magnetic signals generated by ocean flow in the...

1
MAGNETIC SIGNALS GENERATED BY OCEAN FLOW IN THE SWARM SATELLITE DATA: PREDICTION AND OBSERVATION Jakub Vel´ ımsk´ y 1 , Zden ˇ ek Martinec 1,2 , David Einˇ spigel 1,2 , and Libor ˇ Sachl 1,2 1 Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Department of Geophysics 2 Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, School of Cosmic Physics, Geophysics Section A BSTRACT Motion of sea water in the Earth’s main magnetic field generates the secondary induced field which can be decomposed into its poloidal and toroidal components. While the toroidal component is not directly observable outside the oceans, the poloidal magnetic field have been already validated by CHAMP satellite magnetic observations, land-based magnetic measurements and sea surface magnetic field measurements, despite the poloidal field being rather weak, reaching an intensity of up to a few nT. New possibilities of observations of the ocean-induced magnetic field came with the launching of ESA’s Swarm mission satellites which have provided a valuable amount of high-precision and high-resolution measurements of the Earth’s magnetic field. For a detection of weak ocean-induced signals and their interpretation, numerical modelling is crucial. We present results of modelling of the secondary magnetic field generated by ocean flow. Two ocean flow models are incorporated: 1) DEBOT, a barotropic (BT) model of ocean tide flow, and 2) LSOMG, a baroclinic (BC) model of global ocean currents. The secondary magnetic field is modelled using a three-dimensional time-domain approach. A preliminary comparison of predicted signals and observed signals extracted from Swarm satellite data will be shown. The future aim is to assimilate magnetic data provided by Swarm mission into the models. 1. DEBOT — A BAROTROPIC MODEL OF OCEAN TIDE FLOW Model description I Barotropic model, based on the shallow water equations (Einˇ spigel and Martinec, in press) I Full lunisolar tidal forcing I Discretization in space: finite differences on the Arakawa C-grid I Discretization in time: a generalized forward-backward time-stepping scheme, stable and second-order accurate Key parameters I Internal wave drag: Conversion of BT tides into BC waves, τ int = π L ˆ h 2 N b v, ˆ h 2 is bottom roughness, N b is buoyancy frequency, L is scaling factor I Bathymetric dataset: ETOPO1 or GEBCO I Self-attraction and loading of the seawater: Change of the gravitational potentional due to change in mass distribution of the seawater; reduced gravity g ε = g (1 - ε) I Eddy viscosity: Turbulences on very short scales cause energy losses in the large-scale motions, = A H ∇· E, A H is eddy viscosity, E is strain rate tensor I Bottom friction, s = r v|v| 2. LSOMG — A BAROCLINIC MODEL OF GLOBAL OCEAN CURRENTS I z-coordinate baroclinic ocean model in hydrostatic and Boussinesq approximations I Discretization in space: finite differences on the Arakawa C-grid I Discretization in time: staggered time-stepping of BT and BC subsystems with different time steps; BT system uses the predictor-corrector scheme I Bathymetry: GEBCO or ETOPO1 I Temperature and salinity distributions: World Ocean Atlas 2013 I Wind speed: NCEP/NCAR 3. ELMGIV — T IME - DOMAIN EM INDUCTION MODEL I Spatial discretization by spherical harmonics and 1-D finite elements (Vel´ ımsk´ y and Martinec, 2005) I Crank-Nicolson time integration scheme I Excitation by a complete Lorentz force vector I 1-D mantle conductivity profile 2 3 4 log (τ in S) 4000 5000 6000 r (km) 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 σ (S/m) I barotropic flows: 2-D near-surface conductance map based on bathymetry and sediment thicknesses I baroclinic flows: 3-D near-surface conductivity model based on bathymetry and sediment thicknesses 4. P REDICTION OF MAGNETIC SIGNATURES OF TIDAL FLOWS Snapshot of horizontal velocities of tidal flow at t = 2014.20964422 A H = 10 4 m 2 / s, r = 3, ε = 0.08, L = 10000, 30 0 × 30 0 resolution -0.04 -0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04 v ϑ (m/s) -0.04 -0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04 v ϕ (m/s) Induced magnetic field along selected Swarm tracks -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 X (nT) A orbit 001755 , 2014-03-17 13:42:38 - 2014-03-17 14:14:01 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 Y (nT) B orbit 001751 , 2014-03-17 13:32:06 - 2014-03-17 14:03:47 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 Z (nT) C orbit 001752 , 2014-03-17 13:50:04 - 2014-03-17 14:21:32 -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 ϑ -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 ϑ -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 ϑ -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 ϑ -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 ϑ -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 ϑ -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 ϑ -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 ϑ -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 ϑ Snapshot of induced magnetic field at 480 km altitude R EFERENCES Einˇ spigel, D. and Martinec, Z. A new derivation of the shallow water equations in geographical coordinates and their application to the global barotropic ocean model (the debot model). Ocean Modelling, in press. doi: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.05.006. Vel´ ımsk´ y, J. and Martinec, Z. Time-domain, spherical harmonic-finite element approach to transient three-dimensional geomagnetic induction in a spherical heterogeneous earth. Geophys. J. Int., 160:81–101, 2005. 