making (some?) sense of the dod budget outlook … · guided multiple launch rocket system (gmlrs)...
TRANSCRIPT
4/23/2018
1
Making (some?) Sense of the DoD Budget
Outlook Conference 2018
0
U.S. Department of Defense
FISCAL YEAR 2019 BUDGET REQUEST
Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) / CFO
February 2018
1
National Security Strategy
• Respond to growing political, economic, military, information competitions
– Revisionist powers such as China and Russia
– Regional dictators such as Iran and North Korea
– Transnational threats, including jihadist terrorists and transnational criminal organizations
• Protect four vital national interests
– Protect the American people, homeland, and way of life
– Promote American prosperity
– Preserve peace through strength
– Advance American Influence
A Strategy of Principled Realism
4/23/2018
2
2
National Defense Strategy
• Compete, Deter, and Win to Preserve Peace through Strength
– Expand the competitive space leveraging all elements of national power
• Competition with China and Russia is central challenge
– Continue efforts to deter and counter North Korea, Iran, and terrorists
• Sustain U.S. influence and ensure favorable regional balances of power
– Build a more lethal, resilient, agile, and ready Joint Force
– Strengthen alliances and attract new partners
– Reform the Department’s business practices for greater performance and affordability
Great Power Competition is now the Primary Focus
FY 2019 National Defense Budget Request
(Dollars in Billions)
DoD – Military - Base Budget Request $617
DoD - Military - Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) 69
Total DoD Military (051) $686
Other National Defense (053/054) 30
Total National Defense (050) $716
• Budget driven by the National Defense Strategy
• $74 Billion (10% real growth) over DoD’s current CR levels
• Appreciative of the Congress enacting the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018
• We are committed to being good stewards of the taxpayers’ money
A Strategy Driven Budget
0%
5%
10%
15%
1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
DoD Outlays
Defense Outlays vs. Gross Domestic Product FY 1940 – FY 2019
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018* 2019
DoD Outlays % 4.5% 4.4% 4.1% 3.7% 3.4% 3.1% 3.1% 3.0% 3.1% 3.1%
40%1944
35.5%35%
30%
25%
20%
195311.3%
19688.6% 1985
5.7% 20104.5% 2019
3.1%
“America can afford survival” – Secretary Mattis
*Reflects annualized Continuing Resolution funding levels
4/23/2018
3
$470
$490
$510
$530
$570
$550
$590
$610
FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13
FY 2011 Enacted with Inflation
FY14 FY15
FY 10-11-12 Actuals
FY16 FY17
Original BCA Caps
FY18 FY19
Prior BBA Caps
Original BCA Caps
FY 2018 CR*
Prior BBA Caps
Defense Base Budget(Dollars in Billions)
-$406.5 billion
FY 2018 Request
FY 2018 BBA
*FY 2018 CR ($529B) + $15B of OCO-for -base requirements BCA = Budget Control Act BBA = Bipartisan Budget Acts (2011, 2013, and2018)
Begins Recovery from over $400 Billion of Lost Capability
FY 2019 Request
$0
$300
$200
$100
$500
$400
$600
$700
$800
FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY19
DoD Funding from FY 2010 Through FY 2023
FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
Numbers may not add due to rounding
FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
(Then Year Dollars in Billions)
(Discretionary BudgetAuthority)
524
580 606
691 687
645
560578 581
163 159 115
82 85 6382
528 528 495 496 497 521
6
5
Missile Defense*
617
686
69CR
Base Budget OCO/Other Budget
*Division B, P.L. 115-96, DoD Missile Defeat and Defense Enhancements Appropriations Act, 2018
202020
681 694 722
701 714727 742
20
530 707523
5983
612
Increases funding $74 Billion (10% real growth) over CR Levels
7
FY 2019 President’s Budget Military End Strength
1/ FY 2017 Actuals2/ FY 2018 PB Request. FY 2018 NDAA (P.L. 115-91) increases FY 2018 PB end strength by 9.5K (Army +8.5K (Active +7.5K Reserve +0.5K; Guard +0.5K); USMC +1.0K).
