managing localisation and local plus€¦ · benefit and a decreased benefit. • mixed practices...
TRANSCRIPT
C O P Y R I G H T M E R C E R 2 0 1 5
• Localisation — a growing trend.
• From localisation to Local Plus (localisation — how).
• Pitfalls and best practices.
• Questions.
W H AT W E W I L L C O V E R T O D AY
C O P Y R I G H T M E R C E R 2 0 1 5
P O L L 1H O W D O Y O U D E F I N E A L O C A L A P P R O A C H ?
1. Compensation delivered in local currency from local payroll.
2. Compensation and benefits equivalent to those of localnational employees.
3. Compensation and benefits that are as close as possible to thoseof local national employees, but with additional allowances/benefitsnot provided to local nationals.
4. Other.
C O P Y R I G H T M E R C E R 2 0 1 5
L O C A L I S AT I O N — A G R O W I N G T R E N DD E F I N I T I O N S
LOCAL-PLUS• Pay according to the local compensation and
employment terms and conditions … plus …• Additional allowances/benefits elements.
LOCAL• Pay and benefits according to the local compensation
and employment terms and conditions.
LOCALISATION• Process of putting foreign employees on a “as local
as possible” compensation and benefits structure.
HOME-BASED• Based on home compensation structure and aiming
at the equivalent standard of living in the hostlocation as in the home location.
RA14
C O P Y R I G H T M E R C E R 2 0 1 5
COLAGoods andServices
Housing
IncomeTaxes
Housingallowance
Incrementaltaxes
Assignment —LocationCosts
Assignment —Location CostsPaid by Companyand From Salary
Home-CountryEquivalentPurchasingPower
IncomeTaxes
Goods andServices
Housing
Home-CountrySalary
Reserve ReserveReserve
Goods andServices
Housing
IncomeTaxes
Goods andServices
Housing
IncomeTaxes
Reserve
Assignment cost differentials
Premiums
L O C A L I S AT I O N — A G R O W I N G T R E N DD E F I N I T I O N S — T H E H O M E - B A S E DB A L A N C E S H E E T A P P R O A C H
C O P Y R I G H T M E R C E R 2 0 1 5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Local++• Local compensation.
+ Purchasing poweradjustment
+ Housing allowance+ International school+ International
pension plan+ International health
plan• Local employment
conditions.
Local+• Local compensation.
+ Purchasing poweradjustment
+ Housing allowance+ International school
• As necessary andphased out.
• Local employmentconditions.
Local• Local
compensation.• Local benefits.• Local
employmentconditions.
Purely LocalFull ExpatPackage Level
L O C A L I S AT I O N — A G R O W I N G T R E N DH O W M U C H L O C A L
C O P Y R I G H T M E R C E R 2 0 1 5
L O C A L I S AT I O N — A G R O W I N G T R E N DF R O M P A R I S T O S I N G A P O R E , I P E 5 5 , M + 2
EUR
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
Home-BasedBalanceSheet
Local PLus Local
Host Hypo Tax Incremental
Intl School
Housing
COLA
Hypo Tax&SS&FA
Net Base Salary
RA12
Slide 7
RA12 Inconsistent axis legend number format with graph on page 13, thousands delimitedRossier-Renaud, Anne, 14/04/2015
C O P Y R I G H T M E R C E R 2 0 1 5
L O C A L I S AT I O N — A G R O W I N G T R E N DH O W C O M P A N I E S A R E P A Y I N G T H E I RI N T E R N A T I O N A L A S S I G N E E S
• Most common way today: Balance sheet approach = home salary +allowances (employees on limited-duration international assignments arepaid using the home-based approach, enabling a similar standard of livingat host location).
• Rapidly growing trend: Local-plus approach =local salary + benefits not provided to local national employees.
But local-pluspackages are seeingeven more growth.
Balance sheetexpat packagesare growing.
C O P Y R I G H T M E R C E R 2 0 1 5
22%
20%
23%
14%
9%12%
No
Yes, a general trend for our international assignments
Yes, for certain types of assignments (e.g., trainees, developmental)
No, but we are seriously thinking about this option
Yes, but only for intra-regional assignments
Other
Source: Mercer 2012 Worldwide International Assignment Policies and Practices Survey and 2013Alternative International Assignments Policies and Practices Survey
• 67% of Europeanrespondents have foreignerson a Local Plus approach.