5. S ENSITIVITY OF MAGNETIC SIGNATURES TO MODEL SETTINGS Effect of resolution, eddy viscosity, self-attraction and loading, and internal wave drag Run spatial resolution A H ε L A 20 0 × 20 0 1 10 4 m 2 / s 0.08 0 B 30 0 × 30 0 1 10 4 m 2 / s 0.08 0 C 30 0 × 30 0 1 10 4 m 2 / s 0.10 0 D 30 0 × 30 0 1 10 4 m 2 / s 0.12 0 E 30 0 × 30 0 1 10 5 m 2 / s 0.08 0 F 30 0 × 30 0 5 10 4 m 2 / s 0.08 0 G 30 0 × 30 0 1 10 4 m 2 / s 0.08 8000 H 30 0 × 30 0 1 10 4 m 2 / s 0.08 10000 I 30 0 × 30 0 1 10 4 m 2 / s 0.08 12000 Induced magnetic field along the track A001755.5 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 -50 0 50 ϑ X (nT) A B C D E F G H I -50 0 50 ϑ Y (nT) A B C D E F G H I -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 -50 0 50 ϑ Z (nT) A B C D E F G H I -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 -50 0 50 ϑ Z (nT) 6. P REDICTION OF MAGNETIC SIGNATURES OF GLOBAL CURRENTS Snapshot of velocities of wind-forced flow at t = 2014.20964422 in the uppermost ocean layer Model settings: horizontal resolution: 1 , vertical resolution: 11 layers, BC time step 1800 s, BT time step 30 s -0.0002 -0.0001 0.0000 0.0001 0.0002 v r (m/s) r=6370.994 km -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 v ϑ (m/s) -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 v ϕ (m/s) Induced magnetic field along selected Swarm tracks -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 X (nT) A orbit 001755 , 2014-03-17 13:42:38 - 2014-03-17 14:14:01 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 Y (nT) B orbit 001751 , 2014-03-17 13:32:06 - 2014-03-17 14:03:47 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Z (nT) C orbit 001752 , 2014-03-17 13:50:04 - 2014-03-17 14:21:32 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 ϑ -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 ϑ -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 ϑ -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 ϑ -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 ϑ -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 ϑ -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 ϑ -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 ϑ -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 ϑ Snapshot of induced magnetic field at 480 km altitude 7. P RELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF S WARM DATA Track-by-track analysis I Swarm Level 1b data in NEC frame, 1s sampling, version 0404 I Removal of CHAOS-5 main field model I Night-time (22:00–06:00 LT), magnetically quiet, mid-latitude data (-60 , +60 ) I Degree 25 Legendre polynomial fit (smoothing) I Degree 5 Legendre polynomial fit and extrapolation to polar areas I Analysis of the expansion coefficients determines whether a source of the field is the only one and whether the source is purely internal or external or a combination of both I Desired ocean-induced signals have only one internal source, otherwise the data are biased by signals from the magnetosphere or ionosphere I The signals of the 1st and 2nd order have often an external source in the magnetosphere, hence, only the 3rd–5th order signals are used Figure description I Top: Position and time of the track I Middle top: Residua after removal of the main field (thin lines) and a fitted expansion into Legendre polynomials to the 5th degree (thick lines) I Middle bottom: Amplitudes of the signal. A source of the magnetic field is the only one if the light blue and red dots overlap, and the source is internal if the purple dots lie on the x axis I Bottom: The 3rd–5th order signals and residua of the fitted data Track No. A07312 day=199.601 local time (h)=5.23 data missing = 0 longitude = -137.7999 dB=Swarm-main -20 -10 0 10 20 X, Z (nT) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Colatitude 0riginal data (red, blue), dP n and P n fit (thick) 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Amplitude 0 2 4 6 8 Degree j red = X comp. blue = Z comp. -2 -1 0 1 2 X, Z (nT) 40 60 80 100 120 140 Colatitude geo.mff.cuni.cz/SwarmOceans/ [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 19-May-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • MAGNETIC SIGNALS GENERATED BY OCEAN FLOW IN THE SWARMSATELLITE DATA: PREDICTION AND OBSERVATION

