life project number life12 nat/cy/000758 final report ... · the protocol can be found in annex...
TRANSCRIPT
(Projects submitting final reports after 1 January 2014 must use this format.)
LIFE Project Number
LIFE12 NAT/CY/000758
FINAL Report
Covering the project activities from 01/09/2013 to 28/02/2017
Reporting Date
28/02/2017
LIFE+ PROJECT NAME
LIFE-RIZOELIA: Improving the conservation status of the priority habitat
types *1520 and *5220 at the Rizoelia National Forest Park
Project Data
Project location Cyprus
Project start date: 01/09/2013
Project end date: 28/02/2017 Extension date: -
Total Project duration 42 months
Total budget € 766,746
Total eligible budget € 766,271
EU contribution: € 574,703
(%) of total costs 74,95%
(%) of eligible costs 75%
Beneficiary Data
Name Beneficiary Department of Forests, Cyprus
Contact person Mr Takis Tsintides
Postal address Loukis Akritas 26, 1414, Nicosia, Cyprus
Visit address Loukis Akritas 26, 1414, Nicosia, Cyprus
Telephone +35722805500
Fax: + 35722781419
E-mail [email protected]
Project Website http://www.life-rizoelia.eu/
2
Instructions:
The final report must be submitted to the Commission no later than 3 months after the project
end date.
One paper and one electronic version of the report is sufficient for the Commission. These
documents must be sent in identical versions also to the monitoring team. The report must
also be sent to the national authority.
Please refer to the Common Provisions annexed to your grant agreement for the contractual
requirements concerning a final report.
List of abbreviations
AB: Associate Beneficiaries
AEIC: Athalassa Environmental Information Centre
AGB: Above-Ground Biomass
BGB: Below-ground biomass
CB: Coordinating Beneficiary
DE: Department of Environment
DF: Department of Forests
EC: European Commission
EMT: External Monitoring Team
EU: European Union
FR: Final Report
FU: Frederick University
IAPS: Invasive Alien Plant Species
IPCC: Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change
IR: Inception Report
MR: Midterm Report
NCU: Nature Conservation Unit
OUC: Open University of Cyprus
PFM: Project Financial Manager
PM: Project Manager
PMT: Project Management Team
PMTL: Project Management Team Leader
PR: Progress Report
RFS: Rizoelia Forest Station
RNFP: Rizoelia National Forest Park
SC: Scientific Committee
SCo: Scientific Coordinator
SDF: Standard Data Form
ShC: Stakeholder Committee
TESSA: Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-based Assessment
TG: Temperate grassland
TSW: Temperate scrub/woodland
3
1. List of contents
2. Executive Summary (maximum 5 pages)
The project titled ‘Improving the conservation status of the priority habitat types *1520
and *5220 at the Rizoelia National Forest Park’ (acronym LIFE-RIZOELIA, LIFE12
NAT/CY/000758), aimed to promote and enable the long term conservation of the habitat
types ‘*5220 – Arborescent matorrals with Ziziphus’ and ‘*1520 – Gypsum steppes
(Gypsophiletalia)’ in Cyprus, by quantifying and halting natural and anthropogenic
pressures and threats that contribute to the long term degradation of these habitats. The
project was implemented within Rizoelia National Forest Park (RNFP), of which the
greatest part (92.3%) is included in the Natura 2000 Network (CY6000006 – Ethniko
Dasiko Parko Rizoelias). The project has been successfully completed within foreseen
timeframe, i.e. from September 2013 – February 2017.
The project was efficiently and timely implemented, according to the project’s approved
work plan, without substantial divergences from the initial proposal. The successful
implementation of the project was based on the efficient management of the project at the
administrative level by the Project Management Team (PMT). The ‘Project Management
Manual’ (IR - Annex 7.2.7) and the ‘Project Financial Management Guide’ (IR – Annex
7.5.7) contributed to the sound management of the project. The operation of the PMT,
having the advice of the Stakeholders Committee (ShC) and the Scientific Committee
(SC), secured the effective cooperation among all beneficiaries for the successful
implementation of the project.
Regarding the technical part of the project, all Preparatory Actions (Actions A) were
completed successfully. There was a small delay (no more than two months the maximum)
on the implementation of Actions A.2, A.4 and A.5, which however had no impact neither
on the progress of the project nor to its budget or objectives. The reason of the delay, in
each case, is explained in detail in the technical part of the current report. Preparatory
actions provided the necessary information to the beneficiaries in order to properly
implement the conservation actions. The outcomes of the Preparatory Actions are:
• Four high resolution color maps presenting habitat types within RNFP, distribution of
Acacia saligna and Oxalis pes – caprae and proposed locations for ‘C’ actions –
Action A.1.
• A Report on population structure of the priority habitat type *1520 – Action A.2.
• Two Monitoring Plans (one for each habitat type) – Action A.3.
• Two Management Plans (one for each habitat type) – Action A.4.
• Two Action Plans (one for each habitat type) – Action A.5.
• A Feasibility study on *5220 habitat re-creation – Action A.5.
• Expansion of the targeted Natura 2000 site and update of the Standard Data Form
(SDF).
4
All Conservation Actions (Actions C) have been successfully implemented according to
the proposal of the project, as well as following the guidelines of the deliverables of the
preparatory actions, or the suggestions of the SC. The outcomes of the Conservation
Actions are:
• Soft-fencing of 1300 m for the demarcation of habitat type *1520 in selected areas –
Action C.1, successfully limiting the illegal passing of vehicles within the habitat area.
• Treatment of more than 10000 stems of Acacia saligna, within an area of 6,8 ha (42%
of the total distribution area of Acacia in RNFP) for the control of this Invasive Alien Plant
Species (IAPS). Both the number of individuals treated and the coverage of the area
exceeded the foreseen numbers according to the initial proposal of the project – Action
C.2.
• 26900 m2 of dry herbaceous vegetation was cleared and 36000 m2 of fire traces
(clearings using agricultural tractor) were created on parts of the perimeter of RNFP for
fire prevention – Action C.4.
• Closure of 3,4 km (1 km was foreseen in the project proposal) of road network to limit
public access for fire prevention – Action C.4. This measure successfully limit vehicle
access to specific areas.
• Production of 2900 saplings of Ziziphus lotus, 1008 saplings of Asparagus horridus,
1010 saplings of Phagnalon rupestre, 598 saplings of Thymbra capitata and 660 saplings
of Noaea mucronata for the needs of Actions C.3 and C.6 – Action C.5.
• Dispersal of 13000 seeds of Gypsophila linearifolia, 1100 seeds of Campanula
fastigiata and 9000 seeds of Herniaria hemistemon for the restoration and enhancement of
habitat type *1520 – Action C.3. Enhancement took place in three localities covering 0,46
ha in total (0,1 ha was foreseen in the project proposal). Restoration took place in two
localities, covering an area of 0,56 ha (0,1 ha was foreseen in the project proposal).
• Planting of 815 saplings (541 Ziziphus lotus, 115 Asparagus horridus, 45 Noaea
mucronata, 39 Thymbra capitata and 75 Phagnalon rupestre saplings) for the restoration
of habitat type *5220 – Action C.3. Final success rate (percentage of established plants in
the field) was 29,4% for Ziziphus lotus, 28,7% for Asparagus horridus, 60% for Noaea
mucronata, 79,5% for Thymbra capitata and 92% for Phagnalon rupestre, contributing
towards the successful restoration of 1,97 ha of *5220 habitat type.
• Planting of 2085 plants (1194 Ziziphus lotus, 366 Asparagus horridus, 141 Noaea
mucronata, 156 Thymbra capitata and 228 Phagnalon rupestre saplings) for the re-
creation of habitat type *5220 – Action C.6. Final success rate was 30,7% for Ziziphus
lotus, 56,3% for Asparagus horridus, 87,9% for Noaea mucronata, 98,1% for Thymbra
capitata and 92,1% for Phagnalon rupestre, contributing towards the successful re-
creation of 1,95 ha of *5220 habitat type.
Regarding the Monitoring of the impact of the project actions, the progress of the
Conservation Actions was monitored and evaluated by the Project Manager (PM) and the
SC, based on the ‘Conservation Monitoring Protocol’ (Action D.1). The final evaluation of
the Protocol can be found in Annex 7.1.12. A study on the impacts of the project on the
local economy and the ecosystems services was carried out (Action D.2). The Rapid
Appraisal analysis of TESSA toolkit revealed that the most important ecosystem services
supported by the study area are: i. Nature-based recreation and ii. Carbon related services
5
involved in the Global Climate Regulation. Moreover, a short questionnaire of 12
questions with c.20 min duration about perception and attitudes of the local population
towards the conservation activities and Natura 2000 sites was created as a basis for
information collection from the urban areas around the park. Although many of the
respondents had heard of the N2K network (49%), they were uncertain about its aims and
role in nature conservation (70% of the respondents). The overall majority of the
respondents (95%) believe that there are multiple benefits in nature conservation, and the
majority (73%) does not think that nature conservation imposes too many restrictions on
land development. 79% of the respondents welcomed the proposed changes carried out by
the LIFE-RIZOELIA project, regarding visitor related infrastructure and public awareness.
The Public awareness and dissemination of results Actions (Actions E) were properly
implemented according to the initial proposal of the project. All dissemination actions
followed the foreseen schedule of the project. The following activities contributed to the
dissemination of the project’s outcomes:
• Publication of five press releases – Action E.1.
• Publication of five articles in newspaper/magazines – Action E.1.
• Implementation of two Local Workshops in Aradippou Municipality – Action E.1.
• Installation of four habitat information boards – Action E.1.
• Installation of four notice boards – Action E.1.
• Publication of three newsletters – Action E.1.
• Publication of a project’s leaflet – Action E.1.
• Development of project’s website – Action E.2.
• Production of promotion material (hats and pens) – Action E.2
• Participation in eight scientific conferences – Action E.3.
• Publication of Layman’s Report – Action E.4.
Furthermore, some outside LIFE activities took place regarding conservation actions and
dissemination of the project’s actions and results which however did not affect its progress
or budget. These activities are:
• Mapping of all habitat types, including plantations, within RNFP (not only targeted
habitat types) – Action A.1.
• Mapping of Oxalis pes – caprae – Action A.1.
• Pilot control of Oxalis pes – caprae – Action C.2.
• Estimation of Acacia saligna seed bank in RNFP – Action C.2.
• Stakeholders participated on 9/2/2016 in re-creation activities of the habitat type
*5220 in Alona area – Action C.6.
• Production and dissemination of a flyer – Action E.1.
• Publication of two more articles and press releases – Action E.1.
• Promotion of the Final Info-Day through the media – Action E.1.
• Participation in four more scientific conferences – Action E.3.
• Presentation of the project in the Mediterranean Kick off Seminar through the Natura
2000 Seminars of the Mediterranean Biogeographical Region on 26th-28th May 2014
– Action F.5.
6
• Participation of the LIFE-RIZOELIA project at the Green Week Satellite Event and at
the European Natura 2000 Day organized in Cyprus in 2015 and at the Final Info Day
of the LIFE+ project JUNIPERCY.
• Co-organization, with other LIFE projects implementing in Cyprus, of the ‘LIFE
Nature Platform Meeting on the management of Mediterranean habitat’ on 9-10
October 2014 at Polis Chrysochous.
• Co-organization with LIFE-FORBIRDS project of an event celebrating the European
Natura 2000 Day on 21/5/2016 in Cyprus.
In conclusion, the project successfully:
• minimized the threats of habitat fragmentation, fire, competitive vegetation,
extended road network and leisure activities on the targeted habitat types
• precisely mapped all habitat types within RNFP
• determined and describe the composition and structure of habitat type *1520 in
Cyprus
• expanded the Natura 2000 site ‘Ethiko Dasiko Parko Rizoelias’
• contributed to the long-term conservation of the targeted habitats
• identified the most important ecosystem services provided by the Park.
Referring to the financial part of the project, the project covered the 98.8% of the total
budget of €766,746.
The FR is accompanied by 34 annexes, of which 16 are deliverables of the project and 18
are additional files with information on the project’s progress.
3. Introduction (1 page) The project titled 'Improving the conservation status of the priority habitat types *1520
and *5220 at the Rizoelia National Forest Park' (LIFE12 NAT/CY/000758) has been
implemented within the framework of LIFE+ program of the European Union (EU). The
primary aim of the project was to promote and enable the long-term conservation of the
habitat types '*5220 - Arborescent matorrals with Ziziphus' and '*1520 - Gypsum steppes
(Gypsophiletalia)' in Cyprus, by quantifying and halting natural and anthropogenic
pressure and threats that contribute to the long-term degradation of these habitats. The
project was carried out within Rizoelia National Forest Park, of which the greatest part is
included in the Natura 2000 Network (CY6000006 – Ethniko Dasiko Parko Rizoelias).
The specific objectives of the project were:
• To contribute to the consolidation and dissemination of a knowledge base for the
protection, restoration, monitoring and evaluation of targeted priority habitat types,
• To increase habitat connectivity for arborescent matorral with Ziziphus (*5220),
• To reduce the risk of fire affecting both targeted priority habitat types,
• To eradicate competitive vegetation for both priority habitats and
• To manage leisure activities and accessibility in the park in a favourable manner to the
conservation of the priority habitats.
