lng training brazil
DESCRIPTION
lng trainingTRANSCRIPT
1
LNG Training Course
Brazil
December 2007
Sven Lataire
2
Terminal & Transportation Services
Terminal & Transportation Services
Gas Competence Center
Gas Competence Center
Production ServicesProduction Services
Gas Competence CenterTechnical Center
Europe, Middle East, Africa
Gas Competence CenterTechnical Center
Europe, Middle East, Africa
Gas Competence CenterAsia, Oceania
Gas Competence CenterAsia, Oceania
Gas Competence CenterAmerica
Gas Competence CenterAmerica
SpainSpain
FranceFrance
BelgiumBelgium
QatarQatar
PortugalPortugal
ItalyItaly
UKUK
EgyptEgypt
AlgeriaAlgeria
NigeriaNigeria
TurkeyTurkey
OmanOman
GreeceGreece
NorwayNorway
Eq.GuineaEq.Guinea
RussiaRussia
UAEUAE
LibyaLibya
3
Gas Competence Center
Lake CharlesLake Charles
Cove PointCove Point
BostonBoston
SavannahSavannah
TrinidadTrinidad
MexicoMexico
CanadaCanada
Gas Competence CenterAmerica
Gas Competence CenterAmerica
USAUSA
Terminal & Transportation Services
Terminal & Transportation Services
Production ServicesProduction Services
Gas Competence CenterTechnical Center
Europe, Middle East, Africa
Gas Competence CenterAsia, Oceania
Gas Competence CenterAsia, Oceania
4
Gas Competence Center
Gas Competence Center
AustraliaAustralia
MalaysiaMalaysia
KoreaKorea
TaiwanTaiwan
JapanJapan
IndiaIndia
ChinaChina
Gas Competence CenterAmerica
Gas Competence CenterAmerica
Terminal & Transportation Services
Terminal & Transportation Services
Production ServicesProduction Services
Gas Competence CenterTechnical Center
Europe, Middle East, Africa
Gas Competence CenterAsia, Oceania
Gas Competence CenterAsia, Oceania
5
LNG TRAINING PROGRAM
� Day 1
• Welcome & Introduction LNG
• Types of gastankers – Design Criteria LNG tankers
• LNG Terminology/Analysis/behaviour & change of cargo
• Custody Transfer– Ship side: Types of Custody Transfer Instruments
– Shore Side: Principles of LNG Sampling
• LNG Video / Accidents
• Energy calculations
• Lay out and Equipment of LNG vessels
• Cargo handling: Preparation
• Cargo handling: Loading and discharging
• Measurement/Verification/Accuracy
1. Types of GastankersDesign Criteria LNG Tankers
7
Criteria for classification
� Gas carriers can be classified according to different criteria
• Ship survival capability and cargo tank location
– IMO Code
• Pressure / temperature conditions
– Types of gas carriers
» Fully press – Semi Press – Fully ref - …..
• Cargo containment system
– Types of tanks
» Spheric – Rectangular
» Integral – independent - membrane - ……
8
9
Criteria for classification
� Gas carriers can be classified according to different criteria
• Ship survival capability and cargo tank location
– IMO Code
• Pressure / temperature conditions
– Types of gas carriers
» Fully press – Semi Press – Fully ref - …..
• Cargo containment system
– Types of tanks
» Spheric – Rectangular
» Integral – independent - membrane - ……
10
IMO code
� IMO: International Maritime Organization
a United Nations agency that issues international tradestandards for shipping
� IMO code
• survival capability
• flooding/dammage
• location of cargo tanks
• survival requirements
• design criteria
11
IMO code
IMO code
Specifies the required type of ship for each product
4 categories:
• IG
• IIG
• IIPG
• IIIG
�Hazard rating of the cargo
�IG = greatest hazard, e.g.: chlorine
�IIG, IIPG, IIIG: progressivelydecreasing hazards
12
IMO code
Location of cargo tanks in ships of types IIG, IIPG and IIIG
13
IMO code
Location of cargo tanks in a ship of type IG
14
Criteria for classification
� Gas carriers can be classified according to different criteria
• Ship survival capability and cargo tank location
– IMO Code
• Pressure / temperature conditions
– Types of gas carriers
» Fully press – Semi Press – Fully ref - …..
• Cargo containment system
– Types of tanks
» Spheric – Rectangular
» Integral – independent - membrane - ……
15
16
T/P conditions
� Types of gascarriers
Classification according to pressure / temperature conditions
• Fully pressurised Ships
• Semi pressurised Ships
• Ethylene Ships
• Fully refrigerated LPG Ships
• LNG Ships
17
T/P conditions – Fully Pressurized
� Fully pressurized ships
• Type ‘C’ tanks ( carbon steel )
• Design pressure 18 barg (Max 20 Bar)
• Cargo transported at ambient temp
• Tanks are heavy due to their design pressure
• Result: Cargo Capacity - max 6000 m3
• No cooling units
• No insulation
• No secondary barrier is required
• Primarily used to carry LPG and Ammonia
18
T/P conditions – Fully Pressurized
19
T/P conditions – Semi Pressurized
� Semi pressurized ships
• Type ‘C’ tanks
• Max working pressure: 5 to 7 barg
• Temperature min 50 degr C
• Capacity from 3000 to 20000 m3
• Refrigeration units
• Insulation
• No secondary barrier is required
• Used to carry a wide variety of gases ( LPG Vinyl Chloride, Propylene and butadiene )
20
T/P conditions – Semi Pressurized
21
T/P conditions – Ethylene Ships
� Ethylene Ships
• Semi pressurized type vessel
• Type ‘C’ tanks
• Temperature: - 104°C
• No secondary barrier is required
• Thermal insulation
• High capacity reliquefaction
• Capacity range: 1000 to 12000 m3
22
T/P conditions – Ethylene Ships
23
� Fully refrigerated ships
• Cargo carries at approx.atmospheric pressure
• Type ‘A’ tank
• Maximum working pressure: 0,7 barg
• Temperature: - 50°C
• Capacity range: 20000 to 100000 m3
• Provided with longitudinal bulkhead
• Thermal insulation
• Reliquefaction equipment
• Secondary barrier is required
T/P conditions – Fully Refrigerated
24
T/P conditions – Fully Refrigerated
25
� LNG carriers
• Fully refrigerated type
• Maximum working pressure: 0,25 Barg
• Temperature minimum - 165 degr C
• No cooling units
• Dual firing
• Heavy insulation
T/P conditions – LNG carriers
26
Criteria for classification
� Gas carriers can be classified according to different criteria
• Ship survival capability and cargo tank location
– IMO Code
• Pressure / temperature conditions
– Types of gas carriers
» Fully press – Semi Press – Fully ref - …..
• Cargo containment system
– Types of tanks
» Spherical – Rectangular
» Integral – independent - membrane - ……
27
28
cargo containment system
� Types of tanks (IMO)
• by construction - integral
- independent
- semi membrane
- membrane
• by shape - cylindrical/spheric
- rectangular
29
� Integral tanks
• design pressure max 1.25 Bar
• if strenghtened max 1.7 Bar
• A structural part of the ship’s hull
• simple design
• temperature not below -10 degr. C
• applied for Butane
cargo containment system – by construction
30
� Independent, self-suppporting tanks• type A
– recognized standards/classical construction
– Max design pressure 0.7 barg
– secondary barrier
– Cargo: fully ref and near atm.press ( below 0,25 barg )
• type B– Partial secondary barrier in the form of a dip tray
– When prismatic: limited to 0,7 barg
– Hold space: dry air or inert gas
– Almost exclusively applied to LNG ships
– Can be spherical or prismatic
• type C– cylindrical/spherical
– Always used for semi or fully press.vessels
– No secondary barrier is required
– In case of fully press – Max design pressure 18 barg
– In case of semi press – working pressure 5 to 7 barg
cargo containment system – by construction
31
Type ‘A’ tank
32
Type ‘B’ tank
33
Type ‘C’ tank
34
Type ‘C’ tank
35
Cargo containment system – by construction
� Semi-membrane tanks
• A Variation of the tank membrane system
• differences
– Primary barrier is much thicker
– Tank is self supporting when empty
– Not used for LNG
36
� Membrane tanks
• Three principle types:
– Gaz Transport: NO96
– Technigaz: Mark III
– GTT: Combined System 1 (CS1)
cargo containment system – by construction
37
LNG carriers
� Basic features of LNG vessels
• All LNG hulls requires specially designed insulation
– Minimise heat transfer and boil off
– Protect hull steel from low temp embrittlement
• LNG is kept in a sort of metallic container
– To contain the LNG cargo
– To protect the insulation
• Cargo carried at –162 degr C
• A LNG tanker has no compressors on board like LPG
• Dual firing
• Capacity between 130000 – 150000 m3 ( new ships are edging up to 266000 m3 )
38
LNG carriers
� Type of LNG carriers• Self supporting Spherical Type ‘B’
» ( Kvaerner Moss system )
• LNG ship: Technigaz system» ( Single Membrane )
• LNG ship: Gaz transport system» ( Dual Membrane )
• LNG ship: Gaz transport & Technigaz system» (Combined system 1 )
• Self-supporting Prismatic Type ‘B’» ( only a few were built )
� Gas transport and Technigas have now merged to form GTT and are developing new membrane designs. In 2001 GTT launched the new on board LNG containment system : CS1 ( Combined System 1 )
39
Cargo containment system – by shape
� Kvaerner Moss Design
• Consists of an Independent Spherical Tank
• Type ‘B’
– Most common: Spherical tank
– Requires only a partial sec.barrier ( dip tray )
– Hold space: dry inert gas or dry air
– Tank can be spherical or prismatic
40
LNG carrier
41
Spherical type ‘B’ tank
42
Kvaerner Moss Design
43
SPHERICAL TYPE ‘B’ TANK
44
MEMBRANE SHIP
� Technigaz: Mark III
� Gaztransport: N°96
� GTT: CS1
45
Cargo containment system – by construction
� Technigaz system
• Primary barrier: 1.2 mm thick stainless steel
• Raised corrugations or waffles (expansion/contraction)
• Insulation consists of reinforced cellular foam
• Secondary barrier: fibreglass cloth/aluminiumlaminate within the foam
46
Technigaz membrane system
47
Technigaz membrane system
48
MEMBRANE SHIP
� Technigaz: Mark III
� Gaztransport: N°96
� GTT: CS1
49
Cargo containment system – by construction
� Gaz Transport system
• Based on a very thin invar barrier - 0.7 to 1.5 mm
• Membrane is supported through insulation
• Inner hull forms the load bearing structure
• Not self-supporting
• System is provided with sec barrier
• Barriers consists of perlite filled plywood boxes
50
Gaz transport
51
Gaz Transport
52
MEMBRANE SHIP
� Techinigaz: Mark III
� Gaztransport: N°96
� GTT: CS1
53
Cargo containment system – by construction
� Containment combined system
• Combination of the two other existing techniques
• Reinforced polyurethane foam insulation is used
• Prim membrane is made of invar
• Sec membrane is made of composite aluminium-glass fiber called triplex
Calculations shows savings of some 15% on the containment system or about 3% on the total costof the vessel
54
Containment combined system
55
Containment system – existing LNG fleet
56
Containment system – new buildings
57
MOSS VS MEMBRANE
� The membrane technology offers the most cost-effective containment system
• Membrane systems achieves a higher and more efficient deadweight to lightweight ratio for any given hull form
• Membrane systems requires lower effective power and less fuel consumption ( lower operating costs )
• Membrane vessels have less registered tonnage, which reduces port charges and canal dues
• Membrane vessels costs less to dry-dock than a sphere vessel
� Conclusion
• Membrane system require less steel, smaller scale equipments, lower investment from the shipbuilder,
58
LNGX CARRIER
59
LNG carrier
� Kvaerner Masa-Yards has developed a new generation of Moss-type LNG carrier
� Improvements
• Increased cargo capacity
• No boil off due to new compact size reliquefactionplant
• Reduced fuel costs through diesel electric machinery
• Fully azimuthing electric propulsion: excellent manoeuvrability
• Reduced need for harbour tug
2. Properties of LNG
From NG to LNG
• Natural gas
• LNG production
62
Natural gas: origin
� Origin of natural gas?
