litigating #metoo civil assault cases: potential claims...
TRANSCRIPT
Litigating #MeToo Civil Assault Cases:
Potential Claims and Defendants, Proving
Liability, Evidentiary Issues
Today’s faculty features:
1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific
The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's
speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you
have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 1.
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 25, 2018
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A
John C. Clune, Member, Hutchinson Black and Cook, Boulder, Colo.
Kathy Harrington Sullivan, Partner, Barrett & Farahany, Atlanta
Tips for Optimal Quality
Sound Quality
If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality
of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet
connection.
If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial
1-866-869-6667 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please
send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately so we can address
the problem.
If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance.
Viewing Quality
To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen,
press the F11 key again.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Continuing Education Credits
In order for us to process your continuing education credit, you must confirm your
participation in this webinar by completing and submitting the Attendance
Affirmation/Evaluation after the webinar.
A link to the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation will be in the thank you email
that you will receive immediately following the program.
For additional information about continuing education, call us at 1-800-926-7926
ext. 2.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Program Materials
If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please
complete the following steps:
• Click on the ^ symbol next to “Conference Materials” in the middle of the left-
hand column on your screen.
• Click on the tab labeled “Handouts” that appears, and there you will see a
PDF of the slides for today's program.
• Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open.
• Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Civil Suit for SXA
• Why?
• Monetary damages
• Non-monetary objectives
• Establishes liability
• More relaxed burden
• Holds defendant accountable to victim
• 3rd party defendants
• With or without criminal case/conviction
• Plaintiff & defendant on more equal footing
6
Civil Suit for SXA
• Why not?
• Exclusion of intentional acts
• Stress
• Cost
• Time
• Unpredictability of jury verdict
• Judgment proof defendant
7
Civil Suit for SXA
• Who?
• Assailant +
• Employer
• School
• Parents
• Business
• Healthcare
• Housing
• Transportation
8
SXA at Work
Employer Liability Under Title VII
• EEOC
• RTS
• Severe or Pervasive standard
• Punitive damages depend on size of employer
• Ability to shift burden to employer
9
SXA in General
Personal Injury Claims
• Statute of Limitations
• No damage caps
• Less specific than criminal statutes
• Victim has more control over process
• Broader scope of protection than Title VII
• Drawbacks
11
SXA in General
Possible PI/tort/negligence claims:
• Assault
• Battery
• False Imprisonment
• Intentional/Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
• Negligent hiring/supervision/retention/entrustment
• Loss of Consortium
• Wrongful death
• Invasion of Privacy
• Premises Liability
• Malpractice
• Retaliation
12
Investigating the Claim
• Impact evidence :
• Victim testimony
• Witness testimony
• Testimony by victim’s family
• Letters from Psychiatrist/Therapist
• Before and after pictures of victim
13
Investigating the Claim
Employer knowledge
• Was management on notice?
• SXH policy
• History
• Defendant
• Employer
14
Investigating the Claim
• Me Too Evidence – most valuable!
• Challenge: Defense will try to keep out
• Best chance to get in: motive, intent, plan, employer’s
repeated practice, pretext, impeachment, rebuttal &
punitive damages
16
Common Motivations for filing
Perpetrator Claims
Poor experience with criminal
justice System
Poor experience
with campus response
Overriding sense that
perpetrator feels
empowered or not
affected
Trauma and the difficulty
to sit with what has
happened to survivor’s life
19
Positives of bringing claims
Control over the case: complaint, discovery,
deposition of perpetrator
Accountability
Empowerment
20
Downsides of bringing claims
Recovery is delayed
Perpetrator will engage in heavy victim blaming
Even if no media, these issues will all play out within social circles
Basic lack of privacy: texts, emails, social media, etc.
21
Establishing Liability
1. Address “He said she said” in jury selection.
2. Clients testimony and its internal credibility is
by itself enough for the verdict
3. Corroborating Medical evidence
4. Corroborating Outcry evidence
5. Treating Therapist: Corroborating diagnoses,
consistent statements, demeanor.
6. Defendant statements or lack thereof
28