low-carbon development activities: country cases …. d2s1_bulganmurun tsevegjav_ase… · gggi...
TRANSCRIPT
GGGI Low-Carbon Development Activities: Country Cases from Mongolia and the Philippines Asia-Europe Environment Forum Annual Conference: 7 September, 2017
1
Guidelines for Speakers
Conference Title: Asia-Europe Sustainable Development Goals and Financing:
No Longer Business as Usual
Date: 6-7 September
Venue: Intercontinental Westlake in Hanoi, Viet Nam
On behalf of the conference co-organisers, we would like to express our gratitude for your valued role in our event.
We consider you an integral part of our team, and your knowledge and experience will undoubtedly contribute to
the success of our conference.
We have prepared a set of guidelines that are designed to assist in your preparations for your role in the
conference. The purpose of this document is to support common understanding in creating the enabling
conditions for all attendees of the conference to feel comfortable and the space for exchanging experiences and
mutual learning.
Programme Structure
There are two types of sessions in the programme complemented by refreshments.
x Thematic Sessions
Each session begins with a series of thematic presentations of 10-15 minutes by invited speakers,
followed by Q&A. Moderators may introduce presenters by title only, and can also draw on the speaker
bios which will be published in the conference booklet distributed to all participants of the conference.
x Thematic Roundtables
Thematic Roundtables begins with a series of input presentations (around 10 minutes) from invited
Speakers. As they are designed to promote interaction between the audience and the speakers, there is
more time allocated for a discussion following speaker presentations. The objective of the Roundtables is
to gather action points on how different stakeholders could contribute to the implementation of
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Guidelines for Speakers
Please kindly note that we have invited participants and audience members based on their previous experience or
knowledge on the SDGs. The level of knowledge may vary, but we would kindly recommend against speaking in
depth on the history of MDGs / SDGs, what they are, and how the negotiation process was run.
When planning your presentation, you should always keep in mind the question: What is the key message (or three key points) for the audience to take away? Please select up to 3 main messages you wish to convey and
share it with your audience, illustrated by examples.
Please note we have allotted time for each speaker to give a 10-15 minute presentation. We recommend that your
PowerPoint should:
x Contain up to 10 slides;
x Use a font size of no less than 30 point
This 2nd point is particularly important as it prevents too much information from being presented on any one slide.
This whole approach avoids the dreaded ‘Death by PowerPoint’. If you wish to provide more information, we
encourage you to create a bespoke hand-out to provide to the audience after your presentation.
Thank you in advance for your contribution to a successful conference. Should you have any questions or concerns please email Ms. Grazyna PULAWSKA at [email protected]
Outline:
1. Brief introduction about Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI)
2. Case-1 from Mongolia: Green Educational Building
3. Case-2 from Philippines: Green Business Practices among Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs)
3
Our Vision A resilient world of strong, inclusive and sustainable growth. Our Objective GGGI Member countries move towards a model of green growth. While this will be differentiated for countries, at its core will be strategies that simultaneously achieve poverty reduction, social inclusion, environmental sustainability and resource security. 1.Strengthened national green growth planning, financing and institutional frameworks. 2. Increased green investment flows. 3. Improved multi-directional knowledge sharing and learning between countries on green growth.
GGGI at a Glance
Mexico UAE
Qatar
Ethiopia
Indonesia
Mozambique
Peru
Paraguay
Senegal
Norway
Denmark
United Kingdom
Australia
Republic of Korea Headquarters
China
Jordan
Costa Rica Guyana Colombia
Papua New Guinea
Thailand
Vanuatu
Kiribati
Fiji
Morocco
Uganda
Laos
Hungary
Nepal
Myanmar
Rwanda
Vietnam
Philippines
Cambodia
India
Mongolia
Multi-Sectoral Member Countries
Green City Development Land-Use Water Energy
Maximizing Impact through Four Thematic Priorities:
GGGI Thematic Areas and Links to SDGs
Mongolia Case: PPP for Green Educational Buildings A
10 | Green Development Overview
Current technology
Alternative technology
HEAT SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT MODEL
GREEN KINDERGARDEN
NATIONAL WATER DATABASE
Vision Developing Public Transport Oriented Green City
Goal (2020)
1. Reduction of GHG Emission in Transport Sector by 10%2. Increase Public Transport Modal Share by 20% 3. Improve Average Traffic Speed for Bus by 20%
Main Task
Bus Route System
Fare system&Smart card
Intelligent Transport System (ITS)
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
GREEN PUBLIC TRANSPORTSix interrelated components: 1. Technology options analysis for
kindergartens (with GTC-K) 2. Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) of selected
options 3. Assessment of potential financing
mechanisms for selected options 4. Demonstration of public kindergarten
design specifications 5. Full suite of construction plan for
demonstration of public kindergarten 6. Guideline on green engineering,
procurement and construction (EPC) of public education buildings
i
Capacity Building of Multiple Stakeholders and Cost benefit analysis of green public kindergarten Facilities in Mongolia
May 2016
i
Financing Mechanisms for Green
Public Education Buildings in
Mongolia
July, 2016
Prepared by:
i
Adapting Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) to the Green Building Principles August 2016
Mongolia Case: PPP for Green Educational Buildings
Mongolia Case: PPP for Green Educational Buildings
Financial Specifications: • Initial cost of investment is 25% greater than Business-As-Usual (BAU)
Model • Operating costs, including heating, electricity, water, and waste water
treatment, were significantly lower, reducing the pressure on state and local budgets. Total operating and maintenance cost is half of the BAU model.