• Half reported that thenumber increased.
• 63% reported that theyexpect the number toincrease.
Do you send employees on local orLocal Plus terms and conditions?
L O C A L I S AT I O N — A G R O W I N G T R E N DL O C A L A S A N A L T E R N A T I V E —E U R O P E A N R E S P O N D E N T S
C O P Y R I G H T M E R C E R 2 0 1 5
P O L L 2W H A T A P P R O A C H ( E S ) D O Y O U U S E ?
1. We only use a home-based approach.
2. We only use a local (or Local Plus) approach.
3. We use both home-based and local (or Local Plus) approaches.
C O P Y R I G H T M E R C E R 2 0 1 5
Source: Mercer 2013 Alternative International Assignments Policies and Practices Survey
Worldwide
For permanent transfers 40%
For certain assignment locations 38%
For internationally hired foreigners 38%
After a maximum duration on expatpackage (localisation) 33%
For locally hired foreigners 31%
For certain position levels 27%
L O C A L I S AT I O N — A G R O W I N G T R E N DI N W H I C H C A S E S D O C O M P A N I E S O F F E RL O C A L P L U S P A C K A G E S ?
RA11
C O P Y R I G H T M E R C E R 2 0 1 5
P O L L 3I N W H I C H C A S E S D O Y O U O F F E RL O C A L P L U S P A C K A G E S ?
1. For permanent transfers.
2. For certain assignment locations.
3. For internationally/locally hired foreigners.
4. After a maximum duration on expat package (localisation).
5. Other?
RA10
Slide 12
RA10 For this question, we need multi choice answers, is this possible?Rossier-Renaud, Anne, 14/04/2015
C O P Y R I G H T M E R C E R 2 0 1 5
F R O M L O C A L I S AT I O N T O L O C A L P L U SW O R L D W I D E S A L A R Y C O M P A R I S O N 2 0 1 4A N N U A L T O T A L G U A R A N T E E D C A S H ( E U R )
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70
IPE Position Class
Brazil China (Shanghai) India Germany UK USA
Blue collarProfessional
Specialist
Manager
Director
VP
(EUR)RA13
Slide 13
RA13 Inconsistent axis legend number format with graph on page 7, NOT thousands delimitedRossier-Renaud, Anne, 14/04/2015
C O P Y R I G H T M E R C E R 2 0 1 5
USAGlobal 39%
HQ Europe 44% ChinaGlobal 38%
HQ Europe 30%
SingaporeGlobal 32%
HQ Europe 35%
UKGlobal 26%
HQ Europe 29%
Hong KongGlobal 18%
HR Europe 11%
UAEGlobal 18%
HQ Europe 21%
SwitzerlandGlobal 10%
HQ Europe 15%
Source: Mercer 2013 Alternative International Assignments Policies and Practices Survey
BrazilGlobal 5%
HQ Europe 9%
F R O M L O C A L I S AT I O N T O L O C A L P L U ST O P L O C A T I O N S W H E R E M U L T I N A T I O N A L SH A V E L O C A L P L U S ( % O F R E S P O N D E N T S )
C O P Y R I G H T M E R C E R 2 0 1 5
Plus Elements Brazil Singapore
Housing
Utilities
Dependents’ education
Transportation
Medical benefit
Pension Plan
COLA/Goods and Services
Mobility premium
Hardship premium N/A
Immigration assistance
Tax and social security assistance
Home leave support
Relocation assistance
Language training
Source: Mercer 2014 Local Plus Surveys
Common
Less common/limited
Never or rarely provided
L O C A L - P L U S P A C K A G E C O M P O N E N T SP R E V A L E N C E P R O V I S I O N O F“ P L U S ” E L E M E N T S
C O P Y R I G H T M E R C E R 2 0 1 5
H O W D O Y O U E S TA B L I S H T H E B A S ES A L A R Y F O R A F O R E I G N E R O N A L O C A LP L U S A P P R O A C H ? — S I N G A P O R E
One-wayinternationaltransfer
Internationallyhiredforeigners
Locally hiredforeigners
Localisedexpatriates
Internationalassignee of alimited long-termduration
N = 35 N = 37 N = 23 N = 32 N = 24
Based on localpay structurewithout adjustment
51% 43% 57% 41% 21%
Based on localpay structure withadjustments
20% 30% 26% 25% 21%
Home salaryconverted in hostcurrency
9% 5% 4% 9% 17%
Case by case 20% 19% 13% 19% 37%
It varies -- 3% -- 6% 4%
