log 211 course development overview 15 july 2011 log 211 “supportability analysis” course...

1LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011

LOG 211 “Supportability Analysis”Course Development Overview

Presented to the

Life Cycle Logistics (LCL) Functional Integrated Product Team (FIPT)

Presented by

Patrick M. Dallosta, CPLPerformance Learning DirectorDefense Acquisition University


Discussion Topics

• Key Personnel

• LCL Competency – DAU Curriculum Crosswalk

• Current Status/Schedule

• Course Description

• Course Content / TLOs & ELOs

• Projected Throughput

• Impact on Training/PLD Assessment

• Questions & Answers


Key Personnel

Course Manager Jim Curry

Course Manager Regional Representatives

Capital and Northeast: Jim Curry

West: Andre Murphy

Midwest: Barry Berty

South: Greg Walker

Mid-Atlantic: James Boone

GLTC Instructional Systems Specialist James McDaniel

LCIC Performance Learning Director (PLD) Patrick Dallosta

LCIC Director for Logistics and Sustainment Bill Kobren

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011

LCL Competency – DAU Curriculum Crosswalk

Competency/Course

LOG 101

LOG 102

LOG103

LOG200

LOG201

LOG 204

LOG 206

LOG 211

LOG 215

LOG235

LOG236

LOG340

LOG350

Logistics Design Influence

Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) Planning

Product Support and Sustainment

Configuration Management

Reliability & Maintainability Analysis

Technical/Product Data Management

Supportability Analysis

Principal course that addresses the competency Deployed course/significant upgrade in progress Courses where the competency is a major learning point New course in development/planning

Legend:

4


LOG 211 Course Objectives

• Role of Supportability and Supportability Analysis in focusing the wide range of technology, engineering, logistics, and management concepts and tasks involved in the design and sustainment of complex systems.

• Role of Logistician in the Supportability Analysis - Systems Engineering process

• Importance of implementing Reliability, Availability and Maintainability (RAM) and Supportability principles early in the development of systems requirements

• Impact of RAM/Supportability on the design process and the effectiveness of the product support strategy.


User Needs/Technology Opportunities

& Resources

System Redesign/Improvement

Have Support

RequirementsBeenMet?

DetailedProduct SupportAnalysis

SustainingSystemSupport

UserFeedback

LifetimeSupport

Design for Support

Technology/Standards Evolution and COTS Products Market Surveillance and on-Going Technology Assessment, DMSMS

Cost as an Independent Variable (CAIV): Design to Affordability Analysis (Strategic Decision Making)

Maintenance Concept

Capabilities

• Product Support Management• Design Interface•Maintenance Planning• Supply Support• Test/Support Equipment• Technical Data•Manpower/Personnel• Training/Training Support• Facilities/Infrastructure• PHS&T• Sustaining Engineering• Computer Resources Support

System ProductSupport Package

TechnologyRefreshment

Reliability & MaintainabilityModeling, Prediction, Allocation & Analysis

Level of Repair Analysis(LORA)

ConditionBasedMaintenance +(CBM+)

Fault TreeAnalysis (FTA)

Failure Mode,Effects, andCriticality Analysis(FMECA)

MaintenanceTask Analysis(MTA)

Reliability Availability

MaintainabilitySupportabilityAffordability

GEIA-STD-0007Database

Design Criteria

Materiel Solution Analysis- Operational Mode Summary/

Mission Profile- Use Study- Comparative Analysis - RAM-C Rationale Report- Failure Definition/Scoring- Supportability Objectives

Supportability Metrics

GEIA-STD-0007Database

Technology Development

- Functional Analysis

- Support Synthesis

- Trade Off Analysis

Design the Support Support the Design

No

Yes

RQMTs

Data Input

ASR PDR CDR DT&E OT&ESFR FCA PCA PRR

Design Reviews / Test and Evaluation

Supportability Analysis Life Cycle Framework


LOG 211 Competency/Proficiency Analysis

SUPPORTABILITY ANALYSISCOMPETENCY/PROFICIENCY

1. Analysis Framework

2. Logistician’s Role

3. JCIDS Process

4. KPP Development

5. Supportability Objectives

6.

