legal rhetoric syllabus2013 wcl 2013

Upload: coxfn

Post on 14-Apr-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    1/42

    Legal RhetoricHandbook

    Washington College of Law

    Fall 2013

  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    2/42

    Table of ContentsOn line version of this Handbook is available on TWEN Legal Rhetoric Main Page: reading

    assignments are hyperlinked.

    Syllabus ................................................................................................................................1

    Course Requirements and Policies.....................................................................................12

    Introduction to Legal Rhetoric........................................................................................... 17

    Legal Rhetoric Style Sheet..................................................................................................21

    Planning Strategies.............................................................................................................24

    The Basic Principles ..........................................................................................................25

    Revision Checklist .............................................................................................................28

    The Legal Process ..............................................................................................................30

    Using CREAC ....................................................................................................................31

    Umbrellas ...........................................................................................................................33

    Who Teaches the Course?...................................................................................................34

    Clumsy Words and Phrases.................................................................................................38

  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    3/42

    1

    SyllabusFall 2013

    Overview of the Semester

    Weeks 1-7: Writing a closed office memorandum: (Client 1).

    Students write a mini-memo (which serves as an umbrella for the full memo) and three draftsof the closed memo for Client 1 (final version due Week 7).

    Learning Goals: memo format and purpose, basic writing strategies (Basic Principles),knowledge of (but not doing) basic research (statutes and cases), basic citation form, analyzing a

    statute, writing legal analysis (CREAC; using strong topic sentences; organizing around topics),

    synthesizing rules from cases, professionalism.

    Weeks 7-12: Writing an office memorandum: (Client 2).Students research and write three drafts of an office memorandum for Client 2 (final version due

    Week 12); they also prepare a basic research plan (due Week 8) and an annotated outline (dueWeek 9) and an advice letter to Client 2 (due Week 13).

    Learning Goals: preparing a research plan, researching, preparing an annotated outline, andreinforcing skills from Weeks 1-7.

    Weeks 12-13: Introduction to advocacy writing.

    Students write one draft of the facts and argument for a Trial Court Memorandum (opposingor supporting a Motion to Dismiss) for Client 1 (due Week 13).

    Learning Goals: learning format and purpose of a Trial Court Memorandum, writing strategiesfor persuasive writing (characterizing facts and law, analogizing and distinguishing cases, etc.).

    Research Workshops in Weeks 2, 4, and 6.

  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    4/42

    2

    Syllabus

    Legal Rhetoric Orientation

    August 22, 23

    Overview of the Legal SystemThe Legal Discourse Community

    What Lawyers Write and What Makes It Good Writing

    Overview of the Legal Rhetoric CourseUsing the Online Course Materials

    Read for Week 1:

    Legal Rhetoric Handbook(TWEN Main page);

    Evans Sample Memo(TWEN Main page);

    Teaching Law:Legal Documents:

    LD2: Memorandums of LawLD3: Formal Requirements of a Memo

    Writing Process:WP2: Writing Process

    WP3: Creating Your Own Effective Writing Process

    WP13: Plagiarism and Ethics

    Editing and Citation:

    EC2: Strategies for Editing Grammar

    Teaching Law abbreviations: RS-Research Sources; RSt-Research Strategies; LD-LegalDocuments; LA-Legal Analysis; WP-Writing and Rewriting; EC-Editing and Citation

    http://lawschool.westlaw.com/DocForums/ViewSingleDocument.aspx?postingID=8782490&courseID=155084&forumDBID=713437http://lawschool.westlaw.com/DocForums/ViewSingleDocument.aspx?postingID=8782490&courseID=155084&forumDBID=713437http://lawschool.westlaw.com/DocForums/ViewSingleDocument.aspx?postingID=8721576&courseID=155084&forumDBID=713438http://lawschool.westlaw.com/DocForums/ViewSingleDocument.aspx?postingID=8721576&courseID=155084&forumDBID=713438http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/Formal%20Requirements/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/The%20Writing%20Process/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/The%20Writing%20Process/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/The%20Writing%20Process/CreatinganEffectiveWritingProcess/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/The%20Writing%20Process/CreatinganEffectiveWritingProcess/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/ethics.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/ethics.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Strategies%20for%20Editing/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Strategies%20for%20Editing/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/ethics.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/The%20Writing%20Process/CreatinganEffectiveWritingProcess/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/The%20Writing%20Process/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/Formal%20Requirements/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/http://lawschool.westlaw.com/DocForums/ViewSingleDocument.aspx?postingID=8721576&courseID=155084&forumDBID=713438http://lawschool.westlaw.com/DocForums/ViewSingleDocument.aspx?postingID=8782490&courseID=155084&forumDBID=713437
  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    5/42

    3

    Week 1: August 26

    In class: Introductions; review of course requirements and policies; using Planning Strategies;

    overview of a Legal Memorandum (Office Memo).

    DF presentation: Writing Professional Emails; Overview ofBluebook.

    Read for Class 2:Reread inLegal Rhetoric Handbook, Basic Principles,Legal Rhetoric Style Sheet,

    Using CREAC,andUmbrellas.

    Teaching Law:

    Legal Documents:LD4: Memos--Headings

    LD5: MemosQuestions PresentedLD6: MemosBrief Answer

    LD7: MemosStatement of Facts

    LD8: MemosDiscussionLD9: Memos--Conclusion

    Legal Analysis:

    LA2: Legal AnalysisIntroductionLA3: Understanding Legal Rules

    LA6: Statutory Language

    LA7: Statutory Interpretation

    Editing and Citation:

    EC4: Active v. Passive VoiceEC22: Nominalizations

    EC28: Sentence Fragments

    EC30: Short Sentences

    EC32: Strong Subject-Verb Combinations

    Write for Week 2: Draft of fact section for office memo.

    http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/Formal%20Requirements/Heading/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/Formal%20Requirements/Heading/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/Formal%20Requirements/Question%20Presented/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/Formal%20Requirements/Question%20Presented/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/Formal%20Requirements/Brief%20Answers/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/Formal%20Requirements/Brief%20Answers/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/Formal%20Requirements/Statement%20of%20Facts/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/Formal%20Requirements/Statement%20of%20Facts/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/Formal%20Requirements/Discussion/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/Formal%20Requirements/Discussion/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/Formal%20Requirements/Conclusion/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/Formal%20Requirements/Conclusion/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalAnalysis/Introduction%20-%20Gathering%20and%20Analysing%20the%20Facts/#aa1http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalAnalysis/Introduction%20-%20Gathering%20and%20Analysing%20the%20Facts/#aa1http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalAnalysis/Understandinglegalrule/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalAnalysis/Understandinglegalrule/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalAnalysis/Statutory%20Language/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalAnalysis/Statutory%20Language/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalAnalysis/Statutory%20Interpretation/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalAnalysis/Statutory%20Interpretation/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Active%20vs.%20Passive%20Voice/?dvxzvisto=1http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Active%20vs.%20Passive%20Voice/?dvxzvisto=1http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Avoid%20Nominalizations/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Avoid%20Nominalizations/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Avoid%20Sentence%20Fragments/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Avoid%20Sentence%20Fragments/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Use%20short%20sentences/useshortsentences.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Use%20short%20sentences/useshortsentences.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Use%20strong%20subjective%20Verb/usestrongsubjectverb.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Use%20strong%20subjective%20Verb/usestrongsubjectverb.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Use%20strong%20subjective%20Verb/usestrongsubjectverb.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Use%20short%20sentences/useshortsentences.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Avoid%20Sentence%20Fragments/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Avoid%20Nominalizations/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Active%20vs.%20Passive%20Voice/?dvxzvisto=1http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalAnalysis/Statutory%20Interpretation/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalAnalysis/Statutory%20Language/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalAnalysis/Understandinglegalrule/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalAnalysis/Introduction%20-%20Gathering%20and%20Analysing%20the%20Facts/#aa1http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/Formal%20Requirements/Conclusion/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/Formal%20Requirements/Discussion/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/Formal%20Requirements/Statement%20of%20Facts/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/Formal%20Requirements/Brief%20Answers/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/Formal%20Requirements/Question%20Presented/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/memos/Formal%20Requirements/Heading/
  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    6/42

