list-of-court-quotes

7/29/2019 List-of-court-Quotes

1/39

LIST OF QUOTES FROM JACK SMITH AND OTHERS MOSTLY FROM AMERICAN SOURCES

Kindly shared by courtesy of Pierino from Adelaide expressly for your learning. Gods speed.

No specific order Numbering has started recently. Note coloured content tabs on right hand margin.

1 QUOTES[001]"The Public are told FAIRY STORIES. Every generation is told a MYTH and it's called "HISTORY". - Alan

Watt"Wars are very expensive. Wars take many many years of planning BEFORE they actually take place -NOTHING is ever spontaneous" - Alan WattThis is, NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN and the real facts of the day is that NOTHING happens bychance!

2 TURNING THE OTHER CHEEK[002]

This information is in relation to what we have been "indoctrinated" with and that is that we have been taught to"DEFEND" ourselves INSTEAD of"turning the other cheek".. Our "educators" understood VERY well whythey taught us and wanted us to DEFEND ourselves, for the reasons stated below!"It is the DEFENDING that CREATES the POWER. It's the "DEFENCE" which creates the FORCE. If you go

in there (into court) withNO DEFENCE, there isNO FORCE. ACCEPTANCE IS THE "KEY". They're NOT

used to "Acceptance" they're used to "Defence". The reason that they (the court) don't want anything to do withthis is because then they DON'T HAVE THE POWER!" - Sam Davis

3 PRIVATE CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE[003]

There is NOTHING Judicial even if you think youre in a judicial proceeding in the court, there is NO Judicialprocedure. All theyre trying to do is WRITE A CONTRACT and if you dont OFFERa PRIVATECONTRACT (Your Administrative process) for Public Acceptance theyll substitute a PUBLIC OFFERING(allegations/ assumptions & presumptions) for private acceptance, which is generally what gets everyone inprison (By Agreement) because 99.9% of people in prison are there of their own FREE WILL,, they volunteered,when they ACCEPTED the PUBLIC CONTRACT and didnt offer a PRIVATE CONTRACT forPUBLICACCEPTANCE. Jack Smith.

4 OFFER YOUR PRIVATE CONTRACT [004]

There is NO Law in their system and so EVERYTHING is a CONTRACT. The question is whether the publicis going to make the OFFERING and youre going to PRIVATELY ACCEPT it so thats the contract before theTribunal or whether youre going to propose a PRIVATE CONTRACT and get the public to ACCEPT yourPRIVATE CONTRACT because your private contract allows SETOFF and CLOSURE of the case. The publicOFFERING that they give to you does NOT allow SETOFF, youve got to pay the penalty and that penalty isgoing to be extracted from you to do a discharge and so would you rather discharge it and be penalized byPUBLIC POLICY or would you rather use the PRE-PAID account by giving YOUR PRIVATE OFFERINGand get the PUBLIC to accept it for SETOFF? Jack Smith.John, P - Read this paragraph VERY carefully and then read it AGAIN and then read it AGAIN. Whatis contained herein could actually give you the ANSWER to your SETOFF solution. Your private

paperwork, that includes EVERYTHING, can used as your "Private contract offering" for your

SETOFF! - Think about it!

5 NO COMMERCE IN HEAVEN [005] HEAVEN IS ACOMMERCIAL FREE ZONE! - Jack Smith.

6 THAT YOU SHALL DO [006]

PROPERTY RIGHTS many times are NOT affected solely by laws and statutes passed by legislature, that theMAJORITY of the times, property rights are AFFECTED BY CONTRACT rather than public statutes or

KLINGON LIST OF QUOTES from various contributors Page 1 of 39


2/39

legislation and I am trying to get the patriots, to see the possibility that PRIVATE CONTRACT is what isCREATING THE NEXUS between the IRS and the UNITED STATES (INC) and between these patriots thatare claiming there is NO law.Jack Smith.So if you CONTRACTED you have got a FIDUCIARY DUTY, in fact SCRIPTURE says Everything thatyou have set your hand to do sign on the dotted line and made a contract, THAT YOU SHALL DO! Jack Smith.

7 ALTERED BY CONTRACTS [007]The point is that ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY RIGHTS, and a property right includes ANY of yourUNALIENABLE RIGHTS under a NATURAL (Creators) LAW are ALTERED and AMENDED by YOURCONTRACTS that YOU make. Jack Smith."All rights MUST be reserved!" when signing ANY contract!"

8 REBUT THE PRESUMPTIONS[008]

Now rather than show up at a hearing and TESTIFY, what hes got to do is he has to bring EVIDENCE anda PETITION IN SUPPORT thereof to REBUT THE PRESUMPTION that there still is an outstandingobligation which has not been settled and closed. So what you need is EVIDENCE to REBUT thePRESUMPTION that there is a need for a DEBTORS EXAM and the way to do that is PRESENT THEEVIDENCE from the PRIVATE SECTOR that the matter is SETTLED AND CLOSED.Jack Smith.

Place your PRIVATE evidence (Not for public filing/disclosure) into the private evidence file of the court.

8a REVISED QUOTE[008A]

Now rather than show up at a hearing and TESTIFY, what YOU have got to do is you have to bringEVIDENCE and a PETITION IN SUPPORT thereof to REBUT THE PRESUMPTION that there still is anoutstanding obligation which has not been settled and closed. So what you need is EVIDENCE to REBUT thePRESUMPTION that there is a need for a DEBTORS EXAM and the way to do that is PRESENT THEEVIDENCE from the PRIVATE SECTOR that the matter is SETTLED AND CLOSED.So consequently

YOU have got to get the evidence into an EVIDENCE FOLDER, under that case number, and NOT into theGENERAL COURT FOLDER as though its being submitted as a PUBLIC document that is brought withpublic pleadings and is ARGUED on the public side of the court case. The EVIDENCE FOLDER is the

PRIVATE side of the caseJack Smith.

9 END GAME "LEGAL THEORY'- [009]

The GUILTY theory is based on the LEGAL THEORY of CONTRACT LAW! You had/have a DUTY toREBUT the PRESUMPTION OF EVIDENCE. You FAILED to rebut it so obviously there is NO REBUTTALso you are AGREEING youre guilty. We dont need evidence as long as we have got your CONSENT,agreement or contract. So you are found guilty BASED ON CONTRACT LAW. There is NO statute law, therewas no evidence, you are found guilty based on CONTRACT LAW which in Admiralty/Maritime is goodenough. It amounts to a CONFESSION in open court because YOU HAVE CONTRACTED THAT YOUREGUILTY. The reason you have contracted that youre guilty is because everybody in criminal law 101understands that in Admiralty youre GUILTY unless YOU PROVE that your innocent and everybody furtherunderstands that ALLEGATIONS by the prosecution or plaintiff in Admiralty, DO NOT have to be supported

by Affidavit or ANY evidence whatsoever.- Jack Smith.

10 UNALIENABLE RIGHTS [010]

One of the reasons why of course the Christian religion has been made fun of, intimidated and its power hasbeen eroded in our schools and our churches is BECAUSE it speaks to UNALIENABLE RIGHTS. Wellpeople who can basically LIE, for their living, living off the money ofTAXPAYERS, knowing what they areparticipating in a global scam in order that they might [1] Get rid of the people who might go against them and[2] to continue their absolutely insane wealth which is based on THEFT, on TAX THEFT, its based on FederalReserve theft, its based on CENTRAL BANKING THEFT. Nancy Levant



3/39

11 DNA PROFILING.1 [011]

What is PROFILING for especially when they (govt) are collecting DNA? PROFILING is really about

CONTROL. It is about IDENTIFYING who they believe are the COMPLIANT Global citizens. And who

are they concerned about as people who may RESIST. The other possibility of this and it is HIGHLY

suspect when they are collecting DNA. I believe that the top PRIORITY and mission of the one world

government movement is MASSIVE DEPOPULATION. It is the SCAM behind the environmentalist

movement. It is the SCAM behind global warming. They want to reduce the population by massive,massive numbers. Nancy Levant

11A DNA PROFILING .2 [011]

When our DNA is now required to be Data Based, we realized that NOT ONLY are we PROFILED as

Social Creatures, our educational levels, our health, our religions, our financial situations, our political

affiliations, we are now also PROFILED and DATABASED and stored basically to the molecular level.

Now whats that all about? WHAT IS PROFILING? From Infancy to eldership, every single thing that

we have done financially, politically, medically, socially and now our DNA now you have to make the

assumption that all of this Data Collection and storing of this information that there is an END, a purpose.

Why are they doing this? Its not just because they can. There are missions; there are intentions BEHIND

the profiling of the people of the world. Nancy Levant

12 YOUR RIGHTS [012]

'Your rights can NOT be claimed by your Lawyer or Solicitor. Your rights can ONLY be claimed by YOU, thebelligerent claimant in person" - George Gordon

13 LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS GONE [013]

If you want to know where your LIBERTIES and FREEDOMS have gone, they have gone to the InsuranceIndustry, called LIMITED LIABILITY. George Gordon

14 QUOTE [014]

"To Educate the mind without purifying the heart is but to place a sharp sword in the hands of a madman" -

Anonymous

15 HE'S MY BROTHER! - [015]

"The Messiah already paid the Full penalty for my sins and I have ACCEPTED his provisions. The Law is thusFULLY satisfied for my debts have been paid. Is this court here to collect something in order to balance theaccounts to set my debts straight? My Brother the Messiah, came in and paid them. Do we have any furtherbusiness here or may I now leave?"So Toady the Sojourners and Strangers that are waxed rich are the "living Souls". How come they're waxed rich?All their debts have been paid since 1933 under HJR-192 by the Bankers.[ I am strong, strong enough tocare! He's my Brother!]So we are rich, rich BEYOND BELIEF. He has NO CONCEPT that he (Man) hasbeen given a BLESSING BEYOND anything that money could EVER buy. You DON'T need money!To obtain Grace, the sinner must answer in such a way as this;

Your Honour, I admit that I am a sinner. I am guilty as charged. I confess that you are just in all your ways andyou may sentence me to death, however(Here comes the Defence This is the acceptance of the factsand the additional information, Confess all the facts as true and then give them additional facts foravoidance which gets you from EXECUTION into GRACE.] So the confession is Yep everything that youhave charged me with is true. Heres the AVOIDANCE.The Messiah already paid the FULL PENALTY for my sins and I have accepted his provision. The law is thusfull satisfied for my debts have been paid. Is this court here to collect something in order to balance the accountsin order to set my debts straight? My Brother came in and paid them. Do we have any further business here nowor may I now leave.



