locke’s second treatise i.liberalism ii.nationalism iii.socialism/marxism

19
Locke’s Second Treatise I. Liberalism II. Nationalism III. Socialism/Marxism

Upload: sophie-hall

Post on 29-Dec-2015

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Locke’s Second Treatise I.Liberalism II.Nationalism III.Socialism/Marxism

Locke’s Second Treatise

I. Liberalism

II. Nationalism

III. Socialism/Marxism

Page 2: Locke’s Second Treatise I.Liberalism II.Nationalism III.Socialism/Marxism

II. Liberalism

Ascendance of liberalism around the world today

That is, globally we’ve seen an upsurge in political movements committed to the ideals of liberalism

Page 3: Locke’s Second Treatise I.Liberalism II.Nationalism III.Socialism/Marxism

II. Liberalism

Definition In United States,

liberalism means: Hillary Clinton, Jesse

Jackson, Al Sharpton, Ted Kennedy

Page 4: Locke’s Second Treatise I.Liberalism II.Nationalism III.Socialism/Marxism

II. Liberalism

Historically, liberalism is built on 2 key ideas: Limited Government

It was the political solution to the struggle for religious toleration

Attempt to keep politics out of religion. The government should not worry about the state of men’s souls

Give freedom of religion to the people

Why is this a good idea?

Page 5: Locke’s Second Treatise I.Liberalism II.Nationalism III.Socialism/Marxism

II. Liberalism

A key component of limited government is: Rights

Theoretical underpinning to the notion of religious toleration is that individuals have rights against the state

We each have a right not to be interfered with by the government or by other people

These rights are natural – they accrue to us simply by the fact that we are human beings

Page 6: Locke’s Second Treatise I.Liberalism II.Nationalism III.Socialism/Marxism

Suppose you are a District Attorney in a community that is composed of easily recognizable majority/minority communities.

A member of the majority community has been killed and witnesses have reliably identified a member of the minority community as the perpetrator, but the police have been unable to find the exact person

The majority community is screaming for vengeance and on the verge of rioting.

We know that in the course of the riot, at least 10 people from the minority population will be killed in mob violence.

As the DA you suggest the following course of action to the mayor:

Page 7: Locke’s Second Treatise I.Liberalism II.Nationalism III.Socialism/Marxism

In order to avert the riot and save lives, you take a member of the minority community at random, accuse that person of the crime, and stage a very public arrest/execution

As the mayor, what do you do?

Page 8: Locke’s Second Treatise I.Liberalism II.Nationalism III.Socialism/Marxism

II. Liberalism Rights mean that no matter

how good the consequences of a particular action may be, these consequences cannot override individual rights

Why rights? Each individual possesses

dignity Each of us is priceless Roots are in the rise of

Christianity Secularized form – in lieu of

soul premise – treat people as ends, not as means to an end

Every human being has infinite weight, so can’t use any calculation to justify hurting some for the greater good

Page 9: Locke’s Second Treatise I.Liberalism II.Nationalism III.Socialism/Marxism

II. Liberalism

So one component of liberalism is limited government

The second component is capitalism By capitalism, we mean the idea that as long as a

transaction has no negative diseconomies and is mutually advantageous, the transaction is permissible

A deal made between two consenting parties and no one is getting hurt, the state should not get involved in the transaction

Page 10: Locke’s Second Treatise I.Liberalism II.Nationalism III.Socialism/Marxism

II. Liberalism

The market is a private place where people voluntarily dispose of their own property

Locke will present two arguments – one secular, one religious – to show where this right comes from

The overall idea justifying these economic rights is roughly parallel to our political rights in that the state should not interfere with people doing what they want to do with their property

Page 11: Locke’s Second Treatise I.Liberalism II.Nationalism III.Socialism/Marxism

II. Liberalism

Note, the argument itself need not be limited exclusively to property and thus exclusively the purview of the (political) right wing E.g., sexual freedom, drug freedom arguments

could work equally well Since the world is embracing variants of this

view today, an examination of its historical evolution and philosophical premises is both warranted and educational

Page 12: Locke’s Second Treatise I.Liberalism II.Nationalism III.Socialism/Marxism

II. Liberalism

The key idea linking to the two strains is the primacy of the individual

That is, the individual is the basis of power – political, economic, social.

Political power does not come from divine right or the rule of the stronger, but the will of the people

Page 13: Locke’s Second Treatise I.Liberalism II.Nationalism III.Socialism/Marxism

II. Nationalism

The French Revolution, and to a lesser extent, the American Revolution destroyed the ideas underlining feudal political arrangments, most particularly the idea of the divine right of kings and aristocracy

In positing that power comes from below, from the people, these revolutions helped forge the idea that these disparate individuals have broader social connections with each other

Page 14: Locke’s Second Treatise I.Liberalism II.Nationalism III.Socialism/Marxism

II. Nationalism

The French Revolution brought to the fore the idea of a French people united in a French nation

Initially, Napoleon could frame his moves across Europe as liberalizing, that is, as attempts to rid peoples of illegitimate monarchies

One unintended consequence of this, of course, is that French domination then helped forge national unities among the conequered peoples (as we saw in the case of Spain last week).

Page 15: Locke’s Second Treatise I.Liberalism II.Nationalism III.Socialism/Marxism

Revolutions of 1830

After Napoleon’s final defeat at Waterloo, his abdication, the Bourbon line was restored as rulers of France -- Louis XVI’s brother was installed and he ruled as Louis XVIII until 1820

In 1820, another brother was installed as Charles X

Page 16: Locke’s Second Treatise I.Liberalism II.Nationalism III.Socialism/Marxism

Revolutions of 1830

Charles X attempted to rewind the clock and act as previous kings had ruled (ie., on the basis of divine right rather than as a constitutional monarchy constrained by the will of the people.

By 1830, another period of severe economic distress (high food prices, unemployment, and deteriorated living conditions).

Strained relations between the Chamber of Deputies (akin to a parliament) and Charles led to Charles dissolving the Chamber, clamping down on press freedom, and call for new elections under new rules favoring the crown

Page 17: Locke’s Second Treatise I.Liberalism II.Nationalism III.Socialism/Marxism

Revolutions of 1830

These moves in turn sparked widespread revolt in Paris.

The Chamber refused to acknowledge the king’s decree

Charles calls in the military to put down the uprising and the military instead withdraws from Paris

On 29 May, the revolutionaries had control of Paris

Page 18: Locke’s Second Treatise I.Liberalism II.Nationalism III.Socialism/Marxism

Revolutions of 1830

New decree from the Chamber of Deputies:

“France is free. Absolutism has raised its flag and the heroic population of Paris put it down. Paris, when attacked, has by arms caused the triump of the sacred cause...”

Page 19: Locke’s Second Treatise I.Liberalism II.Nationalism III.Socialism/Marxism

Revolutions of 1830

Charles initially tried to regain control of Paris by appointing the duc of Orleans as Lieutenant General of Paris

He attempts to have his grandson recognized as King and then abdicates the throne

On 7 August the throne was declared vacant by the Chambe of Deputies and they offered the crown to the duc of Orleans, who took the crown and ruled as Louis Phillippe under a constitutional monarchy

End of Bourbon rule in France