Builds Capacity & Lethality – FY 2019 +25.9K and +56.6K by FY 2023
Military Component FY 20171/ FY 20182/ FY 2019 FY 2023 Δ FY18-19 Δ FY18-23
Active Components (AC)
Army 476,245 476,000 487,500 495,500 +11,500 +19,500
Navy 323,944 327,900 335,400 344,800 +7,500 +16,900
Marine Corps 184,514 185,000 186,100 186,400 +1,100 +1,400
Air Force 322,787 325,100 329,100 338,800 +4,000 +13,700
TOTAL AC 1,307,490 1,314,000 1,338,100 1,365,500 +24,100 +51,500
Reserve Components (RC)
Army Reserve 194,318 199,000 199,500 200,000 +500 +1,000
Navy Reserve 57,824 59,000 59,100 59,200 +100 +200
Marine Corps Reserve 38,682 38,500 38,500 38,500 -- --
Air Force Reserve 68,798 69,800 70,000 70,200 +200 +400
Army National Guard 343,603 343,000 343,500 344,500 +500 +1,500
Air National Guard 105,670 106,600 107,100 108,600 +500 +2,000
TOTAL RC 808,895 815,900 817,700 821,000 +1,800 +5,100
Army AC + RC 1,014,166 1,018,000 1,030,500 1,040,000 +12,500 +22,000
Navy AC + RC 381,768 386,900 394,500 404,000 +7,600 +17,100
Marine Corps AC + RC 223,196 223,500 224,600 224,900 +1,100 +1,400
Air Force AC + RC 497,255 501,500 506,200 517,600 +4,700 +16,100
TOTAL AC + RC 2,116,385 2,129,900 2,155,800 2,186,500 +25,900 +56,600
4/23/2018
4
8
FY 2018 Request FY 2019 Request
Qty $B Qty $B
Aircraft
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (Air Force, Marine Corps, Navy) 70 10.8 77 10.7
KC-46 Tanker Replacement (Air Force) 15 3.1 15 3.0
F/A-18E/F Super Hornet (Navy) 14 1.3 24 2.0
AH-64E Apache Attack Helicopter (Army) 63 1.4 60 1.3
VH-92 Presidential Helicopter (Marine Corps) - 0.5 6 0.9
P-8A Poseidon (Navy) 7 1.6 10 2.2
CH-53K King Stallion (Marine Corps) 4 1.1 8 1.6
Shipbuilding
Virginia Class Submarine 2 5.5 2 7.4
DDG-51 Arleigh Burke Class Destroyers 2 4.0 3 6.0
Littoral Combat ships (LCS) 2 1.7 1 1.3
CVN-78 Class Aircraft Carrier 1 4.6 - 1.8
Fleet Replenishment Oiler (T-AO) 1 0.5 2 1.1
Towing, Salvage, and Rescue Ship (T-ATS) 1 0.1 1 0.1
Expeditionary Sea Base - - 1 0.7
Space
Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (Air Force) 3 1.9 5 2.0
Global Positioning System (GPS) (Air Force) - 1.1 - 1.5
Space Based Infrared System (Air Force) - 1.5 - 0.8
Numbers may not add due to rounding
Major Investments in the FY 2019 Budget(Base + OCO)
Includes Procurement and Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E)funding
FY 2018 Request FY2019 Request
Qty $B Qty $B
Preferred Munitions
Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) (Navy, Air Force) 34,529 0.9 43,594 1.2
Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS) (Army and Marine Corp) 6,474 0.9 9,733 1.2
Small Diameter Bomb I (SDB I) (Navy, Air Force) 6,852 0.3 6,826 0.3
Small Diameter Bomb II (SDB II) (Navy, Air Force) 550 0.3 1,260 0.4
Hellfire Missile (Army, Navy, Air Force) 7,664 0.7 7,045 0.6
Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile-Extended Range (Air Force) 360 0.5 360 0.6
Joint Air-to-Ground Missile (JAGM) (Army, Navy) 824 0.2 1,121 0.3
Ground Systems
Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (Army, Marine Corps, Air Force) 2,777 1.1 5,113 2.0
M-1 Abrams Tank Modifications/Upgrades (Army) 56 1.2 135 2.7
Amphibious Combat Vehicle (Marine Corps) 26 0.3 30 0.3
Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (Army) 107 0.6 197 0.8
Numbers may not add due to rounding
Major Investments in the FY 2019 Budget(Base + OCO)
Includes Procurement and Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E)funding
Numbers may not add due to rounding
Major Investments in the FY 2019 Budget(Base + OCO)
Includes Procurement and Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E)funding
Note: Aegis FY 2018 increased by $0.5 million and Qty of 16 SM-3 IIA (MDDE Amendment)Ground Based Midcourse FY 2018 increased by $0.6 million (MDDE Amendment, includes MILCON)
THAAD FY 2018 increased by $0.5 billion and Qty of 50 (MDDE Amendment)
PAC-3 MSE FY 2018 increase by $0.6 billion and Qty of 147 (MDDE Amendment)
FY 2018 Request FY 2019 Request
Qty $B Qty $B
Nuclear Deterrence
B-21 Long Range Strike Bomber (Air Force) - 2.0 - 2.3
Columbia Class Submarine - (Advance Procurement + RDT&E) (Navy) - 1.9 - 3.7
Long-Range Stand-Off (LRSO) Missile (Air Force) - 0.5 - 0.6
Ground Based Strategic Deterrent (GBSD) (Air Force) - 0.2 - 0.3
Missile Defense Programs
AEGIS Ballistic Missile Defense (SM-3) 54 2.1 43 1.7
Ground Based Midcourse Defense (Interceptors/Silos) -/10 1.9 4/10 2.1
Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Ballistic Missile Defense 84 1.3 82 1.1
