m odern e nglish g rammar a nd u sage 1
TRANSCRIPT
ww
w.e
Pow
erPo
int.co
m
1
MODERN ENGLISH GRAMMAR AND USAGE
www.ePowerPoint.com
2
ww
w.e
Pow
erPo
int.co
m
WHAT IS GRAMMAR Boring or interesting? Etymologically “grammar” related to
“glamour”. An interesting, exciting subject of study. Dictionary defines “ grammar as the
rules by which words change their forms and are combined in other senses.
English grammar is the body of rules that describe the structure of expressions in the English language. This includes the structure of words, phrases, clauses, and sentences.
3
ww
w.e
Pow
erPo
int.co
m
GRAMMARUse of word grammar in other senses: As a subjectA book of grammarProficiency/ mastery in the languageTransformational generative
grammar as a linguistic theoryConsciously learned explicit set of
rules for learning a foreign language.
In mother tongue rules are subconsciously internalised.
4
ww
w.e
Pow
erPo
int.co
m
GRAMMAR IMPLICIT AND EXPLICITUnacceptable sentencesDue to wrong use of plural, article,
preposition, noun etcOne who can make acceptable
sentences but cannot explain why they are unacceptable has implicit knowledge of grammar.
Those who can distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable and also explain the rule that have been violated has explicit knowledge of grammar.
5
ww
w.e
Pow
erPo
int.co
m
LINGUISTIC ABILITY
Ability to use the language and produce acceptable sentences- Grammar A Implicit or internalized knowledge of rules (native speakers)
Use the metalanguage to explain the rules and process involved- Grammar B explicit knowledge of rules formal or technical talk -Grammar B (native /foreign language learners)
6
ww
w.e
Pow
erPo
int.co
m
PRESCRIPTIVE GRAMMARSpeech of educated native
speakers of English.Unacceptable or rejected as
incorrect or bad English by some grammars.
Other grammars consider them as acceptable -found in current usage.
Prescriptive grammar lays down the rules for use of a language.
7
ww
w.e
Pow
erPo
int.co
m
DESCRIPTIVE GRAMMARStates the facts of a language as
they exist and are spoken by a large number of people.
Contains rules / conventions that actually underlie the usage of native speakers.
Records the violations or deviant features in an objective way as a part of changing or current usage.
Distinctions like the natural laws and the laws of the government.
8
ww
w.e
Pow
erPo
int.co
m
TYPES OF GRAMMARLinguist’s grammar
Study language as a system of signs.
Learner’s grammarIs meant to help the learner to
learn the language.Teacher’s grammar
Contains more information than a learner, higher knowledge.
Occupies a middle ground between the linguist and the learner.
9
ww
w.e
Pow
erPo
int.co
m
NEED TO STUDY GRAMMAR Why should teacher’s/ research
scholar’s study grammar? There has been a debate
Should formal grammar be taught to the learner’s (in Indian situation)?
How much of grammar is to be taught?
How is grammar to be taught? The knowledge of grammar may be
useful in teaching, testing, writing research papers, locating problem areas in learning designing a syllabus .
10
ww
w.e
Pow
erPo
int.co
m
RECOMMENDED READING
Quirk, Randolf. “On Conceptions of Good Grammar”, in The English Language and
Images of Matter. London: Oxford University Press. 1972.
Quirk, Randolf, et al. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
1972.(Sections 1.8to 1.14)
11
ww
w.e
Pow
erPo
int.co
m
USAGE: GRAMMATICALITY In Linguistics, conformity to the
rules of a language as formulated by a Grammar based on a theory of language description.
The concept became prominent with the rise of Generative Grammar in the 1960s, whose primary aim has been the construction of rules that would distinguish between the grammatical or well- formed sentences and the ungrammatical, deviant, or ill-formed sentences of a language.
12
ww
w.e
Pow
erPo
int.co
m
GRAMMATICALITY AND ACCEPTABILITY
Grammaticality should not be confused with notions of correctness or acceptability as determined by prescriptive grammarians.
Grammaticality has been differentiated from ACCEPTABILITY, which is based on the judgements by native speakers as to whether they would use a sentence or would consider it correct .
Judgements about what is acceptable may reflect views that a sentence is nonsensical, implausible, illogical, stylistically inappropriate, or socially objectionable.
13
ww
w.e
Pow
erPo
int.co
m
CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTABILITY
We expect a grammar of a language to clearly say what is “acceptable” and “unacceptable” in the language?
“Correct” and “incorrect” suggest absolute norms, deviations in black and white.
“Acceptable” and “unacceptable” suggest relative norms, fluid and variable according to usage, suggests the possibility of many grey areas.
14
ww
w.e
Pow
erPo
int.co
m
DIFFERENT LEVELS OF UNACCEPTABILITY.
Sentences: Ungrammaticalnot well formed, violating some rule or convention of grammar.
Inappropriate: Linguistic Factors: Use of non standard English – dialects. Informal/ inappropriate registeral variations. Collocational devices. Use of derogatory words
Non linguistic Factors: Psychological, Sociological, Aesthetic- Ambiguous statements.
Semantically odd: not appropriate to the situation.
15
ww
w.e
Pow
erPo
int.co
m
CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTABILITY Grammar books generally give us the
idea of “grammaticality” i.e. What constitutes acceptable sentences on the basis of grammatical rules and conventions.
For dialect, register features, and collocations, standard dictionaries generally give some help for exhaustive knowledge we have to depend on our familiarity with the language.
Social cultural or aesthetic appropriateness is a relative and variable criteria.
16
ww
w.e
Pow
erPo
int.co
m
GRAMMAR AND USAGE
Grammar is, or should be, a description of usage.
Grammar and usage are not different. Traditional prescriptive school grammar
presents rules which militate against actual usage.
Modern descriptive grammar has another handicap- usage is various and keeps on changing. Difficult to furnish all the details of usage.
As teachers/ scholars of English we should be conversant with the facts of English usage.
17
ww
w.e
Pow
erPo
int.co
m
RECOMMENDED READING
Hosali, Priya and Ray Tongue. A Dictionary of Collocations for Indian Users of English. 1989
Leech, Geoffery, et al. English Grammar for Today. London: Macmillan. 1982. (Part A Introduction)
Nihalani, P, et al. Indian and British English: A Handbook of Usage and Pronunciation.
New Delhi: OUP. 1979 Trudgill, Peter and Joan Hannah. International
English: A guide to Varieties of Standard English. London: Edward Arnold. ( pages 106-111.)
ww
w.e
Pow
erPo
int.co
m
18
THANK YOUwww.ePowerPoint.com