locally developed coordinated public transit-human services
TRANSCRIPT
Locally Developed Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services
Transportation Plan
Ohio Department of Transportation
Office of Transit
January 15, 2009
Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Marianne Freed AdministratorODOT, Office of Transit
Welcome and Introductions
3
Webcast Participants - Contact Information
• To Pose Questions and Offer Comments and Ideas
• Email Address:– Kim White, Training and Compliance Officer
ODOT, Office of Transit
History and Requirements
Joshua Gearhardt
ODOT, Office of Transit
4Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
SAFETEA-LU• The Transportation Reauthorization Bill passed in 2005
• Added New Federal Transit Administration Programs
• Revised some existing programs
• Final FTA Circular issued May 1, 2007– 9045.1-
www.fta.dot.gov/documents/FTA_C_9045.1_New_Freedom.pdf
– 9050.1-www.fta.dot.gov/documents/FTA_C_9050.1_JARC.pdf
– 9070.1F-
www.fta.dot.gov/documents/C9070.1F.pdf
5Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
New and Revised Federal Transit Administration Programs
• Job Access/Reverse Commute (JARC)
• New Freedom
• Section 5310 (has many names)
– Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities
– Specialized Transportation Program• A.K.A.-Section 16 or Section 16(B)2
6Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
JARC-Section 5316
• Existing Program- Job Access/Reverse Commute– Connect Welfare recipients and low income
to:• Jobs• Employment related training including
education programs and pre-employment training programs
7Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
JARC-Section 5316
• Funding – Directly to large urbanized areas (over 200,000
in population)
– To ODOT for Rural and Small Urban Areas (under 200,000 in population)
– From Discretionary to Formula; based on low income population in UZA
8Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
JARC-Section 5316…
• Operating 50/50 (Federal/Local)
• Capital 80/20 (Federal/Local)
• Planning 80/20 (Federal/Local)
9Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Ohio JARC-Section 5316
• Who Can Apply
– Public Entities providing Public Transit service
– Private non-profit designated by public to provide Public Transit service
– Public entities who are recipients of the Ohio Coordination Program
10Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
New Freedom-Section 5317
• New Program -
Beyond ADA Requirements
– Targeted toward people with disabilities
– Program intent:• Improve public transit service
• Provide transportation alternatives
• Remove barriers
11Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
New Freedom-Section 5317
• Funding
– Directly to large urban areas (over 200,000 in population)
– To ODOT for Rural and Small Urban Areas (under 200,000 in population)
– Operating 50/50 (Federal/Local)– Capital 80/20 (Federal/Local)
12Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Specialized Transportation Program- Section 5310
• Existing Program to provide services to:
– Elderly and people with disabilities:
• Vehicle Acquisition
• Equipment
• Mobility Management
13Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Specialized Transportation Program- Section 5310
• Program Requirements
– Projects must be derived from a “Locally Developed Coordinated Plan”
– Projects must be competitively selected
14Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Specialized Transportation Program- Section 5310
• Funding
– Administered by the State (ODOT)
– Capital only - 80/20 (Federal/Local)
15Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Section 5310 – Specialized Transportation Program
• Who Can Apply for funding in Ohio
– Private non-profit organizations
– Public entities in areas:
• Without non-profit organizations available to provide service
• Lead in Ohio Coordination Program project
16Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Federal Requirements
• Section 5310, 5316 & 5317 applications “derived from a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan”.
• Designated Recipients will have to certify that the plan was “developed through a process that includes representatives of public, private and nonprofit transportation and human services providers and participation by the publicparticipation by the public”.
17Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
What are the REQUIRED elements of the Plan?
• There are four outlined in the federal circular– Assessment of available services that identifies
current transportation providers
– Assessment of current transportation needs for persons with disabilities, older adults and people with low incomes
18Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
What are the REQUIRED elements of the Plan? (Con’t)
– Strategies, activities, and/or projects to address the identified gaps between current services and needs, as well as opportunities to improve efficiencies in service delivery
– Priorities for implementation based on resources
19Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
What are the REQUIRED elements of the Plan? (Con’t)
• “Plans must be developed in good faith in coordination with appropriate planning partners and with opportunities for public participation.” (Page V-2, FTA C
9070.1F, 5/1/2007)
• “The lead agency, in consultation with participants, should identify the process for adoption of the plan.” (Page V-7, FTA C 9070.1F, 5/1/2007)
• The plan should be updated through a regular update cycle, as identified in the Plan.
20Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Who are the Transportation Stakeholders?
• Area transportation planning agencies
• Public transportation providers
• Private transportation providers
• Non profit transportation providers
• Past or current organizations funded under the JARC or Section 5310 program
• Passengers and advocates
• Human service partners
• Others-Anyone interested in Transportation for Target Populations
21Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Why Participate?• Advantages
– You represent your customer base, public transit or human service provider, in their quest for mobility choices
– Will assure that JARC, New Freedom and 5310 funds are used for meeting the particular and unique needs of the residents of your community.
– Resources are limited for everyone and increasing efficiency through coordination makes sense.
22Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Developing the Plan
Robbie Sarles
RLS and Associates
23Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Low Cost/No Cost Methods to Develop a Plan
Use other plans as model• ODOT website• CTAA website• Transit system website• Ohio peers transit systems
o ODOT staff can assist
24Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Low Cost/No Cost Methods to Develop a Plan (Continued)
Follow template• ODOT checklist• WVDOT Coordination Toolkit
o Comprehensive versiono Minimal versiono Plan update version
25Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Low Cost/No Cost Methods to Develop a Plan (Continued)
Supplemental outside assistance• Peer transit system• Larger transit system• Incorporate in neighboring transit system plan• Regional or local planning agencies• Universities / community colleges• Other agencies• Consultants
26Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Low Cost/No Cost Methods to Develop a Plan (Continued)
Types of supplemental assistance• Overview guidance• Technical analysis• Meeting facilitation• Alternative development• Project selection criteria• Objective project evaluation process
27Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
WV Toolkit
A compilation of information and resources• Tool for communities pursuing transportation
coordination• Guide for developing local coordination plans
28Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
WV Toolkit (Continued)
Toolkit contains• Introduction explaining the background for
the toolkit• Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)• Getting started• Coordination briefs• References and resources• Sample Forms and Templates
29Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Step 1: Obtain Basic Understanding of Coordination
Why the emphasis on coordination now? When is coordination effective? Will coordination save me money? What will coordination cost? What are the obstacles to coordination? Who needs to be involved in a coordination
effort?
30Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Step 1: Obtain Basic Understanding of Coordination (Continued)
What problems can coordination address? What are the goals for coordinated
transportation services? How does coordination work? What are the benefits of coordination? Why have some coordinated systems failed? Why have many coordinated systems succeeded?
31Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Step 2: Create an Outline of Your Plan
Coordination Plan Sample Table of Contents• I – Introduction and Overview• II – Inventory and Analysis of Existing Conditions• III – Stakeholder Assessment• IV – Transportation Provider Inventory• V – Identification of Unmet Mobility Needs• VI – Coordination Alternatives• Goals, Objectives, and Implementation Strategies
32Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Step 2: Create an Outline of Your Plan (Continued)
Coordination Plan Sample Table of Contents (Continued) VII – Action Plan
Selection Criteria Prioritization Implementation Strategy
VIII - Adoption and Approval of Plan IX – Plan Update Appendices – Stakeholder and Public Involvement
Record
33Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Step 3: Develop Public Participation / Outreach Strategy
Example of outreach activities Focus groups Public hearings Surveys Interviews Public forums, workshops, open houses Meetings – targeted populations
34Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Step 3: Develop Public Participation / Outreach Strategy
(Continued Notification methods
Newspaper notices Flyers Direct mailing Media public service announcements E-Mail
35Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Step 4: Identify Who Should be Invited to Participate
Identify stakeholders Comprehensive list Core group
36Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Step 5: Collect Population and Demographic Data
Major trip generators Major origin and destination data Typical destinations outside of service area County demographic profiles
37Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Sources of Demographic Data
U.S. Census County Profile County Commissioners Chamber of Commerce Department of Economic Development Agriculture Extension Office School System
38Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Step 6: Inventory Existing Transportation Services
Survey Interviews
39Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Step 7: Conduct Gap Analysis / Needs Assessment
Compare supply of service with demand Identify current coordination efforts Identify challenges to coordination Develop goals for coordination
40Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Step 8: Identify Potential Projects
Describe potential projects
41Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Step 9: Evaluate and Prioritize Projects
Develop selection criteria Evaluate potential projects Prioritize potential projects
42Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Step 10: Create Implementation Strategy
43Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Step 11: Finalize Plan
Document planning process Document results Document public participation / outreach Adopt plan
44Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Step 12: Establish Procedure and Timeline for Updating Plan
45Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Examples of Coordination Activities
• Information and Referral
• Planning
• Grants Management
• Specification Development
• Training
• Joint Policy/Procedure Development
• Passenger Aides/Escorts
• Joint Purchasing
• Vehicle Sharing
• Trip Sharing
• Mobility Managers
• Transportation Brokerages
• Volunteer Pools
• Vehicle, Equipment, and Facility Purchases
• Joint Dispatch and Scheduling
• Call Centers
• Guaranteed Ride Home
• Shared Supplemental Service Contracts
• ITS/GPS
Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop 46
Developing the Plan
Carla Lakatos
Lakatos Group, Ltd.
47Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Target Populations
Elderly Low Income Disabled
48
Benefits to Users and Community
49Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Lakatos Group Experience
Example Agency: Ohio Coordination Project Lead
Background: As an Ohio Coordination Project, serves the public
transportation and human service transportation needs of the County since 1999 (County Commissioners are grantee).
Coordination Project includes 18 participating agencies and is the principle provider of transportation for seniors in Union County.
50Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Lakatos Group Experience
Example Lead Agency: Four County Community Action Commission (CAC)
Background: Plan covered Three of the Four Counties CAC operates an Ohio Rural Transit System in one of the
three counties. There are no public transportation services in the remaining two counties.