Patriot Advanced Capability (PAC-3) Missile Segment Enhancement 240 1.1 240 1.1
4/23/2018
5
Investments in Technology Innovation
• Funds science and technology to further innovation ($13.7 billion)
• Supports DoD, academic, and industry partnerships with initiatives for:
– Hypersonics
– Autonomy
– Cyber
– Space
– Directed Energy
– Electronic Warfare
– Artificial Intelligence
Accelerates Delivery of New Capabilities
Major Investments to Support Europe and Asia
• Capability enhancements in Asia– Investment in Air and Space Superiority
– Procurement of one submarine Virginia Payload Module
– Increase procurement of the P-8A by 3
– Support for increased naval presence in the Pacific to include infrastructure investments
• Capability enhancements in Europe– Procurement of modernized equipment for the Army's second Armored
Brigade Combat Team (ABCT) equipment set in APS-2 (e.g. Abrams Tanks, Bradley Fighting Vehicles, and Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicles)
– Replenishment of wartime stockpiles of preferred and advanced munitions to increase lethality
– Expansion of European airbase infrastructure and equipment to support rapid expansion of airbases for high volume air combat operations
“Forward Force Maneuver and Posture Resilience” - NDS
Improving Warfighter Readiness
• Continues on the path to achieving full spectrum readiness across the Joint Force
• Advances the Department’s multi-pronged, multi-year approach to build a more lethal and ready force with targeted investments in training, equipment, maintenance, munitions, modernization and infrastructure.
• Supports Combatant Command exercises and engagements to increase joint training capabilities, reassure allies, and provide U.S. presence
FY 2019 Enhances Cross Cutting Readiness Investments
4/23/2018
6
Restore Service Readiness• Army:
– Supports increased home station training and additional high-end collective training exercises, resulting in 20 combat training center rotations in 2019
– Total Army end strength grows from 1,018K to 1,030.5K to fill critical personnel gaps and grow force structure
• Navy:– Ship Depot Maintenance and Aviation Readiness remain the top two readiness recovering priorities;
conducting schedule maintenance and reducingbacklog– Ship maintenance efforts include improvements in the planning process and continuing to build
workforce capacity in the Naval Shipyards– Aviation Readiness accounts include increases in engineering and program-related logistics to speed
the repair process and also increases in the workforce at Aviation Depots• Marine Corps:
– Grows an additional 1,100 Marines and fully funds Marine Corps operating forces and associated maintenance– Invests in information warfare, long-range precision fires, air defense, and enhanced maneuver capabilities
• Air Force:– Invests in additional military end strength to fill critical gaps in pilot, cyber, maintainer, and Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance
(ISR) career fields– Builds on the progress made in PB 2018 to restore the readiness of the force, increase lethality, and cost-effectively modernize while also
moving to multi-domain warfare• USSOCOM:
– Funds efforts to mitigate capacity readiness challenges in command and control, cyber, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR), precision strike munitions, and air and maritime mobility
– Specific investments made to increase contracted ISR orbits and improve capability, enhance aircraft contractor logistical support, and accelerate transition to an all A/MC-130J model fleet
FY 2019 Budget Continues Investment in Readiness Recovery
FY 2019 budget provides a competitive compensation package that reflects the unique demands and sacrifices of U.S. service members
• Provide 2.6% military pay raise – largest increase in 9 years
• Includes NO compensation cost share reforms in FY 2019 (e.g., no increases in pharmacy co-pays)
• Instead, pursues efforts focused on internal business process improvements and structural changes to find greater efficiencies (e.g., modernize military health care system to an integrated system)
• Sustains family support initiatives – invests more than $8 billion
– Spousal/community support to include offices to prevent and respond to sexual assault and domestic/child abuse and neglect
– Child care for 1 million children
– Counseling support (Financial Readiness; Military OneSource, etc.)
