m&a today – the numbers & the law kpmg february 12, 2004 numbers: mitch manassa, kpmg llp...

27
M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon & Glickson

Upload: carol-simmons

Post on 27-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law

kpmg

February 12, 2004

Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLPLee Singer, FGMK

Law:Neal White, MW&EScott Glickson, Gordon & Glickson

Page 2: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

THE NUMBERS

Sarbanes-Oxley 404 Revenue Recognition Purchase Price Allocation Normalization of Financial

Statements Off-Balance Pitfalls

kpmg

Page 3: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

SARBANES-OXLEY 404

Effective dates Due diligence considerations Acquisition/Merger

considerations Seller pitfalls Private equity

kpmg

Page 4: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

Revenue33%

Cost28%

Other17%

Loan loss9%

IPR&D6%

Acquisition4%

Revenue & cost

3%

Source: Financial Executive Research Foundation

Main Reasons Sales contingencies not

disclosed to accounting or management

Sales booked before delivery completed

Significant rights of return existed

Software revenue recognized before underlying services were performed

False sales agreements and documentation

“Bill and hold” sales not deferred

RESTATEMENTS IN RECENT YEARS

One third of all restatements were attributed to revenue recognition issues

kpmg

Page 5: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

REVENUE RECOGNITION

Relevant guidance for technology firms

Complexities in revenue recognition

Due diligence considerations

kpmg

Page 6: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

ACCOUNTING GUIDANCE Transaction considerations: Maintenance & service

contracts Multiple/bundled elements Distributor/reseller

agreements Customer contracts are key Bill and hold transactions Side agreements Extended payment terms Customizing or installation Price determination

agreements

What are the rules?

Basic principles under SAB 101:

– Persuasive evidence

– Delivery

– Fixed and determinable payment terms

– Collectibility

Other recognition “areas”:

– Percentage of completion

– Completed contract

– Installment sales

– Upfront fees

kpmg

Page 7: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

REVENUE ANALYSIS Categorize customers as many ways as possible:

– End users, resellers, distributors, or related parties;

– Customers by product or service;– Customers by industry;– Customers by geography; and– One-time verses recurring.

Understand the unique contractual arrangements that exist for each type of customer such as:– Milestone completion;– Rights of approval/return; and– Cancellation clauses.

kpmg

Page 8: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

PURCHASE PRICE ALLOCATION

Identifiable intangible assets IPR&D Goodwill (remainder) Post-merger amortization Valuations

kpmg

Page 9: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

NORMALIZATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Page 10: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

PURPOSE

To remove excess charges or credits in the financial statements; adjusting the financial statements to conform with GAAP and recasting the financial statements to anticipate the major changes that will effect the business after merger or acquisition has been completed

Page 11: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

PURPOSE

What prior operations might have looked like under normal conditions and on a consistent basis;

or What prospective buyers might

reasonably be expected to obtain from the company in the future using history as a guide.

Page 12: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

COMMON NORMALIZATION ADJUSTMENTS

Balance Sheet Adjustments Income Statement Adjustments Other

Page 13: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

BALANCE SHEET ADJUSTMENTS

Non operating assets, excess assets and asset shortages

Loans to/from related parties

Page 14: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

INCOME STATEMENT ADJUSTMENTS

Compensation of owner or family members

Fringe benefits Non-recurring income and

expenses Income and expenses related to

excess assets, non-operating assets and asset shortages

Related party revenues and expenses

Page 15: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

OTHER

Non cash items Corporate cost allocations Income taxes

Page 16: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

OFF-BALANCE SHEET PITFALLS

Page 17: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

PURPOSE

Amounts that are not typically booked in a GAAP financial statement, but may have a major effect on forecasted earnings;

and To alert a prospective buyer

about monetary amounts that may have a material effect on financial performance.

