low cost co-production of cellulose nanofibrils and/or cellulose

21
1 Theodora Retsina CEO

Upload: buinhan

Post on 05-Feb-2017

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Low Cost Co-Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and/or Cellulose

1

Theodora RetsinaCEO

Page 2: Low Cost Co-Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and/or Cellulose

• 1995 – 2005 Engineering services in biomass industries

• 2006 – 2010 Development of technologies lab/pilot

• 2011 – 2014 Pilot / Demonstration

• 2015 Commercialization

Sugar is the new crude

Our History

Page 3: Low Cost Co-Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and/or Cellulose

SugarsBiomass

Polyethylene

Diesel

Jet Fuel

Gasoline

Acetaldehyde

Acetic Anhydride

Ethanolamines

Polypropylene

Ethyl Acetate

EthaolEthylene Oxide

Ethylene glycol

Vinyl acetate

PET

Ethyl Ether

n-butanol

Ethylene

Fossil Crude

3

Sugar is the New Crude®

Fractionation Fermentation

Nanocellulose

Sugar is the New Crude®

Page 4: Low Cost Co-Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and/or Cellulose

Technologies

AVAP®- Bulk sugar production & conversion – TRL 7 Clean sugars from cellulose & hemicelluloses

Feedstocks: Softwood, hardwood, ag residues

BioPlusTM – Nanocellulose production TRL 7 Pre commercial plant for market development

Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic NanoCrystals and NanoFibrils

GreenPower+® Technologies - Simple process to alcohols TRL 8 Low cost alternative for bolt on or standalone production

4

• Patent portfolio 37 granted ~250 pending

• All key patents granted USA – and at TCP progressing worldwide

Page 5: Low Cost Co-Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and/or Cellulose

Lab tests – 2009

5

Fractionation Autohydrolysis Lignin precipitation

Chemical Recovery Fermentation Testing

Page 6: Low Cost Co-Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and/or Cellulose

Pilot tests - 2010

6

Page 7: Low Cost Co-Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and/or Cellulose

GP+ Alpena Biorefinery

7

April 2011

7

Page 8: Low Cost Co-Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and/or Cellulose

CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL 8

Nov 2013

Alpena Biorefinery - First Ethanol Shipment

THANK YOUCity of AlpenaDevereGeorgia TechGranBioMEDCMichigan Forest CouncilMichigan TechNancy HoNMTC (RDP CCML WFState of MichiganTenaskaUS DOE

1st Commercial woody cellulosic ethanol in USA

Page 9: Low Cost Co-Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and/or Cellulose

2014 - 2015 - GP3+ Cellulosic Ethanol Demonstration Plant

Page 10: Low Cost Co-Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and/or Cellulose

2010 - 2016 - Thomaston Biorefinery, GA, USA

Pre-commercial Integrated demos of our 3 technologiesAVAP – GP3+ - Nanocellulose

3.5 BDT/d feedstock - over 8000 hours operationNext Step – Scaling to 50 bd t/d

Page 11: Low Cost Co-Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and/or Cellulose

First Steps to Commercialization 2014, 2015, 2016

Alpena GreenPower+ FirstPre-commercial Biorefinery Nov 2013

Sugar is the New Crude®

Norampac CabanoGreenBox+ commercial plant June 2016

First AVAP commercial license for clean C6 production for chemicals - sold! 2014

First sale of commercial nanocellulose quantities - Thomaston plant April 2015

DOE support

Page 12: Low Cost Co-Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and/or Cellulose

The necessary ingredients

• Vision – why are we doing this?• Steady governmental policies• Technology team

– Not only a science team – Driven – inspired - committed – with technical integrity!– Agile

• Enough financing• Leadership – this is not for the faint at heart!

