The Writing Process: An Overview

English 102Deanna Dixon

Arguing Your Interpretation

Claim: Once you have decided to narrow in on a certain interpretation of a story, you must make a claim about that interpretation. To come up with your claim, relate some aspect of the work (setting, characters, symbols, etc) to the meaning of the whole, or the theme. This claim is known as your thesis statement. Remember, thesis = WHAT + HOW + WHY/SO WHAT? If you want to focus your paper in on your interpretation of the

character, Eveline, you could make the claim, “Eveline lacks courage to flee from her domineering father and to seek her own happiness when she refuses to board the ship with Frank, resulting in her perpetuation of a continuous cycle of unhappiness often experienced by Irish working-class women in the 1900s.”

Arguing Your Interpretation

Evidence: tells your readers how you have arrived at your interpretation; what is your claim based on?

Evidence will come from details in the story Some evidence may come from outside the text

(i.e. you could use info. about working-class Irish-Catholic women in Ireland in the early 1900s)

It is important to use some direct quotes from the text (see p. 27 for directions on how to use them correctly)

Arguing Your Interpretation

Reasoning: explain how you arrived at your claim using the evidence you have given

Refutation: acknowledging and responding to opposing viewpoints/opinions If/when you include a refutation, make sure

that you show why/how other interpretations are faulty or inaccurate or limited; you could present contrasting evidence or alternate reasoning

Sample plan for literary argument

Thesis: “Eveline lacks courage to flee from her domineering father and to seek her own happiness when she refuses to board the ship with Frank, resulting in her perpetuation of a continuous cycle of unhappiness often experienced by Irish working-class women in the 1900s.”

Evidence of Eveline’s lack of courage can be seen in the following: Her passivity as a female who lacks the resources and imagination to

challenge her traditional role Her physical fear of her father, perhaps generalized to all men Her reverence to her mother’s memory and the promise she made to

keep the family together Conclusion/So What?: Eveline exemplifies how a woman in

Ireland in the early 1900s may be trapped by passivity, fear, and obligations.

Avoid plot summary

Be careful not to get bogged down in mere summary. Assume that your audience has read the story and is familiar with the main plot points and characters. However, that doesn’t mean you can’t include a sentence or two of plot summary if you are reinforcing a certain interpretation or if a certain event or character is ambiguous and requires clarification/interpretation.

Topic Sentences

Every body paragraph must begin with a topic sentence the summarizes the main argument of the paragraph.

In order to avoid falling into a mere plot summary with your paper, try to avoid topic sentences that discuss plot points.

Topic sentences should be strictly critical observations that support/relate back to your thesis statement.

Critical Interpretation vs. Plot Summary

Notice the difference between a critical comment and a plot detail:Plot detail: Jackson’s story opens on a balmy summer day.

 Critical comment: By setting her story on a balmy summer day,

Jackson creates a false sense of well-being.  Plot detail: Granny detests Cornelia’s blue lampshades.  Critical comment: One of Cornelia’s blue lampshades becomes the image of Granny’s diminishing spark of life.

Combined: Although Granny detests Cornelia’s blue lampshades, one of them becomes the image of her diminishing spark of

life.

Introductions

Remember to focus your reader’s attention on the incident/character/symbol you find significant. Try to include something specific in the first sentence. For instance, always include the title (underlined or in quotation marks and the author of the work you will be discussing). Always include your thesis statement.

Conclusions

Do not simply repeat what you said in your introduction.

Answer the “so what?” question. Why is your particular interpretation important to understanding/appreciating the work?