitative research.
■ Review Reference Listings– Similar references indicate this journal could be IT!
Who is JANE?■ Stands for Journal/Author Name Estimator
■ JANE helps to:– Identify a journal, find relevant articles to cite in your manuscript,
and find reviewers if an editor
■ How does it work?– Enter title, abstract, and/or keywords of paper in box and click
‘find journals’, ‘find authors’, or ‘find articles’– JANE compares the information to documents in PubMed to find
best matching journals, authors, or articles
■ JANE relies on data in MEDLINE, PubMED, and Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) to identify high-quality journals and reduce chances of papers from predatory journals.
Impact Factors (Ifs)
■ The higher the IF, the more highly ranked the journal
■ It is used to compare journal in a subject category.
■ Top 5% of journals Ifs >/= 6
■ 2/3 of journals have IF > 1
■ Usually aim for 2 or higher!
Types of Journals
■ Paper
■ Electronic
■ Online-Submission Required
■ Online open access
■ Owned by a professional organization
■ Owned by a publisher
■ Owned by an individual for the betterment of their profession
■ Owned by a university
Journals
Signs a Journal is Predatory
■ Aggressively solicit scholars to submit papers.– Spam or individually flattering emails. – Will publish your article for a fee before reviewing it.
■ Claim peer review and its extremely short!■ Editorial board lack qualifications or are well-known with no input■ The scope is overly broad and/or does it fit well with your research.■ Publication frequency is irregular or not stated.■ May have the same or similar name to a legitimate journal■ Email address is non-professional (@yahoo.com, @aol.com or @gmail.com)
https://libguides.uml.edu/c.php?g=563165&p=5352697
Avoiding Predatory Journals
■ Think, Check, Submit– https://thinkchecksumit.org/
■ Beall’s List– https://beallslist.weebly.com/
– Note: Searchable by Publisher and by Journal Name
Choosing the Type of Paper
■ Original Research
■ Literature Reviews/Review articles
■ Clinical Trials
■ Opinion
■ Systematic Reviews
■ Meta-analysis
■ Rapid Communications
■ Cases Studies
■ Perspectives
■ Commentary
■ Conference Abstracts/Proceedings
■ Theoretical Model/Framework
■ Concept
■ Pilot Study
■ Letters to the Editor
■ Teaching Ideas
Pre-submission Inquiries: YES OR NO???■ Purpose: To determine if your
article is a good fit/ editors’ interest
■ Usefulness: Reduce time for manuscript publication
Pre-submission Inquiry: Content
■ Greeting: Identify Editor in Chief and be personable
■ Identify your Goals: Why you are writing the journal specifically
■ Connect your article to the journals’ purpose
■ Send Title and Abstract in submission
■ Closing: Thank the editor for their time, and express interest in their reply. Use words like “Sincerely” or “Best regards” in closing.
How To WRITE a compelling cover letter
■ Format of article
■ Brief summary of findings
■ Address contribution to the journal
■ Statement of non-redundancy of submission
■ No conflicts of interest
■ Ethical Statement
■ Approval of all authors
■ Contact Information for Corresponding Author
Manuscript Preparation
■ Review Submission Guidelines
■ Be aware of publishing schedules (biweekly, monthly, bimonthly, quarterly, annually, immediate (online and open access)
■ Never submit to multiple journals at ONE time
■ Title needs to catchy and reflect study; No more than 12 words
■ Abstract: 2nd most important part of manuscript
Peer Review Process
Submit Manuscript(6-15 months)
Manuscript Assigned Number
Editorial Review2-3 weeks
Assigned Peer review2- 3 Reviewers
(2-8 weeks)
REJECT
REJECT
REVISE OR CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTACCEPT REJECTGALLIES
2-6 monthsPUBLISHED1-3 months
AVAILABLE IMMEDIATELY
EMBARGOED
The Decision
■ Manages and review peer comments
■ Communicates decision to corresponding author
■ Breaks tie if peer reviewers divided!
■ Revisions- ASAP
■ More than 4 weeks to revise: Journal can require you to start over the peer review process.
Reasons for Revision Requests
■ Minor Faults in methodology
■ Minor inaccuracies in data
■ Inconsistencies among different sections of manuscripts
■ Faulty Deductions
■ Data do not support conclusions
■ Excessive data or text
■ Poor or excessive illustrations
■ Poor but salvageable
Peh and Ng, 2009
Once Accepted…
■ Review of a Galley Proof by all authors
■ Last time to make corrections!
■ Return in specific period according to journal
■ Be ready to pay fees if that’s the journals requirement (e.g., submission fees, page proof fees, change fees
Reasons for Rejection
■ Outside Scope of Journal
■ Incomplete Submission
■ Poor Methodology
■ Faulty Experimental Design
■ Major Flaws in Result Interpretation
■ Extremely Poor Writing
■ Duplicated or Plagiarised Work
IS THERE LIFE AFTER A PAPER
REJECTION?
YES!!Review comments and adapt prior to future submission!
Peh and Ng, 2009
When do I write my own manuscript?
■ Once you have received independence
■ Completed R01
■ Research decreases and number of projects involved in increases
■ Focus is to gain grants and tenure
■ Leader in the field
Writing Ethics■ You must be committed to ethical
principles even if it delays your work!
■ Common ethical issues include:
Writing Resources
Final Advice
■ Start Writing Early (e.g., introduction and methods during data collection)
■ Writing Partner, Team, or Manuscript Sprints
■ Focus on High Visibility Components- Title, Abstract, Tables/Figures
■ Organization with Headings and Subheadings
■ Finish strong: Outside Reviewers to read paper
■ Don’t harass any of the journals editors pre, during, and post-submission– You can be flagged and automatically rejected
Welch, 1999
Final Advice
■ Rewrite, rewrite, rewrite
■ Proofread, proofread, proofread
■ Check all your numbers for accuracy and consistency
■ Use software for references but still check them for accuracy
WritersWriteEvery dayHave you written anything yet?