mac201 impartiality lecture

39
#MAC201 Robert Jewitt [email protected] News: objectivity, impartiality & balance 1

Upload: rob-jewitt

Post on 06-Jul-2015

2.123 views

Category:

Education


3 download

DESCRIPTION

MAC201 Level 2 lecture on news and impartiality. Updated October 2013

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mac201   impartiality lecture

#MAC201Robert Jewitt

robert. [email protected]

News: objectivity, impartiality & balance

1

Page 3: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Which? Report (2012)

Professions by percentage of people who said they are trustworthy:

3

Page 4: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Which? Report (2012)

Professions by percentage of people who said they are trustworthy:

4

1. Politicians 7%2. Journalists 7%3. Bankers 11%4. Estate agents 11%5. Builders 19%6. Civil servants 25%7. Accountants 29%8. Lawyers 35%9. Engineers 56%10. Teachers 69%

Page 6: Mac201   impartiality lecture

6

“This goes to the heart of science reporting – you wouldn't have a homeopath speaking alongside a brain surgeon for balance, as that would be absurd.

It's just as absurd to have a climate sceptic for balance against the work of the overwhelming majority of climate scientists.”- Steve Jones, biologist

Page 8: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Session Outline

IntroductionFourth EstateWhat is objectivity?

Origins of objectivity Objectivity in practice – Examples...

What is impartiality?What do we mean by balance?Conclusion

8

Page 9: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Power of the media: Fourth Estate

The “forth estate” - separate from: the church the judiciary the commons (see Allan, 2004: 47)

“The public trust most of the things they read in newspapers so journalists must be responsible in the way they present issues that directly affect the lives of others” (Nyaira, 2004: 34 cited in Harcup, 2007: 3).

9

Page 10: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Power of the media: Fourth Estate

1. “Democratic” role: help the public understand the world around them

1. “Watchdog” role: “bring misdemeanours to the attention of the

public” See Conboy, 2004: 110

10

Page 11: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Criticisms...

“The ideas of the ruling class are in every epoch the ruling ideas, i.e. the class which is the ruling material force of society, is at the same time its ruling intellectual force.” (Karl Marx, 1845)

11

Page 12: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Criticisms...

Ethnic minorities “opinions are less asked or found less credible or newsworthy, also because most journalists (and virtually all editors) are white” (Cottle, 2000: 36)

12

Page 13: Mac201   impartiality lecture

A fair say?

Allan (2004: 52) points to the increasing marginalisation of voices in:◦ The labour movement◦ Trade unions◦ Feminists◦ Anti-racists◦ Environmentalists◦ Anti-poverty activists ◦ Groups committed to progressive social change

13

Page 14: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Objectivity:

Simply: Trust & Reliabil i tyFactors include: Factual accuracy; unbiased,

separation of fact from comment, not taking sides

“Controversy about the term stem mainly from the view that true objectivity is unattainable and it is misleading to pretend otherwise” (McQuail, 2000: 500).

Ideological...

14

Page 15: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Truth?

Whose ‘truth’?Truths based on facts?Facts require full contextsFacts must be accurate

Does the news have t ime and space to explore all issues ‘truthfully ’?

15

Page 16: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Objective reporting

1. What?

2. Who?

3. When?

4. Where?

5. How?

And if possible….

6. Why?

For more see: Manoff and Shudson,

1986: 2-10; Sigal, 1973: 66-9.

Objectivity = verif iable facts (not interpretation)

Extra's: incident, interview, report

16

Page 17: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Verification17

Page 18: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Pressure to remain profitable & cost-effective hinders lengthy investigative journalism

24 hour production cycle forces tight deadlines upon journalists - New technologies enhance the speed of reporting

Work to set rules of practice, proven to get results in an attempt to explain the unpredictable

Routinising the unexpectedRoutinising the unexpected (see Allan, 2004: p64) (see Allan, 2004: p64)

18

Page 19: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Story quotas uncovered…

Typical scaremongering story in Metro News ‘Game Transfer Phenomena’

19

Page 20: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Story quotas uncovered…

“The Metro, they obviously had an agenda - because all [the reporter] said was that he just wanted to know about the negative stuff. I told him that the paper was primarily positive, or at least neutral. He said 'I don't want to know about that, I want to know the negative stuff.' So I just went through what we did, what we found and what we are doing next.”

Prof Griffiths, author of the study!!!

20

Page 21: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Hierarchies

The farm owners or residentsLocal politicians (Councillor Tony Ball)BailiffsEnvironmental health officialsCampaigners

Journalists rely on a commonsensical understanding that society is bureaucratically

structured (Fishman, 1980: 51)For example: Dale Farm eviction

21

Page 22: Mac201   impartiality lecture

BBC1 coverage ITV1 coverage

Images of protester in concrete

3 second soundbite of angry resident

5 second soundbite of campaigner

5 second soundbite of resident

20 second piece by Councillor

Audio of aggressive residents

18 second appeal by bailiffs

2 second soundbite of angry resident

Images of celebrations 10 second piece by

Councillor

22

Page 23: Mac201   impartiality lecture

‘‘Primary definersPrimary definers’’

‘This means constantly turning to accredited representatives of major social institutions – M.P.s for political topics, employers and trade union leaders for industrial matters, and so on…’ (Hall et al, 1978: 58)

23

Page 24: Mac201   impartiality lecture

‘‘Primary definersPrimary definers’’

‘Such institutional representatives are “accredited” because of their institut ional power and posit ion, but also because of their “representative” status: either they represent “the people” (M.P.s, Ministers, etc.) or organised interest groups’ (Hall et al, 1978: 58)

24

Page 25: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Reporting of Islam

“The attack is not against Islam as a faith but Muslims as people” (Halliday, 1999: 898).

