mandatory review of early childhood education qualifications sector meetings draft qualifications...
TRANSCRIPT
Mandatory Review of Early
Childhood Education Qualifications
Sector meetings draft qualifications consultation
16, 17, 23 July 2014
National Qualifications Services (NQS), NZQANZ Career College
Waiariki Institute of Technology
Agenda for meeting today…
• Welcome and introductions• Setting the scene
– Review of Qualifications - TRoQ, MRoQ – Qualifications design and programmes
• ECE Review– Governance Group – Working groups – Journey to date
• Draft qualifications – overview, discussion groups
• Progress updates and next steps
Setting the scene
Reviews of Qualifications
•TRoQ
•MRoQ - Mandatory review of qualifications
•Qualifications and programmes
•Programmes of study
5
Targeted review of qualifications
Led to the most significant changes to the qualifications system since the National Qualifications Framework was established in the early 1990s
Changes include:
– Simplifying the qualifications system – New Zealand Qualifications Framework
– Ensuring qualifications are fit-for-purpose and relevant
– Reducing the number of qualifications by removing duplication and proliferation
– Mandatory reviews of qualifications (MRoQ) – NZ qualifications to replace local provider and national qualifications
6
Mandatory Review of Qualifications (MRoQ):New Zealand qualifications - what has changed?
• MRoQ - New Zealand qualifications have been replacing local provider and National qualifications at levels 1 – 6 (since late 2010)
• New rules for qualification design
• ‘Clusters’ of qualifications at levels 1-6 undergo the Mandatory Review process (first round will be complete by the end of 2014)
• Qualifications based on industry or community workforce needs
• Qualifications are developed collaboratively with stakeholders
• Clear and structured graduate outcomes including graduate profile, education and employment pathways in qualifications
• Flexible to allow programme development to meet learner needs
What happens in a mandatory review?Prepare for review:
– Establish lead, stakeholders, relationships & communication– Determine governance and working structures– Prepare project plan– Gather information to determine sector workforce needs & compile needs
analysis
Stage One: Pre-approval (application for approval to develop) – Prepare and confirm a revised map/landscape or suite of qualifications – Prepare new qualifications for pre-approval - develop strategic purpose
and graduate profile – Consult sector throughout – check needs being met – Submit Application for approval to develop qualifications
Stage Two: Listing (application for approval to list) – Complete qualification development and continue consultation – Submit Application for approval to list qualifications
8
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
Qu
ali
fic
ati
on
s
Fra
me
wo
rk
QUALIFICATION
STUDY PROGRAMME(Components &
standards)
STUDY PROGRAMME
(Component based)
TRAININGPROGRAMME(Unit standards)
PROVIDERSFull time study (may
include work experience)
ITO(s)Training & assessment
Arranged in the Workplace
ITO(s)Training & assessment
arranged – workplace and provider (e.g. block
course, distance learning)
De
liv
ery
/A
rra
ng
em
en
tsP
rog
ram
me
s o
f tr
ain
ing
an
d s
tud
y
Relationship between qualifications and programmes
Programmes of study• Qualifications designed with flexibility in mind…
– to allow providers to develop their own unique programmes towards the new New Zealand qualifications
– range of contexts
– different learners needs
– full or part time study, or work-based learning
– choice of approaches e.g. unit standards, alternative components (prescriptions/papers/courses), combination
• Programme approval – guidelines and criteria http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/providers-partners/approval-accreditation-and-registration/programme-approval-and-provider-accreditation/
Review structure - roles and responsibilities
Governance Group (ECE GG) supported by co-leads
•Provide strategic leadership for the review •Broad sector composition •Ensure new qualifications developed meet needs•Approve each stage of the qualifications development
Working Groups
•Provide technical input in the qualification development•Develop the qualifications based on the guidance from ECE GG – reflect the needs and feedback from stakeholders •Communication out to wider stakeholders
ECE Governance Group members (18)Ana Pickering Early Childhood Council nominee, Montessori Aotearoa NZ (MANZ)
Andy Walker (Chair) NZ College of Early Childhood Education, ITENZ, NZEALS
Arapera Royal Tangaere Te Kōhanga Reo National Trust nominee
Calmar Ulberg Barnardos New Zealand, Pasifika Plunket Team, Ohomairangi Trust
Cate Mawby NZ Playcentre Federation
Celeste Harrington Kidicorp, OMEP, NZARE
Deborah Wansbrough NZ Teachers Council
Derek Martin New Zealand Career College
Fereni Pepe Ete Pacific Training Institute, SAASIA
Jane Ewens Te Tari Puna Ora O Aotearoa - NZ Childcare Association
Jenny Walker Nanny Education Organisation of NZ (NEONZ); Rangi Ruru Early Childhood College
Jenny Yule Home Early Learning Organisation (HELO) nominee; PORSE
Jonine Nager Pouhere, Open Polytechnic, Atiawa nui te kohanga reo.
