Logistics : Behavior, Replication, Duplication, Integrity and assurance-- Driving resilience with fearSunday, September 11, Two Thousand and SixteenAbhishek Dhoop Sood

Inertia without the understanding of doubt creates more doubt that can lead to failure with no assurance. Not withstanding personal experience cannot create the need for doubt, problems or future issues. Inertia, compromised regardless of due process and mitigation; creating policies that cannot insure the future is in control in the present. One who controls the present, controls the future, long regarding assurance that the present is clearly viewed and accounted for. When doubt is eliminated in the present time, the level and measure of control sustained is calculated by assurance that doubt is eliminated.

Mitigation control systems is a thirst quencher when accepted. The reluctance of using such measures when creating a methodology of due process, based on experience, yours or someone else s conquers the requirement that existing decision making was adept and contrasted via channels that required immediate action of sustainability. Using the requirement process for solutions that adhere to quality control systems that can have the effect on the outcome of a project can not withstand the test of times if made without constituting assurances that systems developed prior, and future can withstand the deliverance models once expected, under a previous leadership role, yours or other. Migration systems that are not mitigated will result in due process, and failure to adhere to current norms will constitute to loss of control, disaster recovery and problem solvers. Without tokens of appreciation, logistics cannot be practiced. Proof in the pudding, if it worked the first time, it has to work the second time.

Control systems, delivering production and merit based on experience and practical mediums driven by insight, if negated will create a void of deliverance and production values that will have a domino effect reflected on poor decision making, and lack of experience. Visionaries do not lack the threat of control or power, but, systems created that have proven working grounds of developing foundations that can uphold the measure of time. Pointing out deliverance modelscannot be forked from foundations that are not created, in the first place. Tertiary measures, of adjustment and coherence models that stem patch management of someone else s work, one mitigated cannot be constituted into new foundations unless, previous models are still in place. Precisely measured by the threshold of foundation, for a previous system, that has been compounded into a resilient “invigorating” system, measured by those who do not understand what they have created. Case in point, if you don't know what it is, you must have created something new; that has neverbeen created before. A fictional friction of how the mind can lie to itself, especially if advocated and re-enforced by new members of your team. Creating a false ideology, in the information age, used for commerce and trade, government and military and policy driven rights for all civilians. What is forgotten, cannot be remembered. What is doubt of the future, is certainly, fear of the present. And what is the future, without the understanding of the present. Undoubtedly, a concept

of fear that generates plenty of inertia to produce a value system of no merit. The “no merit system”.

By partisan means that result in output that a foundation, any foundation, resulting in deliverance of 'new concepts that were created by the existing, original models, is assurance that new systems can be created without leaving any doubt.