– DoD Dependent Schools educating over 78K students
– Commissary Operations at 237 stores
Keeping Faith With Service Members and Families
Largest Military Pay Raise in 9 years
• Increases facilities investment by 7% (+$0.7B) above the FY 2018 base budget request of $9.8B (FY 2019: $10.5B)
– Operational and training facilities (airfield improvements, training ranges, etc.) to improve readiness
– Maintenance and productions facilities (e.g., missile assembly building and high explosives magazine) to improve readiness
– Recapitalization of facilities in poor and failing condition
– Improved Quality-of-Life for Service Members and their families (schools, barracks, medical facilities, etc.)
• Concentrates efforts on ensuring the basing infrastructure is ideally sized to increase the lethality of U.S. forces while minimizing the cost of maintaining unneeded capacity, which diverts resources from critical readiness and modernization requirements
Facilities Investment
4/23/2018
7
Reforming DoD’s Business Operations• Deputy Secretary Shanahan is leading effort to reform DoD’s business operations and reapply
those savings to improve readiness and to increase the lethality and capacity of the military
• Focus is on using shared, centralized services throughout DoD with the goal of using best practices to maximize effectiveness; this is a multiyear effort focused on:
Healthcare
Human Resources
Contracted Goods & Services
Community Services
– Information Technology (IT)
– Real Property
– Financial Management
– Logistics and Supply Chain
– Testing and Evaluation
• The FY 2019 Budget reflects continued savings from ongoing reforms initiatives such as defense travel modernization and the management headquarters 25% reduction
• DoD has Implemented the FY 2017 NDAA Reforms:
– Reorganizing the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics into two new Under Secretaries of Defense
– Appointing a Chief Management Officer to manage the business operations of DoD
– Elevating Cyber Command
“Business reform is the foundation of our competitive edge”– Secretary Mattis
• Operation FREEDOM’S SENTINEL (Afghanistan) and Theater Posture 46.3– Maintains increased in-country U.S. presence to continue the President’s South Asia strategy
– Funds training and equipping of Afghan security forces, including support for the Afghan Air Force and Special Security Forces ($5.2 billion)
– Includes other theater-wide support requirements and costs, including the replenishment,replacement, and repair of equipment destroyed, damaged, or worn out due to prolongeduse in combat operations
• Operation INHERENT RESOLVE (Iraq and Syria) 15.3– Supports ongoing operations against ISIS, including training and equipping of Iraqi Security
Forces and vetted Syrian opposition forces ($1.4 billion)
– Funds the replacement of munitions, both expended and projected
• European Deterrence Initiative (EDI) 6.5– Enhances capability and posture resiliency to improve deterrence and U.S. warfighting
effectiveness in Europe
– Includes funding for Ukraine to build capacity to conduct internal defense operations to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity ($200 million)
0.9• Security Cooperation (SC)– Builds partner capacity to conduct counterterrorism, crisis response, and other SC missions
through training, equipping, and other activities
TOTAL OCO REQUEST 69.0
FY 2019 Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO)(Dollars in Billions)
FY 2019 Budget Summary
• Driven by the National Defense Strategy
• Improves the lethality and capability of the Joint Force
• Begins reforming DoD’s business operations by using best practices to centralize common services
• Needs Congress to pass this budget on time – end Continuing Resolutions
“This national defense strategy will guide all our actions, aligning thedepartment's three lines of effort to gain synergies. But we recognize nostrategy can long survive without necessary funding and the stable,predictable budgets required to defend America in the modern age.”