    4

    Research in Week 2: Research Workshop: Statutory Research

    Read for Workshop 1:Teaching Law:

    Research Sources:RS2: Importance of Legal Research

    RS3: Overview of Types of Legal Authority - Primary Law

    RS4: Overview of Types of Legal Authority - Secondary Sources

    RS6: Overview of Process and StrategyRS9: Federal Congress and Federal Statutes

    RS16: State Legislatures and Statutes

    RS45: Quick Reference - Statutes

    Research Strategies:

    RSt6: Primary Law v. Secondary SourcesRSt7: Stare Decisis

    RSt8: Binding Law vs. Persuasive Law

    RSt44: Quick Reference - Binding vs. Persuasive LawRSt22: How a Bill Becomes a Law

    RSt11: Book Research vs. Online Research - Strategies for Book Research

    RSt12: Book Research vs. Online Research - Strategies for Online

    Research

    RSt19: Finding Constitutions and StatutesRSt49: Quick Reference - Finding Statutes

    RSt49a: Checklist - Strategies for Researching Statutes

    Assignment:

    Research Assignment 1 (will be assigned in Workshop 1; due at beginning of regularclass, Week 4).

    In library: DF-arranged library tour.

    Week 2: September 2 (Labor Day classes will be rescheduled for later in the week.)

    In class: Basic Principles and Revision Checklist; the legal system; writing an office

    memorandum; structured peer review of fact section; analyzing a statute; introduction toCREAC; umbrella sections.

    http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/TheImportanceofEffectiveLegalResearch.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/TheImportanceofEffectiveLegalResearch.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/OverviewofTypesofLegalAuthorityPrimaryLaw.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/OverviewofTypesofLegalAuthorityPrimaryLaw.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/OverviewofTypesofLegalAuthority.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/OverviewofTypesofLegalAuthority.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/OverviewofProcessandStrategy.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/OverviewofProcessandStrategy.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Primary%20Resources/Congress/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Primary%20Resources/Congress/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/PrimaryLawStateLaw/Legislatures/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/PrimaryLawStateLaw/Legislatures/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Cheat%20Sheets/Statutes/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Cheat%20Sheets/Statutes/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/The%20American%20Legal%20System/Primary%20Law%20vs.%20Secondary%20Sources/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/The%20American%20Legal%20System/Primary%20Law%20vs.%20Secondary%20Sources/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/The%20American%20Legal%20System/StareDecisis/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/The%20American%20Legal%20System/StareDecisis/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/The%20American%20Legal%20System/Binding%20Law%20vs.%20Persuasive%20Law/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/The%20American%20Legal%20System/Binding%20Law%20vs.%20Persuasive%20Law/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/Binding%20vs.%20Persuasive%20Law/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/Binding%20vs.%20Persuasive%20Law/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Primary%20Resources/Congress/How%20a%20Bill%20Becomes%20a%20Law/howabillbecomesalaw.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Primary%20Resources/Congress/How%20a%20Bill%20Becomes%20a%20Law/howabillbecomesalaw.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Book%20Research%20vs.%20On-Line%20Research/Strategies%20for%20Book%20Research/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Book%20Research%20vs.%20On-Line%20Research/Strategies%20for%20Book%20Research/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Book%20Research%20vs.%20On-Line%20Research/Strategies%20for%20On-Line%20Research/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Book%20Research%20vs.%20On-Line%20Research/Strategies%20for%20On-Line%20Research/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Book%20Research%20vs.%20On-Line%20Research/Strategies%20for%20On-Line%20Research/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Strategies%20for%20Particular%20Sources/Finding%20Statutes/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Strategies%20for%20Particular%20Sources/Finding%20Statutes/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/Finding%20Statutes/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/Finding%20Statutes/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/StrategiesforResearchingStatutes/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/StrategiesforResearchingStatutes/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/StrategiesforResearchingStatutes/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/Finding%20Statutes/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Strategies%20for%20Particular%20Sources/Finding%20Statutes/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Book%20Research%20vs.%20On-Line%20Research/Strategies%20for%20On-Line%20Research/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Book%20Research%20vs.%20On-Line%20Research/Strategies%20for%20On-Line%20Research/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Book%20Research%20vs.%20On-Line%20Research/Strategies%20for%20Book%20Research/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Primary%20Resources/Congress/How%20a%20Bill%20Becomes%20a%20Law/howabillbecomesalaw.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/Binding%20vs.%20Persuasive%20Law/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/The%20American%20Legal%20System/Binding%20Law%20vs.%20Persuasive%20Law/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/The%20American%20Legal%20System/StareDecisis/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/The%20American%20Legal%20System/Primary%20Law%20vs.%20Secondary%20Sources/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Cheat%20Sheets/Statutes/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/PrimaryLawStateLaw/Legislatures/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Primary%20Resources/Congress/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/OverviewofProcessandStrategy.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/OverviewofTypesofLegalAuthority.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/OverviewofTypesofLegalAuthorityPrimaryLaw.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/TheImportanceofEffectiveLegalResearch.htm
  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    7/42

    5

    DF presentation: Statutory Citation; Active v. Passive; Subject-Verb-Direct Object Order;

    Controlling Sentence Length; Five-minute editing quiz.

    Read for Class 3:

    Bluebook, Rule 10.

    Teaching Law:

    Editing and Citation:

    EC7: ApostrophesEC11: Colons and Semi-Colons

    EC12: Commas

    Legal Analysis:

    LA8: Understanding Common Law

    LA9: Case Analysis

    Write for Week 3: Mini-Memo (due week 3).

    Week 3: September 9

    Mini-Memo due at beginning of class; bring two copies (or submit one electronically and

    bring one copy for use in classfollow instructors directions).

    In class: Discussion and peer review of Mini-Memo; discussion of predictive writing and

    research strategies; learning to write rule-based reasoning; synthesizing Rules from cases;relationship of statutory and case law; organizing the Discussion; CREAC structure using cases.

    DF presentation: Case Citation I: Rule 10: Case Names; Five-minute editing quiz.

