mahindra sanyo special steel pvt ltd, khopoli , maharashtra...mahindra sanyo electrical arc furnace...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Mahindra Sanyo Special Steel Pvt Ltd,
Khopoli , Maharashtra
CII - 19th National Award for
"EXCELLENCE IN ENERGY MANAGEMENT 2018”
Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
2
Company Profile
Mahindra Sanyo Special Steel Pvt. Ltd (MSSSPL), following a joint venture between Mahindra & Mahindra (29%), Sanyo Special Steel Co., Ltd (51%) and Mitsui & Co., Ltd (20%). • Location : Khopoli, Maharashtra, India• Established : 1962• Employees : ~2400• Business : Manufacturing & sales of special
steel products• Products : As-cast Ingots, CC-rolled products,
rolled & ingot-forged bars, rings
Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
Electric Arc Furnace
Ladle Furnace
Vacuum Degassing
ContinuousCasting
Ingot Casting(Bottom pouring) Forging
Blooming Mill
Bar Mill
Continuous Mill
Heat TreatmentFurnaces
QuenchingTank
StraighteningMachine
Peeling
Inspection
Ring Plant
Dispatch
New Delhi
Kolkata
Chennai
Pune
Mumbai
Khopoli
3
1.a. Specific Energy Consumption (SEC) Reduction
Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
There Is Continuous Improvement In Specific Energy Consumption.
23 % reduction in total Energy Consumption
4
1.b. Specific Energy Consumption (SEC) Reduction
Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
Reduction in Specific Power Consumption from 997 to 887 KWH/MTcs• Electrode Regulation in Arc Furnace• Better Ladle Management in Steel
Melting Shop• Reduction in Cycle Time at Ladle
Furnace Furnace• Heat Treatment Furnace Revamping • Energy Efficient Equipment• Best practices at all shops
Reduction in Specific Fuel Consumption from 121 to 87 Ltrs/MTcs
• Oxy- Fuel technology for reheating Furnaces
• Replacement of Recuperator • Efficient Ladle circulation for heat
optimization• Improvement in planning to
optimize heat sequence
5
2.a. National & Global Benchmarking Specific Energy Consumption at Steel Melting Shop [KWH/MT]
Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
Special Steel BENCHMARK Asia/Pacific
Electrical Arc Furnace = 451 KWH/MT
Ladle Furnace = 64 KWH/MT
Mahindra Sanyo Electrical Arc Furnace = 459 KWH/MT
Ladle Furnace = 113 KWH/MT**Tool & Die (High Alloy)steel production % higher
Road Map to Achieve Global /National Benchmarking : Carbon- Oxygen Injector for ARC Furnace – Reduction in EAF Power by 40 KWH/MT
6
3.a. Energy Saving Projects Implemented in FY 2015-16
*Note : Savings mentioned for F 16 includes projects, suggestions, EnMS process controls and best practices .
Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
S.N Name of Project (Electrical Energy)
Annual Electrical Saving achieved (KWH Mio)
Total annual saving (Rs Mio)
Investment Made (Rs Mio)
Tons of CO2 Mitigated (Tons CO2)
Paybacks (Year)
1 Impeller Trimming Cold Well Pump House 0.1 0.8 0.01 120 Immediate
2 LF Cycle time reduction 2.8 19.5 0 2790 Immediate
3Electrode Regulation SMS and effect of scrap Mix , delays & operational factors. 3.1 22 0 3140 Immediate
4 Pipeline modification from Scale pit pump house 0.1 0.8 0 121 Immediate
5 HTFS Power reduction through furnace revamping 0.1 0.5 0.1 70 26 Modification of HT Breaker 0 0 0.05 5 19
7Replacement of incandescent lights . 145 Nos 40 W lights replaced with T5 Lights 0.004 0.03 0.15 4 57Total 6.2 43.63 0.31 6250
S.N Name of Project (Thermal Energy) Annual Thermal Saving achieved (KL)
Total annual saving (Rs Mio)
Invest Made (Rs Mio)
Tons of CO2 Mitigated (Tons CO2)
Paybacks (year)
1 Oxy Fuel for BLM Furnaces no. 5 & 6 445 12.02 5.77 1188 0.41
Total 445 12.02 5.77 1188 0.41
Electrical Energy Savings :• 7.1 Mio KWH• 49.7 Mio Rs• 5822 Tons CO2
Thermal Energy Savings :• 1437 KL • 31.12 Mio Rs• 4267 Tons CO2
Renewable Energy (Wind+ Solar + RPO) • 5.8% of