    Jakub Velı́mský1, Zdeněk Martinec1,2, David Einšpigel1,2, and Libor Šachl1,21Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Department of Geophysics

    2Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, School of Cosmic Physics, Geophysics Section

    ABSTRACTMotion of sea water in the Earth’s main magnetic field generates the secondary induced field whichcan be decomposed into its poloidal and toroidal components. While the toroidal component is notdirectly observable outside the oceans, the poloidal magnetic field have been already validated byCHAMP satellite magnetic observations, land-based magnetic measurements and sea surfacemagnetic field measurements, despite the poloidal field being rather weak, reaching an intensity of upto a few nT. New possibilities of observations of the ocean-induced magnetic field came with thelaunching of ESA’s Swarm mission satellites which have provided a valuable amount of high-precisionand high-resolution measurements of the Earth’s magnetic field. For a detection of weakocean-induced signals and their interpretation, numerical modelling is crucial. We present results ofmodelling of the secondary magnetic field generated by ocean flow. Two ocean flow models areincorporated: 1) DEBOT, a barotropic (BT) model of ocean tide flow, and 2) LSOMG, a baroclinic (BC)model of global ocean currents. The secondary magnetic field is modelled using a three-dimensionaltime-domain approach. A preliminary comparison of predicted signals and observed signals extractedfrom Swarm satellite data will be shown. The future aim is to assimilate magnetic data provided bySwarm mission into the models.

    1. DEBOT — A BAROTROPIC MODEL OF OCEAN TIDE FLOWModel descriptionI Barotropic model, based on

    the shallow water equations(Einšpigel and Martinec, inpress)

    I Full lunisolar tidal forcingI Discretization in space:

    finite differences on theArakawa C-grid

    I Discretization in time:a generalizedforward-backwardtime-stepping scheme,stable and second-orderaccurate

    Key parametersI Internal wave drag: Conversion of BT tides into BC waves,τ int =

    πL ĥ

    2 Nb v, ĥ2 is bottom roughness, Nb is buoyancy frequency, L isscaling factor

    I Bathymetric dataset: ETOPO1 or GEBCOI Self-attraction and loading of the seawater: Change of the gravitational

    potentional due to change in mass distribution of the seawater;reduced gravity gε = g (1− ε)

    I Eddy viscosity: Turbulences on very short scales cause energy lossesin the large-scale motions, ~σ = AH∇ · E, AH is eddy viscosity, E isstrain rate tensor

    I Bottom friction, s = r v|v|

    2. LSOMG — A BAROCLINIC MODEL OF GLOBAL OCEAN CURRENTS

    I z-coordinate baroclinic ocean model in hydrostatic and Boussinesq approximationsI Discretization in space: finite differences on the Arakawa C-gridI Discretization in time: staggered time-stepping of BT and BC subsystems with different time steps;