The main stakeholders affected from the current project are the park visitors, the local
authorities and local people. The visitors of the habitat areas have been informed about the
habitat’s value and the undertaken conservation efforts through the dissemination material
of the project, as well as the Notice Boards and the Habitat Information Boards. A socio-
7
economic study, prepared by the end of the project, documented the positive effects of the
project on the local people and the local economy as well as on the ecosystem services of
the targeted site. The results corroborated the importance of RNFP for ecosystem services
provision in addition to biodiversity support, with direct and indirect benefits to the local
community. The implementation of TESSA Toolkit revealed that RNFP supports climate
regulation services (global climate, local climate and air quality); and recreation and
aesthetic benefits. Moreover, questionnaire survey revealed that although that the public
knows of the concept, understands restrictions imposed by, and dangers to nature
conservation from development, however, many are not still aware of the mission and
vision of Natura 2000 sites nationally.
The expected results achieved by the project are:
• The consolidation and dissemination of knowledge on:
- The composition and structure of habitat type *1520.
- The anthropogenic impact on the ecological conditions of both targeted habitats
(*5220 and *1520).
- The effective participation and governance methods for the conservation of the
targeted habitat types.
- The effective monitoring and conservation methods through the elaboration of
management plans, action plans and monitoring plans.
• The habitat demarcation and detailed mapping of the targeted habitat types,
• The restoration of 1,97 ha of habitat type *5220,
• The restoration and enhancement of habitat type *1520 (0,56 ha and 0,46 ha,
respectively),
• The re-creation of habitat type *5220 (1,95 ha) and
• The expansion of the Natura 2000 site ‘CY6000006 - Ethniko Dasiko Parko Rizoelias’
and the update of the respective SDF.
4. Administrative part (maximum 3 pages)
4.1 Description of the management system
The Coordinating Beneficiary (CB) and Associate Beneficiaries (AB) covered all aspects
of the project’s managerial needs by assigning explicit roles and obligations to team
members based on their available personnel, skills and experience. A balanced workload
for each one was planned in order to assure optimal quality of results, time management
and budget control. PMT had the overall control of the project implementation and
project beneficiaries’ obligations and activities were well described in the Project
Management Manual. The personnel of each beneficiary that has worked on the project
during the reporting period is presented in Annex 7.2.1 of this report: List of personnel
involved in the project.
The project was divided into two phases (Fig. 1): The preparatory phase (including the
activities from Actions A.1-A.5) and the conservation phase (including the activities from
Actions C.1-C.6). Project monitoring activities (Actions D.1, D.2 and F.2), management
activities (Actions F.1, F.3-F.6), public awareness and dissemination of results (Actions
E.1-E.4) started from the beginning of the project and most of them lasted until the very
end.
8
Figure 1. Workflow and management chart.
The CB of the project was the Department of Forests (DF) of the Ministry of
Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment, the competent authority for both the
management of state forest land and the implementation of national forest legislation and
policy. Moreover, it is the competent authority for the Natura 2000 sites within state
forest land.
Three more partners contributed to the implementation of the LIFE-RIZOELIA project:
- Department of Environment, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and
Environment (DE).
- Frederick University: Nature Conservation Unit (NCU) of Frederick University.
- Open University of Cyprus (OUC): The Terrestrial Ecosystems Management Lab of
OUC.
The project’s organigram has been fully developed, according to the project proposal.
The management structure was formed by three distinct levels:
• The Administration Level: Administration and coordination of the project
implementation was covered by the PMT. The PMT was also responsible for the
overall monitoring of the project.
• The Advisory Level: This is covered by the SC and ShC (Actions F.3 and F.4). The
aim of the two committees was to empower the scientific support of the project and to
enhance the participation and collaboration of all possible stakeholders who may be
interested in the project’s actions and results.
• The Implementation Level: This level involved the project partners that actively
support the project through the work of their staff and partners and aimed to achieve
all task and objectives, as described in the initial project proposal.
9
Day-to-day management and project coordination was carried out by the PMT, as stated
above. The members of the PMT and the members of ShC were detailed described in MR
(#4.1).
The PM and the PMTL in order to organise and co-ordinate the implementation of the
project arrange several meetings and contacts with the project partners (Administration
Level). Specifically:
- In order to ensure the smooth start of the project, the CB arranged a preliminary
meeting before the official start with the AB of the project on 27/08/2013 at the
premises of the DF.
- Five more official meetings of the partners took place on 26/09/2013 at Rizoelia
National Forest Park (RNFP), on 13/02/2014 at DF, on 17/07/2014 at RNFP, on
08/09/2014, 04/02/2015, 14/01/2016 and 27/09/2016 at DF.
- Several unofficial meetings have taken place between the PM and the PMTL, or the
PM with the representatives of each partner.
- The Project Management Manual, which was prepared at the beginning of the project
was an additional tool to the sound management of the project (see I.R., #5.1.18).
- The PFM has prepared the Project Financial Management Guide, as an auxiliary tool
for handling economic issues of the project. A Financial Management Team has been
established, consisting of the PFM and a representative of each project partner.
Moreover, the PM was in continuous contact (at least once a week) either by email or by
telephone with Mr. Charalambos Christodoulou (DF), Mrs Anna Savvides (DE) and Dr.
Paraskevi Manolaki (OUC) regarding running issues of the project implementation
(Implementation Level).
As regards the Advisory Level, all foreseen project activities have been implemented:
- The 1st official meeting of the SC was held in the premises of the DF on 06/02/2014.
They had the opportunity to get informed on the project goals and actions. The
members of the SC visited the project area on 07/02/2014. The external scientific
experts have given instructions and directions on scientific aspects of the work
undertaken for this project (see I.R., Annex 7.2.8).
- The 1st official meeting of the stakeholders took place at the Rizoelia Forest Station on
28/01/2014. The ShC was nominated during this meeting. The role of the ShC was to
assist the project by providing necessary support and guidance to overcome external,
political, administrative, and managerial issues that may arise. The ShC had also an
advisory role on all administrative and technical matters with specific emphasis on
the information campaign and the relations with local people and groups of interest.
During the first meeting of the ShC, the stakeholders were informed on the targeted
habitat types, the main aims of the project and the project actions. The stakeholders
were interested in the actions for the conservation of the two habitat types, especially
of 5220* habitat type since this is well known to occur at the area. The stakeholders
stated the significance of Ziziphus lotus shrubs and their fruits for people and fauna
during the past, and reported that the reduction of the species stands has been
obvious, over the last decades. They agreed with the foreseen conservation measures
of the project and argued that during the re-creation or enhancement of the habitat,
plantations of other species like thyme (Thymbra capitata) will improve not only the
flora of the area but also the fauna. They also referred to the need for elimination of
Acacia saligna, whose invasion is obvious in the RNFP. The minutes of the meeting
can be found in Annex 7.2.9 of IR.
- The 2nd meeting of the ShC took place at the Rizoelia Forest Station (RFS) on
11/11/2014. Stakeholders were updated on the project progress. The meeting included
10
touring of the ShC members within RNFP in order to see the progress of the
conservation actions such as the control of Acacia saligna and the enhancement of the
two priority habitat types, in place. The stakeholders made specific comments on the
conservation actions of the project. Specifically, they suggest to carefully shape the
basin of the planted saplings in order to collect as much water as possible during
rainfall and to plant local species during the restoration of 5220* habitat type. Both
comments have been seriously considered by the project beneficiaries. Additionally,
they were informed on the dissemination activities and they also saw the boards
which were ready to be established in RNFP. The minutes of the meeting can be
found in Annex 7.2.14 of MR.
- An unofficial meeting of the SC took place on 14-15/01/2015 during the experts’
workshop. During the workshop, they had the opportunity to be informed on the
project progress. The proceedings of the workshop can be found in Annex 7.2.3 of
MR.
- The 3rd meeting of the ShC took place on 20/10/2015. Stakeholders were updated on
the project progress since their last meeting a year ago. The meeting included touring
of the ShC members within the RNFP in order to see the progress of the conservation
actions such as the enhancement of the two priority habitat types and the re-creation
of *5220 habitat type, in place. During the meeting, the stakeholders made specific
comments on the conservation actions of the project. Specifically, they suggest
several ways in order to overcome the high mortality of Ziziphus lotus saplings, either
in the nurseries or in the field, i.e. to try producing saplings through asexual
reproduction (i.e. by cuttings), establishing saplings in places with high soil moisture,
planting seeds in the field without the hard coat (only the embryo) (this is one of the
methods employed in the nursery) etc. The PMTL (Mr Takis Tsintides) mentioned
that this may be the strategy of the specific species and the results, either in the
nurseries or the field, might be more than enough. The above suggestions are outside
of the current project’s activities. However, the project partners tried to investigate
some of them using their own time and budget. The minutes of the meeting can be
found in Annex 7.1.1 of PR.
- The 2nd official SC was held at the premises of the DF on 11-12 April 11 2016, with
the participation of the members of the SC, as well as the personnel from associated
beneficiaries directly involved in the project. A detailed overview of the project’s
progress for all Actions (A, C, D, E, and F) was given by the SCo Dr. Ioannis
Vogiatzakis during the first day of the meeting. During the meeting, the Conservation
Monitoring Protocol was assessed by the external experts (time was given to the
experts to send any comments at a later stage). Following the discussion in the office,
the participants had the opportunity to visit the RNFP where they had the chance to
see the project area and the implementation of the concrete conservation actions.
During the 2nd day, participants had the opportunity to visit various locations within
the districts of Larnaca and Nicosia where Ziziphus lotus is found principally in
isolated individuals surrounded by an agriculture matrix/landscapes. The minutes of
the meeting can be found in Annex 7.2.2 of this report.
- The 4th meeting of the ShC took place at the RFS on 01/11/2016. Stakeholders were
informed on the outcomes of the project versus the expected results indicated in the
project proposal. During the meeting, the PM referred to the contribution of the
member of the ShC and the Municipality of Aradippou to the implementation of the
project. Finally, the stakeholders discussed about the organization of the Final Info-
Day during the last month of the project and explored ways to attract the local people
11
to participate to the event. The minutes of the meeting can be found in Annex 7.2.3 of
this report.
Within the framework of the Overall project operation and monitoring of the project
progress (Actions F), Networking with other LIFE and/or non-LIFE projects was
included (Action F.5). The action brought together scientists from similar projects, i.e
LIFE04 NAT/CY/000013 (Conservation management in NATURA 2000 sites of Cyprus)
and LIFE00 NAT/E/007304 (Cabo de Gata - Improvement of the management of the SCI
and SPA 'Cabo de Gata-Níjar'). Unfortunately, there was no response from scientists of
the project LIFE03 NAT/E/000059 (Hábitats N-E Murcia - Integral management of the
habitats of Northwest region of the Murcia Province), despite the repeated efforts of the
SCo in collaboration with the member of the SC Dr. Reyees Tirado. Therefore, only one
visit of the project partners abroad took place. The LIFE-RIZOELIA team (Andreas
Nearchou – DF, Constantinos Kounnamas - FU) visited Almeria on 15-18 December
2015. OUC could not participate in this visit at the selected dates. The visit was hosted by
Dr. Francisco Javier Cabello Piñar (University of Almeria), and was also facilitated by
the Oficina Administrativa Del Parque Natural Cabo de Gata-Níjar. The LIFE-
RIZOELIA team visited LIFE00 NAT/E/007304 targeted areas, where concrete
conservation actions implemented. The report from the visits of team members to similar
projects areas can be found in Annex 7.2.2 of MR. Within the framework of the same
action, an experts’ workshop was organised and successfully implemented on 14-15
January 2015. During the first day, a workshop on ‘The impact of climate change on
priority habitat types’ viability’, took place at the premises of the Ministry of Agriculture,
Rural Development and Environment. The second day, included visit of the experts at
RNFP, in order to get familiar with the results of the actions which have been
implemented or those which are in progress. The workshop was attended by 45
participants, including the three experts of the SC, two external experts (Dr. Salvatore
Pasta and Dr. Costas Thanos) and two experts from Cyprus (Dr. Panos Hadjinicolaou and
Mrs Kyriaki Ioannou). Initially, four external experts were invited and accepted to
participate in the workshop. Unfortunately, there was a last-minute cancelation of two
experts (Kyriacos Georgiou and Javier Cabello), which they were replaced by the two
experts from Cyprus, without affecting the scientific quality of the workshop. The
proceedings of the workshop, the invitation, the agenda and the list of participants can be
found in Annex 7.2.3 of MR.
Action F6 (After-LIFE Conservation Plan) started implementing during the final stage of
the project (from November 2016). The Plan describes the activities foreseen to be
undertaken after the end of the project, the timeframe, the budget and the responsible
beneficiary in order to secure the long-term conservation of the targeted habitat types.
The deliverable can be found in Annex 7.3.2 of this report.
