local control accountability plan update: working with stakeholders and county review
DESCRIPTION
Local Control Accountability Plan Update: Working With Stakeholders and County Review. A Gift of More Local Control. Outcomes. Review LCAP purposes. Review SBE approved template and spending regulations and implications. Sharing data with stakeholders. What are we asking stakeholders? - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Local Control Accountability Plan Update: Working With
Stakeholders and County Review
A Gift of More Local Control
Outcomes Review LCAP purposes. Review SBE approved template and
spending regulations and implications. Sharing data with stakeholders. What are we asking stakeholders? County contacts. Implementation Framework and county
review.
Local Control Accountability Plan Annual Goals That Address Eight Specified
Priority Areas Districtwide goals. Goals for each subgroup; school.
Specific Actions to Achieve Goals Each action must be aligned with budget.
Input and Review Process Advisory groups review and comment. LEA responds to groups’ comments in writing.
Janelle’s Key Points LCFF changes focus from compliance to
performance. LCAP describes what you will do for kids
and what you will spend to do so. Performance driven - what do all kids
need and how will you meet their needs. Local Planning - tells the local story to
stakeholders based on the local needs and goals –
Advice from Janelle’s WestEd Colleagues “Telling the Story” is like a grant
introduction or justification. Stakeholders as audience. It’s like an elevator speech. Who are we -- our values, our priorities, our stakeholders and partners. How we plan to address our needs. How we’ll invest the funds. How the system will support it. How did we get it done?
Priorities May Be Grouped for “Goal” PurposesA. Conditions of Learning
Basic Services Implementation of
State Standards Course Access
B. Pupil Outcomes Pupil Achievement Other Pupil Outcomes
C. Engagement Parent
Involvement Pupil Engagement School Climate
Significant subgroup nowdefined as 30.
Significant subgroup Foster youth defined as
15.
DistrictsCountiesCharters
Template Categories 3-Year LCAP1. Stakeholder Engagement Guides the process planning for
development of LCAP. See guiding questions.
Likely will be completed after LCAP sections 2-3 are complete. Is NOT the narrative for state priority 3,
Parent Involvement.
Template Categories 3-Year LCAP1. Stakeholder Engagement Needs Analysis:
Guiding question 3- What information was made available to stakeholders related to the state priorities and used by the LEA to inform the LCAP goal setting process?
Qualitative and Quantitative
State
wide
Distr
ict
Black
or A
frican
Am
erica
n
Amer
ican I
ndian
or
Alas
ka N
ative
Asian
Filipin
o
Hispa
nic o
r Lat
ino
Nativ
e Ha
waiia
n or
Pacifi
c Isla
nder
Whit
e
Two
or m
ore
race
s
Socio
- ec
onom
ically
Disa
dvan
tage
d
Engli
sh Le
arne
rs
Stude
nts w
ith
Disa
bilitie
s
Foste
r You
th
Recla
ssifie
d as
Flu
ent E
nglish
Pr
oficie
nt
StatePercent Enrollment
DistrictPercent Enrollment
4. Pupil AchievementAreas below State Mean
STAR/CALMAPP ELAProfic ient or Advanced
STAR/CALMAPP MathProfic ient or Advanced
STAR/CALMAPP Sc ienceProfic ient or Advanced
STAR/CALMAPP History/Social Science
Profic ient or Advanced
API Score
API Growth
Percent Completing UC/CSU Required Courses
Percent completing a CTE Course Sequence
Percent Making Progress Towards English Profic iency
(AMAO 1)
English Learner Reclassification Rate
Percent AP Exam Score of 3 or Higher
EAP ELACollege Ready Rate
EAP MathCollege Ready Rate
8. Other Pupil Outcomes(Suggested Measures)
CAHSEE ELA Proficient Rate
CAHSEE ELA 4 Year Pass Rate
CAHSEE Math Profic ient Rate