Maintenance Concept

7. Design Criteria

8. Logistics Product Data/Database

9. R&M

Modeling, Analysis

10. RAM

Trade off Availabif

11. Product Support Analysis

12. Product Support Package

13. Failure Modes Effects and Criticality Analysis

14. Fault Tree Analysis

15. Condition Based Maintenance

16. Reliability Centered Maintenance

17. Level of Repair Analysis

18.

Maintenance Task Analysis

19.Supportability Design Review

20. Supportability Demonstration

SUPPORTABILITY ANALYSIS (Note 7)

Use analysis tools and techniques of supportability in the systems engineering process and in sustainment planning * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Evaluate and select appropriate supportability analysis tools. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Apply appropriate techniques and information to maintain readiness and operational capability * * * * * *

Apply M&S in support of logistics decisions. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Evaluate performance outcomes related to supportability and Life Cycle Cost * * * * * * * * * *

Evaluate impact of changes to policies, procedures and tools. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Select and implement appropriate types/methodologies of supportability/sustainment analyses. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Identify supportability issues and determine solutions. * * * * * * * *

Conduct supportability analysis to define support requirements to influence design improve readiness and minimize Life Cycle Cost.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Analyze system/equipment performance data to resolve technical or procedural problems. * * * * * *

Develop functional requirements, usage forecasts, failure rates, and initial repair and replacement factors. * * * * * * * * *

Assess the impact of supportability and affordability analyses on sustainment planning and execution. * * * * * * * *

Apply and monitor the Reliability Centered Maintenance * * * * * * * * * * *


LOG 211 Terminal Learning Objectives (TLO)

•Develop Hardware and Software Supportability Objectives/Maintenance Concept• Establish Supportability Metrics• Translate metrics into design criteria

within SE process•Generate Logistics Product Data/GEIA

Std-0007 Database•Develop R&M Modeling, Prediction,

Allocation and Analysis•Conduct R&M, Availability,

Cost/Affordability Trade-off Analysis •Recognize FMECA and FTA processes

and contribution to supportability•Recognize value of PHM/RCM in the

CBM process and supportability

•Conduct Level of Repair Analysis (LORA)•Conduct Maintenance Task Analysis •Conduct Software Supportability

Analysis•Recognize the elements of the Product

Support Package as an output of Supportability Analysis•Recognize the process and impact of

Supportability Design Reviews• Evaluate suitability in terms of

supportability and adequacy of Product Support Package•Recognize analytical processes

necessary for Post-Fielding Sustainment•Generate a supportability analysis

product (Capstone)


DRAFT LOG 211 Course Outline

Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

AM

Topic 1Introduction/Admin/Student IntroductionTopic 2Supportability Analysis/Framework/Logistician’s Role

Topic 6CASE STUDY:M&S Exercise Logistics Product Data/GEIA Std-0007 Database Topic 7CASE STUDY:M&S ExerciseR&M Modeling, Prediction, Allocation and Analysis

Topic 10Failure Modes Effects and Criticality Analysis /Fault Tree AnalysisTopic 11Condition Based Maintenance/Reliability Centered Maintenance

Topic 14CASE STUDY:Maintenance Task Analysis Topic 15CASE STUDY:Software Supportability Analysis

Topic 19Capstone MaterialsTopic 20Course Completion/ Graduation

PM

Topic 3CASE STUDY: Supportability Objectives/Maintenance Concept Topic 4Supportability MetricsTopic 5Translating Metrics into Design Criteria

Topic 8CASE STUDY:M&S ExerciseDiagnostic & Prognostic CapabilitiesTopic 9CASE STUDY:M&S ExerciseR&M, Availability, Cost/Affordability Trade-off Analysis

