letter to judge hamner from alabama media group

1
1731 First Avenue North Birmingham, AL 35203 phone: 205.325.4444 The Birmingham News // PressRegister // The Huntsville Times // The Mississippi Press // Montgomery Tuscaloosa // Beaches // Birmingham magazine // Coastal Alabama Magazine // Gulflive.com Sept. 1, 2015 TO: Circuit Court Judge Elizabeth Hamner Tuscaloosa County Courthouse 714 Greensboro Ave. Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35401 RE: DR2015900426.00 Dear Judge Hamner, We are respectfully requesting that you unseal the records in the divorce case referenced above, filed Aug. 31, 2015, by Dianne Bentley against Robert Bentley in Tuscaloosa circuit court. Court records in divorce cases are usually public documents, and we believe that it is in the public interest that these documents pertaining to the sitting governor of Alabama be opened for public inspection. We disagree with the parties’ attorneys view: that the “defendant holds a prominent office in the state of Alabama , and it would be in the parties’ best interest that the public not be able to access the record in this divorce action.” In fact, we believe the opposite is true: the argument that these records should be open is even stronger than in the typical divorce case because they pertain to the highest elected official in the state. One who chooses to run for Governor knows that the electorate will justifiably scrutinize all aspects of his activities and background, including his family circumstances, religious beliefs, and ethical and moral codes. The Governor’s spouse knows this as well. Such transparency has long been recognized as essential to the ability of the citizenry to intelligently exercise its franchise in a democracy. It would seem quite anomalous for the court to afford the Governor and his wife the unusual privilege of availing themselves of the judicial system in secret proceedings, when that special treatment is (quite properly) not generally made available to citizens whose divorces are arguably of less public importance. Sincerely, Michelle Holmes Vice President, Content [email protected]

Upload: madison-underwood

Post on 13-Dec-2015

26.551 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The letter requests that documents in the Bentley divorce be unsealed.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Letter to Judge Hamner from Alabama Media Group

1731  First  Avenue  North    Birmingham,  AL  35203    phone:  205.325.4444  

 

 

The  Birmingham  News  //  Press-­‐Register  //  The  Huntsville  Times  //  The  Mississippi  Press  //  Montgomery  Tuscaloosa  //  Beaches  //  Birmingham  magazine  //  Coastal  Alabama  Magazine  //  Gulflive.com      

                   Sept.  1,  2015    TO:  Circuit  Court  Judge  Elizabeth  Hamner  Tuscaloosa  County  Courthouse  714  Greensboro  Ave.  Tuscaloosa,  Alabama  35401    

RE:  DR-­‐2015-­‐900426.00  

 

Dear  Judge  Hamner,  

We  are  respectfully  requesting  that  you  unseal  the  records  in  the  divorce  case  referenced  above,  filed  Aug.  31,  2015,  by  Dianne  Bentley  against  Robert  Bentley  in  Tuscaloosa  circuit  court.  

Court  records  in  divorce  cases  are  usually  public  documents,  and  we  believe  that  it  is  in  the  public  interest  that  these  documents  pertaining  to  the  sitting  governor  of  Alabama  be  opened  for  public  inspection.  

We  disagree  with  the  parties’  attorneys  view:  that  the  “defendant  holds  a  prominent  office  in  the  state  of  Alabama  ,  and  it  would  be  in  the  parties’  best  interest  that  the  public  not  be  able  to  access  the  record  in  this  divorce  action.”  

In  fact,  we  believe  the  opposite  is  true:  the  argument  that  these  records  should  be  open  is  even  stronger  than  in  the  typical  divorce  case  because  they  pertain  to  the  highest  elected  official  in  the  state.    

One  who  chooses  to  run  for  Governor  knows  that  the  electorate  will  justifiably  scrutinize  all  aspects  of  his  activities  and  background,  including  his  family  circumstances,  religious  beliefs,  and  ethical  and  moral  codes.    The  Governor’s  spouse  knows  this  as  well.    Such  transparency  has  long  been  recognized  as  essential  to  the  ability  of  the  citizenry  to  intelligently  exercise  its  franchise  in  a  democracy.    It  would  seem  quite  anomalous  for  the  court  to  afford  the  Governor  and  his  wife  the  unusual  privilege  of  availing  themselves  of  the  judicial  system  in  secret  proceedings,  when  that  special  treatment  is  (quite  properly)  not  generally  made  available  to  citizens  whose  divorces  are  arguably  of  less  public  importance.  

 

Sincerely,  

   Michelle  Holmes  Vice  President,  Content  [email protected]