total power
7
3.b. Energy Saving Projects Implemented in FY 2016-17
*Note : Savings mentioned for F 17 includes projects, suggestions, EnMS process controls and best practices . Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
S.N Name of Project (Electrical Energy)
Annual Electrical Saving achieved (KWH Mio)
Total annual saving (Rs Mio)
Investment Made (Rs Mio)
Tons of CO2 Mitigated (Tons CO2)
Paybacks (Months)
1Optimization of Scrap Mix, Early Foaming started through use of Lump coke in EAF 2.08 15.0 0 1700 Immediate
2LF Cycle time reduction & Better insulation practice to avoid Temp. drop after Vacuum Degassing 0.96 6.92 0 787 Immediate
3HTFS Furnace Revamping & Refractory work
0.6 4.29 1.25 490 4
4Installation of Energy Efficient Equipment like Transformer, LED Light , Star rated AC’S, IE3 Motors 0.04 0.27 1.02 35 22
5 KAIZENS, Suggestion, Best Practices 0.03 0.21 0 25 Immediate
Total 3.7 26.0 2.27 3030
S.N Name of Project (Thermal Energy) Annual Thermal Saving achieved (KL)
Total annual saving (Rs Mio)
Invest Made (Rs Mio)
Tons of CO2 Mitigated (Tons CO2)
Paybacks (Months)
1
Replacement of Old Manifold with new result in Delay reduction, Saving in Oil consumption at FRG Shop
263 6.05 2.50 800 5
2Modification of Burner Block in Furnace at FRG shop
176 4.04 0.25 530 1
Total 439 10.09 2.75 1330
Electrical Energy Savings :• 3.7 Mio KWH• 26.0 Mio Rs• 3030 Tons CO2
Thermal Energy Savings :• 439 KL • 10.09 Mio Rs• 1330 Tons CO2
Renewable Energy (Wind+ Solar) • 6.95% of total
power
8
3.c. Energy Saving Projects Implemented in FY 2017-18
*Note : Savings mentioned for F 18 includes projects, suggestions, EnMS process controls and best practices .
Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
S.N Name of Project (Electrical Energy)
Annual Electrical Saving achieved (KWH Mio)
Total annual saving (Rs Mio)
Investment Made (Rs Mio)
Tons of CO2 Mitigated (Tons CO2)
Paybacks (Months)
1
Reduction in cycle time for LF, Use of Mark-7 thermocouple instead of Mark-3, Standardization of Alloy Addition at Ladle furnace
1.31 8.96 0 1073 0
2Revamping of GCT of Fume extraction system of Primary FES of ARC furnace
0.946.46 4.0 773 7
3 Blooming Mill & Forge shop repairing 0.39 2.74 1.40 319 6
4Cycle time reduction of 5 grades of Heat treatment
0.16 1.10 0 132 0
5KAIZENS, Suggestion, Best Practices, Efficient Operation
1.12 7.67 0 918 0
6Installation of Motion sensor & Light Detective relay for Street Light 0.17 1.14 0.03 136 0
Total 4.09 28.07 5.43 3351 2
Electrical Energy Savings :• 4.09 Mio KWH• 28.07 Mio Rs• 3351 Tons CO2
Renewable Energy & REC (Wind+ Solar) • 4.73 % of
total power
Cumulative Saving from FY 16 to FY 18Electricity MIO Kwh 14.89
Fuel KL 1876
T-CO2 MT 40952
Cost Mio Rs. 145
9
3. d. Energy Projects FY 2019-23
Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
Sl.No. Project Description FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 Scope- (Kg CO2-e
/ MT )Impact
1 13
2 33
2
Conversion of Reheating Furnaces from Furnace Oil to NG
(20 T WHF BAR Mill, 40 T WHF BLM Mill, 7 & 8 Chamber
Furnace BLM, Ladle Preheating)
1 33
4 Waste Heat Recovery for Hot flue Gas from Arc Furnace 2 33
5 Digital regulation system for both Ladle Furnace
6 Transformer Replacement of both Ladle Furnace
7
Conversion of Reheating Furnaces from Furnace Oil to NG
( Chamber Furnace BLM, Boiler, Forge Shop Furnaces, CC
Tundish heating)
1 41
1 5
2 16
1 5
2 16
1 1
2 16
1 Installation of 4 MW Solar Roof Top Panel 2 20
2 Solar Power through Open Access_6 MW 2 25
3 Wind Power through Open Access 2 110
Conversion of Heat Treatment 4 Nos. of Annealing furnace
from Electrical to NG heating8
Carbon-Oxygen Injector for Electric Arc Furnace1
2 8
Renewable Energy
9
10 Conversion of all CC pit from Electrical to NG heating
Conversion of Heat Treatment 5 Nos.of Annealing , 2 Nos.