• Plankton and micro-organisms died and sankto the bottom
• Thick layers of organic material
• Organic material covered with sediment layers
• Temperature increase due to processes goingon in the earth
Pressure increase due to mud layers
⇒⇒⇒⇒ FORMATION OF NATURAL GAS
63
Natural gas: sources
� Natural gas may be found in:
• Underground wells, which are mainly gas bearing
– Non-associated gas
• Condensate reservoirs
– Pentanes and heavier Hydrocarbons
• Large oil fields
– Associated gas
– Natural gas may be either in solution with the crude oil or as a gas-cap above it
64
Natural gas: composition
� Most important component?
⇒ methane : 1 carbon atom + 4 hydrogen atoms
http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761568077/Methane.html
65
Natural gas: composition
� Hydrocarbons?
• Family of organic compounds
• Composed entirely of Carbon and Hydrogen:
CnH2n+2 with n = amount of carbon atoms
DecaneCH3-(CH2)8-CH3C10H22
NonaneCH3-(CH2)7-CH3C9H20
OctaneCH3-(CH2)6-CH3C8H18
HeptaneCH3-(CH2)5-CH3C7H16
HexaneCH3-(CH2)4-CH3C6H14
PentaneCH3-(CH2)3-CH3C5H12
ButaneCH3-(CH2)2-CH3C4H10
PropaneCH3-CH2-CH3C3H8
EthaneCH3-CH3C2H6
MethaneCH4CH4
66
Natural gas: composition
� Composition of natural gas?
• may vary widely
• Typical composition
traceAr, He, Ne, XeRare gases
0-5%H2SHydrogen Sulphide
0-5%N2Nitrogen
0-0.2%O2Oxygen
0-8%CO2Carbon Dioxide
C4H10Butane
0-20%C3H8Propane
C2H6Ethane
70-97%CH4Methane
http://www.naturalgas.org/overview/background.asp
67
Natural gas: composition
� Natural gas• Contains smaller quantities of heavier hydrocarbons
– Known as natural gas liquids – NGL
• Contains amounts of water, Carbon dioxide, nitrogen and other non-hydrocarbon Substances
� NGL• made up of ethane, propane, butane, pentane, hexane
and heavier fractions
• Proportion varies from one location to another
• Percentage smaller in gas wells
� LNG• Mainly methane and ethane, liquefied at cryogenic
temperature
� Condensate• A liquid/hydrocarbon mixture , which may be recovered
at the surface from some non-associated gas reservoirs
68
Natural gas: composition
� Constituents of natural gas
From NG to LNG
• Natural gas
• LNG production
70
LNG production: overview
Raw feed gas
Condensate removal
Acid gas removal
Dehydration
Fractionation
Liquefaction
LNG storage
NGL storage
Pentane-plus storage
Fuel to plant
to jetties
CO2
H2S
water
-162°C
McGuire and White, Liquefied gas handling principles,2000
71
LNG production
� Raw feed gas
� Condensate removal
� Acid gas removal
• CO2
freezing point CO2 > atmospheric boiling point LNG
⇒ Cargo contamination
⇒ operational difficulties (clogging of pumps, filters and valves)
• H2S
causes atmospheric pollution when being burnt in a fuel
72
LNG production
� Dehydration (water removal)
• to avoid the formation of ice
freezing point water > atmospheric boiling point LNG
⇒ cargo contamination
⇒ operational difficulties (clogging of pumps, filters and valves)
• to avoid hydrate formation
hydrocarbons + water → hydrates
hydrates are crystalline substances
⇒ operational difficulties
� NGL fractionation
• NG: Natural gas
• GTL: Gas To Liquids
• CNG: Compressed Natural Gas
� Liquefaction and storage
73
LNG properties
74
LNG: Properties
• Temp: ± -160°C/-260 °F
• Volume liquid = 1/600 volume gas @ STP
• Density = ± 450 kg/m³ (~ composition/temperature)
• Colorless
• Odorless
• Non-toxic
• Non corrosive
• Safety/ hazard � later
• Composition
• ~ source
• changes during transport
75
Composition changes during transport
� Influence on the
• Molecular mass LNG
• GHVmass
• GHVvolume
• Density
� Effect high Nitrogen content
76
LNG composition change: Example
0.0122Nitrogen
0.0002n-Pentane
0.0017Iso Pentane
0.0554n-Butane
0.0735Iso Butane
0.3648Propane
2.4270Ethane
97.0651Methane
Load portComponent
�Composition load port: � discharge port
0.0056
0.0003
0.0036
0.1267
0.1590
0.6465
3.2654
95.7928
DifferenceDischarge Port
77
Change during transport
� Properties of the main Components
0,0
4756,0
4008,7
4000,9
3262,4
3252,0
2516,2
1769,7
1010,0
Hvi(BTU/SCF)
0
20944
21085
21044
21300
21232
21654
22334
23892
Hmi(BTU/LB)
28,013
86,175
72,149
72,149
58,122
58,122
44,096
30,069
16,042
Mi (g/mol)
-195,9Nitrogen
69Hexane
36N-Pentane
28Iso Pentane
-0,5N-Butane
-11,7Iso Butane
-42,1Propane
-88,6Ethane
-162Methane
Boiling Point (°C)
Component
78
Change during transport: cause
� Components with lowest boiling points will evaporate first
-195,9Nitrogen
69Hexane
36N-Pentane
28Iso Pentane
-0,5N-Butane
-11,7Iso Butane
-42,1Propane
-88,6Ethane
-162Methane
Boiling Point (°C)
Component
Temp LNG = -160 °C
Product becomes richer
79
Change during transport: Mavg
� Components with lowest BP have lowest Mi
28,013-195,9Nitrogen
86,17569Hexane
72,14936N-Pentane
72,14928Iso Pentane
58,122-0,5N-Butane
58,122-11,7Iso Butane
44,096-42,1Propane
30,069-88,6Ethane
16,042-162Methane
Mi (g/mol)
Boiling Point (°C)
Component
80
Change during transport: Mavg
16.8016.54Mavg [kg/kmol]
0.00560.0122Nitrogen
0.0000
0.0039
0.1267
0.1590
0.6465
3.2654
95.7928
Discharge port
0.0002
0.0017
0.0554
0.0735
0.3648
2.4270
97.0651
Load port
n-Pentane
Iso Pentane
n-Butane
Iso Butane
Propane
Ethane
Methane
Component
81
Change during transport: density
� Density ~ composition and temperature
� Calculation density @ fixed temperature= -160 °C
� Calculation Klosek-Mckinley
82
Change during transport: density @ -160 °C
430.59Density [kg/m³]
0.0122Nitrogen
0.0002n-Pentane
0.0017Iso Pentane
0.0554n-Butane
0.0735Iso Butane
0.3648Propane
2.4270Ethane
97.0651Methane
Load PortComponent
435.49
0.0056
0.0000
0.0039
0.1267
0.1590
0.6465
3.2654
95.7928
Discharge Port
83
Change during transport: GHVmass
� Hydrocarbons with lowest BP have highest Hmi
� Calculation GHV mass: ISO 6976 @ 15°C
0
20944
21085
21044
21300
21232
21654
22334
23892
Hmi (BTU/LB)
-195,9Nitrogen
69Hexane
36N-Pentane
28Iso Pentane
-0,5N-Butane
-11,7Iso Butane
-42,1Propane
-88,6Ethane
-162Methane
Boiling Point (°C)Component
84
Change during transport: GHVmass
55.3267GHVmass [MJ/kg]
0.0122Nitrogen
0.0002n-Pentane
0.0017Iso Pentane
0.0554n-Butane
0.0735Iso Butane
0.3648Propane
2.4270Ethane
97.0651Methane
Load PortComponent
55.2029
0.0056
0.0000
0.0039
0.1267
0.1590
0.6465
3.2654
95.7928
Discharge Port
85
Change during transport: GHVvolume
� Hydrocarbons with lowest BP have lowest Hvi
� Calculation GHVvolume: ISO 6976 @ 15°C (ideal gas)
0,0
4756,0
4008,7
4000,9
3262,4
3252,0
2516,2
1769,7
1010,0
Hvi (BTU/SCF)
-195,9Nitrogen
69Hexane
36N-Pentane
28Iso Pentane
-0,5N-Butane
-11,7Iso Butane
-42,1Propane
-88,6Ethane
-162Methane
Boiling Point (°C)Component
86
Change during transport: GHVvolume
38.703GHVvol [MJ/m³]
0.0122Nitrogen
0.0002n-Pentane
0.0017Iso Pentane
0.0554n-Butane
0.0735Iso Butane
0.3648Propane
2.4270Ethane
97.0651Methane
Load PortComponent
39.242
0.0056
0.0000
0.0039
0.1267
0.1590
0.6465
3.2654
95.7928
Discharge Port
87
Change during transport: High Nitrogen content
� Cargo with high N2 content!!