Iwi affiliations: Ngati Porou and Te Aitanga-a-Hauiti
Karin Dalgleish Ministry of Education – ECE Operational Policy Design
Liz Everiss Open Polytechnic; Early Education Federation
Peggy Luke-Ngaheke Waiwhetu Marae;Te Runanganui o Taranaki whanui ki te Upoko o Te Ika; Kohanga Reo
Rachelle Hautapu Te Whānau Tupu Ngātahi o Aotearoa (NZ Playcentre Association)
Iwi affiliations: Te Aitanga-a-Hauiti and Ngati Porou
Ruth Barnes Waiariki Institute of Technology
ECE General Working Group - 21/22 May & 5/6 June 2014
Adrianne Sudfelt PORSE Education and Training Ltd
Alison Stevenson Rangi Ruru Early Childhood College
Gillian Croad New Zealand Playcentre Federation
Jan Taouma A'oga Fa'a Samoa (NZEI Te Riu Roa nominee)
Jean Rockel University of Auckland
Jonine Nager Pouhere, Open Polytechnic, Atiawa nui te kohanga reo
Joanne Hayes Waiariki Institute of Technology
Kirsten Hughes Workforce Development Ltd
Michael Campbell New Zealand College of Early Childhood Education
Norah Fryer Aperfield Montessori Trust
Pamela McCullough Hawkes Bay District Health Board
Rachel Forrester Karanga Mai Teen Parents College
Sonja Rosewarne Open Polytechnic
Mātauranga Māori ECE Work Group - 21/22 May & 5/6 June
Juanita Rapana Ministry of Education
Melissa Nepe Apatu Te Kōhanga Reo o Ngā Mokopuna
Pamela McCullough Hawkes Bay District Health Board
Te Manu Moe Pohatu NZEI Te Riu Roa nominee
Wikitoria Ratu Waiwhetu Marae - Te Runanganui o Taranaki WhanuiArapera Royal Tangaere
ECE Governance Group attendee; Te Kōhanga Reo National Trust
Peggy Luke-NgahekeECE Governance Group attendee; Waiwhetu Marae;Te Runanganui o Taranaki whanui ki te Upoko o Te Ika; Kohanga Reo
Journey to date….• Co-leads
• Sector meetings November 2013
• Governance Group appointments – ECE GG
• Needs analysis
• Governance meetings – Jan/Feb
• Mātauranga Māori Evaluative Quality Assurance – MMEQA
• Strengthen Māori and Pasifika voice on GG
• Review plan submitted
• Proposed landscape consultation & needs analysis
• Working groups formed to develop draft qualifications
• Current consultation – draft qualifications
• Submit for approval to develop - by mid-September
What a new qualification looks like…• Qualification details: Title, Level, Credits, Type, NZSCED
• Strategic Purpose Statement: why does NZ need this qualification?
• Outcome Statement: Graduate profile - what will these graduates know, understand, and be able to do?Education Pathways - what could they study next?Employment Pathways - what jobs are they prepared for?or Contribution to community - how could they help?
• Specifications and conditions:-Differentiates mandatory and optional conditions for the qualification and/or individual outcomes
-Ensures there is sufficient information for programme developers to meet the graduate profile and qualifications requirements
19
Key evaluative questions – approval to develop
KEQ D1:
•How well has the need for the qualification(s) been established?
KEQ D2:
•How well do the qualification’s strategic purpose, graduate profile and general design address the identified needs of employers, industry and/or communities (i.e. relevant stakeholders)?
Discussion – ECE qualifications
Consider draft ECE qualifications - consultation feedback sought:
1.Do you support developing each new qualification further?
2.What could be done to improve each qualification?
3.Is the general suite coherent and does it provide pathways for candidates?
4.What specific improvements, if any, could be made to the draft qualifications (General ECE) to ensure they adequately address the needs of Pasifika learners and communities, employers, ECE sector and other stakeholders?
5.What specific improvements, if any, could be made to the draft qualifications (General ECE) to ensure they adequately address the needs of Māori learners in non-immersion settings?
Next steps...• Consultation on draft qualifications closes noon Friday 25 July
• Governance
– consider sector feedback to draft qualifications consultation
– Endorse qualifications for submitting for ‘approval to develop’ (September)
• Working groups - reconvene for further development work
• Needs analysis – final submitted at ‘approval to develop’
• Stakeholder engagement – draft qualifications consultation feedback; NZQF2 form completion
Contacts and progress updates…
• Mandatory Review of ECE Qualifications on NZQA website:http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/qualifications-standards/qualifications/early-childhood-education-qualifications/review-of-ece-qualifications/
• ECE email network (Stakeholder consultation list) – please ask your ECE contacts to be added to this network
• Team Mailbox: [email protected]