of Quenching furnaceS from Electrical to NG heating
10Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
4 . a. Bloom uniform heating in WHFBy increasing bloom exposure to heat for 250X200 sections
Observation & Possible cause for difficulties in rolling from 250X200 Bloom
Observation :
After completion of re-heating there was more
temperature difference (>40°C ) between top bottom
of Bloom
Effect of this temperature difference
a. Bending of Bloom during rolling was observed
due to reduction force
b. Delay in completion of rolling process
c. Dimension variation due to delay in rolling
process
d. Chances of Rolling defect like shearing
e. More damage of entry guide boxes
11Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
Innovation Details
No Uniform
Temperature for
250X200 Bloom –
Temperature
difference between
top & bottom is
>40°C
Root Cause Action Taken
Maximum Traverse stroke design– 360 mm- This stroke is used for 250X200 & 200X180 Blooms
Increase Bloom to Bloom gap by 20 mm
for 250X200
Installed 1 extra proxy sensor at 190 mm traverse stroke – Mid way 360 mm
Bloom to Bloom Gap design – 110 mm for 250X200 & 160 mm for 200X180
Temperature difference is more for 250X200
Bloom after re-heating – due to less surface
exposure of Bloom- as Bloom to Bloom gap is
less
Proxy is connected to selector switch in PLC & design a new program in PLC
360 mm traverse stroke program is split into 2 consecutive stroke of 190 mm – Result in increase in traverse stroke from 360 to 380 mm (increase gap by 20 mm)
12Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
4 a. Bloom uniform heating in WHFBy increasing bloom exposure to heat for 250X200 sections
Before:
250X200 250X200 250X200250X200
110 110 110
250X200
After:
250X200 250X200
130 130
❖ Surface exposure of Bloom to radiation has increased after implementation of this project – by increasing gap by 20 mm between Blooms
❖ Shadow effect is eliminated – result in uniform heating of Bloom❖ Temperature difference is <20 ° C
Heat radiation
Heat radiation
Heat radiation
Heat radiation
Heat radiation
13
Benefits
Production rate for 60-75 mm dia
Before-Nov’17
10 T/Hr
After-Nov’17
Saving from Dec’17
11.8 T/Hr
1. Productivity Increase with improvement in Quality
2. Bending of Bloom issue are eliminated
3. Reduction in rolling defect4. Reduction in rolling
processing delay 5. Charge to Discharge time
decrease from 4 to 3.7 hrs
8.5 T/Hr 9.4 T/Hr
40.7 Ltrs/MT
37.5 Ltrs/MT
3.2 Ltrs/MT
16 KL/Month
Net Saving : MiO Rs. / Month
0.55
Net Saving : MiO Rs. / Year 6.6
Production rate for 50-60 mm dia
Oil consumption at Walking Hearth
Furnace
Project Implemented
with no
INVESTMENT
14
Materials
ManMethod
VD Problem LF Breaker Breakdown
Desulphurization time more due to Lime Hopper
Wire Feeder
Problem Vessel Car
Breakdown
Sulphur Wire Break
Ladle Side
gate failure
Ladle Porous Plug Jam
Wrong Addition
Sop not followed
High
Chromium
Heats
Start Temperature LowPit Side Delay
High LF Power
Machine
100T Crane
Break down
Wrong Chemistry
reference written
Variations in grade
compositions
Inadequate Ladle
heating
Skill
Dependent
Ladle puncture
Temperature Lance Variation
Unidentified scrap in
charging
Improper
Sampling
Continuous
CC heat / BP
heat
Out of Circulation
Ladle
Special Heat
processing
Power
Failure
Missing Ladle Sequence
Temperature Variation
Heat Return
Tapping Addition
variation
Identify possible causes: For High LF Power
4. Innovation Projectsb. Ladle Furnace Specific Power Consumption Reduction
Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
15Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
Innovation Details
High LF Power
Root Cause Action Taken
Start Temperature Low -Insufficient ladle heating
Temperature variations _Ladle Circulation
Missing Ladle Sequence (Gap Ladle) –
Temperature variation
Desulphurization time more
Ladle Heating time increased
3 Ladle circulation instead of 4
Mark 7 temperature tips are in use against Mark 3 for better accuracy in temperature measurement.