The Fourth County elected to develop its own plan.
51Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Key Challenge: Generating local interest in and commitment to
developing a Local Coordinated Plan.
52Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Recommended Initial Steps (continued): Approve work scope and schedule (be careful of tight
timelines!) Provide support in identifying all interested parties and
contact persons Approve process participation plan Identify broad key issues and planning goals (through
input from Steering Committee and other key stakeholders).
Key Challenge: Generating local interest in and commitment to
developing a Local Coordinated Plan.
53Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Key Challenge: Developing & Implementing Specific Strategies to
Assure Effective Planning Process Participation
Goal 1: Raise interested parties’ level of understanding of the planning process and identify how interested parties can become involved.
Examples: Develop database of all interested parties and contact persons. Develop public informational materials – leaflet, website
information Develop a media relations plan.
54Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Key Challenge: Developing & Implementing Specific Strategies to
Assure Effective Planning Process Participation
Goal 2: Ensure interested parties are provided with adequate,
appropriate and meaningful opportunities to participate in the planning process.
Examples: Outreach to stakeholder (surveys, phone calls, etc.) Use of representative Steering Committee and working groups. Distribution of contact information for providing suggestions on
key plan elements.
55Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Key Challenge: Developing & Implementing Specific Strategies to
Assure Effective Planning Process Participation
Goal 2 Examples (continued): Media notices of availability of draft plan for review and
comment. Computer based participation through key websites. Public availability of draft plan at key locations. Public meetings. Assure that the Steering Committee has an opportunity to
review all public comments.
56Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Key Challenge: Developing & Implementing Specific Strategies to
Assure Effective Planning Process Participation
Goal 3: Identify and involve target populations (low income,
elderly, persons with disabilities) in the planning process.
Examples: Identify all agencies that represent or assist these populations
and maintain contact/mailing list. Identify ways of reaching and involving target population.
57Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Key Challenge: Developing & Implementing Specific Strategies to
Assure Effective Planning Process Participation
Goal 4: Use the Steering Committee to the fullest extent to reach
interested parties in the planning area – e.g., citizens, representative agencies, and local public officials.
Examples: Steering Committee reviews stakeholder database, public
informational materials, public comment, survey results, etc. Steering Committee appoints a working group to develop action
strategies. Steering Committee formally accepts and recommends the Final
Coordinated Plan.
58Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Key Planning Challenge:Example Ohio Coordination Project
Issue: The Coordination Project is perceived as a fully effective coordination project. Obtaining full participation of private businesses, public agencies, local providers/funders, and locally elected officials in the planning effort was the key challenge.
Response: The local Chamber of Commerce was contacted and included a survey of its members in the Coordinated Plan. In addition, the participants agreed that further planning participation could be encouraged by requesting that CEOs of all major publically supported agencies, and the County Commissioners to sign off on the final plan.
59Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Key Planning Challenge:Example Ohio Coordination Project
Issue: Realization that certain high-prioritized strategies involved origins/destinations and transportation providers outside of Union County.
Response: Encourage more of a regional approach in future plan updates.
60Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Key Planning Challenge:Example Multi-County CAC
Issue: Two of the counties without Public Transit had limited experience with inter-agency dialogue, understanding of need and transportation coordination. This resulted in challenges in generating stakeholder interest and an understanding of unmet need.
Response: Work closely with stakeholder and working groups. Encourage an ongoing, dynamic planning process. Realize that the planning process itself is a meaningful outcome.
61Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Key Planning Challenge:Example Multi-County CAC
Issue: Finding meaningful coordination opportunities among three (3) very different counties.
Response: Generate prioritized implementation strategies for each county. Assure a dynamic planning process with relatively frequent Plan updates and inter-county communication. Find an early success that can generate further interest in inter-county coordination. Realize that the planning process itself is a meaningful outcome.
62Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Summary Recommendations:
Using a Steering Committee to adopt a process plan and provide oversight will assist in moving the effort forward.
Using available resources such as a planning process outline, stakeholder and community survey instruments, etc. is recommended.
Developing & implementing specific strategies to assure effective planning process participation is critical albeit time-consuming.
Involving locally elected officials and other key influencers to the fullest extent possible will assist with local buy-in.
63Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Developing and monitoring timelines and milestones is important but focus first on generating the fullest participation possible (even if timelines must slip).
Assuring that the planning process is dynamic – that is, providing regular plan updates and reviews will result in the fullest benefits to your community.
Realize that the planning process itself is a meaningful outcome (creating/encouraging inter-agency, public/private dialogue).
Summary Recommendations:
64Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Resources
ODOT www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/Local/Transit/Pages/default.aspx
WVDOTwww.wvdot.com/z_buses/z_buses.htm
CTAAwww.ctaa.org
FTA United We Ridewww.unitedweride.gov
National RTAP www.nationalrtap.org
65Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop
Questions???
66Locally Developed Coordinated Plan Workshop