Page 18: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

TYPICAL OFF-BALANCE SHEET PITFALLS

Warranty obligations (Fin 45, 46) Related party guarantees Lease commitments Maintenance contracts Purchase agreements Deferred taxes Shelf life of product Income, sales and use tax audits Non compete agreements Product liability

Page 19: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

The Law – A Mock Negotiation

Law:Neal White, McDermott, Will & Emery Scott Glickson, Gordon & Glickson

Page 20: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

THE DEAL

The Company - $200 Million Revenue manufacturer of wireless video wristwatch email web-browser solar powered telephone

Has been S-Corporation for more than 10 years Founder/CEO owns 75% on fully diluted basis,

25% represented in minority investors and employees

Founder has guaranteed company obligations on lease on manufacturing facility

The Buyer – Public Company, NASDAQ Listed The Proposed Price -$50 Million in public

company stock and cash Hart Scott Rodino Notification Required

Page 21: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

Asset vs. Stock deal (parties have determined it is neutral from tax perspective)

Representation and warranty regarding no infringement of third party rights by the product technology

Representation and warranty regarding steps taken to protect trade secrets and other confidential information

Representation and warranty of accuracy of all information provided in due diligence and that everything relevant has been disclosed

THE ISSUES THAT THE PARTIES WANT TO RESOLVE IN THE TERMS SHEET BEFORE PROCEEDING

Page 22: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

Purchaser’s right to walk for material adverse change

Founder’s condition that his lease guaranty be released at closing

Limitations on liability 1. Statute of Limitations2. Cap on Liability3. Basket For Immaterial Claims4. Joint and several liability of sellers

THE ISSUES THAT THE PARTIES WANT TO RESOLVE IN THE TERMS SHEET BEFORE PROCEEDING

Page 23: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REP

Seller owns and possesses or has the right to use under a valid and enforceable license, sublicense, agreement or permission all Intellectual Property constituting Purchased Assets. Each item of Intellectual Property included in the Purchased Assets will be owned or available for use by Purchaser upon the Closing on terms and conditions identical to those that Seller enjoys immediately before the Closing,

Seller has not interfered with, infringed upon or misappropriated any Intellectual Property rights of third parties as a result of its use of the Purchased Assets,

Page 24: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

All persons creating any Intellectual Property as employees or contractors have assigned all rights therein to the Company

Seller has never agreed to indemnify any Person for or against any interference, infringement or misappropriation with respect to the item, except pursuant to ordinary course sales supply contracts with customers;

Seller has taken all necessary action to preserve and protect all Intellectual Property

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REP

Page 25: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

BUYER’S AND SELLER’S CONDITIONS

Material Adverse Change It shall be a condition to Purchaser’s

obligation to close that there shall have been no material adverse change in the financial condition, business, assets or prospects in the Company, whether Company specific or related to general industry or economic trends,

Release of Guaranty It shall be a condition to Sellers’

obligation to close that Founder shall have been released from his lease guaranty.

Page 26: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

ACCURACY OF INFORMATION All information which has been provided to Purchaser

by or on behalf of the Sellers is true and complete and no material fact has been omitted therefrom which would make such information misleading. Sellers has made or caused to be made reasonable inquiry with respect to each covenant, agreement, obligation, representation and warranty of Sellers contained in this Agreement and none of the aforesaid covenants, agreements, obligations, representations or warranties contains any untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state a material fact necessary to make such covenant, agreement, obligation, representation or warranty not misleading. Sellers have disclosed to Purchaser all information that Purchaser could reasonably determine to be material to its acquisition of the Company.

Page 27: M&A Today – The Numbers & The Law kpmg February 12, 2004 Numbers: Mitch Manassa, KPMG LLP Lee Singer, FGMK Law: Neal White, MW&E Scott Glickson, Gordon

INDEMNIFICATION THRESHOLD & CAP

No amount will be payable by the Sellers in indemnification unless and until the Damages exceed $10,000 in the aggregate. However, this threshold limitation does not apply to any breach of any of Sellers’ representations and warranties of which Sellers had knowledge at any time before the date on which such representation or warranty was made, or (d) any intentional breach by Seller of any covenant or obligation (If the aggregate amount of all Damages exceeds $10,000 then the Sellers shall be jointly and severally for all of the Damages from the first dollar. Seller’s maximum liability under this Agreement is the purchase price.