linking resources

27
Linking resources Praha, June 2001 Ole Husby, BIBSYS [email protected]

Upload: megara

Post on 19-Jan-2016

17 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Linking resources. Praha, June 2001 Ole Husby, BIBSYS [email protected]. Linking resources. = linking of resources ? = resources for linking ? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Linking resources

Linking resources

Praha, June 2001Ole Husby, BIBSYS

[email protected]

Page 2: Linking resources

Linking resources

= linking of resources ?= resources for linking ?

"Identifying and categorizing relations is a necessary requirement for the formal description that makes navigation possible in the bibliographic universe"

(Knut Hegna)

Page 3: Linking resources

What is a link?

A link is an expression of a relation

orA link is a connection from one page to

another destination such as another page or a different location on the same page

:=(

orA link is underlined and blue :=(

Page 4: Linking resources

Different types of relations

• Aggregate (whole / part)• Generic• Associative

• Some relations are a priori given by the nature of things

• While others are made up by us• Still others are deduced from statistics

Page 5: Linking resources

FRBR

• FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) is modelling:

• Entities• Attributes• Relations

Page 6: Linking resources

FRBR relations

• between Work, Expression, Manifestation and Item:– E2 <translation of> E1– M1 <manifestation of> E1

• to Persons and Corporate Bodies:– P1 <author of> W1– I1 <owned by> C1

Page 7: Linking resources

more FRBR relations

• to Concept, Object, Event, Place– W1 <is about> C1

• between Persons and Corporate Bodies:– P1 <often cites> P2– P3 <often cited together with> P4

• between Concepts:– C1 <subspecies of> C2

Page 8: Linking resources

A link is an expression of a relation

Different ways of expressing:

– Citing together– Explicitly stating in text ("See:")– Using controlled vocabularies– Data modelling (relational databases)– Sharing metadata (identifiers etc.)– Linking in hypertext ( looks like this )

Page 9: Linking resources

New opportunities (and needs)

• New opportunities offered by hypertext and especially the WWW

• It's up to the user to click!• The omnipresence of the WWW has

raised users' expectations in regard to linking everything together: – OPACS and A&I databases and Ejournals

and other fulltext archives and . . .

Page 10: Linking resources

Links as entities in a digital library

• Separate link databases are flourishing:

– SilverLinker– CrossRef– Other commercial solutions– Proprietary solutions

• Most are "closed" or "static" in some respect

Page 11: Linking resources

Reference linking

from metadata (reference) to the full-content

– The reference (source) may be held in a database or be a citation (more or less formally described) within some document

– The full-content (target) may be "anything, anywhere" with a network identifier

Page 12: Linking resources

Some reference links

• From an A&I database record to the full text

• From a citation included in a document to the full text

• From an OPAC record to an ejournal TOC with further linking possibilities

Page 13: Linking resources

Static links

• Most linking architectures are static:

– The links are precomputed ("just in case", "a priori")

– The target space is a controlled environment

– The links are "foolproof"

Page 14: Linking resources

Dynamic links

• Dynamic links are created "a posteriori" (just in time)

• The target space need not be controlled• Dynamic links are probabilistic: they

might not work

• The link creation can include link verification– but that probably takes too long

Page 15: Linking resources

CrossRef

• A linking service operated by PILA (Publisher International Linking Association):

– Implemented as a static link database– Link targets are DOIs– Access to the metadata -> DOI resolution

requires PILA membership

Page 16: Linking resources

Extended service links

• Reference links usually targets one specific copy of the full-content entity

• But the user might need / prefer:– Full content from another supplier– An OPAC holdings description– A copy ordering / ILL service– Another metadata description / abstract– A book review or access to a net bookshop– A "full web" search

Page 17: Linking resources

Appropriate links

• Every conceivable link is not appropriate to the user, because of– Diverse personal preferences (formats,

delivery options etc.)– Diverse institutional preferences– Access restrictions– Temporary unavailability

• These and other parameters constitute the context of the user

Page 18: Linking resources

Closed linking

• Closed links are not context sensitive:

– They might not work (access restrictions)– They ignore the policy of the user's library– They ignore the user's "real" needs and

preferences

Page 19: Linking resources

Open linking

• Open linking = context sensitive linking• Open linking architectures support

extended services

• One early implementation is SFX ("Special Effects"), now a part of the MetaLib product from Ex Libris

Page 20: Linking resources

OpenURL and service components

• OpenURL is a framework for implementing open linking

• The OpenURL is taken as input for a service component

• There may be several service components available

• OpenURL is under consideration as a NISO standard

Page 21: Linking resources

OpenURL

"The OpenURL is designed to enable the transfer of the metadata from the information service to a service component that can provide context-sensitive services for the transferred metadata"

(OPENURL SYNTAX DESCRIPTIONhttp://www.sfxit.com/OpenURL/)

Page 22: Linking resources

OpenURL example

http://scomp.bibsys.no/copy?sid=BIBSYS:ERL&issn=1234-5678

&date=1998&volume=12&issue=2&spage=134

Base URLIdentifies the service component

ORIGIN-DESCRIPTION (optional)Identifies the information service which is the source of the

metadata

OBJECT-DESCRIPTIONConsists of the metadata for the information item

Page 23: Linking resources

Conclusions

• As the digital library is globally distributed, we all have to work together!

– Use persistent identifiers– Use open linking architectures– Implement extended services– Support the OpenURL syntax– Open up the CrossRef database for non-

members !?

Page 24: Linking resources

References

FRBR:Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records:http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.htm

Reference linking, OpenURL:Look for articles by Herbert van de Sompel in the Dlib Magazine:http://www.dlib.org/dlib/

Page 25: Linking resources

Appendix: Linking in BIBSYS

• Between OPAC records, using

– MARC "linking entry fields" 76x - 78x– Supplementary proprietary mechanisms– Uniform titles, authority data– (simulating FRBR structure in a database of

manifestations)

Page 26: Linking resources

More linking in BIBSYS

• Between OPAC records and authors• Between thesauruses / classification

schemes and OPAC records• Between OPAC records and full text

– Using MARC field 856 (Electronic location)– Implementing URN:NBN resolving for

Norwegian domain– Using separate link file for ejournals

(context-sensitive)

Page 27: Linking resources

More linking in BIBSYS

• Within digitized text documents– Using proprietary mechanism for linking the

separate pages of scanned documents

• From locally hosted A&I databases to BIBSYS holdings and copy request service– ERL (SilverPlatter), ISI

• From third-party bibliographic databases to BIBSYS holdings and copy request service– OCLC FirstSearch, Ovid . . .