• Methane may increase due to a high decrease in Nitrogen
• In this case the molar GHV (mass based) may also increase
=> Behaviour of GHV (mass based) during transport depends highly on the composition of the cargo!!
88
Change during transport: High Nitrogen content
41,552Hv (ISO 6976 - 0°C) [MJ/m³]
54,4845Hm (ISO 6976 - 0°C) [MJ/kg]
442,2649Density @ -160°C [kg/m³]
0,8100Nitrogen
0,0000N-Hexane
0,0000N-Pentane
0,0000Iso Pentane
0,0200N-Butane
0,0200Iso-Butane
0,3500Propane
5,9800Ethane
92,8200Methane
Load Port
41,789
54,8025
441,9915
0,4400
0,0000
0,0000
0,0000
0,0200
0,0200
0,3800
6,2200
92,9200
Discharge Port
89
Change during transport: overview
� Components with lowest BP evaporate first
• Percentage nitrogen and methane will decrease
• All other percentages (heaviest components) will increase
� Consequences
• Molecular weight of mix will increase
• Density will increase
• Molar GHV on volume basis will increase
• Molar GHV on mass basis will decrease
� Remark: High nitrogen content
• Density may decrease
• Molar GHV on mass basis may decrease
• Molar GHV on volume basis will increase
90
Change during transport: Quantity
� Change in Quality
� Change in Quantity• Gas used as a fuel: dual - firing
• Determined by experience– Weather ?
– Direction waves ? ( motion of the ship ? )
– Cargo handling ? (Gas – Gas, Fuel – Fuel, TK pressure …)
– Length voyage ? ( at anchor, drifting )
– Composition ?
– Volume Vessel
– Age Vessel
– Insulation
– Etc
• Has to comply with the limit described in Charter Party– Exception Gas – Gas
91
Change during transport
� Prediction based on experience
3. Custody Transfer Instruments
93
Role of CTS
Custody Transfer System
94
Components for CTS
� Temperature gauging system
• Temperature sensors
• Temperature indication system
� Pressure gauging system
• Combined test for pressure sensor and indication system
� Trim List inclinometer
• Trim List sensor
• Trim List interface
� Level Measurement system
95
Level Measurement system
� Types
• Float gauge
• Capacitance gauge
• Radar system
� Two types are installed
• Primary system
• Secondary system
96
Level Measurement system
� Float gauge• Serving as a secondary gauge
• Float hanging on a ribbon
• Recording rotation of cycles on drum
• Local and remote readout
• Accuracy in range of ± 4 mm to ± 8 mm
• Corrections to be applied
– Trim
– List
– Density of LNG, Affects float buoyancy
– Correction for thermal contraction/expansion of wire
• Commercial manufactures
– Whessoe
– Enraf
97
FLOAT GAUGE
98
FLOAT GAUGE
99
Level Measurement system
� Capacitance gauge• Consists of two concentric aluminium tubes
• LNG will fill the space between the tubes
• Level to be determined by measuring the change in capacitance
• Accuracy ± 7.5 mm
• Corrections to be applied
– Trim
– List
100
CAPACITANCE GAUGE
101
CAPACITANCE GAUGE
1. Outer aluminium tube
2. Inner aluminium tube
3. Concentric electrical insulator
4. Isolation of inner tube sections by a gap
or dielectic plug
5. Isolation from the tank bottom
6. Bolting together the sections of the outer
tube making a single electrical conductor
7. Transfer line of the signals from the
outer tube and each centre of the inner
tube to a control junction box outside the
cargo tank
8. LNG cargo tank
102
Level Measurement system
� Microwave gauge• The same principle as a ship’s radar
• Transmitter mounted on top cargo tank
• Emits radar waves to surface of liquid
• Signal reflects
• Signal received by transmitter’s antenna
• Sent back to the control panel and processed
• Accuracy better than ± 7.5 mm
• Corrections to be applied
– Trim
– List
103
RADAR GAUGE
104
RADAR GAUGE
Limitation of CT Instruments
106
Limitation of CT Instruments
� During Cooling Down
• Cooling down creating a kind of fog
• Limits cooling down should be respected
� Measuring Heel
• Level indicating liquid, however it’s out of the measurable range
4. Principles of LNG sampling
108
Traditional sampling
� Traditional Liquid Gas sampling
• Sample points/pipes
• Liquid filling of container
• Vapor sampling
109
LNG sampling
� Spot sampling
Vapor Liquid
Sprayline
?
110
Traditional sampling
� Traditional Sampling points are of No use
� Sampling creates boiling effect
� Boiling creates fractionation
Top 1Middle 2 Bottom 3Sump 4
1
2
34
111
Problem
� Fractionation effect
� Boiling Points
• N2 = -196 C
• C1 = -162 C
• C2 = - 88 C
• C3 = - 42 C
• C4 = - 5 C
• C5 = 36 C…………..
112
Problem
� Gas volume/liquid volume effect
• N2 = 205
• C1 = 619
• C2 = 619
• C3 = 413
• C4 = 311
• C5 = 311
113
Traditional sampling
� Traditional Liquid Gas sampling
• NOT POSSIBLE FOR LNG
• Fractionation effect
• Gas volume/liquid volume effect
114
Solution
� Sampling LNG
• VAPOR?
• LIQUID?
• VAPORIZED LIQUID?
115
Solution
� Sampling LNG ?
• VAPOR SAMPLE = Possible, but useless
• LIQUID SAMPLE = Not possible
Due to LNG critical P/T values
• VAPORIZED LIQUID = Yes, only alternative
116
LNG sampling
� Sampling features
• Sampling variables/Controled conditions
• Sample location/frequency
• Sampling point– Shape
– Flow rate
– Location
• insulation sampling line
• Sample Vaporizer– Outlet Temp
– Inlet Temp
5. Energy Calculation(Klosek McKinley density routine)
118
Transferred energy
• Etransferred = energy transferred from loading facilities to LNG carrier of
from LNG carrier to unloading facilities
• DLNG = Density of LNG loaded or unloaded (kg/m³)
• VLNG = Volume of LNG loaded or unloaded (m³)
• GHV = Gross Heating Value of LNG loaded or unloaded (MJ/kg or
MMBTU/kg): quantity of heat produced by complete combustion in air of a unit of
volume or mass of the gas, at a constant absolute pressure of 1,01325 bar and at a
temperature T
• Egas displaced = quantity of energy in gaseous form displaced during loading
or unloading (MMBTU)
displacedgasLNGLNGLNGdtransferre EGHVVDE ** −=
119
KMK Density
� Klosek McKinley density
• Easy to apply
• Requires only the LNG temperature and composition to betaken into account
• Application limits:
– min 60% CH4
– max 4% C4
– Max 4% N2
– Temp. < 115 K
120
KMK Density
� Klosek Mc Kinley density calculation routine - revised
• Mixture molar mass determined by composition and dependent of temperature
• Mixture True Molar volume = mixture pseudo molar volume –volume reduction
volumetruemixture
massmolarmixtureDensity
=
121
Mixture true volume
� Mixture true volume?
V1 = 100 liter of ping-pong balls
V2 = 100 liter of footballs
volume of the mixture?
volumetruemixture
massmolarmixturedensity
=
122
Mixture true volume
+
V1 = 100 L V2 = 100 L
Vtot = ??? L ??