Topic 12Product Support Analysis/ Product Support Package Topic 13CASE STUDY:M&S ExerciseLevel of Repair Analysis (LORA)

Topic 16Supportability Design ReviewsTopic 17CASE STUDY:Evaluate SuitabilityTopic 18Post-Fielding Sustainment Reviews X


LOG 211 Development Schedule

• GSA release of Request for Quotation (RFQ) July 06 2011

• Vendor Questions July 11 2011

• RFQ Responses Due July 25 2011

• DAU Evaluation Aug 05 2011

• Anticipated Award Aug 26 2011

• Instructor Pilot July 16-20 2012

• Student Pilot Sep 24-28 2012

• FY 13 Deployment (Core Plus) Nov 2012


PLD Assessment

• LOG 211’s course content may be a challenge students with minimal math and engineering skills, as well as a ‘traditional logistics’ perspective.

• Mitigation Approach• Prerequisites

• LOG 103 Reliability, Availability and Maintainability• CLL 012 Supportability Analysis• CLL 008 Designing for Supportability in DoD Systems

• Gaming & Simulation• Five technical areas• Well designed tasks• Cumulative learning• Building “Capstone” Take-Away for future use


PLD Assessment

• LOG 211 complex development effort• Complexity of subject matter • Use of a Case Study• Gaming & Simulation to facilitate learning technical areas• Extensive Instructor and Student Materials• Capstone Materials

• LOG 211 students will have a unique ‘hands-on’ appreciation of the interfaces between • Design and Sustainment• Systems Engineering and Logistics Engineering

• PM, SPRDE and T&E Career fields will review LOG 211 Performance Work Statement (PWS) • Gain consensus• Recognize/incorporate perspectives• Serve as Subject Matter Experts


Impact on Training

Directly addresses Policy Requirements• Weapons Systems Acquisition Reform Act (WSARA) of 2009• DoD 5000.02• USD(AT&L) Memo “Reliability Availability and Maintainability (RAM)”• USD(AT&L) Memo “Better Buying Power”• DTM 11-003, “RAM Planning, Analysis, Tracking and Reporting”

Provides students insight into Systems Engineering – Logistics engineering processes• Affordability• Importance of Design Interface • Impact of RAM on performance and sustainment• Product Support Management and IPS Elements