Within the framework of the Overall project operation and monitoring of the project
progress (Actions F) 11 deliverables of LIFE-RIZOELIA project were foreseen to be
prepared:
- Project Management Manual (see I.R., Annex 7.2.7)
- Project Monitoring Protocol (see MR, Annex 7.2.4). The updated table of Project
Monitoring Protocol, presenting the final assessment of the indicators can be found in
Annex 7.2.13 of this report.
- Minutes of the 1st meeting of the SC (see I.R., Annex 7.2.8)
- Minutes of the 2nd meeting of the SC (see Annex 7.2.2 of this report)
- Minutes of the 1st meeting of the ShC (see I.R., Annex 7.2.9)
- Minutes of the 2nd meeting of the ShC (see MR, Annex 7.2.14)
12
- Minutes of the 3rd meeting of the ShC (see PR, Annex 7.1.1)
- Minutes of the 4th meeting of the ShC (see Annex 7.2.3 of this report)
- Proceedings of the expert’s workshop (see MR, Annex 7.2.3)
- Report from the visits of team members to similar projects areas (see MR, Annex
7.2.2)
- After-LIFE Conservation Plan (see Annex 7.3.2 of this report).
The Partnership Agreement was signed by the CB and the AB on 14.10.2013 and was
submitted to the EC with the IR. No changes have been made to the Grant Agreement.
4.2 Evaluation of the management system
The PMT has been characterized by excellent collaboration during the implementation of
the project. The PMTL along with the PM organized and monitored the timely
implementation of project activities and evaluate the project progress in collaboration
with the SCo of the project. The project progress is shown in the Gantt chart (Annex 7.1.2
of this report). Moreover, the PFM monitored the financial documents of the project and
interfered whenever and wherever was necessary (please see #6). As a result, no
substantial problems have occurred. Furthermore, the close collaboration of the PMT
with the SC and ShC ensured the scientific quality of the project activities and the success
of the information campaign and the communication with the local people, respectively.
Two problems were raised during project implementation:
• No records on website visits for certain months. The issue was successfully met (see
#5.2.2.2).
• The low percentage of Ziziphus lotus seedlings production from seeds and the high
mortality of these seedlings in the nursery. The issue was also successfully met (see
#5.1.10 and Annex 7.1.1).
The PMT was engaged in an ongoing communication with the EMT, including the
transition of monthly reports for the project’s progress and also asking for guidance
regarding administrative and financial issues. All project reports have been sent to the
EMT, too.
5. Technical part (maximum 50 pages)
5.1. Technical progress, per task
5.1.1. Action A.1: Detailed mapping of the distribution of the targeted habitat
types and the locations where conservation activities will take place
Status: COMPLETED
Foreseen start date:
01/09/2013
Actual start date:
01/09/2013
Foreseen end date:
30/06/2014
Actual end date:
30/06/2014
The first preparatory Action focused on:
- the detailed mapping of the exact boundaries of the targeted habitat types *1520 and
*5220 within Rizoelia area,
- the identification and mapping of IAPS and the proposal of locations where control
of invasive species have taken place (Action C.2).
13
- the identification of suitable locations regarding restoration activities (Action C.3
and C.6) of the targeted habitat types.
Action A.1 started from the beginning of the project and was completed as foreseen in
the project proposal. Please note that all habitat types were mapped within RNFP,
which did not affect either the deliverables, timetable or the overall EC contribution to
the project. Within the framework of this action, a GIS software package was
purchased by the DF in December 2013.
It should be mentioned that within the framework of this action, mapping of Oxalis
pes – caprae took place in March 2014. This invasive species, a persisting perennial
herb, occurs at several locations of RNFP, especially in disturbed areas. Mapping of
Oxalis pes –caprae was not foreseen in the project proposal (outside LIFE activity). It
was proposed by the external experts of the SC, after their first visit to the RNFP. Pilot
control of this IAPS (see Action C.2, #5.1.7) was also proposed by the SC.
The production of one 1:500 colour map was the main deliverable of Action A.1.
However, due to large amount of data, four large scale maps were produced (see
Annex 7.2.5 of MR). Specifically:
- Habitat types distribution map,
- Proposed locations for the implementations of "C" Actions map,
- Acacia saligna distribution map and
- Oxalis pes caprae distribution map.
The maps produced provided the necessary information for:
- Preparing (Action A.5) and implementing (Action C.3) the Action Plans,
- Preparing the Monitoring Plans (Action A.3),
- Preparing the Management Plans (Action A.4),
- Controlling/ minimizing competitive vegetation (Action C.2) and
- Indicating new locations for establishing Ziziphus lotus (Action C.6)
Furthermore, data acquired through Action A.1 was utilised for updating the SDF of
the Natura 2000 site ‘Ethniko Dasiko Parko Rizoelias’, including new areas
(expansion of the site). The new SDF (see Annex 7.2.4) was updated and preliminary
approved in October 2016 by the Scientific Committee, which was set according to the
Law for the Protection and Management of Nature and Wildlife [153(I)2003] of
Cyprus. The new SDF has preliminary been forwarded to the EC by DE. A certain
period for consultation was given to interested parties to express their complaints or
objections. The consultation was completed and no changes to the SDF emerged. The
finalized SDF will be sent to EC (probably by the end of 2017), after the declaration of
Alona area (the expansion area) as State Forest land.
DF was the responsible beneficiary of this action. OUC, DE and DF involved in the
inventory of the targeted habitat types and mapping of their boundaries. DF produced
the maps. DE, with collaboration of DF, updated the SDF of the targeted Natura 2000
site.
14
5.1.2. Action A.2: Composition and structure of the priority habitat type *1520
Status: COMPLETED
Foreseen start date:
01/03/2014
Actual start date:
02/04/2014
Foreseen end date:
30/06/2014
Actual end date:
02/09/2014
Action A.2 started in early April 2014, instead of March 2014, simultaneously with
the mapping of habitat type *1520 (Action A.1). The appearance of the habitat’s
keystone species Gypsophila linearifolia and Campanula fastigiata, which are both
annual herbs, depends on the weather conditions which were favourable during April
2014. Within the framework of this action, 25 variable size plots have been established
in the field, based on environmental features (topography and elevation). All reference
plots were georeferenced using GIS. Basic environmental parameters (slope, aspect,
gradient, elevation, etc.) and vegetation cover (using the modified Braun-Blanquet 9-
grade cover-abundance scale) have been recorded.
This action’s deliverable was a ‘Report on population structure of the priority habitat
type *1520’ (Annex 7.2.6 of MR). The report provides information on the composition
and structure of the priority habitat type *1520 within the targeted Natura 2000 site
‘Ethniko Dasiko Parko Rizoelias’ (CY6000006) in Cyprus. Specifically, it provides
information on the composition and structure of *1520, the floristic list of the habitat
type 1520 at RNFP, the population size of the two keystone species of *1520
(Campanula fastigiata and Gypsophila linearifolia) and the threats which were
recorded. Raw data (field sheets in Greek language) is available in digital format, upon
request. The main findings of the report are:
- Keystone species for habitat type 1520* in Cyprus are the gypsophilous species
Campanula fastigiata and Gypsophila linearifolia.
- Other species participating in the composition of the habitat are Herniaria hemistemon
(Vulnerable), Thymbra capitata, Teucrium micropodiodes (Εndemic), Phagnalon
rupestre and Fumana thymifolia.
- Regarding its structure, the habitat is characterized by the presence of herbaceous
species and low shrubs with large bare soil exposures. Such scientific knowledge was
essential for taking the appropriate conservation measures for the targeted habitat
type.
FU was the responsible beneficiary of this action. FU was involved in the procedures
of delineation of the plots and acquiring of data on the targeted habitat composition
and structure. DF was involved in the collection of data. The analysis of vegetation
releves was carried out by the member of SC Prof. Panayiotis Dimopoulos.
The action was completed with a two months delay with no impact whatsoever on the
scientific quality of the deliverable or the project implementation. The completion of
the action depended on the availability of Prof. Dimopoulos to perform the vegetation
analysis, an activity that was not foreseen in the project proposal, which resulted in a
small delay.
15
5.1.3. Action A.3: Preparation of Monitoring Plans
Status: COMPLETED
Foreseen start date:
01/09/2013
Actual start date:
02/10/2013
Foreseen end date:
31/10/2014
Actual end date:
31/10/2014
The Action A.3 started in October 2013 and concluded in October 2014. It is
important to note that there were no standardised monitoring protocols/methods for the
habitat type *1520, neither appropriate baseline data available for the targeted site. A
monitoring plan already existed for the habitat *5220 but only for the Kavo Gkreko
site. The existing monitoring plan was adapted accordingly for the targeted Natura
2000 site.
The action started with data collection and literature review on the habitat types *1520
and *5220. The table of contents has been reviewed by the external experts of the SC.
The elaboration of the monitoring plans utilized the results of Actions A.1, A.2 and
A.4.
Two Monitoring Plans were the deliverables of this action (see Annex 7.2.7 of MR).
The Monitoring Plans aimed at (i) assessing the conservation status of the targeted
habitat types, (ii) setting specific monitoring objectives and (iii) selecting the
appropriate qualitative and quantitative parameters of monitoring. The plans included
updated information on the targeted habitat types (general description, geographical
distribution, threats, conservation status, protection status etc); specific parameters to
be monitored (mapping, population density, habitat monitoring, threats); and
bibliography. The implementation of the Monitoring Plans at the end of the project is
expected to contribute towards adopting sound management measures for the
conservation of the targeted habitat types.
The preparation of monitoring plans concluded in September 2014 and they were
approved by the DF, the DE and the SC in October 2014. The letters of the official
approval of the Plans by DE and DF can be found in Annex 7.2.5.
FU was the responsible beneficiary of this action. DF and DE have critically reviewed
and approved the Monitoring Plans.
16
5.1.4. Action A.4: Preparation of Management Plans
Status: COMPLETED
Foreseen start date:
01/09/2013
Actual start date:
02/10/2013
Foreseen end date:
31/10/2014
Actual end date:
30/12/2014
The aim of this action was to develop complete and integrated Management Plans for
the priority habitat types located within the targeted site. Action A.4 started in October
2013 with data collection and concluded in December 2014 with the elaboration of
two Management Plans (see Annex 7.2.8 of MR). The elaboration of the management
plans utilized the results of Actions A.1, A.2 and A.3.
Both Management Plans aimed at (i) assessing the current status of the targeted habitat
type, (ii) setting specific management objectives for the targeted habitat type and (iii)
proposing sound management measures to promote the long-term conservation of the
habitat type *1520. Each plan also included updated information on the RNFP and the
targeted habitat type, threats and pressures for the habitat and bibliography.
The management measures included in the Plans are:
- Gradual removal of competing vegetation
- Protection against fires
- Management of visitors and recreation activities
- Expansion of habitat types *1520 and *5220
- Decrease *5220 habitat fragmentation.
Stakeholders Committee members critically reviewed and validated the two
management plans. Furthermore, the DF and the DE, taking into consideration the
views of the ShC and the SC, have approved the management plans. The letters of the
official approval of the Plans by DE and DF can be found in Annex 7.2.6. The
Management Plans became legally operational in October 2016 after their approval by
the Scientific Committee, which was set according to the Law for the Protection and
Management of Nature and Wildlife [Law 153(I)2003]. The minutes of this
Committee meeting can be found in Annex 7.2.7.
DF was the responsible beneficiary of this action. FU contributed to the collection of
bibliographical data and to the writing of the management plans. DF and DE have
critically reviewed and approved the Management Plans.
17
5.1.5. Action A.5: Preparation of Action Plans for the enhancement of the
targeted habitat types
Status: COMPLETED
Foreseen start date:
01/02/2014
Actual start date:
01/02/2014
Foreseen end date:
31/10/2014
Actual end date:
10/11/2014
Action A.5 implemented according to the project timeframe. The elaboration of two
Action Plans (Annex 7.2.9 of MR), one for each targeted habitat type, was the main
deliverable of this action. The two Plans were officially approved by the DF in June
2016 (see Annex 7.2.8). The two action plans constituted a guiding tool for the
enhancement of the targeted habitat types in RNFP through habitat restoration and re-
creation at selected locations of the project area. They provide general information on
the targeted habitat types, the methodology and time frame, as well as the foreseen
results of each activity. The implementation of the action plans through Actions ‘C’ of
the current project ensured the proper implementation of restoration and re-creation
activities mentioned in the project proposal and the successful conservation of the
targeted habitat types.
Furthermore, a feasibility study (Annex 7.2.10 of MR) has been prepared, identifying
all the obstacles to re-creation activities, knowledge gaps regarding the site,
information on status of the area including past and current management, species
composition and soils for the needs of Action C.6. The feasibility study provided
authorities, residents and stakeholders with information about the re-creation of the
habitat type *5220 in RNFP, at selected locations of the project area. It analysed the
methods which were implemented and discussed their necessity and limitations. The
key actions are described herein including important components of the selected
methods and the criteria for their selection.
During this action, the expert on IAPS, Dr Jean-Marc Dufour-Dror, visited RNFP and
trained 19 persons of the DF’s staff and 4 persons of the Nature Conservation Unit,
Frederick University on the appropriate methods of Acacia saligna control on 4-5
February 2014.
FU was the responsible beneficiary of this action. FU prepared the two action plans.