4/39

The Judge will answer; Let the record show that this mans sins have already been paid in full thereforethis court EXTENDS grace to him and releases him. He is no longer under the law, but in Grace. Go and

Sin no more! (Now thats a very simple concept!) JACK SMITH

16 PLEA BARGAIN AGREEMENTS [016]

In almost all criminal cases, the majority of criminal cases are SETTLED by a PLEA BARGAINAGREEMENT. A Plea Bargain agreement is nothing more than a CONTRACTbetween the prosecution and the

defence. The plea bargain agreement then becomes the CONTRACT which becomes usually at the majority ofthe times, the JUDGEMENT of the court by the AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES and then the execution isthen based on that contract and it has NOTHING to do with IN-LAW whatsoever. It hasNOTHING to dowith REALITY or the FACTS other than the fact that the parties have gotten together and AGREED BYCONTRACT that will allow the magistrate of the court to recognize an AGREEMENT and then execute on it.This pleas bargain can be proposed by the PRIVATE party or the PUBLIC i.e. the prosecution and the party thatPROPOSES is the party that is in CONTROL.Jack Smith.

17 THE COURT SYSTEM [017]

Prior to 1933 when men and women were presumed under the protections of the NATURAL-LAW byPUBLICLAW then in the courts, the SUBSTANCE and the FACTS were ALL relevant and TRUTH by wayof Affidavits and other forms of evidence where the proper procedure were used in order to invoke a proper

outcome from the courts.

Post 1933 we have NO PUBLIC LAW RECOGNIZING UNALIENABLE RIGHTS for men and women. Infact there are no unalienable rights for ANY participants in the court system, because the court system ONLYhas as participants, TITLES OF NOBIILTY and FICTIONS. Titles of Nobility and FICTIONS do NOT haveunalienable rights so the court system does NOT have to grant unalienable rights to anyone thats a participant inthe court system. Jack Smith.

18 CONTRACTUAL CONSENT [018]

The courts are run on COMMERCIAL CONTRACT LAW and that is has NOTHING to do with any IN-LAWprocedures whatsoever. So the nature of the game is to OBTAIN a CONTRACT with your

OPPONENT (Adversary) so that the court can acknowledge and RATIFY the contract and SETTLE andCLOSE the case and move on and if you understand that EVERYTHING in there is happening by way ofCONTRACTS instead of trying to get the truth out then MAYBE youll get the truth to prevail by followingthe CORRECT procedure to get them to acknowledge the truth by CONTRACTUAL CONSENT.JackSmith.

19 BOTH JURISDICTIONAL VENUES [019]

Now the New Testament said thatYOU are to go to your brother to reach a SETTLEMENT and if he willNOT reach a settlement, then you GO WITH A WITNESS. Well when you go to your brother youre doingyourPRIVATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS by way ofLETTER ROGATORY and requests, AffidavitsofNEGATIVE AVERMENT and other forms ofTHIRD PARTY EVIDENCE that is brought into theproceedings. Most likely your brother will NOT answer you and in this case your brother is the

administrative agency or whatever it is that youre dealing with. If he does NOT answer you, you go to step 2,you take a WITNESS being the PUBLIC NOTARY. Why is he the witness? BECAUSE HE CAN BE SEENBY BOTH JURISDICTIONAL VENUES! He has a SEAL which is recognized in THEIR system and he hasalso been authorized in his capacity as a Notary to take sworn testimony and other evidence UNDER SEALasan EVIDENTIARY RECORD for the agency to review for acceptance and acknowledgement. Jack Smith.

20 YOU PROPOSE THE CONTRACT[020]

Now the way that you get yourREMEDY then isYOU PROPOSE the CONTRACT to your opponent bythese ADMINISTRATIVE PRIVATE PROCEDURES in which you are dealing with SUBSTANCE of amatter with ACTUAL evidence and youre dealing with the FORM of the matter in Admiralty/Maritime and



5/39

NOT the common law because Admiralty/Maritime is the proper administrative procedures for resolving theseissues until you EXHAUST your administrative remedy, you have NO CAPACITY for any judicial review ofany kind whatsoever. Now the ADMINSTRATIVE REMEDIES are actually CARRIED OUT IN PRIVATE,private letter negotiations back and forth between the parties. Jack Smith

21 YOU SET JURISDICTION & VENUE[021]

So government agencies MOST of the time carry on PRIVATE NEGOTIATIONS in order to ILLICIT A

CONTRACT fromYOU PRIOR to going into any public proceedings. All you have to do is MIRROR-IMAGE THAT! If a govt agency writes your strawman a letter, thats a PRIVATE LETTER OFNEGOTIATION forCONTRACT SETTLEMENT, its NOTpublic. In fact their documents which arelodged in their public records system are immune from dissemination TO the public by the PRIVACY ACT andother statutes. If you DONT PROPOSE YOUR private CONTRACT as a measure of last resort the publicwill PROPOSE a contract toYOU! And the Contract will be purviewed under public policy, which isENTIRELY different to public Law or Unalienable rights and Natural-Law. THE PARTY PROPOSING THECONTRACT CAN ACTUALLY SET THE JURISDICTION AND VENUE and the issues raisedJackSmith.

22 DUTIES OF CLERKS [022]- CRITICAL ONE!

The Statutes (In Florida) on the DUTIES OF CLERKS (of the court) CLEARLY stated that the clerk had tohave BOTH a PUBLIC FOLDER or a FILE FOLDER and a EVIDENCE FILE orFOLDER for the case(Public Policy folder & Private Folder). You must ask a QUESTION to the clerk and NOT make a statement,for example you would ask the clerk which you ALWAYS DO if you are the creditor,Are you meaning to tell me/us that you are operating your office in violation of the States Statutes, which

REQUIRE YOU to have an EVIDENCE FILE for each case ALSO?(As well as a Folder)Now since this is a question,, the party asking this question is coming from a POSITION OF AUTHORITY,not from the position ofDUTY. If you PROPOSE it you MUST PROVE IT if you question it, they MUSTrespond to you otherwise they are WAIVING certain defenses and rights.Jack Smith.

We would have to have some similiar "legislation" here in regards to a "Private folder" and/or Private folder"

23 COURTS PUBLIC OFFERING [023]

So EVERYTHING going on in the court is CONTRACT LAW and they have a fantastic ability to play theselittle games so that basically you will acknowledge theirPUBLIC OFFERING by PRIVATE ACCEPTANCEthrough the games they play with you and you dont know how to negotiate CONTRACTS and you dont knowany different.

THEIR offer in PUBLIC SESSION cannot look at the SUBSTANCE, the REALITY and the TRUTH ofYOUR RECORD in that PUBLIC session .[Only in the private -"In-Chambers"] Jack Smith.

24 BASED ON A SIGNATURE [024]

Everything is done by CONTRACT. It DOESNT matter whether its Civil or Criminal. There is NO LAWanymore because there is NO MONEY (Of substance) and since there is NO LAW and since there is NO

MONEY everything is done by CONTRACT, its AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES. So remember, thattheoretically anything that is done COMMERCIALLY in the CIVIL WORLD by any kind of accounts, itsBASED ON A SIGNATURE.Jack Smith.

25 THE ALTER-EGO - YOUR SHADOW [025]

The guy who THINKS he is an EMPLOYEE is NOT, its a CORPORATE FICTION, which is theEmployee. NO living MAN OR WOMAN went to work in their system. The ALTER-EGO THESHADOW (Called the Employee) went to work in their system. So they DO NOT see living men or womenand they are not employing living men and women they are employing CORPORATIONS calledEMPLOYEES. Jack Smith.



6/39

26 ONE-MAN LEGAL ENTITIES [026]

The INCOME TAX act is totally constitutional as it applies to Corporations; its totally UN-Constitutional as itapplies to LIVING men and women because living men and women have UN-A-LIEN-ABLE rights to theirLabour but corporations are operating under a government licence and the Income tax on the receipts of thecorporation basically is NOT A direct tax like on property, it is a tax on the way of doing business through the

PRIVILEGE of being an incorporated ENTITY.

In other words the government CREATED YOU as a LEGAL ENTITY and the government has a RIGHT totax its creation in any way shape and form it wants. The government CANNOT tax people because thegovernment did NOT create people, God created people but the government when it creates a corporation cantax its own corporate entities into oblivion. So therefore NOMAN orWOMAN EVER worked for anycorporation in the modern times, all that WORKS for the corporations are ONE-MAN LEGAL ENTITIES,FICTION-STRAWMEN.Jack Smith.

27 PRIVATE OFFER with PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE [027]

No matter what you do its important that you DONT do a General appearance (in court) because once youdo a General AppearanceYOU and the DEFENDANT (fiction) are the SAME and youre in the public areaUNDER the PUBLIC OFFERING.RememberTHE CHARGE IS A PUBLIC OFFERING and once you APPEAR to answer that public offeringin the public- YOU ARE IN PRIVATE ACCEPTANCE of a PUBLIC CONTRACT and I am TELLING

YOU yourONLY REMEDY is to get a PRIVATE OFFER with PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE to get you yourremedy.A Public offer with private acceptance will get you BOAT LOADS of problems because youre UNDERPUBLIC POLICY. Understand it this way, if you have a PRIVATE OFFERING with PUBLICACCEPTANCE you will get a PRIVATE EXECUTION. If you have a PUBLIC OFFERING with PRIVATEACCEPTANCE you are STUCK with a PUBLIC EXECUTION, which youre NOT going to appreciate. Jack Smith.