New lime hopper installed on LF platform
16
Benefits
Ladle Power Consumption
Before-Nov’17
120 KWH/MT
After -Nov’17
Saving from Dec’17
103 KWH/MT
17 KWH/MT
1.9 MiO Rs./Month
6.2 Ltrs/MT
8 Ltrs/MT
-1.8 Ltrs/MT
-0.8 MiO Rs./Month
0.92 Kg/MT
0.74 Kg/MT
0.18 Kg/MT
1.9 MiO Rs./Month
Net Saving : MiO Rs. /Month : 3 Net Saving : MiO Rs. /Year : 36
Oil Consumption _Ladle preheating
Electrode Consumption at Ladle Furnace
17
Observation for Possible cause
Charge
preparation
Charging
& Melting
at EBT
Spectro
analysisRefining
LF,VD
Ingot
CastingIngotSpectro
analysis
Final
Chemistry
SUSPECTED
AREA FOR
DEFECT
GENERATION
Yield in EN36C grade, 125 RCS made with 3.01 T input size is down by ~ 1 %. Yield is
less due to rejection occurring during ingot casting process .
4. c. Increase in Yield of EN36C 125 RCS by 1% by reducing rejections
Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
18Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
Innovation Details
Sl
No
Probable
CauseTesting and Observations Conclusion
1.High casting
speed
Data was collected 25 heats and co-
relation was observed of OK and Not OK
heats.
Hypothesis
is found
invalid.
2.High/low
Temperature
Data was collected 30 heats and co-
relation was observed of OK and Not OK
heats when EN36C heat was high/ low
temp.
Hypothesis
is found
invalid.
3Bloom Rolling
size
In heats with rolling size 125 RCS
scabbiness on surface was observed but
not frequently.
Hypothesis
is found
invalid.
4Frills
generation
Due to frill generation in ingots, it has to
be cut.
Hypothesis
is found
valid.
5Skilled
Manpower
Training is being given to the man power.
Skill levels are appropriate for the
teeming bay activities.
Hypothesis
is found
invalid.
19Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
Actions Decided
Valid
Probable
Cause
WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY
Frill
generation
Frill generation
during casting.
Due to gap
in between
mould wall &
hot top
Improper
fitment &
type of
hot tops.
Hot tops
don’t
take
shape of
wall.
Hot tops
are rigid.
Root Cause Action Plan Status
Frills
generation
Flexible hot top used
a) Monitoring heats where flexible hot top used. 100%
Implementedb) Observe ingot hot top surrounding portion
whether any frills generate & then record keeping
done.
20
BenefitsBefore After
Reduction in
rejection due to
Scabbiness
Tangible + Non-tangible
Decrease from 3.4 to 0 MT/ Month
Reduction in
production cost
Rs. 2100 / Ingot heats
Reduction in track time- Hot
heat to BLM
Decrease by 30 mins – Oil saving at re-heating Furnaces
❖ Frills generation totally eliminated
❖ Improvement in delivery schedule
❖ Reduced rework
21
Project Details :
▰ New Concept. Started in 2015. Till date, just over 400 companies have committed globally
[ including 6 from India ] to setup Science Based Target for their business.
▰ Mahindra Sanyo is the 1st Steel Company from India & 3rd Steel Company Globally to
commit to setting up Science Based target for its own business.
▰ Project conceptualized at Senior Management Level
Drivers for setting up SBT
Cost Competitiveness
Become preferred supplier
Managing ESG Risk & Opportunities in Value Chain
New Revenue Streams
Access to Capital
Safeguard future
profitabilityCommitted to
set Science
Based Target
March 2017
Developed
Science Based
Target
September –
December 2017
Submitted
Science Based
Target for
Quality Check
December 2017
Approved and Announced
Science Based Target-
(Reduce Scope-1 , 2 & 3
GHG Emission by 35 % by
2030 from baseline year
2016)
March 2018
4.d. Taking Climate Action by Setting Science Based Target (SBT)
22
Tangible + Non-tangible
Environmental
▪ Emission reduction
of more than 1
million tCO2e
▪ Along with a host of
other intangible
environmental
benefits
▪ Reduction in Scope-
1 & Scope -2 GHG
emission by 35 % by
2030 from 2016 as
baseline
Social
▪ People/society
benefits
▪ Moral/motivation
▪ Skill upgradation
▪ Attitude
shift/development
Economic
▪ Increase innovation
▪ Reduce regulatory
uncertainty
▪ Strengthen investor
confidence and
credibility
▪ Improve profitability
and competitiveness
▪ Savings of ₹ 146
Crore by 2023 from
2016
2% Improvement in Specific
Electricity Consumption
3% Improvement in Specific
Scope 2 emission
5% Power from Renewable
Energy Source
4.d. Benefits of Project :
23
Taking ambitious action now helps companies stay ahead of future policies and regulations to
limit GHG emissions. Companies that are seen as leaders are better able to influence policy
makers and help shape developing legislation.