    Read for Class 4:

    Teaching Law:

    Writing Process:

    WP8: Managing Your TimeWP9: Overcoming Writers BlockWP15: Rewriting

    WP16: RewritingContentWP17: Large-Scale OrganizationWP18: Paragraph Organization and Legal Analysis

    WP19: Sentence Structure

    WP20: Conciseness

    http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Apostrophes/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Apostrophes/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Colons%20and%20Semicolons/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Colons%20and%20Semicolons/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Commas/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalAnalysis/Understandingcommonlaw/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalAnalysis/Understandingcommonlaw/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalAnalysis/Case%20Analysis/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Writing/Managing%20your%20time/managetime.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Writing/Managing%20your%20time/managetime.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Writing/Overcoming%20writer%20block/writersblock.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Writing/Overcoming%20writer%20block/writersblock.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Rewriting/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Rewriting/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Rewriting/Content/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Rewriting/Content/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Rewriting/Large-scale%20organization/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Rewriting/Large-scale%20organization/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Rewriting/Analysis%20and%20Mid-Level%20Organization/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Rewriting/Analysis%20and%20Mid-Level%20Organization/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Rewriting/Small-Scale%20Organization/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Rewriting/Small-Scale%20Organization/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Rewriting/Conciseness/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Rewriting/Conciseness/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Rewriting/Small-Scale%20Organization/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Rewriting/Analysis%20and%20Mid-Level%20Organization/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Rewriting/Large-scale%20organization/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Rewriting/Content/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Rewriting/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Writing/Overcoming%20writer%20block/writersblock.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Writing/Managing%20your%20time/managetime.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalAnalysis/Case%20Analysis/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalAnalysis/Understandingcommonlaw/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Commas/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Colons%20and%20Semicolons/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/editingCitation/Editing/Grammar%20and%20Legal%20Use%20Rules/Apostrophes/
  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    8/42

    6

    Write for Week 4 : Expand and revise Mini-Memo into full memo adding cases (and

    synthesized Rules) and using full office memorandum format; complete draft due week 4.

    Research in Week 4: Workshop 2: Case Research

    Read for Workshop 2:Teaching Law:

    Research Sources:

    RS10: Primary Law Federal Law Federal Courts and Cases

    RS11: United States Supreme CourtRS12: Federal Courts of Appeals Circuit Court Map

    RS13: Federal District Courts District Court Map

    RS17: Primary Law State Law State Courts and CasesRS42: Quick Reference Courts and Cases

    Research Strategies:

    RSt20: Finding CasesRSt10: Book Research vs. Online Research Topic and Key Number

    SearchesRSt25: Updating the Law

    RSt45: Quick Reference West Key Number System

    RSt51: Quick Reference Finding Cases

    RSt46: Quick Reference Updating the LawRSt51a: Checklist Strategies for Researching Cases

    Assignment: Research Assignment 2 (will be assigned in Workshop 2; due in regular Rhetoricclass in Week 6).

    Week 4: September 16Draft 1 of Memo 1 due at beginning of class.Research Assignment 1 due at beginning of class.

    In class: Peer review of drafts using Revision Checklist and self-grading guidelines; discussion

    of strengths and weaknesses of drafts; more work on reading and synthesizing cases/rules; focuson Synthesized Rules from cases; umbrella section; CREAC structure; topic sentences.

    DF presentation: Case Citation II: Reporters, Date Parentheticals, Court Information; CommonWriting Errors (Legal Rhetoric Style Sheet); Five-minute editing quiz.

    Write for Week 5: Second draft of Memo 1 (due in conference Week 5.)

    Learning Goals for Memo 1: memo format and purpose, basic writing strategies (BasicPrinciples), knowledge of (but not doing) basic research (statutes and cases), basic citation form,

    http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Primary%20Resources/Courts/federalcourts.htm?dvxzvisto=1http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Primary%20Resources/Courts/federalcourts.htm?dvxzvisto=1http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Primary%20Resources/CourntsandCases/SupremeCourt/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Primary%20Resources/CourntsandCases/SupremeCourt/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Primary%20Resources/CourntsandCases/CircuitCourtMap/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Primary%20Resources/CourntsandCases/CircuitCourtMap/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Primary%20Resources/CourntsandCases/DistrictCourtMap/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Primary%20Resources/CourntsandCases/DistrictCourtMap/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/PrimaryLawStateLaw/Courts/statecourts.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/PrimaryLawStateLaw/Courts/statecourts.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Cheat%20Sheets/Cases/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Strategies%20for%20Particular%20Sources/Finding%20Cases/#1aa5http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Strategies%20for%20Particular%20Sources/Finding%20Cases/#1aa5http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Book%20Research%20vs.%20On-Line%20Research/The%20Key%20Numbering%20System/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Book%20Research%20vs.%20On-Line%20Research/The%20Key%20Numbering%20System/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Book%20Research%20vs.%20On-Line%20Research/The%20Key%20Numbering%20System/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Updating%20the%20Law/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Updating%20the%20Law/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/West%20Key%20Number%20System/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/West%20Key%20Number%20System/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/Finding%20Cases/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/Finding%20Cases/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/Updating%20the%20Law/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/Updating%20the%20Law/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/StrategiesforResearchingCases/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/StrategiesforResearchingCases/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/Updating%20the%20Law/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/Finding%20Cases/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/West%20Key%20Number%20System/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Updating%20the%20Law/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Book%20Research%20vs.%20On-Line%20Research/The%20Key%20Numbering%20System/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Book%20Research%20vs.%20On-Line%20Research/The%20Key%20Numbering%20System/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Strategies%20for%20Particular%20Sources/Finding%20Cases/#1aa5http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Cheat%20Sheets/Cases/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/PrimaryLawStateLaw/Courts/statecourts.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Primary%20Resources/CourntsandCases/DistrictCourtMap/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Primary%20Resources/CourntsandCases/CircuitCourtMap/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Primary%20Resources/CourntsandCases/SupremeCourt/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Primary%20Resources/Courts/federalcourts.htm?dvxzvisto=1
  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    9/42

    7

    analyzing a statute, writing legal analysis (CREAC; topic sentences; organizing around topics),

    synthesizing rules from cases, professionalism.

    Sign up for conferences (review preparation for conferences; see Week 5).

    Week 5:September 23: No regular classesmandatory conferences.

    Individual conferences: prepare for your conference by writing a complete revised second draft

    of Memo 1, writing a list of questions (seeUsing Draftsin Course Requirements and Policies

    for kinds of questions) for your instructor, and highlighting portions of the draft that you want todiscuss. Follow your professors instructions for submitting these materials. Conferences should

    last about twenty minutes. Failure to write and deliver a complete draft or to show up for the

    conference will result in the lowering of your grade in the course.

    Blackout Period: There is a 24-hour blackout period before your final version of Memo 1 is

    due, during which you may not consult with instructors, the DFs, or the Writing Fellows.

    Write for Week 6: Third draft of Memo 1 (due at beginning of class Week 7).

    Research in Week 6: Workshop 3: Secondary SourcesRead for Workshop 3:

    Teaching Law:

    Research Sources:RS19: Secondary Sources

    RS20: Secondary Sources - Legal EncyclopediasRS21: Secondary Sources - American Law ReportsRS22: Secondary Sources - Hornbooks and Treatises

    RS23: Secondary Sources - Law Reviews

    RS24: Secondary Sources - Restatements

    RS44: Quick Reference Secondary Sources

    Assignment: Research Assignment 3 (will be assigned in Workshop 3; due Week 8).

    Week 6: September 30:Draft 3 of Memo 1 due at beginning of class; Research Assignment 2 due at beginning ofclass.