Cross-Career Field training • PM• SPRDE / T&E• LCL


Q & AThank you for the Opportunity to Serve

the Life Cycle Logistics (LCL) Functional Integrated Product Team

14


Back Up


NOTIONAL Projected Throughput

LOG 211 FY12 FY 13 FY 14

Graduates 60 300 3000

# Classes 2 10 100Status Pilot Core Plus Certification

LCL 30 200 2600

SPRDE 10 60 300

PM 10 20 30

T&E 10 20 100

Great Interest in LOG 211 from SPRDE, PM and T&E Career Fields


FY13 LCL Certification Curriculum

• Application/case based• GS 9-12 & E7-O4

Level II Certification

LOG 201Intermediate Acquisition Logistics


35 hours, online


LOG 200Intermediate Acquisition Logistics LOG 235

Performance Based Life

Cycle Product Support

LOG 235Performance Based Life

Cycle Product Support

35 hours on-line

4.5 days classroom

P

LOG 211Supportability

Analysis

LOG 211Supportability

Analysis

4.5 days classroom

ACQ 202Intermediate

SystemsAcquisition

ACQ 202Intermediate

SystemsAcquisition

PACQ 203Intermediate

SystemsAcquisition

ACQ 203Intermediate

SystemsAcquisition

4.5 days classroom

LOG 206Intermediate

Systems Sustainment

LOG 206Intermediate

Systems Sustainment

40 hours, online

NOTE: There would still be NO

prerequisites for LOG235

24 hours on-line

P25 hrs, on-line

Level I Certification

ACQ 101Fundamentals of Systems Acquisition

Management

ACQ 101Fundamentals of Systems Acquisition

Management

• Knowledge based• GS 5-9 & E7-O3 26 hrs, on-line

30 hrs, on-line

P

2 Continuous Learning Modules:

PBL & Designing for Supportability

2 Continuous Learning Modules:

PBL & Designing for Supportability

LOG 103Reliability,

Availability & Maintainability

LOG 103Reliability,

Availability & Maintainability

LOG 102Systems

SustainmentManagement

LOG 102Systems

SustainmentManagement

1-3 hrs ea, on-line

LOG 101Acquisition Logistics

Fundamentals

LOG 101Acquisition Logistics

Fundamentals

28 hrs, on-line

• Case/scenario based• GS 13-14 & E7-O5

Level IIICertification

P

PLOG 350

Enterprise Life Cycle Logistics Management

LOG 350Enterprise Life Cycle Logistics Management

LOG 340Performance

Based Life Cycle Sustainment

LOG 340Performance

Based Life Cycle Sustainment

8.5 days classroom

8.5 days classroom

P = Prerequisite

Level I “Core Plus”Courses & CL Modules

(See DAU catalog for details)

Level I “Core Plus”Courses & CL Modules


Level III “Core Plus”Courses & CL Modules


Level III “Core Plus”Courses & CL Modules


New Cert Courses

Level II “Core Plus”Courses & CL Modules

(Includes LOG 204 CM Course& new LOG 2xx Tech Data Mgt Course)

Level II “Core Plus”Courses & CL Modules

(Includes LOG 204 CM Course& new LOG 2xx Tech Data Mgt Course)

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 18

Background Defense Science Board Task Force on Developmental T&E

"Operational effectiveness is the overall degree of mission accomplishment of a system when used by representative personnel in the environment planned or expected for operational employment of the system considering organization, doctrine, survivability, tactics, vulnerability and threat.

"Operational suitability is the degree to which a system can be satisfactorily placed in field use, with consideration given to reliability, availability, compatibility, transportability, interoperability, wartime usage rates, maintainability, safety, human factors, manpower supportability, logistics supportability, documentation, training requirements, and natural environmental effects and impacts.

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 19

Defense Science Board (DSB) Findings

• Problems– High Suitability failure rates were caused by lack of a disciplined systems

engineering process, including a robust reliability growth program, during system development.

– RAM shortfalls are frequently identified in DT, but program constraints (schedule and funding) often preclude incorporating fixes and delaying IOT&E.

• Solutions– Identify and define RAM requirements during the JCIDS process, and incorporate

them in the Request for Proposal (RFP) as a mandatory contractual requirement – Strengthen Program Manager accountability for RAM-related achievements– Make RAM, to include a robust reliability growth program, a mandatory

contractual requirement and document progress as part of every major program review

– Ensure an adequate cadre of experienced RAM personnel is part of the Service acquisition and engineering office staffs


AT&L/SSE Memorandum for President, DAU “Addition of RAM Courses to Selected DAWIA Certification Career Paths”

“The RIWG identified a critical need for improved knowledge within the DAWIA workforce…and recommends…”

“…adding courses…to selected career fields…” (Per Attachment)*

“…consider the establishment of a Learning Center of Excellence to support…RAM education and training via mechanisms such at Rapid Deployment Training, Targeted Training, and CoP/SIA products…”

“Request…the O-FIPT consider these recommendations and provide a strategy to address them within 30 days…”


RIWG Analysis of DAU CurriculumCourse and Content Recommendations

CAREER FIELD LEVEL I LEVEL II LEVEL III RECOMMENDATIONContracting CLE 301 Add as Core

IT CLE 301

Life Cycle Logistics CLE 301 LOG 203

Production, Q&M CLE 301, LOG 203 Change to Core from “As Assigned”