DF critically reviewed the action plans and organised the expert's visit in Cyprus.
OUC prepared the Feasibility Study.
18
5.1.6. Action C.1: On site habitat demarcation and fencing of gypsum steppes
*1520
Status: COMPLETED
Foreseen start date:
01/11/2014
Actual start date:
15/07/2014
Foreseen end date:
29/05/2015
Actual end date:
06/06/2016
The aim of this action was the demarcation of the habitat type *1520 at selected areas
through ‘Soft-fencing’. Action C.1 started earlier and completed one year after the
foreseen deadline (May 2016). The low rainfall of the years 2013 and 2014 resulted in
limited emergence of the two characteristic gypsophilous species. The DF taking into
account the occurrence of the two species during 2015, which was a rainy year, asked
for one year extension of the action. This request was approved by the EC, through the
official letter of EC, during the 2nd visit of the EMT on 27 April 2015 (Annex 7.1.2 of
MR).
In total, 1300 m of soft fencing were considered necessary and installed in specific
locations (Fig. 1) of the RNFP (2000 m of soft fencing was foreseen in the project
proposal). However, the area of habitat type *1520, which is now protected through
soft-fencing, is much more because soft-fencing exploited the relief of the area,
avoiding any unnecessary fencing within the Park. The selection of the areas took into
account the outcomes of Action A.1 and Action A.2. Moreover, the limit of vehicle
access on 3,4 km (more than the length foreseen in the proposal) of forest roads (see #
5.1.9) contributed also to the protection of *1520 habitat type. The exact locations and
the methodology for soft-fencing are analytically discussed in the ‘Action Plan for the
habitat type *1520: Gypsum steppes, at Rizoelia National Forest Park’ (see Annex
7.2.9 of MR).
Demarcation of selected areas successfully directed visitors towards specific trails and
discouraged visitor access in the targeted habitat type area using off-road vehicles,
thus limiting threats and impacts like littering, trampling and fires.
DF was the responsible beneficiary of this action.
Figure 1. Soft-fencing of *1520 habitat type at selected locations at Rizoelia National
Forest Park.
19
5.1.7. Action C.2: Minimizing the impact of competitive vegetation on priority
habitat types *5220 & *1520
Status: COMPLETED
Foreseen start date:
02/06/2014
Actual start date:
03/02/2014
Foreseen end date:
30/12/2016
Actual end date:
30/12/2016
Action C.2 started earlier than the timeframe set in the project proposal (mid-February
2014 instead of June 2014), taking into consideration the view of the expert on IAPS
and the SC. During the 1st SC meeting in February 2014, there was a site visit where
the vegetative condition of Acacia saligna was examined, revealing that it was already
forming flowering heads due to the warm weather, thus it was suggested by the SC
that that period (i.e. February 2014) was the most suitable for the effective control of
Acacia saligna.
The exact locations for controlling competitive vegetation were identified during the
visit of Dr Jean-Marc Dufour-Dror on 4-5 February 2014 and were confirmed during
the first meeting of the SC on 6-7 February 2014, taking into consideration the
outcomes of Action A.1 and experts’ opinion during field visit. Details regarding the
distribution of Acacia saligna, the control area and the methodology are being
presented in the maps prepared in Action A.1 (see Annex 7.2.5 of MR), in the two
management plans (Annex 7.2.8 of MR) and in the two action plans (Annex 7.2.9 of
MR), respectively. According to the project proposal, 500 Acacia saligna individuals,
covering a total area of 0.4 ha were expected to be treated. During the first year (2014)
approximately 1000 individuals (twice than planned) of Acacia saligna were treated
(Fig. 3) in an area larger than the expected area of treatment. During 2015, a follow-up
program (returning control actions) started to secure that in all treated individuals,
which they have been controlled, no re-sprouting or regeneration by seeds will take
place. Furthermore, the control of Acacia saligna was expanded to 6,8 ha in total (42%
of the total distribution area of Acacia in RNFP). More than 10000 stems of Acacia
saligna were treated up to June 2015. Returning control actions continued until
December 2016 for all the above area, securing that 100% of the stems have
successfully treated.
Conifers and Eucalyptus species do not act as IAPS. As expert on IAPS said
‘Eucalyptus individuals do not show any invasive pattern as only mature, planted trees
were observed. The habitat is probably too dry in order to enable spreading of new
individuals of eucalyptus. Only a dozen of Dodonaea viscosa individuals were spotted
in the field, so this species at this stage can only be considered as 'casual' in RNFP. All
Pinus trees found in the field were planted and Pinus species do not display any
invasive behaviour in the region studied.’ As the expert advised, the available
resources for invasive species control should allocated mainly to the control of Acacia
salilgna. However, the DF removed all Dodonaea viscosa and selected Yucca spp.
individuals during summer 2015 within RNFP and Alona area (near *5220 habitat re-
creation), respectively.
Prescribed burning was applied over an area of 1400 m2 in autumn 2015 at a position
with Acacia seeds in the soil (seed bank) to promote regeneration of Acacia (activation
of soil seed bank), aiming to control the young seedlings that emerge. The area was
treated (Acacia removal) in May 2015 (402 individuals were treated) before the
prescribed burning was applied. Seedling emergence was quite high, as approximately
3000 seedlings coming from seeds found in June 2016 and 2000 saplings from
regeneration. Both types of plantlets have been removed successfully by hand.
20
Moreover, during the first visit of the SC in February 2014, Oxalis pes –caprae was
also considered as IAPS. Oxalis pes-caprae populations were localized onto the most
fertile and disturbed soil and locally formed dense stands, crowding out native
herbaceous species. However, the main foci were observed in habitats were Ziziphus
lotus is found (*5220) rather than in the gypsum steppes (*1520) which is the habitat
with rare annual species. It was suggested by the SC that Oxalis pes –caprae should be
mapped within the Natura 2000 site ‘Ethniko Dasiko Parko Rizoelias’ (see Action
A.1, #5.1.1) and also to try to control this species at a pilot level. It was stressed that
the main problem in controlling the Bermuda buttercup is that only glyphosate
spraying can affect the plant, yet only temporarily as the stands may recover within a
two-year period. Mapping took place in March 2014 (see Action A.1, #5.1.1). Oxalis
pes – caprae pilot control (Fig. 3) started in February 2015. Part of the area of habitat
*5220 re-creation was selected to be controlled (3300 m2). This area was free from
natural vegetation as it was an abandoned field. Chemical treatment (glyphosate)
repeated three more times at different development stages of the species. The final
conclusion is that the control of Bermuda buttercup is quite difficult, needs repeated
spraying with glyphosate, a chemical medium that cannot applied in natural areas with
important habitat types and species. The above activities were not foreseen in the
project proposal (outside LIFE activities).
Another outside LIFE activity, carried out in June 2015, was the estimation of Acacia
saligna seed bank in RNFP. Several samples (25 x 25 cm) were taken from soil in
three layers: at the soil surface (0 cm), at 0-10 cm depth and at 10-20 cm depth, at
different canopy covers of Acacia saligna, according to the literature (Strydom et al.
2011.). The results are indicated in the Table 1. The average number of seeds per
square meter at the soil surface is estimated to be 1648 seeds, at 0-10 cm depth is 2160
seeds and at 10-20 cm is 400 seeds.
DF was the responsible beneficiary of this action.
Table 1. Number of Acacia saligna seeds at different samples and layers.
Sample
(0,25x0,25 m)
% canopy cover of Acacia
saligna Layer
0 cm 0-10 cm 10-20 cm
1
<50%
0 39 46
2 3 64 110
3 0 7 0
4 2 9 2
AVERAGE 1,3 29,8 39,5
Standard error 0,8 13,6 25,8
1
50%
3 3 0
2 0 1 0
3 23 19 0
4 252 311 0
AVERAGE 69,5 83,5 0,0
Standard error 61,0 75,9 0,0
1
75%
2 17 0
2 29 67 7
3 49 73 5
4 25 96 3
AVERAGE 26,3 63,3 3,8
21
Standard error 9,6 16,6 1,5
1
100%
82 472 87
2 399 413 44
3 456 210 43
4 320 360 55
AVERAGE 314,3 363,8 57,3
Standard error 82,3 56,1 10,3
Figure 2. Oxalis pes –caprae pilot control at Rizoelia National Forest Park.
Figure 3. Control of Acacia saligna.
22
5.1.8. Action C.3: Restoration of the targeted habitat types
Status: COMPLETED
Foreseen start date:
02/10/2014
Actual start date:
15/07/2014
Foreseen end date:
28/02/2017
Actual end date:
28/02/2017
This action focused on the restoration of the habitat types *1520 and *5220 by
applying in situ and inter situ conservation measures. Action C.3 started earlier than
the timeframe set in the project proposal (mid July 2014 instead of October 2014).
Preliminary activities such as ground preparation (i.e. garbage removal and mild
pruning of shrubs as needed) for habitat restoration started in July 2014 at the
proposed locations for restoration, indicated in the ‘Action Plan for the habitat type
*5220: Arborescent matorral with Ziziphus, at Rizoelia National Forest Park’.
Within the framework of this action:
- Three restoration sites of *5220 habitat type have been created, 1,97 ha in total (1 ha
was foreseen in the project proposal). 815 pits were opened and 815 plantlets1 were
planted (541 Ziziphus lotus, 115 Asparagus horridus, 45 Noaea mucronata, 39
Thymbra capitata and 75 Phagnalon rupestre). Watering of the plants took place
according to the respective Action Plan but also according to weather conditions.
- Seed dispersal (Fig. 4) of the species Gypsophila linearifolia, Campanula fastigiata
and Herniaria hemistemon took place for the enhancement and restoration of habitat
type *1520. Specifically:
o Enhancement took place in three localities covering 0,46 ha in total (0,1 ha was
foreseen in the project proposal).
o Restoration took place in two localities, covering an area of 0,56 ha (0,1 ha
was foreseen in the project proposal).
For both sub-activities, 13000 seeds of Gypsophila linearifolia, 1100 seeds of
Campanula fastigiata and 9000 seeds of Herniaria hemistemon have been dispersed.
No seedlings coming from seeds dispersal identified in the field mainly due to low
precipitation the past two years. However, the seeds have enriched the soil seed bank
and when the weather conditions become favourable, at least some seedlings are
expected to emerge. This is a common strategy of annual species like Gypsophila
linearifolia and Campanula fastigiata.
- 20 m of stonewalls (50 m of stonewalls were foreseen) have been created to prevent
soil erosion nearby the three restoration sites of habitat type *5220 (Fig. 5). There was
no need for more stonewalls in the framework of this action.
Some minor problems appeared during the implementation of this action. Specifically,
some plants planted in November 2014 have been destroyed due to extreme weather
conditions in January 2015 (heavy rainfall). Moreover, the success rate of plantations
was not the expected one, especially for Ziziphus lotus plantlets. However, the DF
overcame these problems, achieving the project objectives. According to Dr Reyes
Tyrado, member of the SC, taking into consideration the low success rate of Ziziphus
lotus, as well as the difficulties anticipated in the propagation process in her country,
indicated that this success rate can be considered as satisfactory. The final success rate
(percentage of established plants in the field) was 29,4% for Ziziphus lotus, 28,7% for
Asparagus horridus, 60% for Noaea mucronata, 79,5% for Thymbra capitata and
1 The actual number of plants planted was much more. Replanting activities for replacement of failures were
carried out until the end of the project. In general, for the needs of Actions C.3 and C.6 the following number of
individuals were planted: 2520 Ziziphus lotus, 490 Asparagus horridus, 270 Thymbra capitata, 395 Phagnalon
rupestre and 320 Noaea mucronata.
23
92% for Phagnalon rupestre. The DF, which is the competent authority and has a
leading role in implementing the After-LIFE Conservation Plan, will monitor and
maintain the plantations and carry out additional planting as necessary in order to
replace possible failures. In addition, it will try to increase the number of Ziziphus
lotus to the desired level and in any case to ensure that at each planting patch, in all
plantation sites, there will be at least one successfully established individual of
Ziziphus lotus. In this way, the desired distribution of Ziziphus lotus will be achieved
in the re-creation sites. The follow-up procedure and methodology concerning the high
mortality rate of Ziziphus lotus seedlings in the nurseries can be found in Annex 7.1.1.
DF was the responsible beneficiary of this action. Moreover, FU contributed to the
implementation of seeds dispersal at appropriate locations (restoration and
enhancement of habitat type *1520).
Figure 4. Seed dispersal of *1520 habitat type keystone species.
Figure 5. Stonewalls construction.
24
5.1.9. Action C.4: Fire Prevention
Status: COMPLETED
Foreseen start date:
02/01/2015
Actual start date:
02/01/2015
Foreseen end date:
28/02/2017
Actual end date:
28/02/2017
The aim of this action was to apply a series of specific measures to prevent or
minimize the risk of fire, which is a threat to the targeted priority habitat types. The
Action started in January 2015, as planned, by limiting car access (Fig. 6) to roads
indicated in the two management plans elaborated in Action A.4. Vegetation clearings
took place at selected areas in late spring, taking into account the outcomes of Actions
A.1., A.2 and A.4.
