limitation of the ecris performance by kinetic plasma instabilities o. tarvainen, t. kalvas, h....
TRANSCRIPT
Limitation of the ECRIS performance by kinetic plasma
instabilitiesO. Tarvainen, T. Kalvas, H. Koivisto, J. Komppula, R. Kronholm, J. Laulainen
University of Jyväskylä
I. Izotov, D. Mansfeld, V. Skalyga Institute of Applied Physics – Russian Academy of Sciences
V. ToivanenCERN
G. MachicoaneNational Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University
The 16th International Conference on Ion Sources
New York, NY, USA, August 2015
Content
ECRIS magnetic field configuration and semiempirical scaling laws
Instabilities in ECRIS plasmas
Experimental setup and diagnostics signals
Instabilities limiting ECRIS performance
ECRIS magnetic field
Superposition of solenoid and sextupole fields
The magnetic field configuration serves for three purposes
The figure is by courtesy of C. Lyneis
Resonance condition
Electrons gain sufficient energy for the ionization of highly charged ions and cause significant wall bremsstrahlung
Plasma (electron) confinement
Binj = magnetic field at injection
Bext = magnetic field at extraction
Bmin = minimum magnetic field
Brad = radial magnetic field at the pole
Result: electron confinement
Binj
Bext
Bmin
Brad
Suppression of MHD instabilities
∂B/∂r < 0
∂B/∂r ≥ 0
JYFL 14 GHz ECRIS
Conditions for suppressing MHD instabilities
and ∂B/∂r ≥ 0
OK
Sextupole
Solenoid
Empirical scaling laws of ECRIS B-fieldD. Hitz, A. Girard, G. Melin, S. Gammino, G. Ciavola, L. CelonaRev. Sci. Instrum. 73, (2002), p. 509.
Brad affected by the solenoid field!
ECRIS performance vs. Bmin/BECR
VENUS 18 GHz Xe26+
D. Leitner, C.M. Lyneis, T. Loew, D.S. Todd, S. Virostek and O. Tarvainen, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77(3), (2006).
0.75
ECRIS performance vs. Bmin/BECR
H. Arai, M. Imanaka, S.M. Lee, Y. Higurashi, T. Nakagawa, M. Kidera, T. Kageyama, M. Kase, Y. Yano and T. Aihara, Nucl.Instrum. Meth. A 491, 1-2, (2002).
RAMSES 18 GHz Kr15+
0.78
ECRIS performance vs. Bmin/BECR
Previously unpublished
SuSI 18 GHz Xe35+
0.80
ECRIS performance vs. Bmin/BECR
O. Tarvainen, J. Laulainen, J. Komppula, R. Kronholm, T.Kalvas, H. Koivisto, I. Izotov, D. Mansfeld and V. Skalyga, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86, 023301, (2015).
JYFL 14 GHz A-ECR O5+
0.70
ECRIS performance vs. Bmin/BECR
0.7 – 0.8
What limits the ECRIS performance at ?
ECRIS performance vs. Bmin/BECR
A clue from the temporal stability of the extracted beam current (JYFL 14 GHz A-ECR)
Below the optimum Bmin/BECR Above the optimum Bmin/BECR
ECRIS performance vs. Bmin/BECR
A clue from the temporal stability of the extracted beam current (SuSI 18 GHz)
Below the optimum Bmin/BECR Above the optimum Bmin/BECR
Xe35+
Xe35+
Periodic oscillations of the beam current
Periodic oscillations of the beam current
30 Hz – 1.4 kHz
1 – 65 %
What causes the beam current oscillations?
Content
ECRIS magnetic field configuration and semiempirical scaling laws
Instabilities in ECRIS plasmas
Experimental setup and diagnostics signals
Instabilities limiting ECRIS performance
Electron velocity distribution in ECRIS
Resonant heating
Anisotropic EVDF due to hot electron population with v > v||
Electron energy distribution in ECRIS
Kinetic instabilities!
Cold (non-relativistic) electrons
Warm and hot electrons carrying most of the plasma energy
Fingerprints of electron cyclotron instabilities
Hot electrons interacting with the excited plasma wave
Bursts of microwave emission and hot electrons from the plasma
S.A. Hokin, R.S. Post, and D.L. Smatlak, Phys. Fluids B: Plasma Physics 1, 862 (1989).
