leslie rogers hubble fellow california institute of technology [email protected] kepler science...

34
Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology [email protected] Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions of Sub-Neptune-Size Exoplanets

Upload: lindsey-russell

Post on 05-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Leslie RogersHubble Fellow

California Institute of [email protected]

Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013

Glimpsing the Compositions of Sub-Neptune-Size Exoplanets

Page 2: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Mp <124 M

Porb = 290 days

Borucki et al. (2012)Figure Credit: NASA/Ames/JPL-Caltech

Rocky

Volatile Rich?OR

Kepler-22b: Rp = 2.4 R

Page 3: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Six Years Ago

100% Silicate100% H2O

100% Iron

Seager et al. (2007) M-R Relations

Page 4: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Non-Kepler Planets

100% Silicate100% H2O

100% Iron

Seager et al. (2007) M-R Relations

Page 5: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Kepler Planets

100% Silicate100% H2O

100% Iron

Seager et al. (2007) M-R Relations

Page 6: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Masses & Radii of 49 Planets from KeplerMarcy et al. (2013) submitted

• Radial velocity follow-up observations of 22 sub-Neptune-size KOIs with Keck-HIRES

• Selection Criteria:– Planet candidates smaller than 4 REarth

– Predicted RV amplitude detectable (K > 1m s-1)– Stellar Properties: Kp < 13.5, Teff<6100K, vsini < 5 km s-1

• Results: – 42 Transiting Planets, 7 Non-Transiting planets in 22 planetary

systems– 16 transiting planets have strong mass measurements, rest have

marginal RV detections or mass upper limits

Page 7: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Kepler Planets

100% Silicate100% H2O

100% Iron

Seager et al. (2007) M-R Relations

Page 8: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

New Kepler Planet Masses from Keck RVs

100% Silicate100% H2O

100% Iron

Seager et al. (2007) M-R Relations Marcy et al. (in prep)

Page 9: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

New Kepler Planet Masses from Keck RVs

Page 10: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Which Planets Are Rocky?

Page 11: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Which Planets Are Rocky?

Page 12: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Which Planets Are Rocky?

Non-Rocky

Page 13: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Which Planets Are Rocky?

Potentially Rocky

Non-Rocky

Page 14: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Smaller Planets are DenserPotentially Rocky

Non-Rocky

How does the Fraction of Planets Dense Enough to be Rocky vary with Rp?

Page 15: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Model:

Page 16: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Mass

Radius

Page 17: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Mass

Radius

Page 18: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Simplest Model for frocky (Rp): Step Function

frocky(Rp) (Fraction of planets that are rocky)

1 model parameter:Rocky/Non-Rocky Radius Threshold

Page 19: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Step-Function Model:Radius Upper Limit for Rocky Planets

Rogers 2014 (submitted)

Page 20: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Step-Function Model:Radius Upper Limit for Rocky Planets

Median 1.48 +0.04

-0.05 R

Rogers 2014 (submitted)

Page 21: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Step-Function Model:Radius Upper Limit for Rocky Planets

Median 1.48 +0.04

-0.05 R

95% Confidence Upper Bound 1.59 +0.18

-0.05 R

Rogers 2014 (submitted)

Page 22: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Model #2 for frocky (Rp): Linear Transition

frocky(Rp) (Fraction of planets that are rocky)

2 model parameters:Rmid transition midpointDR transition width

Page 23: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Linear Transition Model:Radius Limits for Rocky / Non-Rocky Planets

R50% rocky = 1.48 +0.16

-0.50 R

< 1.61 R (95% conf.)

Rogers 2014 (submitted)

Page 24: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Linear Transition Model:Posterior Distribution for frocky(Rp)

p(frocky |R

p , da

ta)

Rogers 2014 (submitted)

Page 25: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Bayesian Evidence Prefers Simpler 1-parameter Step Function Model

Model 1: Step Function1 parameter

Model 2: Linear Transition2 parameters

Preferred E 1 ~ 5 E 2

Page 26: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Figure Credit: NASA/Ames/JPL-Caltech

Main Take Away: Most planets larger than 1.6 R are not Rocky.

Rocky

Volatile Rich?OR

Kepler-22b(Rp = 2.4 R):

Page 27: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Leslie RogersHubble Fellow

California Institute of [email protected]

Extra Slides

Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013

Page 28: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Incident Flux Dependent frocky?Non-Rocky

Potentially Rocky

100 101 104102 103

Page 29: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Smaller Planets are DenserPotentially Rocky

Non-Rocky

Page 30: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Linear Transition Model:Predictive Distribution of frocky(Rp)

Page 31: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Non-Rocky

Potentially Rocky

100% Silicate

Probability a Planet is Sufficiently Dense to be Rocky, procky

Seager et al. (2007) M-R Relations

Page 32: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Planets Detected both Dynamically and in Transit are Valuable!

Stellar Wobble Transits

Planet Mass Planet Radius

Planet Density

Page 33: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Super-Earth and Sub-Neptune Planets

Earth1 M

1 R

Uranus & Neptune15 M

4 R

Page 34: Leslie Rogers Hubble Fellow California Institute of Technology larogers@caltech.edu Kepler Science Conference II – November 4, 2013 Glimpsing the Compositions

Super-Earth and Sub-Neptune Planets

Earth1 M

1 R

Uranus & Neptune15 M

4 R

1.6 R