Within the framework of this action:
- Limit vehicle access on forest roads was enforced in a length of 3,4 km (1 km was
foreseen in the project proposal). This measure successfully limit vehicle access to
specific areas.
- 16.900 m2 of dry herbaceous vegetation were cleared (manually) each year (2015 and
2016). Total area of clearings: 33800 m2.
- An agricultural tractor cultivated/removed stubble over a belt of 10 m wide (18000
m2) on parts of the perimeter of the site in cereal fields just after harvesting, as
indicated in the Management Plans (see Annex 7.2.8 of MR), for two consecutive
years (2015 and 2016). Total area of clearings: 36000 m2.
The above clearings, either manually or mechanically, took place using external
services. 10000 m2 more ha were cleared by the personnel of the DF (no invoices).
DF was the responsible beneficiary of this action.
Figure 6. Limiting car access at Rizoelia National Forest Park.
25
5.1.10. Action C.5: In situ and inter situ conservation of the targeted habitat types
keystone species
Status: COMPLETED
Foreseen start date:
01/11/2013
Actual start date:
15/10/2013
Foreseen end date:
28/02/2017
Actual end date:
28/02/2017
The aim of this action was the conservation of the targeted habitat types through
activities that focus mainly on their keystone species. Within the framework of this
action, seed collection of the keystone species for both habitat types and production of
saplings of the keystone and accompanying species of *5220 took place. It has to be
mentioned that seed collection of the targeted species took place during the whole
timeframe of the project, according to the fruit-maturity phase of each species. These
seeds were used to study seed germination and to produce saplings (Fig. 7) for the
needs of Actions C.3 and C.6. Specifically,
- Seed germination
Seed germination tests have identified the optimum germination conditions for the
species Ziziphus lotus, Gypsophila linearifolia, Campanula fastigiata and Herniaria
hemistemon.
Zizizphus lotus
Final germination percentages are higher at 20°C in darkness. Only half of the seeds
germinated in any germination treatment tested.
Campanula fastigiata
Germination is promoted by light. The final germination percentages are higher at
15°C (77%), with alternating light conditions (12h light/12h dark).
Gypsophila linearifolia
Most Gypsophila linearifolia’s seeds are dormant. Germination is promoted by light.
The final germination percentages are higher at 10°C (91%) and 15°C (94%), with
alternating light conditions (12h light/12h dark).
Herniaria hemistemon
Most Herniaria hemistemon’s seeds are dormant. Germination is promoted by light
(alternating light conditions - 12h light/12h dark) at temperatures from 10°C to 30°C
(the highest percentage recorded at 30°C – 98%).
Production of saplings
The high mortality of Ziziphus lotus seedlings and samplings (detailed discussed in
Annex 7.1.1) led to the need for an increased effort in the nurseries of the DF. This
issue dealt with by planting (sowing) considerably larger numbers of Ziziphus lotus
seeds, in the nursery. More seedlings have been produced in order to have enough
number of Ziziphus lotus individuals for out-planting. To this end, 20000 Ziziphus
26
lotus seeds were planted; finally producing 2900 saplings. Moreover, 1008 Asparagus
horridus saplings, 598 Thymbra capitate saplings, 660 Noaea mucronata saplings and
1010 Phagnalon rupestre saplings were produced. Most of the above saplings
forwarded for planting in the field for restoration and re-creation of habitat type
*5220.
More information on seed germination and on production of saplings can be found in
the ‘Report on protocols of seed storage, germination, growth and outplanting of the
keystone species’ (Annex 7.2.9).
Furthermore, a 4x4 vehicle was purchased in December 2013 within the framework of
this action. However, the vehicle was used for other actions, too.
The main problem encountered in this action (this was also the main issue during of
the project implementation) was the low percentage of Ziziphus lotus seedlings
production from seeds and, moreover, the high mortality of these seedlings in the
nursery. DF planted much more Ziziphus lotus seeds to overcome the low seed
germination rate and the high saplings mortality of this species. Moreover, DF tested
the production of saplings through cuttings (asexual reproduction) with no success.
Detailed discussion on this issue can be found in Annex 7.1.1.
FU was the responsible beneficiary of this action and responsible for seed collections,
germination tests and development of protocols on germination, growth and
outplanting. DF was responsible for the production of plants (saplings).
Figure 7. Saplings production in the nursery of Department of Forests.
27
5.1.11. Action C.6: Habitat re-creation of arborescent matorral with Ziziphus
(*5220) adjacent to Rizoelia area
Status: COMPLETED
Foreseen start date:
03/11/2014
Actual start date:
15/07/2014
Foreseen end date:
28/02/2017
Actual end date:
28/02/2017
This action aimed at the establishment of the priority habitat *5220 in an area where
the habitat was known to have existed previously but is currently lost (habitat re-
creation). Action C.6 started earlier than the timeframe set in the project proposal (mid
July 2014 instead of October 2014). Preliminary activities such as ground preparation
(i.e garbage removal and mild pruning of shrubs as needed) started in July 2014 at the
proposed locations for re-creation (Fig. 9), indicated in the ‘Action Plan for the habitat
type *5220: Arborescent matorral with Ziziphus, at Rizoelia National Forest Park’
(Action A.5).
Within the framework of this action:
- Three re-creation sites of *5220 habitat type have been created, 1,95 ha in total (2 ha
was foreseen in the project proposal). Three degraded locations (an abandoned field,
an area filled with rubble and an old firebreak, which causes fragmentation of
vegetation) have been selected where the habitat was known to have existed
previously but is currently lost, without affecting the natural vegetation of the area.
2085 hundred pits were opened and 2085 plantlets2 were planted (1194 Ziziphus lotus,
366 Asparagus horridus, 141 Noaea mucronata, 156 Thymbra capitata and 228
Phagnalon rupestre saplings). Watering of the plants (Fig. 8) took place according to
the respective Action Plan but also according to weather conditions.
- 100 m of stonewalls (100 m of stonewalls were foreseen in the project proposal)
have been created to prevent soil erosion nearby or within the re-creation sites of
habitat type *5220 (Fig. 5).
Some minor problems appeared during the implementation of this action. Specifically,
some plants planted in November 2014 have been destroyed due to extreme weather
conditions in January 2015 (heavy rainfall). Moreover, the success rate of plantations
was not the expected one, especially for Ziziphus lotus plantlets. However, the DF
overcame these problems, achieving the project objectives. According to Dr Reyes
Tyrado, member of the SC, taking into consideration the low success rate of Ziziphus
lotus, as well as the difficulties anticipated in the propagation process in her country,
indicated that this success rate can be considered as satisfactory. The final success rate
(percentage of established plants in the field) was 30,7% for Ziziphus lotus, 56,3% for
Asparagus horridus, 87,9% for Noaea mucronata, 98,1% for Thymbra capitata and
92,1% for Phagnalon rupestre. The DF, which is the competent authority and has a
leading role in implementing the After-LIFE Conservation Plan, will monitor and
maintain the plantations and carry out additional planting as necessary in order to
replace possible failures. In addition, it will try to increase the number of Ziziphus
lotus to the desired level and in any case to ensure that at each planting patch, in all
plantation sites, there will be at least one successfully established individual of
Ziziphus lotus. In this way, the desired distribution of Ziziphus lotus will be achieved
2The actual number of plants planted was much more. Replanting activities for replacement of failures were
carried out until the end of the project. In general, for the needs of Actions C.3 and C.6 the following number of
individuals were planted: 2520 Ziziphus lotus, 490 Asparagus horridus, 270 Thymbra capitata, 395 Phagnalon
rupestre and 320 Noaea mucronata.
28
in the re-creation sites. The follow-up procedure and methodology concerning the high
mortality rate of Ziziphus lotus seedlings in the nurseries can be found in Annex 7.1.1.
More details on the outcomes of this action can be found in the ‘Report on the results
of the habitat re-creation (*5220)’ (Annex 7.2.10).
DF was the responsible beneficiary of this action. OUC contributed to the field work
and to the preparation of the report on the results of the habitat re-creation.
Figure 8. Watering of plantlets.
Figure 9. Ground preparation of the re-creation site of *5220 habitat type.
29
5.1.12. Action D.1: Monitoring of Concrete Conservation Actions
Status: COMPLETED
Foreseen start date:
02/11/2013
Actual start date:
02/11/2013
Foreseen end date:
28/02/2017
Actual end date:
28/02/2017
This action was designed to measure the effectiveness of the concrete conservation
actions as compared to the initial situation prior to the start of the project. The Action
D.1 started in November 2013 and concluded by the end of the project, in line with the
project timeframe.
The Conservation Monitoring Protocol was the deliverable of this action (see IR,
Annex 7.2.1) and it was finalized in February 2014 after the 1st SC meeting and the
approval of SC members. The PM and the SCo monitored the progress of the Concrete
Conservation Actions through the evaluation of the Conservation Monitoring Protocol
regularly (at least once a month). The monitoring indicators included in the
Conservation Monitoring Protocol also allowed the project beneficiaries and the SC
either to confirm the adequacy of the developed means to address the specific
problems and threats, or to question these means and alternatively develop new ones.
The SC reviewed the progress achieved towards fulfilling each of the monitoring
indicators during the 2nd official meeting of the SC.
The updated table of Conservation Monitoring Protocol, presenting the final
assessment of the indicators can be found in Annex 7.2.11. In general, the target
numbers were fulfilled more than expected, except in a few cases, where the reason
was clearly explained.
DF was responsible for the elaboration of the Conservation Monitoring Protocol. PM
and SCo were responsible for the evaluation of the Actions ‘C’ according to the
monitoring indicators of the Protocol.
30
Action D.2: Socio-economic study
Status: COMPLETED
Foreseen start date: 02/09/2013
Actual start date: 01/11/2013
Foreseen end date: 28/02/2017
Actual end date: 28/02/2017
The aim of the action was to identify and assess the ecosystem services in the area and
the socio-economic impacts of the project to the local communities. The action started
in November 2013 by reviewing the existing frameworks for ecosystem services
assessment (including Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) and concluded at the end
of the project, in line with the project timeframe.
A different approach to the one initially suggested for evaluating ecosystem services
(ES) in the study area was adopted. The Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-based
Assessment (TESSA), developed by the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and
the University of Cambridge, was selected as the most suitable kit for the ecosystem
services assessment at a site-based level. TESSA toolkit (Peh et al., 2013) is designed
to identify and assess the most important ecosystem services of a specific site by
providing templates of assessment, which can be adapted to local conditions. It is a
more rigorous, objective tool which has been tested in other geographical context and
provided scientific validity to the project’s results. Access to the TESSA kit was
requested and granted.
The Rapid Appraisal analysis of TESSA toolkit revealed that the most important
ecosystem services supported by the study area are:
i. Nature-based recreation and
ii. Carbon related services involved in the Global Climate Regulation.
The SC confirmed results from TESSA toolkit considering the ecosystem services in
the study area during the meeting held in February 2014.
Assessing nature-based recreation
Census method (Recreation Method 1) was used for measuring the volume and the
economic value of nature-based tourism and recreation at RNFP. The key information
was the total number of annual visits (Table 2). Visitors counting took place in a large
and representative sample of days through a year, from April 2014 until February
2015. Census time was divided into 3 periods (March-May, June-October, November-
February) and within each period 7 census surveys (21 in a total) were conducted
including weekends, weekdays and national holidays. The counting and questioning
points were located at the site entrances (North and South) of RNFP and the census
surveys took place from 7:00 to 19:00.
Table 2. Number of visits recorded on three census periods. Period A
(March-May) Period Β
(June-October) Period C
(November-February) TOTAL
No of annual visits 3834 4734 5903 14471
The socio-economic Indicator assessed by this action considering the nature-based
recreation is the annual number of visits (14471).
31
Global climate regulation
Based on TESSA, the following were estimated: Above-ground biomass (AGB),
Below-ground biomass (BGB), Litter and dead organic matter, Soil carbon stock in
soils, Total Carbon stock and greenhouse gas emissions of each habitat type within the
Park. The results showed that the total carbon stock in the study area is 14247.33 tC
(Table 3).
Table 3. Carbon stock estimations for each habitat type and total carbon stock in the
study area; [Above Ground Biomass (C_ABG), Below Ground Biomass (C_BGB),
Soil organic carbon stock for mineral soils (C_Soil), Dead organic matter (C_dead)].
In addition, an ES 'matrix' approach (Burkhard et al. 2009) was employed to map the
potential/capacity of habitat types within the RNFP to support a range of ES. The
scores awarded to each habitat and function were derived through brainstorming
sessions and literature searches. Scores retained represent the consensus of these
sessions between St.C and local experts from the DF, DE, OUC and FU. When the
sum for all groups of services was calculated, the results demonstrated that plantations
with an understory of habitat types 1520*, 6220* and 5420 attain the highest capacity
value in ES provision in the study area.