Program Management CLE 301 LOG 203 Add as Core

SPRDE PE CLE 301 LOG 203 Add as Core

SPRDE S&T LOG 203 CLE 301 Add as Core

SPRDE SE LOG 203 CLE 301 Change to Core from “As Assigned”

T&E CLE 301 LOG 203 Add as Core

Requirements Officer CLM 041 RQM 110 (Pilot) TBD Add RAM Concepts to Level IIAdd RAM Tasks to Level III

COURSE SPECIFICS

LOG 203 Strengthen Course (classroom, cross-career)

CLE 301 Strengthen Course (classroom, cross-career)

POTENTIAL NEW COURSE (Section 852)LOG 211 Supportability Analysis

36 hours classroom instruction – builds on and expands LOG 201 and LOG 203’s focus on Supportability Analysis, Maintenance Planning, RAM, and Life Cycle Cost – includes rigorous mathematical analysis.


LCL Career Field Implications

• Human Strategic Capital (HCS) Competencies– Logistics Design Influence– Integrated Logistics Support Planning– Product Support & Sustainment– Configuration Management– Reliability & Maintainability Analysis– Technical/Product Data Management– Supportability Analysis

Path AheadInsert / Strengthen “R” “A” & “M” in the Career Field Architecture and Curriculum via updates and course revisions

• Workforce Reconstitution– Recruit and hire personnel for T&E

and RAM related positions– Ensure Key Leadership Positions (KLP)

include T&E and RAM personnel– Retain and recognize RAM expertise– Develop and train RAM expertise – Strengthen and apply RAM expertise

Path AheadEstablish “Workforce Improvement” Memo tenants as focus areas for Implementation.Ensure consistency with other Career Fields

LOG 103 LOG 211


LOG 211 TLO/ELO


TLO/ELO 1. Course Administration/Introduction and Team Building

1.1 Verification of student enrollment/personal information

1.2 Familiarization with DAU/classroom features, health/safety, food/beverage, post access,

1.3 Completion of course prerequisites

1.4 Introduction of course objectives and content.

1.5 Team building via personal introductions

24


TLO/ELO 2. Develop Hardware and Software Supportability Objectives/Maintenance Concept

2.1 [Relate] the process of determining User Needs to Supportability and Supportability Analysis

2.2 [Analyze] the role of the Concept of Operations (CONOPS) in developing Supportability Objectives and the Maintenance Concept.

2.3 [Relate] the importance of the Use Study in developing Supportability Objectives

2.4 [Develop] Supportability Objectives consistent with User input

2.5 [Develop] the Maintenance Concept consistent with User input and Supportability Objectives

2.6 [Relate] the importance of the Maintenance Concept in conducting Supportability Analyses and providing Product Support

2.7 [Relate] the importance of the Maintenance Concept in conducting Product Support Analyses

2.8 [Examine] the importance of the Maintenance Concept in developing the Product Support Package

2.9 [Examine] the continuous review of the Maintenance Concept to ensure effective support given changes in user requirements and design changes.

2.10 [Assess] the impact of Supportability on both design and sustainment domains

25


TLO/ELO 3. Establish Supportability Metrics

3.1 [Relate] the importance of Supportability Metrics in Supportability and Supportability Analysis

3.2 [Derive] Supportability Metrics consistent with Supportability Objectives and User input

3.3 [Examine] how Supportability Metrics will be reviewed, tested and evaluated

3.4 [Assess] the impact of Supportability Metrics on Supportability and Supportability Analysis

26


TLO/ELO 4. Translate Metrics Into Design Criteria Within SE Process

4.1 [Relate] the Systems Engineering (SE) process to Supportability and Supportability Analysis

4.2 [Analyze] the Supportability Metrics as system design requirements

4.3 [Derive] design criteria consistent with system design requirements

4.4 [Assess] the impact of establishing design criteria on Supportability and Supportability Analysis

27


TLO/ELO 5. Generate Logistics Product Data/GEIA Std-0007 Database

5.1 [Relate] the Logistics Product Data/GEIA Std-0007 Database to Supportability and Supportability Analysis