123
Mixture true volume
124
Mixture true volume
125
KMK Density
� The determination of the Mixture Molar Mass (ISO 6976-95)
Molar Molecular Molar
Fraction Mass Mass
Components (Xi)-g/mol (Mi)-g/mol (Xi * Mi)-g/mol
Methane 0,89235 16,0430 14,315971
Ethane 0,08267 30,0700 2.485887
Propane 0,01313 44,0970 0,578994
Iso Butane 0,00167 58,1230 0,097065
N-Butane 0,00277 58,1230 0,161001
Iso Pentane 0,00011 72,1500 0,007937
N-Pentane 0,00000 72,1500 0,00000
N-Hexane 0,00000 86,1770 0,00000
Nitrogen 0,00730 28,0130 0,204499
Oxygen 0,00000 31,9990 0,00000
Carbon Dioxide 0,00000 44,0100 0,00000
1,00000 17.851353 = mixture molar mass
126
KMK Density
� The determination of the Mixture Pseudo Molar Volume
Molar Molecular Vol. Molar Vol.
Fraction m3 / kmole m3 / kmole
Components (Xi) (Vi) (Xi * Vi)
Methane 0,892350 0,038046 0,033950
Ethane 0,082670 0,047877 0,003958
Propane 0,013130 0,062427 0,000820
Iso Butane 0,001670 0,078274 0,000131
N-Butane 0,002770 0,076801 0,000213
Iso Pentane 0,000110 0,091637 0,000010
Nitrogen 0,007300 0,046491 0,000339
1,000000 0,039421 = mixture pseudo molar volume
127
KMK Density
� Determination of the Mixture True Molar Volume
True mixture Molar volume = Σ ( Xi * Vi ) - Xm * C
Xm * C = volume reduction factor
With C = K1 + ((K2 – K1) * Xn/0,0425)
K1 and K2 correction factors depending on the mixture
molecular weight and the LNG liquid temperature
Xn molar fraction of nitrogen
Xm molar fraction of methane
128
KMK Density
� Determination of the Mixture True Molar Volume
True mixture Molar volume = Σ Σ Σ Σ ( Xi * Vi ) - Xm * C
C = K1 + ((K2 – K1) * (Xn/0,0425))
K1 and K2 at 112.38 and with MM 17.851353 g/mol
K1 = 0.000376 l/mol
K2 = 0.000609 l/mol
C = 0.000376 + ((0.000609 - 0.000376) x (0.0073/0.0425)
C = 0.000416
Xm*C = 0.89235 x 0.000416 = 0.000371
True Molar Volume = 0.03941 – 0.000371 = 0.039050 l/mol
129
KMK Density
� Klosek – McKinley density calculation routine -revised
Density = mixture molar mass
mixture true molar volume
Density = 17.851353 = 457.140922 kg/m³
0.039050
5. Quantity calculation routine (Energy)
131
Transferred energy
• Etransferred = energy transferred from loading facilities to LNG carrier of
from LNG carrier to unloading facilities
• DLNG = Density of LNG loaded or unloaded (kg/m³)
• VLNG = Volume of LNG loaded or unloaded (m³)
• GHV = Gross Heating Value of LNG loaded or unloaded (MJ/kg or
MMBTU/kg): quantity of heat produced by complete combustion in air of a unit of
volume or mass of the gas, at a constant absolute pressure of 1,01325 bar and at a
temperature T
• Egas displaced = quantity of energy in gaseous form displaced during loading
or unloading (MMBTU)
displacedgasLNGLNGLNGdtransferre EGHVVDE ** −=
132
Quantity calculation
� Liquid Quantity?
Expressed in Energy terms:
Liquid mass x GCV liquid (mass)
GCV: Gross Calorific Value
units? Kg x MJ/kg = MJ
MJ →→→→ BTU →→→→ MMBTU
133
Heating values
� Heating values?
• Vapour
• Liquid
134
Heating values
� Heating values?
• GHV (Gross heating value)
• HHV (Higher heating value)
• GCV (Gross calorific value)
135
Measurements
� Temperature of LNG liquid and vapour phase
� Level
• Corrections on level measurement
– Trim
– List
– Temperature
• Determine volume from gauge tables
� Pressure
136
Quality and quantity
� Volume before/after loading
� Laboratory analysis
• Density of LNG
• GCV of gas displaced
• GCV of LNG
E = (VLNG * DLNG * GCVLNG) – Egas displaced
137
Composition calculation
� Xi molar fraction: ratio of the number of moles of the component to the total number of moles in a mixture
• Gas chromatograph
� Mi (kg/kmol) molecular weight• norm
� Xi*Mi (kg/kmol) molar mass
� Vi (m³/kmol) molecular volume• norm
• Interpolation for T
� Vi*Xi (m³/kmol) molar volume
� Hmi (MJ/kg) molecular GHV: quantity of heat produced bycomplete combusion in air of a unit of volume or mass of the gas, at a constant absolute pressure of 1.01325 bar and at a temperature T
• Norm
� Xi*Hmi*Mi (MJ/kg) molar GHV
138
Tables Vi (norm: NBSI report 77-867)
0,027950 0,027650 0,027300 0,027200 0,027000 0,026700 0,026400 Carbon Dioxide
0,033670 0,032750 0,031910 0,031510 0,031150 0,030450 0,029800 Oxygen
0,055877 0,051921 0,048488 0,046995 0,045702 0,043543 0,041779 Nitrogen
0,106020 0,105570 0,105122 0,104899 0,104677 0,104236 0,103800 N-Hexane
0,092643 0,092217 0,091794 0,091583 0,091373 0,090953 0,090535 N-Pentane
0,092817 0,092377 0,091939 0,091721 0,091504 0,091071 0,090641 Iso Pentane
0,077847 0,077456 0,077068 0,076876 0,076684 0,076303 0,075926 N-Butane
0,079374 0,078962 0,078554 0,078352 0,078151 0,077751 0,077356 Iso Butane
0,063417 0,063045 0,062678 0,062497 0,062316 0,061957 0,061602 Propane
0,048805 0,048455 0,048111 0,047942 0,047774 0,047442 0,047116 Ethane
0,039579 0,038983 0,038419 0,038148 0,037884 0,037375 0,036890 Methane
-150-154-158-160-162-166-170Temperature
139
Determination Vi at Tliq = -162.39°C
0.0269710.0270000.027600Carbon dioxide
0.0310820.0311500.030450Oxygen
0.0454910.0457020.043543Nitrogen
0.1046340.1046770.104236N-Hexane
0.0913320.0913730.090953N-Pentane
0.0914620.0915040.091071Iso-Pentane
0.0766470.0766840.076303N-Butane
0.0781120.0781510.077751Iso Butane
0.0622810.0623160.061957Propane
0.0477420.0477740.047442Ethane
0.0378340.0378840.037375Methane
Vi at -162.39°CVi at -162°CVi at -166°CComponent
)(*))/()(( 112121 TTTTVVVV TTTT −−−+=
037834.0))166(39.162(*))166(162(
)037375.0037884.0(037375.0 =−−−
−−−
−+
140
Composition calculation
976.96670.03952218.2101.0000TOTALS:
0.00000.0000.0000000.0269710.00044.0100.0000Carbon Dioxide
0.00000.0000.0000000.0310820.00031.9990.0000Oxygen
0.00000.0000.0005640.0454910.33628.0130.0120Nitrogen
0.000048.7190.0000000.1046340.00086.1780.0000N-Hexane
0.000049.0530.0000000.0913320.00072.1510.0000N-Pentane
0.000048.9440.0000000.0914620.00072.1510.0000Iso-Pentane
12.094749.5440.0003220.0766470.24458.1240.0042N-Butane
8.901549.4020.0002420.0781120.18058.1240.0031Iso Butane
45.776950.3930.0012830.0622810.90844.0970.0206Propane
126.786951.9260.0038770.0477422.44230.0700.0812Ethane
783.406755.5600.0332520.03783414.10016.0430.8789Methane
Xi*Mi*Hmi
MJ/kg
Hmi
MJ/kg
Vi*Xi
m³/kmol
Vi
m³/kmol
Xi*Mi kg/kmol
Mi kg/kmol
Xicomponents
GC norm Multiply 2 previous columnsNorm + interpolationMultiply 1st and 4th columnnormMultiply 1st, 2nd, 6th column
141
Density calculation
� Revised Klosek McKinley density calculation
0.0425
Density = Σ ( Xi * Mi )
Σ ( Xi * Vi ) – [(k1 + (k2 – k1)*Xn) * Xm]
• k1 and k2 correction factors depending on molar mass and the T of
the LNG
• Xm molar fraction of methane
• Xn molar fraction of nitrogen
Application limits:
• min 60 % CH4
• max 4 % C4
• max 4 % N2
• T < 115 K
142
Tables k1 (norm: NBSI Report 77-867)
0,002238 0,002043 0,001867 0,001790 0,001714 0,001567 0,001435 30,00,001782 0,001619 0,001475 0,001407 0,001339 0,001220 0,001116 25,00,000976 0,000881 0,000793 0,000757 0,000721 0,000654 0,000590 20,00,000932 0,000842 0,000757 0,000722 0,000688 0,000622 0,000561 19,80,000888 0,000803 0,000721 0,000688 0,000655 0,000590 0,000532 19,60,000844 0,000763 0,000685 0,000653 0,000622 0,000558 0,000503 19,40,000800 0,000724 0,000649 0,000619 0,000589 0,000526 0,000474 19,20,000757 0,000685 0,000613 0,000584 0,000556 0,000494 0,000445 19,00,000717 0,000645 0,000575 0,000548 0,000523 0,000467 0,000421 18,80,000677 0,000605 0,000537 0,000513 0,000489 0,000440 0,000397 18,60,000637 0,000566 0,000499 0,000477 0,000456 0,000412 0,000373 18,40,000597 0,000526 0,000460 0,000441 0,000423 0,000385 0,000349 18,20,000557 0,000486 0,000422 0,000405 0,000389 0,000357 0,000325 18,00,000502 0,000438 0,000382 0,000366 0,000351 0,000321 0,000293 17,80,000447 0,000390 0,000342 0,000327 0,000312 0,000286 0,000260 17,60,000392 0,000342 0,000301 0,000287 0,000274 0,000250 0,000228 17,40,000337 0,000293 0,000261 0,000248 0,000235 0,000214 0,000195 17,20,000282 0,000245 0,000221 0,000209 0,000197 0,000179 0,000163 17,00,000135 0,000118 0,000106 0,000100 0,000094 0,000086 0,000078 16,5