CAHSEE Math 4 Year Pass Rate
Percent in Cohort Attaining English Proficient
Level (AMAO 2 <5 Years)Percent in Cohort
Attaining English Proficient Level (AMAO 2 >=5 Years)
AP ExamPartic ipation Rate
Distric t Identified Priority
5. Pupil EngagementAreas below state mean
Attendance Rate
Chronic Absenteeism Rate
Middle SchoolDropout Rate
High SchoolDropout Rate
High SchoolGraduation Rate
6. School ClimateAreas below state mean
Suspension Rate
Expulsion Rate
Truancy Rate
California Healthy Kids Survey Results
Distric t Identified Priority
3. Parental Involvement
Distric t Identified Priority
Distric t Identified Priority
1. Basic ServicesAreas below state mean
Credentialed Teacher Rate
Credentialed Teacher Teaching Outside of
Subject Area Rate
Teacher Missassignment Rate
Teacher of English Learners Missassignment Rate
Highly Qualified Teacher Rate
Most Recently Adopted Textbooks Rate
Student Lacking Own Copy of Textbook Rate
Overall Facility Rating
2. Implementationof Sate Standards
Common Core ELA Implementation
Common Core Math Implementation
English Language Development
7. Course Access
UC/CSU Required Course Enrollment Rate
CTE Course Enrollment Rate
AP Courses Offered
AP Course Enrollment Rate
Intervention/Remedial Course Enrollment Rate
Other Course Access Measure
Needs AnalysisSta
tewi
de
Distr
ict
Black
or A
frican
Am
erica
n
Amer
ican
Indian
or
Ala
ska
Nativ
e
Asian
Filipin
o
Hispa
nic o
r Lat
ino
Nativ
e Ha
waiia
n or
Pacifi
c Isla
nder
Whit
e
Two
or m
ore
race
s
Socio
- ec
onom
ically
Disa
dvan
tage
d
Engli
sh Le
arne
rs
Stude
nts w
ith
Disa
bilitie
s
Foste
r You
th
Recla
ssifie
d as
Flu
ent E
nglish
Pr
oficie
nt
StatePercent Enrollment
Distric tPercent Enrollment
4. Pupil AchievementAreas below State Mean
STAR/CALMAPP ELAProfic ient or Advanced
STAR/CALMAPP MathProfic ient or Advanced
STAR/CALMAPP ScienceProfic ient or Advanced
STAR/CALMAPP History/Social Sc ience
Profic ient or Advanced
API Score
API Growth
Percent Completing UC/CSU Required Courses
Percent completing a CTE Course Sequence
Percent Making Progress Towards English Profic iency
(AMAO 1)
English Learner Rec lassification Rate
Percent AP Exam Score of 3 or Higher
EAP ELACollege Ready Rate
EAP MathCollege Ready Rate
8. Other Pupil Outcomes(Suggested Measures)
CAHSEE ELA Proficient Rate
CAHSEE ELA 4 Year Pass Rate
CAHSEE Math Proficient Rate
CAHSEE Math 4 Year Pass Rate
Percent in Cohort Attaining English Proficient
Level (AMAO 2 <5 Years)Percent in Cohort
Attaining English Proficient Level (AMAO 2 >=5 Years)
AP ExamPartic ipation Rate
Distric t Identified Priority
5. Pupil EngagementAreas below state mean
Attendance Rate
Chronic Absenteeism Rate
Middle SchoolDropout Rate
High SchoolDropout Rate
High SchoolGraduation Rate
6. School ClimateAreas below state mean
Suspension Rate
Expulsion Rate
Truancy Rate
California Healthy Kids Survey Results
Distric t Identified Priority
3. Parental Involvement
Distric t Identified Priority
Distric t Identified Priority
1. Basic ServicesAreas below state mean
Credentialed Teacher Rate
Credentialed Teacher Teaching Outside of
Subject Area Rate
Teacher Missassignment Rate
Teacher of English Learners Missassignment Rate
Highly Qualified Teacher Rate
Most Recently Adopted Textbooks Rate
Student Lacking Own Copy of Textbook Rate
Overall Facility Rating
2. Implementationof Sate Standards
Common Core ELA Implementation
Common Core Math Implementation
English Language Development
7. Course Access
UC/CSU Required Course Enrollment Rate
CTE Course Enrollment Rate
AP Courses Offered
AP Course Enrollment Rate
Intervention/Remedial Course Enrollment Rate
Other Course Access Measure
KDS Surveys
On Gathering Input Don’t ask for input that you don’t plan to
use.
