living in the environment, 18etvhsapes.weebly.com/uploads/7/5/9/5/75954777/chapter_21_notes.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
© Cengage Learning 2015
LIVING IN THE ENVIRONMENT, 18e G. TYLER MILLER • SCOTT E. SPOOLMAN
© Cengage Learning 2015
21 Solid and Hazardous Waste
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Electronic waste (e-waste) is the fastest
growing solid waste problem
• Most ends up in landfills and incinerators
• Composition includes:
– High-quality plastics
– Valuable metals
– Toxic and hazardous pollutants
Core Case Study: E-Waste – An Exploding
Problem
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Shipped to other countries
• International Basel Convention
– Bans transferring hazardous wastes from
developed countries to developing countries
• European Union
– Cradle-to-grave approach
Core Case Study: E-Waste – An Exploding
Problem (cont’d.)
Fig. 21-1, p. 576
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Solid waste contributes to pollution and
includes valuable resources that could be
reused or recycled
• Hazardous waste contributes to pollution,
as well as to natural capital degradation,
health problems, and premature deaths
21-1 What Are Solid Waste and Hazardous
Waste, and Why Are They Problems?
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Solid waste
– Industrial solid waste
• Mines, farms, industries
– Municipal solid waste (MSW)
• Trash
• Waste ends up in:
– Rivers, lakes, the ocean, and natural
landscapes
We Throw Away Huge Amounts of Useful
Things
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Hazardous waste (toxic waste)
– Threatens human health of the environment
• Classes of hazardous waste
– Organic compounds
– Toxic heavy metals
– Radioactive waste
Hazardous Waste Is a Serious and
Growing Problem
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Leader in solid waste problem
– In trash production, by weight, per person
• 98.5% of all solid waste is industrial waste
• Most wastes break down very slowly
– If at all
Case Study: Solid Waste in the United
States
Fig. 21-5, p. 579
© Cengage Learning 2015
• A sustainable approach to solid waste is:
– First to reduce it
– Then to reuse or recycle it
– Finally, to safely dispose of what is left
21-2 How Should We Deal with Solid
Waste?
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Waste management
– Reduce harm, but not amounts
• Waste reduction
– Use less and focus on reuse, recycle,
compost
• Integrated waste management
– Uses a variety of strategies
We Can Burn, Bury, or Recycle Solid
Waste or Produce Less of It
© Cengage Learning 2015
Fig. 21-6, p. 581
Raw materials
Processing and
manufacturing Products
Solid and hazardous wastes generated
during the manufacturing process
Waste generated by households
and businesses
Food/yard waste
Hazardous waste
Remaining mixed waste Plastic Glass Metal Paper
To manufacturers for reuse
or for recycling Compost Hazardous waste
management Landfill Incinerator
Fertilizer
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Waste reduction is based on:
– Refuse – don’t use it
– Reduce – use less
– Reuse – use it over and over
– Recycle
• Composting
– Using bacteria to decompose biodegradable
waste
We Can Cut Solid Wastes by Refusing,
Reducing, Reusing, and Recycling
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Six strategies:
– Change industrial processes to eliminate
harmful chemicals
– Redesign manufacturing process to use less
material and energy
– Develop products that are easy to recycle
– Eliminate unnecessary packaging
– Use fee-per-bag waste collection systems
– Establish cradle-to grave responsibility
Refusing, Reducing, Reusing, and
Recycling (cont’d.)
© Cengage Learning 2015
Fig. 21-7, p. 581
What We Should Do What We Do
Reduce
Reuse
Recycle/Compost
Incinerate
Bury Reduce
(<0.1%)
Reuse (0.2%)
Incinerate (9%)
Recycle/Compost (23.7%)
Bury (67%)
© Cengage Learning 2015
• By refusing and reducing resource use
and by reusing and recycling what we use,
we:
– Decrease our consumption of matter and
energy resources
– Reduce pollution and natural capital
degradation
– Save money
21-3 Why Are Refusing, Reducing,
Reusing, and Recycling So Important?
© Cengage Learning 2015
• We increasingly substitute throwaway
items for reusable ones
• In general, reuse is on the rise
• One solution: taxing plastic shopping bags
– Ireland, Taiwan, the Netherlands
There Are Alternatives to the Throwaway
Economy
© Cengage Learning 2015
Fig. 21-11, p. 583
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Primary, closed-loop recycling
– Materials recycled into same type
• Secondary recycling
– Materials converted to other products: tires
• Types of wastes that can be recycled
– Preconsumer, internal waste generated in
manufacturing process
– Postconsumer, external waste generated by
product use
There Is Great Potential for Recycling
© Cengage Learning 2015
• With incentives, the U.S. could recycle and
compost 80% of its municipal solid waste
• Composting
– Mimics nature’s recycling of nutrients
– Resulting organic matter can be used to:
• Supply plant nutrients
• Slow soil erosion
• Retain water
• Improve crop yield
There Is Great Potential for Recycling
(cont’d.)
