line parameters of the ph 3 pentad in the 4-5 µm region v. malathy devi and d. chris benner college...
TRANSCRIPT
LINE PARAMETERS OF THE PH3 PENTAD IN THE 4-5 µm REGION
V. MALATHY DEVI and D. CHRIS BENNER
College of William and Mary
I.KLEINER
CNRS/IPSL-Universites Paris-ESt and Diderot, France
R. L. SAMS and T. A. BLAKE
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
L. R. BROWN
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
L. N. FLETCHER
Department of Physics, University of Oxford
OverviewWhy are we interested in PH3 pentad?
Previous studies and energy levelsResonances & interactions in the pentadExperimental conditions & sample spectra
Preliminary results on Position and Intensity fits
Line shapes (widths, shifts, line mixing & speed dependence)
widths vs. J and KEmpirical fits for widths
Comparison of widths in n1 & n3 to n2 & n4 Conclusions and acknowledgments
Phosphine is a molecule of astrophysical and astronomical interest. It has been observed on both the Jupiter and Saturn
• It is a symmetric top molecule with a pyramidal structure; has 4 IR fundamental vibrational bands, 1, 2, 3 and 4.
• The most prominent absorption features in the pentad are the two strong overlapping bands 1 and 3 located at 2321.131 and 2326.877 cm-1.
• The other 3 bands in the pentad (22, 2+ 4, and 24) are weak and are located on the lower wavenumber side.
• The complicated rotational structures of the 1 and 3 give rise to strong Coriolis-type interaction between them. Other types of anharmonic interactions also occur among the various bands.
• The Coriolis interaction gives rise to many “forbidden” transitions and also results in large A+A- splittings.
The pentad region is revisited; because
• Accurate knowledge of line parameters for PH3 is important for Cassini/VIMS exploration of Saturn and for correct interpretation of Jovian observations by JUNO and ESA′s newly-selected mission, JUICE.
• A puzzling inconsistency in the mixing ratio derivations of PH3 with altitude
from Cassini VIMS and Cassini CIRS experiments were noticed by astronomers
and attributed it to the poor knowledge of PH3 spectroscopy in the pentad.
• Line parameters (e.g. positions and intensities) for all five bands in the 1930-
2440 cm-1 are measured to improve the spectroscopic database for remote
sensing of the giant planets.
• Analysis of high resolution, high S/N spectra of high purity PH3 recorded with the Bruker FTS at PNNL and the McMath-Pierce FTS on Kitt Peak are made.
• The strong 1 and 3 bands are recorded using very short absorption path cells (~ 1.05 cm).
A brief survey of earlier studies is outlined next
PRIOR STUDIES OF PH3 ( and S) IN THE PENTAD Band Parameter Investigators Instrument or
data usedResolution
(cm-1)Year
n1 and n3 Rovibrational and relative intensities
Baldacci et al. Grating Spectrometer
0.025-0.035 1980
n1 and n3 Line Intensities, few line widths
Lovejoy et al. Tunable diode laser
Doppler limited
1985
2n2 , n2+n4 Rovibrational Constants
Tipton et al. FTS 0.01 1986
2n2 , n2+n4,2n4, n1, n3
Pentad, Theoretical Modeling
Tarrago et al. Using FTS data 0.0054 1990
2n2 , n2+n4,2n4, n1, n3
Positions and int. (line-by-line simulation)
Tarrago et al. FTS 0.0054 1992
n1, n3, 2n4,n2+n4
Assignments and A+A- splittings
Ulenikov et al. FTS 0.005 2002
n1 and n3 Line intensities Suarez FTS 0.002 2002
n1, n3, 2n4,n2+n4
HITRAN 2000 update
Kleiner et al. Tarrago et al. line parameters
0.0054 2003
n1, n3, 2n4,n2+n4 Line Intensities Wang et al. FTS 0.005 2005
dyad, pentad, octad
Global Modeling Nikitin et al. FTS data from various sources
0.002-0.0115 2009
Development of the theoretical model and new programs G. Tarrago et al., J. Mol. Spectrosc.1990
22 2+4
l4
24
l4
1 3
l3
22 K-type
interaction Diag
Coriolis CoriolisFermi
Fermi Coriolis
2+4 l- type interaction
Diag
CoriolisFermi
CoriolisFermi
242 l- type interaction
Diag
CoriolisFermi
CoriolisFermi
1 K-type Interaction
Diag