5.2 [Generate] Logistics Product Data

5.3 [Create] a Logistics Product Data Database

5.4 [Assess] the impact of Logistics Product Data/Database on Supportability and Supportability Analysis

28


TLO/ELO 6. Conduct R&M Modeling, Prediction, Allocation and Analysis

6.1 [Relate] Reliability & Maintainability (R&M) Modeling, Prediction, Allocation and Analysis to Supportability and Supportability Analysis

6.2 [Apply] Reliability & Maintainability Modeling

6.3 [Apply] Reliability & Maintainability Prediction

6.4 [Apply] Reliability & Maintainability Allocation

6.5 [Apply] Reliability & Maintainability Analysis

6.6 [Apply] Logistics Product Data/Database

6.7 [Assess] the impact of Reliability & Maintainability (R&M) Modeling, Prediction, Allocation and Analysis on Supportability and Supportability Analysis

29


TLO/ELO 7. Conduct R&M, Availability, Cost/Affordability Trade-off Analysis

7.1 [Relate] Reliability & Maintainability (R&M) Availability, Cost/Affordability Trade-off Analysis to Supportability and Supportability Analysis

7.2 [Apply] Reliability & Maintainability (R&M) Availability, Cost/Affordability Trade-off Analysis


7.4 [Assess] the impact of Reliability & Maintainability (R&M), Availability, Cost/Affordability Trade-off Analysis on Supportability and Supportability Analysis

30


TLO/ELO 8. Examine FMECA and FTA processes and their impact on Supportability

8.1 [Relate] Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) and Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) to Supportability and Supportability Analysis

8.2 [Distinguish] the differences between FMECA and FTA

8.3 [Examine] the Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) process

8.4 [Examine] the Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) process

8.5 [Assess] the impact of Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) and Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) on Supportability and Supportability Analysis

31LOG 211 Supportability Analysis Kick-Off Meeting June 29-30 2010


TLO/ELO 9. Examine diagnostic/prognostic capabilities in the CBM+ process and their impact on Supportability

9.1 [Relate] diagnostic and prognostic capabilities to the Condition Based Maintenance Plus process

9.2 [Distinguish] the differences between diagnostic and prognostic capabilities

9.3 [Apply] diagnostic and prognostic capabilities as part of the Condition Based Maintenance Plus process


9.5 [Assess] the impact of diagnostic and prognostic capabilities in Condition Based Maintenance Plus (CBM+) process on Supportability and Supportability Analysis

32


TLO/ELO 10. Examine RCM processes and contribution to (CBM+)

10.1 [Relate] Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) to the Condition Based Maintenance Plus process

10.2 [Examine] Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) as part of the Condition Based Maintenance Plus process

10.3 [Assess] the impact of Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) on Supportability and Supportability Analysis

33


TLO/ELO 11. Recognize PHM processes and contribution to CBM+

11.1 [Relate] Prognostic and Health Management (PHM) to the Condition Based Maintenance Plus process

11.2 [Examine] Prognostic and Health Management (PHM) as part of the Condition Based Maintenance Plus process

11.3 [Assess] the impact of Prognostic and Health Management (PHM) on Supportability and Supportability Analysis



TLO/ELO 12. Conduct Level of Repair Analysis (LORA)

12.1 [Relate] Level of Repair Analysis (LORA) to Supportability and Supportability Analysis

12.2 [Relate] Level of Repair Analysis (LORA) to the Maintenance Concept

12.3 [Relate] Level of Repair Analysis (LORA) to Product Support Analysis

12.4 [Relate] Level of Repair Analysis (LORA) to the Product Support Package

12.5 [Apply] Level of Repair Analysis (LORA) to the system design


12.7 [Assess] the impact of Level of Repair Analysis (LORA) on Supportability and Supportability Analysis

35


TLO/ELO 13. Conduct Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA) (Case Study)

13.1 [Relate] Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA) to Supportability and Supportability Analysis