-0,000012 -0,000010 -0,000009 -0,000009 -0,000008 -0,000007 -0,000007 16,0
-150-154-158-160-162-166-170
143
Determination of k1 at Tliq = -162.39°C
0.0004560.00041218.4 g/mol
0.0004230.00038518.2 g/mol
-162°C-166°CTliq
Σ(Xi*Mi)
)(*))/()(( 112121 TTTTkkkk TTTT −−−+=
000419.0))166(39.162(*))166(162(
)000385.0000423.0(000385.0 =
−−−
−−−
−+
Interpolation for temperature for both molar masses:
000452.0))166(39.162(*))166(162(
)000412.0000456.0(000412.0 =
−−−
−−−
−+
Σ(Xi*Mi) = 18.2 g/mol
Σ(Xi*Mi) = 18.4 g/mol
144
Determination of k1 at Tliq = -162.39°C and Σ(Xi*Mi) = 18.210 g/mol
Interpolation for molar mass (MM) at Tliq = -162.39°C
0.000456
0.000423
-162°C
0.000452
0.000419
-162.39°C
0.00041218.4 g/mol
0.00038518.2 g/mol
-166°CTliq
Σ(Xi*Mi)
)(*))/()((112121 ∑∑∑∑ −−
∑−
∑+
∑=
∑MMMMMMMMkkkk
MMMMMMMM
000421.0)2.18210.18(*)2.184.18(
)000419.0000452.0(000419.01 =
−
−
−+=k
145
Tables k2 (norm: NBSI Report 77-867)
0,003723 0,003230 0,002806 0,002631 0,002459 0,002172 0,001934 30,00,002734 0,002374 0,002014 0,001893 0,001777 0,001562 0,001383 25,00,001619 0,001382 0,001158 0,001065 0,000973 0,000823 0,000709 20,00,001573 0,001342 0,001118 0,001029 0,000941 0,000794 0,000681 19,80,001526 0,001302 0,001078 0,000992 0,000908 0,000765 0,000652 19,60,001480 0,001262 0,001038 0,000956 0,000876 0,000737 0,000623 19,40,001434 0,001222 0,000998 0,000920 0,000844 0,000708 0,000594 19,20,001388 0,001182 0,000958 0,000883 0,000811 0,000679 0,000566 19,00,001320 0,001121 0,000912 0,000841 0,000773 0,000642 0,000531 18,80,001252 0,001061 0,000865 0,000799 0,000735 0,000605 0,000496 18,60,001184 0,001000 0,000819 0,000756 0,000696 0,000567 0,000460 18,40,001116 0,000939 0,000772 0,000714 0,000658 0,000530 0,000425 18,20,001049 0,000878 0,000726 0,000672 0,000620 0,000493 0,000390 18,00,000973 0,000816 0,000664 0,000613 0,000564 0,000449 0,000354 17,80,000897 0,000754 0,000602 0,000554 0,000508 0,000406 0,000318 17,60,000821 0,000692 0,000540 0,000495 0,000452 0,000362 0,000282 17,40,000745 0,000630 0,000478 0,000436 0,000397 0,000318 0,000246 17,20,000669 0,000568 0,000416 0,000377 0,000341 0,000274 0,000210 17,00,000315 0,000269 0,000196 0,000178 0,000162 0,000131 0,000101 16,5-0,000039 -0,000031 -0,000024 -0,000021 -0,000017 -0,000012 -0,000009 16,0
-150-154-158-160-162-166-170
146
0.0006960.00056718.4 g/mol
0.0006580.00053018.2 g/mol
-162°C-166°CTliq
Σ(Xi*Mi)
Determination of k2 at Tliq = -162.39°C and Σ(Xi*Mi) = 18.210 g/mol
Interpolation for temperature and Σ(Xi*Mi)
Same as for k1
k2 = 0.00674
147
Density calculation
0.0425
Density = Σ ( Xi * Mi )
Σ ( Xi * Vi ) – [(k1 + (k2 – k1)*Xn) * Xm]
Σ (Xi * Mi) = 18.210
Σ (Xi * Vi) = 0.039522
k1 = 0.000421
k2 = 0.000647
Xn = 0.0120
Xm = 0.8789
⇒ Density = 465.78 kg/m³
constant
148
Higher heating values
∑∑
=)*(
)**(
MiXi
MiHmiXiHm
kgMJHm /53.6500210.18
9667.976==
149
Consumed energy
� Energy of gas consumed
• E gas consumed =
V gas.metered x GCV gas
(GCV gas => MMBTU/m3) – (ISO 6976)
150
BTU quantity delivered
MMBTUVDH
Q LNGmtotal 904749
12.1055
400.38201*78.465*6500.53
12.1055
**===
MMBTUP
TVQ
vap
LNGr 366312.1055
7.37*
25.1013*
15.273
15.288* =
+=
MMBTUQQQ rtotalnet 9010863663904749 =−=−=
Conversion factor MJ → MMBTU
GCV of 100% CH4 at 1013.25mbar and 15°CStandard temperature
Standard pressure
5. Quantity calculation routine :- Wobbe index
152
Wobbe index
� Interchangeable?
substitute gas yields same results in the combustion process as the original gas
� Determining interchangeability?
Wobbe index: measure of the energy flow through a nozzle
Qv = flow rate
P = static pressure
DP = differential pressure
SG = specific gravity
T = temperature
C = constant based on geometry
5,0)*/*(* TSGDPPCQv =
153
Wobbe index
� Energy flow would be:
HV = Heating Value
� For constant pressure and T:
⇒ for the same pressure at the burner, gases of equal Wobbe Index will generate heat at equal rates per unit of burner port area.
5,0)*/*(*** TSGDPPCHVHVQE v ==
indexWobbeSG
HVE ~
5,0=
154
Wobbe index (norm: ISO 6976:1995)
density gas relative
H index wobbe
gas v=
mix
vi
Z
HXi∑=
)*(H gas v
2))*((1 ∑−= imix bXiZ
Hvi = ideal calorific value on a volumetric basis of component i
Z = compression factor
Root bi = summation factor
mix
airair
ii
rZ
ZMM
X
D∑
=*
*()
155
0,628743,598000,000000,996864Z=100,0000TOTALS:
0,00000,00000,000000,000000,00000,081900,00000,0000Carbon
Dioxide
0,00000,00000,000000,000000,00000,031600,00000,0000Oxygen
0,01160,96720,000000,000000,00030,0224028,01401,1980Nitrogen
0,00002,97540,00000187,300000,00000,3286086,17600,0000N-Hexane
0,00002,49110,00000157,870000,00000,2864072,14980,0000N-Pentane
0,00002,49110,00000157,570000,00000,2510072,14980,0000Iso-Pentane
0,00842,00680,53700128,480000,00090,2069058,12300,4180N- Butane
0,00632,00680,40210128,070000,00060,2049058,12300,3140Iso Butane
0,03131,52252,0373099,090000,00300,1453044,09622,0560Propane
0,08431,03825,6616069,690000,00810,1000030,07008,1240Ethane
0,48680,553934,9600039,777000,04310,0490016,043087,8900Methane
Xi*Mi/MairMi/MairMJ/m³Xi*Hvi
MJ/m³ HviXi*Root(Bi)Root(Bi)MiXi
Components
Mair=28.9626
normGC
(1)*(3) (1)*(5) (1)*(7)(2)/28.9626
156
Wobbe index
3
gas v /74.43996864.0
59800.43)*(H mMJ
Z
HXi
mix
vi===
∑
6303.0996864.0
99941.0*6287.0**(
D)
r ===∑
mix
airair
ii
Z
ZMM
X
³/09.556306.0
74.43
density gas relative
H index wobbe
gas vmMJ===
5. Quantity calculation routine :- Exercise
158
Exercise
• Tliq = -159.5°C
• Tvap = - 112.8
• P = 1195 mbar
• V = 126589 m³
Composition:
0.0000Carbon dioxide
0.0000Oxygen
0.0008Nitrogen
0.0000N-Hexane
0.0000N-Pentane
0.0004Iso-Pentane
0.0032N-Butane
0.0029Iso butane
0.0191Propane
0.0416Ethane
0.9320Methane
Molar fractioncomponent
159
Exercise
� Calculate with previous methods
• Density
• Hm
• Qtotal
• Qr
• Qnet
160
Exercise
1. Density
a) Σ (Xi*Mi)
17.4511.0000TOTALS
0.00044.0100.0000Carbon dioxide
0.00031.9990.0000Oxygen
0.02228.0130.0008Nitrogen
0.00086.1780.0000N-Hexane
0.00072.1510.0000N-Pentane
0.02972.1510.0004Iso-Pentane
0.18658.1240.0032N-Butane
0.16958.1240.0029Iso butane
0.84244.0970.0191Propane
1.25130.0700.0416Ethane
14.95216.0430.9320Methane
Xi*MiMiXicomponent
161
Exercise
0,027300
0,031910
0,048488
0,105122
0,091794
0,091939
0,077068
0,078554
0,062678
0,048111
0,038419
-158
0.027225
0.031610
0.047368
0.104955
0.091636
0.091776
0.076924
0.078403
0.062542
0.047984
0.038216
-159.5
0,027200 Carbon Dioxide
0,031510 Oxygen
0,046995 Nitrogen
0,104899 N-Hexane
0,091583 N-Pentane
0,091721 Iso Pentane
0,076876 N-Butane
0,078352 Iso Butane
0,062497 Propane
0,047942 Ethane
0,038148 Methane
-160Temperature
1. Density
b) Interpolation for Vi and calculation Σ (Xi * Vi)
162
Exercise
0.027225
0.031610
0.047368
0.104955
0.091636
0.091776
0.076924
0.078403
0.062542
0.047984
0.038216
Vi
0.0000
0.0000
0.0008
0.0000
0.0000
0.0004
0.0032
0.0029
0.0191
0.0416
0.9320
Xi
0.039356TOTALS
0.000000Carbon dioxide
0.000000Oxygen
0.000038Nitrogen
0.000000N-Hexane
0.000000N-Pentane
0.000037Iso-Pentane
0.000246N-Butane
0.000227Iso butane
0.001195Propane
0.001996Ethane
0.035617Methane
Xi*Vicomponent
163
Exercise
0,000342
0,000301
-158
0.000331
0.000291
-159.5
0,000327 17,6
0,000287 17,4
-160
1. Density
c) Interpolation for k1 and k2
k1 = 0.000301
0,000602
0,000540
-158
0.000566
0.000506
-159.5
0,000554 17,6
0,000495 17,4
-160
k2 = 0.000521