– Secretary Mattis
4/23/2018
8
FY 2019 Total Base and OCO Funding
Army$182.0 B,
27%
Navy$194.1 B,
28%
Air Force$194.2 B,
28%
Defense Wide
$115.8 B, 17%
FY 2019 Request: $686.1 billion
By Appropriation Title By Military Department
RDT&E,$92.4 B,
14%
Military Construction and Family Housing, Other
$12.9 B, 2%
Procurement,$144.3 B,
21%
Military Personnel,$152.9 B,
22%
O&M,$283.5 B,
41%
Numbers may not add due to rounding
For More Information
• Visit the website for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) at
– www.budget.mil
– Download the Department of Defense’s FY 2019 Budget Request
Compete, Deter, and Win:
To address the current threats, the Army must restore warfighting readiness, modernize capabilities, and reform our institutional processes to innovate faster than near‐peer adversaries with global ambitions.
Globally Engaged and Responsive
Building a more Lethal, Agile, and Capable ArmyWhere we areDeployed and Committed: 186KIn more than 140 countriesAcross 6 continentsArmy SOF: 4K deployed in 80 countriesWorldwide Support to CT Operations
Today’s Environment Long-term strategic competition with
revisionist powers Rogue regimes destabilize regions and
seek WMD capability. Terrorists and malicious non-state
actors cause global disruption Rapid technological advancements are
changing the character of war
Strategic Approach Build Readiness for major combat
operations Modernize key capabilities Establish force posture to deter and
provide strategic flexibility Deepen Joint and Allied
Interoperability Reform Institutional Processes for
greater performance.
4/23/2018
9
$138$127
$126* $123* $128* $130*$139* $148*
$67
$50
$36$28 $23
$29
$34
$205
$177
$162$151 $151
$159$169
$30
$182
FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19
Budget Trends
RequestActuals
The FY 2019 Budget Builds upon the Readiness Improvements Started in FY 2017
Overseas Contingency Funding (OCO)
Base Actuals
Base Funding
Pending Request
FY 2012 – FY 2019($B)Base and OCO
Request w/ Amendment
FY 12 FY 13
* Includes OCO for Basepurposes
FY14: $3.1B OCO for Base Transfer
FY15: $0.85B OCO for Base Transfer
FY16: $2.7B OCO for Base Transfer
FY17: $6.0B OCO for Base Transfer
FY18: $0.2B OCO for Base Transfer
FY19: $5.0B OCO for Base Transfer
FY 2019 Budget ThemesThe Army’s FY 2019 Budget will help to ensure the Army increases our overmatch capability and remains the world’s preeminent ground fighting force through investments in current and future readiness to deter adversaries and, when necessary, fight and win.
U.S. and Polish Soldiers conduct training: Poland
Defeat Enemies in Ongoing Conflicts
Increase Warfighter Readiness
Increase Army’s Capacity
Invest in Army Modernization Priorities
Increase Lethality and Combined Arms Overmatch
Improve Rapid Response Readiness
Invest in Critical Infrastructure
Increase Global Security through Allies and Partners
Reform Army Processes
Support Soldiers, Civilians and their Families
MILPER,$60.6
MILCON,$2.0
RDA,$32.0
O&M,$52.5
Other,$1.2
$148.4B
FY 2019 Budget Request(Base Funding Program)
The Army’s topline base funding grew by 7% from the total FY18 budget request
The FY19 base budget funds the Army’s readiness requirements and the higher end strength:
Military Personnel 4.5% ▲
Operations & Maintenance 6.1%▲
Procurement/RDTE (RDA) 14.3%▲
$B FY17Actuals
FY18Request
FY19Request
Military Personnel 55.3 58.0 60.6
Operation and Maintenance 1 46.8 49.5 52.5
Procurement/RDTE 26.4 28.0 32.0
Military Construction/Family Housing/BRAC 1.6 2.3 2.0
Other Base (CAMD/AWCF/ANC) 0.9 1.2 1.2
Totals 131.12 138.93 148.44
Base Request
O&M Civilian Pay,$14.5
Numbers may not add due to rounding
Other Base: Chemical Agent and Munitions Destruction, Army Working Capital Fund, and Arlington National Cemetery 1: Includes Environmental Restoration Account (ERA) funding2: Includes $6.0B in OCO for Base purposes3: Includes $0.9B Missile Defeat and Defense Enhancement, $0.6B Hurricane Supplemental and $0.2B OCO for Base purposes4. Includes $5.0B in OCO for Base purposes
4/23/2018
10