Local population perceptions and attitudes: A short questionnaire of 12 questions
with c.20 min duration about perception and attitudes of the local population towards
the conservation activities and Natura 2000 sites was created as a basis for information
collection from the urban areas around the park. The questionnaire included generic
personal questions, general questions about Natura 2000 and about the RNFP. The
questionnaire was tested over the phone in a small sample (20 respondents) of local
inhabitants in the areas of Aradippou and Larnaca in October 2015 and modifications
were made where seen necessary. This was followed by a large-scale phone survey in
the areas surrounding RNFP in order to ‘map’ the perception of the local population
regarding nature conservation and Natura 2000 sites. The phone survey run from
November 2015 until December 2016, coupled with some selected randomly
distributed questionnaires (snowballing technique) resulting in 298 responses in total.
Habitat Type TESSA
Habitat
Classificatio
n
Area
(ha)
C_AGB
(tC)
C_BGB
(tC)
C_Soil
(tC)
C_dead
(tC)
Total
Carbon
stocks
(tC)
Tree-
dominated
habitat
Needle-leaf
Plantation
Temperate
scrub/woodl
and
14.57 349.59 139.84 295.69
Broadleaf
Plantation
14.09 338.06 148.75 no data
Shrub-
dominated
habitat
Sarcopoterium
spinosum
phryganas (5420)
14.48 347.47 972.92 no data
Arborescent
matorrals with
Ziziphus (5220)
0.38 9.19 25.74 no data
Grass
Dominated
Pseudo-steppe
with grasses and
annuals (6220)
Temperate
grassland
0.19 0.20 0.57 0.00
1045 1288 11619 296 14247
32
The questionnaire responses revealed that although many of the respondents had heard
of the Natura 2000 network (49%), they were uncertain about its aims and role in
nature conservation (70% of the respondents). Respondents (79%) thought that there is
a degree of conflict between Natura 2000 and other forms of land development. The
majority of the respondents (95%) believed that there are multiple benefits in nature
conservation, and the majority (73%) do not think that nature conservation imposes
too many restrictions on land development. In addition, 77% of the respondents
thought that the areal extent of protected areas in Cyprus is currently small and should
be increased. Most respondents were familiar with protected areas in their district
(63% of the respondents), and in particular with RNFP (83%) which they seem to have
visited often. Seventy nine percent (79%) of the respondents welcomed the proposed
changes carried out by the LIFE-RIZOELIA project, regarding visitor related
infrastructure and public awareness.
In addition, the visits of local schools in the park were monitored annually until the
end of the project recording a total of 38 visits (c.9 per year), i.e. 950 students in total.
The ‘Study on the impacts of the project on the local economy and the ecosystems
functions’ can be found in Annex 7.2.12.
To the best of our knowledge this is the first study at the national level which in a
protected area context provided quantification and mapping of ES with the use of
widely employed tools, recorded in a systematic extensive manner the number of
visitors and carried out a large-scale survey on attitudes and perceptions on Natura
2000 sites.
OUC was the responsible beneficiary of this action.
33
5.2 Dissemination actions
5.2.1 Objectives
Despite the fact that no dissemination plan was foreseen in the project proposal, the four
actions included in ‘Public awareness and dissemination of results’ ensure the
information and awareness on the project implementation and outputs to the target groups
set by the project proposal. Specifically,
- Local workshops, notice boards and habitat information boards, leaflets and
newsletters aimed to raise awareness of local people, local authorities and students of
the nearby schools, universities, government authorities, tourists, farmers and relevant
NGOs on the project activities.
- Media coverage (press releases and articles), website development, final info day and
layman’s report aimed to promote the project implementation and results to the
general public.
- Account on social community website aimed to promote the project and
environmental awareness on young people, students, local people and the general
public.
- The promotion material (pens, hats), available at the premises of each beneficiary, at
RNFP and at Athalassa Environmental Information Centre, contributed to the project
dissemination to students, NGOs, tourists, local people and the general public.
- Scientific publications in conferences aimed to the promotion of the project and the
restoration efforts on the targeted habitat types to the scientific community, students
and universities.
Figure 10. First Local Workshop in Aradippou Municipality Hall.
34
5.2.2 Dissemination: overview per activity
5.2.2.1. Action E.1: Information campaign
Status: COMPLETED
Foreseen start date:
02/10/2013
Actual start date:
02/10/2013
Foreseen end date:
28/02/2017
Actual end date:
10/02/2017
Action E.1 focused on the promotion of public awareness about the actions, targets and
expected results of the project. The action started in October 2013 with the development
of the project logo and concluded with the organization of Final Info Day.
Within the framework of this action:
- Two local workshops were organised at Aradippou.
- Four notice boards and four habitat information were established at RNFP.
- Five press releases (three press releases were foreseen in the project proposal) were
published in national and local newspapers and online news websites,
- Five articles (three articles were foreseen in the project proposal) were published in
newspapers and magazines,
- Three newsletters and a leaflet were published.
- A Final Info-day took place at the end of the project.
- A flyer (outside LIFE activity) was prepared and distributed to all inhabitants of
Aradippou Municipality (6000 copies) in March 2015, as it was proposed in the first
local workshop held on the 9th of May 2014, at Aradippou Municipality Hall. The
project flyer can be found in Annex 7.3.3.7 of MR.
Dissemination related products can be found on the DVD provided with this report.
Specifically:
Local Workshops
- The first Local Workshop (Fig. 10) was held in Aradippou Municipality Hall on 9th May
2014. Local workshop focused on the presentation of the main aim of the project, its
actions and the targeted habitat types. The target groups of people invited included local
authorities and local people (Aradippou and Larnaca Municipalities), government
authorities, environmental organizations (NGOs), universities and research institutes,
the union of agro-tourism enterprises and farmers. The discussion that followed the
presentation showed the participants’ interest on the project and their will to collaborate
for the proper implementation of the project activities. The Report on the first Local
Workshop was prepared in May 2014 (Annex 7.2.11 of the MR).
- The second Local Workshop (Fig. 11) was implemented on the 11th of March 2016, at
Aradippou Municipality Hall. It focused on the progress of the project and the goals
achieved by that date. The workshop was successfully implemented and the
participation was satisfactory. The discussion that followed the presentation showed the
participants’ interest on the project. Their comments focused on the necessity of more
control by the competent authorities on the illegal activities in the Park, i.e. use of
motorcycles and dog walks. Moreover, as they pointed out, leisure activities that take
place in the Park sometimes affect directly or indirectly the targeted habitats. They
highlighted the efforts to reduce the impact of the invasive species Acacia saligna and
their will to contribute to the project’s activities or in cleaning campaigns. Finally, they
agreed to the implementation of a stronger awareness campaign on the importance of
35
the targeted habitat types and their conservation, targeting specifically the residents of
Aradippou and Larnaca municipalities who visit RNFP for leisure and training. The
Report on thesecond Local Workshop can be found in Annex 7.2.14 of this report.
Figure 11. Second Local Workshop in Aradippou Municipality Hall.
Notice boards and habitat information boards
- Two Habitat Information Boards and two Notice Boards were installed at RNFP in
November 2014. These boards were established at the two entrances of the RNFP in
Greek and English language and contain information on the RNFP along with hiking
code of conduct (notice boards) and on the project, the targeted habitat types and the
threats that the habitat types face (habitat information boards).
- Two more Habitat Information Boards and two more Notice Boards were installed at
RNFP in April 2015. These boards were established at two locations in Greek and
English language: near habitat type *5220 and near habitat type *1520 and included
information on the project and its activities (notice boards) and on the targeted habitat
types and the threats that the habitat types face (habitat information boards). Photos of
all installed boards can be found Annex 7.3.1 of PR.
Press releases
- The first press release (Annex 7.3.3.1 of MR) was published in newspapers in
November 2013. The first press release announced the start of the LIFE project, the
project aims and targeted habitat types and the contribution of EC, through the LIFE+
program.
- The second press release (Annex 7.3.3.4 of MR) was published to the media in
November 2014 and it was about the implementation of the second meeting of the
Stakeholder Committee on 11th November 2014.
- The third press release (Annex 7.2.2 of PR) was forwarded through Cyprus News
Agency and published to Sigmalive.com, ikypros.com, Paideia-news.com and
36
Palo.com.cy on November 2015. The third press release stated the implementation of
concrete conservation actions on the targeted habitat types.
- Two more press releases were published in the official newspaper of Aradippou
Municipality promoting the implementation of the project. The first was published in
July 2014 and the second in April 2016. The two press releases (outside LIFE activity)
can be found in Annex 7.3.3.1).
Articles
- The first article (Annex 7.3.3.2 of this MR) was published in newspapers/ magazine in
March 2014. Apart of the project aims and targeted habitat types, it has included clear
information on the project actions.
- The second article (Annex 7.3.3.6 of MR) was published in June 2015 in ‘Agrotis’
magazine, the official magazine of the Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and
Environment. The article aimed to inform the employees of the Ministry as well as the
farmers on the project implementation.
- The third article was published in April 2016 in selected online news websites. The
article aimed to inform the general public on the concrete conservation actions
undertaken in RNFP. The third article can be found in Annex 7.3.3.2.
- Two more articles were published (outside activities). One article was published in
December 2014 in ‘Dasiki Thisavri’ (Annex 7.3.3.8 of MR), the official magazine of
the Cyprus Forestry Association and one extended article in August 2016 in the official
newspaper of Aradippou Municipality (Annex 7.3.3.3 of this report).
Newsletters
- The first newsletter (Annex 7.3.3.3 of MR) was prepared in September 2014 and
included information on the RNFP, the targeted habitat types and the activities of the
project by September 2014. Several photographs were also included.
- The second newsletter (Annex 7.2.1 of PR) was printed in October 2015. It stated the
progress of the conservation actions of the project.
- The third newsletter (Annex 7.3.3.4 of this report) was published in September 2016,
including information on the outcomes of the project and the results that were expected
to be achieved by the end of the project.
Leaflet
- The project leaflet (Annex 7.3.3.5 of MR) was prepared in January 2015. The project
leaflet was prepared in Greek an English language and contained information on project
activities along with photographs of concrete conservation actions.
Final Info-day
- The Final Info-Day (Fig. 12) of the project took place on 08/02/2017 at Aradippou
Municipality Hall. The event welcomed and honored by the presence of the Minister of
Education and Culture Dr. Costas Kadis. Dr. Kadis mentioned the importance of
undertaking such initiatives for the promotion and protection of the biodiversity of the
island. The Mayor of Aradippou, Mr. Evangelos Evaggelidis, emphasized the
importance of maintaining biodiversity and thanked the project partners for their
contribution. Mr. Andreas Karittevlis praised the efforts undertaken at RNFP in
Aradippou Municipality for environmental protection, noting the full support of the
Municipality undertaking such initiatives in the future. The PC, the SCo and the PM
presented the objectives of the project, the two habitats, the threats affecting the habitats
and the achievements of the project, as well as the ecosystem services provided by the
RNFP. Eighty-five people attended the event. The invitation, the program and some
photos of the event are presented in Annex 7.3.3.5.
- The event was promoted through several ways:
o The website and the Facebook group of the project.
37
o The creation and dissemination of an invitation and program (outside life activity) to
local people.
o The creation of a banner for the event (outside life activity).
o The promotion of the event through radio. It was on the radio show ‘proino
dromologio’ on 07/02/2017 (outside life activity). The playback can be found on the
project DVD.
o After the event, the project and the Final Info-Day were presented on TV shows on
09/02/2017: ‘proti enimerosi’ at 07:00 and ‘RIK NEWS’ at 20:30. (outside life
activity). The videos can also be found on the project DVD.
Table 4 presents the allocation of the newsletters, flyers and project leaflet.
FU was the responsible beneficiary of this action. FU has produced the newsletters,
leaflets, press releases, articles and designed the notice and habitat information boards.
DF has organised the two workshops and the Final Info-day. Moreover, DF has
installed the notice and habitat information boards at the RNFP.
Figure 12. Final Info-Day.
38
Table 4. Allocation of the newsletters, flyer and the project leaflet.