Ask questions relevant to your story or your data.
What is your process for reviewing processing and feeding back your input to your stakeholders?
What are Districts Asking? Temecula Valley: How can TVUSD help
more…1. Students to attend school regularly?2. Students to do well in their classes?3. Students to graduate from high school?4. Students to prepare for college and careers?5. Parents to become involved in our schools?
Essential Questions From Madera County What steps might we continue or
implement to: Close achievement gaps? Provide college and career readiness? Achieve master of 21st century learning
skills? Ensure all students graduate? Promote positive learning environments? Expand parent involvement?
What are Districts Asking?
KDS Surveys
December January February March April May June July-August
District Leadership
Board of Education
CAC Board of Education
CAC DELAC Submit for Board Approval
County Review
Principals Business Partners
DELAC CTE GATE PAC
DELAC ELAC DELAC PTOPAC PTO PAC SSC
LCAP (3) SSC PTO CSEAGATE VVTA SSC VVTA
ELAC CSEA School Sites District Leadership
PTO Principals PrincipalsSSC School Sites School Sites
VVTACSEA
School SitesReview
Board of Education Community District Personnel
Budget Development Process
Input
CAC: Community Advisory Committee (SpEd)
CSEA: California State Employees Association
CTE: Career Technical Education Partners
DELAC: District English Language Advisory Committee
GATE: Gifted & Talented Education Advisory Committee
LCAP: Local Control Accountability Plan Information Nights
PAC: Parent Advisory Committee
PTO: Parent Teacher Organizations
SSC: School Site Councils
VVTA: Val Verde Teachers Association
LCAP Next Steps1. Create a Timeline of Events2. Establish Districtwide Committees3. Analyze Student Achievement Data4. Know Research5. Educate Learning Community on LCFF
and LCAP6. Establish LCAP Goals7. Begin Aligning Budget With LCAP
Focus Group Questions In small, grade span alike groups: What two things do you want most for
your child? What do parents need to know most
about this? What are the best ways to get parents
engaged in this new opportunity?
Small Group Discussion How are you engaging your
stakeholders? What are you asking your stakeholders? How are you maximizing attendance? How are you reviewing and processing
and feeding back your input to stakeholders?
Template Categories 3-Year LCAPNeeds (data) Analysis2. Goals and Progress Indicators
8 state priorities; all students + subgroups; schools
District identifies metric and the progress projected (target).
Quantitative or qualitative One goal can fit multiple state priorities
Getting Ready to Write Does your writing team have a common
understanding of terms such as: “Annual update” “Metric” “Different/Improved” “State Priorities”/”LEA priorities”, “LEA goals” “Actions and Services” “Performance Indicators”
Template Categories 3-Year LCAP3. Actions, Services, and Expenditures
Budget references include all funding sources to implement action/service.
A. Actions, services, and expenditures for ALL pupils and subgroups not listed in B.
B. Actions and services above and beyond what is provided for All Students that serve low income, EL, foster youth, and RFEP.
Template Categories 3-Year LCAP3. Actions, Services, and
Expenditures
C. Description of calculation of concentration funds, how the funds are being expended that year, justification for schoolwide or districtwide use.
Template Categories 3-Year LCAP3. Actions, Services, and
Expenditures
D. Description of how services for subgroups identified under (B) are increased or improved in proportion to the increased funding and as compared to services provided to all pupils.
SBE Approved Spending Regulations
SBE Proportionality Scenario
Disconnect in Funding? If “districtwide” means a district may
spend LCFF funds (concentration and supplemental) on all students -- how does a district reconcile or meet a proportionality figure?
Deadline On or before July 1, 2014 (By June 2014),
LEA Board Approval at same meeting and prior to the Budget Approval.
Due to RCOE by July 1, 2014, or 5 days after board approval, whichever is sooner.
Must be adopted by July 1, 2014
LCAP actions must be consistent with local bargaining agreements.
52062.a(4): superintendent shall review school plans and ensure that the specific actions included in the LCAP are consistent with the strategies included in the school plans
Adopt Plan at subsequent public meeting.
Develop proposed plan.
Solicit written comments from public.
Present proposed plan to parent advisory committees for review and comment.