    DF presentation: Alterations, Omissions, Block Quotations, Context Paragraphs.

    http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Secondary%20Resources/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Secondary%20Resources/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Secondary+Resources/Legal+Encyclopedias/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Secondary+Resources/Legal+Encyclopedias/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Secondary%20Resources/American%20Law%20Reports/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Secondary%20Resources/Treatises%20and%20Hornbooks/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Secondary%20Resources/Law%20Reviews/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Secondary+Resources/Restatements/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Cheat%20Sheets/Secondary%20Sources/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Cheat%20Sheets/Secondary%20Sources/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Secondary+Resources/Restatements/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Secondary%20Resources/Law%20Reviews/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Secondary%20Resources/Treatises%20and%20Hornbooks/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Secondary%20Resources/American%20Law%20Reports/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Secondary+Resources/Legal+Encyclopedias/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchSources/Secondary%20Resources/
  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    10/42

    8

    In class: Structured in-class peer review of draftscome to class with specific questions: focus

    on umbrella sections, synthesized Rules (R of CREAC), Explanation (E of CREAC) sectionsorganized by topics (rather than by cases) with strong topic sentences, specific analogizing and

    distinguishing in Application (A of CREAC) sections; deeper reading of cases.

    Write: Final version of Memo 1; due at beginning of Class 7.

    Week 7: October 7Final version of Memo 1 due at beginning of class.

    In class: Self-evaluation of performance on Memo 1set goals for improvement; meeting withClient 1 to report results and give advice; write in-class email response to client email; Client 2

    interview; review of memo format and requirements; CREAC structure.

    DF presentation: Signals and Explanatory Parentheticals; Review of Revision Checklist.

    Write for Week 8: Basic Research Plan and preliminary results that must include any

    statute(s) and at least two case briefs (due in writing in class week 8).

    Draft of Fact Section for Memo 2.

    Read for Class 8:

    Teaching Law:

    Writing Process:WP12: Organizing Before You Write

    DF Workshop on Research offered this week (DF will announce time and place).

    Research Plan (Week 8):

    Read for Research Plan:

    Teaching Law:

    Research Strategies:RSt42: Checklist Initial Research

    RSt43: Checklist Continuing Research

    RSt16: Research Strategies Taking Notes

    RSt17: Research Strategies Deciding When to Stop

    http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Writing/Organizing%20Before%20You%20Write/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/InitialResearch/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/InitialResearch/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/ContinuingResearch/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/ContinuingResearch/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Strategies%20for%20the%20Research%20Process/Taking%20Notes/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Strategies%20for%20the%20Research%20Process/Taking%20Notes/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Strategies%20for%20the%20Research%20Process/Deciding%20When%20to%20Stop/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Strategies%20for%20the%20Research%20Process/Deciding%20When%20to%20Stop/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Strategies%20for%20the%20Research%20Process/Deciding%20When%20to%20Stop/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Strategies%20for%20the%20Research%20Process/Taking%20Notes/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/ContinuingResearch/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/researchStrategies/Cheat%20Sheets/InitialResearch/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Writing/Organizing%20Before%20You%20Write/
  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    11/42

    9

    Week 8: October 14

    Basic Research Plan and case briefs for Memo 2 due at beginning of class; submit two

    copies (or per instructor).

    Research Assignment 3 due at beginning of class.

    In class: Discuss draft of facts and preliminary research; refine basic research plan; revise basic

    research plan into annotated outline; draft issues; discuss lawstrengths and weaknesses of

    clients case; in small groups, work on Discussion (CREAC) and counter-analysis.

    DFpresentation: Secondary Sources; Avoiding Clumsy Words and Phrases.

    Research for Week 9: Complete research for Client 2s problem.

    Write for Week 9: Annotated Outline of Memo 2 (it must include all research for memo) dueat the beginning of class week 9. Bring two copies.

    Week 9: October 21Annotated Outline due at beginning of class. Bring two copies (or per instructor).

    In class: Role-playing: meeting with supervisor to discuss research (research must be completeat this point);discuss forms of reasoning and how to use them; reading cases thoroughly;

    recognizing forms of reasoning; review rule synthesis.

    DF presentation: Review of Short Citation Forms;BluebookProblem Areas.

    Write for Week 10: Draft 1 of Memo 2.

    Learning Goals for Memo 2: Reinforcing all Learning Goals from Memo 1, finding and

    using research materials, using research plans and annotated outlines to prepare drafts, using

    drafts effectively.

    Week 10: October 28Memo 1 returned.Draft 1 of Memo 2 due at beginning of class; bring two copies (or per instructor).

    In class: Structured self-revision in class and peer review; working on Question Presented and

    Brief Answer; rule synthesis; CREAC structure.

  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    12/42

    10

    Write for Week 11: Draft 2 of Memo 2; turn in with focused questions.

    Week 11: November 4Draft 2 of Memo 2 due at beginning of class.

    In class: Instructor and peer review of Draft 2.

    Write for Week 12: Final version of Memo 2 (due at beginning of class week 12).

    DF Workshop on Citation offered this week (DF will announce time and place).

    Review for Exam:

    Teaching Law:

    Research Sources Quizzes:

    Congress and Federal StatutesFederal Courts and Federal Cases

    Secondary Sources

    State Courts and State CasesState Legislatures and Statutes

    Blackout Period: There is a 48-hour blackout period before your final version of Memo 2is due, during which you may not consult with instructors, the DFs, or the Writing Fellows.

    Week 12: November 11Final version of Office Memo 2 due at beginning of class.

    In class: Advice letter format; introduction to advocacy writing: reconsidering audience andpurpose; characterizing facts and law; introduction to a Trial Court Memorandum; reflect on

    personal use of strategies for improvement from week 6.

    Read for Week 13:

    Evans Annotated Advice Letter(on TWEN)

    Evans Trial Court MemosSupportingandOpposinga Motion

    Teaching Law:

    Legal Documents:

    LD56: MotionsLD57A: Formal Requirements of Motions

    LD57C: Memorandum of Points and Authorities (Memo to the Court)