13.2 [Relate] Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA) to the Maintenance Concept

13.3 [Relate] Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA) to the Level of Repair Analysis (LORA)

13.2 [Relate] Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA) to FMECA and FTA Analyses

13.2 [Relate] Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA) to Reliability & Maintainability Modeling, Prediction, Allocation and Analysis

13.3 [Relate] Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA) to Product Support Analysis

13.4 [Relate] Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA) to the Product Support Package

13.5 [Apply] Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA) to the system design


13.6 [Assess] the impact of Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA) on Supportability and Supportability Analysis



TLO/ELO 14. Conduct Software Supportability Analysis (Case Study Review)

14.1 [Relate] Software Supportability Analysis to Supportability and Supportability Analysis

14.2 [Examine] Software Supportability Analysis


14.4 [Assess] the impact of Software Supportability Analysis on system design and Product Support



TLO/ELO 15. Examine the PS Analysis Process and the elements of the PS Package as an output of Supportability Analysis

15.1 [Relate] Product Support Analysis process to Supportability and Supportability Analysis

15.2 [Examine] the Product Support Analysis process in identifying Product Support Package elements

15.3 [Examine] the Product Support Package in support of continuing sustainment

15.4 [Assess] the impact of Product Support Analysis and Product Support Package on Supportability and Supportability Analysis

38


TLO/ELO 16. Recognize the process and impact of Supportability Design Reviews

16.1 [Relate] Supportability Design Reviews to Supportability and Supportability Analysis

16.2 [Examine] the Systems Engineering (SE) design review process and milestones

16.3 [Relate] Supportability design review criteria

16.4 [Evaluate] system design compliance to requirements

16.5 [Assess] the impact of Supportability Design Reviews on Supportability and Supportability Analysis

39


TLO/ELO 17. Evaluate Suitability in terms of Supportability and adequacy of Product Support

17.1 [Relate] Suitability to Supportability and Supportability Analysis

17.2 [Relate] Test & Evaluation/Supportability Demonstration to system design, Supportability and Product Support

17.3 [Evaluate] Supportability Demonstration Case Study outcomes

17.4 [Assess] the impact of Supportability Demonstration on Supportability and Supportability Analysis

40


TLO/ELO 18. Recognize The Critical Analytical Processes Necessary For Post-Fielding Sustainment

18.1 [Relate] Post-Fielding Sustainment to Supportability and Supportability Analysis

18.2 [Examine] the post-fielding analytical process for continuous assessment of sustainment adequacy

18.3 [Examine] major factors impacting sustainment adequacy

18.4 [Assess] the impact of post-fielding analysis on Supportability and Supportability Analysis

41


TLO/ELO 19. CAPSTONE

Option 1: Generate a comprehensive supportability analysis product in support of assigned task; students conduct the task/analysis and report results by task area.

Option 2: Generate a comprehensive list of supportability and supportability analysis issues and processes for student discussion

42


Instructor Certification Process/Course Deployment

• Instructor Qualification Process • First take the Course as a Student• Observe (Sit-In) the Course with a Certified Instructor.

• Instructor/Student Training• “Train the Trainer – March 2011• Faculty Pilot (Instructor Validation) scheduled 4-8 April 11• Student Pilot scheduled 1-5 AUG 11

• Initial fielding in FY-12 as “elective” @ Belvoir campus

• FY-12 Instructors - Curry, Brown, Dallosta, Simcik

• Objective of 5 offerings @ Belvoir during FY-12

• FY-12 (OCT11-SEP12) Belvoir instructors certify Regional reps

• Level II Certification Requirement starting FY-13 (OCT 2012)

• FY-13 Instructors (qualified @ each Region)

log 211 course development overview 15 july 2011 log 211 “supportability analysis” course...

Documents

techniques of supportability

supportability principles

supportability objectives6

supportability design

new course

analysis framework2

log 102log103 log200log201log

use analysis tools