Huge replication potential
▰ Universal application: Science Based Target applicable to all sectors and types of
businesses
▰ Methods of calculation: Methods are available to calculate SBT for all sector
Replication potential of project within sector:
▰ Steps initiated: Awareness session on SBTi within the company and across the group
▰ Achievement sharing Mode:Presented case of SBTi in different seminars organized by WRI
and CDP
▰ Based on MSSSPL’s success 10 Mahindra Group companies committed to set Science
Based Target for their Business in May 2018
▰ We have started engaging our Supply Chain to encourage them to adapt SBTi
4.d. Replication Potential within group and companies
24
5. Utilization of Renewable Energy
Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
Road Map to Achieve the Target :
1. Installation of 4 MWh Solar Plant ( Roof Top & Ground) within Plant premises
2. Renewable Power procurement through Open Access
MSEDCL, 38%
Conventional Source,
53%
Renewable Energy
source, 9%
Power Utilisation from Different Sources (%)
25
6.a. Utilization of Waste as Fuel
Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
Waste Utilization Process Flow
Canteen Food Waste Waste Transport
Bio Gas generation
& Storage Gen-SetStreet Lighting
26
6.b. Utilization of Waste
Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
Food Waste Utilization❖ For Promoting Green & Clean Energy –
MSSSPL has initiated food waste utilization drive in collaboration with KMC (Khopoli Municipal Corporation) –To generate Electricity from Food Waste.
❖ MSSSPL Contribution
❖ KMC Responsibility❖ Waste collection- 0.3 T / Day
❖ Waste transfer to KCM Facility❖ Waste segregation❖ Gas generation❖ Electricity generation❖ Plant Capacity
Energy saved by recycle of waste during FY 18
Total Refractories Recycle = 544 MT
Total Power saved under scope III at manufacturing end =129496 KWH (238 KWH/MT Specific Electricity Consumption)
Total Mill Scale Recycle = 6867 MT
Total Power saved = 13734 KWH
27
7. GHG Inventorisation
Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
1.Reduction in scope-1 : 30% (62872 T CO2-e) 1.Reduction in scope-2 : 13% (52187 T CO2-e)
Public disclosure :1. Through Mahindra Sanyo Annual Sustainability Report2. Annual CDP reporting3. Through SBT
28
Aspect Vision
❖ Scope - 1 emission reduction by 10%
❖ Scope - 2 emission reduction by 5%
❖ Scope - 3 emission reduction by 5%
❖ Water consumption reduction by 10%
❖ Collaborate to have environmentally and socially responsible suppliers only
Mode of Engagement
Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
Organized sector 7 workshops65% Tier I Suppliers engaged
Capacity Building & Alignment, Deep Engagement
Unorganized Sector4Workshops + 2Follow-up sessions
25 Tier-1 Suppliers engaged
Capacity Building through Story Telling, Mitigation of Social Hotspots
8. a. Sustainable Supply Chain Management
29
❑ Sustainable Supply Chain Policy and CoC in placed
❑ Collection of baseline data and audit framework in place
❑ Use Of SoFi for supplier data base
❑ Capacity Building of Suppliers through supplier meet
❑ Best Supplier award
❑ collaborative projects based on circular economy
❑ Participating in Road Testing of a GHG footprinting tool by India GHGP and
Climate Miles
❑ Creating a pool of certified Internal Auditors on BS 8903 Framework
Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
8. b. Actions & Initiatives
30
9.a. Energy Monitoring & Measurement System
• Over 90 state of art energy meters installed in the plant for strengthening the monitoring system . Monitoring through SACADA System provided by Schneider.
• Initiated IoT study for next level automation for process monitoring & control.