28 JURY SERVICE [028]

"If you DON'T want to serve on THE JURY you have to have a reason why. Now you walk in and they alwaysswear you in. Now if you walk in there and say, " I am Hebrew and I practice the law of God and I cannottake the Oath so I cannot SWEAR that I will accept THE LAW from you Judge"

You see to SERVE on a Jury you have to VIOLATE the ten commandments. You can't serve on a Jury andpractice the ten commandments. So once you AGREE to divorce yourself from the ten commandments and thatyou will ACCEPT THE LAW that the Judge gives you and that you'll follow the courts instructions ( Juryinstructions). The Judge will INSTRUCT you as to how the verdict will come out, then you can serve on theJury" -George Gordon."Can I be compelled to violate the HIGHER LAW of the creator in order to take an Oath, which I amNOT allowed to do as it is in violation of the HIGHER LAW"

29 INCOME TAX [029] TAXATION

When it comes to INCOME TAX its not really an income tax so much that its a TRUSTEE FEE based onthe fact that all these CORPORATIONS are Subsets of the government. The government is the FIDUCIARYand basically the Income Tax is the TRUSTEE FEE for the government regulating the corporations. SinceINCOME TAX is NOT levied on living men and women, there is NO constitutional limitation liability or TortWhatsoever. Taxes are ONLY levied on CORPORATE ENTITIES and to the extent that LIVING PEOPLEget tied up in this mess based on theirIGNORANCE! Jack Smith.

30 YOUR SETOFF REQUEST [030] EXEMPTION A/C



7/39

In 1933 by PUBLIC POLICY the government took away LAWFUL MONEY. By taking away Lawful moneyit took away the UNALIENABLIE RIGHTS of living men and women to POSSESS TITLE to any goods orproperty of any kind whatsoever.

Since it took away the unalienable right to have Money so that you can SECURE Titles, the governmenteither created a MASSIVE TORT against all living men and women which is Treason and a violation ofunalienable rights OR else the government gave them a REMEDY that would make them totally whole whichwould NOTprejudice them in anyway shape and form in dealing with property.

So the government said, Were going to take away your money so therefore you dont need any money BUTyou can go along with the ILLUSION that exists ,and weve got a PRE-PAID account when we make any kindof demands on you, just request through the PROPER parties that they APPLY a setoff, then youre NOTdamaged because if yourSETOFF is the EQUIVALENT to lawful money so that you get TITLE andCONTROL then you have NO claim against us we have no Tort against you. So just realize that you are PRE-PAID on EVERYTHING that they might demand that you do as long as you go through the proper procedurefor requesting the setoff. Jack Smith.

31 THE BEST ANSWER[031]

When we get to the SIGNATURE thing, what were going to end up doing is LOOKING IN THEMIRROR and the clad solution being corded administratively can be the best possible thing going that maybe theirCONFESSION. Its one of the BEST indicators we have got. In other words when we really are on topof the thing, on the issue or whatever the area may be and all of a sudden THINGS GO SILENT on THEIR

SIDE then that can be the BEST CONFIRMATION going that we are intellectually and procedurally exactlywhere we NEEDTO BE. TheirSILENCE can be the BEST ANSWER! Harmon Taylor"Silence is their AGREEMENT!".

32 LAW & IGNORANCE [032] COURT

The law only discriminates against those who are IGNORANT of the law - Lawyer"Education is expensive, but IGNORANCE is far more expensive"

33 AUDIT THE SETOFF [033] EXEMPTION A/C

So what did it cost the living man to pay the taxes? SIGNATURE, AUTHORITY, PERMISSION and thetaxes are SETOFFbut the Internal Revenue Services (ATO) was going a RETURN was filed with a voucher(1099 form) for setoff so the TRUSTEE FEES are paid and because the returns are filed they are asking us toAUDIT THE SETOFF on the Mortgage. Can they observe the audit on the Mortgage and approve it. If theyACCEPT the taxes arent they verifying that the Mortgage was paid? So basically what youre doing is getting a

SECOND WITNESS to the commercial transaction and Scripture says if you havent got a second witness,YOU AINT GOT NOTHING! Jack Smith

34 RELINQUISH YOUR RIGHTS [034]

Who here today VALUES property rights the most?

THE ONE WHO HAS CONTROL OVER IT must value the property MORE than anyone else because

CONTROL is just about everything and who has control of everything? THE STATE!

You people have ALL the unalienable rights to property BUT you gave them up to people who have MOREKNOWLEDGE to whats going on by VOLUNTARY CONTRACT and so YOU AINT GOT THEM NOMORE! Because you can VOLUNTARILY RELINQUISH your rights BY CONTRACT. Jack Smith.

35 AGREEMENT BY CONTRACT [035]

The CONCEPT is though that you have to get an AGREEMENT BY CONTRACT and you KNOW thatthey are NOT going to respond. So the way that you are going to get your contract is THROUGH the publicNotary through that process of showing an administrative procedure to the proper parties and theirFAILURE



8/39

to respond and then you are going to have to lodge the final result the evidence of that contract with thePROPERparty With PETITION on the PRIVATE SIDE to get the acknowledgement. Jack Smith.

How do you do these CONTRACTS and stay in CONTROL? You have to understand the PROTOCOLSbecause the protocols are SYMBOLIC of who you are willing to become in the relationship and if you dontunderstand that the protocols are symbolic of the CONTRACT that you are negotiating and then you can sayone thing and then do the opposite by your protocols. Your protocols are presumed to be YOUR ACTIONS,

they speakLOUDERthan your words and if you are contravening your own words and so your actions put youin a disadvantage from the contract and into the public and just like the Judge says, All your unalienable rightsare now CONTRACTED AWAY and they are now in the hands of those that VALUE them the most. Whovalues them the most? Those that UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY ARE and how you maintain them. Evidentlyyou didnt learn how to maintain and negotiate and maintain those rights! Jack Smith.

The problem is that you go to the PUBLIC FOOL SYSTEM and theyre NOT about training you onCONTRACTS on the PRIVATE SIDE, theyre about getting you to ACCEPT PUBLIC OFFERINGS so thatthe schools of the corporations are in CONTROL. Jack Smith.

36 RESIDENT- INHABITANT [036] * * * * * * TAXATION

The term RESIDE technically moves you off the Land. A RESIDENT in INTERNATIONAL LAW is aPERSON in a country NOT his own and INHABITANTS are the same thing, its all deceptive.L.B Bork.

37 DE-FACTO CITIZENSHIP [037] CONTRACT

There is NO state citizenship right now. The only citizenship there is right now is DEFACTO. ACITIZENSHIP is a term that applies to POLITICAL RIGHTS because there are NO governments for us toparticipate in unless you want to be [1] An INSURGENT and you can be part of your state government orFederal, what ever the case may be or be a REBEL and vote for the Insurgent (Defacto Govt). There is NO state

citizenship unless you want to participate (Vote) in an insurgent system L.B. BorkPlease note, that by "Participation" in "Voting", you are deemed to be in REBELLION to the original,lawful and dejure jurisdiction and therefore also an "Insurgent" by "force of law". So that you are

compelled to violate the creators law in order to participate in an "ungodly system". I think it's time to

tender your; "NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF CONSENT" - to participate in a system that is in

rebellion to the original and lawful, dejure government/jurisdiction. This is my official notice and

DECREE as it is my right to exercise responsibility.

38 THE ACT OF EMERGENCY [038]

This Quote is in regards to the continued state of emergency that we have been under since early last

century.

What they did in their minds was an act of emergency or cause for emergency and really it wasnt it was

actually USURPATION to put this EXTENDED COMMERCIAL SYSTEM in place and pull people into thejurisdiction of the Federal government to have them CONTROLLEDby legislation where the Federalgovernment could NOT CONTROL them before and to give Corporations power. L.B Bork

39 AFFIDAVIT SPEAKS FOR ITSELF [039]

I wont stand there ( in court) and argue, I let MY AFFIDAVITS speak for itself and if I try and ADD TO ITand START TALKING now all of a sudden I am Testifying and I am NOT interested in Testifying. MYAFFIDAVITS SPEAKS for itself, it is what it is, has ANYBODY COME FORWARD to REBUT myAFFIDAVIT? And THATS where I stay and I am a BROKEN RECORD and I DONT go any further than



9/39

the Defect (In the charging instrument being the Plaintiff, who is it? And the Defendant? Who is it?) SamDavis.

Brian, W. - this one is especially for you! Please take note where Sam Davis says that he becomes a

BROKEN RECORD! And does NOT STRAY. when you start "discussing' your case you are now

"ADDING TO IT" and are testifying. - This one is a CRITICAL one to understand when proceeding with

a private administrative process and your affidavit in a court or tribunal.

40 REBUTAL TO MY AFFIDAVIT [040] COURT

In reality, and it may APPEAR to you that, theyre (the magistrate/judge) is moving forward and that theyDONT care what you say and theyre moving forward and by golly if you dont come along andPARTICIPATE in this trial (hearing) then youre going to be washed down the river so to speak. Well that isreally NOT THE CASE, they can pretend like theyre going on, they can go on, in fact they can hold theirentire trial (hearing) and if they look at me and want a response from me, I am merely going to ask,IS ANY OF THAT A RESPONSE OR REBUTTAL TO MY AFFIDAVIT? Let them go wherever they want.Sam DavisJust like Sam Davis says, you must be like a Broken Record and NOT TESTIFY and "add to it" (Your

Affidavit).