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Materials-recovery facilities (MRFs)
– Can encourage increased trash production
• Source separation
– Pay-as-you-throw
– Fee-per-bag
We Can Mix or Separate Household Solid
Wastes for Recycling
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Production of paper versus recycled paper
– Energy use – world’s fifth largest consumer
– Water use
– Pollution
• Easy to recycle
– Uses 64% less energy
– Produces 35% less water pollution
– Produces 74% less air pollution
Recycling Paper
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Plastics
– Composed of resins created from oil and
natural gas
• Currently only 7% is recycled in the U.S.
– Many types of plastic resins
– Difficult to separate
Recycling Plastics
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Advantages
– Net economic health
– Environmental benefits
• Disadvantages
– Costly
• Single-pickup system
– No separation needed
Recycling Has Advantages and
Disadvantages
© Cengage Learning 2015
Fig. 21-14, p. 585
Trade-Offs
Disadvantages
Recycling
Reduces energy
and mineral use
and air and water
pollution
Can cost more than
burying in areas with
ample landfill space
Reduces
greenhouse
gas emissions
Reduces profits for
landfill and
incinerator owners
Reduces solid waste Inconvenient for
some
Advantages
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Technologies for burning and burying solid
wastes are well developed
– However, burning contributes to air and water
pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, and
buried wastes eventually contribute to the
pollution and degradation of land and water
resources
21-4 The Advantages and Disadvantages
of Burning or Burying Solid Waste
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Waste-to-energy incinerators
– To heat water or produce electricity
• Landfills emit more air pollutants than
modern waste-to-energy incinerators
– Toxic chemicals that are filtered must be
disposed of or stored
Burning Solid Waste Has Advantages and
Disadvantages
© Cengage Learning 2015
Fig. 21-15, p. 588
Electricity
Smokestack
Furnace
Boiler
Waste
pit
Ash for treatment,
disposal in landfill, or
use as landfill cover
Fig. 21-16, p. 588
Waste-to-Energy Incineration
Advantages Disadvantages
Produces energy Produces a
hazardous waste
Concentrates
hazardous
substances into
ash for burial
Emits some CO2 and
other air pollutants
Sale of energy
reduces cost
Encourages waste
production
Reduces trash
volume
Trade-Offs
Expensive to build
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Sanitary landfills
– Compacted layers of waste between clay or
foam
– Bottom liners; containment systems
• Open dumps
– Widely used in less-developed countries
• Rare in developed countries
– Large pit
• Sometimes garbage is burned
Burying Solid Waste Has Advantages and
Disadvantages
Fig. 21-17, p. 589
When landfill is full, layers
of soil and clay seal in trash Topsoil
Sand Electricity
generator
building Clay
Garbage
Methane
storage and
compressor
building Leachate
treatment system
Probes to
detect
methane
leaks
Pipes collect explosive methane for use as fuel to generate electricity
Methane gas recovery well
Leachate storage tank
Compacted solid waste
Garbage Leachate pipes
Leachate pumped up to storage tank for safe disposal
Groundwater
monitoring
well
Synthetic liner
Leachate
monitoring
well
Sand Groundwater
Clay Clay and plastic lining to
prevent leaks; pipes collect
leachate from bottom of landfill Subsoil
Sand
© Cengage Learning 2015
Fig. 21-18, p. 589
Trade-Offs
Sanitary Landfills
Advantages Disadvantages
Releases greenhouse
gases (methane and
CO2) unless they are
collected
Can handle large
amounts of waste
Filled land can
be used for
other purposes
Output approach that
encourages waste
production
No shortage of
landfill space in
many areas
Eventually leaks and
can contaminate
groundwater
Low operating
costs
Noise, traffic,
and dust
© Cengage Learning 2015
• A more sustainable approach to
hazardous waste:
– First, produce less of it
– Then, reuse or recycle it
– Then, convert it to less-hazardous materials
– Finally, safely store what is left
21-5 How Should We Deal with Hazardous
Waste?
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Integrated management of hazardous
wastes
– Produce less
– Convert to less hazardous substances
– Rest in long-term safe storage
• Increased use for postconsumer
hazardous waste
We Can Use Integrated Management of
Hazardous Waste
Put in
Perpetual Storage
Landfill
Underground injection wells
Surface impoundments
Underground salt formations
Stepped Art
Convert to Less Hazardous or
Nonhazardous Substances
Natural decomposition
Incineration
Thermal treatment
Chemical, physical, and biological
treatment
Dilution in air or water
Produce Less
Hazardous Waste
Change industrial processes
to reduce or eliminate
hazardous waste production
Recycle and reuse hazardous
waste
Fig. 21-20, p. 591
© Cengage Learning 2015
• 70% goes to China
– Hazardous working conditions
– Includes child workers
• U.S. produces roughly 50% of the world’s
e-waste
– Recycles only 14%
Case Study: Recycling E-Waste
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Collect and then detoxify
– Physical methods
– Chemical methods
– Use nanomagnets
– Bioremediation
– Phytoremediation
• Incineration
• Using a plasma arc torch
We Can Detoxify Hazardous Wastes
Fig. 21-22, p. 593
Radioactive contaminants
Organic contaminants
Inorganic metal contaminants
Poplar tree Brake fern
Sunflower Willow tree
Indian
mustard
Landfill Oil spill
Polluted groundwater in Decontaminated
water out Soil Polluted leachate Soil
Groundwater Groundwater
Rhizofiltration Roots of plants such as sunflowers with dangling roots on ponds or in greenhouses can absorb pollutants such as radioactive strontium-90 and cesium-137 and various organic chemicals.