• Decision making ability• Networking – Supply chain alliances• Understanding biomass

• “sisu” – irrational perseverance

12

Page 13: Low Cost Co-Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and/or Cellulose

Phase Action Pitfalls

Prefeasibility A good idea Ignore marketOver optimistic timelines

13

Page 14: Low Cost Co-Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and/or Cellulose

Phase Action Pitfalls

Prefeasibility A good idea Ignore marketOver optimistic timelines

Lab Bench scaleexperiment

Unrealistic conditionsFailing to realize this

14

Page 15: Low Cost Co-Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and/or Cellulose

Phase Action Pitfalls

Prefeasibility A good idea Ignore marketOver optimistic timelines

Lab Bench scaleexperiment

Unrealistic conditionsFailing to realize this

Process Synthesis Design what the process will look like and conduct TEA

Skipping this stepUnrealistic process design, too many stepsTorturing biomassDesign by inexperienced team

15

Page 16: Low Cost Co-Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and/or Cellulose

Phase Action Pitfalls

Prefeasibility A good idea Ignore marketOver optimistic timelines

Lab Bench scaleexperiment

Unrealistic conditionsFailing to realize this

Process Synthesis Design what the process will look like and conduct TEA

Skipping this stepUnrealistic process design, too many stepsTorturing biomassDesign by inexperienced team

Pilot Larger batch experimentation

Ignore the importance of recycle streams, concentration & energy integrationNot piloting all the steps

16

Page 17: Low Cost Co-Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and/or Cellulose

Phase Action Pitfalls

Prefeasibility A good idea Ignore marketOver optimistic timelines

Lab Bench scaleexperiment

Unrealistic conditionsFailing to realize this

Process Synthesis Design what the process will look like and conduct TEA

Skipping this stepUnrealistic process design, too many stepsTorturing biomassDesign by inexperienced team

Pilot Larger batch experimentation

Ignore the importance of recycle streams, concentration & energy integrationNot piloting all the steps

Pre-commercial Demo

Continuous fullyintegrated operation

Using non-industrial equipmentNot following process with simulation tools to validateFailure to revisit process synthesis

17

Page 18: Low Cost Co-Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and/or Cellulose

Phase Action Pitfalls

Prefeasibility A good idea Ignore marketOver optimistic timelines

Lab Bench scaleexperiment

Unrealistic conditionsFailing to realize this

Process Synthesis Design what the process will look like and conduct TEA

Skipping this stepUnrealistic process design, too many stepsTorturing biomassDesign by inexperienced team

Pilot Larger batch experimentation

Ignore the importance of recycle streams, concentration & energy integrationNot piloting all the steps

Pre-commercial Demo

Continuous fullyintegrated operation

Using non-industrial equipmentNot following process with simulation tools to validateFailure to revisit process synthesis

Commercial plant Building on scale and startup

Not going through steps aboveReinventing the wheelWrong team – SEALS not Corporate managers

18

Page 19: Low Cost Co-Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and/or Cellulose

Phase Action Pitfalls

Prefeasibility A good idea Ignore marketOver optimistic timelines

Lab Bench scaleexperiment

Unrealistic conditionsFailing to realize this

Process Synthesis Design what the process will look like and conduct TEA

Skipping this stepUnrealistic process design, too many stepsTorturing biomassDesign by inexperienced team

Pilot Larger batch experimentation

Ignore the importance of recycle streams, concentration & energy integrationNot piloting all the steps

Pre-commercial Demo

Continuous fullyintegrated operation

Using non-industrial equipmentNot following process with simulation tools to validateFailure to revisit process synthesis

Commercial plant Building on scale and startup

Not going through steps aboveReinventing the wheelWrong team – SEALS not Corporate managers

Continued Operations

Continuous improvement

Think that we are thereFail to allow for startup curve 19

Page 20: Low Cost Co-Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and/or Cellulose

Reducing CAPEX & OPEX

• CAPEX– Retrofit existing industrial facility

– Right size

– Process Yield

• OPEX– Logistics

– Energy integration

– Process Yield

– Co-product

20

Page 21: Low Cost Co-Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and/or Cellulose

Thank you

21

Theodora Retsina