41 CHANGE YOUR RELIGION [041]

CITIZENSHIP - YOUR NEW RELIGION AND CHURCH.CITIZENSHIP is one of these terms we need to be EXTRAORDINARILY aware of. Its part of theGOTCHA system and its part of the language thats convoluted and its one that we need to be FULLYaware of. If were talking about a U.S Citizen, were NO LONGER talking about a LAW OF THE LANDbased system but a very DIFFERENT thing. It is one more item on the area that we look back on and sit downand now say, oh my God what happened? Its a LOOK ALIKE but its VERY, VERY different HarmonTaylor [Former Bar Attorney]

I used to think that a U.S citizen was the right thing to be and have since OPTED OUT of participation INTHAT CHURCH, the CHURCH of the UNITED STATES (Inc), membership of the church of the UnitedStates is its UNITED STATES citizens and THATS NOT MY CHURCH!Harmon Taylor [Former

Bar Attorney]Citizenship is to be DISTINGUISHED from another concept called NATIONALITY. Nationality isdetermined as a matter of law. There are two theories, one is JUS SOLI which is a Nationality DERIVED fromthe location of the birth (BERTH), its the ASSOCIATION with a BODY POLITIC it determined by thelocation of that body politic at the time that the child was born and the child has a nationality according to thatrule, its a British Rule and we adopted it. The other rule is JUS-SANGUANESS which basically, youre anational of the BLOODLINE or in other words a national of the nationality of your parents. Harmon Taylor[Former Bar Attorney]

Citizenship is a CRITICAL understanding; I equate that with CHURCH MEMBERSHIP. Why? BecauseCitizenship is PURELY DISCRETIONARY unilateral voluntary decision. So I can change my RELIGION I canchange my citizenship. Harmon Taylor [Former Bar Attorney]

42 CHOICE OF LAW [042]

For example in the LAND issue we have got to understand what are the details by which we choose the wronglaw. There are things like TIME, PLACE, CAPACITY, MEDIUM OF EXCHANGE then PROPERTYDESCRIPTION all of which can indicate that we want all of these transactions and all of these PROPERTYINTERESTS to be recognized in the CONSTITUTION FREE MARTIME COMMERCIAL ZONE. If weDONT understand the differences then that is the path we will be lead down (The Maritime Commercial Zonein which the constitution does NOT apply.) When we DO understand that TIME MATTERS and that TIME isevidence ofCHOICE OF LAW. We need to make sure that that piece of paper [contract] says WHAT WEwant it to say BEFORE we sign it. Harmon Taylor [Former Bar Attorney



10/39

43 FUNDAMENTAL CHOICES [043]

The two fundamental choices right is the FUNNY MONEY SYSTEM which exists in the CONSTITUTIONFREE MARITIME COMMERCIAL ZONE (Federal Reserve notes) under the law of the land that system isFRAUD on its face. When you choose to use Federal Reserve notes there must be anotherCHOICE OF LAWin which that funny money is fully legitimate. When we use these Federal Reserve Notes then if we say

NOTHING MORE then it can be presumed, safely that (YOUR) CHOICE OF LAW is NOT the LAW OF

THE LAND but the MARTIME law that goes along with this other Place. So if we want the Law of theLand to be presumed we need to use an HONEST system of weights and measures. The minute weESTABLISH the Choice of law then everything else is different. So evidence of (Your) choice of law youuse SILVER and denominate it in terms ofTROY OUNCES. Harmon Taylor [Former Bar Attorney]

45 NOTICE OF LIEN [045]

Here is some very practical and worthwhile knowledge to keep in your notes! - Pierino.

Well basically a NOTICE OF LIEN is NOT worth the paper that it is written on. It is a statement that youowe this amount of money. There is NO DUE PROCESS, you havent had your day in court, theres NOJUDGMENTby a court ofCOMPETENT JURISDICTION and so basically its imbalanced. Now if thecounty recorder would take a moment and do theirDUE DILIGENCE and I want to point this out thatIGNORANCE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THE LAW and thats where we are holding theirFEET TO THE FIREand because they have not done theirDUE DILIGENCE and the document is STAMPED and turns it into aNEGOTIABLE SECURITY thats where theFRAUD BEGINS and its NOT just to the RECORDING of theNOTICE OF LIEN or into the tax Lien Index, ITS THE STAMPING, thats what makes the NOTICE OFLIEN a NEGOTIABLE SECURITY. With the county recorder now being the Fiduciary (for that instrument)she is making it something that ITS NOT.

If it was an ACTUAL lien you would have had yourDUE PROCESS and you would have had your Judgementby a court of competent jurisdiction. It would be SPECIFIC and CONCISE. You would have had your say.You must stick to the DUE PROCESS ISSUE. And NOT allow them to pull the smoke and mirrors becausethis all boils down to DUE PROCESS. You see when this NOTICE OF LIEN is presented to the recordersoffice it does NOT contain a SWORN AFFIDAVIT assessment and signed in FRONT of the recorder in frontof the NOTARY as being TRUE,CORRECT and COMPLETE. THAT IS THE NECESSARYCERTIFICATION therefore its ONLY a NON-Negotiable, non-spendable piece of paper or instrument whichmeans that it CANNOT be used in commerce as MONEY, after maturing unchallenged after 90 days to procureand sell property. You dont have an actual place that you can go and REVIEW the ACTUAL lien andREFUTE it. So they are a FRAUDULENT SECURITYbecause they are COUNTERFEITED into anEvidence of Debt, theyre numbered, theyre recorded and theyre used in COMMERCE to levy.RaeCopitka Lighting the Fires of Liberty

46 ALSO WAGES LEVY [046]

On a WAGES LEVY The same applies, its a SECURITIES FRAUD. The EMPLOYER is committing aSECURITIES FRAUD if they LEVY that they received from the IRS/ATO is NOT PERFECTED. Its has tohave a HAND SIGNED AFFIDAVIT being True, correct and complete Signed in front of a NOTARY. RaeCopitka Lighting the Fires of Liberty.

[This information is in addition to item [045] - NOTICE OF LIEN information. Worthwhile and practicalknowledge to keep in your notes. This is when someone is having their wages GARNISHED. If you

understand what they need to present up front under DUE PROCESS OF LAW it will help to empower

you]

47 BIRTH CERTIFICATE UNDERWRITES LOANS [047] EXEMPTION A/C

"KNOWLEDGE WILL FOREVER GOVERN IGNORANCE"- James Madison

Doesnt the SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERtie into the BIRTH CERTIFICATE? Ok so when the BankSETS UP the account for the MORTGAGE LOAN, whats FINANCING (Backing it) it? THE BIRTHCERTIFICATE VALUE! Its NOT created out ofNOTHING. They are using the Birth Certificate and why



11/39

are they using the Birth Certificate. Well YOU authorized it and they HOLD it and you never did anything toget it back. So theyre using it on the public side with yourPRIVATE AUTHORITY. So YOU created a purePROMISE TO PAY and they then go, Lets check this guy out and they find, Oh yeah hes part of theTONTINE SYSTEM and hes got a Birth Certificate REGISTERED with us which has VALUE. So we willallow for the bank to give him the VALUE that hes requesting BASED on the fact that were HOLDING THEVALUE thats in his Birth Certificate to UNDERWRITE it. Whats the difference between the bank allowingyou to BORROW money on a promissory note versus us coming back and CONTROLLING the Birth

Certificate, Bonding the Birth Certificate as a guarantee and then requesting they SHIFT accounting ledgerbalances into the public based on the VALUE of the Birth Certificate to SETOFF and CLOSE the PUBLICaccount. The difference in the first scenario in the bank mortgage is that WE AUTHORIZE the government tobe the LEGAL TRUSTEE with the authority to issue the yah or nay with respect to the Loan. Once wehave ACCEPTED the Birth Certificate, RETURNED it, SETOFF and closed it, WE have the LEGALauthority to give the authority for the SETOFF because now we have INVERTED the picture again JackSmith.

Lorraines Question: Do we have to do CHARGEBACK THEN?Claudes Answer: Yes indeed - but you can also do it in more than one way. eg. You can do it while inprivate administrative process in a case.

48 PURPOSE OF DIB HEARING [048]

The PURPOSE of the DATA INTEGRITY BOARD review meeting is NOT for the purpose of reviewing theINTEGRITY of the paperwork because that has already been decided, it is for the PURPOSE of determiningthe CHARACTER & STANDING ofTHE MAN/WOMAN who brought the perfect paperwork and wasintending to use the perfect paperwork forCOMMERCIAL settlement and closure. So they have to find out ifthe STATUS and CHARACTER of the party who is going to use the paperwork was going to be ALLOWEDto use it. Jack Smith

49 PERMISSION TO BE A DEBTOR [049]

In raising your right hand and taking an OATH, what has just happened? You swore an oath and WHAT didthat just do? The easiest way to put this is that you have just AUTHORIZED for them to be the creditors OVERthe authority to do whatever they want to have done on that property. Remember that NO PUBLIC OFFICEdoes anything except by PERMISSION of the people. So HOW didRAISING MY HAND to swear an oath

just end up GIVING the City, county, State, Federal Government authority over what was going to be approvedorNOT approved on that property? I GAVE PERMISSION BY BEING THE DEBTOR or the TAIL insteadof the HEAD. Now what is very interesting is that part of the procedure is that they will allow ANYONE thatsin the neighborhood or anyone to come in and object but they NEVER swear these people in. What are youcombating in terms of a LOGICAL ARGUMENT? Just HEARSAY but because you AGREED to be thedebtor and LOSER, hearsay is sufficient in terms of a logical argument in terms of anything you do So let thegames in DISNEYLAND begin and remember that is all PROCEDURE, with your permission of course! Jack Smith.

50 YOUR JURIDICIAL PERSONALITY [050]

You have signed as SURETY for the HYPOTHECATION to create the money through the Federal ReserveBank. Now heres how they get JURISDICTION. In the Federal courts it says that; Jurisdiction EXTENDS toVESSELS ofWHATEVER KIND recognized as instrumentalities of navigation in MARITIME COMMERCE.In ADMIRALTY the vessel has a JURIDICIAL PERSONALITY an ALMOST Corporate Capacity having notonly RIGHTS but LIABILITIES, sometimes distinct from those of the owner which may be ENFORCED byprocess and DECREE against the vessel BINDING up all the interested in her and inclusive upon the world, forAdmiralty in appropriate cases administers remedies IN REM, i.e. Against the Property as well as remedies IN-PERSONAM i.e. Against the party personally.