    LD59: Client Letters

    http://teachinglaw.bna.com/teachinglaw/self_assessments/Diana/CongressandFederalStatutes.aspxhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/teachinglaw/self_assessments/Diana/CongressandFederalStatutes.aspxhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/teachinglaw/self_assessments/Diana/FederalCourtsandCases.aspxhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/teachinglaw/self_assessments/Diana/FederalCourtsandCases.aspxhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/teachinglaw/self_assessments/Diana/SecondarySources.aspxhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/teachinglaw/self_assessments/Diana/SecondarySources.aspxhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/teachinglaw/self_assessments/Diana/StateCourtsandCases.aspxhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/teachinglaw/self_assessments/Diana/StateCourtsandCases.aspxhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/teachinglaw/self_assessments/Diana/StateLegislaturesandStatutes.aspxhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/teachinglaw/self_assessments/Diana/StateLegislaturesandStatutes.aspxhttps://lawschool.westlaw.com/docforums/viewsingledocument.aspx?postingid=8735723&courseid=155084https://lawschool.westlaw.com/docforums/viewsingledocument.aspx?postingid=8735723&courseid=155084http://lawschool.westlaw.com/DocForums/ViewSingleDocument.aspx?postingID=8723896&courseID=155084http://lawschool.westlaw.com/DocForums/ViewSingleDocument.aspx?postingID=8723896&courseID=155084http://lawschool.westlaw.com/DocForums/ViewSingleDocument.aspx?postingID=8723896&courseID=155084http://lawschool.westlaw.com/DocForums/ViewSingleDocument.aspx?postingID=8721579&courseID=155084http://lawschool.westlaw.com/DocForums/ViewSingleDocument.aspx?postingID=8721579&courseID=155084http://lawschool.westlaw.com/DocForums/ViewSingleDocument.aspx?postingID=8721579&courseID=155084http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/Pleadings%20and%20Motions/Motions/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/Pleadings%20and%20Motions/Motions/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/Pleadings%20and%20Motions/Motions/Formal%20Requirements%20of%20a%20Motion/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/Pleadings%20and%20Motions/Motions/Formal%20Requirements%20of%20a%20Motion/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/Pleadings%20and%20Motions/Motions/Formal%20Requirements%20of%20a%20Motion/The%20Memorandum%20of%20Points%20and%20Authorities.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/Client%20Letters/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/Client%20Letters/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/Client%20Letters/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/Pleadings%20and%20Motions/Motions/Formal%20Requirements%20of%20a%20Motion/The%20Memorandum%20of%20Points%20and%20Authorities.htmhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/Pleadings%20and%20Motions/Motions/Formal%20Requirements%20of%20a%20Motion/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/legalDocuments/Pleadings%20and%20Motions/Motions/http://lawschool.westlaw.com/DocForums/ViewSingleDocument.aspx?postingID=8721579&courseID=155084http://lawschool.westlaw.com/DocForums/ViewSingleDocument.aspx?postingID=8723896&courseID=155084https://lawschool.westlaw.com/docforums/viewsingledocument.aspx?postingid=8735723&courseid=155084http://teachinglaw.bna.com/teachinglaw/self_assessments/Diana/StateLegislaturesandStatutes.aspxhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/teachinglaw/self_assessments/Diana/StateCourtsandCases.aspxhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/teachinglaw/self_assessments/Diana/SecondarySources.aspxhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/teachinglaw/self_assessments/Diana/FederalCourtsandCases.aspxhttp://teachinglaw.bna.com/teachinglaw/self_assessments/Diana/CongressandFederalStatutes.aspx
  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    13/42

    11

    Writing Process:

    WP21: Persuasive WritingWP22: Moving from Objective to Persuasive Writing

    WP23: Designing the Theory of the Case

    WP24: Crafting the Fact SectionWP25: Drafting the Argument Section

    WP26: Using Effective Sentence Structure and Word Choice

    Write for Week 13: Advice Letter to Client 2 (with a partner);

    Statement of Facts for Trial Court Memorandum on Closed Memo case;

    (both due in class week 13).

    Week 13: November 18Advice Letter and Statement of Facts due at beginning of class.

    In class: More advocacy writing: reading cases to make an argument; characterizing the law;writing persuasive topic sentences; arguing a motion.

    Write in class: Argument section of Trial Court Memorandum in Client 1s case (workingin groups with a sample Office Memo 1 selected by professor).

    Research, Citation, and WritingExamNovember 22 (day students);

    November 23 (evening students).

    Monday, November 18Legal Rhetoric professors argue the motion for the parties in Memo 1.

    Graded Memo 2 will be returned at the end of the first class next semester. If you would like the

    memo returned sooner, you may give your instructor a stamped self-addressed large envelope by

    December 12. No memos will be mailed or returned in any way until after the last 1L final exam.

    Monday, November 25Showcase Argument for Motion in Closed Memo case.

    http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Persuasive%20Writing/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Persuasive%20Writing/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Persuasive%20Writing/Moving%20from%20Objective%20to%20Persuasive%20Writing/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Persuasive%20Writing/Moving%20from%20Objective%20to%20Persuasive%20Writing/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Persuasive%20Writing/Designing%20the%20Theory%20of%20the%20Case/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Persuasive%20Writing/Designing%20the%20Theory%20of%20the%20Case/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Persuasive%20Writing/Crafting%20the%20Fact%20Section/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Persuasive%20Writing/Crafting%20the%20Fact%20Section/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Persuasive%20Writing/Drafting%20the%20Argument%20Section/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Persuasive%20Writing/Drafting%20the%20Argument%20Section/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Persuasive%20Writing/Using%20Effective%20Sentence%20Structure%20and%20Word%20Choice/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Persuasive%20Writing/Using%20Effective%20Sentence%20Structure%20and%20Word%20Choice/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Persuasive%20Writing/Drafting%20the%20Argument%20Section/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Persuasive%20Writing/Crafting%20the%20Fact%20Section/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Persuasive%20Writing/Designing%20the%20Theory%20of%20the%20Case/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Persuasive%20Writing/Moving%20from%20Objective%20to%20Persuasive%20Writing/http://teachinglaw.bna.com/TeachingLaw/Courses/LegalRsrchWriting/DianaDonahoe/writingRewriting/Persuasive%20Writing/
  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    14/42

    12

    Course Requirements and Policies

    Attendance

    Students must attend all classes. Absences will adversely affect the grade and can result in failingthe course. Any absence from a research workshop will require the completion of an extra make-

    up assignment in order to pass the course.

    Class PreparationStudents are expected to do all the reading assigned for class and to come to class prepared todiscuss it. The on-line syllabus has hyperlinks to many of the reading assignments.

    AssignmentsTimeliness

    Students must turn in all assignments, including drafts, on time. Failure to turn in an assignment

    will result in failure in the course. The due dates for the assignments are listed in the syllabus,and assignments are due at the beginning of class or they will be considered late. All late

    assignments that are not turned in during class must be turned in at the Legal Rhetoric Office.

    Late assignments that are turned in within 24 hours are penalized 10 percent. Late assignments

    that are turned in after 24 hours receive no credit, but must be turned in to pass the course.

    Proofreading

    Students must thoroughly proofread all assignments, including drafts, before handing them in.Any assignment that contains more than four proofreading errors will be returned without further

    assessment and will not be counted as handed in until it is corrected (students are responsible for

    checking their email after an assignment is turned in to be sure that it is not returned for

    proofreading errors). The paper must be resubmitted within 24 hours to receive credit for thecourse. You may not make substantive changes if your paper is returned for proofreading errors.

    The paper will be penalized 15 points each time it is returned for proofreading.

    Drafts

    A draft that you submit is not a rough draftit is your best effort, including on citation

    forms, at that point in time. It should not, in fact, be your very first draft, but rather the first draftthat you are showing to someone else. All drafts must be complete or they will not be counted asturned in and will be returned for completion and counted as late. Drafts will be checked for

    sufficiency immediately during the class. Students must turn in all assignments to pass thecourse.

    TextsThe reading materials for the course are found atteachinglaw.bna.com. You need to log on to

    the site and purchase the program. You also need to purchase The Bluebook: A Uniform System

    of Citation, 19th edition (2010).

    https://essential.bna.com/login/signin?msg=deny&url=http%3A%2F%2Fteachinglaw.bna.com%2FMembership%2FLogin%3Fdvxzvisto%3D1&lddty=-518&pcv=https://essential.bna.com/login/signin?msg=deny&url=http%3A%2F%2Fteachinglaw.bna.com%2FMembership%2FLogin%3Fdvxzvisto%3D1&lddty=-518&pcv=https://essential.bna.com/login/signin?msg=deny&url=http%3A%2F%2Fteachinglaw.bna.com%2FMembership%2FLogin%3Fdvxzvisto%3D1&lddty=-518&pcv=https://essential.bna.com/login/signin?msg=deny&url=http%3A%2F%2Fteachinglaw.bna.com%2FMembership%2FLogin%3Fdvxzvisto%3D1&lddty=-518&pcv=
  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    15/42

    13

    The following books are recommended if you want a style manual that helps with usage,

    grammar, and punctuation beyond that available on Teaching Law (the books are available onAmazon; also you may find a few copies in the small Rhetoric library in the Rhetoric conference

    room that you may consult):

    Richard C. Wydick, Plain English for Lawyers, 5th ed. (2005).