Different forms of Islamic belief? 1960s – immigration (problem of numbers) 1970s & 80s – Black community (criminals) & Irish (IRA/

terrorism) 1990s to present – Muslims (Un-British/ terrorists) & Asylum

(damaging to Britain)

25

Page 26: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Is Islam reported objectively?

Empirical work – “72% of art icles over a six month period in The Sun contained the words terrorism and Islam together” (April – September 2008).

“The public trust most of the things they read”

Any event concerning Islam, who do the media turn to as a source???

26

Abu Hamza Omar Bakri

Page 27: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Contemporary media: Quick & Easy

Bell’s study (1991) – pre-packaged news

Newsmakers rely on: Interviews (face to face, phone, email, etc)Public addressesPress conferencesReports, letters, minutes, surveys, etcPress releasesNews agency copy

27

Page 28: Mac201   impartiality lecture

The influence of news agencies and PR28

From Flat Earth News: Direct rewrites of PA article: 30% Largely reproduced from agencies: 19% Contained elements: 21%

News sourced from press agencies: 70% (this excludes PR material which would push figure even

higher)

In SunSpace:Justin Lewis, Andrew Williams and Bob Franklin, 2008, ‘Four Rumours and an Explanation: A political economic account of journalists’ changing newsgathering and reporting practices’ in Journalism Practice, Vol 2, No 1, pp 25-45.

Page 29: Mac201   impartiality lecture

The influence of news agencies and PR29

From Flat Earth News: “PA has such credibility that media outlets treat it

as a reliable source which does not need to be checked. The BBC’s internal guidelines … specifically instruct their journalists that they must have at least two sources for every story – unless it is running on PA … A special notice issued by the BBC journalism board on 1 December 2004 told the staff: ‘The Press Association can be treated as a confirmed, single source’”

Davies, 2008: p74-5

Page 30: Mac201   impartiality lecture

The rise of The rise of ““impartialityimpartiality””??

Defined as:

A “sound practice [that] makes clear distinction between news reports and expressions of opinion. News reports should be free of opinion or bias of any kind”

(American Society of Newspaper Editors, 1923 in Allan, 2004: 22)

30

Page 31: Mac201   impartiality lecture

““ImpartialityImpartiality”” has become… has become…

The doctrine of “not taking sides” in the reporting of public affairs

Realisation of the impossibility of absolute “objectivity”, seeking “balance” instead

31

Page 32: Mac201   impartiality lecture

BUT…

In the context of unexpected breaking news, how do you achieve balance?

Developments are unknowable?

????? ?????

32

Page 33: Mac201   impartiality lecture

““Due impartialityDue impartiality””

“To ensure that news, in whatever form, is reported with due accuracy and presented with due impart ial i ty” http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/broadcast-code/impartiality/

BBC have extra guidelines

http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/our_work/other/century21.shtml

33

Page 34: Mac201   impartiality lecture

34

Page 35: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Accusations of bias

BBC Trust5 impartiality reviews

since 2007: 2013: religion and ethics,

UK/EU relationship, immigration

2012: “Arab spring” 2012: science coverage 2008: 4 nations 2007: business coverage

35

Page 36: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Conclusion

Objectivity can never be satisfied due to the structural limitations of strict deadlines for news and the consequences of routinising the unexpected.

News aims for impartial ity which is problematic given that news selection and posit ioning means subjective value decisions sti l l have to be made

The ‘truth’ of news is that it is ideological

36

Page 37: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Points to consider:

Objectivity? (is it possible?)

Impartiality (Is it necessary?)

What are the techniques by which the news makes itself credible?

37

Page 38: Mac201   impartiality lecture

Sources

S. Allan, 2004, News Culture 2nd Edition, Berkshire: Open University Press A. Bell, 1991, The Language of the New Media, Oxford: Blackwell. N. Davies, 2008, Flat Earth News, London: Chatto & Windus Stuart Hall, ‘The Whites of Their Eyes: Racist Ideologies and the Media’ in Paul Marris and Sue Thornham (eds.) 1997,

Media Studies: A Reader, Dundee: Edinburgh University Press S. Hall, C. Critcher, Jefferson, Clarke, Roberts, 1978, Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, Law and Order, D. Hallin, 1986, The Uncensored War: The Media and Vietnam, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Justin Lewis, Andrew Williams and Bob Franklin, 2008, ‘Four Rumours and an Explanation: A political economic

account of journalists’ changing newsgathering and reporting practices’ in Journalism Practice, Vol 2, No 1, pp 25-45. M. Leapman, 1992, Treacherous Estate, London: Hodder & Stoughton. R. K. Manoff and M. Shudson (eds.), 1986, Reading the News, New York: Pantheon. J. Palmer, 1998, ‘News production: news values’ in A. Briggs and P. Cobley, The Media: An Introduction, Harlow:

Longman. R. McChesney, 2001, ‘Global Media, Neoliberalism, and Imperialism’ at http://www.monthlyreview.org/301rwm.htm P. Schlesinger, 1987, Putting Reality Together 2nd edition, London: Methuen. L. V. Sigal, 1973, Reporters and Officials, Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath. M. Shudson, 1991, ‘The sociology of news production revisited’ in J. Curran and M. Gurevitch (eds.), Mass Media and

Society, Arnold: London. G. Tuchman, 1978, Making News, New York: Free Press.

38

Page 39: Mac201   impartiality lecture

See also:

Race and ideology in newsStuart Hall, ‘The Whites of Their Eyes: Racist

Ideologies and the Media’ in Paul Marris and Sue Thornham (eds.) 1997, Media Studies: A Reader, Dundee: Edinburgh University Press

Corporate media ownershipRobert McChesney, 2001, ‘Global Media,

Neoliberalism, and Imperialism’ at http://www.monthlyreview.org/301rwm.htm

39