Military End Strength
6
Supports a Total Army end strength of 1,030,500 Soldiers
Increases end strength to continue rebuilding warfighting readiness and improving capability and lethality
Grows Active Guard Reserve (AGR) full-time support for the Army National Guard and the Army Reserve
U.S. Soldiers participating in Exercise Noble Partner: Republic of Georgia
1: Authorized in the FY 2018 National Defense Authorization Act, Public Law No: 115‐91
ComponentFY17
ActualsFY18
BudgetedFY18
AuthorizedFY19
Request
Regular Army 476,245 476,000 483,500 487,500
Army National Guard 343,603 343,000 343,500 343,500
Army Reserve 194,318 199,000 199,500 199,500
Totals 1,014,166 1,018,000 1,026,5001 1,030,500
Military Personnel
Requested Rate Increases (Effective 1 Jan 19) FY19
Basic PayBasic Allowance for
Housing Basic Allowance for
Subsistence
2.6%
2.9%
3.4%
Compensates 1,030,500 end strength, including adjustments for pay, subsistence, housing allowances; continues to address retirement compensation
Increases funding for Reserve Component Soldiers on active duty supporting missions
Provides incentives to recruit and retain theAll-Volunteer Force; includes recruiting andretention bonuses and education benefits
U.S. Soldiers conduct Expert Field Medical Badge training: Republic of Korea
Numbers may not add due to rounding
1: Includes $0.3B in OCO for Base purposes
$BFY17
ActualsFY18
RequestFY19
Request
Regular Army 39.7 41.5 43.7
Army National Guard 8.1 8.4 8.7
Army Reserve 4.5 4.8 5.0
Medicare Eligible Ret Health Care Fund 3.0 3.3 3.2
Totals1
55.3 58.0 60.6
Operation and Maintenance (Regular Army)
$ BF Y 1 7
A c t u a l sF Y 1 8
R e q u e s tF Y 1 9
R e q u e s tR e g u l a r A r m y ( O M A ) 3 7 . 1 1 3 9 . 0 2 4 2 . 0 3
Numbers may not add due to rounding
1: Includes $3.6B in OCO for Base purposes2: Includes $20.1M in Hurricane Supplemental 3: Includes $5.0B in OCO for Base purposes
30
Trains the Force Resources 20 Combat Training Center rotations - 16 Regular Army and 4
ARNG Resources three additional Security Force Assistance Brigades (SFABs).
Operates the ForceImproves global posture; increased capacity (convert ABCT from IBCT)Focuses attention on pre-positioning and rotations in the Pacific and Europe
Sustains the Force Prioritizes rapid global response and force projection readiness Improves the industrial base and ammunition management
M777A2 Howitzer Training
Installation/Enterprise Support Maintains commitment to Family and Soldier programs and installation support Improves facility sustainment; continues to invest in restoration and modernization
4/23/2018
11
Operation and Maintenance (Reserve Components)
Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard Strengthens readiness through unit specific training Integrates into Global Army Missions Continues support to Family Programs Improves facility sustainment and restoration and
modernization
Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve Creates new Ready Force units at Platoon (+) readiness level Provides capability for early enablers to deploy in 0-90 days Supports 79 functional and multifunctional support
brigades Funds base operations for 3 installations and
707 Reserve centers
Ohio Army National Guard Soldiers conduct training
$BFY17 1
ActualsFY18 2
RequestFY19
RequestArmy National Guard (OMNG) Army Reserve (OMAR)
6.92.7
7.42.9
7.42.9
U.S. Army Reserve Soldiers: Operation Cold Steel II
31
Numbers may not add due to rounding
1: Includes OCO for Base purposes for ARNG: $140M; USAR: $14M 2: Includes Hurricane Supplemental for ARNG: $55M, USAR: $12M
Modernization Summary
$32.1 BCapability Portfolios Fills critical capability gaps and improve lethality in
munitions, and air and ground combat platforms
Increases modernization of Abrams, Bradley, Stryker, and Paladin combat vehicles
Increases procurement of critical missiles, rockets, and 155-mm artillery projectiles
Accelerates procurement of Joint Battle Command –Platform (JBC-P)
RDT&E increases in: Mobile Protected Firepower, Combat Vehicle Prototyping, Long Range Precision Fires, Synthetic Training Environment and Short Range