Where THEY GET YOU, is that you have DECLARED YOURSELF, unknowingly to be a VESSEL (of theUnited States/Australia) because it says a VESSEL ofWHATEVER kind. Bill the Freeholder



12/39

51 STATUTES AT LARGE [051]

The STATUTES AT LARGE is the instrument that they use to CREATE PUBLIC VESSELS out ofALL ofus. A PUBLIC VESSEL can be better categorized as CHATTEL property. Bill the Freeholder

52 WARD OF THE COURT [052]

You see the minute that you go out and HIRE a Lawyer; you have just waived your right to challenge(Jurisdiction) because the lawyer that you hired is an OFFICER of the court. So the minute that you hired himyou ACQUIESCED to the jurisdiction because hes PART of that jurisdiction. Were all taught from a youngage to go out and hire a lawyer and the minute you do that, you just WAIVED ALL your rights under theconstitution/Common law and you have ACCEPTED the jurisdiction of that court and you CANT stand up andspeak for yourself because you have ALSObecome a WARD OF THE COURT and you have made astatement that youre a Person ofUNSOUND MIND and thats how you become a ward of the court and theguy taking care of you , your lawyer becomesYOUR GUARDIAN. Remember that these guys are MAGIC atgetting you to acquiesce to the jurisdiction unless you are EXTREMELY knowledgeable in whats going on Bill the Freeholder

52.1 WARD OF THE COURT [052]Cautionary Note To The Below Information In Previous Email [Ward Of The Court - 052]The information described below does NOT mean that one does NOT require assistance of counsel - in thecurrent admiralty/maritime system, one needs to be "buffered" by legal counsel OTHERWISE your remedy[private administrative paperwork] gets pushed into the "public" side of the matter and you are then deemed tobe one and the same entity as the Strawman entity named in the presentments and you will lose your remedy asthe Strawman entity has no unlienable rights, only benefits and priveleges.The real issue [for clarification purposes] is that you do NOT get your legal counsel to ARGUE [which creates adishonour] n your behalf and then makes the "law of the case" public policy instead of the "real law".What one needs to do is acquire a legal counsel [preferably by way of your exemption/prepaid account - this canbe done through legal services commission in Australia - in America one who is "accused" isAUTOMATICALLY given a lawyer]. Without the assistance of legal counsel one has NOT had what theAustralian Constitution refers to "the right to a fair trial/hearing" [see Dietrich v The Queen 1992].Legal Services Commission will TEST YOU on two issues - 1. Your financial position - an "Affidavit of

Impercuniosity" [without money] will take care of that issue - here the legal services commission are luring youinto "testifying" that you have "income" and "assets" and it is not advisable to proceed on that basis.2. Legal Services Commission will then look at "the merits of the case" i.e.whether or not you are arguing [which is a dishonour] or whether or not you are "going to peace" [settling andclosing the matter honourably by exhausting your private administrative process.] If you are ARGUING , thisthen gives Legal Services Commission the "discretion" as to whether or not they provide you with legal counsel.If you are arguing of course the "law of the case" becomes "public policy" and this is what gives Legal ServicesCommission the "right" to deny you assistance of legal counsel.There may be some toing and froing [drafting and redrafting] which needs to take place before Legal ServicesCommission finally give up and give you that legal counsel [which is a right under the Australian Constitutionand a right according to the law because without that legal counsel, if you are "the accused", you cannot get aremedy as you cannot then get your evidence [stipulation/agreement obtained through private administrative

process into the proceedings i.e. through private in Chambers review]YOU DO NOT FILE ANYTHING INTO THE PUBLIC.

Once you have finally obtained legal counsel, then you must draft aninstruction letter outlining what it is that you want and do notwant that legal counsel to do for you eg do NOT argue any of the facts, represent the undersigned only on theprivate side of these matters, the undersigned does NOT wish to argue nor have any other party argue on behalfof the undersigned etc etc etcOnce you complete your private administrative process you then submit your paperwork to your legal counsel tohave him/her submit that into the private evidence folder [private in chambers ministerial review] and you writeup a one or two page list seeking the orders that you wish that legal counsel to draw up based upon the outcome



13/39

of the review of your submitted evidence - be certain to give a copy of that evidence to all other partiesconcerned and to the judge/magistrate - this locks the legal counsel into a position whereby he/she cannotdestroy your remedy.By default a lawyer who is HIRED by way of toilet paper notes [FRNS and RESERVE BANK NOTES - DebtLiability Instruments] will AUTOMATICALLY go to the public side of the issues and place you immediatelyinto dishonour if you do not quickly and clearly instruct them on the proper and honoruable manner in whichyou wish for them to proceed [that is not to argue of course but to merely submit your evidence and draw up the

orders sought based upon the outcome of the review of your private administrative paperwork which of coursetakes place "in chambers" and not in the public!]This is because A LAWYER/ATTORNEY MAKES MORE MONEY IF HE/SHE CAN NOT ONLY CREATEA CONTROVERSY BUT EXTEND THAT CONTROVERSY FOR AS LONG AS POSSIBLE SUCH AS ISNOW STANDARD PRACTICE IN THE FAMILY COURTS OF THE WORLD.As they say, ignorance of the law is no excuse so if you do not know who you are and do not know that you haveto instruct your lawyer as your fiduciary to assist you to honourably settle and close the matter WITHOUTARGUMENTS, then it is true that the legal system is not corrupt per se, but that "my people perish for a lack ofknowledge". Regards, Claude Memma

53 DO NOT TRAVERSE TO THEIR ISSUE [053] COURT

When you bring your own issues before the court, THAT is OUTSIDE of the issue being brought against you,

as long asYOU DONT TRAVERSE to that (THEIR) issue and you bring your own issues up, now YOUREthe plaintiff and your issue has to be decided BEFORE the other issues are. They will try and get you toTRAVERSE ( to other issues) all the time. What you have to do is go in and create your own ISSUE. Forexample that they charge you forXYZ statutory provisions, but youre NOT going to discuss XYZ statutoryprovisions. The issue must be kept with yourRECORDS at all times So you MUST NOT TRAVERSE ontotheir issue Where THEIR MAGIC comes in is that they get you to come in before the court and then the judgestarts asking you a BUNCH of questions and then the getsYOU to AGREE TO SOMETHING Bill theFreeholder

54 MISSING NEED TO CHASEUP FROM PIERINO

55 COLOUR OF LAW & MALFEASEANCE [055]

One of the COLOURS OF LAW is the COLOUR OF OFFICE and that refers to an act committed by aPUBLIC OFFICIAL under the APPEARANCE of authority but which EXCEEDS AUTHORITY. Its an actcommitted underCOLOUR OF OFFICE that is sometimes required to PROVE malfeasance in that office.We have LAW and then we have Colour of Law which is counterfeit. Thats why we have people like

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS because they can legally act under Colour of law where an official orOFFICER OF THE COURT should NOT, because they do it all the time. Rae Copitka [Lighting the Firesof Liberty]Please note that this demonstrates that there is a difference when the Public officer operates

under "Public policy" (colour of law) as opposed to an "In-chambers" determination made to uphold

your private rights. This lady also can't "see" the two sides of the court so we head back to 'their all

corrupt!". This has been posted to demonstrate what is a good explanation of "colour of law'. - Pierino.

COLOUR OF LAW is acting OUTSIDE of the LAW, using the law or legal authority asYOU CLOAK-Definition of Colour of Law Rae Copitka[Lighting the Fires of Liberty]

56 A NAME DEPICTS PROPERTY [056]

Every time we INTRODUCE ourselves, you know when they ask you at ALL public meetings, Please stateyour name and Address and we tell them: WE DONT HAVE A NAME a name depicts OWNERSHIP and were NOT owned by anyone. We are WHOWE ARE! And as far as an ADDRESS we dont have one of those either we live in our bodies so thatswherever we are.



14/39

That IMMEDIATELY puts them ON NOTICE that we know our stature, we know our place in Society and it isABOVE those who we are addressing and it is called POLITICALjurisdiction because everything you dealwith today in Society is the Corporation, you DO have a political status and you have to take on thePERSONAL jurisdiction in order to put yourselfABOVE the political because Political is what they GIVE

YOU in the Corporation.You have political, personal and subject matter jurisdiction and you HAVE TO take on the PERSONAL

jurisdiction in order to put yourselfABOVE the political. The first thing that they ask you in the courts is to

please state your name and address for the records. IF YOU DO, THEYVE GOT YOU! You haveACQUIESCED. So a NAME only applies to PROPERTY and if you want to bePROPERTY, you want to besomebodys property, somebodys SLAVE then you can give them your name but otherwise you JUST AREwho you are. Rae Copitka [Lighting the Fires of Liberty]

57 FRAUD WITH SCIENTER [057]

Here's a NEW WORD for your Vocabulary and for your paperwork(Not to accuse of course!) folks!The point we want to make here is that WE DONT want to sue them as a governmental entity. You dont winwhen you sue against the government so were looking at HOLDING them PERSONALLY LIABLE and theway to do that is once you have made a government official AWARE of a crime and they FAIL to act then theyare stripped of their governmental immunity and were giving them all the OPPORTUNITY and ALLTHE

ROPE that they need to hang themselves. Once you NOTIFY them of the FRAUD and they CONTINUE to doit, its called FRAUD WITH SCIENTERRae Copitka [Lighting the Fires of Liberty]http://www.answers.com/topic/scienter?cat=biz-fin Scienter

Previous knowledge of operative facts, frequently signifying guilty knowledge. As used in Pleadings, the

term signifies that the alleged crime orTort was done designedly or with guilty knowledge. The term is

usually employed in relation toFraud, and means a person's knowledge that he was making false

representations, with intent to deceive.

The term scienterrefers to a state of mind often required to hold a person legally accountable for her acts.

The term often is used interchangeably with mens rea, which describes criminalintent, but scienterhas a

broader application because it also describes knowledge required to assign liability in many civil cases.

UN NUMBERED BLOOD OF THE MESSIAH

The Messiah came to planet earth once. He did that to pay the debts of his people to SET THEM FREE,however even though he has PAID the DEBTS. It is interesting that they have not held an accounting hearinginvolving Gods people yet. In other words, all of Gods people that have lived in the past, in the present and inthe future, the LAWFUL money of account to SETTLE the debts of SIN EXISTS by the BLOOD OF THEMESSIAH and that money is sufficient to SETTLE & CLOSE all accounts of debt, but there has not been anaccounting that has been officially done.In Revelation it says there was be a massive ACCOUNTING in front of the throne where everyone comes at

the same time and everyone is going to go one by one in front of the accountant and they are going to PLEADtheir account as to why is should be SETOFF, settled and closed or whether there has NOT been a setoffOFFERING to settle the account.

Our Body is still a body that is MORTAL because it STILL has the attributes of SIN attached with it giving itmortality because regardless whether or not we have ACCEPTED the OFFER by our brother to use his lawfulmoney, his blood, as a setoff to setoff our account and CLOSE it, the accounting has NOT yet been held andUntil the accounting is held and the account is officially closed we CANNOT have an immortal body or aglorified body as the Messiah had AFTER his resurrection from the dead.