Source: Mercer 2014 Local Plus Surveys
C O P Y R I G H T M E R C E R 2 0 1 5
One-wayInternationalTransfer
Internationallyhiredforeigners
Locally hiredforeigners
Localisedexpatriates
Internationalassignee of alimited long-termduration
N = 35 N = 37 N = 23 N = 32 N = 24
Based on localpay structurewithout adjustment
51% 43% 57% 41% 21%
Based on localpay structure withadjustments
20% 30% 26% 25% 21%
Home salaryconverted in hostcurrency
9% 5% 4% 9% 17%
Case by case 20% 19% 13% 19% 37%
It varies -- 3% -- 6% 4%
Based on localpay structurewith adjustments
70%Based on a higher localcompensation percentile thanlocals would get 30%
Based on a calculation toprotect/equalise/compare withemployee's previous (i.e. homeor hiring country) net pay
C O M P E N S AT I O N A P P R O A C HH O W D O Y O U E S T A B L I S H T H E B A S ES A L A R Y F O R A F O R E I G N E R O N A L O C A LP L U S A P P R O A C H ? — S I N G A P O R E
Source: Mercer 2014 Local Plus Surveys
C O P Y R I G H T M E R C E R 2 0 1 5
Tax and social securityassistance
Relocation assistance
Immigration assistance
One-time payments
Dependent educationHousing
Medical benefitTransportation
Ongoing payments(with phase-out option)
P R E V A L E N T “ P L U S ” E L E M E N T SS I N G A P O R E O N E - T I M E A N D P H A S E D - O U TC O M P O N E N T S
C O P Y R I G H T M E R C E R 2 0 1 5
Component Different from full expats Phase-out schedule Fixed schedule
Examples• Decrease of 10–70% of the
housing budget vs. full expatriateprovision.
• Full allowance for the first 6–12months only.
• “Less expensive” category ofhousing.
Examples• Three years: 100%, 50%,
25%.• Five years:
• One to three years: 100%.• Fourth year: 60%.• Fifth year: 30%.• Sixth year: 0%.
• Over three years: reduced by33%; or five years, by 20%.
Examples• Two years.• Three years.• Five years.
• Some can be subject toextension.
• Subject to criticality ofthe role.
• Mix between full expatriatebenefit and a decreased benefit.
• Mixed practices — phase outover time OR paid asongoing benefit.
Examples of phase-out:• Three years: 100%, 50%,
25%.
Examples• Two to three years.• Maximum five years.• Until the child has
finished education.
Source: Mercer 2014 Local Plus Surveys
P R E V A L E N T “ P L U S ” E L E M E N T SM A N A G I N G T R A N S I T I O N T O P U R E L O C A LS T A T U S — S I N G A P O R E
C O P Y R I G H T M E R C E R 2 0 1 5
E L E M E N T S N O T P R O V I D E D I N L O C A L P L U SP A C K A G E S F O R F O R E I G N E M P L O Y E E SS U M M A R Y F O R S I N G A P O R E
Source: Mercer 2014 Local Plus Surveys
C O P Y R I G H T M E R C E R 2 0 1 5
W H AT C O U L D G O W R O N G W I T H AL O C A L - P L U S A P P R O A C H ?
• The local-plus approach is introduced for the wrong reasons.• The “plus” is perceived as negotiable and/or the number of
exceptions grow.• The “plus” become permanent, making the local-plus package more
costly over the long term than anticipated.• Base salary becomes inflated.• The specificities of each host country could threaten the consistency of
the local-plus policy.• Communication challenge: strong resistance from assignees due to
negative perception of the local-plus package.
C O P Y R I G H T M E R C E R 2 0 1 5
D E S I G N I N G A L O C A L - P L U S P O L I C YC O N S I D E R A T I O N S
• One globally consistent policy.• Global principles and local flexibility.• Buyout with temporary “plus”.• As local as possible — limited “plus” elements.• Policy inclusions: Authorisation, cost analysis, compensation
approach, benefits, visa/work permits, health insurance, tax,financial planning, etc.
• Need for a decision tree for business leaders.• What other documentation is required?