• Planning for motor management with advance Technology like SIMOCODE
Overall Energy Consumption Breakup/Month
Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
Steel Melting Shop, 64%Ring Division, 9%
Blooming Mill, 7%
Heat Treatment & Finishing Shop, 6%
Forge Shop, 4%
Rolling Mill, 2%
Continous Mill, 0.5%
Conditioning, 2%
Miscellaneous, 3%
Utility, 3%
31
9.b. Energy Review
Activities Time Slot 15 Min Daily Weekly Monthly Quaterly Half Yearly Annually
Recording
Monitoring
Max Demand Control
Main Receiving Station Shift Incharge
Shift Incharge
Shop HOD/Team
COO
Managing Director
Analysis &
Corrective Action GAP Analysis
Setting Target Shop wise targets
Meetings
Monitoring &
Controlling
112836365No. of reviews in
a year
Top management involvement in day to day activities of energy management . GAP analysis carried out for deviations.
Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
Power & Fuel
Shop Unit Budget F 18 Jun-17 Q1 GAP
A B A vs B
SMS Production MT
KWH/Ton on SMS prod - Varibale Power KWH/T
KWH/Ton on SMS prod - Overall Power KWH/T
SMS MT
EBT KWH/T
LF KWH/T
Auxiliaries KWH/T
SMS - Total KWH/T
CC Pit KWH/T
Blm KWH/T
C Mill
Forge Shop Total KWH/T
Bar-Production MT
Bar - Total KWH/T
Heat Treatment kwh/t (HT + Cnd+ Frg ) KWH/T
Heat Treatment kwh/t (HTFS Fce Only ) KWH/T
SMS -Ltrs / Ton (FO) Ltrs/T
SMS -Ltrs / Ton (Bio Diesel) Ltrs/MT
BLM O2 M3/MT ( Oxy-Fuel Fce 1,2,3,4,5,6) M3/T
BLM Oil Lts/MT ( Oxy-Fuel Fce 1,2,3,4,5,6) Ltrs/T
BLM Oil Lts/MT (Fce 7,8 W/o Oxy Fuel) Ltrs/T
BLM WHF Oil Lts/MT Ltrs/T
Bar Mill - Ltrs / Ton Ltrs/T
Forging - Ltrs / Ton Ltrs/T
Forging ( Fuel Only . Lts/Ton) Ltrs/T
Forging ( Oxygen Only . Lts/Ton) Ltrs/T
Ltr/Ton on SMS prod Ltrs/T
Oil Only Lts/MT in SMS Prod Ltrs/T
Reasons for
variance
32Shaswati Council Meeting
Energy Month Celebrations
9. c. Team Work In Energy Conservation
Cross Functional Teams
Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
Energy Team
Shop Floor Training for Energy Conservation
33
ISO 50001 : Energy Management System Journey
20082011Comprehensive Energy Audit by TERI
Energy Audit by Schneider Electric India Pvt. Ltd
Developed Energy Monitoring and Reporting System
Established Energy Management Policy
Set objectives, targets & action plans
2012
2012
2012
2012
ISO 50001:2011 Certified by TUV 2013
Siemens Audit 2013
2014 Measurement & Verification by
Schneider
2015 Re-Certification Audit
2016 Re-Certification Received
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step in the right direction
Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
2017 Energy Audit by TERI & SGS
34
Key AchievementsSustainability has been embedded in Mahindra Sanyo’s business strategy to shoulder their economic, environmental and social responsibility.
Achievements:❑ Reduction in water lift by 35% in last 4years❑ Reduction in Specific Energy consumption by 29% in last 6 years❑ Reduction in Oil consumption 50% by Oxy fuel technology❑ Reduction in GHG emission in 55%
❑ Power consumption from Renewable Energy – 5 %
❑ National Award for Excellence in Energy Management in 3 successive years 2015, 2016 and 2017
❑ The secondary steel sector Trophy for Excellence in Performance for the year 2016-17 – By Ministry of Steel Govt. of India
❑ Mahindra Sanyo is the first steel Company globally and first company from India to receive approval of its Science Based Targets
35
MSSSPL | Awards & Recognitions
Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
16th National Award for Excellence in Energy Management 2015:Energy Efficient Unit in Steel Sector & Most useful presentation in Steel
Sector
17th National Award for Excellence in Energy Management 2016:Excellent Energy Efficient Unit in Steel Sector & Most useful presentation in
Steel Sector
18th National Award for Excellence in Energy Management 2017:Energy Efficient Unit in Steel Sector
36Copyright © MSSSPL Elect. Dept. Aug 2018
37
Mould Hot Tops