Coriolis
3 l- type interaction
Diag
Previous studies (not exhaustive)• The Octad: The 8 vibrational bands shown on the left
Line positions at low resolution
(Maki et al., J Chem Phys, 1973)
Line positions and intensities, high resolution
(Butler et al., J Mol Spectrosc, 2006)
A Global analysis of the dyad, pentad and octad (Nikitin et al., J Mol Spectrosc, 2009)
• The pentad (middle left): 2n2, n2+n4, 2n4, n1, n3 bands
Line Positions: fit to an rms=0.009 cm-1 up to J=16
(Tarrago et al., J Mol Spectrosc, 1992,
Ulenikov et al., J Mol Spectrosc, 2002)
Intensities: modeled to an rms.= 13%
(Tarrago et al., J Mol Spectrosc, 1992)
•The dyad (bottom left): n2, n4 bands
Line Positions: fit to an rms.=0.0004 cm-1 up to J=22
(Fusina et al., J Mol Struct, 2000). Intensities: rms.=2%
(L.R. Brown et al., J Mol Spectrosc, 2002)
Lorentz self-broadened width coefficients
(J. Salem et al., J Mol Spectrosc, 2004)
Experimental conditions of PNNL and Kitt Peak spectra, two illustrative spectra recorded at PNNL
Bruker FTS at PNNL at 0.0022 cm-1
T = 298.2 K; Path length = 1.045 cm
Sample Pressures (Torr)2.048 4.24 10.152 22.46 50.11Spectra were used for n1, n3, 2n4 and n2+n4
McMath-Pierce FTS at 0.0115 cm-1
T= 289-294 K; Path length=425 cm
Sample Pressures (Torr)1.50 3.72 3.16 6.30 Spectra were used for the weak 2n2
mm5 room temperature spectra with the PNNL FTS were fit
simultaneously using the multispectrum fitting technique
3-4 Kitt Peak FTS were fit by single spectrum fitting
technique for 2n2 transitions
Top left (RED): 4.24 TorrBottom left (Blue):22.46 Torr
Preliminary Energy Fit Results and a comparisonBAND 0 (cm-1) # lines rms (cm-1)
2n2 1972.578 168 0.0033
n2+n4 2108.185 631 0.0027
2n4, l=0 2226.835 352 0.0034
2n4, l=±2 2234.835 644 0.0034
n1 2321.124 384 0.0030
n3 2326.797 812 0.0031
172 0.0011
657 0.0018
415 0.0011
657 0.0015
454 0.0017
980 0.0018
Nikitin et al., 2009
3287 line positions, up to J=14
67 floated parameters for the upper states; GS constants: fixed
Global fit:gs, dyad, pentad, octad
For the pentad:374 fixed parameters
144 floated parameters
INTENSITIY FITS1308 line intensities are fit with 19 adjustable
parameters; 6 leading terms of the dipole moment derivatives and 13 Herman-Wallis terms
Band # lines rms(%)
2n2 120 6.9
n2+n4 391 10.4
2n4 (l = 0) 141 10.2
2n4 (l = 2) 165 10.1
n1 159 9.2
n3 332 8.0
The higher pressure spectra allowed us to measure self-width and self-shift coefficients
Black: 2.048 Torr
Red: 4.24 Torr
Blue:10.152 Torr
Pink: 22. 46 Torr
Green: 50.11 Torr
)()1)(( 000 selfGasp
)()()( 0000 TTTT
2
000
01
000
0 ),)(()1)(,)((),(n
L
n
LL T
TTpselfb
T
TTpGasbpTpb
Some of the A+A- pairs of lines exhibited Line Mixing. A non Voigt line shape including line mixing and speed
dependence was used to fit the data.Line mixing was
measured applying the off diagonal relaxation matrix
formalism, e.g.;
[12C16O results: V. Malathy Devi et al., JQSRT 113 (2012)
1013-1033]
Line 1 at 2218.38533(1) cm-1
Line 2 at 2218.42965(1) cm-1
PP(13,9) pair K″=9 splittingSelf line mixing: 0.0291 (4)
cm-1 atm-1 at 296 K
LORENTZ SELF-BROADENED WIDTH COEFFICIENTS IN THE 3 BAND OF PH3
Self-broadened width coefficients (cm-1 atm-1 at
296 K) vs. Jm and Km
The term 0.05*(Jm-Km) helps trend recognition Jm and Km are max. J and K(a) Width vs. Jm for each
Km
(b) Width vs. Km for each Jm
Where no error bars are visible, the errors are smaller
then the font size used
EMPIRICAL POLYNOMIAL FITS FOR SELF WIDTHS IN THE 3 BANDLEFT PANELS: ALL TRANSITIONS EXCEPT J=K
RIGHT PANEL: ONLY J=K LINES
Left: (a) Widths vs. Jm and (b) Widths vs. Km (all lines except J=K )
Top: ONLY J=K LINES
The term 0.5* (Jm-Km) is used for trend recognition
Comparisons of widths in the 1 and 3 bands [PS] to the 2 and 4 bands
[Salem et al. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 223 (2004) 174-181]Transition J” K” Band [PS] Widtha [PS] Band [Salem et al.] Width (SDRP) a,b Ratio; [PS/Salem et al.]