    BT system uses the predictor-corrector schemeI Bathymetry: GEBCO or ETOPO1I Temperature and salinity distributions: World Ocean Atlas 2013I Wind speed: NCEP/NCAR

    3. ELMGIV — TIME-DOMAIN EM INDUCTION MODEL

    I Spatial discretization by spherical harmonics and1-D finite elements (Velı́mský and Martinec, 2005)

    I Crank-Nicolson time integration schemeI Excitation by a complete Lorentz force vectorI 1-D mantle conductivity profile

    2 3 4

    log (τ in S)

    4000

    5000

    6000

    r (k

    m)

    0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10

    σ (S/m)

    I barotropic flows: 2-D near-surface conductance map based on bathymetry and sediment thicknessesI baroclinic flows: 3-D near-surface conductivity model based on bathymetry and sediment thicknesses

    4. PREDICTION OF MAGNETIC SIGNATURES OF TIDAL FLOWSSnapshot of horizontal velocitiesof tidal flow at t = 2014.20964422AH = 104 m

    2/s, r = 3, ε = 0.08,L = 10000, 30′ × 30′ resolution

    −0.04 −0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04

    vϑ (m/s)

    −0.04 −0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04

    vϕ (m/s)

    Induced magnetic field along selected Swarm tracks

    −6 −4 −2 0 2 4 6

    X (nT)

    A orbit 001755 ↑, 2014−03−17 13:42:38 − 2014−03−17 14:14:01

    −6 −4 −2 0 2 4 6

    Y (nT)

    B orbit 001751 ↓, 2014−03−17 13:32:06 − 2014−03−17 14:03:47

    −6 −4 −2 0 2 4 6

    Z (nT)

    C orbit 001752 ↑, 2014−03−17 13:50:04 − 2014−03−17 14:21:32

    −2.5

    −2.0

    −1.5

    −1.0

    −0.5

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5−60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60

    ϑ

    −2.5

    −2.0

    −1.5

    −1.0

    −0.5

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5−60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60

    ϑ

    −2.5

    −2.0

    −1.5

    −1.0

    −0.5

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5−60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60

    ϑ

    −60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60

    ϑ

    −60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60

    ϑ

    −60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60

    ϑ

    −2.5

    −2.0

    −1.5

    −1.0

    −0.5

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5−60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60

    ϑ

    −2.5

    −2.0

    −1.5

    −1.0

    −0.5

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5−60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60

    ϑ

    −2.5

    −2.0

    −1.5

    −1.0

    −0.5

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5−60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60

    ϑ

    Snapshot of induced magnetic field at 480 km altitude

    REFERENCESEinšpigel, D. and Martinec, Z. A new derivation of the shallow water equations in geographical coordinates and theirapplication to the global barotropic ocean model (the debot model). Ocean Modelling, in press. doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.05.006.

    Velı́mský, J. and Martinec, Z. Time-domain, spherical harmonic-finite element approach to transient three-dimensionalgeomagnetic induction in a spherical heterogeneous earth. Geophys. J. Int., 160:81–101, 2005.

    5. SENSITIVITY OF MAGNETIC SIGNATURES TO MODEL SETTINGSEffect of resolution, eddy viscosity, self-attraction and loading, and internal wave drag

    Run spatial resolution AH ε LA 20′ × 20′ 1 104 m2/s 0.08 0B 30′ × 30′ 1 104 m2/s 0.08 0C 30′ × 30′ 1 104 m2/s 0.10 0D 30′ × 30′ 1 104 m2/s 0.12 0E 30′ × 30′ 1 105 m2/s 0.08 0F 30′ × 30′ 5 104 m2/s 0.08 0G 30′ × 30′ 1 104 m2/s 0.08 8000H 30′ × 30′ 1 104 m2/s 0.08 10000I 30′ × 30′ 1 104 m2/s 0.08 12000

