LPA Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District

Facilities Master Plan

Governing Board FMP Process Presentation

July 9, 2015

1

50 years

285 people

80 staff dedicated

to education

40+Master Plans

san antonio

sacramento

san diego

irvine

san jose

welcome

fairfield–suisun usd

San Jose San Diego Sacramento Irvine

2

LPA core FMP team

LPA

Jim Kisel

AIA, LEED AP BD+C

Principal

Director of School Planning

Steve Newsom

AIA, LEED AP BD+C

Associate

Project Director

Lindsay Hayward

LEED AP BD+C

Associate

Educational Facilities Planner

San Jose San Diego Sacramento Irvine

integrated

design

process

client-inclusive &

stake-holder driven

a holistic approach to problem solving

that places the client in the center

fostering participation and direct interaction

with the multidisciplinary team of specialists

• FMP is the first step in the facilities improvement process

• recommended every 3-5 years by CDE and to apply for state funding

• important to engage district and community stakeholders

• data driven decision making

• sustainable focus facilitates good stewardship

• development of high performance learning environments

• building upon FSUSD mission and strategic plan

3

create value / district strategic goals

Fairfield-Suisun USD – mission statement

“a premier learning community that empowers each student to thrive in an ever-changing world”

Fairfield-Suisun USD - district goals and major activities for the 2014-2015 school year

goal #1 – implement, support, and monitoring of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)

goal #2 – maintain a safe environment for students and staff

goal #3 – maintain fiscal solvency, liquidity, and effective use of District resources

goal #4 – maintain positive District and community relations

goal #5 – to function as a continually effective Governance Team

4

create value / district facilities master plan goals

1 – focused master plan

• maintenance & repair driven

• proposed scopes managed to an available funding budget

• school & community expectations tempered

2 – comprehensive long term vision

• starts with educational philosophy for how students will learn in the future

• meets District’s goals within the mission and vision statement

• discovers the impact of educational programs to facilities

• phased implementation approach

defining success – a “road map” to the future

5

Budget Estimates

& Prioritization

Final

Facilities Master Plan

Recommendations

create value

facilities master plan components

• Campus Overview

• Existing Conditions

• Health/Life Safety Issues

• Code/ADA Compliance

• Building Systems

• Visual Observations

Facilities Condition

Assessments

• Local Revenue

• State Eligibility

• Voter Approved

Options

• Funding Plan

Scenarios

Financial

Analysis

• Enrollment Trends

• Site Capacities

• Student Loading

Standards

• Attendance Boundaries

• New Development

Demographics

Review

• District Mission Statements

• Guiding Principals

• Student Learning

Methodologies

• Program Standards

• Technology Integration

• Increased Student Outcomes

& Achievement

Educational Vision

& Goals

• Community Stakeholders

• District Staff

• School Site Principals

• Communicate Needs

• Campus Master Plan Concepts

• Build Support for District Goals

Collaboration

Cost Estimates &

Prioritization

Final

Facilities Master Plan

Recommendations

6

7

common themes…inspire curiosity

21st century skills – the 5 c’s

Critical Thinking

Creativity

Collaboration

Communication

Community

common core integration

healthy students / healthy schools

learning environment / learning styles

Visual

Audio

Tactile

Kinesthetic

social & casual learning spaces

business & community linkages

technology transparency

improving student outcomes & achievement goal

enrich lives

program vision exploration

7

8

facilities needs assessment

building upon the good work done to date

for site work, existing buildings and utility systems

upgrade and/or replacement, levels of scope and

improvement recommendations can be assessed to

help the fairfield-suisun unified school district strategize

and prioritize future projects.

prove it / existing facility assessments

• district data / record drawings research

• coordination with previous program goals

• site walks & principal interviews/questionnaires

• deferred maintenance items

• building code / ada / health & life safety issues

• older campus needs, building & utility systems condition

• external & internal landscape and athletic fields assessment

• campus safety & fencing

• energy efficiency & prop 39 funding

• longevity vs. future maintenance costs

critical first step: assembling an accurate existing

facilities database to predict future construction costs

8

facilities needs assessments

educational program vision

implementation planning

prove it / facilities master plan digital deliverable

• executive summary

• guiding principles vision

• educational program standards

• technology readiness

• sq. ft. & physical characteristics

• campus overview

• code, health & student/staff safety issues

• classroom capacity & space utilization

• maintenance & operational efficiency

• building materials & systems condition

• school site master plan diagrams

• cost estimates

• funding source analysis

• scope prioritization

• communication of recommendations

9

inter + act

committees & stakeholder engagement

District Focus Groups

Outreach

Fairfield -Suisun USD

Governing Board

Facilities

Master Plan

Committee

(FMPC)

School Site Input

Elementary School

Programs

4 GB

Site

English Learner

Services

Community Forums

(1 Per Region)

Number of Meetings/Interactions

5 Staff Survey

Public Safety Academy

College & Career Academy

Executive Steering

Committee

(ESC)

ESC

FMPC

Community

Technology Support

Services (TSS)

Child

Nutrition

Maintenance

& Facilities

Special

Education

Secondary School

Programs

Charrette

Charrette

1 day

1

1

1

1 ea.

Principal Surveys

School Site

Focused Interactions

High School Students

1+1

1x ON- LINE

ASB

3

#

Facilities Assessment &

Educational Program Vision

overlay to develop school site master plans

1x ON- LINE

Charrette

Early Childhood

Programs 1

8

10

inter + act

FMP committee members

Facilities Master Plan Committee (FMPC)

(30-45 Committee Members Total – Meets Monthly)

District Participants

• (3) Governing Board Members

• Superintendent

• Asst. Supt. Business Services

• Asst. Supt. Instructional Services & ES/Secondary Directors

• Director Facilities, Maintenance & Facilities Staff

• (6-8) Teachers & Administrators Representatives

(Cross Section of Roles/Disciplines)

• Certificated Employee Representative

• Classified Employee Representative

• Student & PTA Representatives (1-2/HS Attendance Area)

Community Members

• (4-6) Community Leader Representatives

• Governmental Agencies

• (4-6) Business Community Representatives

• Engaged FSUSD Parents

• Community College Representative

• Senior Community Representative

• Tax Group Representative

• Chamber of Commerce Representative

• Real-estate Organizations Representative

(Purpose is to develop District wide master plan program/facilities

vision and standards with a goal to equally weight the total number of

FSUSD and local community participants on the FMPC group.)

11

inter + act

proposed scheduled

12

1. people driven

2. research informed

3. learner centered

4. exploratory

5. transparent

6. implement-able

7. long range

8. regularly updated

we believe that a

sustainable master plan is…

LPA creating sustainable places and spaces that enrich the lives of those who use them

13

Governing Board Discussion…