low energy building design strategy

44
Low Energy Building Design Strategy

Upload: tress

Post on 22-Feb-2016

36 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Low Energy Building Design Strategy. Low Carbon Design Aim. “ minimizing the impact on the wider environment through consuming the minimum resources possible in the building’s construction and operation. whilst providing a healthy comfortable building that meets the occupant’s requirements ” - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Low Energy Building Design Strategy

Page 2: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Low Carbon Design Aim

• “minimizing the impact on the wider environment through consuming the minimum resources possible in the building’s construction and operation

• whilst providing a healthy comfortable building that meets the occupant’s requirements”

• we need a coherent design and evaluation strategy to help us achieve this!

Page 3: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Building & Systems Design

• meeting the needs of occupants (comfort, utility, etc.) whilst considering environmental impact and meeting a host of other sustainability and legal criteria means that building design is a complex process

• fundamentally a building a complex, integrated energy system

• it will not “work” unless properly designed and analysed

• the majority of buildings in the UK are poorly designed: poor occupant comfort, high energy consumption, reliant on systems to overcome basic design faults

• as a start we need to prioritise our design activities …

Page 4: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Design Hierarchy for Low Energy Performance

Form & Fabric

Efficient Systems & Operation

LZC Energy Supplies• Impact on final energy

performance

demand reduction

energy supplies

Page 5: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Design Hierarchy for Low Energy Performance• the point of the previous slide is that the 1st

priority in a low-energy building design should be:

- maximise the energy efficiency of the building by designing out the need for energy consuming systems (heating, cooling, lighting, etc.)

- maximise the energy efficiency of conventional energy consuming systems

- supply/offset energy demands using local zero-carbon sources

Page 6: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

New Build Design Hierarchy for Low Energy

• without radically reducing the demand of a building (in comparison to the present-day standards) it would be almost impossible to achieve zero carbon operation

Page 7: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction Example

Page 8: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction Example

Page 9: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction Example

Page 10: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction

• All buildings have up to 4 basic energy needs:

Page 11: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction

• before deciding on what demand reduction measures it is worth looking at the demands themselves

• enables reduction measures to be prioritised

• as new build regulations change so energy efficiency priorities will change

• thermal electrical

Page 12: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction: Space Heating

• in northern Europe the predominant load in buildings is space heating

• … also the load that can be most effectively tackled

• there are a range of options available depending upon whether a design project is new build or retrofit

• however the basic aims are: – minimise heat loss rate to the

environment (fabric and infiltration)– maximise useful ‘free’ heat gains

Page 13: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction: Space Heating

Qf - fabric

Qi - infiltration

Qs - solar

Q g -

gain

s

ifhgsn

x xr QQQQQQ

dtdC 1

Qh - heat

Page 14: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction: Space Heating

• insulation (walls, windows, doors)

• reduction of infiltration– high quality construction, draft

stripping– MVHR

• maximise useful solar gain– positioning of glazing (south

facing)

Page 15: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction: Space Heating

• overall demand reduction measures are one of the most cost-effective ways to reduce carbon emissions – particularly in older buildings/retrofit projects

• Source: EST

Page 16: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction: Space Heating

1

10

100

1000

Insulation PV

Savings ratio £/tonne (over 30-year life)

Page 17: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction: Space Cooling

• in warmer weather or climates or buildings with high internal heat gains we need space cooling not heating

• note we may have a building that has one set of requirements in winter (minimise heating) and another in summer (minimise cooling) – continental climate

• this tends to be an electrical load, electricity is used for compressors and pumps in the cooling system

• basic aims are:– minimise heat gains from the environment (fabric,

infiltration, solar)– minimise internal heat gains– make use of thermal inertia and ‘free’ cooling

when available

Page 18: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction: Space Cooling

Qs - solar

Q g -

gain

s

ifcgsn

x xr QQQQQQ

dtdC 1

Qi - infiltration

Qf - fabric

Qc - cooling

Page 19: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction: Space Cooling

• shading (prevent solar radiation getting in)

• reflect solar (albedo)• bring in air from outside when T<Ti

• … otherwise prevent unwanted infiltration

• MVHR• insulation (prevent heat gains

through walls)• make use of thermal mass (plus

free cooling)• … or more exotic strategies

– ground cooling– evaporative cooling

Page 20: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction: Space Cooling

• the use of exposed thermal mass is typically employed in buildings (or spaces) likely to experience overheating:

– sunspaces

– areas of high occupancy

– areas with high equipment loads• thermal mass acts like a sponge –

absorbing surplus heat during the day and releasing the heat during the evening

• however to work effectively the release of heat in the evenings needs to be encouraged through flushing of the air inside the building

Page 21: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction: Space Cooling

insulation

exposed mass

daytime: Te > Tm

insulation

exposed mass

evening: Te < Tm

ventilation air

Qs - solar

Page 22: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction: Space Cooling

Thermal Mass Temps.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Hours

Tem

pera

ture

(C)

AmbientAir TempMass Temp

start of night flushend of night flushheat release from mass

heat gain by mass

Page 23: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction: Space Cooling

• useful in preventing overheating however:

– slow response to plant input

– more difficult to accurately control internal conditions (plant pre-heat required)

– risk of under-heating on colder mornings

– surface condensation risk

Page 24: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction: Space Cooling

• thermally massive buildings are highly dynamic thermal systems

• typically rely on thermal modelling to gauge the effects on performance

• … particularly when also dealing with night flush, etc.