ModernizationPriorities1. Long‐Range Precision Fires2. Next Generation Combat Vehicles3. Future Vertical Lift4. Army Network5. Air and Missile Defense6. Soldier Lethality
Numbers may not add due to rounding
1: Includes $1.7B in OCO for Base purposes2: Includes FY18 Amendment for Missile Defense Defeat Enhancement (MDDE) and $.2B in OCO for Base purposes
Air Missile Defense 9%
Ammunition 5%
Aviation16%
Combat Service
Support 7%
Fire SupportGround
Maneuver
Intelligence 2%
Mission Command
12%
Other11%
S&T 8%Soldier4%
$BFY17
ActualsFY18
RequestFY19
Request
Procurement TotalRDT&E Total
17.98.6
18.59.4
21.910.2
Totals 26.51 27.9 2 32.1
8%Air Defense (M-SHORAD). 18%
Procurement Summary $21.9 B
Capability Portfolios
Sustains Apache, Blackhawk and Chinook aircraftremanufacture and new builds
Accelerates Multiple Launch Rocket Systems (MLRS) launcher modernization and maximizesprocurement of key munitions Patriot Missile Segment Enhancement (MSE) missiles, GuidedMLRS rockets, and Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS)
Accelerates modernization of Abrams, Bradley and Stryker fleets with mobility and lethality upgrades
Sustains procurement of Paladin Integrated Management (PIM) and Joint Light Tactical Vehicle for Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP)
Increases procurement of Joint Battle Command – Platform (JBC-P), baselining the force of the mounted mission command
Numbers may not add due to rounding
1: Includes $1.7B in OCO for Base purposes
Air Missile Defense8%
Ammunition 7%
Aviation 19%
Combat Service
Support10%Fire Support
9%
Maneuver 21%
2: Includes FY18 Amendment for Missile Defense Defeat Enhancement (MDDE) and $.2B in OCO for Base purposes Intelligence2%
Ground
Mission Command
13%
Other 6% Soldier 5%$B
FY17Actuals
FY18Request
FY19Request
Aircraft 4.9 4.2 3.8Missiles 2.4 3.6 3.4Weapons & Tracked Combat Vehicles (WTCV) 2.4 2.4 4.5Ammunition 2.0 1.9 2.2Other Procurement 6.2 6.5 8.0
Totals 17.91 18.62 21.9
4/23/2018
12
Select Procurement Quantities(Base and OCO)
Apache
Paladin
JLTV
Abrams
Bradley
Chinook
Black Hawk
GMLRS AMPV
ProgramQuantities
FY18 FY19
AH‐64E Apache Remanufacture 50 48
AH‐64E Apache New Build 13 12
UH‐60M Black Hawk 48 50
CH‐47 Chinook 6 7
Abrams Upgrade 56 135
Bradley Upgrade/MOD 195 210
Armored Multi‐Purpose Vehicle (AMPV) 107 197
Paladin Integrated Management (PIM) 71 36
Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) 2,498 3,390
Guided MLRS Rocket (GMLRS) 6,084 9,450
MSE Missile 240 240
ATACMS Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) 122 404
Javelin 572 784
155mm Artillery Projectile 16,573 148,287
Joint Battle Command ‐ Platform (JBC‐P) 16,552 26,355
RDT&E Summary $10.2 B Capability Portfolios
$B
FY17
Actuals
FY18
Request
FY19
RequestBasic ResearchApplied Research Advanced Technology Dev.
0.5
1.21.4
0.4
0.91.12
0.4
0.91.0
S&T Subtotal 3.1 2.4 2.3Demonstration/Validation 0.6 0.9 1.3Engineering Manufacturing Dev. 2.3 3.0 3.2
Testing & Management Support 1.4 1.3 1.3Operational System Development 1.3 1.9 1.9
Totals 8.6 1 9.4 10.2Numbers may not add due to rounding
1: Includes $70M in OCO for Base purposes2: Includes FY18 Amendment for Missile Defense Defeat Enhancement (MDDE)
Air Missile Defense11%
Ammunition 1%
Aviation8%
Combat Service
Support2%
Fire Support
5%
Ground Maneuver
13%Intelligence3%Mission Command9%
Other 20%
S&T26%
Soldier 3%
Comprehensive realignment of the Science and Technology (S&T) portfolio towards the Army’s priorities (Realigned $234M in FY19)
Increases investments in Mobile Protected Firepower, Combat Vehicle Prototyping, Long Range Precision Fires,Synthetic Training Environment, Short Range Air Defense (M-SHORAD), and Future Tactical Unmanned AircraftSystems (FTUAS)
Continues Combat Vehicle Improvement Programs, Soldier Night Vision Devices, and Electronic Warfare Development to increase lethality and maintain combat arms overmatch
Facilities
Supports environmental remediation actions at sites closed during prior BRAC rounds.