S/N Deliverable Partner
disseminating Target Group Aim (Action) No. Date
1 1st
Newsletter
DF NGOs,
General public Dissemination (E.2) 100 10/2014
RFS Local people Dissemination (E.2) 500 10/2014
OUC Students,
Scientists Dissemination (E.2) 100 10/2014
DE NGOs,
General public Dissemination (E.2) 100 10/2014
AEIC Students,
General public Dissemination (E.2) 100 3/2015
FU
Students (Green
Week Satellite
Event)
Dissemination (E.2) 100 6/2015
2 Leaflet
(GR, EN)
DF Scientists,
Experts
Experts Workshop
(F.5)
35 GR
15 EN 1/2015
DF NGOs,
General public Dissemination (E.2)
50 GR
150 EN 2/2015
FU Students Dissemination (E.2) 150 GR
150 EN 2/2015
RFS Local people Dissemination (E.2) 75 GR
75 EN 2/2015
OUC Students,
Scientists Dissemination (E.2)
50 GR
150 EN 2/2015
DE NGOs,
General public Dissemination (E.2)
50 GR
150 EN 2/2015
FU Public Secondary
Schools (2) Dissemination (E.2)
1090
GR 2/2015
FU Private Secondary
School Dissemination (E.2) 400 EN 2/2015
FU Aradippou
Municipality Dissemination (E.2)
75 GR
75EN 2/2015
AEIC Students,
General public Dissemination (E.2)
150 GR
150 EN 3/2015
FU
Students (Green
Week Satellite
Event)
Dissemination (E.2) 100 GR 6/2015
DE NGOs,
General public Dissemination (E.2) 200 EN 3/2016
FU Participants
6th WORLD
CONGRESS ON
MOUNTAIN
UNGULATES»
and the «5th
INTERNATIONAL
SYMPOSIUM ON
MOUFLON
Conference
50 GR
60 EN 8/2016
DF
Ayia Napa
International
Festival
Dissemination (E.2) 300 EN 9/2016
OUC Participants European 40 EN 9/2016
39
Ecosystem Services
2016 conference
RFS Students Dissemination (E.2) 25 GR 10/2016
FU Participants 1st Forestry
workshop (Cyprus) 85 EN 1/2017
FU Local people Final Info Day 100 GR 2/2017
3 Flyer FU Aradippou local
people
Outside LIFE
activity 6000 3/2015
4 2nd
Newsletter
DF NGOs,
General public
Dissemination (E.2) 200 10/2015
RFS Local people Dissemination (E.2) 200 10/2015
OUC Students,
Scientists
Dissemination
(E.2)
100 10/2015
DE NGOs,
General public
Dissemination
(E.2)
150 10/2015
FU Students,
General public
Dissemination
(E.2)
150 10/2015
FU Aradippou
Municipality
Dissemination
(E.2)
200 10/2015
5 3rd
Newsletter
DF NGOs,
General public
Dissemination (E.2) 100 10/2016
RFS Local people Dissemination (E.2) 200 10/2016
OUC Students,
Scientists
Dissemination
(E.2)
200 10/2016
DE NGOs,
General public
Dissemination
(E.2)
200 10/2016
AEIC Students,
General public Dissemination (E.2) 100
10/2016
FU Aradippou
Municipality
Dissemination
(E.2)
200 10/2016
40
5.2.2.2. Action E.2: Website development – Production of promotion material
Status: COMPLETED
Foreseen start date:
02/09/2013
Actual start date:
15/09/2013
Foreseen end date:
28/02/2017
Actual end date:
28/02/2017
This Action focused on the presentation and promotion of the project, the scientific
data and the outcomes of the project through the development of a website, the
creation of account on social community website and the production and
dissemination of information material. Action E.2 started in September 2013 and
concluded by the project.
An account in social community website (Facebook) was created from the early stages
of the project (September 2013). The link for the project’s group is
https://www.facebook.com/groups/rizoelia/. The group was periodically updated
following the project’s progress. The group has now 266 members.
The development of the project website started in October 2013. The website (Greek
language) was published online in February 2014. The website url is http://www.life-
rizoelia.eu/. The English website was published online in March 2014. The project’s
website was periodically updated following the project’s progress. The comments on
project website indicated in the Ref. Ares(2014)3014571 - 15/09/2014 answer of the
DG Environment to the Inception Report (the answer was received in February 2015)
were adopted in March 2015. The traffic report (website hits) of the website can be
found in Annex 7.3.3.6 of this report. Unfortunately, there is period without data (June
2014-Jan 2015). At that time, the provider of statistic data (Sitemeter) stopped keeping
monthly records. Total unique visits were properly recorded. Despite the repeatedly
contact by email to the service provider, there was no response. In February 2015, the
website administrator move to a new free website statistics provider (StatCounter),
which from that time data records on website visits were kept in monthly basis.
Promotion material (Fig. 13) were produced in July 2014 (provided with the MR). The
allocation of promotional material is presented in Table 5.
FU was the responsible beneficiary of this action. FU provided information for the
website development, produced the promotion material and created the account on
social community website. DF was responsible for the development of the project's
website and its updating.
41
Table 5. Allocation of promotional material.
S/N Deliverable Partner
disseminating Target Group Aim (Action) No. Date
1 Hats
DF NGOs,
General public Dissemination (E.2) 100 7/2014
RFS Local people Dissemination (E.2) 100 7/2014
OUC Students,
Scientists Dissemination (E.2) 100 7/2014
DE NGOs,
General public Dissemination (E.2) 100 7/2014
FU Students Dissemination (E.2) 200 10/2014
DF Scientists,
NGOs
Biogeographical
Workshop (Outside
LIFE activity)
75 8/2014
RFS Local people,
NGOs
2nd Stakeholders’
Committee Meeting
(F.4)
23 11/2014
RFS Local people Local people 25 11/2014
DF Scientists,
Experts
Experts Workshop
(F.5) 45 1/2015
RFS Local people Dissemination (E.2) 30 2/2015
AEIC Students,
General public Dissemination (E.2) 100 3/2015
FU
Students (Green
Week Satellite
Event)
Dissemination (E.2) 50 6/2015
FU Participants
6th WORLD
CONGRESS ON
MOUNTAIN
UNGULATES»
and the «5th
INTERNATIONAL
SYMPOSIUM ON
MOUFLON
Cnference
40 8/2016
FU Teachers Valgreen Erasmus+
KA2 Project 12 1/2017
2 Pens
DF NGOs,
General public Dissemination (E.2) 100 7/2014
RFS Local people Dissemination (E.2) 100 7/2014
OUC Students,
Scientists Dissemination (E.2) 100 7/2014
FU Students Dissemination (E.2) 200 10/2014
DE NGOs,
General public Dissemination (E.2) 100 7/2014
DF
Biogeographical
Workshop
(Outside LIFE)
Biogeographical
Workshop (Outside
LIFE)
75 8/2014
RFS Local people,
NGOs
2nd Stakeholders’
Committee Meeting
(F.4)
23 11/2014
RFS Local people Dissemination (E.2) 25 11/2014
DF Scientists, Experts Workshop 45 1/2015
42
Experts (F.5)
RFS Local people Dissemination (E.2) 35 2/2015
AEIC Students,
General public Dissemination (E.2) 100 3/2015
FU
Students (Green
Week Satellite
Event)
Dissemination (E.2) 300 6/2015
RFS Local people Dissemination (E.2) 300 4/2016
OUC Students,
Scientists Dissemination (E.2) 200 4/2016
DE NGOs,
General public Dissemination (E.2) 200 4/2016
FU Students Dissemination (E.2) 300 4/2016
Aradippou
Municipality Local people Dissemination (E.2) 275 4/2016
FU Participants
6th WORLD
CONGRESS ON
MOUNTAIN
UNGULATES»
and the «5th
INTERNATIONAL
SYMPOSIUM ON
MOUFLON
Cnference
110 8/2016
DF
Ayia Napa
International
Festival
Dissemination (E.2) 300 9/2016
FU Teachers Valgreen Erasmus+
KA2 Project 12 1/2017
FU Local People Final Info Day 100 2/2017
Figure 13. Promotional material.
43
5.2.2.3. Action E.3: Conferences
Status: COMPLETED
Foreseen start date:
02/10/2013
Actual start date:
15/09/2013
Foreseen end date:
30/12/2016
Actual end date:
28/10/2016
This Action focused on the presentation and publication of the scientific data and the
outcomes of the project through participation in scientific conferences. It was foreseen
that the project will be presented in four scientific conferences (by December 2016),
through oral/poster presentations and scientific articles about the project will be published
in the respective volumes of the proceedings of these conferences.
The project was presented in eight conferences, out of which four are considered outside
LIFE activities Specifically, at:
- The 13th Panhellenic Scientific Conference of the Hellenic Botanical Society at
Thessaloniki (Greece) in October 2013 (outside LIFE activity) – see Annex 7.3.3.9 of
MR),
- The ialeUK Annual Conference in London (UK) in August 2014 – see Annex 7.3.3.10
of MR,
- The 7th Panhellenic Ecology Conference of the Hellenic Ecological Society at
Mytilene (Greece) in October 2014 – see Annex 7.3.3.11 of MR,
- The Joint 2014 Annual Meeting of the British Ecological Society and the French
Ecology Society at Lille (France) in December 2014 (outside LIFE activity) – see
Annex 7.3.3.12 of MR,
- The 27th International Congress for Conservation Biology and the 4th European
Congress for Conservation Biology at Montpellier (France) in August 2015 (outside
LIFE activity) – see Annex 7.2.3 of PR,
- The European Ecosystem Services Conference: Helping nature to help us at Antwerp
(Belgium) in September 2016 (outside LIFE activity) – see Annex 7.3.3.7 of this
report,
- The World Congress Silvo-Pastoral Systems 2016: Silvo-Pastoral Systems in a
changing world. Functions, management and people at Evora (Portugal) in
September 2016 – see Annex 7.3.3.8 of this report,
- The 8th Panhellenic Ecology Conference '150+ years of Ecology: structures, dynamics
and survival strategies' at Thessaloniki (Greece) in October 2016 – see Annex 7.3.3.9
of this report.
Abstracts and Posters of all conferences can be found on the DVD provided with the FR.
OUC was the responsible beneficiary of this action. The presentations at scientific
conferences were implemented by both OUC and FU.
44
5.2.2.4. Action E.4: Layman’s report
Status: COMPLETED
Foreseen start date:
01/09/2016
Actual start date:
05/01/2016
Foreseen end date:
28/02/2017
Actual end date:
28/02/2017
This Action focused on the presentation and publication of the project results through the
production of a Layman’s report. This action started earlier (January 2016) and continued
until the end of the project. Preliminary work took place in order to liaise with partners
and set up the specifications and the content of the Layman’s Report.
The Greek version (130 copies) of the Layman’s report printed on 07/02/2016 and
distributed to the participants of the Final Info-day. The English version (130 copies) was
ready by the end of the project and given to the project partners in order to be distributed
accordingly. The Layman’s report can be found in Annex 7.3.1. It is also provided in hard
copy.
OUC was the responsible beneficiary of this action. However, all partners have
contributed to the production of the Layman’s report.
5.3 Evaluation of Project Implementation
In general, the project was efficiently and timely implemented, according to the project’s
approved work plan, without substantial divergences from the initial proposal. The
project encountered no serious problems during the implementation of the project actions.
All problems that occurred during the project’s implementation were resolved from their
beginning, mainly owing to the efficient cooperation between the project’s partners, the
PMT, as well as the consultation of SC and ShC. The preparatory actions, necessary for
the collection of the required information and knowledge base, were successfully
concluded and gave appropriate, technical details for the implementation of concrete
conservation actions. Conservation actions were successfully implemented and in most
cases, they have achieved more than the expected results.
A minor problem that was raised was the low percentage of Ziziphus lotus seedlings
production from seeds (Action C.5) and, moreover, the high mortality of these seedlings
in the nursery. DF has successfully overcame this issue (see Annex 7.1.1). Finally, the
cost of actions’ implementation was according to the proposed project budget, thus
securing the cost-efficiency of actions.
Table 6 presents the results achieved against the project objectives. It clearly assesses
whether the objectives were met by implementing specific project activities. Please note
that a specific activity may fulfil more than one project objective.
Table 6. Results achieved against project objectives.
Objective Task Foreseen in the
revised proposal Achieved Evaluation
To contribute
to the
consolidation
and
dissemination
Detailed mapping of
the distribution of the
targeted habitat types
Production of one
colour map
Production of four
colour maps (due to
large amount of
data)
Completed
Establishment of Elaboration of a ‘Report on Completed
45
of a
knowledge
base for the
protection,
restoration,
monitoring
and evaluation
of targeted
priority habitat
types
reference plots -
vegetation sampling
report regarding
population structure
of *1520 habitat
type
population structure
of the priority
habitat type *1520’
delivered
Preparation of two
Monitoring Plans
Elaboration of two
Monitoring Plans
Two Monitoring
Plans delivered Completed
Preparation of two
Management Plans
Elaboration of two
Management Plans
Two Management
Plans delivered Completed
Preparation of two
Action Plans
Elaboration of two
Action Plans
Two Action Plans
delivered Completed
Networking with other
projects
Visit to the projects
LIFE00
NAT/E/007304 and
LIFE03
NAT/E/000059
One report from the
visit to LIFE00
NAT/E/007304
Completed
Organization of an
Experts workshop
Experts workshop -
Proceedings of the
expert’s workshop
Experts workshop
organised -
Proceedings of the
expert’s workshop
delivered
Completed
Establishment of a
Scientific Committee
Two official
meetings of the
Scientific
Committee
Two official
meetings and an
unofficial meeting
during experts’
workshop took
place
Completed
To increase
habitat
connectivity
for arborescent
matorral with
Ziziphus
(*5220)
Preparation of two
Action Plans
Elaboration of two
Action Plans
Two Action Plans
delivered Completed
Preparation of
Feasibility Study
Elaboration of a
Feasibility Study
A Feasibility Study
delivered Completed
Minimizing the impact
of competitive
vegetation
Control of 0,4 ha of
Acacia saligna (500
individuals)
6,8 ha of Acacia
saligna controlled
(> 10000 stems)
Completed
Restoration of *5220 Restoration of 1 ha
of *5220
1,97 ha of *5220
restored Completed
Production of saplings
2500 Zyziphus lotus,
350 Asparagus
horridus,
350 Phagnalon
rupestre,
350 Thymbra
capitata,
350 Noaea
mucronata
2900 Zyziphus lotus,
1008 Asparagus
horridus,
1010 Phagnalon
rupestre,
598 Thymbra
capitata,
660 Noaea
mucronata produced
Completed
Re-creation of *5220 Re-creation of 2 ha
of *5220
1,95 ha of *5220 re-
created Completed
To reduce the
risk of fire
affecting both
targeted
priority habitat
types
Demarcation of *1520
habitat type
2 Km of soft –
fencing
1,3 Km of soft –
fencing created Completed
Clearing of vegetation
on parts of the
perimeter of RNFP
(with agricultural
tractor)
Belt of 10 m wide
on parts of the
perimeter to reduce
fuel continuity
36000 m2 of
clearings created
(10 m wide)
Completed
46
Vegetation clearings
(manually)
20000 m2 of
clearing/year (2
years)
33.800 m2 of dry
herbaceous
vegetation cleared
Completed
Limited road access Limited road access
by 1 km
3,4 Km of road
network has been
closed.