Page 25: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction: Space Cooling

• testing thermal mass + night flush strategy with ESP-r

Page 26: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction: Hot Water

• hot water use is very building dependent– very little in offices/shops– medium sized load in dwellings– big load in hotels/hospitals

• there are a variety of measures to reduce the associate energy load

• ‘good housekeeping’:– reducing hot water temperature 60→45oC– Why do we need to supply hot water at 60oC?!

(scalding risk)– to eliminate legionella, just occasionally raise

tank temp to 60oC or use chemical or UV dosing

Page 27: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction: Hot Water

• technology “fixes”: – storage tank and pipe insulation – more efficient heating devices

(heat pumps, condensing gas boilers)

– aerating taps and nozzles (reduce flow of water)

– time limited taps/shower valves (prevent waste)

– ‘grey water’ heat recovery

Page 28: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction: Electricity• as with hot water there

are two main strategies for the reduction in use of electricity

• ‘good housekeeping’:– switching appliances off when

not used (better control– avoiding ‘standby’ mode– awareness of energy use ‘smart

meters’

Page 29: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Demand Reduction: Electricity

• Technology “fixes”:– low-energy appliances

(lighting, entertainment, heating, cooling ….)

– low energy fans and pumps (motors)

– daylight responsive lighting– occupancy sensors in

rooms– ‘active’ smart metering

(demand management)

Page 30: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Energy Supplies• there are two main needs –

heat and electricity (electricity could also supply heating/cooling needs)

• as with demands – available resources need to be analysed before deciding on appropriate supply measures

• … these should be appropriate for the demand of the building!

Page 31: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Energy Supplies

• available ‘renewable’ resources are entirely location dependent

Page 32: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Zero Carbon Electricity

• photovoltaics (PV) (solar resource)

• biomass CHP (biomass resource)

• SWECS (wind resource)

Page 33: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Low Carbon Electricity

• CHP (usually gas powered)– to achieve ‘zero carbon’ operation, resulting CO2 emissions

need to be offset by a zero carbon source

Page 34: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Zero Carbon Heat

• solar thermal (solar resource)

• biomass boiler (biomass resource)

Page 35: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Low Carbon Heat

• CHP (gas powered)• Heat pumps (electricity)• … energy consumption

needs to be offset by zero carbon sources

Page 36: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Evaluating Options...

• there is a wide range of options for demand reduction and energy supplies

• how to choose between them? • this requires performance

evaluation• this is an integral, iterative part

of the evolution of a building design

• this type of design model requires feedback (data) on the likely performance of a system ….

Page 37: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Selecting/designing a system

design team

design process

support environment

selection

implications

Page 38: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Performance Evaluation

• an appropriate support environment for the building design process is building environmental simulation

• simulation is the mathematical modelling of a building operating in realistic dynamic conditions

• allows the design team to assess environmental performance (human comfort, energy consumption, emissions, etc.)

Page 39: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Technical Assessment

• simulation enables a design team to make informed choices on a likely system’s performance accounting for the complex interactions between the fabric-occupants and systems

Page 40: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Technical Assessment

Mathematical model Performance assessment

Page 41: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Exercise – James Weir Building

Page 42: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Exercise – James Weir Building

• develop a “strategy” that would improve the James Weir Building

• this is one of the main teaching buildings in the University – yet is also one of the poorest energy performers, with exceptionally high electricity and space heating demand

• in addition – certain areas of the building (computer labs, lecture spaces in summer) over heat!!

Page 43: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Exercise – James Weir Building

• What could we do to improve this building?

• think about – • the characteristics of the building• uses of the building• constraints on improving energy

performance• feasible improvement measures• costs of improvement measures• ranking improvement measures

Page 44: Low Energy Building Design  Strategy

Group 1 ANDERSON CRAIG Group 5 BURNS NICHOLAS FARGE YANNICK CHARTON AURELIE CORALIE LOWE GRAEME KENNETH LAINE PIERRE SERRI GAUTHIER MCDAID MORNA

Group 2 ARMOUR CRAIG ALEXANDER Group 6 BERGE MAXIME BRESLIN MARC COCHRANE NEIL FLATMAN ROSS LAMBOT HELENE PASCALINE ANDREE LUNDBERG EBBA MENSAH CLAUDE TOSELLI ALESSANDRA

Group 7 WILSON TOM Group 3 ARTHUR SAMUEL DEMANGE SIMON

BELTAGUI HODA LAVIER BERTRAND GAUDISSART SIMON MICHEL MAURICE RAIHAN HASHIR MACDONALD MICHAEL BICEGO MATHIEU Group 8 BONEY ADAM

DENOMME CHARLOTTE MARIE STEPHANIE Group 4 BARTON ROSS LLAMBIAS SEGOLENE

CASSELS FRASER RUTNOWSKI BENOIT HANROT ASTRID MACGREGOR GRAEME ZAMBEAUX AMELIE