m07 10 g_kegel_ff_topologies_for_is_5.12.07

24
© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation Dr.-Ing. Gunther Kegel CEO Pepperl+Fuchs GmbH, Mannheim Member of the Fieldbus Foundation Board of Directors Chairman of the FF European Executive Advisory Council Foundation Fieldbus Topologies for Intrinsically Safe (IS) Installations

Upload: achmad-rizky-w

Post on 14-Jul-2015

55 views

Category:

Engineering


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

Dr.-Ing. Gunther KegelCEO Pepperl+Fuchs GmbH, Mannheim

Member of the Fieldbus Foundation Board of DirectorsChairman of the FF European Executive Advisory Council

Foundation Fieldbus Topologies for Intrinsically Safe (IS) Installations

2© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

Content

1. Necessity of topology elements

2. Preferred general fieldbus topology

3. IS fieldbus topologies

4. Vision

5. DART technology

3© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

Information Pyramid

ERP

MES

DCS

FIELD

4© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

Automation Pyramid

Sensors und Actuators

Interfaces

PLC

DCS

HMI

Information Q

uantity

Information Q

uality

5© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

Power Supply and Wiring Block Topology

HOST Single pointof failure (o.c.)

Single pointof failure (s.c.)

HOST

T

6© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

...Fieldbusex-ipower supply

Typical IS fieldbus topology in 2000

7© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

Fieldbusbarrier FieldbusbarrierFieldbusbarrier

Termination

Typical IS fieldbus topology in 2004

Fieldbuspowersupply

ex-ispurs

8© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

Topology Requirements

1. Avoid single point of failure architectures.2. Integrate Shielding and Grounding.3. Guarantee protection against short circuit

and open circuit of fielddevice connections.4. Provide current limitation to fielddevices.5. Gain maximum cable length and acceptable

voltage drop to add actuarial reserves.

9© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

Fieldbus topology for IS installationsIn general the same arguments apply for ISinstallations in regards of grounding; shielding; protection etc.In addition the topology has to provide the ISisolation between safe areas (e.g. control room) and hazardous areas (e.g. field).As fieldbus devices are low power devices anyhow, IS is a very appropriate method for fieldbusinstallations in hazardous areas.Today two different IS installation concepts for fieldbus are existing:

“True intrinsic safety“-Concept“High Power Trunk“-Concept

10© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

“True Intrinsic Safety“-Concept

H1 T

24VTrunk:Ex-i FISCO Gas Group IIC…15 V / 100 mAEx-i FISCO Gas Group IIB….15 V / 200 mA

FISCO Fieldbus Powersupply

Spur:Ex-i FISCO Gas Group IIC .. >10 V / 30 mA

ActiveJunction Box

11© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

“High Power Trunk“-Concept

H1 T

24V Trunk:Ex-e ……………. < 31 V / 500 mA

Powersupply

Spur:Ex-i FISCO Gas Group IIC .. >10 V / 30 mA

FieldbusBarrier

12© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

Characteristics

TrunkProtection

SpurProtection

IsolationTrunkSpec.

Power SupplyRedundancy

True Intrinsic Safety Ex-i FISCO Power

Supply17 V

200 mA1) NO

High Power Trunk Ex-e FISCO

Power Supply+FieldbusBarrier

31 V500 mA2) YES

1) Values are for gas group IIB only.2) Other devices with (e.g. 25 V / 360 mA) are also available

13© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

VISION

“True Intrinsic Safety”-Concept and “High Power Trunk”-Concept are both widely accepted and have to be seen as prooventechnology.What about a “True Intrinsically Safe High Power Trunk”-Concept?In other words: Can we achieve high power on an intrinsically safe trunk?

14© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

VISION

H1

T

24V

Spur:Ex-i FISCO Gas Group IIC .. >10 V / 30 mA

Trunk:Ex-i ……………. > 24 V / 350 mA

15© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

Advantages

Single Ex-i harzadous area protection concept, no Ex-e wiring.High Power Trunk offers more cable length through accepting bigger voltage drops along the trunk cable.Simplified Active Junction Box (compared to Fieldbusbarrier).Spurs remain FISCO protected.

16© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

24 V / 350 mAIntrinsically Safe !?

17© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

Principle of Intrinsic Safety

The energy in an intrinsically safe system is limited to a value that is not capable of causing ignition in normal operation and fault condition in the surrounding hazardous atmospheres by sparks (opening, closing, short circuit, short circuit to earth)

“ i ”

U

R L

C

18© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

Principle of Intrinsic Safety

The classic protection method is to limit voltage, current, power, inductance and capacity in an intrinsically safe system to a constant value.

-> The results are documented in “Ignition curves”

19© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

Physics of an arc

Rectangular source, U= 25V, I= 500mA, 1000m cable, cable break at 500m

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 10 20 30 40 50t [ µs]

U [V

]

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

I [A

]

criticalphase

initialphase

Funken -strom IF

Funken -spannung UFSpark voltage

Spark current

20© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

DART

DART is a new intrinsically safe concept developed and approved by Physikalische

Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) in Braunschweig and Pepperl+Fuchs Mannheim.

Dynamic Arc Recognition &Termination

The principle of DART is the detection of the development of an arc and the fast shut down of

power source and/or sink.

21© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

DART basic structure

24V

Ididt

UT

10V

tp

UU

12V

500mA

Power Supply Trunk Cable ActiveJunction Box

R’ l

22© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

VISION

H1

T

24V

Spur:Ex-i FISCO Gas Group IIC .. >10 V / 30 mA

Trunk:Ex-i ……………. > 24 V / 350 mA

DARTPower Supply

DART

23© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

Conclusion

TrunkProtection

SpurProtection

IsolationTrunkSpec.

Power Supply

Redundancy

True Intrinsic Safety

Ex-i FISCO Power Supply

17 V 200 mA1) NO

High Power Trunk

Ex-e FISCO

Power Supply+FieldbusBarrier

31 V500 mA2) YES

DART Ex-i FISCOPowerSupply

24 V350 mA YES

24© 2007 Fieldbus Foundation

Want to know more about DART and fieldbus?

Visit the Interkama 2008 in Hannover!