Governing Board solicits recommendations and comments from public at public hearing.
Respond in writing to comments from advisory committees.
Consult with school employees, parents, students and local bargaining units.
If County Superintendent seeks clarification, budget approval is conditional
COE reviews plan content and alignment of budget.
COE reviews plan clarification.
COE reviews plan amendments.
Submits locally approved planto COE five days after adoption.
Responds to COE request forclarification within 15 days.
Considers COE recommendationsin a public hearing within 15 days.
Seeks clarification about contentsof plan from district by August 15.
Submits recommended amendmentsto plan back to district within 15 days.
Reviews plan to determine if it meets requirements (adheres to SBE Template and aligns with district budget).
If plan meets requirements,approves plan by October 8.
If plan does not meetrequirements, does not approve plan; provides support.
OUR REVIEW PROCESS
TEAM WORKING DATES:June 24-26, 2014July 7-11, 2014July 15-31, 2014 (Directors Only)
Our Review Process
TEAM WORKING DATES:June 24-26, 2014July 7-11, 2014
July 15-31, 2014 (Directors Only)
Must be adopted by July 1, 2014
LCAP actions must be consistent with local bargaining agreements.
52062.a(4): superintendent shall review school plans and ensure that the specific actions included in the LCAP are consistent with the strategies included in the school plans
Adopt Plan at subsequent public meeting.
Develop proposed plan.
Solicit written comments from public.
Present proposed plan to parent advisory committees for review and comment.
Governing Board solicits recommendations and comments from public at public hearing.
Respond in writing to comments from advisory committees.
Consult with school employees, parents, students and local bargaining units.
LCAP Development AssistanceRiverside/ Alvord/ Jurupa Contact: Cynthia [email protected]; 951-826-6101 Murrieta/ TemeculaContact: Diana [email protected]; 951-826-6648 Coachella/ Palm Springs/ Desert SandsContact: Mike [email protected]; 951-826-6304 Palo Verde/ Desert Center/ Menifee Contact: Dennis [email protected]; 951-826-6220 Banning/ Beaumont/ San JacintoContact: Barbara [email protected]; 951-826-6632
Corona/ Lake Elsinore/ Val Verde/ RCOEContact: Russ [email protected]; 951-826-6601 RCEA/ CBK/ Imagine/ Gateway/ RiverSpringsContact: Diana [email protected]; 951-826-6648 Perris High/ Perris El/ RomolandContact: Hilma [email protected] ; 951-826-6120 Hemet/ Nuview/ Moreno ValleyContact: Ron [email protected]; 951-826-6797
REVIEW STRUCTURE
Level 1- Expert Team Review by the priority areas.
Level 2- Whole Plan Review by district.
Level 3- Directors’ Final Review and Response to district.
Flexibility…AccountabilityGOAL: Every Student College and Career Ready
• How can we assist our districts in increasing achievement for all students?
Systems ensuring successful implementation of actions and sustainability of impact.
• What does the Research say?
Implementation Science Stages of Implementation
Drivers of Implementation
Implementation Science Level 1- Expert Team Review by the priority
areas. Lens for Plan Review
Ensure goals are based on Needs Analysis. Ensure Goals and Actions will result in progress
indicated based on identified metric. Ensure Actions are research-based.
GOAL: Increased achievement for all students; every student college and career ready.
AN IN DEPTH VIEW OF THE RESEARCH BASED “LENS”
Implementation Science
Competency Drivers
http://www.touchpointdashboard.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/measure.jpg
TEAM WORKING DATES:• June 24-26, 2014
–Teams review plans by priority areas.• July 7-11, 2014
–Teams review “whole” plans by district.– District “contacts” facilitate district LCAP
review.• July 15-31, 2014
– ES and FS Directors conduct final LCFF/LCAP review. –Generate summary and
recommendations.
TEAM WORKING DATES:
• July 31 – August 10, 2014 Cabinet generates letters
–Approved.– Conditional approval based on clarification
needed on budget or plan.– Not approved (provides technical
assistance).
http://zerobearblog.blogspot.com/2012/01/this-duck-business-is-for-birds.html
Through each replication, we become more clear in our implementation efforts.
A Gift of More Local Control
After All – Who’s this Cake for?
Questions?