Phytostabilization Plants such as willow trees and poplars can absorb chemicals and keep them from reaching groundwater or nearby surface water.
Phytodegredation Plants such as poplars can absorb toxic organic chemicals and break them down into less harmful compounds which they store or release slowly into the air.
Phytoextraction Roots of plants such as Indian mustard and brake ferns can absorb toxic metals such as lead, arsenic, and others and store them in their leaves. Plants can then be recycled or harvested and incinerated.
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Burial on land or long-term storage
– Last resort only
• Deep-well disposal
– 64% of hazardous liquid wastes in the U.S.
• Surface impoundments
– Lined pools for evaporation
• Secure hazardous waste landfills
– Expensive
We Can Store Some Forms of Hazardous
Waste
© Cengage Learning 2015
Fig. 21-24, p. 594
Deep-Well Disposal
Advantages Disadvantages
Safe if sites are
chosen carefully Leaks from corrosion
of well casing
Emits CO2 and
other air pollutants Wastes can often
be retrieved
Output approach that
encourages waste
production Low cost
Trade-Offs
© Cengage Learning 2015
Fig. 21-26, p. 594
Surface Impoundments
Advantages
Water pollution
from leaking liners
and overflows
Wastes can often
be retrieved Air pollution from
volatile organic
compounds
Can store wastes
indefinitely with
secure double
liners
Output approach that
encourages waste
production
Trade-Offs
Disadvantages
Low cost
© Cengage Learning 2015
Fig. 21-28, p. 595
© Cengage Learning 2015
• 1976 – Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA)
– EPA sets standards and gives permits
– Cradle to grave
– Covers only 5% of hazardous wastes
Case Study: Hazardous Waste Regulation
in the United States
© Cengage Learning 2015
• 1980 – Comprehensive Environmental,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)
– National Priorities List
• 2013 – 1320 Superfund sites; 365 cleaned
– Pace of cleanup has slowed
– Superfund is broke
• Laws encouraging the cleanup of
brownfields
– Abandoned industrial sites
Case Study: Hazardous Waste Regulation
in the United States (cont’d.)
© Cengage Learning 2015
Fig. 21-29, p. 596
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Shifting to a low-waste society requires
individuals and businesses to:
– Reduce resource use
– Reuse and recycle wastes at local, national,
and global levels
21-6 How Can We Make the Transition to
a More Sustainable Low-Waste Society?
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Prevent construction of:
– Incinerators, landfills, treatment plants,
polluting chemical plants
• Something must be done with hazardous
wastes
Grassroots Action Has Led to Better Solid
and Hazardous Waste Management
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Environmental justice
– Everyone is entitled to protection from
environmental hazards
• Which communities in the U.S. have the
largest share of hazardous waste dumps?
• Environmental discrimination
Providing Environmental Justice for
Everyone Is an Important Goal
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Factors that hinder reuse and recycling:
– Market prices do not include harmful costs
– Economic playing field is uneven
– Demand for recycled products fluctuates
• Governments can pass laws requiring
companies to reuse and recycle
We Can Encourage Reuse and Recycling
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Freecycle network
• Upcycling
– Recycling materials into products of higher
value
• Dual-use packaging
Reuse, Recycling, and Composting
Present Economic Opportunities
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Basel Convention
– 1992 – in effect
– 1995 amendment – bans all transfers of
hazardous wastes from industrialized
countries to less-developed countries
– 2012 – ratified by 179 countries, but not the
United States
International Treaties Have Reduced
Hazardous Waste
© Cengage Learning 2015
• 2000 – delegates from 122 countries
completed a global treaty
– Control 12 persistent organic pollutants
(POPs)
– DDT, PCBs, dioxins
– Everyone on earth has POPs in blood
• 2000 – Swedish Parliament law
– By 2020 ban all chemicals that are persistent
and can accumulate in living tissue
International Treaties Have Reduced
Hazardous Waste (cont’d.)
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Norway, Austria, and the Netherlands
– Committed to reduce resource waste by 75%
• Key principles
– Everything is connected
– There is no away
– Producers and polluters should pay
– We can mimic nature by recycling and
composting
We Can Make the Transition to Low-Waste
Societies
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Resource exchange webs
– Waste as raw material
– Ecoindustrial parks
• Two major steps of biomimicry
– Observe how natural systems respond
– Apply to human industrial systems
Case Study: Industrial Ecosystems:
Copying Nature
© Cengage Learning 2015
• Reduce outputs of solid hazardous waste
• Mimic nature’s chemical cycling process
– Reuse and recycle
• Integrated waste management
• Include harmful environmental and health
costs in market prices
Tying It All Together: E-Waste and
Sustainability