Numbers may not add due to rounding
1: Includes $0.5B Hurricane supplemental
These projects recapitalize poor and failing facilities as well as building new facilities that meet unit demand. Provides construction of new facilities across all three components.
Regular Army: 19 projects, $1,012M
Army National Guard: 8 projects, $180M
Army Reserve: 2 projects, $65M
Supports U.S. and overseas Army Family Housing operation and maintenance, leases, and construction (6 projects, $331M)
$M FY17 Actuals FY18 Request FY19 RequestMilitary Construction 1,005 1,7241 1,257Army Family Housing 480 529 707Base Realignment and Closure 133 58 63
Totals 1,618 2,311 2,027
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hanger, Fort Carson
4/23/2018
13
Cemeterial Expenses, Army (Arlington National Cemetery)
Provides for operation, maintenance, infrastructure revitalization and construction at Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, Virginia, and the Soldiers’ and Airmen’s Home National Cemetery in Washington,D.C.
ANC is the final resting place for Service Members, Veterans, and their Families; as an active cemetery, hosts more than 7,000 burialsannually
Chemical Agent and Munitions Destruction (DoD Program)
Provides for destruction of US inventory of lethal chemical agents and munitions as outlined in the Chemical Weapons Convention
Chemical Agent-Destruction continues at Blue Grass and Pueblo Pilot Plants
Continues the chemical stockpile preparednessprogram
Army Working Capital Fund
Provides for the acquisition of secondary items for Army Prepositioned Stocks
Sustains industrial base equipment required formobilization
Other Base Accounts
$M FY17 Actuals FY18 Request FY19 RequestArmy National Cemetery and Construction 71 71 71Chemical Agent and Munitions Destruction 651 962 994Army Working CapitalFund 197 84 159
Arlington National Cemetery
Numbers may not add due to rounding
Overseas Contingency Operations
OCO Request$33.7B
Appropriation ($M)FY17
ActualsFY18
RequestFY19
RequestMilitary Personnel (MILPERS) 2,287 2,893 3,161Operation & Maintenance(O&M) 15,925 17,132 18,363 5
Research, Development, &Acquisition (RDA) 3,610 2,692 4 5,289Military Construction, Army (MCA) 30 140 261Working Capital Fund(AWCF) 48 3 50 7
Army Subtotal 21,900 22,907 27,081Counter-Islamic State of Iraq and Syria Train and Equip Fund 1 1,438 1,769 1,400
Afghan Security Forces Fund 4,263 4,938 5,199
Iraq Train & Equip Fund 290 - -
Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund 2 88 - -
Passthrough / Transfer Accounts Subtotal 6,079 6,707 6,599Totals 27,979 29,614 33,680
Operation INHERENT RESOLVE (Iraq)
European Deterrence Initiative (Europe)
Afghan Security Forces Fund
Counter-ISIS Train & Equip Fund
Numbers may not add due to rounding
1: The Iraq and Syria Train & Equip Funds were combined into a single Counter‐ISIS Train & Equip fund in FY172: The Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat mission has been assumed by a new DOD organization for FY17 and beyond. Partial FY16 and FY17 JIEDDF funding information can be found in the DOD Budget Materials.3: Army Working Capital FY17 numbers reflect enacted appropriations 4: Does not include $0.2B OCO for Basepurposes.5: Does not include $5.0B OCO for Basepurposes
Operation FREEDOM’S SENTINEL (Afghanistan; Horn of Africa) includes Operation Spartan Shield(CENTCOM)
MILPERS 9%
O&M 54%
RDA 16%
Pass‐Through 20%
MILCON/AWCF 1%
Other Topics and Concerns
Significant Reforms in DoD Procurement, Especially For The Army
Recruiting and Retention
Pilot Shortages
Army Strategies That May Effect A Family of Military Shelters
Concerns for The DoD Budget of 2020 (currently being drafted)
4/23/2018
14
Contact Information
Ron HoulePresident
Pivot Step Consultants, [email protected]
914‐806‐3775