M. Viktorov, D. Mansfeld and S. Golubev, EPL, 109 (2015), 65002.
Content
ECRIS magnetic field configuration and semiempirical scaling laws
Instabilities in ECRIS plasmas
Experimental setup and diagnostics signals
Instabilities limiting ECRIS performance
Experimental setup – JYFL 14 GHz ECRIS (A-ECR)
6
4 3
85
7
7 7
21
1. Injection coil 2. Extraction coil3. PM hexapole4. Plasma chamber5. Waveguides6. Extraction7. Pumping8. Radial viewport
Experimental setup – diagnostics
10 MHz – 50 GHz microwave detector diode connected to WR-75 waveguide
WR-75 ’diagnostics port’
Biased disc
Experimental setup – diagnostics
BGO scintillator + PMT measuring bremstrahlung power flux
6
4 3
8
5
7
7 7
21
B GO
120
mm
PMT(a) (b)
biased di sc
WR62
WR75 (d iagnostic port)
visible l ight diagnostic s port
Experimental setup – diagnosticsFaraday cup 5 m downstream in the beam line
Solenoid
Dipole magnet Steering magnet
Faraday Cup
JYFL 14 GHz ECRIS
20 mm collimator
Typical diagnostics signals
Further details on the microwave emission in the poster by Ivan Izotov
Note different time scales!
Why we observe a perturbation of the beam current?
Biased disc current with -150 V applied voltage
0.2 mA
-22 mA electron peak
14 mA ion peak
Transient current 100 x steady-state current!
Why we observe a perturbation of the beam current?
Biased disc current with -150 V applied voltage
Electron losses overcome the ion losses for 1 µs
Build-up of significant plasma potential
Ion beam energy spreadFaraday cup 5 m downstream in the beam line
Solenoid
Dipole magnet Steering magnet
Faraday Cup
JYFL 14 GHz ECRIS
20 mm collimator
Ramp the dipole current
I(t,B)
Ion beam energy spread
Peaks in m/q spectrum overlap following an instability event
10% energy spread equals to 1 kV plasma potential
Content
ECRIS magnetic field configuration and semiempirical scaling laws
Instabilities in ECRIS plasmas
Experimental setup and diagnostics signals
Instabilities limiting ECRIS performance
When do the instabilities occur and limit the ECRIS performance
(current and stability)?
Electron cyclotron instabilities
The energy of the microwave emission, Eµ, is described by mode- dependent growth and damping rates, and
Exponential growth of the instability amplitude when >
Threshold between stable and unstable regimes
is proportional to the anisotropy of the EVDF
is proportional to the (inelastic) electron collision frequency
Transition from stable to unstable regime
Transition from stable to unstable regime
Beam current oscillations in unstable regime
Instabilities limiting the source perfomance
Solid symbols: stable operating regimeOpen symbols: unstable operating regime
Instabilities limiting the source perfomance
Solid symbols: stable operating regimeOpen symbols: unstable operating regime
Instabilities limit the parameter space available for optimizing the extracted currents of high charge states!
Instabilities limiting the source perfomance
Temporal evolution of O6+ ion current in stable (red) and unstable (black) regime
Repetition rate of the periodic instabilities
Production of highly charged ions:
Good confinement
High microwave power
Low neutral gas pressure
Ionization times vs. instabilities
Ion current rise times (ionization + confinement) are on the order of 10 ms for high charge states (e.g. > Ar8+)R. C. Vondrasek, R. H. Scott, R. C. Pardo, and D. Edgell, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73, 548 (2002).
Typical repetition rate of the instabilities is 1 kHz which corresponds to 1 ms temporal interval
Ions must survive 10 instability events in order to become highly charged!
10 ms
1 ms
Do all ECRISs suffer from electron cyclotron instabilities?
VENUS: studying plasma-microwave coupling
Peaks of microwave emission coincident with dropping beam current (poor resolution)
Do all ECRIS suffer from electron cyclotron instabilities?
14.5 GHz PHOENIX charge breeder at LPSC
Periodic ripple of beam current and bursts of bremsstrahlung
Microwave emission coincident with the leading edge of the burst of bremsstrahlung emission
+ +
Why is Bmin/BECR linked to instabilities?
Electron heating is a stochastic process.
The energy gain / resonance pass is proportional to
Electric field amplitude at the resonance
… and inversely proportional to the
Parallel component of the magnetic field gradient
at the resonance.
Unstable
Why is Bmin/BECR linked to instabilities?
JYFL 14 GHz ECRIS
Bmin/BECR = 0.66 Bmin/BECR = 0.73 Bmin/BECR = 0.80
Stable
How to prevent instabilities?
Minimize the zero gradient regions on the ECR-surface?
Are those regions important or is all the action on axis?
To be studied with a superconducting ECRIS
How to prevent instabilities?
Single frequency heating
Two frequency heating
Stabilizing effect of two-frequency heating is related to the suppression of electron cyclotron instabilities
Further details in poster by V. Skalyga
“Tuning an ECR ion source is searching for an island of stability in a sea of turbulence”
- R. Geller
Thank you for your attention
Future plans
A study of instabilities vs. gas mixing
Measurement of the ion beam energy spread in unstable operation mode together with estimating the electron charge repelled by the instability
Better understanding of the two-frequency stabilization