Completed
To eradicate
competitive
vegetation for
both priority
habitats
Preparation of two
Action Plans
Elaboration of two
Action Plans
Two Action Plans
delivered Completed
Minimizing the impact
of competitive
vegetation
Control of 0.4 ha of
Acacia saligna (500
individuals)
6,8 ha of Acacia
saligna controlled
(> 10000 stems)
Completed
To manage
leisure
activities and
accessibility in
the park in a
favourable
manner to the
conservation
of the priority
habitats.
Demarcation of *1520
habitat type
2 Km of soft –
fencing
1,3 Km of soft –
fencing Completed
Limited road access Limited road access
by 1 km
3,4 Km of road
network has been
closed.
Completed
Information campaign
(workshops,
information material
etc)
2 Local Workshops
4 Notice Boards
4 Habitat
Information Boards
3 Press Releases
3 Articles
3 Newsletters
1 Leaflet
Final Info Day
Website
Facebook group
Hats-Pens
4 Conferences
Layman’s report
4 Stakeholders
meetings
2 Local Workshops
4 Notice Boards
4 Habitat
Information Boards
5 Press Releases
5 Articles
3 Newsletters
1 Leaflet
Final Info Day
Website
Facebook group
Hats-Pens
8 Conferences
Layman’s report
4 Stakeholders
meetings
Completed
To promote
and enable the
long-term
conservation
of the habitat
types *5220
and *1520
Expansion of the
targeted Natura 2000
site
Update of the SDF SDF updated Completed
Demarcation of *1520
habitat type
2 Km of soft –
fencing
1,3 Km of soft –
fencing Completed
Restoration of *5220 Restoration of 1 ha
of *5220
1,97 ha of *5220
restored Completed
Restoration of *1520 Restoration of 0,1
ha of *1520
0,56 ha of *1520
restored (850 seeds
of Campanula
fastigiata, 3400
seeds of Gypsophila
linearifolia and
4100 seeds of
Herniaria
hemistemon have
been dispersed)
Completed
Enhancement of
*1520
Enhancement of 0,1
ha of *1520
0,46 ha of *1520
enhanced (250 seeds
of Campanula
fastigiata, 9600
seeds of Gypsophila
Completed
47
linearifolia and
4900 seeds of
Herniaria
hemistemon have
been dispersed)
Production of saplings
2500 Zyziphus lotus,
350 Asparagus
horridus,
350 Phagnalon
rupestre,
350 Thymbra
capitata,
350 Noaea
mucronata
2900 Zyziphus lotus,
1008 Asparagus
horridus,
1010 Phagnalon
rupestre,
598 Thymbra
capitata,
660 Noaea
mucronata produced
Completed
Re-creation of *5220 Re-creation of 2 ha
of *5220
1,95 ha of *5220 re-
created Completed
Elaboration of an
After-LIFE
Conservation Plan
After-LIFE
Conservation Plan
After-LIFE
Conservation Plan
delivered with this
report
Completed
Most of the concrete conservation actions applied are immediately visible. However,
activities regarding restoration or re-creation of the targeted habitats, especially for *5220
(woody vegetation), require several years in order to become natural habitats (long-term
procedure).
The dissemination activities were of great importance for the project’s smooth
implementation since they presented the project’s main aim and actions, the targeted
priority habitat types, as well as the project outputs to the general public, to the local
people, to interested stakeholders and to the general scientific community. All foreseen
dissemination activities have successfully implemented. Interaction with Aradippou
municipality continued throughout the project through the presentation of the project’s
implementation in the ShC meetings, the local workshops, the participation of
stakeholders in re-creation activities of the habitat type *5220 in Alona area and the Final
Info-day. The project activities and outputs have been promoted constantly through the
media (by press releases and articles in the newspapers/magazines), through the
distribution of information material, through the project’s website and social community
website (Facebook) and through the presentation in Scientific conferences. The
establishment of total 8 boards at strategic places in RNFP secured the park visitors’
awareness. Specific activities enhanced public awareness, promoted the project’s
implementation, or presented project’s results to several outside – LIFE activities, i.e.
• production of a project flyer,
• publication in ‘Dasiki Thisavri’ (the official magazine of the Cyprus Forestry
Association),
• participation at four more scientific conferences,
• presentation of the project in the Mediterranean Kick off Seminar through the Natura
2000 Seminars of the Mediterranean Biogeographical Region on 26th-28th May 2014
– Action F.5,
48
• participation of the LIFE-RIZOELIA project at the Green Week Satellite Event and at
the European Natura 2000 Day organized in Cyprus in 2015 and at the Final Info Day
of the LIFE+ project JUNIPERCY,
• co-organization, with other LIFE projects implementing in Cyprus, of the ‘LIFE
Nature Platform Meeting on the management of Mediterranean habitat’ on 9-10
October 2014 at Polis Chrysochous,
• publication of two more articles and press releases and
• promotion of the Final Info-Day through the media.
5.4 Analysis of long-term benefits
The project had a significant positive impact on the conservation status of the targeted
habitat types. Specific activities have taken place during the project implementation and
in conjunction with the actions that are included in the ‘After-LIFE conservation plan’,
aim to the long-term conservation of the habitat types *1520 and *5220.
Specifically:
- Within the framework of the project, the priority habitat types *1520 and *5220 have
been precisely mapped. More areas than those originally known have been identified;
an important fact, especially for habitat type *1520, since this habitat type occurs
only in one Natura 2000 site in Cyprus: ‘Ethniko Dasiko Parko Rizoelias’.
- Important knowledge was achieved regarding the composition and structure of
habitat type *1520 in Cyprus. Two keystone species were identified: Gypsophila
linearifolia and Campanula fastigiata.
- The implementation of the two Monitoring Plans after the end of the project ensures
the long-term sustainability of the targeted habitat types. Monitoring will provide the
necessary information in order to maintain favourable conservation status of the
targeted habitat types.
- Management Plans on the two habitat types, elaborated during the first phase of the
project implementation, provided the necessary information to the local forest station
of the DF for the sound management of the habitat types *1520 and *5220 within
RNFP.
- The two Action Plans provided right, and scientifically accepted, technical details to
the employees of the DF in order to apply the conservation measures to the habitat
types *1520 and *5220.
- The expansion of the Natura 2000 site CY6000006 (and the update of the relevant
SDF) secures the implementation of the Directive 92/43/EEC and the Law for the
Protection and Management of Nature and Wildlife (N.153 (I)-2003) beyond of the
current boundaries of the Natura 2000 site, where the two habitat types occur.
- The optimum germination conditions of the seeds of Ziziphus lotus, Gypsophila
linearifolia, Herniaria hemistemon and Campanula fastigiata were determined and
provide the necessary knowledge for any future effort undertaken regarding in situ or
ex situ conservation.
The above points provide to the DF (the competent authority for Natura 2000 sites within
State Forest Land) the necessary information to continue to apply specific management
measures after the end of the project, ensuring the long-term conservation of the two
targeted habitat types.
The long-term sustainability of the project and consequently the long-term benefits for
the targeted habitat types will be continued through the implementation of the ‘After-
49
LIFE conservation plan’. The ‘After-LIFE conservation plan’ describes how the partners
plan to continue and develop the actions that have been initiated through this project,
after the end of the project. Moreover, it describes how the long-term management of the
targeted habitat types will be secured. The ‘After-LIFE Conservation Plan’ gives details
on the actions that will be carried out in the future and it forms a separate chapter of this
report. A detailed budget table was included in the Plan for the activities to be
implemented after the end of the project. The budget for each activity to be continued
will derive from the responsible beneficiary’s resources, which is already been agreed
between the partners with the acceptance of the Plan. The ‘After-LIFE Conservation
Plan’ created in English and Greek. The English version of the Plan can be found in
Annex 7.3.2.
The project was also characterized by the long-term social and economic benefits (direct
and indirect) to the local communities through public awareness campaign and
participation of local communities in the conservation activities. The project developed a
series of measures promoting awareness among the local people about the value of
conservation and sustainable management of targeted habitat types within Natura 2000
sites and especially within RNFP. The local people started changing perception regarding
the value and the conservation of the two habitat types in their area. People living near
the targeted site started appreciating species that are not emblematic (e.g. Ziziphus lotus)
and understanding their contribution to the conservation of other flora and fauna species.
The project successfully applied the knowledge gained from previously implemented
LIFE projects in Cyprus (LIFE04 NAT/CY/00013) and Spain (LIFE00 NAT/E/007304),
on restoring/conserving or re-creating the priority habitat types *1520 and *5220.
This project provided EU added value as it contributes to the implementation of
Community policy and legislation on nature and biodiversity, in particular Directive
92/43/EEC, by supporting the effective management and protection of the Natura 2000
network, and two priority habitat types: Arborescent matorral with Zyziphus (*5220) and
Gypsum steppes (Gypsophiletalia) (*1520). Both habitats pose a conservation challenge
phytogeographically for the EU since they are restricted to the southwest and southeast
margins of the Euro-Mediterranean area. In Cyprus, both targeted priority habitats have a
patchy distribution, which is under serious threat and for which Cyprus holds a great
responsibility since it's the easternmost margin of their distribution in Europe. As this
project is a demonstrational one aims at the consolidation of a knowledge base for the
conservation of these habitats, which could be utilized by other EU countries, promoting
the wider conservation of these habitats types. The outcomes of the project (including
protocols created) could be utilized and replicated in other areas of Cyprus, Spain or
Italy. These are the only European countries that have included *5220 habitat type in
Natura 2000 sites. Best practices on germination and planting of Ziziphus lotus and the
accompany species of the habitat type *5220 can be utilized in similar areas for
restoration or re-creation purposes. Moreover, habitat type *1520 is limited to Cyprus and
Spain only. It is noted that, there is an ongoing communication between OUC and DF
with the Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología of Spain and an expression of interest of
submitting a HORIZON 2020 project proposal (MSCA-RISE) to promote the study of
gypsum ecosystems worldwide. The Report on protocols of seed storage, germination,
growth and outplanting of the keystone species already sent to Dr. Francisco Javier
Cabello Piñar (University of Almeria).
The project also contributed towards achieving the goals set by the Convention on
Biological Diversity and the European Commission Strategy to halt the loss of
biodiversity by 2020. In addition, it supported policies related to the protection of
Mediterranean regions such as MedSPA. The project can serve as a planning tool to the
50
Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment of Cyprus who is
responsible for the conservation and management of Natura 2000 sites. The project
addressed issues of national sustainable development as highlighted by the Goteborg
meeting (2001) and therefore contributes to the EU Strategy on Sustainable
Development. The project’s embedded participatory approach and multi-stakeholders’
communication strategy illustrate the commitment to the Aarhus Convention.
6. Comments on the financial report
The costs incurred during the whole project period (Sept 2013 – Feb 2017) of the LIFE-
RIZOELIA project correspond to 98.8% of the total initial project budget, as presented in
the table below, a percentage that in general corresponds to the technical completion of
the project. Overall some noted deviations from budget have to with reasons that have
been flagged from the beginning of the project (i.e. higher personnel rates, lower
requirements for travel expenses and savings in external services) and justified again here
below. These deviations however did not have an impact on the technical completion of
the project and furthermore lie within the €30,000 and 10% limits (as per LIFE 2012 CP)
on changes to the provisional project budget foreseen in one or more categories of
expenditure.
Moreover, during the final detailed review of all expenses, some corrections were made,
mainly on more accurate calculations of the personnel cost, especially with respect to the
employer contributions, which had a relatively small downward effect on amounts
previously reported. These corrections however, were deemed necessary for a more
accurate reflection of the actual project expenses.
The flagged issue of compliance with the 2% rule for public bodies, which occurred due
to the savings in direct expense categories like Travel and External Assistance, was
finally addressed by lowering the total funding rate requested for the whole project (from
75% to 74.1%) to the extent that all public beneficiaries contribute by 2% more than the
staff cost of public employees (permanent or with contracts before the start of the
project). The total personnel cost of the public beneficiaries that falls under this category
was €190,426 and the total own contribution of these beneficiaries is set at €194,235.
All required financial statements, as per the LIFE model financial statement for LIFE 12
projects, can be found as annexes (# 8) and on the DVD provided with the current report.