164
Exercise
1. Density
d) Calculation of density
0.0425
Density = Σ ( Xi * Mi )
Σ ( Xi * Vi ) – [(k1 + (k2 – k1)*Xn) * Xm]
³/64.446
9320.0*0425.0
0008.0*)000301.0000521.0(000301.0039356.0
451.17mkgdensity =
−+−
=
165
Exercise
2. Calculation Hm
957.0905TOTALS
0.00000.000Carbon Dioxide
0.00000.000Oxygen
0.00000.000Nitrogen
0.000048.719N-hexane
0.000049.053N-Pentane
1.412548.944Iso-Pentane
9.215049.544N-Butane
8.327249.402Iso Butane
42.443650.393Propane
64.954951.926Ethane
830.737355.560Methane
Xi*Hmi*MiHmicomponent
166
Exercise
kgMJMiXi
MiHmiXiHm /8445.54
451.17
0905.957
)*(
)**(===
∑∑
167
Exercise
MMBTUVDH
Q LNGmtotal 2939109
12.1055
126598*64.446*8445.54
12.1055
**===
MMBTU
P
TVQ
vap
LNGr
9586
12.1055
7.37*
25.1013
1195*
8.11215.273
15.288
12.1055
7.37*
25.1013*
15.273
15.288* =
−=
+=
3. Calculation Qtotaal, Qr, Qnet
MMBTUQQQ rtotalnet 292952395862939109 =−=−=
6. Lay out and equipment of LNG vessels
169
� Lay-out & equipment LNG
• Cargo piping system
– Liquid Header
– Vapour Header
– Stripping header
– Gas header
– Gas to Engine
– Vent line
– Inerting line
– N2 line ( prim. and sec barrier )
170
LAY OUT
7. Cargo Handling: Preparation
172
� Readiness• Pre – arrival tests
– Test of main fire pump and emergency fire pump
– Test of all fire and spray valves
– Test of gas detector
– Test of Emergency Shut Down
– Closing time manifold valves
– Test of H, HH, VH and EH levels cargo tanks and automatic closing of filling valves
– Megger-Ohm test of Cargo pumps
– Ship / Shore Connection
173
� Readiness
• Preparation of a ship before loading– After dry dock
» Inserting dry air ( bottom in – top out )
» Inerting the tanks ( Bottom in – top out )
o Why: to get out the flammable range
» Gas filling ( top in – bottom out )
o Why: carbondioxide freezes and produces white powder
– Cooling down» Why: limiting boil off & capacity of nitrogen generator & to
avoid metal cracks
• After ballast voyage– Long voyage
» Gathering LNG into one tank
» Before arrival: cooling down
– Short voyage» LNG in all tanks
» Before arrival: cooling down
174
Leaving Drydock
175
INSERTING DRY AIR
176
Inserting dry air
� Bottom in – Top out
� Drying tanks: What’s the danger of wet air inside?• Forming ice
• Formation of corrosive agents
� Measurement• Dewpoint meter
• Dewpoint : - 40°C
� Time needed:• +/- 20 hours
177
Wet air – dry air
� Density
• Mass divided by volume (m/V)
• Increases when
– Mass increases while volume remains constant
– Volume decreases while mass remains constant
� Composition of air (T = 15°C; P = 101325 Pa)
0.0000087 %XeXenon
0.00005 %HHydrogen
0.000114 %KrKrypton
0.000524 %HeHelium
0.0002 %CH4Methane
0.001818 %NeNeon
0.0314 %CO2Carbon Dioxide
0.934 %ArArgon
20.9476 %O2Oxygen
78.084 %N2Nitrogen
Percent by volumeSymbolName
178
Wet air – dry air
� Density of air
• Varies with T and moisture
– T increase – higher molecular motion – expansion of volume
» DECREASE IN DENSITY
– Two most abundant elements in air : O2 and N2
» O2 = 32 g/mol
» N2 = 28 g/mol
» H2O = 18 g/mol
H2O is a relatively light gas when compared with O2 and N2
When water vapor increases, the amount of O2 and N2 per unit volume will decrease – mass is decreasing
» DECREASE IN DENSITY
179
Wet air – dry air
D = density in kg/m³
Rdry air = R / Mair = 8.314510/0.028965 = 287,05 J/kg K
Rwater vapor = R/Mwater vapor = 8.314510/0.01801646 = 461.495
J/kg K
Pdry air = partial pressure of dry air in Pa
Pwater vapor = partial pressure of water vapor in Pa
T = temperature in K
Partial pressure = Molar fraction * total pressure
TR
P
TR
P
** D
rwater vapo
rwater vapo
airdry
airdry +=
180
Example calculation density air
Ptotal = 101325 Pa
T = 15 °C = 15 + 273.15 K = 288.15 K
• Dry air:
• Wet air:
Xwater vapor = 0.15
Xdry air = 0.85
³/ 2250.115.288*05.287
101325
* D
airdry
airdry mkg
TR
P===
³/ 1555.115.288*495.461
101325*15.0
15.288*05.287
101325*85.0
** D
rwater vapo
rwater vapo
airdry
airdry mkg
TR
P
TR
P=+=+=
181
INERTING
182
Flammable range
183
Inerting
� Bottom in – Top out
� Why:
• To get out the flammable range
� Specification:
• Oxygen content less than 1%
• Dewpoint below –40°C
� Remaining lines
• Nitrogen
184
GAS FILLING: STAGE 1
185
Gas Filling: Stage 1
� Top in – bottom out
� Why:
• Unlike N2 inert gas contains 15% carbondioxide
• Freezes and forms white powder
• Block valves, filters, nozzles
� Stage 1
• 5% methane
� Stage 2
• 80% Methane
• CO2 less than 1%
� Time needed
• 14h to 16h
186
GAS FILLING: STAGE 2
187
COOLING DOWN
188
Cooling down
� Limited
• To avoid active pump tower stress
• More boil off than the HD can handle
• To remain in the capacity of the nitrogen system (barriers)
� 6 Temp sensors
• Average lowest 4: -130°C
� First time loading
• More boil off (adjacent spaces still hot )
� Time needed
• +/- 10 hours
189
Entering drydock
190
LNG STRIPPING PUMP
� Stripping pump
• +/- 2 cm
� Heating up
• Recirculation heated vapour by two HD
• Excessive vapour: ventmast
� Purging
• Till hydrocarbon content is less than 1,5%
• +/- 20 hours
� Dry air
• Ready
– 20% O2
– Less than 0,2 volume% Methane
– Dewpoint below –40°C
191
TANK WARM UP
192
INERTING
193
AERATION
8. Cargo Handling & Control- loading- discharge
195
� Arrival in port• Connecting + Purging
• Safety meeting + checklist
• Stop gasburning
• ESD tests– Ship – Shore
– Shore – Ship
• Custody Transfer Inspection and Certification – Manifold closed
• Cooling down liquid lines + shore arms
• Start loading
• Loading completed
• Draining + purging
• Custody Transfer Inspection and Certification– Manifold closed
• Start gasburning
• Disconnecting
196
CARGO LINES COOL DOWN
197
LOADING WITH VAPOUR RETURN
198
CARGO LINES COOL DOWN
199
DISCHARGING WITH VAPOUR RETURN
200
� Custody transfer
• Ship side
– Survey or push on the button
• Surveyor
– Calculation primary system
– Calculation secondary system
– Calculation heel
– Calculation boil off
– Pressure
– Temperature
– Witnessing sampling
– Anticipate on any potential non-conformities
– Time-log and statements of facts
201
� Custody transfer
• Density
– Difference between density departure and density arrival
– Light product evaporates first
• GCV / GHV
– Gross Calorific Value / Gross heating Value
– GCV of gas corresponds to the quantity of heat produced by complete combustion in air of a unit of volume or mass of the gas
– Unit: BTU ( British Thermal Unit )
• Vapour return
202
� Custody transfer
• LNG report
– Summary of findings
– Certificate of analysis
– Calculation density, BTU,…
– Quantity calculation
» Primary
» Secondary
– Fuel oil bunkers
– Diesel oil bunkers
– General notes
» Vessel operation
» Shore operation
– Time log
– Note of protest
203
CUSTODY TRANSFER ( SHIP )
204
CUSTODY TRANSFER ( SHIP )
205
CUSTODY TRANSFER ( SHIP )
206
CUSTODY TRANSFER: SGS
CONTRACT # 1Page 1
TRUNKLINE LNG / LAKE CHARLES, LA
SGS Office :
2
3
4
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
LNG QUANTITY REPORT
CLOSING CUSTODY TRANSFER REPORT - PRIMARY
CLOSING CUSTODY TRANSFER REPORT - SECONDARY
OPENING CUSTODY TRANSFER REPORT - PRIMARY
OPENING CUSTODY TRANSFER REPORT - SECONDARY
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
FUEL OIL BUNKER REPORT
DIESEL OIL BUNKER REPORT
GENERAL NOTES ON SHORE OPERATIONS
GENERAL NOTES ON VESSEL OPERATIONS
TIME LOG
LETTER OF PROTEST
Phone Number : 337-625-1455
:DATESSGS FILE #
:
R.U.R. / GDF INTL.1223
LIQUEFIED NATURAL GASDISCHARGE REPORT
:VESSEL NAME LNG HILLI258:
Date
29/jan/04
Lake Charles, La
TERMINAL / PORT
REFERENCE #
:::
CLIENTS
JANUARY 27-28, 2004710847
VOYAGE #
PAGEDOCUMENTS ENCLOSED
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13.1-4
14.1-4
SGS NORTH AMERICA INC.