BIRTH REGISTRATIONS- THE TRICK!

This is THEIR little trick! You areNOT obliged to REGISTER your children. If you do it is at that point thatyou are CREATING A LEGAL ENTITY or a PERSON(Fiction). You are ASSOCIATING that PERSON withyour OFFSPRING, you are abandoning OWNERSHIP orTITLE to that PERSON and the government is

http://www.answers.com/topic/scienter?cat=biz-finhttp://www.answers.com/topic/scienter?cat=biz-finhttp://www.answers.com/topic/torthttp://www.answers.com/topic/torthttp://www.answers.com/topic/fraudhttp://www.answers.com/topic/fraudhttp://www.answers.com/topic/mens-reahttp://www.answers.com/topic/mens-reahttp://www.answers.com/topic/intenthttp://www.answers.com/topic/intenthttp://www.answers.com/topic/liabilityhttp://www.answers.com/topic/scienter?cat=biz-finhttp://www.answers.com/topic/torthttp://www.answers.com/topic/fraudhttp://www.answers.com/topic/mens-reahttp://www.answers.com/topic/intenthttp://www.answers.com/topic/liability


15/39

SEIZING that under the laws of MARITIME SALVAGE. It becomes THEIR CHATTEL PROPERTY and theyuse it as THEIR collateral to FLOAT LOANS or to FLOAT BONDS for LOANS." - Robert-Arthur: Menard

"Truth does not have to be believed for it to be true!"

TESTIMONY

Testimony = test the money Claude Memma

The Word MUST

I would like to point out the meaning of the word MUST. They will tell you that you MUST apply, youMUST register. They want you to think that you have an OBLIGATION to engage in a certain action. If youhad an obligation, they would use the word OBLIGE. The word MUST is very tricky, it has two senses,one is an ACTIVE and one is a PASSIVE. If I tell you, You MUST come to my party through the front doorAm I creating an obligation upon you to attend my party? Or am I defining that IF YOU CHOOSE tovoluntarily take them, it will grant me AUTHORITY OVER YOU. Thats THEIRword MUST. It createsNO OBLIGATION, it DEFINES the parameters that will GIVE THEM AUTHORITY and theyve goteveryone thinking its an obligation on OURpart and they then point to it and say well you entered into itvoluntarily.The word MUST It doesnt create an Obligation it defines the path, which IF YOU VOLUNTARILY take

it will TRANSFER AUTHORITY to another. Robert: Arthur- Menard

BIRTH REGISTRATIONS

So when a BIRTH is REGISTERED, its NOT the REGISTRATION of the FETUS, its the[REGISTRATION] of an EVENT and the name ENTERED ONTO the form is theNAME OF THE EVENTand it has NOTHING to do with the Fetus, contrary to what you are thinking in your mind.So the name that is ENTERED onto the statement of BIRTH is actually given to the government and the name

that I SPOKE to my child is the one that I gave to my child NOT the name that is on paper to the governmentVictor-Robert: Beck

APPLICATION - MEANS TO BEG!

This definition and understanding below is CRITICAL as this is what will apply in our everyday life as we fillout those dreaded "application" forms for whatever purpose. Keep this little GEM handy. - All the best, Pierino.Now THINK about this because if you REALLY want to understand what a word means, DONT just look up

the definition, you have to look at the ASSUMPTIONS it rests upon and the IMPLICATIONS that is created.APPLICATION means TO BEG! He who begs knows EXACTLY what they are begging for, they know exactlywhat theyre giving up for it and they are eitherACKNOWLEDGING that the AUTHORITY TO GRANTEXISTS or they are WILLING to create it BY TRANSFERENCE and finally its ALWAYS VOLUNTARY,you are never EVER OBLIGED TO BEG. Robert Arthur Menard

APPLICATION-REGISTRATION-SUBMISSION

These THREE words is how the government has been getting the authority OVERus, REGISTRATION,APPLICATION and SUBMISSION. All of the power that they have over YOU is because you have putYOUR signature on a document with one, two or three of these words. The word REGISTRATION, what does itmean? Oh I thought I was just putting my name down? Uh, uh, No, historically it goes back hundreds andhundreds of years to an act of a ships Captain, signing OVERhis ship and all Chattel contents to the harbourmaster for SAFE KEEPING. Chattel contents included the SLAVES, the condemned, those is DEBT andanything that could be a party to a contract.APPLICATION- means to BEG, to plead, petition, implore and requests. If you want to know what this wordis going to have on your life, you need to have MORE than just the definition. You need to look at theASSUMPTIONS that this definition rests upon and then you need to look at the implications created by The



16/39

Assumptions CREATED by BEGGING. He who BEGS, knows exactly what he is begging for, they knowexactly what theyre t willing to give up for it,they are ACKNOWLEDGING the authority to GRANT orif it doesnt exist theyre willing to create it through transference.

We TRANSFERthat AUTHORITY if that authority doesnt ALREADY exist when we APPLY and finallyBECAUSE you are a human being and no one is EVER obliged to beg, it is an ENTIRELY VOLUNTARYACTION. You canNEVERclaim, oh they made me APPLY. No-one has EVER made you apply foranything,

SUBMISSION is their OTHER tricky little definition. It means TO AGREE to BEND to anothers will or tolead to anothers discretion. If you are AGREEING to bend to someones will, you are IN CONTRACT withthem and again in order for it to be voluntarily and lawful it HAS to be voluntary. If you are agreeing to LEAVEsomething at someones discretion and in order for you to LEGALLY leave something, you must havepossession and OWNERSHIP of it. Again you are ABANDONING it and it is an ENTIRELY voluntary action.

They get ALL YOUR POWERwhen you PUT yourSIGNATURE which is EVIDENCE of a NOTE on adocument with the word REGISTRATION-APPLICATION-SUBMISSION.They do it with every thing. You want to register your kids? What are you going to do? Youre SUBMITTINGan APPLICATION forREGISTRATION. You want to register REAL property then you SUBMIT yourAPPLICATION for REGISTRATION, - EVERY TIME! Robert-Arthur:Menard. "Truth doesnot have to be believed for it to be true!"

EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTDo you have a right to YOUR labour? Yes, but the problem is under the EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT, it isNOT the (living) man or woman that is being employed, it is a CORPORATION (Evidenced by the ALLCAPITAL LETTER NAME) that is being EMPLOYED. A one PERSON individual CORPORATION and thetax is on the PRIVILEGE of the CORPORATION basically receiving an Admiralty "chose in action"ACCOUNTING slip for PAYMENT RATHER THAN an exchange of LABOUR for SUBSTANCE (lawfulmoney- silver or Gold coin) which the man or woman would have if they did it on a quid pro quo basis with aSUBSTANCE coin made of gold or silver which the public does not currently show exists under PUBLICPOLICY.Jack Smith

CHOOSE WISELY!

What is the TRICKthat they are doing here [Sending out charges/summons to the DEFENDANT, all capital

letter name] that is a TEST upon YOU to see how YOU are going to respond to this? If you JOIN into anargument YOU are the DEFENDANT/DEBTOR. Here is how SUBTLE the TRICKis. Who did they send theNOTICE to? THE DEBTOR/DEFENDANT! That is what it says in the notice, the all capital letter names onthe notices. They did NOT send the notice to the LIVING MAN/CREDITOR. His name WASNT on it, buthe got it.What is theirTRICKhere? In other words they sent it to the DEFENDANT. You see the DEFENDANT is a

CREATION, its a TRUST and as a TRUST, there are TWO SIDES to the Trust, there is theCONTROLLERand there is the OPERATORto that Trust. The OPERATORS are the OWNER/USERS andtheyre the debtors. The CONTROLLERS are the CREDITORS and they make the legal determination. Nowthe government THROWS the DEFENDANT out as the CALLING CARD as the attraction and theyNEVERthrow it out there and say, Were the government and were CONTROLLING this entity. They just

throw it out there to see what the other party is going to do. And if you start DEFENDING it, youre theOWNER/OPERATORof that entity, so you have CHOSEN UNWISELY to be the DEBTOR, which makesthe government automatically, be default, the CREDITOR.

When you RETURN ALL THE DOCUMENTATION forSETTLEMENT and CLOSURE and then useyour authority to SETTLE and CLOSE the CHARGES, youre acting like the CONTROLLER, which makesthe government the OWNER/OPERATORand DEBTOR. They always take what it is that YOU dontperform BY DEFAULT. Jack Smith.



17/39

DON'T REJECT THE ACCOUNT!

The ISSUE isnt did you create an account for that fiction or that illusion thats NOT the issue! Because theFICTION is in THEIR SYSTEM, let them CREATE any accounts they want.The POINT is HOW are you going to drag me into yourILLUSION and how are you going to BIND me intoSERVITUDE when YOU DENIED ME THE SUBSTANCE of GOLD AND SILVERto SETTLE accounts sothat I CAN BE FREE? You took away all of my remedy, which means you have DAMAGED me UNLESS youhave given me something to REPLACE THAT. [That is your PRE-PAID, Social Security Trust account of

course!]What did they give? They GAVE you an insurance policy to PRE-PAY all of YOUR ACCOUNTS but DONTREJECT THE ACCOUNT but ASKforSETTLEMENT based upon the accounting method.- Jack Smith.

COMMERCIAL ACCEPTANCE

This one makes for a GREAT STIPULATION!Remember when there is ANY documentation which is used OUTSIDE OF YOUR JURISDICTION or

domain it needs to have been WITNESSED in BOTH VENUES and BOTH JURISDICTIONS or domains.So when your signature APPEARS on your documentation, that signature is coming from the LIVING SOULin the original jurisdiction and venue. You have tendered it to the OFFICIAL in the county which is aMILITARY OVER-RUN jurisdictional government and that county official as a FOREIGNER, when theyCERTIFY the document they are basically ACKNOWLEDGINGFOREIGN AMBASSADORadversarys

paperwork.If the OFFICIAL has NOT ISSUED PROTEST that they DONT want you there, they have TACITLYACCEPTED YOU as a FOREIGNERand when they have placed their signatures and SEALS on yourpaperwork that is a COMMERCIAL ACCEPTANCE and they have ACKNOWLEDGED YOU being thereand if they have ACCEPTED YOU then they have responded to your presentation of paperwork in anHONOURABLE manner.ONE ALWAYS ACCEPTS TENDER OFFERS unless youre going to PROTEST or go into WARFARE.