    Ian Gallacher,A Form and Style Manual for Lawyers (2005).

    Strunk and White, The Elements of Style (paper, 2008).

    Anne Enquist and Laurel Currie Oates,Just Writing: Grammar, Punctuation, and Style for the

    Legal Writer, 3d ed. (2009).

    Research CurriculumThe research portion of the class has several different facets. First, we will assign readings in

    teachinglaw.com to present concepts and search strategies. These are mandatory and essential toyour developing understanding of legal research and completion of the required exercises.

    Second, we will have three mandatory Research Workshops in Weeks 2, 4, and 6. The specificroom, date, and time information is on TWEN; the Workshops are arranged according to

    doctrinal sections. At the Research Workshops, we will guide you in small groups as you workon a set of exercises designed to practice strategies learned in the readings. Bring your laptop and

    passwords (teachinglaw/Lexis/Westlaw) to each Research Workshop. Third, after each

    Workshop you will get a problem set. The problem sets are designed to reinforce yourunderstanding of research strategies. You will have two weeks to complete each problem set and

    must work independently on the assignments. Fourth, you must complete mandatory Lexis and

    Westlaw training before October 18, 2013. Lexis and Westlaw representatives will set upseveral different live and webinar training options so that you can attend the training at your

    convenience. Finally, the exam in November will have a significant research component in order

    to ensure that you have mastered the material. Our approach present, practice, reinforce, andtest is designed to equip you both for Rhetoric assignments in the months ahead and for theactual practice of law.

    Using DraftsThe Legal Rhetoric course is designed to teach students how to use drafts on their own. To that

    end, students are introduced to a variety of tools: Planning Strategies, Revision Checklist, Basic

    Principles, checklists in the texts, handouts, etc. Peer review and in-class global comments aboutdrafts in general can also be fruitfully used in the revision process. In law practice, drafts are

    used by the writers themselves to improve the final product. One, but only one, source of input

    (in the class, but obviously not in practice) is the instructors comments. These comments come

    on some drafts, after students have redrafted at least once, on the grading sheets that accompanygraded papers, and in conferences. It is never the instructors job to read line-by-line and revise

    and edit a students work, just as it would not be the job of a supervising attorney in a legal job.That responsibility resides with the student, including the responsibility to transfer comments

    from one section of a draft to another. Instructors respond to drafts on a macro level and respond

    to specific questions and uncertainties that a student may have. The Deans Fellow, as well, canrespond in a macro fashion to drafts.

  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    16/42

    14

    In any case, the quality of the draft and the questions a student poses about it will greatly

    determine the quality of the feedback. No one can do much with a hastily written, incompletedraft or vague questions, such as is this okay? Good questions are along the lines of these: I

    am struggling with how many facts I should put in the Question Presented. Have I struck the

    right balance? Id like to discuss the difference between the Brief Answer and the Conclusion.Mine seem repetitive. I know from class exercises that Im struggling with the active/passive

    voice. Can we work through a few examples? Notice that these questions demonstrate that the

    student-writer has thought about drafting choices. Self-editing and conscious selection of writing

    strategies are the hallmarks of good legal writing.

    GradingThe course grade is determined by grades on the individual assignments, the overall quality of

    the other assignments, the grade on the research and writing final, and class participation: Memo

    1 (closed), 20%; Memo 2 (open), 35%; Research, Citation, and Writing Strategy Exam, 15%;Advice Letter,10%; Class Participation and Professionalism, 10%; Other Assignments, 10%.

    Failure to complete both the Lexis and Westlaw training units will result in a 5% deduction fromthe students cumulative score (e.g., a score of 92.3 will be reduced to 87.3). Grading criteria

    forms that all instructors use for the graded assignmentsthe two memos and the second adviceletter--are available on TWEN Main Page.

    TWENTWEN is our on-line classroom support system and is one of the principal ways we

    communicate with students and distribute assignments. Students will receive a password at

    orientation and should immediately register on Westlaws TWEN so that they do not missinformation. All students should check TWEN (both the Main Course page and their own small

    class page) and email regularly for class information.

    Material on TWEN Main page:Handbook(including syllabus and course requirements andpolicies); Evans sample office memo, advice letter, and memos supporting and opposing a

    motion; research materials for Closed Office Memo 1; schedule for mandatory Research and

    optional Supplementary Workshops; Writing Fellow hours and policies;Material on Class page: Classroom DF power points; any individual instructor materials

    How to get Extra HelpAside from one mandatory conference with the instructor that will occur during the semester, we

    encourage students to meet with instructors and Deans Fellows whenever they feel they need

    additional guidance or instruction. All instructors and Deans Fellows have office hours that theywill announce at the first class. All students may also meet with Professor Phelps, the Director of

    the Legal Rhetoric Program, or any of the full-time Rhetoric professors, even if these are notyour classroom teachers. Call or e-mail for an appointment or drop in during posted office hours

    (posted in the Legal Rhetoric Office and on TWEN). Additionally, there are several DeansFellows whose full-time job is to provide Rhetoric students with additional assistance, including

    some Fellows who specialize in ESL. These Writing Fellows have regular hours that are posted

    in the Legal Rhetoric Office and on TWEN. The sign-up procedure is also posted on TWEN.

  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    17/42

    15

    Students may not meet with Rhetoric Writing Fellows during the blackout periods.

    In addition to this crucial one-on-one work, the Legal Rhetoric Program puts on a series of

    supplemental workshops during each semester. The workshops complement the classroom

    lessons by addressing the material in a light-hearted way and from a slightly differentperspective.

    Fall Semester Workshops

    Understanding CREAC Workshop (Professor Figley)Shows how to use CREAC to analyze a different problem.

    Writing Strategy Workshop (Professor Spratt)Demonstrates the dos and donts of effective writing.

    Understanding Rule Synthesis Workshop (Professor Figley)Examines how Rule Synthesis works.

    Citation Workshop (Professor Spratt)Reviews citation rules needed in every day practice. Exam Review Session (Professor Spratt & Professor Beske)

    Provides a supplemental review for the Research, Citation, and Writing Strategy Exam.

    Students will receive a schedule of the supplemental workshops early in the semester; the

    schedule is also posted in the Legal Rhetoric Office and on TWEN. Some students may berequired to attend some of the workshops; all are welcome to attend them.

    In short, we see our job as helping students become the best legal writers and researcherspossible and are willing to provide whatever it takes to accomplish that end. USE the resources!

    WCL Honor CodeLike an exam or any other law school assignment, all work you do in the Legal Rhetoric course

    must be your own and you must have observed the WCL Honor Code and Legal Rhetoric courserequirements in preparing it. Any course-specific requirements outlined in the course materials

    come under the Honor Code.

    You may not work with other people, students, or resources, including peer review,

    proofreading, and research, outside of class unless your instructor explicitly permits you to do so.

    Although we discuss the assignments extensively in class and work together on them, such

    discussions and work are not permitted outside of class and violate the WCL Honor Code. You

    may not review or consult any other students actual written work (including outlines, drafts, andresults of research), give or solicit advice as to how a document should be written (its substance

    and writing), or discuss the facts of an assignment or how the law applies to those facts.If, inexceptional circumstances, you request and receive permission to use the assistance of a typist,

    the typist may not correct spelling, grammar, citation form, or any other aspect of the

    assignment.