    Induced magnetic field along the track A001755.5

    −1.5

    −1.0

    −0.5

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    −50 0 50

    ϑ

    X (nT)

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    H

    I

    −50 0 50

    ϑ

    Y (nT)

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    H

    I

    −1.5

    −1.0

    −0.5

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    −50 0 50

    ϑ

    Z (nT)

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    H

    I

    −1.5

    −1.0

    −0.5

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    −50 0 50

    ϑ

    Z (nT)

    6. PREDICTION OF MAGNETIC SIGNATURES OF GLOBAL CURRENTSSnapshot of velocities of wind-forced flow at t = 2014.20964422 in the uppermost ocean layerModel settings: horizontal resolution: 1◦, vertical resolution: 11 layers, BC time step 1800 s, BT timestep 30 s

    −0.0002 −0.0001 0.0000 0.0001 0.0002

    vr (m/s)

    r=6370.994 km

    −0.4 −0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4

    vϑ (m/s)

    −0.4 −0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4

    vϕ (m/s)

    Induced magnetic field along selected Swarm tracks

    −1.5 −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

    X (nT)

    A orbit 001755 ↑, 2014−03−17 13:42:38 − 2014−03−17 14:14:01

    −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

    Y (nT)

    B orbit 001751 ↓, 2014−03−17 13:32:06 − 2014−03−17 14:03:47

    −1.5 −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

    Z (nT)

    C orbit 001752 ↑, 2014−03−17 13:50:04 − 2014−03−17 14:21:32

    −0.6

    −0.4

    −0.2

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6−60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60

    ϑ

    −0.6

    −0.4

    −0.2

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6−60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60

    ϑ

    −0.6

    −0.4

    −0.2

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6−60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60

    ϑ

    −60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60

    ϑ

    −60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60

    ϑ

    −60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60

    ϑ

    −0.6

    −0.4

    −0.2

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6−60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60

    ϑ

    −0.6

    −0.4

    −0.2

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6−60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60

    ϑ

    −0.6

    −0.4

    −0.2

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6−60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60

    ϑ

    Snapshot of induced magnetic field at 480 km altitude

    7. PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF SWARM DATATrack-by-track analysisI Swarm Level 1b data in NEC frame,

    1 s sampling, version 0404I Removal of CHAOS-5 main field modelI Night-time (22:00–06:00 LT), magnetically quiet,

    mid-latitude data (−60◦,+60◦)I Degree 25 Legendre polynomial fit (smoothing)I Degree 5 Legendre polynomial fit and

    extrapolation to polar areasI Analysis of the expansion coefficients

    determines whether a source of the field is theonly one and whether the source is purelyinternal or external or a combination of both

    I Desired ocean-induced signals have only oneinternal source, otherwise the data are biased bysignals from the magnetosphere or ionosphere

    I The signals of the 1st and 2nd order have oftenan external source in the magnetosphere,hence, only the 3rd–5th order signals are used

    Figure descriptionI Top: Position and time of the trackI Middle top: Residua after removal of the main

    field (thin lines) and a fitted expansion intoLegendre polynomials to the 5th degree (thicklines)

    I Middle bottom: Amplitudes of the signal. Asource of the magnetic field is the only one if thelight blue and red dots overlap, and the source isinternal if the purple dots lie on the x axis

    I Bottom: The 3rd–5th order signals and residuaof the fitted data

    Track No. A07312day=199.601local time (h)=5.23 data missing = 0longitude = −137.799983dB=Swarm−main

    −20

    −10

    0

    10

    20

    X, Z

    (nT

    )

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180Colatitude

    0riginal data (red, blue), dPn and Pn fit (thick)

    0.01

    0.1

    1

    10

    100

    Am

    pli

    tude

    0 2 4 6 8Degree j

    red = X comp.

    blue = Z comp.

    −2

    −1

    0

    1

    2

    X, Z

    (nT

    )

    40 60 80 100 120 140Colatitude

    geo.mff.cuni.cz/SwarmOceans/ [email protected]