4701 EAST NAPOLEON STREET
SULPHUR, LOUISIANA 70663
ISSUANCE OF THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT EXONERATE BUYERS OR SELLERS FROM EXERCISING ALL THEIR RIGHTS AND
DISCHARGING ALL THEIR LIABILITIES UNDER THE CONTRACT OF SALE. STIPULATIONS TO THE CONTRARY ARE NOT
BINDING ON US. THE COMPANY'S RESPONSIBILITY UNDER THI
THIS CERTIFICATE REFLECTS OUR FINDINGS AT THE TIME AND PLACE INDICATED AND IS ISSUED IN PURSUANCE OF
PRINCIPALS INSTRUCTIONS AND IN CONFORMITY WITH OUR GENERAL CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS DERIVED FROM THOSE
OF THE INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF INSPECTION AGENCIE
Larry Wallace
9. The economical consequences in using different LNG standards
208
� Typical values
• 138000 m³
• 60000 tons of LNG
• 3130000 MMBTU
• US $ 6,807 / MMBTU
• 21 305 910 US $ / cargo
209
Transferred energy
• Etransferred = energy transferred from loading facilities to LNG carrier of
from LNG carrier to unloading facilities
• DLNG = Density of LNG loaded or unloaded (kg/m³)
• VLNG = Volume of LNG loaded or unloaded (m³)
• GHV = Gross Heating Value of LNG loaded or unloaded (MJ/kg or
MMBTU/kg): quantity of heat produced by complete combustion in air of a unit of
volume or mass of the gas, at a constant absolute pressure of 1,01325 bar and at a
temperature T
• Egas displaced = quantity of energy in gaseous form displaced during loading
or unloading (MMBTU)
displacedgasLNGLNGLNGdtransferre EGHVVDE ** −=
210
Displaced energy
• Egas displaced = energy of the gas which is
– sent back onshore by the LNG carrier when loading
– Received by the LNG carrier when unloading
• Tvap = mean value of the temperatures of the probes not immersed in LNG (°C)
• Pvap = absolute pressure in the tanks (bar)
• GHVgas = GCV of the gas in gaseous state contained in the ship’s tanks (MJ/m³
or MMBTU/m³)
gasvap
vapLNGdisplacedgas GHV
P
TVE *
01325.1*
15.273
15.273*
+=
211
Using different LNG standards
� International standards
• NBS Measurement Study – 1985
• ISO 13398 LNG procedure for Custody transfer on board ships
• G.I.I.G.N.L. LNG Custody Transfer Handbook
• ISO – GPA – IP – ASTM
• Klosek McKinley revised
212
Using different standards
� Xi, Xn, Xm determined by analysis in gas chromatograph• Xi: Molar fraction of the ith component
• Xn: Molar fraction of Nitrogen
• Xm: Molar fraction of Methane
� Mi by standard• Molecular mass of the ith component
� Vi by standard and dependent on Tliq
• Molecular volume of the ith component
� K1, k2 by standard and dependent on Tliq and molar mass• Correction factors for Nitrogen and Methane
0.0425
Density = Σ ( Xi * Mi )
Σ ( Xi * Vi ) – [(k1 + (k2 – k1)*Xn) * Xm]
213
Using different LNG standards
0,0002820,0001340,03848916,6750ISO 6578 & ISO 6578
0,0002360,0001300,03848516,6750ISO 6578 & NBS TN 1030
0,0002770,0001340,03848516,6750ISO 6578 & NBS IR 77-867
0,0002820,0001350,03848916,6754ISO 6976 & ISO 6578
0,0002360,0001300,03848516,6754ISO 6976 & NBS TN 1030
0,0002770,0001340,03848516,6754ISO 6976 & NBS IR 77-867
0,0002810,0001340,03848916,6744GPA 2145 & ISO 6578
0,0002360,0001300,03848516,6744GPA 2145 & NBS TN 1030
0,0002760,0001340,03848516,6744GPA 2145 & NBS IR 77-867
K2 factorK1 factorΣ(Xi*Vi)Σ(Xi*Mi)Used standard
214
Using different LNG standards
434,7074ISO 6578ISO 6578
434,7078NBS TN 1030ISO 6578
434,7506NBS IR 77-867ISO 6578
434,7190ISO 6578ISO 6976
434,7194NBS TN 1030ISO 6976
434,7622NBS IR 77-867ISO 6976
434,6906ISO 6578GPA 2145
434,6911NBS TN 1030GPA 2145
434,7339NBS IR 77-867GPA 2145
Density (kg/m³)Used standard (k1, k2, Vi)Used standard (Mi)
MIN
MAX
Difference between min and max = 0,0716 kg/m³
⇒⇒⇒⇒ US $ 3540
215
Using different LNG standards
� Xi determined by analysis in gas chromatograph
� Hmi by standard
• Molecular Gross Heating Value
� Mi by standard
∑∑
=)*(
)**(
MiXi
MiHmiXiHm
216
Using different LNG standards
44,009844,010044,010Carbon Dioxide
28,013428,013528,013Nitrogen
86,176686,177086,175N-Hexane
72,149872,150072,149Iso Pentane
72,149872,150072,149N-Pentane
58,123058,123058,122Iso Butane
58,123058,123058,122N-Butane
44,096244,097044,096Propane
30,069430,070030,069Ethane
16,042616,043016,042Methane
Mi (ISO 6578)Mi (ISO 6976)Mi (GPA 2145)Component
217
Using Different LNG Standards
0,0000,0000,000Carbon Dioxide
0,0000,0000,000Nitrogen
48,71648,72048,717N-Hexane
48,93948,95048,950Iso Pentane
49,05149,04049,046N-Pentane
49,39749,39049,389Iso Butane
49,54149,55049,547N-Butane
50,38950,37050,370Propane
51,92551,95051,952Ethane
55,55855,57455,576Methane
Hmi (ISO 6578)Hmi (ISO 6976)Hmi (GPA 2145)Component
218
Using different LNG standards
921,5721
921,5947
921,3032
Σ (Xi*Mi*Hmi)
16,6744GPA 2145
16,6754ISO 6976
16,6750ISO 6578
Σ (Xi*Mi)Used standard
219
Using different LNG standards
55,2686GPA 2145
55,2667ISO 6976
55,2506ISO 6578
GHV (MJ/kg)Used standard
MIN
MAX
Difference between min and max = 0,018 MJ/kg
⇒⇒⇒⇒ US $ 7011
220
Using different LNG standards
� Combination of D and GHV to calculate Etransferred
⇒ 27 different results between 3131171 MMBTU and 3132717 MMBTU
⇒⇒⇒⇒ US $ 10524
221
3132209,441610197,03563142406,4771434,7074ISO 6578 & ISO 657855,2667ISO 6976138000,000
3132212,458610197,03563142409,4941434,7078ISO 6578 & NBS TN 103055,2667ISO 6976138000,000
3132521,977210197,03563142719,0128434,7506ISO 6578 & NBS IR 77-86755,2667ISO 6976138000,000
3132293,312010197,03563142490,3476434,7190ISO 6976 & ISO 657855,2667ISO 6976138000,000
3132296,055710197,03563142493,0913434,7194ISO 6976 & NBS TN 103055,2667ISO 6976138000,000
3132605,770610197,03563142802,8061434,7622ISO 6976 & NBS IR 77-86755,2667ISO 6976138000,000
3132087,994710197,03563142285,0303434,6906GPA 2145 & ISO 657855,2667ISO 6976138000,000
3132091,407410197,03563142288,4429434,6911GPA 2145 & NBS TN 103055,2667ISO 6976138000,000
3132400,641910197,03563142597,6775434,7339GPA 2145 & NBS IR 77-86755,2667ISO 6976138000,000
3132320,919510197,03563142517,9551434,7074ISO 6578 & ISO 657855,2686GPA 2145138000,000
3132323,936610197,03563142520,9722434,7078ISO 6578 & NBS TN 103055,2686GPA 2145138000,000
3132633,466310197,03563142830,5018434,7506ISO 6578 & NBS IR 77-86755,2686GPA 2145138000,000
3132404,792910197,03563142601,8285434,7190ISO 6976 & ISO 657855,2686GPA 2145138000,000
3132407,536710197,03563142604,5723434,7194ISO 6976 & NBS TN 103055,2686GPA 2145138000,000
3132717,262610197,03563142914,2982434,7622ISO 6976 & NBS IR 77-86755,2686GPA 2145138000,000
3132199,468410197,03563142396,5039434,6906GPA 2145 & ISO 657855,2686GPA 2145138000,000