  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    18/42

    16

    Any material taken from another source must be acknowledged with quotation marks (if directly

    quoted) and a citation.

    You may work on any Legal Rhetoric matter with your instructor, your Legal Rhetoric Deans

    Fellow, other Legal Rhetoric instructors, other Legal Rhetoric Deans Fellows, Legal RhetoricWriting Fellows, and WCL reference librarians. Do not discuss assignments outside of class.

    ProfessionalismLegal Rhetoric, like many other law school classes, not only teaches the substance of the course,

    it also helps to shape students as professionals. Therefore, in Legal Rhetoric students are

    expected to practice the traits of professional responsibility, including civility; attention to detailin work products on which clients, other lawyers, and judges rely; effective time management;

    promptness and timeliness in completing and submitting work; honoring all commitments and

    attending all scheduled meetings and conferences; honesty and candor in the use of legalmaterials and in writing; truthfulness; respect; and a sense of responsibility to peers and to the

    profession.

    A Word About Next Semester. . . .Although the semesters are graded independently, the second semester of Legal Rhetoric

    continues the first. Your first assignment in the Spring semester will be based on Memo 2 fromthe Fall semester.

  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    19/42

    17

    Introduction to Legal Rhetoric

    The Legal Discourse Community

    Welcome to Washington College of Law and to the Legal Discourse Community (LDC). Byentering law school, you have become a fledgling member of the LDC, and you may have

    already noticed that language is sometimes used in ways that are unfamiliar to you: meanings

    and language conventions that are different and, consequently, confusing. The LDC is the worldof language that lawyers inhabit. Many, many discourse communities exist. If you came to law

    school directly from undergraduate school, you were a member of the academic discourse

    community. You learned to read, write, and speak using the conventions that are successful

    there. If you came from the business world, you were a member of the business discoursecommunity, from the military, the military discourse community, and so forth. Discourse

    communities are everywhere and you may, in a single day, move from one to the other without

    even noticing. Think about the ways that these words are used in the overlapping discoursecommunities portrayed below: battery, briefs, ERA.

    Each discourse community has its own conventions and rules. Some words have particular and

    specific meanings; arguments are made using certain things as proof; specific kinds of

    documents are used. Members of it read, write, and speak in a particular way that is

    BaseballMilitary

    Law You?

  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    20/42

    18

    acceptable. Entry into a new discourse community requires some initiation, some guidance,

    and much, much practice.

    Thats the purpose of the Legal Rhetoric course: to introduce you to the rules and conventions of

    the LDC and to provide an environment in which you can become a full-fledged member of thatcommunity by reading and writing as a lawyer. This initiation also occurs in your other courses,

    of course, as you learn to brief cases, to answer hypotheticals from a professor who is using

    the Socratic method, and to introduce yourself as a 1L. In the Legal Rhetoric course you will

    practice reading and writing in the LDC, making the mistakes that are always inevitable in thelearning process, without risking your job or your clients welfare. Our contract with you is that

    if you give us your best effort, we will work just as hard to guide you, and by the end of the

    semester, you will be reading and writing confidently and competently in the Legal DiscourseCommunity.

    What is Good Legal Writing?The Communication Triangle helps us to hone in on what kinds of writing lawyers do and tobegin to develop ways by which we can judge whether writing is good or not.

    Every act of writing involves the four elements portrayed on the triangle: the writer, the reader,

    the reality (the things being written about), and the language in which it is embedded. A

    Reality (Objective writing)

    Language(Literature)

    Writer

    (Expressive writing )

    Reader

    (Persuasive writing)

  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    21/42

    19

    particular act of writing and the document that is produced may be classified according to which

    of these four receives primary attention; that is, which of the four is the primary goal or purposeof the writing. For example, if you are taking notes or keeping a diary, you are writing for

    yourself; the document, such as it is, is written for you, the writer. We call this kind of writing

    expressive writing (the lower, left point of the triangle). If the reality, the thing about whichyou are writing, is most important, we call that objective writing (the upper point of the

    triangle); if the primary purpose of the document is to bring about a change in the reader, we call

    that persuasive writing; if the primary purpose of the document is to create beautiful language,

    we call that literature. All four elements are present and receive attention in any act of writing,but one of them takes preeminence in a particular document.

    You can probably begin to see that any rule for writing falls apart under this analysis. Takeone of the first writing rules you learned: spell words correctly. Does that rule apply to all four

    kinds of writing described above? Perhaps not all of them all the time. If we cant use rules to

    judge whether writing is good or not, what can we do? We can judge whether a document is

    good by whether the writing strategies (not rules) used in it achieve the desired goal of thedocument for the designated audience. In other words, you have to ask yourself before and while

    writing any document, who is this for and what do I want it to achieve? Thats the approachtaken in the Legal Rhetoric course: strategies, not rules, and strategies based on analyzing

    audience and purpose for any document. The Planning Strategies form on page 20 will assist

    you in doing this analysis. Also The Basic Principles on pages 21-23 give you some strategies

    that have proven effective in the Legal Discourse Community.

    What Kinds of Writing Do Lawyers Do?

    The Communication Triangle also helps to clarify what kinds of writing lawyers do and the

    kinds of writing that you will be learning and practicing in the Legal Rhetoric course. The firstsemester of the course focuses on written legal discourse; in the second semester, you will begin

    also to use spoken legal discourse (of course, you are learning to talk like a lawyer every day

    in law school, in classes, and elsewhere). So what is it that lawyers write and what specialcharacteristics does legal discourse have?

    Legal discourse functions in distinctive ways and has some special qualities. First, legal writing

    tends to be either objective or persuasive (the top and bottom right angles of the triangle); it israrely creative or expressive (at least not in the workplace). Second, legal discourse occurs in

    different kinds of documents. Lawyers write in various forms and with various voices: analyst,

    strategist, counselor, advocate, for example. They also write to different audiences and for

    different purposes: to inform another lawyer, to counsel a client, to persuade a judge, to namesome of the most frequent purposes and audiences. The Legal Process chart on page 26

    delineates some of the documents that lawyers write and shows when these documents arise inthe legal process. Third, legal documents often give rise to other legal documents. Finally, legal

    discourse has a significant impact beyond the confines of the legal discourse community. The

    way lawyers use language matters. Legal discourse not only interprets the law; it also creates thelaw. Lawyers writing affects peoples lives.

  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    22/42

    20

    Writing as a Process

    The Legal Rhetoric course will treat writing as a process, rather than as a product. For a long

    time, writing was taught using the product approach: teachers gave students a writingassignment, the student wrote it (the product), and the teacher graded it, perhaps with comments

    in the margins. Then there would be another assignment, and so on. The students writing might

    improve, or not; it was all rather serendipitous. It wasnt clear that writing could be taught at all.

    A few decades ago, composition theorists at some major universities (Carnegie Mellon, Purdue,

    and Southern Cal, among others) began to investigate what good writers did in the process ofproducing good documents. By taking protocols (taped monologues) from expert and novice

    (good and bad) writers as they worked on a document, the researchers were able to detect somepatterns: good writers did certain things in the process of writing. Now there was something to

    teach novice writers.