QR 2 0 1 0.1105(3) 2 0.1121(46) 0.986±0.041
QR 2 1 1 0.1100(2) 2 0.1103(27) 0.997±0.024
QR 7 0 1 0.1085(2) 2 0.1102(29) 0.985±0.026
QR 7 1 1 0.1057(2) 2 0.1070(29) 0.988±0.027
QR 7 2 1 0.1073(2) 2 0.1079(41) 0.994±0.038
QR 7 5 1 0.1052(2) 2 0.0995(34) 1.057±0.037
QR 9 4 1 0.1022(2) 2 0.1044(24) 0.979±0.023
QR 10 2 1 0.1009(3) 2 0.1014(27) 0.995±0.027
QR 10 7 1 0.1047(12) 2 0.0988(23) 1.056±0.027
QR 12 2 1 0.0965(5) 2 0.0994(37) 0.971±0.036
QR 12 9 1 0.0882(19) 2 0.0945(28) 0.933±0.034
Mean & std. dev. 0.995±0.036PP 3 1 3 0.1131(1) 4 0.1123(28) 1.007±0.025
RP 4 1 3 0.1132(2) 4 0.1147(37) 0.987±0.032
RP 6 1 3 0.1169(2) 4 0.1113(30) 1.050±0.028
RP 7 0 3 0.1111(1) 4 0.1107(27) 1.004±0.024
PP 7 4 3 0.1071(1) 4 0.1086(28) 0.986±0.025
PP 8 5 3 0.1060(1) 4 0.1101(26) 0.963±0.023
RP 10 1 3 0.1042(2) 4 0.1054(38) 0.989±0.036
PP 11 11 3 0.0736(1) 4 0.0748(19) 0.984±0.025
Mean & std. dev. 0.996±0.023
a Units are cm-1 atm-1 at 298.2 K; b Speed-Dependent Rautian Profile.
CONCLUSIONS
o Over 4000 line positions and intensities are measured. o The rotational quantum numbers of measured lines go as high as J
″=16 and K″=15 in the 1 and 3 bands.
o The measured positions and intensities are modeled using new theoretical calculations in the pentad. The analyses are in progress.
o More than 800 Lorentz self-broadened widths and self-induced pressure shift coefficients are measured in several bands.
o Off-diagonal relaxation matrix elements are determined for a number of A+A- transitions with K″= 3, 6, and 9.
o Speed dependence parameters are also retrieved for several transitions.ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
NASA’s Outer Planetary Research Program supported the work performed at the College of William and Mary. Research at the Jet propulsion Laboratory (JPL), California Institute of Technology, was performed under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The United States Department of Energy supported part of this research and was conducted at the W.R. Wiley Environmental Molecular Sciences laboratory, a national scientific user facility sponsored by the Department of Energy’s Office of Biological and Environmental Research and located at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). PNNL is operated for the United States Department of Energy by the Battelle Memorial Institute under Contract DE-AC05-76RLO 1830. I. Kleiner wishes to thank the financial support by ANR-08-BLAN-0054 for this project. L.N. Fletcher acknowledges the support by a Glasstone Science Fellowship at the University of Oxford.
THANK YOU