When you present your documents as an OFFERyou are going into the FOREIGN GOVERNMENT acting in aHUMBLE CAPACITY asking I am here as an ambassador, will you allow me to be present? So what theyare doing by the way they are doing this that THEIR ACTIONS ARE SPEAKING LOUDERthan theirwords.- Jack Smith.

CONVERSION OF LIABILITY

The primary benefit of the PRIVATE ADMINSTRATIVE PROCESS to which I will refer to as the ForeignAdvisory and the primary benefit of that initial Bond is that it serves as a VEHICLE to CONVERT THELIABILITY. They came at YOU with a HOLLOW charge, that was not charged up so to speak, it had NOCOMMERCIAL ENERGY and you CHARGED IT UP, by the way that is WHY you do the ACCEPTANCEFOR VALUE and return it to them. You return it to TREASURY with your INDEMNITY BOND or yourOFFSET BOND, saying that it is ACCEPTED BY THE DRAWEE and that you wish to make a DEPOSIT tothe TREASURY with a CHARGE to be made to that vendors account. So now you have given itCOMMERCIAL ENERGY and you also paid it with the indemnity bond. It is now also serving as aCONVERSION OF LIABILITY or a NOTICE of conversion of liability. Dr Sam Kennedy.

CREATING AN INDEMNITY BOND

The HELL FIRE STRATEGY!So YOU could issue a bond, place it into the public record and of course NOTICE then has to be given to the

party that is making the claim which is probably the CLERK OF COURT. So if that were me, I would issue anINDEMNITY BOND naming the Judge, the Clerk, the prosecutor of the case and the Statute as ACCOUNTHOLDERS and accounts on that Bond. Now I like to make the presentment privately to the parties in context ofa Foreign Advisory which gives NOTICE of the existence of that Bond. It gives NOTICE of settlement and



18/39

that all happens on the PRIVATE SIDE. That BOND is serving as my COUNTERCLAIM and that is ALL itshould take.

It could be a one page scribbled letter saying, Heres a copy of a Bond. Please note that you have been namedthereon and hence I am the UNDERWRITERorTITLE HOLDERorFIRST IN LINE LIEN HOLDER. Ihave the First right of Lien to this transaction (To this matter or to this issue or to this case) Dr Sam Kennedy.

CREDIT DEBT BASED SYSTEMMost people look at credit as a GIFT. Many people when they get a CREDIT CARD, approved from acredit card company will literally look at it as NEW FOUND MONEY, as if they have actually beengiven something and NOT look at it as having another PAIR OF SHACKLES stamped around their

wrists or ankles. It is like a TIME MACHINE, credit is like a time machine. If you CANT afford to buysomething right now with what you have right now and you buy it on installment payments in a sense

you are bringing it FROM THE FUTURE that you cant afford, and bringing it into the present so youcan have it right now for the GRATIFICATION or DESIRE that you need right now and then you payit off with todays UNCERTAIN DOLLARS.

One of the INSANITIES of the 20th Century is that EVERYBODY lives in a separate Box and it isconsidered a badge of shame or failure to still be living with your family when you either 20, 30 or

even 40 years old. One of the problems with our socialized DEBT based system is that it SCATTERSFAMILY to the wind. When you have CRADLE TO GRAVE rainbow welfare state that takes care of

you 100% everything is subsidized to the point where you could fail virtually completely and theresstill this RAINBOW OF BENEFITS to take care of you but it also destroys the family because everyoneis FREE to break off on their own, establish their own roots and buytheir own Box and try todesperately pay for it and even go into debt just for the basics. This WHOLE system goes against thefamilyto PULL together as a team as was 100 plus years ago.

CHALLENGE

This comes from the Following website (click on Link) - www.thinkfree.ca

Freeman-on-the-Land Robert-Arthur: Menard Does hereby extend a CHALLENGE TODEBATE

To: Any and All members ofThe Law Society of BC or Canadian Bar Association

Any and All Judges of the Provincial Court of British Columbia

Any and All Judges of the Supreme Court of British Columbia

Any and All Crown Prosecutors

Any and All Peace Officers and Police Officers

Any and All Canada Revenue Agents

Any and All Corrections or Sheriffs Officers

Any and All MPs MLAs or other elected officials

TOPICS TO BE DEBATED:

Do statutes enjoy the force of law without the consent of the governed?(FreemanRobert-Arthur says No)

http://www.thinkfree.ca/http://www.thinkfree.ca/


19/39

Do courts require mutual consent of both parties to the adjudication prior to providingservices? (Freeman Robert-Arthur says Yes)

Does a SIN mean we are working legally for the legal entity known as CANADA?(Freeman Robert-Arthur

says Yes)

Can we abandon our SIN and avoid paying income taxes? (Freeman Robert-Arthursays Yes)

Can we fire the government and exist free of all statutory restraints and obligations?(Freeman Robert-Arthur says Yes)

Do the people of British Columbia have a right to justice and can they lawfullyconvene their own courts to bring charges against the existing courts? (Freeman

Robert-Arthur says Yes)

If this challenge is not accepted then it shall be deemed that all of the above thingsFreeman-on-the-Land Robert-Arthur: Menard is willing to debate and defend are in fact

truths and do in fact bind the government and those to whom this challenge has beenextended. If this challenge is not accepted then a seminar explaining all these truths willbe presented. Furthermore failure to accept this lawful challenge will be seen by most asevidence that the government has been knowingly and willfully employing negligence,deception and fraud. Go to www.thinkfree.ca for more details

DEFENDANT is TOBY THE SLAVE

Someone is standing, in court, at a microphone, WHO does the JUDGE SEE? The Judge sees THEDEFENDANT because that is the ONLY PARTY that the Judge can SEE. And so when the judge looks at theguy and says, You have to get an attorney. Well excuse me! THE JUDGE IS BLIND! He ONLY ASSUMESthat I am TOBY THE SLAVE, The Defendant. I dont believe for one second that he has the CAPACITY toCOMPEL me to be TOBY. If I KNOW that I am not TOBY and the Judge looks straight at me and says, You

need to get an attorney, Ill go home and write a LETTER ROGATORY and turn over the BIRTHCERTIFICATE into the court and tell them that they are now the OPERATORand half at it, you can appointanyone you want to REPRESENT TOBY! Hasnt that solved the problem now? Jack Smith.

Next time a court session is there and I show up again and the judge says, Have you got an attorney? WHODOES HE THINK I AM? THE DEFENDANT, TOBY THE SLAVE! How am I going to respond to thejudge? ASK A QUESTION!Your Honour, hasnt the court been notified that they are the OPERATORof the ACCOUNT through the SURRENDER OF THE DEFENDANT? Has the court not seen fit to

appoint counsel for the DEFENDANT? And then shut the heck up! What have you just done? The court isgoing to have to come up with some kind of story to fill the embarrassment. Do you understand? If you want tovolunteer and be TOBY, the Defendant, go ahead! And if you say nothing, you either are in CONTEMPT ofcourt or you volunteer to be TOBY!- Jack Smith

CREDIT DEBT BASED SYSTEM

Most people look at credit as a GIFT. Many people when they get a CREDIT CARD, approved from acredit card company will literally look at it as NEW FOUND MONEY, as if they have actually beengiven something and NOT look at it as having another PAIR OF SHACKLES stamped around their

wrists or ankles. It is like a TIME MACHINE, credit is like a time machine. If you CANT afford to buysomething right now with what you have right now and you buy it on installment payments in a sense

you are bringing it FROM THE FUTURE that you cant afford, and bringing it into the present so youcan have it right now for the GRATIFICATION or DESIRE that you need right now and then you payit off with todays UNCERTAIN DOLLARS.



20/39

One of the INSANITIES of the 20th Century is that EVERYBODY lives in a separate Box and it isconsidered a badge of shame or failure to still be living with your family when you either 20, 30 oreven 40 years old. One of the problems with our socialized DEBT based system is that it SCATTERSFAMILY to the wind. When you have CRADLE TO GRAVE rainbow welfare state that takes care of

you 100% everything is subsidized to the point where you could fail virtually completely and theresstill this RAINBOW OF BENEFITS to take care of you but it also destroys the family because everyone

is FREE to break off on their own, establish their own roots and buytheir own Box and try todesperately pay for it and even go into debt just for the basics. This WHOLE system goes against thefamilyto PULL together as a team as was 100 plus years ago.

CERTIFYING YOUR DOCUMENTS

Whats TRUE and CORRECT? The ONLY thing that is EVER True and Correct are the WORDS put onto thepaper THATS IT! and ONLY AT THAT MOMENT! When something is CERTIFIED it is ONLY certifiedup until the MOMENT it is certified, afterwards it DOESNT APPLY.An affidavit is only good up until the moment it is certified, because after that you might change your mind

again. SO it has NO force and effect after CERTIFICATION. The government CANNOT accept paperworkUNLESS it has been CERTIFIED.They need to see someone put their signature on their forms THEN they will ACCEPT IT. So if someone puts a

signature to something that says its true and correct on government forms, they WILL accept it BUT all they areaccepting is INFORMATION, nothing more! Victor Robert: Beck

BREACH OF CONTRACT

Now from the point of view of a Sovereign Individual what has happened is that there has been a BREACHOF CONTRACT with our government. Government has usurped the common law, thats the 10 commandmentsand replaced it with a form of the Roman Civil law, thats the TEN PLANKS to the communist manifesto and asa result government is constantly managing our affairs without our authority, but they certainly have ourconsent.George Gordon

HANDY INFO ON BIRTH CERTIFICATES

An ENTRY is regarded as a RECORD ofFACTS AT THE TIME (Or moment) ofBIRTH NOT afterthe Fact. A BIRTH CERTIFICATE accordingly constitutes revealing NOT current identity BUTHISTORICAL FACTS. A BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS NOTPERSONAL IDENTIFICATION. So aBIRTH CERTIFICATE is NOTpersonal IDENTIFICATION however it is being treated as if it is personalidentification.Victor-Robert: Beck