    One broad pattern that emerged from the protocols looked something like this:

    Planning Drafting Revising Final Editing Expert writers engaged in more planning activities in the writing process than did novice writers;

    they asked themselves some specific questions before, during, and after drafting (notice that

    some of the arrows go in both directions; the process is not linear, but recursive). These

    questions included information about the reader and the purpose of writing. The questions are

    adapted for legal documents in Planning Strategies on page 20 of this Handbook. In addition,the expert writers engaged in substantial revision (re-vision = re-seeing) of the document, writing

    context paragraphs, topic sentences, changing sentence structure, etc. Many of the revisingtechniques are included in the Revision Checklist" on pages 24-25. Then they did a final edit

    fixing spelling, etc. Some expert writers planned a great deal before drafting; others planned

    loosely, but always moved back into planning after an initial zero draft (getting ideas down).As a novice legal writer, you will more easily become expert by being attentive to the process of

    producing legal documents. We will work on various aspects of the process in class, sometimes

    in small groups, as you become familiar with it.

  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    23/42

    21

    Legal Rhetoric Style Sheet

    Common Writing Errors

    Pronoun referents: Pronouns must match in number and gender the noun to which they

    refer; the referent noun must also be clear and not ambiguous.

    Wrong: Neither Susan nor Jane felt that they had been treated fairly.

    Right: Neither Susan nor Jane felt that she had been treated fairly.

    Wrong: JMart frequently changedtheir security guards routines.

    Right: JMart frequently changedits security guards routines.

    Wrong: Each student must hand in their assignment on time.

    Right: Each student must hand in his or her assignment on time.

    Right: All students must hand in their assignments on time.

    Wrong: The testator and the Defendant were in a confidential relationship because he received

    financial advice.

    Right: The testator and the Defendant were in a confidential relationship because the testatorreceived financial advice.

    Subject/verb agreement when verb is separated from subject.

    Wrong: The profits earned by the pharmaceutical industry is too high.

    Right: The profits earned by the pharmaceutical industry are too high.

    Comma splices: Independent clauses may not be joined together by a comma (however is

    not a conjunction and may not be used to join independent clauses).

    Wrong: The explosion was loud, it could be heard a mile away from the construction site.

    Wrong: The explosion was loud, however it could not be heard a mile away.

    Right: The explosion was loud; it could be heard a mile away from the construction site.Right: The explosion was loud, and it could be heard a mile away from the construction site.

    Even Better: The loud explosion could be heard a mile away from the construction site.

    Semi-colon use: Semi-colons have two usesto join independent clauses instead of starting

    a new sentence (see above) and to join items in a series if the items have internal commas.

    Right: The court considered whether the defendant, who was a minor at the time of the contract,could be held responsible for his actions; whether the plaintiff, who knowingly sold to a minor,

    could be seen as negligent; and whether the defendants parents, who knew nothing of the

    transaction, could be held liable.

  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    24/42

    22

    Colons: A colon is only properly used when the syntax comes to a full stop; a colon should

    not interrupt the natural flow of a sentence.

    Wrong: The factors that the court considered are: whether the testator suffered from an insanedelusion, and whether the will was a product of that insane delusion.

    Right: The court considered two factors: whether the testator suffered from an insane delusion,

    and whether the will was a product of that insane delusion.

    Commas: Commas are properly used to indicate grammatically separate parts of a

    sentence: (1) two independent clauses, (2) an introductory clause, (3) items in a list, and (4)

    extra explanatory words, such as appositives and some transition words. Commas should

    not separate a subject and a verb, even when the verb is the second in a compound verb.

    Right: (1) The mascot asked the spectator if she would like to dance on the dugout roof, and

    the spectator agreed to do so.Right: (2) If the defendant knowingly consented to dancing with the mascot, he should not be

    permitted to sue the baseball club for his injuries.Right: (3) The plaintiff had seen others dance with the mascot at previous games, saw the

    warning sign at the entrance, and willingly agreed to dance.

    Right: (4) The plaintiff, however, did not expect a hip bump.

    Right: (4) The plaintiff, Terry Mason, did not expect to be injured while at a baseball game.Wrong: Terry Mason attended the game, and danced on the dugout.

    Its/its: Its is a possessive pronoun; its is a contraction for it is; they are not

    interchangeable.

    Right: A leopard cannot change its spots.Right: Its probably going to rain today. (Note: contractions should not be used in formal

    writingthat is, most of the kind of legal writing you will encounter.)

    The floating this: this should nearly always have a noun following it.

    Wrong: Lavelle suffered the insane delusion that he had a magical guitar pick, and Allenby

    suffered the consequences of that delusion when he accused her of stealing the guitar pick. Thisis similar to the situation inBenjamin in which the testators wife was drawn into and suffered

    the consequences of her husbands delusion.

    Right: This effect on making a will is similar to . . . (or some other noun or phrase that sums upwhat the writer means)

    Comparing like to like: in comparing facts in cases, compare people to people, situations to

    situations, not to case names:

    Wrong: UnlikeMoore, Lavelle did not depend financially on Jellico.

  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    25/42

    23

    Right: Unlike the testator inMoore, Lavelle did not depend financially on Jellico.

    Bluebook rules: TheBluebook has particular rules for things like spelling out numbers and

    capitalization. For example, sometimes court is capitalized and sometimes not, but the

    capitalization is not random: it follows particular rules. Always look up the rules and do notassume or copy from cases you are reading.

    Format

    For memoranda and briefs:

    Use Times New Roman, 12-point font, regular typeface only; Use 1-inch margins on all sides; justify left only; Number all pages (unless specific rules say otherwise) in the bottom center; Double-space except for headings, subheadings, footnotes, and block quotes; Underline and use all caps for major section (not substantive) headings: i.e.

    INTRODUCTION; Observe all page limits: office memoranda do not have page limits, but most

    documents submitted to a court do; page limits do not include the Certificate of

    Service;

    Do not orphan a heading or subheading at the bottom of a page; Check and followBluebookcapitalization rules; dont assume or copy from cases; Number and block all headings and subheadings with the numerals and letters

    indicated in the samples (see below):

    Example below of how headings should be blocked:

    I. Students should format all memoranda submitted for Legal Rhetoric accordingto the Style Sheet because professionalism and attention to detail are essential

    for effective legal writing.

    A. Effective writing requires attention to detail so that the reader is not distracted.1. Overlooking even small details, such as correct spacing, undermines the final

    product.2.

  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    26/42

    24

    Planning Strategies

    Before you begin any writing assignment, answer the following questions as well as you can.

    Return to the questions as you draft the document and refine your answers. The answers willhelp you decide whatto write about andhow to write it. They also will help you decide what

    language to use, what to include, and what to omit.

    1. What question(s) should this document answer?

    2. What is my answer to each question (no more than a few words)?

    3. Who is my reader?

    4. What is my reader's relationship to me?

    5. How much does my reader know about the subject and my answer?

    6. What is my reader's attitude about the subject and about my answer?

    7. What does my reader need to know to understand my answer? List in "need to know"

    order.

    8. Why am I writing this (to inform, to persuade, to accomplish some other end)?

    9. What constraints do I have?

  • 7/27/2019 Legal Rhetoric Syllabus2013 WCL 2013

    27/42

    25

    The Basic Principles

    What makes a good document?

    Why do some documents succeed and others fail? The difference between a good document

    and a bad one is more than spelling, punctuation, and grammar (although these certainly count

    in the equation). If we can pin down the qualities of successful documents, we are well on ourway to producing them and to helping others produce them.

    A. A good document