3132202,881110197,03563142399,9167434,6911GPA 2145 & NBS TN 103055,2686GPA 2145138000,000
3132512,126710197,03563142709,1622434,7339GPA 2145 & NBS IR 77-86755,2686GPA 2145138000,000
Qnet (MMBTU)Qr(MMBTU)
Qtotal(MMBTU)
D (kg/m³)Hm (Mj/kgV (m³)
222
3131292,524410197,03563141489,5600434,7074ISO 6578 & ISO 657855,2506ISO 6578138000,000
3131295,540510197,03563141492,5761434,7078ISO 6578 & NBS TN 103055,2506ISO 6578138000,000
3131604,968910197,03563141802,0045434,7506ISO 6578 & NBS IR 77-86755,2506ISO 6578138000,000
3131376,370410197,03563141573,4059434,7190ISO 6976 & ISO 657855,2506ISO 6578138000,000
3131379,113310197,03563141576,1488434,7194ISO 6976 & NBS TN 103055,2506ISO 6578138000,000
3131688,737810197,03563141885,7734434,7622ISO 6976 & NBS IR 77-86755,2506ISO 6578138000,000
3131171,113010197,03563141368,1486434,6906GPA 2145 & ISO 657855,2506ISO 6578138000,000
3131174,524710197,03563141371,5602434,6911GPA 2145 & NBS TN 103055,2506ISO 6578138000,000
3131483,669010197,03563141680,7046434,7339GPA 2145 & NBS IR 77-86755,2506ISO 6578138000,000
Qnet (MMBTU)Qr(MMBTU)
Qtotal(MMBTU)
D (kg/m³)Hm (Mj/kgV (m³)
223
Using same standard under different conditions
� Calculation of GHV according ISO 6976
• 0°C
• 15°C
• 20°C
• 25°C
Difference in energy value is 8180 MMBTU
⇒⇒⇒⇒ US $ 55681
224
� Typical values
• 138000 m³
• 60000 tons of LNG
• 3130000 MMBTU
• HH: US $ 6,807 / MMBTU
• 21 305 910 US $ / cargo
The economical losses due to the inaccuracy of the custody transfer system
226
Level measurements
� Usually 2 level gauges per tank
• Primary
• Secondary
• Mechanical float gauge principle
• Automatic gauging principle (capacitance or radar)
• Accuracy according to the industry: ± 7,5 mm
~ 9,5 tons
~ US $ 3369
227
Temperature measurement
� Temperature gauging devices
• Built in thermo wells or installed as single probes
• Usually 5 or 6 probes
• Mostly of a resistance type – PT 100 systems
• Accuracy as good as ± 0,3°C
~ 3137 MMBTU
⇒⇒⇒⇒ US $ 21354
228
Pressure measurement
� Pressure readouts
• For safety reasons and for monitoring the boil-off process
• Represent no major error
• Accuracy is about ± 1% of full scale
229
Overall inaccuracy
± 0.60 %± 0.49 %TOTAL INACCURACY OBTAINED by QUADRATIC COMBINATION OF MEASUREMENTS
± 0.41 %± 0.35 %Overall GCV inaccuracy
± 0.04 %± 0.04 %GCV of the components (NBS)
± 0.1 %± 0.03 %Calibration gas (NBS) (weighting process)
± 0.3 %± 0.3 %Inaccuracy sampling (NBS)
GROSS CALORIFIC VALUE
± 0.31 %± 0.27 %Overall density inaccuracy
± 0.20 %± 0.15 %Temperature measurement
± 0.09 %± 0.09 %Gas analysis (NBS)
± 0.10 %± 0.10 %NBS estimate of LNG measurement
DENSITY
± 0.30%± 0.21%Liquid + vapour boil-off + vapour displaced
VOLUME
SGSSurvey
INDUSTRYperception
Inaccuracy of Measurement
230
Overall inaccuracy
� In Energy value this inaccuracy represents according:
61 mio US$50 mio US$Est. loss over 20 years contract
128 kUS$104 kUS$Energy value in US $
± 0,60%± 0,49%Inaccuracy
REAL WORLDINDUSTRY
Identifying the possible technical risks and economical consequences during the custody transfer measurement and analysis
232
� Cargo value based on measurement parameters
• Level
• Pressure
• Temperature
• Volume calibration
• Sampling
• Gas testing
• Cargo (vapour/liquid) remainders
• Vapors displaced/boil-off
233
Measurement ignorance
� Full or empty liquid lines on board
(before/after – loading/discharge)
average vessel: 46 tons
→ US$ 16403
� Vapour phase accounted before/after discharge/loading
difference: 192 tons
→ US$ 68463
234
Measurement errors - Density
� Parameters influenced by T
• k1
• k2
• Vi
� E.g.
• Actual Tliquid = -161°C
– D = 434.7074 kg/m³
– E = 3131292.5244 MMBTU
• Measured Tliquid = -160.5°C
– D = 434.0052 kg/m³
– E = 3126218.1013 MMBTU
( )Xm
XnkkkViXi
MiXiD
*0425.0
*121)*(
)*(
∑
∑
−+−
=
∆E = 5074 MMBTU
∆∆∆∆$ = US $ 34539
235
� Influenced by• Measurement of trim
• Measurement of list
• Measurement of level
• T (only for float gauge)
• D (only for float gauge)
� E.g. (list = -1°to port, level = 26700 mm) – TANK 1• Actual trim = -2m by stern
– V = 21902.804 m³
– E = 496986.1335 MMBTU
• Measured trim = -1.80 by stern– V = 21905.200 m³
– E = 497040.5000 MMBTU
∆E = 54 MMBTU
∆∆∆∆$ = US $ 367
Measurement errors - Volume
236
Measurement errors - Volume
� E.g. (list = -1°to port, level = 26700 mm) – TANK 2,3 or 4
• Actual trim = -2m by stern
– V = 40287.587 m³
– E = 914146.5217 MMBTU
• Measured trim = -1.80 by stern
– V = 40300.456 m³
– E = 914438.5261 MMBTU
� Total loss
367 + (3 * 1988) = US $ 6331
∆E = 292 MMBTU∆∆∆∆$ = US $ 1988*3 (3 tanks) = US $ 5964
237
Measurement errors - Volume
� E.g. (list = -1°to port, trim = -2m by stern) – TANK 1• Actual level = 26700 mm
– V = 21902.804 m³
– E = 496986.1335 MMBTU
• Measured level = 26600 mm– V = 21872.256 m³
– E = 496292.9834 MMBTU
� E.g. (list = -1°to port, trim = -2m by stern) – TANK 2,3 or 4• Actual level = 26700 mm
– V = 40287.587 m³
– E = 914146.5217 MMBTU
• Measured level = 26600 mm– V = 40229.466 m³
– E = 912827.7257 MMBTU
� Max loss: US $ 31.633
∆E = 693 MMBTU
∆∆∆∆$ = US $ 4717
∆E = 1318 MMBTU
∆∆∆∆$ = US $ 8972
*3 (3 tanks) = US $ 26916
238
Measurement errors - Displaced energy
� Influenced by
• Tvap
• Pvap
• VLNG
� E.g.
• Actual Tvap = -115°C
– Edisplaced = 10197.0356 MMBTU
– Etransferred = 3131292.5244 MMBTU
• Measured Tvap = -114.5°C
– Edisplaced = 10164.8987 MMBTU
– Etransferred = 3131324.6613 MMBTU
∆E = 32 MMBTU
∆∆∆∆$ = US $ 218
239
Measurement errors - Displaced energy
� E.g.
• Actual Pvap = 1150 mbar
– Edisplaced = 10197.0356 MMBTU
– Etransferred = 3131292.5244 MMBTU
• Measured Pvap = 1140 mbar
– Edisplaced = 10108.3657 MMBTU
– Etransferred = 3131381.1943 MMBTU
∆E = 89 MMBTU
∆∆∆∆$ = US $ 606
240
Measurement errors
� Accuracy and correctness of measurement parameters
US$ 60689 MMBTUPvap = 1140 mbarPvap = 1150 mbar
US$ 21832 MMBTUTvap = -114,5°CTvap = -115°C
US$ 8.972(tank 2,3 or 4)
1318 MMBTULevel = 26600 mmLevel = 26700 mm
US$ 4.717 (tank 1)693 MMBTULevel = 26600 mmLevel = 26700 mm
US$ 1.988(tank 2,3 or 4)
292 MMBTUTrim = -1,8m by sternTrim = -2m by stern
US$ 368 (tank 1)54 MMBTUTrim = -1,8m by sternTrim = -2m by stern
US$ 34.5395074 MMBTUTliq = -160,5°CTliq = -161°C
Difference in ValueDifference in Etransferred
Measured ParameterActual Parameter
241
Measurement errors
� Estimated loss over 20 years contract (2 voyages/month)
35.197.440TOTAL
290.880∆ Pvap = 10 mbar
104.640∆ Tvap = 0,5°C
15.183.840∆ Level = 10 cm
3.039.360∆ Trim = 20 cm
16.578.720∆ Tliq = 0,5°C
Loss (US $)Parameter
10. LNG Safety
243
WISH YOU A SAFE OPERATION
Thank you Sven