• Remove up to 120 tons of CO2 emission by reducing the use of coal for heating.
• Indirect benefits are improve indoor air quality, health of children and staff
• Project payback period is 14 years
Philippines Case: Green Practices among MSMEs in Food Processing Sector
Are there any green practices among MSMEs? If yes, is greening profitable?
What is role of MSMEs in the Philippine economy and what does green practice mean?
Which MSMEs in coffee, cocoa, fruits and nuts processing sectors have green practices?
What are green practices levels (change of mindset, affordable purchase or technological
solutions)? How green practices are beneficial and
profitable to these businesses (SWOT and CBA)?
Philippines Case: Green Practices of MSMEs in Food Sector
Greening Practices of MSMEs
87
iv. Case stuDies
OVERVIEW OF ALL CASE STUDIES
This research contains two types of case studies: the main case study, with figures obtained from the cost-benefit analysis; and the mini case study, that is more qualitative in nature.
Showcased in this research are four main case studies and eight mini case studies. The table below presents all twelve case studies at a glance.
Among these case studies, it was commonly observed that:
• Most common green practice among the MSMEs are in the areas of waste management, energy conservation, and efficient use of water; it is hoped that more concrete initiatives in the area of emission will be pursued as these MSMEs attain further development;
• All the MSMEs seem committed to institutionalizing their respective green practices beyond token compliance, as seen in their varied levels of investments, most of which have been categorized under levels 2 and 3;
• Such investments may have been prompted by these MSMEs’ appreciation of the importance of greening the value chain processes which has concrete economic and non-economic benefits for the MSMEs themselves;
• The varying level of investments depended on priorities decided by the respective firms, taking into consideration these investments’ economic impact on the business operations, their contribution to the attainment of the specific goals of the business;
• Leadership of MSMEs has played an important role in sustaining the implementation of these green practices; quite expectedly, business owners who have professed to be staunch supporters of environment-friendly practices made sure that their respective firms adopt a similar mindset; on whether the employees of these MSMEs are able to bring home such mindset and influence their respective household is already beyond the scope of this study;
• The MSMEs – across all the clusters covered – share common basic value chain processes that include production, processing, packaging, and distribution;
• Among the relevant Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the green practices of the covered MSMEs were able to demonstrate their support only to:
Coffee
Cacao
Processed Fruits (Banana)
Processed Nuts (Pili)
CLUSTER NAME OF FIRM LOCATION/REGION TYPE
Freefood Coconut Manufacturing Company Malagos Agri Ventures Corp.
JAC Farms
Hineleban Foundation, Inc.
Fresh Start Organics Villa Socorro Agri-Eco Village & Farm Resort
Real’s Food Products
Bahay Kalipay
Aloha Natural Farm
J. Emmanuel Pastries
Greenminds, Inc.
Rising Pili
Davao City, Region XI
Davao City, Region XI Kalinga Province, CAR
Bukidnon, Region X
Bacolod, Negros Occidental, Region XVIII
Laguna, Region IV-A
Puerto Princesa, Palawan, Region IV-B
Puerto Princesa, Palawan, Region IV-B
Puerto Princesa, Palawan, Region IV-B
Camarines Sur, Region V
Cagayan De Oro, Region X
Romblon, Region IV-B
Main
Mini
Main
Mini
Mini
Main
Mini
Mini
Mini
Main
Mini
Mini
as seen in some of the businesses’ conscious adoption of green architecture principles for better ventilation and more efficient lighting, and the provision itself of jobs to locals; and
as seen in these MSMEs deliberate efforts to reuse, recycle and upcycle components in their production process.
Key findings • Green practices among MSMEs in coffee, cocoa, fruits
and nuts processing sector the Philippines is at infancy stage (limited green practices and low response at the moment)
• Greening intervention does not always require investment
• Greening is profitable (CBA results in 58%-75% cost savings and IRR 19%-224%)
• Growing market demand, strong potential to expand and limited resources (SWOT analysis)
• Needs more leveraging support from the Government, cluster associations and development partners in know-how/research, financing and market expansion.
Thank You
www.gggi.org
Follow our Activities on Facebook and Twitter
Bulganmurun Tsevegjav Program Integration Lead GGGI Philippines [email protected] T: +63 915 762 1230 / + 976 9912 2030 Bulganmurun Tsevegjav is a Program Integration Lead at the Green Growth Planning and Implementation Division of the Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI). Based in Manila, she currently works at Philippine Country Program, providing professional expertise on ongoing program activities where GGGI is continuing to build its in-country assistance directed towards the paths to inclusive growth and climate resilience together with the Philippine Government. She also manages a project with the Department of Trade and Industry to assess benefits of green interventions among Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises in the Philippines.