WARNING ON BIRTH CERTIFICATES

the government point out that the use of birth certificates for identification purposes is DISCOURAGED by theREGISTRAR GENERAL [discouraged does not mean encouraged] and birth certificates areNOT evidence ofthe IDENTITY of the person PRESENTING IT. Do you understand what that means?However it is a matter for the individuals whether to follow this recommendation or not. When you POINT

OUT to the government that you didnt DISCLOSE what this is, you DIDNT WARN me what this is, eitheryou DID this to DECEIVE ME or youre going to fix the problem very, very quickly Victor-Robert: Beck

FREELY GIVEN FREELY RECEIVED

Trinity is representative ofthree of four components. Every Heart from where love comes has four chambers.If one pays with debt money, the stuff everyone wants, the contract lives and thus there is no true closure. Inother words, if one pays with debt money, although the account will reflect the payment, in fact no payment wasmade, thus the contract lives as does the obligation because the account could not close, although unseen andunknown to you but is why you are stuck in the legal BS.The missing component is the spirit of love..........Unconditional giving to receive without asking anythingin return. I give plus to you, you give plus back and I give plus to Brent and Brent gives plus back to Me, and



21/39

on we can all go forever and ever amen. There is no accounting here if the giving is done happily andungrudgingly, serving out of love. It is themissing of the giving of a plus (lack of love) that the trouble begins and in come the doctors/lawyers to actagainst you because the only reason they are, is because you did not release the legal title son. Here there is anaccounting because of all the contracts that are still alive. Not closed although in the public they are butinternally with the trustee they are not.For the legal guy the son is the legal title to the product/Value birthed from the contract as thats what gives life,

is growth, and expansion, in the business world just as it is in God's world, and why it is what it is as it createditself as God created the uni-verse, one song, one way home, one word, vibration..........The love frequency.Giving and receiving freely without, hesitation or resistance.And then there was the word..........LOVE....................the beginning and the end of all that is, but view from abusiness/legal world perspective after having seen who you are from an I am made by the God of all godsperspective. Ta Daaaa....

FIRST HAND PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE

The prosecutor does NOT have FIRST HAND PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE, nor does he have theCapability to CERTIFY that the CHARGE is[1] Accurate because he wasnt there! And number

[2] that the Statute that theyre ACTING UNDERis BONDED and INSURED! What youre dealing with is

PRIVATE CORPORATE LAW. Youre NOT dealing with PUBLIC LAW Sam Davis

FIDUCIARIES & TRUSTEES- appointed govt officials

People who have been appointed to serve as Fiduciaries and Trustees of the Publicwheel are under an Inescapable obligation to serve the people with the highest Fidelity.In discharging the duties of their office they are required to display such intelligence andskill as they are capable of and be diligent and conscientious to exercise their Discretion,not arbitrarily but reasonably and above all to display good faith, honesty, integrity andhonour in order to protect and maintain the Private Rights of each and every living soulthat each man or woman holding office have obligated themselves to uphold."

EQUALITY IS EQUITY

EQUALITY is Equity and the concept of EQUALITY we are referring to for purposes of this information isbased upon an unconditional desire to serve others first and foremost. God set us all out EQUAL and if anytransaction of any kind, legal or not, leaves any party better or worse off than the other(s), that is not the equalityand not equity. The concept of Equity/Love is equality. You do not and cannot have a claim in equity if allparties that are or will be affected by a transaction do not walk away equal; that is to say, no party can claim anyother party was unjustly enriched = balanced scales.......EQUALITY of the non payment kind.There are three parties to be concerned about here on this earth.The public the government and you. Each cannot have claim against any other for there to be equality......Nowthere is what you see, the tangible property, and what you do not see, the form, to be taken into considerationthat fits with this information............See if you see it............2000 years but I think we know the meaning of the Crucifixion of Christ. A Father Son thing, from a solar andlegal system perspective.

Our Father who art in Heaven, hallowed be thy name, thy kingdom come, thou shalt be done on earth as it isin Heaven, give us this day our daily bread and forgive us our debts as weforgive our debtors, and lead us notinto temptation, but deliver us from evil, for thyne is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever andever......... In other words, however Heaven is, so to is it the same here on earth, except judgement gets in theway.God in Heaven = Property/Growth/Multiply = god on earth/Government____________________________________________________________________PEOPLE/Son = GOODS AND SERVICES = TITLE/SON



22/39

When the Son/Promise is Homes-Car's-Furniture When the Son (Value)returned after death, the is released, death of theaccount is Closed Contract/Promise/Obligation

There shall be a death occur, and the account is closed.

There must be a death for a life/contract to be holy/whole/finished.

FIDUCIARIES AND PRINCIPALS

Everyone out there right now believes that the BIRTH CERTIFICATE and other GOVERNMENTIDENTIFICATION is PERSONAL identification but ITS NOT. That is the mistake that has got us allBOUND UP, thats the focus point right here. The birth certificate is NOT personal identification, if you curethat problem then all of the EFFECTS change too. So if you GO BACK to the CAUSE of the problem andCORRECT IT the effect changes subsequently automatically Victor-Robert: Beck[Just a note here! If you have not picked up on this yet the key word above is PERSONAL identification.

It is evidence of a historical event because the govt can ONLY register an event.- it CANNOT EVER

identify you or anyone else for that matter- Pierino]

All the companies you are doing business with believe you ARE the BIRTH CERTIFICATE/STRAWMAN

thats the PROBLEM, nothing else, It SITS right there- Victor Robert: Beck[Remember that ALL POWER AND AUTHORITY WAS GIVEN UNTO YOU!- AS THE PRINCIPAL!]

"So in effect what's happening is that the FIDUCIARIES are RUNNING the world instead of thePRINICIPALS. The PRINICIPALS HAVE NOT shown up yet- And that's YOU PEOPLE!"-Victor-Robert:Beck

QUOTE!

"Liberty lives in you HEART, it does NOT live in ANY founding document/s" -Lighting the Fires ofLiberty!

LEGAL ENTITYWell Look at South Australia. I exist as a man in South Australia. I DO NOT exist as a PERSON in theSTATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA and thats part of their deception and they DONT want you to realize thatits NOT a geographical area, its a LEGAL ENTITY, therefore what you call laws are really JUST the rulesfor the PERSONS existing within this LEGAL ENTITY.

THE HELL FIRE STRATEGY!- REMEDY!

Hello One and All,

I just want to caution everyone against going down the path of placing liens against officials, orliquidating any person and/or thinking about conversion of dishonours into monetary gains, especiallyif you are proceeding in any matter whereby YOU are the party seeking a remedy [i.e. from adefensive position].

This type of thinking really does stem from the assumption and presumption that the public officialsare corrupt and do not operate within the law. All public officials have a duty and obligation to protectone's rights and from my own experience they do in fact protect them, but more so when one seekinga remedy has gone about it in the correct manner - which is really what the problem is - a lack ofknowledge as to how to do this. The public officials do in fact deliberately go into a dishonour in orderto give you your remedy which usually manifests itself in silence or argument in order to AGREE withyou. Once one has that AGREEMENT through the silence of one or more of the public officials one



23/39

must be focused upon using that dishonour as evidence of their agreement rather than on placingliens, liquidation or any conversion of that dishonour into public liability instruments which in and ofitself is going against the grain, if you are expecting the public officials to recognize that you are theliving breathing sentient man who knows there is no money.

Once you have a public official in a dishonourand therefore their agreement by that dishonour[silence or argument], then one's honourable duty and obligation is to present their record of that

dishonour [agreement/stipulation ] to the appropriate data integrity review board for review in order tohave the records corrected - one should not be doing any form of charging or attacking at that time.Other than proceeding on the very counterproductive assumption and presumption that the publicofficials are deliberately corrupt I cannot see how conversion of a dishonour into funds or placing anyliens on any public officials or liquidating any public official can still be proceeding in an honourablemanner. From my relatively medium term but very intensive experience and focus, this type ofthinking arises out of both a lack of practical experience and adequate understanding of theprocedures that one must follow and apply to obtain their remedy in an honourable manner.

Scripture does NOT say, "go first to your brother and get an agreement [stipulation through his silenceand/or arguments which both constitute a dishonour] and then either liquidate him or convert thatdishonour into funny money or place a lien on him"

It is far better for the so-called experts to admit that they do not fully understand a certain process, orcannot fully understand why a remedy was not given in a certain matter and/or admit that they havenot had the level of success that they would like to claim rather than teaching people to bypass thehonourable way of settling and closing a matter. It is RARE for a public official not to grant a remedywhereby a party has executed such remedy in the correct manner, this usually only happens by way ofsincere and genuine error of law, and it is far more scripturally sound and morally ethical to admit thatone has not yet mastered an entire process.

If one has to resort to liquidation or placing of liens or conversion of dishonours into funny moneywhen there is clearly a remedy without having to resort to such tactics, then one should perhapsconsider embarking on that journey to find the rest of the pieces of the puzzle which they have not yet

discovered ather than attempting to charge their brother. The majority of people appear to end upgoing down the incorrect road rather than admitting that they are "not there yet". Regards Claude

One of the HELL FIRE STRATEGIES is LIQUIDATION.

In context of COMMERCE what that means is that we take their DISHONOUR, the CONVERSION OF

LIABILITY and we use that as the MONETARY EXPANSION to fund an instrument to Treasury to haveTreasury SECURE or SEIZE the Fugitive or STOLEN funds from the presenters bond.How can a DISHONOURbe funds? Well a dishonour is NOTHING MORE than a LIABILITY and it isCERTIFIED as a liability. It is CLEAR that in the system of COMMERCE, the system of BANKRUPTCY inwhich we NOW exist in, a commercial system based upon an ABSENCE of tangible assets ( SUBSTANCE

MONEY) AND uses as its monetary curriculum LIABILITY! LIABILITY IS THE CURRICULUM OF PAYMENT! A FICTIONAL ASSET IN THE SYSTEM. Theliability of a DISHONOUR is in theory the same as payment of the instrument of which the dishonour is DULYNOTED.

If you pay Federal Reserve notes to someone, $100 dollars and they send it back to you and say Im sorry weonly accept cheques they have CONVERTED THE LIABILITY into FUNDS that they have to then applyagainst the account. I paid YOU the $100, you REJECTED

list-of-court-quotes

Documents